Various example embodiments relate to managing a L4S traffic flow within a passive optical network.
Low latency, low loss, and scalable throughput, also referred to as L4S, is a service that enables senders to transmit L4S packets to a receiver over a network with low queuing latency, low congestion loss, and scalable throughput control. Scalable congestion control is implemented at the sender of the L4S packets in combination with a marking protocol to enable a low latency and high throughput traffic flow for a dedicated L4S service or application, i.e. a service latency and a service bandwidth.
The packets of some traffic flows can travel over a passive optical network, PON, for a leg of their journey between the sender and the receiver, e.g. between a client device and a server. In a PON, packets are transmitted upstream from an optical network unit, ONU, to an optical line terminal, OLT, during scheduled transmission opportunities or bursts. The bandwidth and latency associated with the transmission opportunities are dynamically assigned by a dynamic bandwidth allocation, DBA, engine, according to the network activity within the PON.
The service latency and service bandwidth offered by a L4S service can typically not be guaranteed when the L4S packets travel over a PON, as the L4S traffic flow is hindered by the dynamic bandwidth and latency assignment mechanism of the DBA engine.
The scope of protection sought for various embodiments of the invention is set out by the independent claims. The embodiments and features described in this specification that do not fall within the scope of the independent claims, if any, are to be interpreted as examples useful for understanding various embodiments of the invention.
Amongst others, it is an object of embodiments of the invention to enable upstream transmission of L4S traffic within a passive optical network.
This object is achieved, according to a first example aspect of the present disclosure, by an optical line terminal, OLT, configured to communicate in a passive optical network with optical network units, ONUs, that respectively comprise one or more transmission queues; wherein the OLT comprises a dynamic bandwidth allocation, DBA, engine configured to allocate recurrent transmission opportunities to the respective transmission queues for transmitting packets from the respective transmission queues to the OLT; wherein at least one ONU comprises a L4S transmission queue for transmitting L4S packets with at most a service latency and at least a service bandwidth; and wherein the DBA engine is further configured to perform, identifying a L4S transmission queue based on a L4S traffic descriptor parameter provisioned within the DBA engine.
A transmission queue within an ONU receives data packets from a connected service or application. Data packets within a transmission queue await their turn to be transmitted to the OLT during an allocated recurrent transmission opportunity. A respective transmission queue is thus allowed to transmit data to the OLT during a dedicated transmission opportunity that recurs in time, i.e. during a repeating timeslot.
The L4S transmission queue is a transmission queue that is associated with a L4S service. An L4S service can offer relatively strict guarantees regarding the latency and bandwidth for traffic flows subscribing to the L4S service by leveraging scalable congestion control, e.g. according to TCP Prague. The L4S service is characterized by a service bandwidth, e.g. a minimum bandwidth, and a service latency, e.g. a maximum latency. As such, the L4S service can enable support for latency-critical applications such as, for example, remote control, industry 4.0 applications, extended reality, and cloud gaming.
An operator typically provisions one or more service parameters or traffic descriptor parameters for a transmission queue that ensures the quality of service by imposing constraints on the assigned bandwidth and the latency by the DBA engine. It is a problem to satisfy the service latency and service bandwidth of a L4S service by a typical DBA engine, as the associated L4S transmission queue requires a particular behaviour of the upstream PON link that is not satisfied by typical PON and DBA engine configurations and operation.
To this end, an additional service parameter or traffic descriptor parameter, i.e. the L4S traffic descriptor parameter, is provisioned within the DBA engine. This allows identifying one or more transmission queues within one or more ONUs as L4S transmission queues. This allows the DBA engine to apply a specific allocation strategy or mechanism to the L4S transmission queue that satisfies the expected behaviour of the PON link to support the L4S traffic flow. In other words, the L4S traffic descriptor parameter informs the DBA engine that a certain transmission queue is a L4S transmission queue, which allows modifying the DBA operation applied to the L4S transmission queue. It is an advantage that the additional L4S traffic descriptor parameter can easily be incorporated in existing DBA engines.
According to an example embodiment, the DBA engine may be further configured to perform, if the L4S transmission queue has a queue occupancy larger than a first threshold, allocating recurrent transmission opportunities to the L4S transmission queue that have a first assigned bandwidth for transmitting L4S packets from the L4S transmission queue to the OLT at an interval corresponding to at most the service latency; and wherein the first assigned bandwidth is at least equal to the service bandwidth.
The queue occupancy may, for example, be a queue fill, a queue size, a queue length, a queue backlog, or an amount of L4S packets within the L4S transmission queue. As the first assigned bandwidth is at least equal to the service bandwidth, the first assigned bandwidth guarantees that the bandwidth allocated to the L4S transmission queue meets the service bandwidth of the L4S service associated with the L4S transmission queue. This has the advantage that sufficient bandwidth is assigned to the L4S transmission queue to support end-to-end congestion control protocols of the L4S service. The interval of the recurrent transmission opportunities refers to the time interval between the start of consecutive transmission opportunities. As the DBA engine allocates recurrent transmission opportunities to the L4S transmission queue with an interval that is at most equal to the service latency, the latency of the L4S traffic flow can meet the service latency of the L4S service associated with the L4S transmission queue. It is a further advantage that the allocating of recurrent transmission opportunities for transmitting L4S packets can easily be incorporated in existing DBA engines.
According to an example embodiment, the DBA engine may further be configured to perform, if the L4S transmission queue has a queue occupancy lower than a second threshold, allocating recurrent transmission opportunities to the L4S transmission queue that have a second assigned bandwidth for reporting the queue occupancy of the L4S transmission queue to the OLT.
In other words, recurrent transmission opportunities are allocated to the L4S transmission queue that allow reporting the queue occupancy of the L4S transmission queue to the OLT. This allows monitoring the queue occupancy of the L4S transmission queue by the DBA engine when the L4S transmission queue is not transmitting L4S packets to the OLT, e.g. when the L4S transmission queue is substantially free of L4S packets. This further allows detecting, by the DBA engine, when the queue occupancy exceeds the first threshold and, thus, when recurrent transmission opportunities are to be allocated to the L4S transmission queue for transmitting L4S packets.
The interval between the start of consecutive recurrent transmission opportunities for reporting the queue occupancy may be relatively small, e.g. approximately equal to the L4S service latency. This allows fast detection of L4S packets within the L4S transmission queue by the DBA engine. The second assigned bandwidth may be substantially smaller than the first assigned bandwidth, as the required bandwidth for reporting the queue occupancy is limited. This allows de-allocating a portion of the first assigned bandwidth if the queue occupancy of the L4S transmission queue is lower than the second threshold, i.e. when the first assigned bandwidth is not required for transmitting L4S packets. This has the advantage that the bandwidth efficiency of the PON is improved, as the de-allocated bandwidth can be assigned to other transmission queues within the PON. It has the further advantage that the energy efficiency of the PON can be improved. It is a further advantage that the allocating of recurrent transmission opportunities for reporting the queue occupancy of a L4S transmission queue can easily be incorporated in existing DBA engines.
According to an example embodiment, the queue occupancy may be reported by means of an upstream dynamic bandwidth report, DBRu, structure, or by means of idle data.
The data transmitted from the L4S transmission queue to an OLT during a recurrent transmission opportunity may include a header, a payload, and/or idle data. The queue occupancy of the L4S transmission queue may be reported to the OLT, and thus the DBA engine, by including the queue occupancy within the transmitted data. The queue occupancy can be included in a DBRu structure, i.e. a standardized frame for buffer status reporting in passive optical networks according to the ITU-T G.9807 standard. Alternatively, the queue occupancy may be determined by the DBA engine or OLT based on the activity of the L4S transmission queue as reflected in the idle data, i.e. based on how previously allocated recurrent transmission opportunities are used. For example, idle XGEM frames within an upstream recurrent transmission opportunity can be used to determine the queue occupancy of the L4S transmission queue.
According to an example embodiment, the L4S transmission queue may further transmit other packets.
In other words, the L4S transmission queue may comprise other packets in addition to L4S packets. Other packets may be any non-L4S packets such as, for example, packets of a best-effort service sent according to a protocol that supports classic congestion control. The L4S traffic descriptor parameter may further indicate if a L4S transmission queue is only associated to L4S services or to both L4S services and best-effort services. The ONU comprising the L4S transmission queue and/or the OLT may further be configured to identify packets as L4S packets and other packets. This allows prioritizing the L4S packets over the other packets.
According to an example embodiment, the first assigned bandwidth may be equal to the service bandwidth increased with a surplus bandwidth to support L4S traffic.
The surplus bandwidth allows ensuring that sufficient bandwidth or data rate is available for the L4S service. The surplus bandwidth further allows achieving the intended operation of the scalable congestion control associated with the L4S traffic flow. In other words, the surplus bandwidth ensures that the scalable congestion control is not hindered by the bandwidth assignment of the DBA engine. The surplus bandwidth may be a fixed value or may be updated adaptively.
According to an example embodiment, the OLT may further comprise means configured to perform estimating the surplus bandwidth based on one or more services associated with the L4S transmission queue, and updating the surplus bandwidth.
According to an example embodiment, the first assigned bandwidth may be configured within the DBA engine by an assured information rate.
This allows the assured bandwidth allocated to the L4S transmission queue to be re-allocated to one or more other transmission queues if the L4S transmission queue has a queue occupancy lower than a threshold, e.g. the second threshold. This has the advantage that it improves the scalability of the disclosed bandwidth allocation mechanism, and that it can avoid congestion within the PON as the sum of the assured bandwidth or assured information rate of all transmission queues is guaranteed to be smaller or equal to the PON bandwidth.
According to an example embodiment, the DBA engine is further configured to perform increasing the assigned bandwidth of the recurrent transmission opportunities from the second assigned bandwidth to the first assigned bandwidth upon receiving a reported queue occupancy that exceeds the first threshold.
Recurrent transmission opportunities may be allocated to the L4S transmission queue if the queue occupancy is lower than the second threshold. These recurrent transmission opportunities are used to report the queue occupancy to the OLT. Thus, upon receiving a queue occupancy that exceeds the first threshold, the DBA engine may increase the assigned bandwidth to allow transmission of L4S packets. In other words, the assigned bandwidth of the recurrent transmission opportunity following a transmission opportunity that included the queue occupancy exceeding the first threshold may be increased. This can be achieved by bypassing the typical DBA cycle time of the DBA engine for assigning recurrent transmission opportunities to non-L4S transmission queues. This has the advantage that the latency to activate the bandwidth assignment for transmitting L4S packets is limited.
According to an example embodiment, the DBA engine may further be configured to perform decreasing the assigned bandwidth of the recurrent transmission opportunities from the first assigned bandwidth to the second assigned bandwidth upon receiving a reported queue occupancy that is lower than the second threshold; and wherein the reported queue occupancy is included within the recurrent transmission opportunities for transmitting packets from the L4S transmission queue to the OLT.
In other words, the queue occupancy of the L4S transmission queue may be reported to the OLT within the recurrent transmission opportunities for transmitting L4S packets. This allows monitoring the queue occupancy of the L4S transmission queue by the DBA engine even when L4S packets are being transmitted. After receiving a queue occupancy lower than the second threshold, indicative of a L4S transmission queue that is substantially free of L4S packets, the assigned bandwidth can be reduced to the second assigned bandwidth for monitoring the queue occupancy.
According to an example embodiment, the DBA engine may further be configured to perform postponing the decreasing after receiving a queue occupancy that is lower than the second threshold; and wherein the postponing is based on the queue occupancies included within one or more subsequent recurrent transmission opportunities.
According to a second example aspect, a method is disclosed comprising, by a dynamic bandwidth allocation, DBA, engine, identifying a L4S transmission queue for transmitting L4S packets with at most a service latency and at least a service bandwidth based on a traffic descriptor parameter provisioned within the DBA engine; wherein the DBA engine is included in an optical line terminal, OLT, configured to communicate in a passive optical network with optical network units, ONUs, that respectively comprise one or more transmission queues; and wherein the DBA engine is configured to allocate recurrent transmission opportunities to the respective transmission queues for transmitting packets from the respective transmission queues to the OLT; and wherein at least one ONU comprises a L4S transmission queue.
According to a third example aspect, a computer-implemented method is disclosed comprising, by a dynamic bandwidth allocation, DBA, engine, identifying a L4S transmission queue for transmitting L4S packets with at most a service latency and at least a service bandwidth based on a traffic descriptor parameter provisioned within the DBA engine; wherein the DBA engine is included in an optical line terminal, OLT configured to communicate in a passive optical network with optical network units, ONUs, that respectively comprise one or more transmission queues; and wherein the DBA engine is configured to allocate recurrent transmission opportunities to the respective transmission queues for transmitting packets from the respective transmission queues to the OLT; and wherein at least one ONU comprises a L4S transmission queue.
According to a fourth example aspect, a data processing system is disclosed configured to perform the computer-implemented method according to the third example aspect.
According to a fifth example aspect, a computer program product is disclosed comprising computer-executable instructions which, when the program is executed by a computer, cause the computer to perform the computer-implemented method according to the third example aspect.
Packets 160, 161 travel over PON 101 for a leg of their journey between the respective senders 171-176 and the receiver 180. The PON 101 includes at least one optical line terminal, OLT, 110 and a plurality of optical network units, ONUs, 130, 140, 150. In this example, the OLT 110 is connected to three ONUs 130, 140, 150, however, the OLT 110 may be connected to fewer or more ONUs. The ONUs 130, 140, 150 are connected to the OLT 110 via an optical distribution network, ODN 120. The ODN 120 may have a tree structure comprising an optical feeder fibre 121, one or more passive optical splitters/multiplexors 123, and a plurality of optical distribution fibres or drop fibres that connect the splitter/multiplexor 123 to the respective ONUs 130, 140, 150. In the downstream, the passive optical splitter/multiplexor 123 splits an optical signal coming from the OLT 110 into lower power optical signals for the connected ONUs 130, 140, 150, while in the upstream direction, the passive optical splitter/multiplexor 123 multiplexes the optical signals coming from the connected ONUs 130, 140, 150 into a burst signal for the OLT 110.
The passive optical network 101 may be a Gigabit passive optical network, GPON, according to the ITU-T G.984 standard, a 10× Gigabit passive optical network, 10G-PON, according to the ITU-T G.987 standard, a 10G symmetrical XGS-PON according to the ITU-T G.9807 standard, a four-channel 10G symmetrical NG-PON2 according to the ITU-T G.989 standard, a 25GS-PON, a 50G-PON according to the ITU-T G.9804 standard, or a next generation passive optical network, NG-PON. The passive optical network 101 may implement time-division multiplexing, TDM, or time- and wavelength-division multiplexing, TWDM.
The respective ONUs 130, 140, 150 comprise one or more transmission queues 131, 132, 141, 151, 152, 153 where data packets 160, 161 originating from the connected services 171-176 or applications, i.e. the senders, await their turn to be transmitted to the OLT 110. The one or more transmission queues 131, 132, 141, 151, 152, 153 within the respective ONUs 130, 140, 150 may be transmission containers, also referred to as T-CONT. Transmission containers are ONU-objects that represent a group of logical connections within an ONU 130, 140, 150 that appear as a single entity for the purpose of upstream bandwidth assignment in a passive optical network 101.
Time-division multiplexing, TDM, may be implemented to share the telecommunication medium, i.e. the optical feeder fibre 121, in time between the ONUs 130, 140, 150 in the upstream. To this end, recurrent transmission opportunities 133, 142, 143, 144, 154, 155 are allocated to the respective ONUs 130, 140, 150 during which the respective ONUs 130, 140, 150 are allowed to transmit data to the OLT 110. For example, ONU 140 is allowed to transmit upstream data during the recurrent transmission opportunities 142, 143, 144. The recurrent transmission opportunities 133, 142, 143, 144, 154, 155 may also be referred to as timeslots or bursts.
The recurrent transmission opportunities 133, 142, 143, 144, 154, 155 are allocated by dynamic bandwidth allocation, DBA, sometimes also referred to as dynamic bandwidth assignment. To this end, the OLT 110 comprises a DBA engine 111 that dynamically allocates transmission opportunities to transmission queues. The transmission opportunities 133, 142, 143, 144, 154, 155 can be characterized by a configurable length 146 and a configurable interval 145 between the start of consecutive transmission opportunities. The DBA engine 111 is configured to allocate recurrent transmission opportunities 133, 142, 143, 144, 154, 155 to the transmission queues 131, 132, 141, 151, 152, 153 based on the activity within the transmission queues and one or more traffic descriptor parameters, also referred to as service parameters. These traffic descriptor parameters impose constraints on the bandwidth and the latency that is assigned to respective transmission queues by the DBA engine 111 such that the quality of service for the respective traffic flows can be assured. For example, standard ITU-T G.9807 defines bandwidth-related traffic descriptor parameters ‘committed information rate, CIR’, ‘assured information rate, AIR’, and ‘excessive information rate, EIR’; and a latency-related traffic descriptor parameter ‘delay jitter tolerance, DT’. Traffic descriptor parameters are typically provisioned within the DBA engine 111 by an operator for the respective transmission queues.
The configurable interval 145 of the transmission opportunities, the configurable length 146 of the transmission opportunities, and the assigned bandwidth or data rate define the latency and bandwidth of a traffic flow of a transmission queue between an ONU 130, 140, 150 and the OLT 110. As such, the configuration and the operation of the DBA engine 111 can have a substantial impact on the latency and bandwidth of the end-to-end traffic flow between the senders 171-176 and the receiver 180.
Low latency, low loss, and scalable throughput, also referred to as L4S, is a service that enables internet applications, i.e. senders, to transmit L4S packets to a receiver over a network with low queuing latency, low congestion loss, and scalable throughput control. Scalable congestion control is implemented at the sender of the L4S packets in combination with a marking protocol to enable a low latency and high throughput traffic flow for a dedicated L4S service or application.
Scalable congestion control algorithms apply a reduction of the packet transmission rate proportionally to the amount of reflected marked packets. In scalable congestion control, the average time from one congestion signal to the next, i.e. the recovery time, remains invariant as the flow rate scales. As scalable congestion control allows senders to closely track the link capacity of the network communication node and reduce the queuing delay, low latency communication with limited jitter can be achieved. Scalable congestion control can include, amongst others, BBRv2, TCP Prague, and SCReaM.
In doing so, a L4S service can offer a minimal and stable latency across an end-to-end link. An end-user may subscribe to such a L4S service for latency-critical applications such as, for example, remote control, industry 4.0 applications, extended reality, low latency web browsing and cloud gaming. A L4S service is characterized by a service bandwidth, e.g. a minimum bandwidth, and a service latency, e.g. a maximum latency. The service bandwidth and service latency may also be referred to as service level agreement bandwidth and service level agreement latency, respectively.
It is a problem to continuously satisfy the service latency and the service bandwidth of a L4S service by a typical DBA engine, as the associated L4S traffic flow requires a particular behaviour of the upstream PON link that is not satisfied by the configuration and operation of a typical PON and DBA engine. For example, the bandwidth assigned to a transmission queue 131, 132, 141, 151, 152, 153 within a PON 101 can fluctuate depending on the configuration and the traffic within other transmission queues, which is undesirable for L4S traffic flows. Additionally, the speed of bandwidth changes is limited which can prevent proper functioning of the L4S scalable congestion control by providing insufficient bandwidth at times, or by preventing proper marking of L4S packets. A typical DBA engine 111 may further fail to prioritize L4S traffic over non-L4S traffic. Additionally, the operation of the DBA engine 111 is configured by the provisioned traffic descriptor parameters which may not be aligned with the requirements of a L4S service. It can thus be desirable to enable upstream transmission of L4S traffic within a passive optical network.
According to example embodiments of the present disclosure, this object is achieved by an optical line terminal 110 comprising a DBA engine 111 configured to identify a L4S transmission queue 141 within at least one ONU 140 of a passive optical network 101, based on a L4S traffic descriptor parameter provisioned within the DBA engine. In other words, a dedicated traffic descriptor parameter can be configured or provisioned within the DBA engine for discriminating L4S transmission queues 141 from non-L4S transmission queues 131, 132, 151, 152, 153 in addition to the typical traffic descriptor parameters, e.g. as defined in the ITU-T G.9807 standard.
The L4S transmission queue 141 is a transmission queue that is associated with a L4S service 173. The L4S transmission queue 141 receives L4S packets 160 from the associated L4S service 173. The L4S packets 160 within the L4S transmission queue 141 await their turn to be transmitted to the OLT 110 during the allocated recurrent transmission opportunity 142, 143, 144 associated with the L4S transmission queue 141.
Provisioning the L4S traffic descriptor parameter within the DBA engine 111 thus allows identifying transmission queue 141 as a L4S transmission queue. This allows the DBA engine 111 to apply a specific allocation strategy or mechanism to the L4S transmission queue 141 that satisfies the expected behaviour of the PON link to support the L4S traffic flow. In other words, the L4S traffic descriptor parameter informs the DBA engine 111 that a certain transmission queue is a L4S transmission queue 141, which allows modifying the DBA operation applied to the L4S transmission queue compared to the DBA operation applied to non-L4S transmission queues 131, 132, 151, 152, 153.
The L4S traffic descriptor may be a single bit that is, for example, assigned value 0 to indicate a standard non-L4S transmission queue, and that is assigned value 1 to indicate a L4S transmission queue. Alternatively, the L4S traffic descriptor may include two or more bits to differentiate more classes or types of transmission queues, e.g. a bandwidth critical L4S transmission queue, a bandwidth non-critical L4S transmission queue, a start-up critical L4S transmission queue, and a non-start-up critical L4S transmission queue.
It will further be apparent that a PON 101 may comprise a plurality of ONUs that include a L4S transmission queue 141, and that the L4S traffic descriptor parameter allows identifying the respective L4S transmission queues within the PON 101.
During period 211, the L4S transmission queue 231 may be substantially free of L4S packets 233, i.e. the queue occupancy 220 may be substantially equal to zero. At timestep 241, the L4S transmission queue 231 receives one or more L4S packets 232 which increases the queue occupancy 221 above a first threshold 222. The DBA engine may be configured to allocate recurrent transmission opportunities 202 that have a first assigned bandwidth 205 for transmitting L4S packets 234 from the L4S transmission queue 231 to an OLT when the queue occupancy 221 exceeds this first threshold 222. The first assigned bandwidth 205 may be at least equal to the service bandwidth of the L4S service associated with the L4S transmission queue 231. This guarantees that the bandwidth of the L4S traffic flow meets the service bandwidth of the L4S service. This has the advantage that sufficient bandwidth is assigned to the L4S transmission queue to support end-to-end congestion control protocols of the L4S service.
The interval 203 between the start of consecutive recurrent transmission opportunities 202 may further correspond to at most the service latency of the associated L4S service. This can be achieved by aligning the delay tolerance, DT, traffic descriptor parameter associated with the L4S transmission queue with the L4S service latency. In doing so, the latency of the L4S traffic flow can meet the service latency offered by the L4S service.
During period 212, L4S packets 232 are enqueued in the L4S transmission queue 231 upon reception by an ONU, and L4S packets 234 are dequeued from the L4S transmission queue 231 for transmission to an OLT during the recurrent transmission opportunities 202. The data transmitted from the L4S transmission queue 231 to an OLT during a transmission opportunity 202 may comprise a header 202a, a payload 202c, and idle data 202d. The payload 202c may comprise one or more L4S packets 234. Idle data 201c, 202d may refer to data which carries no information.
The queue occupancy 221 of the L4S transmission queue 231 may be reported to the OLT within the transmitted data during the recurrent transmission opportunities 202. This can be achieved by including the queue occupancy 221 within an upstream dynamic bandwidth report, DBRu, structure 202b. Such a DBRu structure 202b may be included within the header 202a of the transmitted data during a recurrent transmission opportunity 202. The DBRu structure 202b is a standardized frame for buffer status reporting in a passive optical network according to the ITU-T G.9807 standard. Alternatively, the queue occupancy 221 may be included in a dedicated frame, field, or bit of the header 202a.
Alternatively, the queue occupancy 221 may be determined by the DBA engine or OLT based on the activity of the L4S transmission queue 231 as reflected by the idle data 202d within the recurrent transmission opportunities 202, i.e. based on how previously allocated recurrent transmission opportunities are used. For example, idle XGEM frames within a recurrent transmission opportunity 202 can be used to determine the queue occupancy 221 of the L4S transmission queue 231.
At timestep 242, the queue occupancy 221 drops below a second threshold 223 due to the transmission of L4S packets 234 during transmission opportunity 207. The DBA engine may be configured to allocate recurrent transmission opportunities 201 that have a second assigned bandwidth 204 for reporting the queue occupancy of the L4S transmission queue to the OLT if the queue occupancy 221 is lower than the second threshold 223. This allows monitoring the queue occupancy 221 of the L4S transmission queue 231 by the DBA engine when the L4S transmission queue is not transmitting L4S packets to the OLT, e.g. when the L4S transmission queue is substantially free of L4S packets 233 during period 211 and period 213.
The interval 209 between the start of consecutive recurrent transmission opportunities 201 for reporting the queue occupancy may be relatively small, e.g. approximately equal to the L4S service latency. This allows fast detection of L4S packets 233 within the L4S transmission queue 231 by the DBA engine.
The second assigned bandwidth 204 may be substantially smaller than the first assigned bandwidth 205, as the required bandwidth for reporting the queue occupancy 221 is limited. This allows de-allocating a portion of the first assigned bandwidth 205 if the queue occupancy 221 of the L4S transmission queue 231 is lower than the second threshold 223, i.e. when the relatively large first assigned bandwidth is not required for transmitting L4S packets 234. This has the advantage that it improves the bandwidth efficiency of the PON, as the de-allocated bandwidth can be assigned to other transmission queues within the PON. This has the further advantage that the energy efficiency of the PON can be improved.
The queue occupancy 221 of the L4S transmission queue 231 may be reported to the OLT within header 201a and/or idle data 201c transmitted during the recurrent transmission opportunities 201. This can be achieved by including the queue occupancy 221 within a DBRu structure 201b transmitted in the header 201a during a transmission opportunity 201. Alternatively, the queue occupancy 221 may be determined by the DBA engine or OLT based on idle data 201c transmitted during recurrent transmission opportunities 201.
It will be apparent that the second threshold 223 can be smaller than the first threshold 222, equal to the first threshold 222, or larger than the first threshold 222. It will further be apparent that at least one transmission opportunity 208 at the first assigned bandwidth 205 may still be allocated after the queue occupancy 221 has dropped below the second threshold 223 due to the transmission of L4S packets 234 during transmission opportunity 207. Transmission opportunity 208 may report the queue occupancy 221 lower than the second threshold to the DBA engine.
The bandwidth 205 assigned to the L4S transmission queue 231 may be configured within the DBA engine by an assured information rate, AIR, traffic descriptor parameter according to the ITU-T G.9807 standard. An AIR traffic descriptor parameter defines an assured bandwidth for a transmission queue that is guaranteed to be available when the bandwidth is demanded or needed by the transmission queue. In other words, the assured bandwidth for a transmission queue can be assigned to other transmission queues when the transmission queue does not need the bandwidth. This allows the bandwidth allocated to the L4S transmission queue 231 to be re-allocated to one or more other transmission queues if the L4S transmission queue has a queue occupancy 221 lower than a threshold, e.g. the second threshold 223. This has the advantage that it improves the scalability of the disclosed bandwidth allocation mechanism. It has the further advantage that congestion within the PON can be avoided, as the sum of the assured bandwidth of all transmission queues is guaranteed to be smaller or equal to the PON bandwidth.
In doing so, the DBA engine receives an update on the occupancy of the L4S transmission queue with each transmission opportunity 201. While the queue occupancy remains below the first threshold, the DBA engine keeps allocating recurrent transmission opportunities 201 for reporting the queue occupancy. When the queue occupancy exceeds the first threshold in step 322, i.e. when the L4S transmission queue has received a certain amount of L4S packets, the DBA engine increases the assigned bandwidth 204 for reporting the queue occupancy to a bandwidth 205 for transmitting the L4S packets to the OLT in step 323.
The increasing of the assigned bandwidth 204, 205 may be performed upon receiving the queue occupancy that exceeds the first threshold. In other words, the assigned bandwidth of the transmission opportunity following the transmission opportunity that reported the exceeding queue occupancy may be increased. For example, the queue occupancy may exceed the first threshold at timestep 301. The next transmission opportunity 307 reports this exceeding queue occupancy to the OLT, allowing the DBA engine to increase the assigned bandwidth 205 for transmission opportunity 308. This can, for example, be achieved by bypassing the DBA cycle time of the typical DBA engine operation for allocating transmission opportunities for non-L4S traffic.
The assigned bandwidth 205 may be equal to the service bandwidth of the L4S service 305 increased with a surplus bandwidth 306 to support L4S traffic. The surplus bandwidth 306 allows ensuring that sufficient bandwidth or data rate is available for the L4S service. The surplus bandwidth 306 further allows achieving the intended operation of the scalable congestion control associated with the L4S traffic flow. In other words, the scalable congestion control is not hindered by the bandwidth assignment of the DBA engine. The bandwidth 205 assigned to the L4S transmission queue 231 may, for example, be configured within the DBA engine by an assured information rate, AIR, traffic descriptor that equals the L4S service bandwidth increased with the surplus bandwidth 306.
The surplus bandwidth 306 may be a fixed value or may be updated adaptively. Alternatively, the OLT may further comprise means configured to estimate the value of the surplus bandwidth 306 based on the L4S service associated with the L4S transmission queue. The means may further be configured to update the surplus bandwidth 306 based on the estimation.
As discussed in relation to
The stop mechanism may postpone the decreasing of the assigned bandwidth from the bandwidth 205 for transmitting L4S packets to the bandwidth 204 for reporting the queue occupancy after receiving a queue occupancy that is lower than the second threshold. This can, for example, be achieved by initiating a timer or counter in step 325 that resets each time a non-empty L4S transmission queue occupancy is reported. Upon expiry of the timer, the bandwidth assigned to the L4S transmission queue may be decreased in step 326.
For example, at timestep 302 the queue occupancy may drop below the second threshold due to transmission of L4S packets during the preceding transmission opportunity. The reporting of this queue occupancy in transmission opportunity 309 may thus trigger the stop mechanism, i.e. the timer or counter. If the subsequent transmission opportunities 310, 311 do not include a non-zero queue occupancy, the timer or counter expires after period 304 at timestep 303. If subsequent transmission opportunity 310 includes a non-zero queue occupancy, the timer or counter may be reset. In this example (not shown in
Alternatively, the stop mechanism in step 325 may be omitted and the decreasing is performed upon receiving a queue occupancy that is lower than the second threshold. In other words, the bandwidth assigned to the transmission opportunity following the transmission opportunity that reported the exceeding queue occupancy may be decreased.
The OLT 430 may further comprise means 431 configured to perform the L4S-ECN marking to control the rate of the L4S traffic according to scalable congestion control, i.e. by reflecting 441 the amount of marked packets to the sender. Alternatively, the L4S-ECN marking may be performed in a network component located upstream from the OLT 430, e.g. a broadband network gateway.
The bandwidth assigned to these recurrent transmission opportunities may equal the service bandwidth of the L4S service that provides the L4S packets 401 increased with a surplus bandwidth, as discussed in relation to
OLT 530 may comprise a classifier 502 configured to identify L4S packets 401 based on an identifier within the packets, e.g. ECN bits in a header of the packets 401, 402. The OLT 530 may further comprise means 503 configured to perform the L4S-ECN marking to control the rate of the L4S traffic according to scalable congestion control, i.e. by reflecting 441 the amount of marked packets to the sender 410. Alternatively, the L4S-ECN marking may be performed in a network component located upstream from the OLT 530, e.g. a broadband network gateway.
Although the present invention has been illustrated by reference to specific embodiments, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the invention is not limited to the details of the foregoing illustrative embodiments, and that the present invention may be embodied with various changes and modifications without departing from the scope thereof. The present embodiments are therefore to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive, the scope of the invention being indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description, and all changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are therefore intended to be embraced therein. In other words, it is contemplated to cover any and all modifications, variations or equivalents that fall within the scope of the basic underlying principles and whose essential attributes are claimed in this patent application.
It will furthermore be understood by the reader of this patent application that the words “comprising” or “comprise” do not exclude other elements or steps, that the words “a” or “an” do not exclude a plurality, and that a single element, such as a computer system, a processor, or another integrated unit may fulfil the functions of several means recited in the claims. Any reference signs in the claims shall not be construed as limiting the respective claims concerned. The terms “first”, “second”, “third”, “a”, “b”, “c”, and the like, when used in the description or in the claims are introduced to distinguish between similar elements or steps and are not necessarily describing a sequential or chronological order. Similarly, the terms “top”, “bottom”, “over”, “under”, and the like are introduced for descriptive purposes and not necessarily to denote relative positions. It is to be understood that the terms so used are interchangeable under appropriate circumstances and embodiments of the invention are capable of operating according to the present invention in other sequences, or in orientations different from the one(s) described or illustrated above.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
23183366.6 | Jul 2023 | EP | regional |