This application is related to the following co-pending applications that are filed on even date herewith and are assigned to the same assignee: DISPERSION STRENGTHENED L12 ALUMINUM ALLOYS, Ser. No. 12/148,432; HEAT TREATABLE L12 ALUMINUM ALLOYS, Ser. No. 12/148,383; HIGH STRENGTH L12 ALUMINUM ALLOYS, Ser. No. 12/148,394; HIGH STRENGTH L12 ALUMINUM ALLOYS, Ser. No. 12/148,382; HEAT TREATABLE L12 ALUMINUM ALLOYS, Ser. No. 12/148,396; HIGH STRENGTH L12 ALUMINUM ALLOYS, Ser. No. 12/148,387; HIGH STRENGTH ALUMINUM ALLOYS WITH L12 PRECIPITATES, Ser. No. 12/148,426; HIGH STRENGTH L12ALUMINUM ALLOYS, Ser. No. 12/148,459; and L12 STRENGTHENED AMORPHOUS ALUMINUM ALLOYS, Ser. No. 12/148,458.
The present invention relates generally to aluminum alloys and more specifically to two and three phase L12 aluminum alloys with high strength and improved ductility.
The combination of high strength, ductility, and fracture toughness, as well as low density, make aluminum alloys natural candidates for aerospace and space applications. However, their use is typically limited to temperatures below about 300° F. (149° C.) since most aluminum alloys start to lose strength in that temperature range as a result of coarsening of strengthening precipitates.
The development of aluminum alloys with improved elevated temperature mechanical properties is a continuing process. Some attempts have included aluminum-iron and aluminum-chromium based alloys such as Al—Fe—Ce, Al—Fe—V—Si, Al—Fe—Ce—W, and Al—Cr—Zr—Mn that contain incoherent dispersoids. These alloys, however, also lose strength at elevated temperatures due to particle coarsening. In addition, these alloys exhibit ductility and fracture toughness values lower than other commercially available aluminum alloys.
Other attempts have included the development of mechanically alloyed Al—Mg and Al—Ti alloys containing ceramic dispersoids. These alloys exhibit improved high temperature strength due to the particle dispersion, but the ductility and fracture toughness are not improved.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,248,453 discloses aluminum alloys strengthened by dispersed Al3X L12 intermetallic phases where X is selected from the group consisting of Sc, Er, Lu, Yb, Tm, and Lu. The Al3X particles are coherent with the aluminum alloy matrix and are resistant to coarsening at elevated temperatures. The improved mechanical properties of the disclosed dispersion strengthened L12 aluminum alloys are stable up to 572° F. (300° C.). U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2006/0269437 A1 discloses a high strength aluminum alloy that contains scandium and other elements that is strengthened by L12 dispersoids.
L12 strengthened aluminum alloys have high strength and improved fatigue properties compared to commercial aluminum alloys. Fine grain size results in improved mechanical properties of materials. Hall-Petch strengthening has been known for decades where strength increases as grain size decreases. An optimum grain size for optimum strength is in the nano range of about 30 to 100 nm. These alloys also have lower ductility.
Fine grain aluminum alloys exhibit high strength but the lower ductility leads to lower fracture toughness. It would be desirable to develop a high strength aluminum alloy with acceptable fracture toughness.
The present invention is aluminum alloys with high strength and acceptable fracture toughness. In embodiments, these properties are achieved with a dual phase microstructure. The microstructure consists of a fine grain matrix strengthened by a dispersion of coherent L12 Al3X dispersoids where X is at least one first element selected from scandium, erbium, thulium, ytterbium, and lutetium, and at least one second element selected from gadolinium, yttrium, zirconium, titanium, hafnium, and niobium. The balance is substantially aluminum containing at least one alloying element selected from silicon, magnesium, lithium, copper, zinc, and nickel.
The addition of larger ductile aluminum alloy second phase particles (i.e., coarse grains) dispersed throughout the high strength fine grain matrix act to increase the fracture toughness by acting to blunt crack tips, thereby reducing the driving force for crack growth. The size of the coarse grains ranges from about 25 to about 250 microns, more preferably about 50 to about 200 microns, and even more preferably about 100 to about 150 microns. To provide a balanced combination of strength, ductility and toughness, the volume fraction of the coarse grains ranges from about 10 to about 50 volume percent, more preferably about 15 to about 40 volume percent, and even more preferably about 20 to about 30 volume percent. The resulting aluminum alloy is a bimodal system alloy.
It has also been discovered that ceramic reinforcements may be added to the bimodal system alloys to further increase their strength and modulus, thereby forming a trimodal system alloy. Trimodal system alloys have a higher load transfer mechanism that results in higher strength and modulus. Aluminum oxide, silicon carbide, boron carbide, aluminum nitride, titanium boride, titanium diboride and titanium carbide are suitable ceramic reinforcements.
In order to be effective, the reinforcing ceramic particles need to have fine size, moderate volume fraction and a good interface between the matrix and reinforcement. These ceramic reinforcements can have particle sizes ranging from about 0.5 to about 50 microns, more preferably about 1 to about 20 microns, and even more preferably 1 to about 10 microns. The volume fraction of ceramic reinforcements that may be added ranges from about 5 to about 40 volume percent, more preferably about 10 to about 30 volume percent, and even more preferably about 15 to about 25 volume percent. These fine ceramic reinforcement particles located at the grain boundary and within the grain boundary will restrict the dislocation from going around particles. The dislocations become attached with particles on the departure side, and thus require more energy to detach the dislocation.
The alloys of this invention are based on aluminum based alloys with a bimodal or trimodal microstructure with high strength and fracture toughness for applications at temperatures from about −420° F. (−251° C.) up to about 650° F. (343° C.). A bimodal microstructure consists of relatively coarse ductile grains in a high strength ultra fine grain aluminum alloy matrix strengthened with coherent L12 Al3X dispersoids where X is at least one first element selected from scandium, erbium, thulium, ytterbium, and lutetium, and at least one second element selected from gadolinium, yttrium, zirconium, titanium, hafnium, and niobium. A trimodal microstructure is created when ceramic reinforcements are added to the bimodal system alloy.
The coarse grains can comprise any aluminum alloy with sufficient strength and ductility.
The high strength fine grain matrix of this invention comprises a solid solution of aluminum and at least one element selected from silicon, magnesium, lithium, copper, zinc, and nickel strengthened by L12 coherent precipitates where X is at least one first element selected from scandium, erbium, thulium, ytterbium, and lutetium, and at least one second element selected from gadolinium, yttrium, zirconium, titanium, hafnium, and niobium.
The aluminum silicon system is a simple eutectic alloy system with a eutectic reaction at 12.5 weight percent silicon and 1077° F. (577° C.). There is little solubility of silicon in aluminum at temperatures up to 930° F. (500° C.) and none of aluminum in silicon. However, the solubility can be extended significantly by utilizing rapid solidification techniques.
The binary aluminum magnesium system is a simple eutectic at 36 weight percent magnesium and 842° F. (450° C.). There is complete solubility of magnesium and aluminum in the rapidly solidified inventive alloys discussed herein.
The binary aluminum lithium system is a simple eutectic at 8 weight percent lithium and 1105° (596° C.). The equilibrium solubility of 4 weight percent lithium can be extended significantly by rapid solidification techniques. There is complete solubility of lithium in the rapid solidified inventive alloys discussed herein.
The binary aluminum copper system is a simple eutectic at 32 weight percent copper and 1018° F. (548° C.). There is complete solubility of copper in the rapidly solidified inventive alloys discussed herein.
The aluminum zinc binary system is a eutectic alloy system involving a monotectoid reaction and a miscibility gap in the solid state. There is a eutectic reaction at 94 weight percent zinc and 718° F. (381° C.). Zinc has maximum solid solubility of 83.1 weight percent in aluminum at 717.8° F. (381° C.) which can be extended by rapid solidification processes. Decomposition of the super saturated solid solution of zinc in aluminum gives rise to spherical and ellipsoidal GP zones which are coherent with the matrix and act to strengthen the alloy.
The aluminum nickel binary system is a simple eutectic at 5.7 weight percent nickel and 1183.8° F. (639.9° C.). There is little solubility of nickel in aluminum. However, the solubility can be extended significantly by utilizing rapid solidification processes. The equilibrium phase in the aluminum nickel eutectic system is L12 intermetallic Al3Ni.
In the inventive aluminum based alloys disclosed herein, scandium, erbium, thulium, ytterbium, and lutetium are potent strengtheners that have low diffusivity and low solubility in aluminum. All these elements form equilibrium Al3X intermetallic dispersoids where X is at least one of scandium, erbium, thulium, ytterbium, and lutetium, that have an L12 structure that is an ordered face centered cubic structure with the X atoms located at the corners and aluminum atoms located on the cube faces of the unit cell.
Scandium forms Al3Sc dispersoids that are fine and coherent with the aluminum matrix. Lattice parameters of aluminum and Al3Sc are very close (0.405 nm and 0.410 nm respectively), indicating that there is minimal or no driving force for causing growth of the Al3Sc dispersoids. This low interfacial energy makes the Al3Sc dispersoids thermally stable and resistant to coarsening up to temperatures as high as about 842° F. (450° C.). Additions of magnesium in aluminum increase the lattice parameter of the aluminum matrix, and decrease the lattice parameter mismatch further increasing the resistance of the Al3Sc to coarsening. Additions of zinc, copper, lithium, silicon, and nickel provide solid solution and precipitation strengthening in the aluminum alloys. In the alloys of this invention these Al3Sc dispersoids are made stronger and more resistant to coarsening at elevated temperatures by adding suitable alloying elements such as gadolinium, yttrium, zirconium, titanium, hafnium, niobium, or combinations thereof, that enter Al3Sc in solution.
Erbium forms Al3Er dispersoids in the aluminum matrix that are fine and coherent with the aluminum matrix. The lattice parameters of aluminum and Al3Er are close (0.405 nm and 0.417 nm respectively), indicating there is minimal driving force for causing growth of the Al3Er dispersoids. This low interfacial energy makes the Al3Er dispersoids thermally stable and resistant to coarsening up to temperatures as high as about 842° F. (450° C.). Additions of magnesium in aluminum increase the lattice parameter of the aluminum matrix, and decrease the lattice parameter mismatch further increasing the resistance of the Al3Er to coarsening. Additions of zinc, copper, lithium, silicon, and nickel provide solid solution and precipitation strengthening in the aluminum alloys. In the alloys of this invention, these Al3Er dispersoids are made stronger and more resistant to coarsening at elevated temperatures by adding suitable alloying elements such as gadolinium, yttrium, zirconium, titanium, hafnium, niobium, or combinations thereof that enter Al3Er in solution.
Thulium forms metastable Al3Tm dispersoids in the aluminum matrix that are fine and coherent with the aluminum matrix. The lattice parameters of aluminum and Al3Tm are close (0.405 nm and 0.420 nm respectively), indicating there is minimal driving force for causing growth of the Al3Tm dispersoids. This low interfacial energy makes the Al3Tm dispersoids thermally stable and resistant to coarsening up to temperatures as high as about 842° F. (450° C.). Additions of magnesium in aluminum increase the lattice parameter of the aluminum matrix, and decrease the lattice parameter mismatch further increasing the resistance of the Al3Tm to coarsening. Additions of zinc, copper, lithium, silicon, and nickel provide solid solution and precipitation strengthening in the aluminum alloys. In the alloys of this invention these Al3Tm dispersoids are made stronger and more resistant to coarsening at elevated temperatures by adding suitable alloying elements such as gadolinium, yttrium, zirconium, titanium, hafnium, niobium, or combinations thereof that enter Al3Tm in solution.
Ytterbium forms Al3Yb dispersoids in the aluminum matrix that are fine and coherent with the aluminum matrix. The lattice parameters of Al and Al3Yb are close (0.405 nm and 0.420 mm respectively), indicating there is minimal driving force for causing growth of the Al3Yb dispersoids. This low interfacial energy makes the Al3Yb dispersoids thermally stable and resistant to coarsening up to temperatures as high as about 842° F. (450° C.). Additions of magnesium in aluminum increase the lattice parameter of the aluminum matrix, and decrease the lattice parameter mismatch further increasing the resistance of the Al3Yb to coarsening. Additions of zinc, copper, lithium, silicon, and nickel provide solid solution and precipitation strengthening in the aluminum alloys. In the alloys of this invention, these Al3Yb dispersoids are made stronger and more resistant to coarsening at elevated temperatures by adding suitable alloying elements such as gadolinium, yttrium, zirconium, titanium, hafnium, niobium, or combinations thereof that enter Al3Yb in solution.
Lutetium forms Al3Lu dispersoids in the aluminum matrix that are fine and coherent with the aluminum matrix. The lattice parameters of Al and Al3Lu are close (0.405 nm and 0.419 nm respectively), indicating there is minimal driving force for causing growth of the Al3Lu dispersoids. This low interfacial energy makes the Al3Lu dispersoids thermally stable and resistant to coarsening up to temperatures as high as about 842° F. (450° C.). Additions of magnesium in aluminum increase the lattice parameter of the aluminum matrix, and decrease the lattice parameter mismatch further increasing the resistance of the Al3Lu to coarsening. Additions of zinc, copper, lithium, silicon, and nickel provide solid solution and precipitation strengthening in the aluminum alloys. In the alloys of this invention, these Al3Lu dispersoids are made stronger and more resistant to coarsening at elevated temperatures by adding suitable alloying elements such as gadolinium, yttrium, zirconium, titanium, hafnium, niobium, or mixtures thereof that enter Al3Lu in solution.
Gadolinium forms metastable Al3Gd dispersoids in the aluminum matrix that are stable up to temperatures as high as about 842° F. (450° C.) due to their low diffusivity in aluminum. The Al3Gd dispersoids have a D019 structure in the equilibrium condition. Despite its large atomic size, gadolinium has fairly high solubility in the Al3X intermetallic dispersoids (where X is scandium, erbium, thulium, ytterbium or lutetium). Gadolinium can substitute for the X atoms in Al3X intermetallic, thereby forming an ordered L12 phase which results in improved thermal and structural stability.
Yttrium forms metastable Al3Y dispersoids in the aluminum matrix that have an L12 structure in the metastable condition and a D019 structure in the equilibrium condition. The metastable Al3Y dispersoids have a low diffusion coefficient which makes them thermally stable and highly resistant to coarsening. Yttrium has a high solubility in the Al3X intermetallic dispersoids allowing large amounts of yttrium to substitute for X in the Al3X L12 dispersoids which results in improved thermal and structural stability.
Zirconium forms Al3Zr dispersoids in the aluminum matrix that have an L12 structure in the metastable condition and D023 structure in the equilibrium condition. The metastable Al3Zr dispersoids have a low diffusion coefficient which makes them thermally stable and highly resistant to coarsening. Zirconium has a high solubility in the Al3X dispersoids allowing large amounts of zirconium to substitute for X in the Al3X dispersoids, which results in improved thermal and structural stability.
Titanium forms Al3Ti dispersoids in the aluminum matrix that have an L12 structure in the metastable condition and D022 structure in the equilibrium condition. The metastable Al3Ti despersoids have a low diffusion coefficient which makes them thermally stable and highly resistant to coarsening. Titanium has a high solubility in the Al3X dispersoids allowing large amounts of titanium to substitute for X in the Al3X dispersoids, which result in improved thermal and structural stability.
Hafnium forms metastable Al3Hf dispersoids in the aluminum matrix that have an L12 structure in the metastable condition and a D023 structure in the equilibrium condition. The Al3Hf dispersoids have a low diffusion coefficient, which makes them thermally stable and highly resistant to coarsening. Hafnium has a high solubility in the Al3X dispersoids allowing large amounts of hafnium to substitute for scandium, erbium, thulium, ytterbium, and lutetium in the above mentioned Al3X dispersoids, which results in stronger and more thermally stable dispersoids.
Niobium forms metastable Al3Nb dispersoids in the aluminum matrix that have an L12 structure in the metastable condition and a D022 structure in the equilibrium condition. Niobium has a lower solubility in the Al3X dispersoids than hafnium or yttrium, allowing relatively lower amounts of niobium than hafnium or yttrium to substitute for X in the Al3X dispersoids. Nonetheless, niobium can be very effective in slowing down the coarsening kinetics of the Al3X dispersoids because the Al3Nb dispersoids are thermally stable. The substitution of niobium for X in the above mentioned Al3X dispersoids results in stronger and more thermally stable dispersoids.
Al3X L12 precipitates improve elevated temperature mechanical properties in aluminum alloys for two reasons. First, the precipitates are ordered intermetallic compounds. As a result, when the particles are sheared by glide dislocations during deformation, the dislocations separate into two partial dislocations separated by an anti-phase boundary on the glide plane. The energy to create the anti-phase boundary is the origin of the strengthening. Second, the cubic L12 crystal structure and lattice parameter of the precipitates are closely matched to the aluminum solid solution matrix. This results in a lattice coherency at the precipitate/matrix boundary that resists coarsening. The lack of an interphase boundary results in a low driving force for particle growth and resulting elevated temperature stability. Alloying elements in solid solution in the dispersed strengthening particles and in the aluminum matrix that tend to decrease the lattice mismatch between the matrix and particles will tend to increase the strengthening and elevated temperature stability of the alloy.
Exemplary aluminum alloys for the bimodal system alloys of this invention include, but are not limited to (in weight percent unless otherwise specified):
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-4)Sc-(0.1-20)Gd;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-20)Er-(0.1-20)Gd;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-15)Tm-(0.1-20)Gd;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-25)Yb-(0.1-20)Gd;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-25)Lu-(0.1-20)Gd;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-4)Sc-(0.1-20)Y;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-20)Er-(0.1-20)Y;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-15)Tm-(0.1-20)Y;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-25)Yb-(0.1-20)Y;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-25)Lu-(0.1-20)Y;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-4)Sc-(0.05-4)Zr;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-20)Er-(0.05-4)Zr;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-15)Tm-(0.05-4)Zr;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-25)Yb-(0.05-4)Zr;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-25)Lu-(0.05-4)Zr;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-4)Sc-(0.05-10)Ti;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-20)Er-(0.05-10)Ti;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-15)Tm-(0.05-10)Ti;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-25)Yb-(0.05-10)Ti;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-25)Lu-(0.05-10)Ti;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-4)Sc-(0.05-10)Hf;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-20)Er-(0.05-10)Hf;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-15)Tm-(0.05-10)Hf;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-25)Yb-(0.05-10)Hf;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-25)Lu-(0.05-10)Hf;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-4)Sc-(0.05-5)Nb;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-20)Er-(0.05-5)Nb;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-15)Tm-(0.05-5)Nb;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-25)Yb-(0.05-5)Nb; and
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-25)Lu-(0.05-5)Nb.
M is at least one of about (4-25) weight percent silicon, (1-8) weight percent magnesium, (0.5-3) weight percent lithium, (0.2-3) weight percent copper, (3-12) weight percent zinc, and (1-12) weight percent nickel. CG is a coarse grain ductile aluminum alloy having a particle size of about 25 to about 250 microns.
The amount of silicon present in the fine grain matrix of this invention if any may vary from about 4 to about 25 weight percent, more preferably from about 4 to about 18 weight percent, and even more preferably from about 5 to about 11 weight percent.
The amount of magnesium present in the fine grain matrix of this invention if any may vary from about 1 to about 8 weight percent, more preferably from about 3 to about 7.5 weight percent, and even more preferably from about 4 to about 6.5 weight percent.
The amount of lithium present in the fine grain matrix of this invention if any may vary from about 0.5 to about 3 weight percent, more preferably from about 1 to about 2.5 weight percent, and even more preferably from about 1 to about 2 weight percent.
The amount of copper present in the fine grain matrix of this invention if any may vary from about 0.2 to about 3 weight percent, more preferably from about 0.5 to about 2.5 weight percent, and even more preferably from about 1 to about 2.5 weight percent.
The amount of zinc present in the fine grain matrix of this invention if any may vary from about 3 to about 12 weight percent, more preferably from about 4 to about 10 weight percent, and even more preferably from about 5 to about 9 weight percent.
The amount of nickel present in the fine grain matrix of this invention if any may vary from about 1 to about 12 weight percent, more preferably from about 2 to about 10 weight percent, and even more preferably from about 4 to about 10 weight percent.
The amount of scandium present in the fine grain matrix of this invention if any may vary from 0.1 to about 4 weight percent, more preferably from about 0.1 to about 3 weight percent, and even more preferably from about 0.2 to about 2.5 weight percent. The Al—Sc phase diagram shown in
The amount of erbium present in the fine grain matrix of this invention, if any, may vary from about 0.1 to about 20 weight percent, more preferably from about 0.3 to about 15 weight percent, and even more preferably from about 0.5 to about 10 weight percent. The Al—Er phase diagram shown in
The amount of thulium present in the alloys of this invention, if any, may vary from about 0.1 to about 15 weight percent, more preferably from about 0.2 to about 10 weight percent, and even more preferably from about 0.4 to about 6 weight percent. The Al—Tm phase diagram shown in
The amount of ytterbium present in the alloys of this invention, if any, may vary from about 0.1 to about 25 weight percent, more preferably from about 0.3 to about 20 weight percent, and even more preferably from about 0.4 to about 10 weight percent. The Al—Yb phase diagram shown in
The amount of lutetium present in the alloys of this invention, if any, may vary from about 0.1 to about 25 weight percent, more preferably from about 0.3 to about 20 weight percent, and even more preferably from about 0.4 to about 10 weight percent. The Al—Lu phase diagram shown in
The amount of gadolinium present in the alloys of this invention, if any, may vary from about 0.1 to about 20 weight percent, more preferably from about 0.3 to about 15 weight percent, and even more preferably from about 0.5 to about 10 weight percent.
The amount of yttrium present in the alloys of this invention, if any, may vary from about 0.1 to about 20 weight percent, more preferably from about 0.3 to about 15 weight percent, and even more preferably from about 0.5 to about 10 weight percent.
The amount of zirconium present in the alloys of this invention, if any, may vary from about 0.05 to about 4 weight percent, more preferably from about 0.1 to about 3 weight percent, and even more preferably from about 0.3 to about 2 weight percent.
The amount of titanium present in the alloys of this invention, if any, may vary from about 0.05 to about 10 weight percent, more preferably from about 0.2 to about 8 weight percent, and even more preferably from about 0.4 to about 4 weight percent.
The amount of hafnium present in the alloys of this invention, if any, may vary from about 0.05 to about 10 weight percent, more preferably from about 0.2 to about 8 weight percent, and even more preferably from about 0.4 to about 5 weight percent.
The amount of niobium present in the alloys of this invention, if any, may vary from about 0.05 to about 5 weight percent, more preferably from about 0.1 to about 3 weight percent, and even more preferably from about 0.2 to about 2 weight percent.
In order to have the best properties for the fine grain matrix of this invention, it is desirable to limit the amount of other elements. Specific elements that should be reduced or eliminated include no more than about 0.1 weight percent iron, 0.1 weight percent chromium, 0.1 weight percent manganese, 0.1 weight percent vanadium, and 0.1 weight percent cobalt. The total quantity of additional elements should not exceed about 1% by weight, including the above listed impurities and other elements.
More preferred exemplary aluminum alloys of the bimodal system alloys of this invention include, but are not limited to (in weight percent unless otherwise specified):
about Al-M-(15-40 vol. %)CG-(0.1-3)Sc-(0.3-15)Gd;
about Al-M-(15-40 vol. %)CG-(0.3-15)Er-(0.3-15)Gd;
about Al-M-(15-40 vol. %)CG-(0.2-10)Tm-(0.3-15)Gd;
about Al-M-(15-40 vol. %)CG-(0.3-20)Yb-(0.3-15)Gd;
about Al-M-(15-40 vol. %)CG-(0.3-20)Lu-(0.3-15)Gd;
about Al-M-(15-40 vol. %)CG-(0.1-3)Sc-(0.3-15)Y;
about Al-M-(15-40 vol. %)CG-(0.3-15)Er-(0.3-15)Y;
about Al-M-(15-40 vol. %)CG-(0.2-10)Tm-(0.3-15)Y;
about Al-M-(15-40 vol. %)CG-(0.3-20)Yb-(0.3-15)Y;
about Al-M-(15-40 vol. %)CG-(0.3-20)Lu-(0.3-15)Y;
about Al-M-(15-40 vol. %)CG-(0.1-3)Sc-(0.1-3)Zr;
about Al-M-(15-40 vol. %)CG-(0.3-15)Er-(0.1-3)Zr;
about Al-M-(15-40 vol. %)CG-(0.2-10)Tm-(0.1-3)Zr;
about Al-M-(15-40 vol. %)CG-(0.3-20)Yb-(0.1-3)Zr;
about Al-M-(15-40 vol. %)CG-(0.3-20)Lu-(0.1-3)Zr;
about Al-M-(15-40 vol. %)CG-(0.1-3)Sc-(0.2-8)Ti;
about Al-M-(15-40 vol. %)CG-(0.3-15)Er-(0.2-8)Ti;
about Al-M-(15-40 vol. %)CG-(0.2-10)Tm-(0.2-8)Ti;
about Al-M-(15-40 vol. %)CG-(0.3-20)Yb-(0.2-8)Ti;
about Al-M-(15-40 vol. %)CG-(0.3-20)Lu-(0.2-8)Ti;
about Al-M-(15-40 vol. %)CG-(0.1-3)Sc-(0.2-8)Hf;
about Al-M-(15-40 vol. %)CG-(0.3-15)Er-(0.2-8)Hf;
about Al-M-(15-40 vol. %)CG-(0.2-10)Tm-(0.2-8)Hf;
about Al-M-(15-40 vol. %)CG-(0.3-20)Yb-(0.2-8)Hf;
about Al-M-(15-40 vol. %)CG-(0.3-20)Lu-(0.2-8)Hf;
about Al-M-(15-40 vol. %)CG-(0.1-3)Sc-(0.1-3)Nb;
about Al-M-(15-40 vol. %)CG-(0.3-15)Er-(0.1-3)Nb;
about Al-M-(15-40 vol. %)CG-(0.2-10)Tm-(0.1-3)Nb;
about Al-M-(15-40 vol. %)CG-(0.3-20)Yb-(0.1-3)Nb; and
about Al-M-(15-40 vol. %)CG-(0.3-20)Lu-(0.1-3)Nb.
M is at least one of about (4-18) weight percent silicon, (3-7.5) weight percent magnesium, (1-2.5) weight percent lithium, (0.5-2.5) weight percent copper, (4-10) weight percent zinc, and (2-10) weight percent nickel. CG is a coarse grain ductile aluminum alloy having a particle size of about 50 to about 200 microns.
Even more preferred exemplary aluminum alloys of the bimodal system alloys of this invention include, but are not limited to (in weight percent unless otherwise specified):
about Al-M-(20-30 vol. %)CG-(0.2-2.5)Sc-(0.5-10)Gd;
about Al-M-(20-30 vol. %)CG-(0.5-10)Er-(0.5-10)Gd;
about Al-M-(20-30 vol. %)CG-(0.4-6)Tm-(0.5-10)Gd;
about Al-M-(20-30 vol. %)CG-(0.4-10)Yb-(0.5-10)Gd;
about Al-M-(20-30 vol. %)CG-(0.4-10)Lu-(0.5-10)Gd;
about Al-M-(20-30 vol. %)CG-(0.2-2.5)Sc-(0.5-10)Y;
about Al-M-(20-30 vol. %)CG-(0.5-10)Er-(0.5-10)Y;
about Al-M-(20-30 vol. %)CG-(0.4-6)Tm-(0.5-10)Y;
about Al-M-(20-30 vol. %)CG-(0.4-10)Yb-(0.5-10)Y;
about Al-M-(20-30 vol. %)CG-(0.4-10)Lu-(0.5-10)Y;
about Al-M-(20-30 vol. %)CG-(0.2-2.5)Sc-(0.3-2)Zr;
about Al-M-(20-30 vol. %)CG-(0.5-10)Er-(0.3-2)Zr;
about Al-M-(20-30 vol. %)CG-(0.4-6)Tm-(0.3-2)Zr;
about Al-M-(20-30 vol. %)CG-(0.4-10)Yb-(0.3-2)Zr;
about Al-M-(20-30 vol. %)CG-(0.4-10)Lu-(0.3-2)Zr;
about Al-M-(20-30 vol. %)CG-(0.2-25)Sc-(0.4-5)Ti;
about Al-M-(20-30 vol. %)CG-(0.5-10)Er-(0.4-5)Ti;
about Al-M-(20-30 vol. %)CG-(0.4-6)Tm-(0.4-5)Ti;
about Al-M-(20-30 vol. %)CG-(0.4-10)Yb-(0.4-5)Ti;
about Al-M-(20-30 vol. %)CG-(0.4-10)Lu-(0.4-5)Ti;
about Al-M-(20-30 vol. %)CG-(0.2-2.5)Sc-(0.4-5)Hf;
about Al-M-(20-30 vol. %)CG-(0.5-10)Er-(0.4-5)Hf;
about Al-M-(20-30 vol. %)CG-(0.4-6)Tm-(0.4-5)Hf;
about Al-M-(20-30 vol. %)CG-(0.4-10)Yb-(0.4-5)Hf;
about Al-M-(20-30 vol. %)CG-(0.4-10)Lu-(0.4-5)Hf;
about Al-M-(20-30 vol. %)CG-(0.2-2.5)Sc-(0.2-2)Nb;
about Al-M-(20-30 vol. %)CG-(0.5-10)Er-(0.2-2)Nb;
about Al-M-(20-30 vol. %)CG-(0.4-6)Tm-(0.2-2)Nb;
about Al-M-(20-30 vol. %)CG-(0.4-10)Yb-(0.2-2)Nb; and
about Al-M-(20-30 vol. %)CG-(0.4-10)Lu-(0.2-2)Nb.
M is at least one of about (5-11) weight percent silicon, (4-6.5) weight percent magnesium, (1-2) weight percent lithium, (1-2.5) weight percent copper, (5-9) weight percent zinc, and (4-10) weight percent nickel. CG is a coarse grain ductile aluminum alloy having a particle size of about 100 to 150 microns.
Exemplary aluminum alloys of the trimodal system alloys of this invention include, but are not limited to (in weight percent unless otherwise specified):
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-4)Sc-(0.1-20)Gd-(5-40 vol. %)Al2O3;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-20)Er-(0.1-20)Gd-(5-40 vol. %)Al2O3;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-15)Tm-(0.1-20)Gd-(5-40 vol. %)Al2O3;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-25)Yb-(0.1-20)Gd-(5-40 vol. %)Al2O3;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-25)Lu-(0.1-20)Gd-(5-40 vol. %) Al2O3;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-4)Sc-(0.1-20)Y-(5-40 vol. %)B4C;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-20)Er-(0.1-20)Y-(5-40 vol. %)B4C;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-15)Tm-(0.1-20)Y-(5-40 vol. %)B4C;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-25)Yb-(0.1-20)Y-(5-40 vol. %)B4C
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-25)Lu-(0.1-20)Y-(5-40 vol. %)B4C;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-4)Sc-(0.05-3.0)Zr-(5-40 vol. %)SiC;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-20)Er-(0.05-4.0)Zr-(5-40 vol. %)SiC;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-15)Tm-(0.05-4.0)Zr-(5-40 vol. %)SiC;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-25)Yb-(0.05-4.0)Zr-(5-40 vol. %)SiC;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-25)Lu-(0.05-4.0)Zr-(5-40 vol. %)SiC;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-4)Sc-(0.05-10)Ti-(5-40 vol. %)TiB2;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-20)Er-(0.05-10)Ti-(5-40 vol. %)TiB2;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-15)Tm-(0.05-10)Ti-(5-40 vol. %)TiB2;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-25)Yb-(0.05-10)Ti-(5-40 vol. %)TiB2;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-25)Lu-(0.05-10)Ti-(5-40 vol. %)TiB2;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-4)Sc-(0.05-10)Hf-(5-40 vol. %)TiB;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-20)Er-(0.05-10)Hf-(5-40 vol. %)TiB;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-15)Tm-(0.05-10)Hf-(5-40 vol. %)TiB;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-25)Yb-(0.05-10)Hf-(5-40 vol. %)TiB;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-25)Lu-(0.05-10)Hf-(5-40 vol. %)TiB;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-4)Sc-(0.05-5)Nb-(5-40 vol. %)TiC;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-20)Er-(0.05-5)Nb-(5-40 vol. %)TiC;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-15)Tm-(0.05-5)Nb-(5-40 vol. %)TiC;
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-25)Yb-(0.05-5)Nb-(5-40 vol. %)TiC; and
about Al-M-(10-50 vol. %)CG-(0.1-25)Lu-(0.05-5)Nb-(5-40 vol. %)TiC.
M is at least one of about (4-25) silicon, (1-8) magnesium, (0.5-3) lithium, (0.2-3) copper, (3-12) zinc, and (1-12) nickel. CG is a coarse grain ductile aluminum alloy having a particle size of about 25 to about 250 microns.
The ceramic reinforcements added to create these trimodal system alloys provide additional strength and modulus enhancements which depend on particle size and volume fraction of the ceramic reinforcements.
These L12 bimodal and trimodal alloys may be made using standard powder metallurgy processing wherein the fine rapidly solidified matrix powder is mixed with the coarse ductile phase powder in an inert environment to prevent oxidation. The powder mix is then degassed and compacted in any suitable manner such as, for example, by vacuum hot pressing or blind die compaction (where compaction occurs in both by shear deformation) or by vacuum hot pressing (where compaction occurs by diffusion or creep). The fine grain matrix powder can be made by any rapid solidification technique that can provide elemental supersaturation such as, but not limited to, melt spinning, splat quenching, spray deposition, vacuum plasma spraying, cold spraying, laser melting, mechanical alloying, ball milling (i.e. at room temperature), cryomilling (i.e. in a liquid nitrogen environment), laser deposition, or atomization. Any processing technique utilizing cooling rates equivalent to or higher than about 103° C./second is considered to be a rapid solidification technique for these alloys. Therefore, the minimum desired cooling rate for the processing of these alloys is about 103° C./second, although higher cooling rates may be necessary for the fine grain matrix alloys having larger amounts of alloying additions.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3619181 | Willey | Nov 1971 | A |
3816080 | Bomford et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
4041123 | Lange et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4259112 | Dolowy, Jr. et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4463058 | Hood et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4469537 | Ashton et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4499048 | Hanejko | Feb 1985 | A |
4597792 | Webster | Jul 1986 | A |
4626294 | Sanders, Jr. | Dec 1986 | A |
4647321 | Adam | Mar 1987 | A |
4661172 | Skinner et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4667497 | Oslin et al. | May 1987 | A |
4689090 | Sawtell et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4710246 | Le Caer et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4713216 | Higashi et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4755221 | Paliwal et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4853178 | Oslin | Aug 1989 | A |
4865806 | Skibo et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4874440 | Sawtell et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4915605 | Chan et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4927470 | Cho | May 1990 | A |
4933140 | Oslin | Jun 1990 | A |
4946517 | Cho | Aug 1990 | A |
4964927 | Shiflet et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4988464 | Riley | Jan 1991 | A |
5032352 | Meeks et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5053084 | Masumoto et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5055257 | Chakrabarti et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5059390 | Burleigh et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5066342 | Rioja et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5076340 | Bruski et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5076865 | Hashimoto et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5130209 | Das et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5133931 | Cho | Jul 1992 | A |
5198045 | Cho et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5211910 | Pickens et al. | May 1993 | A |
5226983 | Skinner et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5256215 | Horimura | Oct 1993 | A |
5308410 | Horimura et al. | May 1994 | A |
5312494 | Horimura et al. | May 1994 | A |
5318641 | Masumoto et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5397403 | Horimura et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5458700 | Masumoto et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5462712 | Langan et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5480470 | Miller et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5597529 | Tack | Jan 1997 | A |
5620652 | Tack et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5624632 | Baumann et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5882449 | Waldron et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6139653 | Fernandes et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6149737 | Hattori et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6248453 | Watson | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254704 | Laul et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6258318 | Lenczowski et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6309594 | Meeks, III et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312643 | Upadhya et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6315948 | Lenczowski et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6331218 | Inoue et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6355209 | Dilmore et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6368427 | Sigworth | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6506503 | Mergen et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6517954 | Mergen et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6524410 | Kramer et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6531004 | Lenczowski et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6562154 | Rioja et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6630008 | Meeks, III et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6702982 | Chin et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6902699 | Fritzemeier et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6918970 | Lee et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6974510 | Watson | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7048815 | Senkov et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7097807 | Meeks, III et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7241328 | Keener | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7344675 | Van Daam et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
20010054247 | Stall et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20030192627 | Lee et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040046402 | Winardi | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040055671 | Olson et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040089382 | Senkov et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040170522 | Watson | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040191111 | Nie et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050147520 | Canzona | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060011272 | Lin et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060093512 | Pandey | May 2006 | A1 |
20060172073 | Groza et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060269437 | Pandey | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070048167 | Yano | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070062669 | Song et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080066833 | Lin et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1436870 | Aug 2003 | CN |
101205578 | Jun 2008 | CN |
0208631 | Jun 1986 | EP |
0584596 | Mar 1994 | EP |
1111079 | Jun 2001 | EP |
1249303 | Oct 2002 | EP |
1170394 | Apr 2004 | EP |
1 439 239 | Jul 2004 | EP |
1471157 | Oct 2004 | EP |
1 111 078 | Sep 2006 | EP |
1 728 881 | Dec 2006 | EP |
1 788 102 | May 2007 | EP |
2656629 | Dec 1990 | FR |
2843754 | Feb 2004 | FR |
04218638 | Aug 1992 | JP |
9104940 | Apr 1997 | JP |
9279284 | Oct 1997 | JP |
11156584 | Jun 1999 | JP |
2000119786 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2001038442 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2007188878 | Jul 2007 | JP |
2001144 | Oct 1993 | RU |
2001145 | Oct 1993 | RU |
9002620 | Mar 1990 | WO |
9110755 | Jul 1991 | WO |
9111540 | Aug 1991 | WO |
9532074 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO 9610099 | Apr 1996 | WO |
9833947 | Aug 1998 | WO |
0037696 | Jun 2000 | WO |
0229139 | Apr 2002 | WO |
03052154 | Jun 2003 | WO |
03085145 | Oct 2003 | WO |
03085146 | Oct 2003 | WO |
03104505 | Dec 2003 | WO |
2004005562 | Jan 2004 | WO |
2004046402 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2005045080 | May 2005 | WO |
2005047554 | May 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
BMI. Barkowski Malakoff Inc. The many uses of High Purity Alumina. Technical Specs. http://www.baikowskimalakoff.com/pdf/RC-LS.pdf or http://www.baikowskimalakoff.com/specs.html 2005 (as per MSDS: http://www.baikowskimalakoff.com/pdf/ALUMINA%20-%20BAIKOWSKI%20MALAKOFF.pdf). |
NPL-1: Microstructure of Al3 Sc with ternary transitional metal additions, Materials Science and Engineering A329-331 (2002) pp. 686-695. |
NPL-2: Hardness conversion table down load from http://www.gordonengland.co.uk/hardness/hardness—conversion—2m.htm. |
European Search Report—EP 09251013.0-2122—Dated Jul. 28, 2009—Seven(7) pages. |
“Aluminum and Aluminum Alloys.” ASM Specialty Handbook. 1993. ASM International. p. 559. |
ASM Handbook, vol. 7 ASM International, Materials Park, OH (1993) p. 396. |
Gangopadhyay, A.K., et al. “Effect of rare-earth atomic radius on the devitrification of AI88RE8Ni4 amorphous alloys.” Philosophical Magazine A, 2000, vol. 80, No. 5, pp. 1193-1206. |
Riddle, Y.W., et al. “Improving Recrystallization Resistance in Wrought Aluminum Alloys with Scandium Addition.” Lightweight Alloys for Aerospace Applications VI (pp. 26-39), 2001 TMS Annual Meeting, New Orleans, Louisiana, Feb. 11-15, 2001. |
Lotsko, D.V., et al. “Effect of small additions of transition metals on the structure of Al-Zn-Mg-Zr-Sc alloys.” New Level of Properties. Advances in Insect Physiology. Academic Press, vol. 2, Nov. 4, 2002. pp. 535-536. |
Neikov, O.D., et al. “Properties of rapidly solidified powder aluminum alloys for elevated temperatures produced by water atomization.” Advances in Powder Metallurgy & Particulate Materials. 2002. pp. 7-14-7-27. |
Unal, A. et al. “Gas Atomization” from the section “Production of Aluminum and Aluminum-Alloy Powder” ASM Handbook, vol. 7. 2002. |
Riddle, Y.W. et al. “A Study of Coarsening, Recyrstallization, and Morphology of Microstructure in Al-Sc-(Zr)-(Mg) Alloys.” Metallurgical and Materials Transations A. vol. 35A, Jan. 2004. pp. 341-350. |
Mil'Man, Y.V. et al. “Effect of Addiitional Alloying with Transition Metals on the Structure of an Al-7.1 Zn-1.3 Mg-9.12 Zr Alloy.” Metallofizika I Noveishie Teknohologii, 26 (10), 1363-1378, 2004. |
Tian, N. et al. “Heating rate dependence of glass transition and primary crystallization of Al88Gd6Er2Ni4 metallic glass.” Scripta Materialia 53 (2005) pp. 681-685. |
Litynska, L. et al. “Experimental and theoretical characterization of Al3Sc precipitates in Al-Mg-Si-Cu-Sc-Zr alloys.” Zeitschrift Fur Metallkunde. vol. 97, No. 3. Jan. 1, 2006. pp. 321-324. |
Rachek, O.P. “X-ray diffraction study of amorphous alloys Al-Ni-Ce-Sc with using Ehrenfest's formula.” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 352 (2006) pp. 3781-3786. |
Pandey A B et al, “High Strength Discontinuously Reinforced Aluminum for Rocket Applications,” Affordable Metal Matrix Composites for High Performance Applications. Symposia Proceedings, TMS (The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society), US, No. 2nd, Jan. 1, 2008, pp. 3-12. |
Niu, Ben et al. “Influence of addition of 1-15 erbium on microstructure and crystallization behavior of Al-Ni-Y amorphous alloy” Zhongguo Xitu Xuebao, 26(4), pp. 450-454. 2008. |
Riddle, Y.W., et al. “Recrystallization Performance of AA7050 Varied with Sc and Zr.” Material Science Forum. 2000. pp. 799-804. |
Lotsko, D.V., et al. “High-strength aluminum-based alloys hardened by quasicrystalline nanoparticles.” Science for Materials in the Frontier of Centuries: Advantages and Challenges, International Conference: Kyiv, Ukraine. Nov. 4-8, 2002. vol. 2. pp. 371-372. |
Cook, R., et al. “Aluminum and Aluminum Alloy Powders for P/M Applications.” The Aluminum Powder Company Limited, Ceracon Inc. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090263274 A1 | Oct 2009 | US |