Embodiments described herein generally relate to improved lacing devices and systems and method for using them.
Laces are the most common device used in the closure of various types of footwear and may be used in a variety of other contexts for closing apertures in clothing or other items including a fabric-like or leather-like component. Existing laces have a variety of disadvantages, including that they must be tied and untied in order to remove and put on the shoe.
In one embodiment, a lacing device includes a lace body, the lace body having a length, width, depth, and cross-sectional area spanning the width and the depth of the lace body, the cross-sectional area of the lace body shaped such that the lace body is prone to folding about a middle area of the width when the lace body is compressed. Optionally, the cross-sectional area of the lace body has a narrow profile in the depth in the middle area as compared to edge areas outside the middle area of the width. Alternatively, the cross-sectional area has a dogbone shape. In one alternative, the lace body includes a plurality of ridges. In another alternative, the plurality of ridges runs parallel to the length of the lace body. Optionally, the lace body is composed of thermal plastic urethane (TPU). Alternatively, the lace body has a durometer of 65-75 shore A. Optionally, the lace body includes a slip additive.
In another embodiment, a lacing device includes a lace body, the lace body having a length, width, depth, and cross-sectional area spanning the width and the depth of the lace body, the cross-sectional area of the lace body shaped such that the lace body is prone to folding about a middle area of the width when the lace body is compressed, the lace body having a first configuration where the lace body is not under compressive force, and a second configuration where the lace body is under compressive force, the first configuration characterized by the lace body having a flat profile, the second configuration characterized by the lace body being folded about the middle area of the width. Optionally, the compressive force is a result of tying the lace body around itself. In one alternative, the cross-sectional area of the lace body has a narrow profile in the depth in the middle area as compared to edge areas outside the middle area of the width. Alternatively, the lace body includes a plurality of ridges, and the plurality of ridges run parallel to the length of the lace body. Optionally, in the second configuration, when the lace body is tied around itself, the plurality of ridges compresses and mechanically interacts with each other due to the compressive force. In one configuration, the lace body is composed of thermal plastic urethane (TPU), the lace body has a durometer of 65-75 shore A, and the lace body includes a slip additive.
In one embodiment, a method of using a lacing device includes providing the lacing device, the lacing device having a lace body, the lace body having a length, width, depth, and cross-sectional area spanning the width and the depth of the lace body, the cross-sectional area of the lace body shaped such that the lace body is prone to folding about a middle area of the width when the lace body is compressed. The method further includes lacing a shoe with the lacing device and tying the lacing device wherein the tying causes the lace body to fold about the middle area of the width. Optionally, the method further includes stretching the lacing device to remove the shoe without untying the lacing device. In one alternative, the cross-sectional area of the lace body has a narrow profile in the depth in the middle area as compared to edge areas outside the middle area of the width. Alternatively, the lace body includes a plurality of ridges, and the plurality of ridges run parallel to the length of the lace body. Optionally, in the second configuration, when the lace body is tied around itself, the plurality of ridges compresses and mechanically interacts with each other due to the compressive force. In one configuration, the lace body is composed of thermal plastic urethane (TPU), the lace body has a durometer of 65-75 shore A, and the lace body includes a slip additive.
In an alternative embodiment, a lacing device includes a lace body, wherein the lace body includes a plurality of ridges, the plurality of ridges run parallel to the length of the lace body. Optionally, the lace body is composed of thermal plastic urethane (TPU). Alternatively, the lace body has a length, width, depth, and cross-sectional area spanning the width and the depth of the lace body, the cross-sectional area of the lace body shaped such that the lace body is prone to folding about a middle area of the width when the lace body is compressed. Optionally, the cross-sectional area of the lace body has a narrow profile in the depth in the middle area as compared to edge areas outside the middle area of the width. Alternatively, the cross-sectional area has a dogbone shape. In one alternative, the lace body has a durometer of 65-75 shore A. In another alternative, the lace body includes a slip additive.
Described herein are embodiments of various improved lacing devices. In many embodiments, the improved lacing device is designed so that it will not easily wear out. In many embodiments, the improved lacing device is designed so that when laced in a shoe, the shoe may be slipped on and off without untying the shoe. In many embodiments, the improved lacing device is composed of thermal plastic urethane (TPU).
Unlike other “elastomers”, TPU has very high tear, tensile, and elongation properties at lower durometers (hardness). These properties are very important in order for the lace to survive the abuse in the shoe. Laces tend to wear out in the eyelets—very sharp edge against high tension.
The dogbone shape is an example of one advantageous shape for improved lacing device 100. The shape provides for increased toughness and durability due to the thicker portions 235 as compared to a uniform lace having a skinnier cross section, like that of narrower portion 240. The shape also makes the lace fold at center when going through an eyelet of a shoe or other object. This allows improved lacing device 100 to pass through the eyelet easily due to the deformation. A simple rectangle would not deform/fold as consistently, which would make the lace hard to pull through. Second, this shape makes the lace fold on itself in the knot when tied, which allows the shape to be compressed and the knot to stay tied. A circle or football shape will not deform/fold in the knot matrix. Rather, those shapes would need to be compressed. A solid polymer lace can only deflect its volume as it is compressed. In this case, the circle or football shape lace in a knot would often untie itself as the material wants to spring back. This is because more elastic force is stored and released by the compressed circular shape and, by folding the lace in the middle, a lever arm is created to resist the unfolding. The lever arm runs from the midpoint of the improved lacing device 100 where it folds to the edge of the lace where thicker portion 235 is. Therefore, force keeping the lace folded is multiplied compared to the force provided by the elastic nature of the improved lacing device 100.
Although the dogbone shape is preferred for the improved lacing device 100, other lace shapes can accomplish similar functions. For example, any design that provides for a break point in the middle of the lace may be substituted for the dogbone shape. A break (or bend point) does not mean that the lace physically separates at the break point. Instead, it is the point where the lace will naturally bend when pressure is applied to it. A break point may be arranged by having a thinner portion in the middle of the lace as compared to the ends. Therefore, in alternative embodiments, the thicker portions 235 may be any shape and configuration that makes sense for a lace as long as the middle of the lace includes a narrower portion 240 where natural bending/folding may occur.
Ribs 210 offer numerous advantages. Ribs 210 reduce the surface contact area on the lace. This makes it easier to pull the lace through the eyelets because of the smaller contact surface area. This is important because the material has a high coefficient of friction and having less surface contact, thereby naturally reducing friction. Second, ribs 210 make it easier to pull the knot tight. This is because the ribs break up and reduce the surface contact between the laces when being tied, allowing the user to pull the lace into a knot. When the lace knot assembly is pulled tight, the ribs actually cross directions against the opposing lace in the knot assembly. Under the compression of the knot, the ribs actually create a mechanical interference, which helps keep the knot tied. If the lace was a smooth surface, it would be much easier for the knot to untie itself, especially when wet.
Ribs 210 create a water space for water to drain away from the knot and help keep the knot tied. Urethane and many other materials get slippery when in contact with water. If the lace was a flat surface, the water would sandwich between the flat surfaces of the laces and come untied. The ribs prevent this from happening.
In other embodiments, the improved lacing device 100 has a smooth surface or includes an alternative pattern. Other patterns may have disadvantages as compared to the ribs. Bumps, or squares, or other broken patterns make it difficult to pull the lace through the eyelet and also make it harder to pull the knot tight. This is because the bumps or broken patterns may cause mechanical interference. Alternative beneficial patterns may include wave-like patterns or z-like patterns, especially those that are continuous; however, these patterns may not provide for the ready creation of a break or folding point as described above.
The material used and the durometer of the material may be used to configure a beneficially operating lace. TPU has many advantages over alternative materials. TPU is an elastomer that will work for this application because of its high abrasion resistance, elasticity, and tensile strength. A durometer of 70 A (+/−) 5 durometer for the TPU provides enhanced function for many of the shapes disclosed herein. A durometer of greater than 75 A may be too hard. This is because the lace may not stretch sufficiently to stay tied. Durometers lower than 65 may be too soft with the shapes disclosed herein. This is because the lace does not provide sufficient tension at the lower durometer to function correctly as a shoe lace. Essentially, if the material is too stretchy, it doesn't provide enough support, is too hard to pull tight in the knot assembly, and stretches too much. The proposed durometers hold true for laces that are of standard lace widths. For laces having greater thickness, a lower durometer may be used; however, these laces may not fit in standard shoes and eyelets.
In some embodiments, the lace includes a slip additive. By itself, TPU may be a bit too sticky for use as a lace. This stickiness makes it hard to pull a knot together. A thermoplastic slip agent may be added to the TPU during the extrusion process to reduce this stickiness. This slip agent may reduce the friction of the surface of the TPU lace just enough to allow the lace to slip past itself when tied into a knot. The TPU may still remain grippy/sticky enough for the dog bone shape to still work under compression. In many embodiments, the dogbone shape in its compressed assembly is what keeps the lace knot together. However, there still needs to be a high enough coefficient of friction in the knot assembly so that it doesn't untie. It is believed that, when the lace surface compresses against itself tightly, the slip agent doesn't function in the same way when the lace is uncompressed. It is like the grippyness of the TPU comes back when compressed against itself. The slip agent also makes it easier for the user to pull the lace through the eyelets during installation.
In usage, the user may install the improved lacing device in a shoe and tie it. The user then may utilize the flexibility of the improved lacing device to remove the shoe without untying it. The improved lacing device holds well with elasticity due to the materials used, so the materials will not fatigue very much over time.
The previous detailed description is of a small number of embodiments for an improved lacing device and making and using the same and is not intended to be limiting in scope. The following claims set forth a number of the embodiments for an improved lacing device and making and using the same disclosed with greater particularity.
This application is a continuation of PCT application Ser. No. PCT/US2015/063454 filed on Dec. 2, 2015, which PCT application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/087,682 filed Dec. 4, 2014. The above PCT and provisional patent applications are hereby incorporated by reference to the same extent as though fully contained herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
780377 | Nicholls | Jan 1905 | A |
920646 | Prentice | May 1909 | A |
1061780 | Rogers | May 1913 | A |
1775013 | Yugawa | Sep 1930 | A |
2004702 | Luttmann, Jr. | Jun 1935 | A |
4930196 | Laurin | Jun 1990 | A |
5023982 | Mehan | Jun 1991 | A |
5111558 | Ridley et al. | May 1992 | A |
5778499 | Lehrman | Jul 1998 | A |
6212743 | Cohen | Apr 2001 | B1 |
D768376 | Martinson | Oct 2016 | S |
20030177662 | Elkington et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030186024 | Walsh | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040216799 | Tseng | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050217089 | Lin | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20090297793 | Yun | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20120151795 | Ivester | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20140041167 | Simmons | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140223769 | Dekovic | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150237951 | Hilderbrand, IV | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20180009584 | Martinson | Jan 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
596562 | Jan 1948 | GB |
2411570 | Sep 2005 | GB |
Entry |
---|
Search Report issued in related PCT application No. PCT/US2015/063454 dated Feb. 15, 2016 (2 pages). |
Written Opinion issued in related PCT application No. PCT/US2015/063454 dated Feb. 15, 2016 (10 pages). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in related PCT application No. PCT/US2015/063454 dated Jun. 6, 2017 (11 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170265570 A1 | Sep 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62087682 | Dec 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/US2015/063454 | Dec 2015 | US |
Child | 15612931 | US |