Ladder Circuitry for Multiple Load Regulation

Abstract

An electronic apparatus comprises several series-connected loads powered by a high voltage power source. To provide voltage regulation for each load, a ladder circuit is described. To automatically balance the voltage at output, one or more voltage-control-oscillators are included.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Power consumption of digital integrated circuits is proportional to the square of applied voltage. The electronics industry has continually been driving power supply voltage levels ever lower as a means to reduce power consumption. At the same time, power density levels of integrated circuits have been increasing. As a result, the demand for low voltage/high current capacity power supplies has been ever growing.

Meanwhile, power distribution favors high voltage as a means to reduce copper losses and also the amount of copper required. As a result of the disconnection between power distribution and integrated circuit load requirements, a great burden is placed upon the power converter electronics to provide conversion of power from high voltage distribution grid down to the low voltage electronic load.

Traditional means of interfacing the low-voltage electronic loads to the distribution grid is through the use of one or several AC/DC and DC/DC power converters. IT equipment generally takes an AC input, rectifies the AC input to DC and provides voltage conversion to an intermediate bus voltage supply, between 12-56V for distribution within the IT equipment. One or more DC/DC converters step down the intermediate bus voltage to the low voltage supply required by the electronic loads.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The system and circuitry described herein utilizes a ladder of shunt circuitry to regulate output voltage provided to loads. The cost and efficiency of converting a unit of power from the grid to the load is generally a function of the conversion ratio (V_grid/V_load) and the number of converter stages. Thus, the cost of the power converters, and subsequently converter losses, may be reduced by providing a means of (a) eliminating power converter stages and/or (b) increasing the power converter output voltage requirements. Advantages of the technology described herein include reducing a burden on power converter circuits, regulating output voltage with smaller power consumption, and allowing realization of potential cost and efficiency savings.

In one embodiment, disclosed herein is a voltage regulator circuit for regulating output voltages across a plurality of loads at a plurality of output nodes. The output nodes include at least a first node, a second node, and a third node. A first load is coupled between a first output voltage at the first node and a second output voltage at the second node. A second load is coupled between the second output voltage at the second node and the third node. The voltage regulator circuit includes a first stage and a second stage coupled in series. The first stage includes a pass element coupled between the first node and the second node and in parallel to the first load. The pass element passes a current from the first node to the second node.

The second stage includes an error amplifier coupled to a reference voltage at a first input terminal and the second output voltage at a second input terminal. The error amplifier is configured to generate a control signal at an output terminal based on a comparison between the second output voltage and the reference voltage. The control signal is at a first polarity responsive to the second output voltage being greater than the reference voltage and at a second polarity responsive to the second output voltage being less than the reference voltage. The second stage also includes an adjustable element configured to adjust the current from the first node to the second node responsive to the control signal. The adjustable element increases the current responsive to the control signal at the first polarity and decreases the current responsive to the control signal at the second polarity to regulate the second output voltage at the second node.

In another embodiment, disclosed herein is a voltage regulator circuit for regulating output voltages across a plurality of loads at a plurality of output nodes. The output nodes include at least a first node, a second node, and a third node. A first load is coupled between a first output voltage at the first node and a second output voltage at the second node. A second load is coupled between the second output voltage at the second node and the third node. The voltage regulator circuit includes a first stage and a second stage coupled in series. The first stage includes a first voltage controlled oscillator coupled to a first reference voltage. The first voltage controlled oscillator is configured to output a first clock signal to the first load.

The second stage includes an error amplifier coupled to a second reference voltage at a first input terminal and the second output voltage at a second input terminal. The error amplifier is configured to generate a control signal at an output terminal based on a comparison between the second output voltage and the second reference voltage. The control signal is at a first polarity responsive to the second output voltage being greater than the reference voltage and at a second polarity responsive to the second output voltage being less than the reference voltage. The second stage also includes a second voltage controlled oscillator configured to adjust a second clock signal output to the second load. The second voltage controlled oscillator decreases a frequency of the second clock signal responsive to the control signal at the first polarity and increases the frequency of the second clock signal responsive to the control signal at the second polarity to regulate the second output voltage at the second node.

Additional aspects and advantages of the present disclosure will become readily apparent to those skilled in this art from the following detailed description, wherein only illustrative embodiments of the present disclosure are shown and described. As will be realized, the present disclosure is capable of other and different embodiments, and its several details are capable of modifications in various obvious respects, all without departing from the disclosure. Accordingly, the drawings and description are to be regarded as illustrative in nature, and not as restrictive.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The novel features of the invention are set forth with particularity in the appended claims. A better understanding of the features and advantages of the present invention will be obtained by reference to the following detailed description that sets forth illustrative embodiments, in which the principles of the invention are utilized, and the accompanying drawings (also “FIG.” and “FIGs.” herein), of which:

FIG. 1 depicts a plot of a maximum load voltage deviation versus a normalized load variation.

FIG. 2 depicts a plot of a maximum load voltage deviation versus a number of ladder stages.

FIG. 3 depicts a circuit diagram of a linear shunt regulator.

FIG. 4 depicts a circuit diagram of a 2-stage linear stacked-shunt ladder.

FIG. 5 depicts a plot of an efficiency versus a normalized load variation for a 2-stage linear stacked-shunt ladder.

FIG. 6 depicts a circuit diagram of an N-stage stacked-shunt ladder.

FIG. 7 depicts a plot of an efficiency versus a number of stages for an N-stage stacked-shunt ladder topology with a normalized load variation of 10%.

FIG. 8 depicts a circuit diagram of an N-stage stacked-shunt ladder with a p-type metal-oxide-semiconductor (PMOS) shunt.

FIG. 9 depicts a circuit diagram of a small signal circuit model for a stacked-shunt ladder topology.

FIG. 10 depicts an example a simplified small signal model.

FIG. 11 depicts a circuit diagram of a 2-stage ladder with auto-balance control.

FIG. 12 depicts a circuit diagram of an N-stage ladder with auto-balance control.

FIG. 13 depicts a plot of a maximum load voltage deviation vs. a normalized load variance for an unregulated ladder.

FIG. 14 depicts a plot of a maximum load voltage deviation vs. a number of stages for an unregulated ladder.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

While various embodiments of the invention have been shown and described herein, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that such embodiments are provided by way of example only. Numerous variations, changes, and substitutions may occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the invention. It should be understood that various alternatives to the embodiments of the invention described herein may be employed. It shall be understood that different aspects of the invention can be appreciated individually, collectively, or in combination with each other.

In systems with a plurality of low-voltage loads of nominal current I and variance i, powering the loads from a high voltage source as a series-connected voltage ladder is possible. Such a topology may be used to reduce the cost of DC/DC converters or eliminate a converter stage entirely. In the case of digital integrated circuits, variance in the loading can exist between devices due to process, voltage and temperature differences. Further, integrated circuits may specify an operating voltage tolerance typically in the range of 3-5%. If left unregulated, an error may exist in the applied voltage to each device which can lead to (a) device malfunction and/or (b) damage to the device. Thus, a compensation mechanism is desirable to ensure stable and regulated voltage is provided to each load.

The topology described herein includes N loads of nominal current I and variance i stacked in a ladder circuit. A linear shunt regulator topology is extended to a ladder topology to compensate for loading mismatch, resulting in a regulated voltage at each stage in the ladder. The new topology is a stacked-shunt ladder regulator.

Stacked-Shunt Ladder Regulator

A stacked-shunt ladder regulator reduces a burden on power converter circuits, allowing realization of potential cost and efficiency savings. Furthermore, the regulator can be used in place of several DC/DC converters.

If unregulated, a ladder circuit of N loads, each with nominal load current I and variance i, may have a maximum voltage deviation of:

$\frac{\Delta V}{V}\left[\%\right]=\frac{2\left(1-1\text{/}N\right)i\text{/}I}{1+\left(1-2\text{/}N\right)i\text{/}I}*100\%$

FIG. 1 includes plots of maximum voltage deviation

$\frac{\Delta V}{V}$

versus load variance i/I for afferent number of loads N. FIG. 1 includes a plot for each of the following number N of loads: 2, 3, and 20. As can be seen in FIG. 1, the higher the N, the more voltage deviation incurs. FIG. 2 plots the voltage deviation

$\frac{\Delta V}{V}$

versus the number N of loads for different load variances i/I. It is apparent from FIG. 2 that when the load variance i/I increases, the voltage deviation

$\frac{\Delta V}{V}$

becomes higher. In other words, the load variance may induce voltage variation, which may be an undesirable condition. Therefore, systems, apparatus, and methods described herein provide improved voltage regulation, which reduces voltage variation.

To remove this voltage deviation, a stacked-shunt ladder regulator circuit is used to compensate for the variance i which exists between loads. The stacked-shunt ladder regulator circuit can be understood by first considering a linear shunt regulator principle, then extending it to an N-stage ladder circuit.

A shunt regulator depicted in FIG. 3 ensures a constant current through a pass device R_pass. Referring to FIG. 3, the shunt regulator includes the pass device R_pass, an input voltage V_in with voltage level V₁, a reference voltage V_ref with voltage level V₂, an error amplifier U₁, an n-type metal-oxide-semiconductor (NMOS) M₁, a node N₁ and a node N₂. The input voltage V_tin is connected to node N₁. One end of the pass device R_pass is connected to node N₁ and another end of the pass device R_pass is connected to node N₂, which has an output voltage V_out. Hence, the pass device R_pass is inserted between input voltage V_tin and output voltage V_out. The reference voltage V_ref is connected to a negative input terminal of the error amplifier U₁. An output of the amplifier U₁ is connected to the gate of the NMOS M₁. A positive input terminal of the amplifier U₁ and the drain of the NMOS M₁ and are connected to node N₂, which creates a feedback loop. The source of the NMOS M₁ is connected to ground. An output load I_load is connected to node N₂ and ground (parallel to NMOS M₁) to receive the output voltage V_out which is regulated. The regulated output voltage V_out is equal to:

V _out =V _in −I _in R _pass

I _in =I _out +I _shunt

In some embodiments, as I_out changes from light load to heavy load, I_shunt reacts in an equal and opposite manner to keep I_in constant, and as a result V_out is regulated to a constant voltage. By sinking more or less current through the shunt, the dropout voltage I_inR_pass may be adjusted as necessary to fix V_out to the desired voltage. More specifically, to regulate the output voltage V_out, the error amplifier U₁ compares the output voltage V_out at node N₂ to the reference voltage V_ref and generates a control signal ctrl. If the output voltage V_out at node N₂ is greater than the reference voltage V_ref, the control signal ctrl will have a positive polarity. The greater the magnitude of the control signal ctrl with the positive polarity, the more I_shunt increases which causes I_in to increase and the output voltage V_out at node N₂ to decrease. However, if the output voltage V_out is less than the reference voltage V_ref, the control signal ctrl will have a negative polarity. The greater the magnitude of the control signal ctrl with the negative polarity, the more I_shunt decreases which causes I_in to decrease and the output voltage V_out at node N₂ to increase.

The efficiency of the shunt regulator is as follows:

$\eta =\frac{V_{\mathrm{out}}I_{\mathrm{out}}}{V_{\mathrm{in}}I_{\mathrm{in}}}=\frac{V_{\mathrm{out}}}{V_{\mathrm{in}}}\left\{\frac{1}{1+I_{\mathrm{shunt}}\text{/}I_{\mathrm{out}}}\right\}$

Based on the above, the shunt regulator can hold the following properties/characteristics:

• • 1. The pass device R_pass may be sized for the heavy load condition to ensure load regulation:

$R_{\mathrm{pass}}\le \frac{V_{\mathrm{in}}-V_{\mathrm{out}}}{I_{\mathrm{out},\max }}$

• • I_out,max is the maximum current of the output load I_load.
  • 2. A constant-power topology may be utilized. As the load current I_out reduces from maximum to minimum, the shunt elements (NMOS M₁ and error amplifier U₁) may increase current I_shunt from minimum to maximum. As a result, efficiency greatly suffers at light load.
  • 3. Maximum power dissipation in the shunt elements may be equal to the maximum output power.

A stacked-shunt ladder regulator extends the principle of the shunt regulator into a ladder circuit topology. The topology finds cost-effective use in systems with several low-voltage loads for tight voltage regulation, and which may not be referenced to the system ground. Loads with small variance in power dissipation may be ideal to minimize losses in the shunt elements.

A stacked-shunt ladder regulator with two stages according to one embodiment is described in FIG. 4. The stacked-shunt ladder regulator includes the same circuitry as the shunt regulator of FIG. 3, except to create the two stage ladder, an additional load I_load1 is connected between node N₁ and node N₂. The load I_load1 is in parallel with the pass element R_pass. The first stage of the stacked-shunt ladder regulator (also referred to as the unregulated stage) includes the pass element R_pass in parallel with the load I_load1, which receives output voltage V_out1 at node N₁. The second stage includes the error amplifier U₁ and the NMOS M₁ similar to the circuit of FIG. 3, which are connected in parallel with load I_load2 (referred to as I_load in FIG. 3). The load I_load2 receives output voltage V_out2 at node N₂. The first stage and the second stage are connected in series. Further, the loads I_load1 and I_load2 are considered to consume nominal current I, with variance i.

Each load is regulated to equal voltage, thus V_in=2V_out, where V_out is the voltage across each of the loads I_load1 and I_load2. In an N-stage ladder where there are N loads, V_in=NV_out. Now, the pass and shunt elements compensate for load variance i, instead of the min-to-max load variation as in the traditional shunt regulator topology.

The pass element R_pass may be sized to accommodate for the maximum load spread between I_load1 and I_load2, in contrast with the traditional shunt regulator where the pass element R_pass may be sized to source the maximum load current.

$R_{\mathrm{pass}}\le \frac{V_{\mathrm{in}}-V_{\mathrm{out}}}{I_{\mathrm{load}2,\max }-I_{\mathrm{load}1,\min }}\le \frac{2V_{\mathrm{out}}-V_{\mathrm{out}}}{I+i-\left(I-i\right)}$ $R_{\mathrm{pass}}\le \frac{V_{\mathrm{out}}}{2i}$

The efficiency is:

$\eta =\frac{P_{\mathrm{out}}}{P_{\mathrm{out}}+P_{\mathrm{loss}}}=\frac{V_{\mathrm{out}}\left(I_{\mathrm{load}1}+I_{\mathrm{load}2}\right)}{V_{\mathrm{out}}\left(I_{\mathrm{load}1}+I_{\mathrm{load}2}+I_{\mathrm{pass}}+I_{\mathrm{shunt}}\right)}$ $\eta =\frac{I_{\mathrm{load}1}+I_{\mathrm{load}2}}{I_{\mathrm{load}1}+I_{\mathrm{load}2}+I_{\mathrm{pass}}+I_{\mathrm{shunt}}}$

P_out is the total output power, P_loss is the power loss by the pass element R_pass and the NMOS M₁, I_load1 is the current of the load I_load1, I_load2 is the current of the load I_load2, I_pass is the current through the pass element R_pass, and I_shunt is the current through NMOS M₁.

Maximum or increased efficiency occurs when I_load1=I−i and I_load2=I+i. In this case, the shunt element is off while R_pass conducts 2i:

${\eta }_{\max }=\frac{I-i+I+i}{I-i+I+i+2i+0}=\frac{1}{1+i\text{/}I}$

The minimum or decreased efficiency occurs when I_load1=I+i and I_load2=I−i. In this case, the shunt element conducts 4i while R_pass conducts 2i:

${\eta }_{\min }=\frac{I+i+I-i}{I+i+I-i+2i+4i}=\frac{2I}{2I+6i}$ ${\eta }_{\min }=\frac{1}{1+3i\text{/}I}$

Thus, the ladder topology's efficiency may be a factor of the normalized variance i/I between loads. In systems where the load variance, and spread between loads, can be managed effectively, power losses can be kept within acceptable levels. Efficiency versus normalized variance i/I is plotted in FIG. 5. Referring to FIG. 5, when a load variance is large, the efficiency may become lower. Thus, if the load variance can be regulated to become smaller, the circuit's efficiency can be increased.

Consecutive stages of loads and shunt elements may be added under a 2-stage ladder in series to form the N-stage ladder circuit according to another embodiment, shown in FIG. 6. The N-stage ladder circuit may occur as any multi-stage ladder circuit. Any number of stages may be provided. For example, two, three, four, five, six, or more stages may be arranged. N can be any whole number of 2 or greater. As in FIG. 4, the first load I_load1 is connected in parallel to a pass element R_pass, where the sizing of the pass element may remain the same. The remaining loads I_load2, . . . I_loadN are coupled with shunt elements.

Non-limiting examples of a pass element include resistors, capacitors, inductors, and another electronic circuit. In some embodiments, a pair of stages may be inserted with another electronic element/circuit. In some cases, there may be a variation in the circuitry; for instance, the unregulated stage may be simply a pass device (e.g., resistor or diode) instead of a load in parallel with the pass element R_pass, similar to traditional shunt topology.

The input voltage, V_in, may be divided evenly among the loads in the ladder, that is, V_out=V_in/N where V_out is the supply voltage for each load. The choice of N for a given load generally depends on the available V_in, which is the intermediate bus voltage provided by the IT equipment's AC/DC power supply unit (PSU), typically 12V, 24V, 48V or 56V. For example, a 12V input and loads with nominal operating voltage of 0.8V may require a ladder of 15 stages to regulate the supply voltages to the nominal 0.8V.

Efficiency for the N-stage ladder is:

$\eta =\frac{P_{\mathrm{out}}}{P_{\mathrm{out}}+P_{\mathrm{loss}}}=\frac{V_{\mathrm{out}}*{\sum }_{n=1}^NI_{\mathrm{load},n}}{V_{\mathrm{out}}*{\sum }_{n=1}^NI_{\mathrm{load},n}+V_{\mathrm{out}}I_{\mathrm{pass}}+V_{\mathrm{out}}*{\sum }_{n=1}^NI_{\mathrm{shunt},n}}$ $\eta =\frac{{\sum }_{n-=1}^NI_{\mathrm{load},n}}{{\sum }_{n=1}^NI_{\mathrm{load},i}+I_{\mathrm{pass}}+{\sum }_{n=1}^NI_{\mathrm{shunt},n}}$

Maximum or increased efficiency occurs when I_load1=I−i and I_load,n=I+i. In this case, the shunts are off while R_pass conducts 2i:

${\eta }_{\max }=\frac{I-i+{\sum }_{n=1}^N\left(I+i\right)}{I-i+{\sum }_{n=1}^N\left(I+i\right)+2i+0}=\frac{\mathrm{NI}+\left(N-2\right)i}{\mathrm{NI}+\mathrm{Ni}}$ ${\eta }_{\max }=\frac{1+\left(1-2\text{/}N\right)i\text{/}I}{1+i\text{/}I}$

Minimum or decreased efficiency occurs when I_load1=I+i and I_load,n=I−i. In this case, the shunts conduct 4i while R_pass conducts 2i:

${\eta }_{\min }=\frac{P_{\mathrm{out}}}{P_{\mathrm{in}}}=\frac{V_{\mathrm{out}}\left(I+i\right)+V_{\mathrm{out}}{\sum }_{n=1}^N\left(I-i\right)}{{\mathrm{NV}}_{\mathrm{out}}\left(I+i+2i\right)}=\frac{1-i\text{/}I+\left(2\text{/}N\right)i\text{/}I}{1+3i\text{/}I}$ ${\eta }_{\min }=\frac{1-\left(1-2\text{/}N\right)i\text{/}I}{1+3i\text{/}I}$

Efficiency versus number of stages, with normalized load variance of 10% is plotted in FIG. 7. As FIG. 7 depicts, an increase in the number of stages may lead to a higher maximum efficiency and a lower minimum efficiency.

Based on the above, the linear stacked-shunt ladder topology may hold one or more of the following properties/characteristics:

• • 1. Efficiency is a function of number of stages and loading mismatch between stages, and efficiency approaches 100% as number of stages increases and loading mismatch reduces. The topology may be very attractive in systems which can dynamically control the loads to maximize efficiency.
  • 2. Maximum power dissipation in the shunt elements may be equal to four times the load variance.
  • 3. Similar to the traditional shunt regulator, the stacked-shunt ladder regulator described herein may behave like a constant power topology.

The stacked-shunt ladder regulator described herein comprises an adjustable shunt element. The adjustable shunt element comprises an NMOS. However, in other embodiments instead of an NMOS, other devices may be used to provide the same result, including but not limited to, p-type metal-oxide-semiconductor (PMOS) transistors and NPN/PNP-type bipolar junction transistors (BJTs). Some circuit modifications may accommodate specific shunt elements. For example, PMOS/PNP devices are naturally high-side shunts while NMOS/NPN devices are low-side shunts.

To utilize PMOS/PNP shunts, the unregulated stage becomes ground-referenced as shown according to still another embodiment in FIG. 8. FIG. 8 illustrates n stages of a stacked-shunt ladder regulator 800 according to still another embodiment. The first stage includes a capacitor C₁, a PMOS M₁, an error amplifier U₁, a pass device R₁, node N₁, and node N₂. An input voltage V_in is connected to node N₁. A first end of the capacitor C₁ is connected to node N₁ and a second end of the capacitor C₁ is connected to a node N₂. The source of the PMOS M₁ is connected to the node N₁ and the drain is connected to node N₂. The gate of the PMOS M₁ is connected to the output of the error amplifier U₁. A positive input terminal of the error amplifier U₁ is connected to node N₁. A first end of the pass device R₁ is connected to node N₁ and a second end of the pass device R₁ is connected to a negative input terminal of the error amplifier U₁. A first end of a pass device R₂ from the second stage is also connected to the negative input terminal of the error amplifier U₁. A load I₁ is connected between node N₁ and node N₂.

The second stage includes a capacitor C₂, a PMOS M₂, an error amplifier U₂, the pass device R₂, the node N₂ and a node N₃. A first end of the capacitor C₂ is connected to node N₂ and a second end of the capacitor C₁ is connected to node N₃. The source of the PMOS M₂ is connected to node N₂ and the drain is connected to node N₃. The gate of the PMOS M₂ is connected to the output of the error amplifier U₂. A positive input terminal of the error amplifier U₂ is connected to node N₂ and a second end of the pass device R₂ is connected to a negative input terminal of the error amplifier U₂. A first end of a pass device R₃ from the third stage is also connected to the negative input terminal of the error amplifier U₂. A load I₂ is connected between node N₂ and node N₃.

Each of the subsequent stages includes the same components and is connected to the preceding stage as described for the second stage, except for the n^th stage, which is that last stage that is unregulated. As described above the unregulated stage is ground-referenced. The last stage includes capacitor C_n, pass device R_n, and node N. A first end of the capacitor C_n is connected to node N_n and a second end of the capacitor C_n is connected to ground. A first end of the pass device R_n is connected to a negative input terminal of an error amplifier U_n−1 from the preceding stage and a second end of the pass device R_n is connected to ground. A load I_n is connected between node N_n and ground.

According to the various embodiments herein, properties and/or characteristics of loads suitable for the ladder topology include, but not limited to, (a) low current transient characteristics (relatively constant current or controlled current device); (b) a start-up mechanism to control the ramp rate of current from idle load to full load; and (c) once at full load, remain at full load until power is removed from the system. The system as a whole may consist of several similar loads described above with properties (a)-(c). In one embodiment, each load is an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) designed to perform Bitcoin mining operations, such as computing cryptographic hashes at a high rate.

AC Small Signal Analysis

A small signal model of the circuit can be obtained by considering only one feedback loop and its loading effects. An example small signal model is shown in FIG. 9. The small signal model includes a current source G connected in parallel to multiple load impedances R(V_out/I_out) and multiple shunt MOSFET drain-source impedances R_DS. Multiple bulk output capacitances C and their corresponding parasitic resistance ESR are also connected in parallel to the current source G. The current source G is connected to a circuit that includes an opamp U₁ with a positive input terminal connected to a voltage source V_s and a negative input connected to ground. An output of the opamp U₁ is connected to a node N₁. A first end of a gate resistance R_g is connected to node N₁ and a second end of the gate resistance R_g is connected to a node N₂. A first end of an output impedance R_OA of the opamp U₁ is connected to node N₁ and a second end is connected to ground. A first end of gate capacitance C_g is connected to node N₂ and a second end is connected to ground. The gate capacitance C_g is connected in parallel to the current source G.

An N-stage series-parallel resistor/capacitor output loading can be simplified as shown in FIG. 10, where:

$R_L=R_e*\left(1-1\text{/}N\right)$ $R_e=R\parallel R_{\mathrm{DS}}$ ${\mathrm{ESR}}_L=\mathrm{ESR}*\left(1-1\text{/}N\right)$ $C_L=\frac{C}{1-1\text{/}N}$

In this simplified model, there exists two poles and one zero in the transfer function. First, an isolated pole formed in the feedback path by the MOSFET gate capacitance:

$p_1=-\frac{1}{\left(R_{\mathrm{oa}}+R_g\right)C_g}$

A second pole is formed by the loading capacitance:

$p_2=-\frac{1}{\left(R_L+{\mathrm{ESR}}_L\right)C_L}$

Finally the zero is formed by the series resistance with the loading capacitance:

$z_1=-\frac{1}{{\mathrm{ESR}}_L*C_L}$

Auto-Balance Shunt Circuitry

In some embodiments, the laddered shunt circuitry comprises one or more series-connected loads. The load current is directly proportional or inversely proportional to clock frequency. For instance, a clock operates in a nominal frequency of 1 GHz for a load current 1 A; when the clock operates in slightly higher frequency, say 1.1 GHz, the load current is driven with 1.1 A. Non-limiting examples of the nominal frequency include a frequency between 1 Hz and 10 Hz, or between 10 Hz and 100 Hz, or between 100 Hz and 1K Hz, or between 1K Hz and 10K Hz, or between 10K Hz and 100K Hz, or between 100K Hz and 1 G Hz, or between 1 G Hz and 10 G Hz, or 10 G Hz and higher.

FIG. 11 shows an example of 2-stage ladder with auto-balance control. The first stage includes a first voltage-controlled oscillator (VCO) connected to a first reference voltage V_ref with voltage level V₃. The first VCO outputs a clock CLK₁ to a load I_load1 connected between a node N₁ and a node N₂. An input voltage V_in is connected to node N₁ and serves as the output voltage V_out1 for the load I_load1. Load I_load1 is uncontrolled and serves as a reference for all other stages to match. The second stage includes a second reference voltage V_ref with a voltage level V₂, an error amplifier U₁, and a second VCO. The second reference voltage V_ref is connected to a positive input terminal of the error amplifier U₁. A negative input terminal of the error amplifier U₁ is connected to node N₂. An output of the amplifier U₁ is connected to the second VCO. Under control of the output signal from the error amplifier U₁, the second VCO outputs a clock CLK₂ to a load I_load2. The load I_load2 is connected between node N₂ and ground to receive the output voltage V_out2 which is regulated.

As the output voltage V_out2 deviates from the second reference voltage V_ref, the error amplifier U₁ oppositely trims the clock CLK₂ of load I_load2 from its nominal frequency until the output voltage V_out2 matches the second reference voltage V_ref. This action is referred to as auto-balancing since the control circuits automatically equalize the load currents to achieve per-load voltage regulation.

More specifically, to regulate the output voltage V_out2, the error amplifier U₁ compares the output voltage V_out2 to the second reference voltage V_ref and generates a control signal ctrl. If the output voltage V_out2 is greater than the second reference voltage V_ref, the control signal ctrl will have a negative polarity. The greater the magnitude of the control signal ctrl with the negative polarity, the more the second VCO decreases the frequency of the clock CLK₂ in order to decrease the output voltage V_out2. However, if the output voltage V_out2 is less than the second reference voltage V_ref, the control signal ctrl will have a positive polarity. The greater the magnitude of the control signal ctrl with the positive polarity, the more the second VCO increases the frequency of the clock CLK₂ in order to increase the output voltage V_out2.

FIG. 12 shows an example N-stage ladder. As can be seen, consecutive stages may be added under the 2-stage ladder of FIG. 11 in series to form the N-stage ladder circuit. For example, two, three, four, five, six, or more stages may be arranged. N can be any whole number of 2 or greater. Like in FIG. 11, each stage in the N-stage ladder, except for the first stage, regulates an output voltage V_out of a load I_load.

If unregulated, a ladder circuit of N loads, each with nominal load current I and variance i, has a maximum voltage deviation of:

$\frac{\Delta V}{V}\left[\%\right]=\frac{2\left(1-1\text{/}N\right)i\text{/}I}{1+\left(1-2\text{/}N\right)i\text{/}I}*100\%$

$\frac{\Delta V}{V}$

versus i/I and number of loads N is plotted in FIG. 13 and FIG. 14. The more loads, the larger the voltage deviation; the higher load variance, the higher voltage deviation. In other words, when voltage has high variance, the load current may become much unstable, and vice versa. Voltage regulators help avoid these situations. To remove the voltage deviation, a circuit may compensate for the variance i which exists between loads. One method of compensation may be based on utilizing a shunt device to sink additional current as described above. However, the additional current carried by the shunts may be burned as power losses and are proportional to the loading mismatch. As a result, efficiency suffers under a worse case with loading mismatch. Instead of sinking additional current to compensate for loading mismatch, a lossless method of achieving the same goal would be to adjust the load directly until the load currents are matched.

For digital integrated circuits, the load current may be proportional to the clock rate. Thus, it is conceivable to build a circuit which can trim the load current by means of adjusting the clock rate away from its nominal value to compensate for variance i described above.

An auto-balance circuit utilizes an error amplifier in negative feedback to drive a voltage-controlled oscillator. By comparing the load voltage to a reference, the error amplifier may create a control voltage representing the error between the desired load voltage and the actual load voltage. The control signal is fed into a voltage-controlled oscillator, which may trim the load's clock rate in opposition to the error in load voltage, until the error reaches 0.

The auto-balance circuit may ensure each load consumes equal current, thus maintaining equal voltage across each load, without consuming additional power. While system performance is affected, the power efficiency excluding the control circuits may be 100%.

In an embodiment, the system performance may be proportional to the clock rate, the worst case system performance can be determined given the above architecture. With a ladder of N loads, consuming nominal current I with variance i, the worst case performance (normalized) occurs when I_load1=1−i/I and I_load,N=1+i/I. In this condition, the reference load consumes the least power per unit performance while all others consume the most power per unit performance. Thus, I_load,N are scaled down by 2i/I to match I_load1. Expressed as performance efficiency, this becomes:

${\eta }_{\mathrm{perf}}\left[\%\right]=\frac{1+\left(N-1\right)\left(1-2i\text{/}I\right)}{N}=1-2\left(1-1\text{/}N\right)i\text{/}I\left[\%\right]$

As N becomes large, the worst case performance impact approaches 2i/I, or twice the normalized load current variation. In other words, in some applications where there are too may stages, the overall performance may be deteriorated by a percentage of 2i/I.

A person of ordinary skill in the art will recognize many variations may exist based on the teaching described herein. The steps may be completed in a different order. Steps may be added or deleted. Some of the steps may comprise sub-steps. Many of the steps may be repeated as often as if beneficial to the platform.

Each of the examples as described herein can be combined with one or more other examples. Further, one or more components of one or more examples can be combined with other examples.

Reference is made to the following claims which are part of the present disclosure, including combinations recited by multiple dependent claims dependent upon multiple dependent claims, which combinations will be understood by a person of ordinary skill in the art and are part of the present disclosure.

While preferred examples of the present invention have been shown and described herein, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that such examples are provided by way of example only. It is not intended that the invention be limited by the specific examples provided within the specification. While the invention has been described with reference to the aforementioned specification, the descriptions and illustrations of the examples herein are not meant to be construed in a limiting sense. Numerous variations, changes, and substitutions will now occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the invention. Furthermore, it shall be understood that all aspects of the invention are not limited to the specific depictions, configurations or relative proportions set forth herein which depend upon a variety of conditions and variables. It should be understood that various alternatives to the examples of the invention described herein may be employed in practicing the invention. It is therefore contemplated that the invention shall also cover any such alternatives, modifications, variations or equivalents. It is intended that the following claims define the scope of the invention and that methods and structures within the scope of these claims and their equivalents be covered thereby.

Claims

1. A voltage regulator circuit for regulating output voltages across a plurality of loads at a plurality of output nodes, the output nodes including at least a first node, a second node, and a third node, a first load coupled between a first output voltage at the first node and a second output voltage at the second node, and a second load coupled between the second output voltage at the second node and the third node, the voltage regulator circuit comprising: a first stage including a pass element coupled between the first node and the second node in parallel to the first load and passing a current from the first node to the second node; anda second stage coupled in series with the first stage, the second stage including: an error amplifier coupled to a reference voltage at a first input terminal and the second output voltage at a second input terminal, and configured to generate a control signal at an output terminal based on a comparison between the second output voltage and the reference voltage, the control signal at a first polarity responsive to the second output voltage being greater than the reference voltage and at a second polarity responsive to the second output voltage being less than the reference voltage;an adjustable element configured to adjust the current from the first node to the second node responsive to the control signal, the adjustable element increasing the current responsive to the control signal at the first polarity and decreasing the current responsive to the control signal at the second polarity to regulate the second output voltage at the second node.

2. The voltage regulator circuit of claim 1, wherein the adjustable element is a transistor, and a shunt current through the transistor increased responsive to the control signal at the first polarity and decreased responsive to the control signal at the second polarity.

3. The voltage regulator circuit of claim 2, wherein the transistor is a n-type metal-oxide-semiconductor (NMOS) transistor.

4. The voltage regulator circuit of claim 1, wherein the pass element is a resistor, capacitor or an inductor.

5. The voltage regulator circuit of claim 1, wherein the plurality of nodes comprise a fourth node, a third load coupled between a third output voltage at the third node and the fourth node, the voltage regulator circuit further comprising: a third stage coupled in series with the second stage, the third stage comprising: an additional error amplifier coupled to an additional reference voltage at a third input terminal and the third output voltage at a fourth input terminal, and configured to generate an additional control signal at an additional output terminal based on a comparison between the third output voltage and the additional reference voltage, the additional control signal at the first polarity responsive to the third output voltage being greater than the additional reference voltage and at the second polarity responsive to the third output voltage being less than the additional reference voltage;an additional adjustable element configured to adjust a shunt current from the second node to the third node responsive to the additional control signal, the additional adjustable element increasing the shunt current responsive to the additional control signal at the first polarity and decreasing the shunt current responsive to the additional control signal at the second polarity to regulate the third output voltage at the third node.

6. The voltage regulator circuit of claim 1, wherein the voltage regulator circuit includes N stages and the first node is coupled to an input voltage that is N times a voltage difference between the first node and the second node, wherein N is an integer not less than two.

7. The voltage regulator circuit of claim 1, wherein responsive to the error amplifier generating the control signal with the first polarity and a magnitude, the adjustable element further configured to increase the current by an amount according to the magnitude of the control signal.

8. The voltage regulator circuit of claim 1, wherein responsive to the error amplifier generating the control signal with the second polarity and a magnitude, the adjustable element further configured to decrease the current by an amount according to the magnitude of the control signal.

9. A voltage regulator circuit for regulating output voltages across a plurality of loads at a plurality of output nodes, the output nodes including at least a first node, a second node, and a third node, a first load coupled between a first output voltage at the first node and a second output voltage at the second node, and a second load coupled between the second output voltage at the second node and the third node, the voltage regulator circuit comprising: a first stage including a first voltage controlled oscillator coupled to a first reference voltage and configured to output a first clock signal to the first load; anda second stage coupled in series with the first stage, the second stage including: an error amplifier coupled to a second reference voltage at a first input terminal and the second output voltage at a second input terminal, and configured to generate a control signal at an output terminal based on a comparison between the second output voltage and the second reference voltage, the control signal at a first polarity responsive to the second output voltage being greater than the second reference voltage and at a second polarity responsive to the second output voltage being less than the second reference voltage;a second voltage controlled oscillator configured to adjust a second clock signal output to the second load, the second voltage controlled oscillator decreasing a frequency of the second clock signal responsive to the control signal at the first polarity and increasing the frequency of the second clock signal responsive to the control signal at the second polarity to regulate the second output voltage at the second node.

10. The voltage regulator circuit of claim 9, wherein a frequency of the first clock signal is fixed to a nominal frequency of the first load.

11. The voltage regulator circuit of claim 9, wherein the first node is coupled to an input voltage of the voltage regulator circuit.

12. The voltage regulator circuit of claim 9, wherein the plurality of nodes comprise a fourth node, a third load coupled between a third output voltage at the third node and the fourth node, the voltage regulator circuit further comprising: a third stage coupled in series with the second stage, the third stage comprising: an additional error amplifier coupled to a third reference voltage at a third input terminal and the third output voltage at a fourth input terminal, and configured to generate an additional control signal at an additional output terminal based on a comparison between the third output voltage and the third reference voltage, the additional control signal at the first polarity responsive to the third output voltage being greater than the additional reference voltage and at the second polarity responsive to the third output voltage being less than the additional reference voltage;a third voltage controlled oscillator configured to adjust a third clock signal output to the third load, the third voltage controlled oscillator decreasing a frequency of the third clock signal responsive to the additional control signal at the first polarity and increasing the frequency of the third clock signal responsive to the additional control signal at the second polarity to regulate the third output voltage at the third node.

13. The voltage regulator circuit of claim 9, wherein responsive to the error amplifier generating the control signal with the first polarity and a magnitude, the second voltage controlled oscillator further configured to decrease the frequency of the second clock signal by an amount according to the magnitude of the control signal.

14. The voltage regulator circuit of claim 9, wherein responsive to the error amplifier generating the control signal with the second polarity and a magnitude, the second voltage controlled oscillator further configured to increase the frequency of the second clock signal by an amount according to the magnitude of the control signal.