Not Applicable
Not Applicable
The invention is related to devices for fastening and keeping fastened laces, chords, ropes, strings and alike.
Many devices were invented for shoe lace tightening. The most commercially successful is U.S. Pat. No. 6,339,867 by Azam which is widely used in fastening laces of skiing and skates boots. The tightening principle is a spring loaded gear wheel which can move in wedge shaped passage which widens forwards and narrows backwards. The laces pass through that passage and can be fastened by pulling the laces forwards which in turn pulls forwards the gear wheel towards the wider part of the passage where the laces are free to move. When the pulling stops the laces pull the gear wheel backwards, which narrows the passage and blocks the laces' backwards motion. The laces can be released by pulling the gearwheel forwards with a knob. There are few noticeable disadvantages to this popular invention. The device must be installed on heavy-solid footwear which eliminates its use with regular shoes and the user must constantly pull the knob to keep the releasing. In addition, the teeth of gearwheel and opposite teeth cause severe lace wear. Similar approach is taken in U.S. Pat. No. 7,360,282 by Borsoi and in U.S. Pat. No. 8,141,273 by Stramare. The lace buckle device described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,334,240 by Li is used widely in coat laces. It has a lace passage controlled by a spring loaded piston that blocks lace motion when the spring is released. Except for the similar name there is no similarity to our invention. This buckle controls only one lace and does not have a ratchet operation at all. When the user wants to release or fasten the lace the user has to press the spring loaded piston, release the lace and pull at the same time. When the spring is released, the buckle returns to b the lace. Similar devices are sold as “shoe buckles” for fastening shoe laces. The main disadvantage of such shoe buckles is that they do not have a ratcheting operation, which enables one to fasten the laces just by pulling. The shoe buckles require one to fasten the laces with one hand while keeping the buckle in position with the other hand and then switching the buckle into position. This results in cumbersome and inefficient fastening.
In U.S. Pat. No. 6,729,000 Liu uses for lace tightening a teethed rotating bar. In U.S. Pat. No. 6,076,241 by Borel and in several others such as in U.S. Pat. No. 6,622,358 to Christy and in U.S. Pat. No. 6,192,241 by Yu et al. use fastening devices which are based on pipes or channels which have diagonal teeth to block reverse motion of the lace. The pipes are installed on the shoes in different locations.
In U.S. Pat. No. 8,371,004 Huber teaches a lace mechanism. Huber's mechanism employs a pair of spring loaded pivoted arms which have sets of sharp teeth that when pressed against the laces block their motion in both directions. Thus, Huber's mechanism is not a lace ratchet mechanism because it does not allow further lace tightening once it is. In its state, the laces are released in both directions simply by pressing the arms of Huber's mechanism. Huber's mechanism is impractical because the sharp teeth tend to cause a lot of lace wear when the laces are fastened before. Huber's mechanism structure is complex and expensive to manufacture. In addition, similar to the lace buckle, the user needs to fasten both laces with one hand while pressing the arms with the second hand to keep the mechanism in position. In U.S. Pat. No. 8,332,994 Jih-Liang Lin teaches a shoe lace fastener which fasten the lace using jagged arm on top and jagged base on bottom. The device structure includes many complex parts and is expensive to manufacture. Such a structure also is impractical because it will wear the lace very quickly. In U.S. Pat. No. 8,381,362 to Hammerslag et al. teaches Real based closure system. U.S. Pat. No. 8,332,994 to Lin teaches Shoelace with shoelace fastener. U.S. Pat. No. 8,141,273 to Stramare et al. describes Shoes with directional conditioning device for laces. U.S. Pat. No. 8,231,074 to Hu et al. describes Lace winding device for shoes. U.S. Pat. No. 8,230,560 to Luzlbauer teaches Fastening system for shoes.
U.S. Pat. No. 9,185,948 to Ben-Arie describes a Buckle Lace Fastening Device (BLFD) which also enables lace ratcheting. However, the BLFD is using resilient gates which do not rotate but bend. In addition, the mechanism of the BLFD, which is based on rotating the gripping wall is entirely different from the mechanism of the current invention.
U.S. Pat. No. 8,046,937 to Beers et al. describes an Automatic lacing system. U.S. Pat. No. 7,681,289 to Liu describes a Fastener for fasting together two lace systems. U.S. Pat. No. 7,591,050 to Hammerslag describes a Footwear lacing system. U.S. Pat. No. 7,320,161 to Taylor describes a Lace tying device. U.S. Pat. No. 7,313,849 to Liu describes a Fastener for lace. U.S. Pat. No. 7,152,285 to Liao describes a Shoe lace fastening device. U.S. Pat. No. 7,082,701 to Dalgaard describes Footwear variable tension lacing systems. U.S. Pat. No. 6,938,308 Funk describes a lace securing and adjusting device. U.S. Pat. No. 6,735,829 Hsu describes a U shaped lace buckle. In U.S. Pat. No. 6,588,079 to Manzano describes a Shoelace fastening assembly. U.S. Pat. No. 6,438,871 to Culverwell describes Footwear fastening. U.S. Pat. No. 6,192,559 to Munsell Jr. describes a Shoelace fastening apparatus. U.S. Pat. No. 6,094,787 to Chang describes a Fastening device. U.S. Pat. No. 5,572,777 to Shelton describes a Shoelace tightening device. U.S. Pat. No. 5,572,774 to Duren teaches a Shoe fastening attached device. U.S. Pat. No. 5,467,511 to Kubo describes a Shoelace fastening device. U.S. Pat. No. 5,335,401 to Hanson teaches a Shoelace tightening and device. U.S. Pat. No. 5,295,315 to Osawa et al. describes a Shoe fastening device and plate shaped member thereof. U.S. Pat. No. 5,293,675 to Shai describes a Fastener for shoelace. U.S. Pat. No. 5,293,669 to Sampson teaches a Multiuse fastener system. U.S. Pat. No. 5,230,171 to Cardaropoli teaches a Shoe fastener. U.S. Pat. No. 5,203,053 to Rudd teaches a Shoe fastening device. U.S. Pat. No. 5,177,882 to Berger teaches a Shoe with central fastener. U.S. Pat. No. 5,119,539 to Curry teaches a Lace fastener. U.S. Pat. No. 5,109,581 to Gould teaches a Device and method for securing a shoe. U.S. Pat. No. 4,991,273 to Huttle teaches Shoe lace fastening. U.S. Pat. No. 4,648,159 to Dougherty teaches a Fastener for lace or rope or the like. U.S. Pat. No. 4,616,432 to Bunch et al. teaches a Shoe upper with lateral fastening arrangement. U.S. Pat. No. 4,507,878 to Semouha teaches a Fastener mechanism. U.S. Pat. No. 4,458,373 to Maslow teaches Laced shoe and method for tying shoelaces. U.S. Pat. No. 4,261,081 to Lott teaches a Shoelace tightener. U.S. Pat. No. 4,130,949 to Seidel teaches Fastening means for sports shoes. U.S. Pat. No. 4,125,918 to Baumann teaches a Fastener for lace shoes. U.S. Pat. No. 4,071,964 to Vogiatzis teaches a Footwear fastening system. U.S. Pat. No. 5,097,573 to Gimeno teaches Fastening Device for Lace Up Shoes. U.S. Pat. No. 5,001,847 to Waters teaches a Lace Fastener. U.S. Pat. No. 5,477,593 to Leick teaches a Lace Device. U.S. Pat. No. 6,282,817 to Curet teaches an Apparatus and Method for Lacing.
In US 2011/0094072 to Lin describes a Shoelace with Shoelace Fastener. In US 2010/0115744 to Fong describes a Lace Fastener. In US 2009/0172929 to Huang describes a Device for tying Shoe laces. In US 2008/025068 to Stramare describes a Shoe with Directional Conditioning Device for lace or the like. In US 2007/0169380 to Borsoi teaches a Device for B Flexible Strands. In US 2006/0213085 to Azam teaches an Article for Footware with Linkage Tightening Device. In US 2005/0005477 to Borsoi teaches a Lace B Device. In US 2003/0226284 to Grande teaches a Lacing System For Skates. In US 2002/0002781 to Bourier teaches a Lace Tightening Device Having a Pocket for Storing a B Element.
In conclusion, all the above inventions do not propose a Lace Fastening Device which combines all of the following desired properties which we included in our invention:
The invention includes various lace ratcheting configurations of a basic lace ratcheting device. These configurations facilitate easy fastening and keeping fastened of: laces, ropes, strings and alike. The basic Lace Ratcheting Device (LRD) is small in dimensions and can be installed on shoes or on other objects which need fastening of laces, ropes, strings and alike. The LRD can be used to fasten laces simply by inserting the laces into LRDs and pulling them. The LRD has a self locking ratcheting mechanism what it means is a mechanism that automatically restricts the lace motion backwards when the lace is pulled backwards and the mechanism applies a blocking force in proportion to pulling force. The ratcheting mechanism has two states: “active” and “inactive”. In the active state the device works as a lace ratchet i.e. allowing the lace to be pulled forwards but blocks or severely restricts any lace motion backwards. After the user has fastened the laces they remain fastened until the mechanism is switched into an inactive state. In the inactive state the lace is allowed to move freely forwards and backwards. Each LRD has a channel for fastening one lace. In one embodiment of the LRD, the channel comprises of four walls: a gripping wall, a top wall opposite to the gripping wall, a lower side wall approximately normal to the gripping wall and an upper side wall opposite to the lower side wall. A turning gate (made of solid material) is rotatably installed within the channel on a fulcrum i.e. an axle fitted into a bearing. The axle is centered at the turning gate's axis of rotation. The turning gate comprises of a front end and a rear end wherein the axis of rotation is situated between the two ends. The front end is opposite the gripping wall and there is a gap between the front end and the gripping wall. The lace is passing through the gap. The turning gate's rear end serves as a releasing lever. In one embodiment, a preloaded helical torsion spring is mounted on the axle. In other embodiments one could use other kinds of springs. The spring is installed preloaded with a bias which tends to turn the gate in backwards direction i.e. towards an active state in which the front end applies pressure force on the lace which is squeezed in the gap against the gripping wall. Thus, the idle state of the turning gate is in active state and it is switched into inactive state only when the user applies manual pressure on the lever which exceeds the bias and turns the turning gate forwards, thus releasing the pressure force the front end applies on the lace in the gap. The turning gate has a front end which has a single tapered edge i.e. sharp edge with a smooth side i.e. the front end is tapered i.e. sharp and has a smooth side at its lower side. The lace passes through a gap between the front end of the turning gate and the channel's gripping wall situated opposite to the front end of the turning gate. The gap width is controlled by a ratcheting mechanism operated by the lever.
When the ratcheting mechanism is in the active state, the gap is narrowed such that the front end applies a pressure force which is squeezing the lace in the channel with its tapered i.e. sharp edge. At this state the mechanism and acts as a lace ratchet. It means that the turning gate allows forwards fastening motion of the lace but blocks or severely restricts any lace translation in backwards direction. In order to have a ratcheting operation, the turning gate is installed in a forwards leaning diagonal orientation in the channel such that its front end is closer to the gripping wall then its axis of rotation. Also, in a forwards leaning diagonal orientation, the turning gate's front end is closer to the channel's exit than the turning gate's axis of rotation. The ratchet operation of the gate stems from the forward leaning diagonal orientation of the turning gate, which allows forwards lace motion when the lace is moved forwards. Moving forwards the lace which is squeezed in the gap, drags the turning gate's front end forwards due to the friction force which exists between the lace and the front end because of the pressure force applied by the front end on the lace. When the front end moves forwards also the turning gate turns forwards as well. Due to the forwards leaning diagonal state of the turning gate, when its front end is moved forwards it also moves laterally inwards i.e. away from its gripping wall, thus increasing the width of the gap between the front end and its gripping wall which results in diminished pressure force of the front end on the lace. Reduced pressure force on the lace results in reduced friction between the lace and the surface of the gripping wall and also reduced friction between the lace and the front end and enabling (facilitating) even easier forwards motion of the lace.
On the other hand, if the lace moves backwards it also drags the turning gate's front end backwards since the front end is squeezing the lace and has a mutual friction force with the lace. When the front end moves backwards also the turning gate turns backwards as well. Due to the forwards leaning diagonal orientation of the gate, the motion backwards of the front end has also a lateral outwards component which moves the front end towards the gripping wall thus further narrowing the gap which increases the pressure force of the front end on the lace and further restricting backwards lace motion. Thus, in an active state the gate acts as a lace ratchet i.e. allows lace forwards motion but blocks lace's backwards motion. When the ratcheting mechanism is switched into inactive state, the turning gate is turned forwards by the user and the gap is widened more than the lace's width the pressure force of the front end on the lace is diminished and the lace is entirely released because it can move freely forwards or backwards in the channel. The user can easily switch the ratcheting mechanism from active to inactive state simply by manually pressing on the lever, which is the rear end of the turning gate. If the manual pressure is greater than the torsion spring's preloading bias, the gate turns forwards and increases the gap's width, thus inactivating the LRD. When the manual pressure ceases the preloaded torsion spring turns the gate backwards into an active state. The LRD can be manufactured at low cost because it has a simple structure with only few parts, which could be made from plastics. To protect the tapered front end of the turning gate which controls the lace it was covered with sheet metal jacket in order to sharpen its blade and protect it.
The LRD's structure is different from other lace fastening devices in few important aspects. Primarily, the LRD enables a lace ratcheting operation which is “self locking” it means that in the blocked state pulling the blocked lace with more force, only increases also the blocking force. In addition, our LRD was configured to employ a ratcheting mechanism which causes only minimal wear of the lace since it employs in the channel a novel structure with a diagonally forwards leaning rotating gate with a single tapered i.e. sharp front end which has a smooth side at its lower side opposite the gripping wall. When the lace is moved forwards, the tapered i.e. sharp edge at the front end of the turning gate rotates forwards this also turns the smooth side of the tapered i.e. sharp edge to be approximately parallel with the lace and the lace is sliding on the smooth side of the tapered i.e. sharp edge—which does not wear the lace. At the same time, the forwards rotation also widens the gap and reduces lace friction and wear while the lace is moved forwards. Since the lace is blocked from moving backwards, there is no lace wear in the backwards motion as well. In addition, the LRD's gripping wall is manufactured with a smooth surface to minimize lace wear when it moves in the gap as well. In contrast, other lace fastening devices employ gates with serrated surfaces and/or with sharp teeth structures in order to block lace movement in their blocked state. However, sharp teeth structures cause significant lace wear even when they turn into their unblocked state since their teeth remain pointed at the lace and the lace still touches them as it moves even in a wider gap.
A pair of LRDs in a parallel configuration can be used as a shoe “Ratchet Lace Buckle”, which is not attached to the shoe but enables fastening two ends of each shoe lace. The LRDs are attached to one another in a parallel configuration of their channels by attaching the LRDs at their gripping walls. Such a shoe buckle, which is not attached to the shoe, enables easy fastening and releasing of the shoe laces. The two gate levers of the turning gates protrude from openings in the channels' top walls, on the two opposite sides of LRD's parallel configuration. This enables the user to unlock both LRDs easily by pressing the levers with two fingers of one hand.
Both of the “Ratchet Buckle” structures of the parallel configuration and a triangular configuration of two LRDs is designed to lie flat on top of the shoe when the laces are fastened. Each of the channels at the entry opening has a recess at the lower side wall. Each of the channels at entry opening also has a rear segment of the lower side wall next to and behind the recess. The laces are inserted into the channel via the recesses. When the lace is fastened on the shoe, the lace applies a downwards force on the recess. The downwards force is countered by a natural reaction upwards force which is applied on the rear segment by the shoe. The downwards force and the reaction upwards force create a moment of force which is equivalent to a torque that tends to turn each of the LRDs in the LRDs' parallel configuration towards the shoe. Hence, the moment of force clutches the LRDs' parallel configuration onto the top the shoe.
In another lacing configuration, two single LRDs can be attached to the two sides of each shoe for fastening of two lace ends of the same lace. A single LRD can also be used to fasten laces of trousers or coats simply by tying one lace end to the LRD and using the LRD to fasten the other lace's end. All the LRD configurations described above can be implemented by LRDs with helical torsion springs manufactured from elastic material wires which have two wire ends. The rear support LRD has a channel attached pin which supports one wire end at the rear side of the turning gate while the second wire end is supported by the turning gate. The frontal support LRD has a channel's top wall support which supports one wire end at the front side of the turning gate while the second wire end is supported by the turning gate.
The LRD has many advantages over previous devices primarily due to its efficient and easy fastening operation by a ratchet mechanism which requires the user just to pull the lace. An important advantage of the LRD is its self locking ratcheting mechanism it means that in the active blocking state pulling the blocked lace with more force, only increases also the blocking force. This prevents the lace from slipping. Once the lace is pulled, it remains fastened until the ratcheting mechanism is switched from active state into inactive state whereby it disables the ratchet mechanism and releases the lace. Another advantage of the LRD is the ability to manually switch the ratcheting mechanisms of two LRDs in parallel configuration and also in triangular configuration from active state into inactive state simply by squeezing the two opposite gate levers using just two fingers of one hand. Additional advantage over all the other lace ratchets is the LRD causes very low wear on the laces because it does not block or restrict the lace movement using jagged surfaces. Handling laces with fastening devices which have jagged surfaces or which have sharp teeth, as all other lace fasteners do, results in fast wear of the laces. The diagonal orientation of the turning gate's tapered front end i.e. the sharp edges at the front ends of the turning gates in the LRDs, cause very little lace wear because each tapered i.e. sharp edge has a smooth side on which the lace slides when it is fastened. The LRD was worn and tested daily by the Applicant for more than two years on various shoes without any noticeable lace wear.
Another recent improvement is the sheet metal covering of the turning gate's front end, which sharpens it and protects it against breaking and wearing.
The two joint channels of the RLDs in parallel configuration 1 are depicted in
The two joint channels of the RLDs in parallel configuration 1 are depicted in
The two joint channels of the RLDs in parallel configuration 1 are depicted in
This Application is Continuation In Part of application Ser. No. 15/722,755 Filed on Oct. 2, 2017.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1279043 | Treadgold | Sep 1918 | A |
1489117 | De Paye | Apr 1924 | A |
1520716 | Judd | Dec 1924 | A |
2131454 | Prestinari | Sep 1938 | A |
3225402 | Altman | Dec 1965 | A |
4071964 | Vogiatzis | Feb 1978 | A |
4125918 | Baumann | Nov 1978 | A |
4130949 | Seidel | Dec 1978 | A |
4261081 | Lott | Apr 1981 | A |
4458373 | Maslow | Jul 1984 | A |
4507878 | Semouha | Apr 1985 | A |
4616432 | Bunch | Oct 1986 | A |
4648159 | Dougherty | Mar 1987 | A |
4991273 | Huttle | Feb 1991 | A |
5001847 | Waters | Mar 1991 | A |
5097573 | Gimeno | Mar 1992 | A |
5109581 | Gould | May 1992 | A |
5119539 | Curry | Jun 1992 | A |
5177882 | Berger | Jan 1993 | A |
5203053 | Rudd | Apr 1993 | A |
5230171 | Cardaropoli | Jul 1993 | A |
5293669 | Sampson | Mar 1994 | A |
5293675 | Shai | Mar 1994 | A |
5295315 | Osawa | Mar 1994 | A |
5335401 | Hanson | Aug 1994 | A |
5467511 | Kubo | Nov 1995 | A |
5477593 | Leick | Dec 1995 | A |
5572774 | Duran | Nov 1996 | A |
5572777 | Shelton | Nov 1996 | A |
6049950 | Cavallo | Apr 2000 | A |
6076241 | Borel | Jun 2000 | A |
6094787 | Chang | Aug 2000 | A |
6192241 | Yu | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192559 | Munsell | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6282817 | Curet | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6334240 | Li | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6339867 | Azam | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6438871 | Culverwell | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6588079 | Manzano | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6622358 | Christy | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6729000 | Liu | May 2004 | B1 |
6735829 | Hsu | May 2004 | B2 |
6938308 | Funk | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7082701 | Dalgaard | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7152285 | Liao | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7313849 | Liu | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7320161 | Taylor | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7360282 | Borsoi | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7591050 | Hammerslag | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7681289 | Liu | Mar 2010 | B2 |
8046937 | Beers | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8141273 | Stramare | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8230560 | Luzlbauer | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8231074 | Hu | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8332994 | Lin | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8371004 | Huber | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8381362 | Hammerslag | Feb 2013 | B2 |
9185948 | Ben-Arie | Nov 2015 | B2 |
20020002781 | Bouirer | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20030070269 | Chung | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030226284 | Grande | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040148741 | Hsiao | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040226189 | Semitka | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050005477 | Borsoi | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20060213085 | Azam | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070169380 | Borsoi | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080250618 | Stramare | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090172929 | Hwang | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100115744 | Fong | May 2010 | A1 |
20110067211 | Huber | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110094072 | Lin | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20130160256 | Waldman | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20140208551 | Ben-Arie | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20150216264 | Kim | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20160374432 | Park | Dec 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190380445 A1 | Dec 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15722755 | Oct 2017 | US |
Child | 16550345 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15207517 | Jul 2016 | US |
Child | 15722755 | US |