1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to the forestry industry, and specifically to the field of woodworking machines. In particular, the invention relates to woodworking knives used in these machines, and to clamping assemblies that secure the knives.
2. Description of the Related Art
One of the main tasks in forestry industries is the processing of trees into finished wood products. Tree processing begins with harvesting live trees and cutting the trees into logs. Logs then are processed in various ways, according to the desired end product. Thus, forestry industry operations can be significantly affected by control over, and improvement upon, log processing steps and the machines used in these steps.
In the pulp or oriented strand board industries, logs are processed by machines designed to turn solid logs into chips or wafers. Examples of these machines include chippers (in both disc and drum forms), waferizers, and stranders. To perform their respective functions, these machines typically employ one or more knives mounted to a moving base such as, for example, a rotating disc or drum. Wood is processed by moving it into the path of the rotating knives, the blades of which contact the wood at a particular depth and orientation. This contact results in the formation of chips, shavings, wafers, or strands.
In the sawmill industry, logs are processed by machines designed to chip away certain portions of the logs to form rough lumber, with wood chips as a byproduct. Examples of these machines include chipper canters, chipper edgers, and chipper slabbers. Rough lumber can be further processed by planers to yield finished lumber, with wood shavings as a byproduct. All of these machines also employ knives, which are positioned to result in the formation of a cut or planed surface on the lumber.
In the veneer industry, logs are turned on veneer lathes to yield veneer sheets. These sheets can be used for manufacturing plywood or laminated veneer lumber. Veneer lathes also employ knives. However, in a lathe, wood is removed from a log not by repetitive contact of moving knives, but rather by bringing a rotating log into contact with a stationary knife mounted to the lathe.
Regardless of its use in a particular application, a woodworking knife can in time exhibit wear, resulting in dullness and even structural failure. Also, a worn knife may not cut wood effectively, resulting in wood chips or veneers having inconsistent size or shape. Thus, wood processing operations, such as a sawmills, seek to properly maintain their woodworking knives and, in particular, sharp knife edges.
Various methods for maintaining a sharp knife edge have been developed. In one method, a knife is removed from the machine, sharpened by grinding, and remounted to the machine. A disadvantage of this method is that, after grinding, the knife may have a different (and unwanted) size or shape. Thus, a knife sharpened this way usually requires careful positioning and aligning upon remounting to the woodcutting machine; knife alignment may be particularly important in machines having configurations of multiple knives. An incorrectly positioned knife tends to negatively affect the cutting properties of the machine, diminishing or canceling the effects of sharpening the knife. Also, grinding a knife edge to a precise and accurate shape can require costly, time-consuming techniques.
Another method for maintaining knife edges is the use of reversible knives. A reversible knife is manufactured with multiple edges (often two) and designed such that when one edge becomes worn from use, the knife can be removed from its mounting assembly, rotated or flipped about a symmetrical plane, and remounted, thereby exposing a fresh edge. Reversible knives are generally disposable: when all edges of a knife are worn, it is replaced with a new knife. This method overcomes the disadvantages inherent to grinding discussed above.
However, there are disadvantages to using reversible knives. Precise positioning of a reversible knife, whether upon initial mounting or reversal, can be difficult to achieve. Mounting is often done by hand; thus, the mounted position may be influenced by human error. Mounting errors can be exacerbated when a machine's knife mounts are not readily accessible, such as when mounts are located behind other components of the machine or when mounts are at a height difficult to reach. Moreover, in some applications reversible knives experience highly asymmetric and torsional loads. These loads can overcome the clamping forces holding knives to their mounts or cause knives to displace or fracture. U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,058,989 and 7,159,626 address some of these disadvantages.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,140,408 describes a reversible knife in which the chip guiding surface includes a reentrant portion. A feature of the knife that indexes a mounting assembly is located on this reentrant portion. This design is said to alleviate wear of the indexing feature when exposed to chip cutting. A disadvantage of this design occurs during chip forming and guiding. Chips cut by the knife edge are then guided along a chip guiding surface. However, when the chips reach the reentrant portion, they may lose contact with the knife until they have passed over the indexing feature. Once the indexing feature is passed, the knife has a deflecting ridge disposed at a large angle relative to the motion of the chips. As a result, the chips can fracture or splinter when hitting the deflector ridge. Also, the indexing feature of this knife is located at a significant distance from the cutting edge. Thus, if the knife is subject to a high amount of loads during cutting, the positioning of the indexing feature at a significant distance from the cutting edge may lead to breakage. That is, the distance of the indexing feature from the cutting edge creates a moment arm for forces applied to the cutting edge, which increases the stresses at the indexing feature. Further, the concave form of the indexing feature reduces the amount of structural material at this area of high stress, making it more prone to breakage. The thickness of the knife must be increased to compensate for this weakness. Although increasing the thickness of the knife can diminish torque breakage, this increases the material cost of the knife.
Another disadvantage of reversible knives is they tend to be manufactured from higher-quality materials and under stricter manufacturing tolerances than other woodcutting knives. While this yields durable knives with long-lasting sharp edges, it increases the costs of manufacturing the knives. In particular, the material cost can be significant. Thus, even a slight reduction in the amount of material in a reversible knife can result in a greatly reduced cost per knife. This can reduce the cost of operating woodcutting machines, particularly those configured to use multiple knives.
One way to reduce the amount of material in a reversible knife is to use a low-volume design. Such a design should have a compact form with small subsidiary surfaces, which are surfaces that are not directly utilized to cut, form, or guide chips. An example of a subsidiary surface is one that is used solely for clamping a knife to a mounting assembly. An example of a large (and disadvantageous) subsidiary surface is the indexing feature of the knife described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,140,408.
The invention includes knives, as well as assemblies for mounting knives. According to an example aspect of the invention, a knife includes a first edge, a second edge, a ridge, a concave surface, and a planar surface. The first edge is defined by an intersection of a first outer edge forming surface on the knife's outer side and a first inner edge forming surface on the inner side. The second edge is defined by an intersection of a second outer edge forming surface on the knife's outer side and a second inner edge forming surface on the inner side. The ridge is on the inner side of the knife and is positioned such that its crest is parallel to the first and second edges. The concave surface is between the first inner edge forming surface and the ridge. The planar surface is adjacent to the concave surface and between the concave surface and the first inner edge forming surface. A reference plane intersects the first and second edges. A distance between any point on the concave surface and the reference plane is not less than a distance between any point on the planar surface and the reference plane.
According to another example aspect of the invention, another knife includes a first edge, a second edge, and a ridge, all similar to those described above. This knife further includes a concave surface and a planar surface. The concave surface is between the first inner edge forming surface and the ridge. The planar surface is adjacent to the concave surface and between the concave surface and the first inner edge forming surface. A reference plane intersects the first and second edges. The dihedral angle between the planar surface and the reference plane is β, and an acute angle between any line tangent to the concave surface and the reference plane is not less than β.
According to yet another aspect of the invention, another knife includes a first cutting edge, a second cutting edge, a ridge, and a chip guiding surface. The first cutting edge is defined by an intersection of a first outer edge forming surface on an outer side of the knife and a first inner edge forming surface on the inner side. The second cutting edge is defined by an intersection of a second outer edge forming surface on the outer side and a second inner edge forming surface on the inner side. The ridge is on the inner side of the knife and is positioned such that its crest is parallel to the first and second cutting edges. The chip guiding surface is between the first inner edge forming surface and the ridge. The chip guiding surface includes a concave surface and a planar surface. The planar surface is between the first inner edge forming surface and the concave surface. Chips cut by the first cutting edge are guided along the chip guiding surface without any abrupt changes in direction during guiding.
According to still another aspect of the invention, a knife includes a first edge, defined by an intersection of a first outer edge forming surface on an outer side of the knife and a first inner edge forming surface on an inner side of the knife and a second edge, defined by an intersection of a second outer edge forming surface on the outer side and a second inner edge forming surface on the inner side. The knife further includes a ridge on the inner side, positioned such that the crest of the ridge is parallel to the first and second edges, a concave surface between the first inner edge forming surface and the ridge, and a planar surface adjacent to the concave surface and between the first inner edge forming surface and the concave surface. The planar surface is contiguous with and tangentially adjoining the concave surface.
Further features and advantages, as well as the structure and operation, of various example embodiments of the present invention are described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings.
The features and advantages of the example embodiments of the invention presented herein will become more apparent from the detailed description set forth below when taken in conjunction with the drawings. Like reference numbers between two or more drawings indicate identical or functionally similar elements.
The description of the example embodiments below and the background above refer to the processing and cutting of a particular material, namely wood. However, those having skill in the relevant art will recognize that wood is simply one material that may be suitable for use with the present invention. Therefore, any references to wood shall be understood as examples rather than limitations.
The description below also contains references to chipper knives. While the present invention certainly contemplates woodchipping, this is merely an example of the broader category of wood processing to which this invention is directed. Those having skill in the art will recognize that this invention encompasses knives other than those used specifically for woodchipping. For example, this invention contemplates knives suitable for use in rotary lathes.
A chipper knife according to an example embodiment of the invention will now be described with reference to
The inner side 8 of the chipper knife 2 includes two cutting edges 5 and 5′ and a deflector ridge 13, which is equidistant from and parallel to the cutting edges 5 and 5′. The knife is symmetrical about a plane that passes through the deflector ridge 13 and that is perpendicular to a reference plane A, which passes through the cutting edges (as shown in
On either side of the deflector ridge 13 is a chip guiding surface 14, 14′. Each chip guiding surface 14, 14′ includes a first contact surface 15, 15′, a deflecting surface 16, 16′, and a second contact surface 17, 17′. Deflecting surface 16, 16′ is concave with respect to the body of the knife. The first contact surface 15, 15′ is adjacent to the crest of the deflector ridge 13 and the second contact surface 17, 17′ is adjacent to the inner edge forming surface 10, 10′. The deflecting surface 16, 16′ is between the first and second contact surfaces. Thus, the chip guiding surface 14, 14′ extends from the inner edge forming surface 10, 10′ to the crest of the deflector ridge 13, and the deflector ridge divides the inner side 8 of the chipping knife into two symmetrical chip guiding surfaces 14 and 14′. In an embodiment of the invention, the first contact surfaces 15 and 15′ and the second contact surfaces 17 and 17′ all are preferably planar, as illustrated in
In an example embodiment of the invention, a cross-section of the chip guiding surface 14, 14′ (as shown in
The inner side of a chipper knife according to the present invention is not limited to the foregoing description. For example, the chip guiding surface need not be continuous with the edge forming surface. Rather, the edge forming surface may be raised above the chip guiding surface, leading to a discontinuity between the two, a feature discussed in PCT International Publication Nos. WO 2008/085111 and WO 2008/085112. In this case, the chip guiding surface may begin at some distance from the cutting edge. As another example, the radius of curvature of the deflector ridge, i.e., the curvature on either side of the crest of the deflector ridge, can vary from that illustrated in
The chipper knife 2 can include a setting portion for engaging the knife with the outer clamping member 3. Referring to
Mounting of the chipper knife 2 to the cutting head 1 can proceed as follows. The knife can be clamped between the clamping members 3 and 4 by clamping means, an example of which is screw bolt 18. Tightening of the screw bolt 18 causes the clamping members to be forced together, as illustrated in
In the mounting configuration illustrated in
In the embodiment of the invention described above, the inner clamping member contacts the inner side of the chipping knife at two areas: the first and second contact surfaces. These contact surfaces are spatially oriented at different angles with respect to one another. This kind of contact between the knife and the clamping member provides a more secure mounting of the knife than a single area of contact. Moreover, the illustrations of this embodiment show the first contact surface positioned close to the crest of the deflector ridge and the second contact surface positioned close to the cutting edge. Such a positioning and spatial separation of the contact surfaces may further increase stability of the knife mount.
As illustrated in
Also referring to
For knives having a symmetric cross-section, α also is the dihedral angle between the plane of the contact surface 15 and the plane A, and β also is the dihedral angle between the contact surface 17 and the plane A. In embodiments of the invention where the first and second mounting surfaces 19 and 20 are planar, when the knife is mounted (that is, when the first and second contact surfaces of the knife contact the first and second mounting surfaces of the inner clamping member), α also is the dihedral angle between the surface 19 and plane A, and β also is the dihedral angle between the surface 20 and plane A.
One aspect of the invention is that knives with relatively low values of α and β can be manufactured under less strict tolerances and with less precision. Although less precise manufacturing can result in knives that deviate from the ideal design, these knives can still be suitable for use in wood processing. An example manufacturing deviation occurs when the center between parallel grooves 11 and 11′ is not exactly opposite the deflector ridge 13 (that is, the plane passing through the deflector ridge and a line centered between the parallel grooves is not exactly perpendicular to reference plane A). The inner and outer clamping members can accommodate such a deviation: the parallel grooves will align as usual to the engaging portion of the outer clamping member and the knife will contact the inner clamping member at a slightly displaced position. With the design as described displacement from the usual mounting position can still result in a secure mount with few detrimental effects. Another example deviation occurs not from manufacturing but from use: a chip guiding surface can become worn when its associated cutting edge is used to process wood. Because the surface is worn, changes can result to the first and second contact surfaces. Again, by adopting low values for α and β, the planar contact surface are less prone to wear and, accordingly, the knife is less susceptible to being incorrectly seated or secured when subsequently turned.
Certain angular ranges (and values) of α and β are preferable for accommodating deviations. In general, α is preferably (but not necessarily) less than 50°; more preferably, α is less than 40° and even more preferably, it is less than 30°. Most preferred values of α and β are 29° and 4°, respectively.
With the knife so designed, there are no abrupt changes in direction along the chip guiding surface 14, 14′. In chipping operations, for example, chips cut by cutting edge 5, 5′ will be guided along chip guiding surface 14, 14′ without meeting any abrupt changes in direction. Therefore, the chips will not be prone to splintering as they would when encountering an abrupt change in guiding direction. In some preferred designs, the chips will be guided so as to be in substantially continuous contact with the chip guiding surface 14, 14′ during guiding.
In one embodiment, contact surfaces 15, 15′ and 17, 17′ can be considered to be tangential to the curve of deflecting surface 16, 16′ at the points where the contact surfaces 15, 15′ and 17, 17′ meet deflecting surface 16, 16′. That is, the contact surfaces 15, 15′ and 17, 17′ can be said to be contiguous with and tangentially adjoining deflecting surfaces 16, 16′.
In the foregoing description, example aspects of the present invention are described with reference to specific example embodiments. Despite these specific embodiments, many additional modifications and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Thus, the example embodiments of the invention may be practiced in ways other than those specifically described. For example, although some embodiments of the invention may have been described in the context of knives suitable for use in woodchipping machines, in practice embodiments also may include knives used in other woodworking machines, such as veneer lathes. Accordingly, the specification shall be regarded as illustrative rather than restrictive, and modifications and changes thereto do not depart from its broader spirit and scope.
Similarly, the figures are presented solely for the purpose of providing illustrative examples. The example embodiments presented herein are sufficiently flexible and configurable such that the invention may be practiced in ways other than those shown in the figures.
Furthermore, the processes recited in the claims need not be performed in the order presented.
This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119 of Swedish Patent Application No. 0702365-8 filed Oct. 24, 2007, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated herein.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0702365 | Oct 2007 | SE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6058989 | LaGrange et al. | May 2000 | A |
6951313 | Frick et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6968879 | Schuh et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7140408 | Hinchliff et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7159626 | Biller et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7506674 | Biller et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7677282 | Stager | Mar 2010 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090133778 A1 | May 2009 | US |