The present invention relates to label sheets. More particularly, the present invention relates to a design for label sheets in which the labels may be easily removed.
Address labels on printable 8½×11 and A4 sheets have been in use for a number of years as a means of printing a medium to large number of addresses or other information in a relatively short period of time. After the label sheets have been printed, these labels must then be removed from the sheet and applied to an envelope or other substrate. The standard method for removing the labels by hand is that the user bends back the label sheet somewhere in the vicinity of one of the edges or corners of the first label to be removed. This causes a separation between the label and the liner. The user grasps the label in the area where the separation has been created, and removes the label from the sheet. This operation is then repeated for each label. This operation can be somewhat difficult and time consuming, and requires a fair amount of manual dexterity. In addition, some combinations of materials such as a thin or flexible face and thick paper liner can be difficult to die cut without cutting into the liner. When the die cut extends into the liner, the user can accidentally tear off a section of the liner in the process of removing the label from the liner.
Label strips or webs have also been invented for use with automated label removal and placement machinery. U.S. Pat. No. 5,788,284 issued to Hirst discloses a label strip with a cut running down the centerline of the release liner and underneath the center of the individual labels. The label strip moves over a V-shaped notch in a separator plate, thereby automatically separating the labels from the release liner.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,182,152 issued to Ericson discloses a Bible index label dispensing sheet having a weakened line in the backing and fold lines in the individual labels. A release strip overlies the weakened backing line on one side of each horizontal row of labels. The release strip acts as an adhesive tape to prevent premature rupture of the sheet. The user grasps and pulls away the release strip, and tears off the backing from a portion of the horizontal row of labels.
The present invention provides a label sheet assembly which may be fed through a printer such as a laser printer, an ink jet printer, or other printer attached to a personal computer, for desktop printability. Thereafter, a narrow strip of the release liner can be torn off in a single motion. This exposes a narrow strip of each label within a row or column of labels, allowing the labels to be easily removed and placed on some other object or substrate one-by-one. In a label sheet which has a border or matrix surrounding the labels and/or running between the labels or portions of the labels, both the release liner and the matrix have weakened separation lines therein. The separation lines are formed by a series of cuts and ties in the release liner and in the matrix. The ties are preferably strongest near the edges of the sheet and weaker in the interior portion of the sheet. This allows the sheet to resist tearing along the weakened separation lines due to normal handling or printing in the printer, but once the tearing has begun the tearing continues easily until an entire strip of the release liner has been stripped away. A notch is preferably formed in a release liner and the matrix if applicable at each end of the weakened separation line. The notch is aligned with the weakened separation lines in both the liner and in the matrix. The notch helps to ensure that tearing will begin along the weakened separation lines. The two separation lines are sufficiently close together that the user can tear away the strip of release liner from the remainder of the sheet in a single motion without having to remove a separate release strip, and the tearing, once begun, will continue until the release liner is torn entirely away from the remainder of the sheet. The size of the cuts and the size of the ties are chosen so that the assembly is strong enough to be fed through a printer such as a laser printer or an ink jet printer, but weak enough so that the user can tear off the release liner strip along the separation line in an easy and fluid motion without any other mechanical preparation of the label sheet between the printing and the tearing steps. The ratio of cut length to overall separation line length is greater than 95% to ensure ease of separation. Preferably, the separation line lies approximately 0.6 centimeters (approximately ¼ inch) from the edge of a column or column of labels. In this way there is sufficient overhang of the exposed portion of the labels that a user can easily grasp the labels, but a sheet of labels which has had one column or column of labels partially exposed will not have so much exposed adhesive area that the label sheet will readily stick to a desk or other surface on which the label sheet is placed.
In one aspect therefore the invention is of a label sheet assembly modified for easy removal of labels by hand, comprising a release liner and a sheet of facestock material releasably adhered to the release liner, the facestock material including at least a first column of labels formed therein and a matrix at least partially bordering the labels, wherein a first weakened separation line is formed in the release liner below the column of labels and offset from a center of the column of labels toward an edge of the labels, and a second weakened separation line is formed in the matrix running generally parallel to the first weakened separation line. The release liner has a notch aligned with the two weakened separation lines, and preferably a notch at either end of the separation lines. The weakened separation lines are offset from each other by a short distance so that a user can tear off a strip of the liner and a strip of the matrix in a single motion leaving each label within the column of labels with a portion of its liner removed, thereby allowing easy removal of the labels from the label sheet assembly after the tearing operation without the need for the user to perform any other physical preparation of the label sheet between the printing and tearing operations. The weakened separation lines are preferably formed by cuts and ties in the liners and cuts and ties in the matrix when present, with the strongest of the ties being positioned next to the edges of the assembly or the notch when present. For label sheets having multiple columns of labels, the sheet has a weakened separation line in the liner and in the matrix when present below each column of labels.
Exemplary embodiments of the invention will be further described below with reference to the drawings, in which like numbers refer to like parts.
The distance between liner separation line 30 and the cuts and ties 22/24 in the matrix which form matrix separation line 20 is exaggerated in the figures for illustration purposes. The separation lines in the liner and in the matrix are preferably placed close enough together such that, after assembly 10 has been printed on by a printer, a user can tear off the strip 26 of liner and matrix as illustrated in
Both the matrix separation line 20 and the liner separation line 30 run parallel to the edge of a column of labels and disposed about 0.6 centimeters from the edge of the column. The exact distance is not critical. Preferably, however, the separation lines are offset from the edge of the column of labels far enough so that when strip 26 is removed labels 12 can be easily grasped and removed by the user. At the same time, the separation lines are close enough to the edge of the labels such that when strip 26 is removed a narrow enough edge of the labels is exposed so that when the label sheet is placed onto a table or similar surface, the exposed edge of the unremoved labels 12 do not easily and inadvertently stick to the table.
The purpose of these structures will now be described with reference to
Of course, the labels on the label sheet need not be generally rectangular in shape and butting against each other as in the first embodiment shown in
The size of the cuts and the size of the ties are chosen so that the assembly is strong enough to be fed through a printer such as a laser printer or an ink jet printer, but weak enough so that the user can tear off the release liner strip along the separation line in an easy and fluid motion without any other mechanical preparation of the label sheet between the printing and the tearing steps. The ratio of cut length to overall separation line length is greater than 95% to ensure ease of separation. It has been found that an average tensile strength of the facestock and liner along the separation lines of 6 gm/cm produces good results, and it is expected that values of about 4 gm/cm to 10 gm/cm would also produce good results, and that value of about 2 gm/cm to 15 gm/cm would also be acceptable.
As shown, in
In yet another possible embodiment, the label assembly would not even include a matrix bordering the labels. In
In a still further embodiment, the label sheet could be symmetrical. For example, a label sheet could include two columns of labels. For the right hand column of labels, separation lines would be offset slightly from the right hand edge of that right hand column of labels, and for the left hand column of labels, separation lines would be offset slightly from that left hand edge of the left hand column of labels.
Additionally, it will be understood that the present invention can be used with various types and media of labels such as metallic foil, clear plastic, MYLAR®, and other well known materials. The labels could be colored or clear, and could contain pre-printed indicia such as text, two dimensional graphic or photographic images, or holographic images. The invention could be used with a variety of printing devices including but not limited to printers for use with a personal computer.
The present invention is well suited for applications in which the labels will be individually removed by hand. However, the invention is not limited to hand use. The invention could be used with automated machinery for tearing strip 26 away and thereafter placing labels 12 on a substrate. The invention could also be used in applications in which a plurality of labels are to be positioned over one or more substrate objects and applied thereto as a group in the same relative positions on which those labels are found on label assembly 10.
It will be appreciated that the term “present invention” as used herein should not be construed to mean that only a single invention having a single essential element or group of elements is presented. Although the present invention has thus been described in detail with regard to the preferred embodiments and drawings thereof, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that various adaptations and modifications of the present invention may be accomplished without departing from the spirit and the scope of the invention. For example, different sizes of label assemblies could be used, either with or without matrices. The labels could be of various shapes and sizes, and need not all be of the same shape or size. The pressure sensitive adhesive could be weak or strong. The term “standard size” will be understood to mean approximately standard size, and “8½ in.×11 in.” and “A-4” and the like will be understood to mean approximately those sizes. The weakened separation lines could be formed by various known methods. The weakened separation lines are generally linear and parallel, but need not be strictly linear or strictly parallel. Accordingly, it is to be understood that the detailed description and the accompanying drawings as set forth hereinabove are not intended to limit the breadth of the present invention, which should be inferred only from the following claims and their appropriately construed legal equivalents.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/504,600 entitled “LABEL SHEET DESIGN FOR EASY REMOVAL OF LABELS”, filed Aug. 12, 2004, which is the National Stage of International Application No. PCT/US03/05996 entitled “LABEL SHEET DESIGN FOR EASY REMOVAL OF LABELS”, filed Feb. 28, 2003. Both U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/504,600 and International Application No. PCT/US03/05996 are incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
D2856 | Stafford | Dec 1867 | S |
156959 | Taylor | Nov 1874 | A |
D17746 | Mellinger | Sep 1887 | S |
D79566 | Rau | Oct 1929 | S |
D120517 | Steffen | May 1940 | S |
2276297 | Flood | Mar 1942 | A |
2303346 | Flood | Dec 1942 | A |
2304787 | Avery | Dec 1942 | A |
2331019 | Flood | Oct 1943 | A |
2372994 | Welch | Apr 1945 | A |
2420045 | Krug | May 1947 | A |
2434545 | Brady, Jr. et al. | Jan 1948 | A |
D168758 | Odzer | Feb 1953 | S |
2679928 | Bishop, Jr. et al. | Jun 1954 | A |
2681732 | Brady | Jun 1954 | A |
2765205 | Capella et al. | Oct 1956 | A |
2883044 | Kendrick | Apr 1959 | A |
D189472 | Currie et al. | Dec 1960 | S |
D190360 | Cohen et al. | May 1961 | S |
3006793 | Wheeler | Oct 1961 | A |
3038597 | Brady | Jun 1962 | A |
3166186 | Karn | Jan 1965 | A |
3230649 | Karn | Jan 1966 | A |
3230849 | Karn | Jan 1966 | A |
3315387 | Heuser | Apr 1967 | A |
3361252 | Wise | Jan 1968 | A |
3480198 | Repko | Nov 1969 | A |
3568829 | Brady | Mar 1971 | A |
3822492 | Crawley | Jul 1974 | A |
3825463 | Amann | Jul 1974 | A |
3859157 | Morgan | Jan 1975 | A |
3896246 | Brady, Jr. | Jul 1975 | A |
3914483 | Stipek, Jr. | Oct 1975 | A |
3965327 | Ehlscheid et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
4032679 | Aoyagi | Jun 1977 | A |
4060168 | Romagnoli | Nov 1977 | A |
4061808 | Sato | Dec 1977 | A |
4217164 | La Mers | Aug 1980 | A |
4264662 | Taylor et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4356375 | Josephy et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4428857 | Taylor et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4454180 | La Mers | Jun 1984 | A |
4524095 | Gockel et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4537809 | Ang et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4619851 | Sasaki et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4637635 | Levine | Jan 1987 | A |
4648930 | La Mers | Mar 1987 | A |
4704317 | Hickenbotham | Nov 1987 | A |
4706877 | Jenkins | Nov 1987 | A |
4771891 | Sorensen et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4787158 | Vitol | Nov 1988 | A |
4799712 | Biava et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
D300692 | le Brocquy | Apr 1989 | S |
4846504 | MacGregor et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4850612 | Instance | Jul 1989 | A |
4865204 | Vance | Sep 1989 | A |
4881935 | Slobodkin | Nov 1989 | A |
4881936 | Slobodkin | Nov 1989 | A |
D306321 | Gramera | Feb 1990 | S |
4910058 | Jameson | Mar 1990 | A |
4951970 | Burt | Aug 1990 | A |
4952433 | Tezuka et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4978146 | Warther et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4983438 | Jameson | Jan 1991 | A |
5011559 | Felix | Apr 1991 | A |
5031939 | Webendorfer et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5091035 | Anhauser | Feb 1992 | A |
5129682 | Ashby | Jul 1992 | A |
5182152 | Ericson | Jan 1993 | A |
5230938 | Hess et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5284689 | Laurash | Feb 1994 | A |
5318325 | Ipsen | Jun 1994 | A |
5324153 | Chess | Jun 1994 | A |
5328538 | Garrison | Jul 1994 | A |
5332265 | Groess et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5340427 | Cusack | Aug 1994 | A |
5389414 | Popat | Feb 1995 | A |
5407718 | Popat et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5462783 | Esselmann | Oct 1995 | A |
5484168 | Chigot | Jan 1996 | A |
5487915 | Russ et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5509694 | Laurash et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5512343 | Shaw | Apr 1996 | A |
5520990 | Rotermund | May 1996 | A |
5536546 | Nash | Jul 1996 | A |
5601314 | Burns et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5633071 | Murphy | May 1997 | A |
5658631 | Bernstein et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5686159 | Langan | Nov 1997 | A |
5700535 | Galsterer et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5720499 | Sakashita | Feb 1998 | A |
5756175 | Washburn | May 1998 | A |
5782494 | Crandall et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5788284 | Hirst | Aug 1998 | A |
5789050 | Kang | Aug 1998 | A |
5947525 | Pollman | Sep 1999 | A |
5958536 | Gelsinger et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5981013 | Russ et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993928 | Popat | Nov 1999 | A |
5997683 | Popat | Dec 1999 | A |
6001209 | Popat et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6004643 | Scheggetman | Dec 1999 | A |
6132829 | Kennerly et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6136130 | Tataryan et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6170879 | Rawlings | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6277229 | Popat et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6284708 | Oshima et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6361078 | Chess | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6364364 | Murphy | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6391136 | Stickelbrocks | May 2002 | B1 |
6403184 | Michlin | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6410111 | Roth et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6413604 | Matthews et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432499 | Roth et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6479118 | Atkinson | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6579585 | Garvic et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
D471933 | Hodsdon et al. | Mar 2003 | S |
D482073 | Nakajo et al. | Nov 2003 | S |
6656555 | McKillip | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6803084 | Do et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6837957 | Flynn et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6860050 | Flynn et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6861116 | Emmert | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6905747 | Auchter et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6926942 | Garvic et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6955843 | Flynn et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7246823 | Laurash et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7438322 | Miller | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7625619 | Hodsdon et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7627972 | Hodsdon et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7709071 | Wong et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7963564 | Flynn et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7967340 | Hofer et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
20020086127 | Hodsdon et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020096874 | Viby | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030133098 | Hoshino | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040033326 | Tataryan et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040050854 | Presutti et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040078468 | Hedin et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040101646 | Hodsdon et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040101648 | Mulvey et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040166286 | Auchter et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040213943 | Viby | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050089663 | Wong et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050244603 | Hodsdon et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060049625 | Miller | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060110565 | Tataryan et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060147668 | Hirose et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060154012 | Ashton et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060210754 | Presutti et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070114789 | Morrish | May 2007 | A1 |
20080054622 | Hodsdon et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080061548 | Kuranda et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080163973 | Euse | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080264556 | Miller | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090022926 | Dangami | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090029084 | Garrison | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090075010 | Flynn | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090246427 | Hincks et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100080946 | Hodsdon et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100116425 | Konsti et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100233412 | Wong et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1282441 | Jan 2001 | CN |
2257435 | Jun 1973 | DE |
29613123 | Jul 1996 | DE |
0044889 | Feb 1982 | EP |
0297705 | Jan 1989 | EP |
0389112 | Sep 1990 | EP |
0418608 | Mar 1991 | EP |
0488813 | Jun 1992 | EP |
0765514 | Apr 1997 | EP |
1551621 | Jul 2005 | EP |
1597061 | Nov 2005 | EP |
1568013 | May 1969 | FR |
2634931 | Feb 1990 | FR |
2706214 | Dec 1994 | FR |
2724479 | Mar 1996 | FR |
2143204 | Feb 1985 | GB |
2177373 | Jan 1987 | GB |
2179910 | Mar 1987 | GB |
S55-041783 | Mar 1980 | JP |
56-145069 | Nov 1981 | JP |
S56-145069 | Nov 1981 | JP |
S58-103523 | Jun 1983 | JP |
60-11370 | Jan 1985 | JP |
S62-138742 | Jun 1987 | JP |
64-43380 | Mar 1989 | JP |
H01-115773 | Aug 1989 | JP |
5-11575 | Mar 1993 | JP |
07-306641 | Nov 1995 | JP |
08-137403 | May 1996 | JP |
H10-024681 | Jan 1998 | JP |
H10-177344 | Jun 1998 | JP |
H11-007246 | Jan 1999 | JP |
11-030954 | Feb 1999 | JP |
11-045051 | Feb 1999 | JP |
2000-109762 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2001-101827 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2002-82615 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2004-034673 | Feb 2004 | JP |
2005-128458 | May 2005 | JP |
2004-569155 | Apr 2006 | JP |
4029353 | Oct 2007 | JP |
9219457 | Nov 1992 | WO |
9534879 | Dec 1995 | WO |
9701495 | Jan 1997 | WO |
99031644 | Jun 1999 | WO |
0032412 | Aug 2000 | WO |
0184550 | Aug 2001 | WO |
0184550 | Nov 2001 | WO |
0189825 | Nov 2001 | WO |
02026483 | Apr 2002 | WO |
04078468 | Sep 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Supplemental European Search Report dated Oct. 4, 2007 from European Application No. 03713742.9. |
International Search Report dated Aug. 22, 2003 from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2003/05996. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Oct. 21, 2004 from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2003/05996. |
Observations by Third Parties under Article 115 EPC filed on Oct. 20, 2009 by Mintz Levin from corresponding European Application No. 03713742.9. |
Notice of acceptance dated Nov. 5, 2008 from corresponding Australian Application No. 200321779. |
Office action dated Apr. 15, 2010 from corresponding Australian Divisional Application No. 2008243283. |
Office action dated Oct. 1, 2009 from corresponding Canadian Application No. 2,512,250. |
Amendment dated Apr. 1, 2010 from corresponding Canadian Application No. 2,512,250. |
Office action dated Jul. 25, 2008 from corresponding Chinese Application No. 03826036.0. |
Amendment dated Nov. 18, 2008 from corresponding Chinese Application No. 03826036.0. |
Notice of grant dated Jun. 24, 2009 from corresponding Chinese Application No. 03826036.0. |
Voluntary amendment dated Dec. 3, 2009 from corresponding Divisional Chinese Application No. 200910006342.3. |
Office action dated Mar. 10, 2010 from corresponding Chinese Divisional Application No. 200910006342.3. |
Office action dated Jan. 2, 2008 from corresponding European Application No. 03713742.9. |
Amendment dated May 12, 2008 from corresponding European Application No. 03713742.9. |
Office action dated Apr. 15, 2010 from corresponding European Application No. 03713742.9. |
Office action dated May 9, 2006 from corresponding Japanese Application No. 2004/569155. |
Amendment dated Aug. 10, 2006 from corresponding Japanese Application No. 2004/569155. |
Notice of allowance dated Aug. 30, 2007 from corresponding Japanese Application No. 2004/569155. |
Office action dated Feb. 16, 2010 from corresponding Japanese Divisional Application No. 2007212089. |
Office action dated Aug. 8, 2006 from Prior U.S. Appl. No. 10/504,600. |
Amendment dated Oct. 31, 2006 from Prior U.S. Appl. No. 10/504,600. |
Final rejection dated Jan. 19, 2007 from Prior U.S. Appl. No. 10/504,600. |
Request for continued examination and amendment dated Apr. 17, 2007 from Prior U.S. Appl. No. 10/504,600. |
Office action dated Jul. 2, 2007 from Prior U.S. Appl. No. 10/504,600. |
Amendment dated Oct. 31, 2007 from Prior U.S. Appl. No. 10/504,600. |
Final rejection dated Jan. 9, 2008 from Prior U.S. Appl. No. 10/504,600. |
Notice of appeal and request for pre-appeal brief conference dated Apr. 9, 2008 from Prior U.S. Appl. No. 10/504,600. |
Notice of pre-appeal brief review panel decision dated May 8, 2008 from Prior U.S. Appl. No. 10/504,600. |
Restriction requirement dated Jul. 28, 2008 from Prior U.S. Appl. No. 10/504,600. |
Response to restriction requirement dated Aug. 27, 2008 from Prior U.S. Appl. No. 10/504,600. |
Request for Ex Parte Re-examination, Control No. 90/010,762, dated Dec. 7, 2009 in U.S. Pat. No. 6,860,050. |
Order dated Jan. 27, 2010 granting request for re-examination in Control No. 90/010,762. |
Office action dated May 26, 2010 from re-examination Control No. 90/010,762. |
Examiner's interview summary dated Jun. 25, 2010 from re-examination Control No. 90/010,762. |
Amendment, information disclosure statement, and patent owner's statement of substance of interview dated Jul. 1, 2010 from re-examination Control No. 90/010,762. |
Avery Dennison Corp. v. Continental Datalabel, Inc., 1:10CV-2744 (N.D. III.), complaint dated May 4, 2010. |
Avery Dennison Corporation v. 3M complaint dated May 4, 2010. |
Continental Datalabel, Inc. v. Avery Dennison Corporation, 1:09-cv-5980, complaint dated Sep. 28, 2009. |
Information disclosure statement dated Jul. 28, 2010 from re-examination Control No. 90/010,762. |
Avery Dennison Corporation v. Continental DataLabel, Inc., Answer to Complaint dated Jun. 25, 2010. |
Avery Dennison Corporation v. Continental DataLabel, Inc., Initial Disclosures of Defendant dated Aug. 6, 2010. |
Avery Dennison Corporation v. Continental DataLabel, Inc., pertinent document, Bates Nos. LC0000001 to LC0000035, cited in Initial Disclosures of Defendant dated Aug. 6, 2010. |
Avery Dennison Corporation v. Continental DataLabel, Inc., pertinent document, Bates Nos. LC0000036 to LC0000078, cited in Initial Disclosures of Defendant dated Aug. 6, 2010. |
Avery Dennison Corporation v. Continental DataLabel, Inc., pertinent document, Bates Nos. LC0000079 to LC0000108, cited in Initial Disclosures of Defendant dated Aug. 6, 2010. |
Avery Dennison Corporation v. Continental DataLabel, Inc., pertinent document, Bates Nos. LC0000109 to LC0000128, cited in Initial Disclosures of Defendant dated Aug. 6, 2010. |
Avery Dennison Corporation v. Continental DataLabel, Inc., pertinent document, Bates Nos. LC0000129 to LC0000148, cited in Initial Disclosures of Defendant dated Aug. 6, 2010. |
Office action dated Jun. 19, 2010 from Reexamination Control No. 95/001,351. |
Request for ex parte reexamination dated Dec. 7, 2009 from Reexamination Control No. 90/010,761. |
Order granting reexamination dated Feb. 19, 2010 from Reexamination Control No. 90/010,761. |
Office action dated Jul. 8, 2010 from Reexamination Control No. 90/010,761. |
Amendment dated Aug. 18, 2010 from Reexamination Control No. 95/001,351. |
Office action dated Nov. 26, 2008 from Prior U.S. Appl. No. 10/504,600. |
Amendment dated Feb. 24, 2009 from Prior U.S. Appl. No. 10/504,600. |
Final rejection dated May 5, 2009 from Prior U.S. Appl. No. 10/504,600. |
Request for continued examination and amendment dated Nov. 5, 2009 from Prior U.S. Appl. No. 10/504,600. |
Examiner interview summary dated Nov. 24, 2009 from Prior U.S. Appl. No. 10/504,600. |
Applicant statement of substance of interview dated Dec. 3, 2009 from Prior U.S. Appl. No. 10/504,600. |
Examiner interview summary dated Dec. 29, 2009 from Prior U.S. Appl. No. 10/504,600. |
Applicant statement of substance of interview dated Jan. 4, 2010 from Prior U.S. Appl. No. 10/504,600. |
Amendment dated Jan. 12, 2010 from Prior U.S. Appl. No. 10/504,600. |
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 12, 2010 from Prior U.S. Appl. No. 10/504,600. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 12, 2010 from corresponding Canadian Application No. 2512250. |
International preliminary report on patentability dated Jun. 2, 2010 from related International Application No. PCT/US2009/041586. |
International search report and written opinion dated Dec. 4, 2009 from related International Application No. PCT/US2009/041586. |
Lawyer's seal “A” Dennison Mfg Co. 1913-1914 Tags & Speciatlies Catalog P. 71, (Feb. 17, 2005 List of references in U.S. Pat. No. D514164). |
Starburst Graphic #22 Admart Brochure Admart 20 Gose Pkie Danville KY 40422, (Feb. 17, 2005 List of references in U.S. Pat. No. D514164). |
Chapter II Demand and A34 Amendment dated Mar. 3, 2010 from related International patent application No. PCT/US2009/041586. |
Amendment dated Aug. 16, 2010 from related Japanese Patent Application No. 2007-212089. |
Response dated Aug. 23, 2010 from related European Patent Application No. 03713742.9. |
Third Party Comments dated Sep. 17, 2010 After Non-final Action in Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,709,071. |
Exhibit dated Sep. 17, 2010 Filed by Third Party (Exhibit A) in Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,709,071. |
Exhibit dated Sep. 17, 2010 Filed by Third Party (Exhibit B) in Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,709,071. |
Information Disclosure Statement dated Sep. 17, 2010 Filed by Third Party in Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,709,071. |
Response dated Oct. 3, 2010 from related Chinese Divisonal Patent Application No. 200910006342.3. |
Office Action dated Nov. 1, 2010 from related Chinese Divisonal Patent Applicatoin No. 200910006342.3. |
Reponse dated Nov. 1, 2010 After Non-final Action in Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,709,071. |
“Office Action for Japanese Patent dated Mar. 31, 2011.”, In Application No. 2007-212089., 3 Pgs. |
“Reexamination Petition Decision dated Mar. 17, 2011.”, For U.S. Pat. No. 6,860,050. |
“Request for Reinstatement and Amendment dated Mar. 25, 2011.”, For Canadian Patent Application No. 2,512,250., 36 Pgs. |
“Response After Non-final Action dated Aug. 19, 2011.”, For U.S. Pat. No. 6,860,050 Control No. 95/001,608., pp. 1-62. |
“Response to Extended Search Report dated Jul. 19, 2011.”, In European Patent Application No. 10009035.6., 16 Pgs. |
“Response to Restriction Requirement and Amendment dated Aug. 8, 2011 .”, In U.S. Appl. No. 12/429,166., pp. 1-5. |
“Rexamination Certificate dated Mar. 22. 2011.”, For U.S. Pat. No. 6,860,050 Control No. 90/010,762., 8 Pgs. |
“Second Amendment After Final Rejection for Reexamination dated Nov. 22, 2010.”, For U.S. Pat. No. 6,860,050 Control No. 90/010,762., pp. 1-56. |
“Supplemental Amendment After Final Rejection dated Jul. 13, 2011.”, In Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,837,957 Control No. 90/010,761., 8 Pgs. |
“Third Party Requestor Comments After Non-final Action dated Sep. 15, 2011.”, For Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,860,050 Control No. 95/001,608, 34 Pgs. |
Continental Opposition to Avery Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims 3-5 dated Oct. 5, 2010, Motion, Exhibits A-J, and Declaration for Avery Dennison Corporation v. Continental Datalabel, Inc. |
Non-final Office Action dated Jun. 16, 2011 for Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,860,050 (95/001,608). |
Office Action dated Oct. 21, 2011 for Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,709,071 (95/001,351). |
“Advisory Action for Reexamination dated Nov. 12, 2010.”, For U.S. Pat. No. 6,860,050 Control No. 90/010,762., 4 Pgs. |
“Amendment After Final Office Action dated Oct. 27, 2010.”, For Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,860,050 Control No. 90/010,762., 49 Pgs. |
“Amendment after Final Rejection dated Jun. 29, 2011.”, In Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,837,957 Control No. 90/010,761. |
“Amendment After Non-final Office Action dated Sep. 13, 2010 .”, For Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,837,957 Control No. 90/010,761., 38 Pgs. |
“Appeal Brief and Amendment dated Aug. 4, 2011.”, In Japanese Patent Application No. 2007-212089., 18 Pgs. |
“Appeal Brief dated Oct. 31, 2011.”, For Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,837,957 Control No. 90/010,761, pp. 1-38. |
“Avery Answer to Counterclaims 1 and 2 dated Sep. 9, 2010.”, In Case No. 1:10-cv-2744; Avery Dennison Corp. v. Continental Datalabel, Inc., 21 Pgs. |
“Avery Answer to First Amended Complaint and Counterclaims dated Nov. 18, 2009.”, In Case No. 1:09-cv-05980; Continental Datalabel, Inc. v. Avery Dennison Corporation., 31 Pgs. |
“Avery Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims 3-5 Memorandum, and Exhibits dated Sep. 9, 2010.”, In Avery vs. Continental; Civil Action No. 1:10-cv-2744. |
“Avery Motion to Stay all Causes of Action, Memorandum, and Exhibits A-E dated Jul. 9, 2010.”, In Avery Dennison Corporation vs. Continental Datalabel; Civil Action No. 1:10-cv-2744. |
“Avery Objections and Responses to Continental's First Document Request dated Oct. 27, 2010.”, In Civil Action No. 1:10-CV-2744; Avery Dennison Corp. v. Continental Datalabel, Inc. |
“Avery Objections and Responses to Continental's First Interrogatories Dated Oct. 27, 2010.”, In Civil Action No. 1:10-cv-2744; Avery Dennison Corp. v. Continental Datalabel. |
“Avery Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims 3-5 and Exhibits 1-4 dated Oct. 15, 2010.”, In Civil Action No. 1:10-cv-2744; Avery Dennison Corp. v. Continental Datalabel. |
“Avery Reply in Support of Motion to Stay All Causes of Action dated Aug. 13, 2010 .”, In Civil Action No. 1:10-cv-2744; Avery Dennison Corp. v. Continental Datalabel, Inc., pp. 1-10. |
“Avery Response to Initial Invalidity Contentions Oct. 1, 2010.”, In Civil Action No. 1:10-cv-2744; Avery Dennison Corporation v. Continental Datalabel, Inc., pp. 1-9. |
“Continental Initial Non-infringement Contentions and Exhibit A”, for Avery Dennison Corporation v. Continental Datalabel, Inc. dated Sep. 17, 2010., 260 Pgs. |
“Continental Opposition to Avery Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims 3-5 dated Oc. 5, 2010. Motion, Exhibits A-J, and Declaration”, In Civil Case No. 1:10-cv-2744; Avery Dennison Corp. v. Continental Datalabel, Inc. |
“Continental Opposition to Avery Motion to Stay All Causes of Action dated Jul. 30, 2010, Exhibits A-J”, In Civil Action No. 1:10-cv-2744; Avery Dennison Corp. v. Continental Datalabel, Inc., 91 Pgs. |
“Court Opinion Regarding Dismissal of Counterclaims 3, 4, and 5 dated Nov. 30, 2010 .”, IN Case No. 1:10-cv-02744; Avery Dennison Corp. vs. Continental Datalabel, Inc. |
“First Amended Complaint and Exhibits A-E dated Oct. 21, 2009.”, In Case No. 1:10-cv-02744; Avery Dennison v. Continental Datalabel, Inc. |
“Letter to Douglas H. Pauley from Robert W. Unikel dated Nov. 10, 2010.”, pp. 1-16. |
“Letter to Douglas H. Pauley from Robert W. Unikel dated Sep. 30, 2010.”, pp. 1-8. |
“Letter to Douglas H. Pauley from Robert W. Unikel.”, date Jul. 23, 2010., pp. 1-7. |
“Letter to Robert W. Unikel from Maxwell J. Petersen dated Apr. 26, 2010.”, pp. 1-2. |
“Michael Fairley; Enclosure to Letter to D. H. Pauley dated Nov. 10, 2010.”, Illustrated Encyclopedia of Labels and Label Technology, Tauras Publishing Ltd., London, First Published 2004., 6 pages. |
“Canadian Office Action dated May 26, 2011.”, In CA application No. 2,512,250., 2 Pgs. |
Amendment under A19 with replacement sheets dated Oct. 16, 2003 from International Application No. PCT/US03/005996. |
“Chinese Office Action Response dated Mar. 11, 2011.”, In Application No. 200910006342.3., 4 Pgs. |
“European Examination Report dated Nov. 3, 2011.”, For European Patent Application No. 10009035.6., pp. 1-8. |
“Examiner Interview Summary dated Jul. 1, 2011.”, In Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,837,957 Control No. 90/010,761.,4 Pgs. |
“Examiner Interview Summary dated Oct. 29, 2010.”, For Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,860,050 Control No. 90/010,762., 4 Pgs. |
“Examiner Interview Summary dated Sep. 1, 2010 .”, For Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,837,957 Control No. 90/010,761., 4 Pgs. |
“Extended Search Report dated Dec. 23, 2010.”, For European Patent Application No. 10009035.6., 8 Pgs. |
“Final Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2010.”, For Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,860,050 U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,762., 26 Pgs. |
“Final U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 29, 2011.”, In U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,761, 16 Pgs. |
“Inter Partes Reexamination Request dated Apr. 21, 2011.”, For U.S. Pat. No. 6,860,050. |
“Letter Requesting Interview Summary with Examiner dated Aug. 27, 2010.”, In Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,837,957 Control No. 90/010,761., 19 Pgs. |
“Letter Requesting Interview with Examiner dated Jun. 22, 2011.”, In Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,837,957 Control No. 90/010,761., 2 Pgs. |
“Miscellaneous Incoming Letter for Reexamination dated Aug. 27, 2010 .”, In U.S. Pat. No. 6,837,957 Control No. 90/010,761., Pgs. 1-15. |
“Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 17, 2011.”, In U.S. Appl. No. 12/429,166., 9 Pgs. |
Chapter II demand dated Aug. 5, 2004 from International Application No. PCT/US03/05996. |
“Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 25, 2011.”, In U.S. Appl. No. 12/429,166., 9 Pgs. |
“Notice of Abandonment dated Apr. 6, 2011.”, For Canadian Patent Application No. 2,512,250., 2 Pgs. |
“Notice of Acceptance dated Apr. 21, 2011.”, For Australian Divisional Application No. 2008243283., 3 Pgs. |
“Notice of Appeal for Reexamination date Aug. 29, 2011 .”, In U.S. Pat. No. 6,837,957 Control No. 90/010,761., 2 Pgs. |
“Notice of Incomplete Ex Parte Reexamination Request dated Jan. 18, 2011.”, In U.S. Pat. No. 6,860,050 Control No. 90/010,762., 4 Pgs. |
“Notice of Intent to Issue a Reexamination Certificate dated Dec. 16, 2010.”, Forr U.S. Pat. No. 6,860,050 Control No. 90/010,762., 12 Pgs. |
“Notice of Reinstatement dated Apr. 20, 2011.”, For Canadian Patent Application No. 2,512,250., 2 Pgs. |
Inter Partes Request for Re-examination filed on May 4, 2010 in U.S. Pat. No. No. 7,709,071. |
Interview Response and Amendment dated Feb. 10, 2010 from U.S. Pat. No. 7,709,071. |
Notice of Allowability dated Feb. 11, 2010 from U.S. Pat. No. 7,709,071. |
Examiner-Initiated Interview Summary for interview on Feb. 9, 2010 from U.S. Pat. No. 7,709,071. |
Interview Response dated Jan. 12, 2010 from U.S. Pat. No. 7,709,071. |
Claim Chart applying U.S. Pat. No. 2,681,732 and secondary references to the claims of U.S. Pat. No. 7,709,071. |
Claim Chart applying U.S. Pat. No. 3,568,829 and secondary references to the claims of U.S. Pat. No. 7,709,071. |
Claim Chart applying U.S. Pat. No. 3,038,597 and secondary references to the claims of U.S. Pat. No. 7,709,071. |
Claim Chart applying JP Patent No. 56-145069 and secondary references to the claims of U.S. Pat. No. 7,709,071. |
Claim Chart applying EP Patent No. 0488813 and secondary references to the claims of U.S. Pat. No. 7,709,071. |
Claim Chart applying WO 95/34879 and secondary references to the claims of U.S. Pat. No. 7,709,071. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100233412 A1 | Sep 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10504600 | US | |
Child | 12729139 | US |