This invention in one aspect pertains to a knotless suture lock and bone anchor, in particular a knotless suture lock and bone anchor combination wherein a suture, looped through a tissue, is threaded through a plurality of body holes in the anchor to cinch the suture and tissue to the anchor without tying a suture knot on the tissue, and wherein the anchor is adapted for embedding in a bone.
This invention relates generally to methods and apparatus for attaching soft tissue to bone, and more particularly to anchors and methods for securing connective tissue, such as ligaments or tendons, to bone. In one aspect the invention has particular application to arthroscopic surgical techniques for reattaching the rotator cuff to the humeral head, in order to repair the rotator cuff.
It is an increasingly common problem for tendons and other soft, connective tissues to tear or to detach from associated bone. One such type of tear or detachment is a “rotator cuff” tear, wherein the supraspinatus tendon separates from the humerus, causing pain and loss of ability to elevate and externally rotate the arm. Complete separation can occur if the shoulder is subjected to gross trauma, but typically, the tear begins as a small lesion, especially in older patients. To repair a torn rotator cuff, the typical course today is to do so surgically, through a large incision. This approach is presently taken in almost 99% of rotator cuff repair cases. There are two types of open surgical approaches for repair of the rotator cuff, one known as the “classic open” and the other as the “mini-open”. The classic open approach requires a large incision and complete detachment of the deltoid muscle from the acromion to facilitate exposure. The cuff is debrided to ensure suture attachment to viable tissue and to create a reasonable edge approximation. In addition, the humeral head is abraded or notched at the proposed soft tissue to bone reattachment point, as healing is enhanced on a raw bone surface. A series of small diameter holes, referred to as “transosseous tunnels”, are “punched” through the bone laterally from the abraded or notched surface to a point on the outside surface of the greater tuberosity, commonly a distance of 2 to 3 cm. Finally, the cuff is sutured and secured to the bone by pulling the suture ends through the transosseous tunnels and tying them together using the bone between two successive tunnels as a bridge, after which the deltoid muscle must be surgically reattached to the acromion. Because of this maneuver, the deltoid requires postoperative protection, thus retarding rehabilitation and possibly resulting in residual weakness. Complete rehabilitation takes approximately 9 to 12 months.
The mini-open technique, which represents the current growing trend and the majority of all surgical repair procedures, differs from the classic approach by gaining access through a smaller incision and splitting rather than detaching the deltoid. Additionally, this procedure is typically performed in conjunction with arthroscopic acromial decompression. Once the deltoid is split, it is retracted to expose the rotator cuff tear. As before, the cuff is debrided, the humeral head is abraded, and the so-called “transosseous tunnels”, are “punched” through the bone or suture anchors are inserted. Following the suturing of the rotator cuff to the humeral head, the split deltoid is surgically repaired.
Although the above described surgical techniques are the current standard of care for rotator cuff repair, they are associated with a great deal of patient discomfort and a lengthy recovery time, ranging from at least four months to one year or more. It is the above-described manipulation of the deltoid muscle together with the large skin incision that causes the majority of patient discomfort and an increased recovery time.
Less invasive arthroscopic techniques are beginning to be developed in an effort to address the shortcomings of open surgical repair. Working through small trocar portals that minimize disruption of the deltoid muscle, a few surgeons have been able to reattach the rotator cuff using various bone anchor and suture configurations. The rotator cuff is sutured intracorporeally and an anchor is driven into bone at a location appropriate for repair. Rather than thread the suture through transosseous tunnels, which are difficult or impossible to create arthroscopically using current techniques, tying the cuff down against bone using the anchor and suture completes the repair. Early results of less invasive techniques are encouraging, with a substantial reduction in both patient recovery time and discomfort.
Unfortunately, the skill level required to facilitate an entirely arthroscopic repair of the rotator cuff is inordinately high. Intracorporeal suturing is clumsy and time consuming, and only the simplest stitch patterns can be utilized. Extracorporeal knot tying is somewhat less difficult, but the tightness of the knots is difficult to judge, and the tension cannot later be adjusted. Also, because of the use of bone anchors to provide a suture fixation point in the bone, the knots that secure the soft tissues to the anchor by necessity leave the knot bundle on top of the soft tissues. In the case of rotator cuff repair, this means that the knot bundle is left in the shoulder capsule where the patient can feel it postoperatively when the patient exercises the shoulder joint. So, knots tied arthroscopically are difficult to achieve, impossible to adjust, and are located in less than optimal areas of the shoulder. Suture tension is also impossible to measure and adjust once the knot has been fixed. Consequently, because of the technical difficulty of the procedure, presently less than 1% of all rotator cuff procedures is of the arthroscopic type, and is considered investigational in nature.
Another significant difficulty with current arthroscopic rotator cuff repair techniques are shortcomings related to currently available suture anchors. Suture eyelets in bone anchors available today, which like the eye of a needle are threaded with the thread or suture, are small in radius, and can cause the suture to fail at the eyelet when the anchor is placed under high tensile loads.
There are various bone anchor designs available for use by an orthopedic surgeon for attachment of soft tissues to bone. The basic commonality between the designs is that they create an attachment point in the bone for a suture that may then be passed through the soft tissues and tied, thereby immobilizing the soft tissue. This attachment point may be accomplished by different means. Screws are known for creating such attachments, but suffer from a number of disadvantages, including their tendency to loosen over time, requiring a second procedure to later remove them, and their requirement for a relatively flat attachment geometry.
Another approach is to utilize the difference in density in the cortical bone (the tough, dense outer layer of bone) and the cancellous bone (the less dense, airy and somewhat vascular interior of the bone). There is a clear demarcation between the cortical bone and cancellous bone, where the cortical bone presents a kind of hard shell over the less dense cancellous bone. The aspect ratio of the anchor is such that it typically has a longer axis and a shorter axis and usually is pre-threaded with a suture. These designs use a hole in the cortical bone through which an anchor is inserted. The hole is drilled such that the shorter axis of the anchor will fit through the diameter of the hole, with the longer axis of the anchor being parallel to the axis of the drilled hole. After deployment in to the cancellous bone, the anchor is rotated 90° so that the long axis is aligned perpendicularly to the axis of the hole. The suture is pulled, and the anchor is seated up against the inside surface of the cortical layer of bone. Due to the mismatch in the dimensions of the long axis of the anchor and the hole diameter, the anchor cannot be retracted proximally from the hole, thus providing resistance to pull-out. These anchors still suffer from the aforementioned problem of eyelet design that stresses the sutures.
Still other prior art approaches have attempted to use a “pop rivet” approach. This type of design requires a hole in the cortical bone into which a split shaft is inserted. The split shaft is hollow, and has a tapered plug leading into its inner lumen. The tapered plug is extended out through the top of the shaft, and when the plug is retracted into the inner lumen, the tapered portion causes the split shaft to be flared outwardly, ostensibly locking the device into the bone.
Other methods of securing soft tissue to bone are known in the prior art, but are not presently considered to be feasible for shoulder repair procedures, because of physicians'0 reluctance to leave anything but a suture in the capsule area of the shoulder. The reason for this is that staples, tacks, and the like could possibly fall out and cause injury during movement. As a result of this constraint, the attachment point often must be located at a less than ideal position. Also, the tacks or staples require a substantial hole in the soft tissue, and make it difficult for the surgeon to precisely locate the soft tissue relative to the bone.
As previously discussed, any of the anchor points for sutures mentioned above require that a length of suture be passed through an eyelet fashioned in the anchor and then looped through the soft tissues and tied down to complete the securement. Much skill is required, however, to both place the sutures in the soft tissues, and to tie knots while working through a trocar under endoscopic visualization.
What is needed, therefore, is a new approach for repairing the rotator cuff or fixing other soft tissues to bone, wherein suture tension can be adjusted and possibly measured, the suture resides completely below the cortical bone surface, there is no requirement for the surgeon to tie a knot to attach the suture to the bone anchor, and wherein the procedure associated with the new approach is better for the patient, saves time, is uncomplicated to use, and easily taught to practitioners having skill in the art.
In one aspect the present invention solves the problems outlined above by providing innovative bone anchor and connective techniques which permit a suture attachment which lies beneath the cortical bone surface. In the present state of the art, the sutures which are passed through the tissues to be attached to bone typically are threaded through a small eyelet incorporated into the head of the anchor and then secured by tying knots in the sutures. Endoscopic knot tying is an arduous and technically demanding task. Therefore, the present invention discloses devices and methods for securing sutures to a bone anchor without the requirement of knot tying.
In one aspect of the invention, there is provided a bone anchor device for attaching connective tissue to bone, which comprises an anchor body, a plurality of suture retaining apertures disposed in the anchor body, and deployable structure for securing the anchor body in bone. The term “plurality of suture retaining apertures” means at least two, but three suture-retaining apertures are employed in the presently preferred embodiment.
A longitudinal axis is disposed along a center of the anchor body, wherein the plurality of suture retaining apertures are spaced axially relative to one another. Additionally, in preferred embodiments, at least two of the plurality of suture retaining apertures are transversely offset from one another relative to the longitudinal axis. Most preferably, a first of the at least two of the plurality of suture retaining apertures is disposed on one side of the longitudinal axis and a second of the at least two of the plurality of suture retaining apertures is disposed on the other side of the longitudinal axis. In other words, the two apertures are in a staggered orientation along the axis, with one on one side of the axis, and the other on the other side of the axis. The advantage of this configuration is that, as the suturing material is threaded through the axially spaced suture retaining apertures, because the apertures are offset from one another transversely, relative to the axis, the suturing material is wrapped in an angular orientation relative to the axis. This permits the suturing material to be wrapped over itself as it is threaded through the suture retaining apertures, in an “over and back” fashion, as will be described more fully hereinbelow.
In a preferred embodiment, the aforementioned deployable structure comprises a pair of deployable flaps. The anchor body comprises a substantially planar surface in which the plurality of suture retaining apertures is disposed. In its presently preferred embodiment, the anchor body comprises opposing substantially flat surfaces, wherein the plurality of suture retaining apertures extend through the entire anchor body. A stem extends proximally from a proximal end of the anchor body. At least a portion of a longitudinal slit is disposed in the stem.
In another aspect of the invention, a bone anchor device is provided for attaching connective tissue to bone. The bone anchor device comprises an anchor body having opposing substantially flat surfaces, deployable structure on a proximal end of the anchor body for securing the anchor body in bone; and a suture retaining aperture extending through the anchor body flat surfaces. The suture-retaining aperture is disposed distally of the deployable structure.
In yet another aspect of the invention, there is provided a bone anchor device for attaching connective tissue to bone, which comprises an anchor body having a distal end and a proximal end. A stem extends proximally from the proximal end of the anchor body. A deployable flap is disposed on the proximal end of the anchor body, and a notch on the anchor body is disposed at a location joining the anchor body and the deployable flap. The notch is adapted to cause the deployable flap to deploy outwardly when force is applied to a proximal end of the deployable flap by an actuator which moves distally relative to the deployable flap.
In another aspect of the invention, there is provided a bone anchor device for attaching connective tissue to bone. This inventive device comprises an anchor body having a distal end and a proximal end and a stem extending proximally from the proximal end of the anchor body. A deployable flap is disposed on the proximal end of the anchor body. The inventive device further comprises a slit, at least a portion of which is disposed in the stem.
In still another aspect of the invention, there is provided a bone anchor device for attaching connective tissue to bone. The inventive device comprises an anchor body having two opposing surfaces, and a suture retaining aperture disposed in the anchor body and extending through both of the opposing surfaces. A length of suturing material extends through the suture retaining aperture, wherein the length of suturing material is looped about the anchor body and contacts substantial portions of both of the two opposing surfaces. Advantageously, in order to fully lock the suturing material in place on the anchor body, a first portion of the length of suturing material is looped over a second portion of the length of suturing material, the second portion of which lies in contacting engagement with one of the opposing surfaces of the anchor body.
Preferably, a second suture-retaining aperture is disposed in the anchor body in axially spaced relation to the suture-retaining aperture, wherein the length of suture retaining material is looped through both of the suture retaining apertures.
In yet another aspect of the invention, there is disclosed a method for securing connective tissue to bone. This inventive method comprises a step of securing a first end of a length of suture to a portion of soft tissue to be attached to a portion of bone. A second end of the length of suture is threaded sequentially through a plurality of suture retaining apertures in a body of a bone anchor device so that the length of suture is securely fastened to the bone anchor body. The bone anchor body is placed in a blind hole disposed in the aforementioned portion of bone. Then, structure on the bone anchor body is deployed in an outward direction to secure the bone anchor body in the blind hole.
In a further aspect, the present suture lock and bone anchor combination is an embeddable bone anchor adapted to attach tissue to bone without a suture knot on the tissue by suturing the tissue without tying a suture knot on the tissue, and cinching the suture onto the anchor such that the anchor can be embedded into the bone to reattach the tissue to the bone. The loop is formed on the anchor by fixing the standing leg portion of the suture distally in the anchor and threading the working leg portion of the loop through holes in the anchor. On pulling on the working leg portion, the suture tightens on the anchor to cinch the loop and tissue to the anchor, without forming a knot on the tissue. The anchor is adapted such that, on embedding the anchor in the bone, the standing leg portion of the suture is located distally in the bone, and the working leg portion projects out of the bone. Barbs on the anchor resist pullout of the anchor from the bone; the barbs also increase the frictional force on the suture in the bone to maintain the integrity of the loop.
In one embodiment, the present suture lock and bone anchor comprises a body structure comprising a plurality of body holes adapted to thread a suture through the body structure; a suture leg-anchoring structure adapted to fasten a standing leg portion of the suture onto the anchor; and a bone-embedding structure adapted to embed the anchor in a bone, wherein a tissue can be cinched to the anchor by suturing the tissue without tying a knot on the tissue, attaching the standing leg portion of the suture onto the leg-anchoring structure, threading the working the portion of the suture through the body holes, and pulling on the working leg portion of the suture.
In another embodiment the present suturing lock and bone anchoring system is a suture lock and bone anchoring system comprising: a embeddable anchor body structure comprising a plurality of body holes adapted for threading a suture therethrough; a suture leg-anchoring structure disposed distally of the body structure; and a suture having a standing leg portion and a working leg portion threaded through the body holes, wherein the standing leg portion of the suture is attached to the suture leg-anchoring structure, and the working leg portion is cinchable onto the body structure by pulling on the working leg portion through the body holes.
In another embodiment the present suture lock and bone anchor comprises a method of anchoring tissue to bone, comprising: passing a length of suture through the tissue to obtain a standing leg portion and a working end portion of suture; attaching the standing end portion of the suture to a suture leg-anchoring structure on a bone anchor, the bone anchor comprised of a distal section and a proximal section; threading the working end portion of the suture through a plurality of body holes in a body structure of the anchor to form a cinchable suture loop on the anchor proximally of the suture leg-anchoring structure; and imbedding the bone anchor in a bone such that the standing leg is oriented distally of the anchor body.
The invention, together with additional features and advantages thereof, may best be understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying illustrative drawing.
Referring now more particularly to the drawings, there is shown in
As shown in
Referring now to
Referring now to
As the deployment force exerted by the barrel 32 is taken directly on the face of the flaps 14a, 14b, as noted supra, the notches 16a, 16b close and limit the bending of the flaps 14a, 14b, and the load on the weak links 22a, 22b on opposing sides of the slit 20 begins to increase as a result of the imposition of a tensile force on the proximal end of the bone anchor after the distal end thereof has been anchored into the bone. In other words, because the anchor body 11 is fixed in the bone, and cannot move responsive to the applied tensile force, the reactive force applied by the anchor body on the stem 18 causes the weak links 20a, 20b to fracture, thereby separating the casing 24 and the broken stem 18 from the bone anchor 10, leaving the bone anchor 10 anchored into the bone structure.
Referring to
An important feature of the present invention concerns the placement of the suture retaining apertures or eyelet holes 12a, 12b, and 12c. As illustrated in
In one presently preferred embodiment, as illustrated in
Additionally, as shown in
In
It is to be understood, of course, that while we have been talking about a preferred case of two free lengths 34a, 34b of suture which extend from two bound ends 40a, 40b thereof, wherein the bound ends are actually the two opposing ends of a loop of suture extending through a portion of soft tissue in the form of a mattress stitch, this invention is equally well adapted to the use of a single length of suture, or a plurality of lengths of suture greater than two, if desired.
Referring now to
Alternate rotator cuff repair procedures are also discussed in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/475,495, filed on Dec. 30, 1999, and entitled Method and Apparatus for Attaching Connective Tissues to Bone Using a Knotless Suture Anchoring Device, which is herein expressly incorporated by reference.
Referring still to
b illustrates in enlarged detail how the bone anchor 10 is inserted through the trocar 56 by means of the barrel 32 of the deployment device 26 and into the hole 58 which has been made in the humeral head 48.
In
The bone anchor of
In
In
Alternative methods for preventing loosening or unraveling of the suture 34 from the bone anchor 10 are illustrated in
Additional alternative embodiments of the present invention may be seen by referring to
In this embodiment, a length of suture 76, comprising free legs 76a, 76b, is threaded from the rear side of the bone anchor 70 through the eyelet hole 72a, then weaved about the anchor body 78 through the trough 74b from the front side of the bone anchor 70 and back to the rear side of the anchor body 78. The suture 76 is then threaded through the eyelet hole 72b to the front side of the bone anchor 70 and passed through a loop 79 created between the eyelet hole 72a and the trough 74b. In all respects, the deployment of the bone anchor is essentially the same as with those anchors described above, and it should be clear that the tension in the suture 76 as it passes through the loop 78 creates a binding force similar to that previously described with the 3 hole anchor.
In
It is to be understood that the figures of the bone and anchors seen above are purely illustrative in nature, and are not intended to perfectly reproduce the physiologic and anatomic nature of the humeral head as expected to be seen in the human species, nor to limit the application of the inventive embodiments to repair of the rotator cuff. The invention is applicable to many different types of procedures involving, in particular, the attachment of connective or soft tissue to bone.
Connective tissue such as ligaments, cartilage and tendons may tear and detach from the bone and muscle to cause pain and discomfort. One such tissue is the glenoid labrum in the shoulder, which, if torn from its associated bone, may cause pain and inability to elevate and rotate the arm. The torn tissue may result in complete separation of the tissue from the bone, but the tear may be partial, starting from a small lesion on the tissue.
A torn connective tissue can surgically be reattached to the bone and muscle by an open procedure that involves making an incision into the body, and suturing the tissue to the bone and muscle. In one such procedure, the tissue, if not already completely detached, is completely detached from the bone and the bone is debrided to match the edge of tissue at the tissue/bone reattachment location. The bone is also abraded and notched at the reattachment location to expedite healing. To reattach the tissue to the bone, a series of small diameter holes referred to as transosseous tunnels are punched through the bone over a distance of about 2 cm to 3 cm on the bone. One end of the is suture is attached to the tissue and at the other end of the suture is attached to the bone by threading the suture through the transosseous tunnels, and tying the suture on intact bone between two successive tunnels; thereafter, the incision is closed.
As will be appreciated, because the open procedure involves a large incision in the skin and the removal and subsequent reattachment of muscle to bony structures, the patient may experience postoperative discomfort and a relatively long recovery time.
In an alternative procedure that minimizes the incision and reduces postoperative discomfort, the reattachment is done arthroscopically. In an arthroscopic procedure the surgeon reconnects the tissue to the bone by working through a small trocar portal into the body. In one arthroscopic procedure, rather than using transosseous tunnels to thread the suture through the bone, which is difficult to achieve arthroscopically, the disconnected tissue is connected to the bone by attaching the tissue to one end of a suture, securing the other end of the suture in a bone anchor, and embedding the anchor in the bone.
Although arthroscopic procedures are less invasive than open procedures, it is not always the procedure used. One reason is that arthroscopic suturing requires a high level of skill not possessed by all surgeons. Another is that arthroscopic suturing is clumsy and time consuming and only the simplest stitch patterns can be utilized. Further, with arthroscopic suturing it is difficult to judge the proper tightness of the suture knot, or the tension on the suture, or easily adjust the suturing. Further, with arthroscopic suturing, the knots on the suture may end up on top of the tissue as a knot bundle which, postoperatively, can be problematic if it causes irritation when the tissue is exercised.
In reattaching the tissue to the bone, besides the problems arising from using the suture, other problems may arise due to the anchor. For example, with anchors that use an eyelet to attach the suture to the anchor, because the eyelets are small with a tight radius as in the eye of a needle, the pressure on the suture in the eyelet is high which may cause the suture to fail at the eyelet when the anchor is embedded and the tissue is tensioned.
Another problem with anchors is that due to the need to minimize the profile of the anchor projecting above the bone, an attachment structure such as a screw is used to attach the anchor to the bone; however, a problem with the attachment structures is their tendency to loosen and detach the anchor. Besides, these attachment structures also project an undesired profile on the bone surface.
An embeddable anchor that does not project a profile on the bone is disclosed in commonly assigned and co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/143,132 filed on Jun. 1, 2005, herein incorporated by reference for all purposes. In various embodiments the anchor utilizes the difference in hardness in the bone between the outer, tough cortical layer, and the inner, airy vascular cancellous layer, for embedding the anchor in the bone. To utilize this difference in the bone, the anchor is designed with a longitudinal axis having a proximal longer portion and a distal shorter portion, and a mechanism to rotate the portions relative to each other. The anchor is also designed to be pre-threaded with suture.
To use this anchor, a hole is drilled through the cortical layer of the bone into the cancellous layer to receive the anchor. The anchor is deployed in the hole past the cortical layer. Thereafter, the longer axial portion is rotated orthogonally relative to the shorter axial portion such that the longer portion is seated against the underside of the cortical layer in the hole, thereby embedding the anchor in the bone.
Another embeddable anchor that does not rely on an attachment structure is an anchor that uses a pop-rivet structure to embed the anchor. This type of anchor requires forming a hole in the cortical bone into which a split shaft is inserted. The split shaft is hollow and comprises a tapered plug leading into an inner lumen. To use the anchor, the tapered plug is retracted out through the top of the shaft; the anchor is inserted into a hole in the bone; and the plug is inserted into the inner lumen to flare the tapered portion of the split shaft outwardly, thereby embedding the anchor in the bone.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,324,308 to Pierce (“Pierce”) discloses an anchor wherein a distal wedge component comprising two holes at its base is used to thread a suture. When the assembly is placed in a hole in the bone and the suture is tensioned, the distal wedge rides up against a proximal wedge block, expanding the projected area within the drilled hole, to embed the anchor in the bone.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,383,905 to Golds et al (“Golds”) discloses an anchor wherein a bead member having a longitudinal bore and an anchor member adapted to be slidably inserted within the bore of the bead member is used to secure the suture. The anchor member includes two axial compressible sections that define a passageway to receive two end portions of a suture loop. The axial sections collapse radially inwardly upon insertion of the anchor member within the bore of the bead member to wedge the suture within the passageway.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,584,835 to Greenfield (“Greenfield”) discloses an anchor comprising a pug to secure the suture and embed the anchor in the bone. In Greenfied, an anchor portion is adapted to accept the plug and the suture, and the plug is configured such that when it is forced into its receptacle in the anchor, the suture is held by friction between the wall of the anchor and the body of the plug.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,702,397 to Goble et al (“Goble”) discloses an anchor comprising a threaded body with an inner cavity to anchor the suture. The cavity is open at one end of the threaded body, and joins two lumens that run out to the other end of the threaded body. Within the cavity is disposed a gear, journaled on an axle. A length of suture is threaded through one lumen, around the gear, and out through the other lumen. A ball is disposed within the cavity to ride against a tapered race and lock the suture in place.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,652,561 to Tran (“Tran”), hereby incorporated herein by reference for all purposes, discloses an embeddable anchor that does not require tying a knot on the suture to secure the tissue, and which allows for adjusting the tension on the suture after the tissue is attached to the anchor. In one embodiment, the anchor comprises an anchor body, a plurality of suture retaining holes disposed in the anchor body, and a deployable structure for embedding the anchor in the bone. In various embodiments the suture is attached to the tissue and the ends of the suture are threaded through the anchor such that on pulling on the suture, the suture is locked on the anchor, thereby attaching the tissue to the anchor.
In procedures for reattaching body tissue to bone, there is a continuing need for embeddable anchors that eliminate the need to tie a suture knot on the tissue, and simplify the procedure. It is therefore and objective to address these needs.
As used herein the portion of the suture fixed or attached to tissue or bone is referred to as the “standing end”; the other end of the suture that extends towards the handler, or is manipulated by the handler, is referred to as the “working end” or tail of the suture. The distal end of the implant or suture is that portion of the suture located away from the handler; and the proximal end is located next to or near the handler.
The present suture lock and bone anchor in one embodiment, without a suture, is illustrated in
With reference to
With reference to
With reference to
As is illustrated in
With reference to
In various embodiments, the anchor (110) including body structure, the suture leg-anchoring structure (120) and the bone-embedding structure (124) are comprised of an implantable material selected from the group consisting of a metal, a polymer, a ceramic or combinations thereof. Such materials are known to one ordinarily skilled in the art and are generally available.
With reference to
With reference to
An anchor deployment device (150) that can be used to insert the anchor (110) in a bone is illustrated in
With reference to
With further reference to
With reference to
Accordingly, although an exemplary embodiment of the invention has been shown and described, it is to be understood that all the terms used herein are descriptive rather than limiting, and that many changes, modifications, and substitutions may be made by one having ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. In particular, it is noted that the procedures, while oriented toward the arthroscopic repair of the rotator cuff and the labrum, are applicable to the repair of any body location wherein it is desired to attach or reattach soft tissue to bone, particularly using an arthroscopic procedure. Also, the various aspects of the invention described herein may be modified and/or used in combination with such other aspects also described to be part of the invention or disclosed in references discussed to form other advantageous variations considered to be part of the invention covered.
This Application is a Continuation-in-part of commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/690,438 filed on Oct. 21, 2003, now abandoned, herein incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
918570 | Mather | Apr 1909 | A |
1153053 | Forster | Sep 1915 | A |
1565041 | Arneu | Dec 1925 | A |
2269963 | Wrapler | Jan 1942 | A |
2485531 | Dzus et al. | Oct 1949 | A |
2600395 | Domoj et al. | Jun 1952 | A |
3143916 | Rice | Aug 1964 | A |
3942407 | Mortensen | Mar 1976 | A |
3946740 | Bassett | Mar 1976 | A |
3994521 | Van Gompel | Nov 1976 | A |
4109658 | Hughes | Aug 1978 | A |
4210148 | Stivala | Jul 1980 | A |
4274324 | Giannuzzi | Jun 1981 | A |
4301551 | Dore et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4319428 | Fox | Mar 1982 | A |
4345601 | Fukuda | Aug 1982 | A |
4373530 | Kilejian | Feb 1983 | A |
4384389 | Sato | May 1983 | A |
4409974 | Freedland | Oct 1983 | A |
4456270 | Zettl et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4467478 | Jurgutis | Aug 1984 | A |
4483023 | Hoffman, Jr. et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4493323 | Albright et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4590928 | Hunt et al. | May 1986 | A |
4597776 | Ullman et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4605414 | Czajka | Aug 1986 | A |
4621640 | Mulhollan et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4635637 | Schreiber | Jan 1987 | A |
4657461 | Smith | Apr 1987 | A |
4672957 | Hourahane | Jun 1987 | A |
4712542 | Daniel et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4721103 | Freedland | Jan 1988 | A |
4731084 | Dunn et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4738255 | Goble et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4741330 | Hayhurst | May 1988 | A |
4750492 | Jacobs | Jun 1988 | A |
4772286 | Goble et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4779616 | Johnson et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4809408 | Abrahamson | Mar 1989 | A |
4823780 | Odensten et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4828439 | Giannuzzi | May 1989 | A |
4851005 | Hunt et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4870957 | Goble et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4917700 | Aikins | Apr 1990 | A |
4926860 | Stice et al. | May 1990 | A |
4935027 | Yoon | Jun 1990 | A |
4946467 | Ohi et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4946468 | Li | Aug 1990 | A |
4957498 | Caspari | Sep 1990 | A |
4968315 | Gatturna | Nov 1990 | A |
4981149 | Yoon et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4987665 | Dumican | Jan 1991 | A |
5002550 | Li | Mar 1991 | A |
5019093 | Kaplan et al. | May 1991 | A |
5037422 | Hayhurst | Aug 1991 | A |
5046513 | Gatturna | Sep 1991 | A |
5059201 | Asnis | Oct 1991 | A |
5062344 | Gerker | Nov 1991 | A |
5085661 | Moss | Feb 1992 | A |
5147166 | Harker | Sep 1992 | A |
5195542 | Gazielly et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5203787 | Noblitt et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
RE34293 | Goble et al. | Jun 1993 | E |
5217495 | Kaplan et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5219359 | McQuilkin et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5224946 | Hayhurst | Jul 1993 | A |
5258016 | DiPoto et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5263984 | Li | Nov 1993 | A |
5275176 | Chandler | Jan 1994 | A |
5304184 | Hathaway et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5324308 | Pierce | Jun 1994 | A |
5326205 | Anspach, Jr. et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5330442 | Green | Jul 1994 | A |
5330468 | Burkhart | Jul 1994 | A |
5330488 | Goldrath | Jul 1994 | A |
5336240 | Metzler | Aug 1994 | A |
5354298 | Lee et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5364407 | Poll | Nov 1994 | A |
5376118 | Kaplan et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5383905 | Gold et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5405352 | Weston | Apr 1995 | A |
5405359 | Pierce | Apr 1995 | A |
5413579 | Du | May 1995 | A |
5417691 | Hayhurst | May 1995 | A |
5417699 | Klein et al. | May 1995 | A |
5417712 | Whitaker et al. | May 1995 | A |
5431666 | Sauer et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5441508 | Gazielly et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5445167 | Yoon et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5450860 | O'Connor | Sep 1995 | A |
5454823 | Richardson et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5464427 | Curtis et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5470335 | Du Toit | Nov 1995 | A |
5472452 | Trott | Dec 1995 | A |
5480403 | Lee et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5486197 | Le et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5499991 | Garman et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5501683 | Trott | Mar 1996 | A |
5501695 | Anspach, Jr. et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5505735 | Li | Apr 1996 | A |
5514159 | Matula et al. | May 1996 | A |
5522820 | Caspari et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5527322 | Klein et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5527343 | Bonutti | Jun 1996 | A |
5531763 | Mastri et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5531792 | Huene | Jul 1996 | A |
5534012 | Bonutti | Jul 1996 | A |
5540703 | Barker, Jr. et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5545180 | Le et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5549617 | Green et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5549630 | Bonutti | Aug 1996 | A |
5553360 | Lucas et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5562689 | Green et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5569305 | Bonutti | Oct 1996 | A |
5569306 | Thal | Oct 1996 | A |
5571104 | Li | Nov 1996 | A |
5571120 | Yoon | Nov 1996 | A |
5573540 | Yoon | Nov 1996 | A |
5573542 | Stevens | Nov 1996 | A |
5573548 | Nazre et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5575801 | Habermeyer et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5584835 | Greenfield | Dec 1996 | A |
5584839 | Gieringer | Dec 1996 | A |
5584860 | Goble et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5584862 | Bonutti | Dec 1996 | A |
5591207 | Coleman | Jan 1997 | A |
5593189 | Little | Jan 1997 | A |
5601558 | Torrie et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5609597 | Lehrer | Mar 1997 | A |
5611801 | Songer | Mar 1997 | A |
5613974 | Andreas et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5618290 | Toy et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5618314 | Harwin et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5626614 | Hart | May 1997 | A |
5630824 | Hart | May 1997 | A |
5632748 | Beck, Jr. et al. | May 1997 | A |
5645589 | Li | Jul 1997 | A |
5647874 | Hayhurst | Jul 1997 | A |
5649940 | Hart et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5658313 | Thal | Aug 1997 | A |
5665110 | Chervitz et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5665112 | Thal | Sep 1997 | A |
5667528 | Colligan | Sep 1997 | A |
D385352 | Bales et al. | Oct 1997 | S |
5681333 | Burkhart et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5681351 | Jamiolkowski | Oct 1997 | A |
5683418 | Luscombe et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5683419 | Thal | Nov 1997 | A |
5690649 | Li | Nov 1997 | A |
5693060 | Martin | Dec 1997 | A |
5697950 | Fucci et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702397 | Goble et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702398 | Tarabishy | Dec 1997 | A |
5707362 | Yoon | Jan 1998 | A |
5707394 | Miller et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5709708 | Thal | Jan 1998 | A |
5720765 | Thal | Feb 1998 | A |
5725541 | Anspach, III et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5728136 | Thal | Mar 1998 | A |
5733307 | Dinsdale | Mar 1998 | A |
5741281 | Martin | Apr 1998 | A |
5741282 | Anspach, III et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5766250 | Chervitz et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5782863 | Bartlett | Jul 1998 | A |
5782864 | Lizardi | Jul 1998 | A |
5782865 | Grotz | Jul 1998 | A |
5791899 | Sachdeva | Aug 1998 | A |
5792152 | Klein et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797927 | Yoon | Aug 1998 | A |
5797963 | McDevitt | Aug 1998 | A |
5810848 | Hayhurst | Sep 1998 | A |
5810854 | Beach | Sep 1998 | A |
5814052 | Nakao et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5814071 | McDevitt et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5814072 | Bonutti | Sep 1998 | A |
5843111 | Vijfvinkel | Dec 1998 | A |
5849004 | Bramlet | Dec 1998 | A |
5860978 | McDevitt | Jan 1999 | A |
5860991 | Klein et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5860992 | Daniel et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5868789 | Heubner | Feb 1999 | A |
5879372 | Bartlett | Mar 1999 | A |
5882340 | Yoon | Mar 1999 | A |
5885294 | Pedlick et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5891168 | Thal | Apr 1999 | A |
5893850 | Cachia | Apr 1999 | A |
5902311 | Andreas et al. | May 1999 | A |
5904692 | Steckel et al. | May 1999 | A |
5911721 | Nicholson et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5921994 | Andreas et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5935129 | Mdevitt | Aug 1999 | A |
5941900 | Bonutti | Aug 1999 | A |
5941901 | Egan | Aug 1999 | A |
5944724 | Lizardi | Aug 1999 | A |
5944739 | Zlock et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5947982 | Duran | Sep 1999 | A |
5948000 | Larsen et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5948001 | Larsen | Sep 1999 | A |
5948002 | Bonutti | Sep 1999 | A |
5957953 | DiPoto et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5957968 | Belden et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5961530 | Moore et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5961538 | Pedlick et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5968044 | Nicholson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5980558 | Wiley | Nov 1999 | A |
5980559 | Bonutti | Nov 1999 | A |
5984933 | Yoon | Nov 1999 | A |
5993459 | Larsen | Nov 1999 | A |
6001104 | Benderev et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6001109 | Kontos | Dec 1999 | A |
6007566 | Wenstrom | Dec 1999 | A |
6007567 | Bonutti | Dec 1999 | A |
6010525 | Bonutti et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6013083 | Bennett | Jan 2000 | A |
6017346 | Grotz | Jan 2000 | A |
6022360 | Reimels et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6022373 | Li | Feb 2000 | A |
6024758 | Thal | Feb 2000 | A |
6033430 | Bonutti | Mar 2000 | A |
6036699 | Andreas et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6045571 | Hill et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6045572 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6045573 | Wenstrom et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6045574 | Thal | Apr 2000 | A |
6048351 | Gordon et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6051006 | Shluzas et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6053935 | Brenneman et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6056773 | Bonutti | May 2000 | A |
6068648 | Cole et al. | May 2000 | A |
6086608 | Elk et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6096051 | Kortenbach et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6102934 | Li | Aug 2000 | A |
6117160 | Bonutti | Sep 2000 | A |
6117161 | Li | Sep 2000 | A |
6143004 | Davis et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6146386 | Blackman | Nov 2000 | A |
6146406 | Shluzas et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6149669 | Li | Nov 2000 | A |
6156039 | Thal | Dec 2000 | A |
6156056 | Kearns et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6159235 | Kim | Dec 2000 | A |
6162537 | Martin et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6171317 | Jackson et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6200329 | Fung et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6200893 | Sneh | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206895 | Levison | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6217592 | Freda et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221107 | Steiner et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6228096 | Marchand | May 2001 | B1 |
6241736 | Sater | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6267766 | Burkhart | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6280474 | Cassidy et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6293961 | Schwartz | Sep 2001 | B2 |
6315781 | Reinhardt | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319252 | McDevitt et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319269 | Li | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319271 | Schwartz | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6328758 | Tornier et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6355053 | Li | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6409743 | Fenton | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6451030 | Li et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6464713 | Bonutti | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6471715 | Weiss | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6475230 | Bonutti et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6491714 | Bennett | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6517542 | Papay et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6520980 | Foerster | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6524317 | Ritchart et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6527794 | McDevitt et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6540770 | Tornier et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6569187 | Bonutti et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6575987 | Gellman et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6582453 | Tran et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6585730 | Foerster | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6635073 | Bonutti | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6638279 | Bonutti | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6645227 | Fallin et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6648903 | Pierson, III | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6652561 | Tran | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6656183 | Colleran et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6660008 | Foerster et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6660023 | McDevitt et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6679896 | Gellman et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6682549 | Bartlett | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6689154 | Bartlett | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6692516 | West et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6736829 | Li et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6770076 | Foerster | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6780198 | Gregoire et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6855157 | Foerster et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6860887 | Frankle | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6972027 | Fallin et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7083638 | Foerster | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7090690 | Foerster et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7104999 | Overaker | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7150757 | Fallin et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7247164 | Ritchart et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7329272 | Burkhart et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
20030167062 | Gambale | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030191498 | Foerster et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195563 | Foerster | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195564 | Tran et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040138706 | Abrams et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040236336 | Foerster et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243179 | Foerster | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260345 | Foerster | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050080455 | Schmieding et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050240226 | Foerster et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050277986 | Foerster | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004364 | Green et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060079904 | Thal | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060271060 | Gordon | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271105 | Foerster | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060293710 | Foerster | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070142838 | Jordan | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070203508 | White et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080015594 | Ritchart et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080051836 | Foerster et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080319478 | Foerster et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090069823 | Foerster et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3509417 | Sep 1986 | DE |
0 535 906 | Apr 1993 | EP |
0 571 686 | Dec 1993 | EP |
0 611557 | Aug 1994 | EP |
1 072 234 | Jan 2001 | EP |
1 072 237 | Jan 2001 | EP |
2777442 | Oct 1999 | FR |
2777477 | Oct 1999 | FR |
2286468 | Nov 1990 | JP |
8-52154 | Feb 1996 | JP |
8910096 | Nov 1989 | WO |
9106247 | May 1991 | WO |
9506439 | Mar 1995 | WO |
9525469 | Sep 1995 | WO |
9953843 | Oct 1999 | WO |
9953844 | Oct 1999 | WO |
0221997 | Mar 2002 | WO |
03049620 | Jun 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060293710 A1 | Dec 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10690438 | Oct 2003 | US |
Child | 11375691 | US |