Laces that thread easily and form a non-slip knot

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6212743
  • Patent Number
    6,212,743
  • Date Filed
    Monday, February 22, 1999
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 10, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Inventors
  • Examiners
    • Sandy; Robert J.
    Agents
    • Salzman & Levy
Abstract
Laces for shoes, sneakers, or other wearing apparel that adjust easily, but stay tied. In one embodiment, the novel design is a flat lace having an upper and lower surface made from different materials. The surfaces have a relatively low coefficient of friction with respect to a shoe's eyelets. Upon being tied, the surfaces have a high coefficient of friction when they are in contact with one another. An alternative design includes a brush-like array of tiny fibers protruding from the lace surface. Another embodiment consists of a middle portion having material properties different from its end portions. An alternative design has two sets of opposing sides with different material properties. The inventive designs minimize the possibility of laces coming untied.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to laces for footwear and, more particularly, to shoe and sneaker laces that can be easily threaded, looped, and adjusted, but that retain a tight knot when tied.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Laces can be tied tightly or loosely, depending upon the preference of the wearer. Even a custom-made shoe benefits from the adjustability provided by laces, since both the dimensions of a foot and the tightness/looseness preference can change in the course of the day. To accommodate a nearly unlimited range of foot shapes and sizes, however, a sufficient amount or a limited amount of slack must be provided.




Shoe laces present a simple engineering concept that does not always perform as planned. A shoe lace should be designed to slide easily through the eyelets or holes provided in the shoe or sneaker. This is necessary so that a proper setting of size and tension is achieved. However, once the lace is tied, it should stay tied. On close observation, it will be noted that these two requirements are diametrically opposed. Many laces, while easy to adjust, fail to stay tied, once knotted. To illustrate this problem, consider a newspaper account of a Marathon runner named John Kagwe: “Just one problem with the Nike Air Vengeance: the laces kept untying. ‘And I had triple knots,’ said Kagwe, of Kenya. Stopping twice to tie his shoes, and running the last four miles with the right lace flapping, Kagwe won the marathon in two hours, eight minutes, and twelve seconds through 26.2 miles in the rain . . . ”




Several inventors have addressed the problem of keeping laces adequately tied. In U.S. Pat. No. 5,272,796, issued to Nichols on Dec. 28, 1993 for SLIP RESISTANT SHOE LACE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME, a slip resistant shoe lace is illustrated. Strands of higher frictional coefficient are woven internally of the outer perimeter of the lace, in order to provide a frictionally enhanced lace that will not slip its knot.




In U.S. Pat. No. 4,780,936, issued to Brecher on Nov. 1, 1988 for STAY-TIED SHOE LACES, a shoe and lace combination is shown that impedes the loosening of a tied lace. The tongue of a shoe is provided with a flexible band member that folds over the lace after it has been knotted. The band secures the knot from unraveling. The flexible band is itself held in its fold-over position by means of a Velcro patch disposed thereupon, that mates with a corresponding patch on a distal end thereof.




In U.S. Pat. No. 5,673,546, issued to Abraham et al. on Oct. 7, 1997 for NON-SLIP SHOELACES, a slip resistant shoe lace is illustrated. The lace features a plurality of special slip resistant yarns that contains slubs. The slubs, when woven into a lace, provide a length of material that has protuberances disposed along the length of the lace. These protuberances are meant to provide frictional “bumps” at periodic intervals, which bumps will prevent a tied lace from unravelling its knot.




None of these lace systems, however, has addressed the concurrent problem of assuring that the laces easily slide through the eyelets or holes provided for them. Indeed, these laces will resist becoming untied once knotted, but they are now more likely to resist being threaded through the eyelets of a shoe or sneaker. Adding frictional means within the yarn solves the problem of unravelling, but exacerbates the problem of threading the lace through the eyelets of the shoe. As aforementioned, the two objectives compete with each other, and require opposite design criteria.




In present day laces, the yarn presents a compromise between the competing objectives. One is forced to choose between non-slippage and ease of threading.




The present invention is a shoe lace that is easily threaded, looped, and adjusted through the eyelets of a shoe, while at the same time is capable of forming a non-slip knot, when tied.




One embodiment of the inventive device is a flat shoe lace comprising an upper and lower surface made of different materials. The novel lace configuration performs a function similar to that of hook-on-one-side, pile-on-the-other-side fasteners. Unlike Velcro®, however, the surfaces are not designed for adhesion, but for high static friction between the upper and lower surfaces of the flat lace. When tying the flat shoe lace, both surfaces inevitably come in contact with each other. In this way, the laces resist inadvertent untying. Both the upper and lower surfaces have a low coefficient of both static and sliding friction with respect to the eyelets or holes. This enables the lace to be threaded through with minimal effort.




Alternative embodiments for obtaining high lace-to-lace friction and negligible lace-to-eyelet friction are described in detail hereinbelow.




While the various embodiments describe flat or rectangular shaped laces, the novel design approach would also be applicable to a lace with a round or oval cross-section.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




In accordance with the present invention, there is provided a shoe lace that is easy to thread through the eyelets of a shoe or sneaker, and also provides a knot that does not slip, when tied. In one embodiment, the shoe lace is flat and comprises an upper and lower surface with different frictional properties. The two surfaces of the lace that are in contact with the eyelet(s) are made of yarns, the yarns being designed to be smooth and substantially friction-free with respect to the eyelets. Thus, the threading of the lace becomes smooth and easy. On the other hand, the surfaces have a higher coefficient of friction with respect to one another. Moreover, any surfaces can be roughened by introducing slubs or “friction bumps” into the weave.




The surfaces of the lace present competing and opposite holding characteristics. During the tying process, such a lace tends to grab about the frictional surfaces, since these surfaces present the greater contacting surface area. Also, as the laces are looped during the tying process, they tend to skew and present the greater frictionalized surface area to the knot vortex.




It is an object of this invention to provide an improved lace for a shoe or sneaker.




It is another object of the invention to provide a shoe lace that is easy to thread through the eyelet of a shoe or sneaker, but the knot of which resists untying or slipping open.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




A complete understanding of the present invention may be obtained by reference to the accompanying drawings, when considered in conjunction with the subsequent detailed description, in which:





FIG. 1

illustrates a partial, enlarged, perspective view of the shoe lace of this invention;





FIG. 2

depicts a partial, enlarged, perspective, in situ view of the shoe lace shown in

FIG. 1

, as it passes through the eyelet of a shoe;





FIG. 3

shows an enlarged, perspective view of the shoe lace shoe in

FIG. 1

, as it is tied into a knot;





FIG. 4

illustrates a partial, enlarged, perspective view of an alternative embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 5

depicts a partial, enlarged, perspective, in situ view of he alternative embodiment of the lace shown in

FIG. 4

, as it passes through the eyelet of a shoe;





FIG. 6

shows an enlarged, perspective view of the alternative embodiment of the lace shown in

FIG. 4

, as it is tied into a knot;





FIG. 7

illustrates a perspective view of another alternative embodiment of this invention;





FIG. 8

illustrates a partial, enlarged, perspective view of another embodiment of the lace in accordance with the present invention;





FIG. 9

depicts a partial, enlarged, perspective, in situ view of the embodiment of the lace shown in

FIG. 8

, as it passes through the eyelet of a shoe; and





FIG. 10

shows an enlarged, perspective view of the embodiment of the lace shown in

FIG. 8

, as it is tied into a knot.











For purposes of brevity and clarity, like elements and components will bear the same number or designation throughout the figures.




DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




Generally speaking, the invention features a flat lace, the opposing sides having a high coefficient of friction between them, while each side has a low coefficient of friction relative to the eyelets or holes through which the laces pass. This disparity in coefficients can be achieved by using a Velcro-like approach, with dissimilar configurations on the two sides of the lace.




Referring now to

FIG. 1

, the shoe lace


10


of this invention is illustrated in partial, enlarged, perspective view. The shoe lace


10


comprises a cylindrical, threading end cap


12


and a length of yarn


14


(shown herein cut short for viewing purposes). The length of yarn


14


is flat, as illustrated at the cut end


13


. The yarn


14


, itself, comprises an upper surface


16


and a lower surface


18


made of different materials bonded together either by mechanical fastening (e.g., sewing) or by an intumescent layer of adhesive, not shown. Alternatively, different materials may be affixed or sprayed to the upper and lower surfaces


16


and


18


, respectively. The surfaces


16


and


18


can be made with coarse or corded fibers to increase friction. Slubs or “friction bumps” may also be introduced into the weave of the respective surfaces


16


and


18


to increase the friction thereof.




The purpose of making surfaces


16


and


18


from different materials is to provide an interface


20


(

FIG. 3

) having a relatively high coefficient of friction. Thus, surfaces


16


and


18


will provide non-slippage during the knotting of the yarn


14


. However, the surfaces


16


and


18


both have a relatively low coefficient of friction when in contact with the inner eyelet surface


22


of a shoe, thereby allowing the lace


10


to be threaded easily, as further explained hereinbelow.




Referring now to

FIG. 2

, a portion of the yarn


14


of shoe lace


10


is shown passing (arrow


26


) through one eyelet


24


of a plurality of typical eyelets for a shoe or sneaker (not shown). The yarn


14


easily passes through the eyelet


24


due to the reduced friction existing between the contacting surfaces


16


or


18


and eyelet surface


22


.




Referring to

FIG. 3

, the yarn


14


is shown being tied into a knot matrix


28


, in keeping with tying of the lace


10


about the front of a shoe or sneaker. For purposes of forming the knot matrix


28


, the upper and lower surfaces


16


and


18


, respectively, come into substantial contact with each other at points “A”, “B”, and “C”, as the knot matrix


28


is formed. Thus, the overall effect of the bifurcated frictional lace structure is to provide a knot matrix


28


that does not slip.




Referring now to

FIG. 4

, the shoe lace


30


of an alternative embodiment is illustrated in partial, enlarged, perspective view. The material used to make the lace


30


(i.e., yarn


34


) is the same throughout the entire lace


30


. A rectangular lace is used in this embodiment. However, flat, rounded, elliptical, or other shaped laces can incorporate the design elements described hereinbelow.




The lace


30


comprises a brush-like array


36


of tiny fibers


38


protruding from the lace surface


42


. These fibers


38


, having a relatively low coefficient of friction (i.e., a coefficient between that of Teflon and nylon), slide easily through the eyelet


24


. At the same time, the lace


30


is resistant to sliding against itself; hence, knots in lace


30


remain tied.




The shoe lace


30


comprises a cylindrical, threading end cap


32


and a length of yarn


34


(shown herein cut short for viewing purposes). Again, slubs or “friction bumps” may be introduced into the weave to further increase the friction thereof.




The purpose of constructing the lace


30


with a brush-like array


36


of tiny fibers


38


is to provide increased surface area for contact. Fibers


38


come in contact with one another and with the lace surface


42


. Increasing the surface area increases the friction, thereby causing the lace


30


to remain tied. Furthermore, the fibers


38


can be made of a material with a relatively high coefficient of friction.




Referring to

FIG. 5

, a portion of the yarn


34


of shoe lace


30


is shown passing (arrow


46


) through one eyelet


24


of a plurality of typical eyelets for a shoe or sneaker (not shown). The fibers


38


have a low coefficient of friction with respect to the inner eyelet surface


22


. It will be observed that the fibers


38


and, to a lesser extent, yarn


34


come into contact with the inner eyelet surface


22


. The lace


30


can easily pass through the eyelet


24


.




Referring to

FIG. 6

, the yarn


34


is shown being tied into a knot matrix


48


, in keeping with tying of the lace


30


about the front of a shoe or sneaker. For purposes of forming the knot matrix


48


, the fibers


38


come into substantial contact with each other. Also, lace surfaces


42


come in contact at points “D”, “E”, and “F”, as the knot matrix


48


is formed.




Referring now to

FIG. 7

, shown is the shoe lace


50


of another embodiment of the invention in a perspective view. Lace


50


has a middle portion


52


having material properties different from end portions


54


. Middle portion


52


is the part that, after the shoe is laced, is near or inside eyelet


24


(

FIG. 5

) and is made of material with a relatively low coefficient of friction.




End portions


54


, having a relatively high coefficient of friction, are involved in the knotting or tying. The difference in friction between middle and end portions


52


and


54


, respectively, is accomplished by using either different types of fibers (e.g., substantially frictionless material such as polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) for the middle of the laces, nylon for the end portions), different weaves, or both.




Now referring to

FIG. 8

, the shoe lace


60


of another embodiment of the invention is illustrated in partial, enlarged, perspective view. The shoe lace


60


comprises a cylindrical, threading end cap


62


and a length of yarn


64


(shown herein cut short for viewing purposes). The length of yarn


64


has a rectangular cross-section


66


, as illustrated at the cut end. The broader or wider paired sides


68


and


70


, respectively, of the lace


60


are made with coarse or corded fibers to increase its friction. Slub or “friction bumps” may also be introduced into the weave of the respective sides


68


and


70


to increase the friction thereof.




The smaller, adjacently paired sides


72


and


74


are made smooth and relatively friction-free. This can be accomplished by using substantially frictionless material such as polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) threads or by coating these surfaces with substantially frictionless material such as polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE).




The purpose of making adjacently paired surfaces (


68


,


70


) and (


72


,


74


), respectively, of the rectangular shaped yarn


64


is to provide different coefficients of friction to these surfaces. Thus, when threading the lace


60


, the smooth surfaces


72


and


74


contact the eyelets of a shoe, allowing the lace


60


to be threaded easily. Alternately, the roughened sides


68


and


70


provide non-slippage during knotting of the yarn


64


.




Referring to

FIG. 9

, a portion of the yarn


64


of shoe lace


60


is shown passing (arrow


78


) through one eyelet


76


of a plurality of typical eyelets for a shoe or sneaker (not shown). Only the smooth, teflonized sides


72


and


74


, respectively, come into contact with the inner eyelet surface


80


. The yarn


64


easily passes through the eyelet


76


due to the reduced friction existing between the contacting surfaces


72


and


80


, and surfaces


74


and


80


, respectively. During the threading of lace


60


through the eyelet


76


, the broader or wider sides


68


and


70


, respectively, rarely touch the inner surface


80


of eyelet


76


.




Referring to

FIG. 10

, the yarn


64


is shown being tied into a knot matrix


82


, in keeping with tying of the lace


60


about the front of a shoe or sneaker. For purposes of forming the knot matrix


82


, the upper and lower, wider frictional sides


68


and


70


, respectively, come into substantial contact with each other at points “G”, “H”, and “I”, as the knot matrix


82


is formed. The smoother, smaller sides


72


and


74


have minimal contact with each other and with the adjacent sides


68


and


70


, barely influencing the formation of the knot matrix


82


. Thus, the overall effect of the bifurcated frictional lace structure is to provide a knot matrix


82


that does not slip.




Although the lace of this invention has been described for footwear, it is conceivable that such a lace may also be usefully employed with other wearing apparel such as ski jackets, hoods, etc. Moreover, the lace can be flat, rectangular, polygonal, cylindrical, spherical, or asymmetrical, as befits its application(s).




Since other modifications and changes varied to fit particular operating requirements and environments will be apparent to those skilled in the art, the invention is not considered limited to the example chosen for purposes of disclosure, and covers all changes and modifications which do not constitute departures from the true spirit and scope of this invention.




Having thus described the invention, what is desired to be protected by Letters Patent is presented in the subsequently appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. A lace for footwear or apparel having eyelets, said lace comprising a length of lacing material for lacing said footwear or apparel and being movable for contact through said eyelets of said footwear or apparel, said length of material comprising upper and lower major surfaces, and side surfaces, comprising a first material, that are juxtaposed with respect to said upper and lower major surfaces, and which are smaller in area than said upper and lower major surfaces in order to reduce frictional force against said eyelets, each one of said upper and lower major surfaces comprising a with material having a uniformly higher coefficient of friction than said first material, so when said upper and lower major surfaces are formed into a knot, said upper and lower major surfaces will not slip out of the knot, while said side surfaces are substantially free to slide through said eyelets.
  • 2. The lace for footwear or apparel in accordance with claim 1, wherein at least one of said major surfaces comprises slubs.
  • 3. The lace for footwear or apparel or apparel in accordance with claim 1, wherein at least one of said major surfaces comprises coarse fiber.
  • 4. The lace for footwear or apparel in accordance with claim 1, wherein at least one of said major surfaces comprises corded fiber.
  • 5. A lace for footwear or apparel, said lace comprising a length of lacing material for lacing said footwear or apparel, said length of material having a substantially rectangular cross-section and first and second pairs of diametrically opposite sides, said first pair of diametrically opposite sides comprising a first material having a first coefficient of friction and being substantially smoothly movable for contact with eyelet surfaces, thus passing easily through said eyelets, said second pair of diametrically opposite sides comprising a second material having a second coefficient of friction and being uniformly rougher than said first pair of sides, as defined by a higher coefficient of friction, whereby said lace can form a non-slip knot.
  • 6. The lace for footwear or apparel in accordance with claim 5, wherein said first material comprises a substantially frictionless-like material.
  • 7. The lace for footwear or apparel in accordance with claims 5, wherein said second pair of sides comprises corded fiber.
  • 8. The lace for footwear or apparel in accordance with claim 5, wherein said second pair of sides comprises slubs.
  • 9. The lace for footwear or apparel in accordance with claim 5, wherein said second pair of sides comprises coarse fiber.
US Referenced Citations (13)
Number Name Date Kind
818991 Abramson Apr 1906
931949 Morrow Aug 1909
1476348 Miller Dec 1923
2477151 Stapleton Jul 1949
2639481 Lester May 1953
3110945 Howe, Jr. Nov 1963
3947928 Maldonado Apr 1976
4247967 Swinton Feb 1981
5074013 Arnold et al. Dec 1991
5673546 Abraham et al. Oct 1997
5778499 Lehrman Jul 1998
5934599 Hammerslag Aug 1999
5946779 Chen Sep 1999