The invention relates to a ladle bottom being part of a metallurgical ladle for treating a metal melt as well as a corresponding metallurgical ladle.
Such a ladle bottom is made of a refractory ceramic body providing an upper surface, a lower surface and a pouring channel extending between upper surface and lower surface. As part of the ladle the ladle bottom is fitted within one end of a corresponding wall portion, wherein the wall extends from the outer periphery of the ladle bottom.
Ladle and ladle bottom each are described hereinafter in a position when the ladle bottom is arranged horizontally and at the lower end of the ladle.
A metal melt is poured (cast) into the ladle via an open upper end of the ladle. The metal stream first hits the ladle bottom, before being redirected to flow along the upper surface of the ladle bottom and towards the pouring channel (outlet nozzle), which is in many applications closed at this stage of the casting process by a filler sand to avoid uncontrolled outflow of the metal melt. During this stage of the casting process several problems arise, inter alia:
To solve the wear problem numerous proposals have been made. To reduce such wear it is known to use refractory materials for said impact area which are less prone to wear and/or to provide a discrete, so-called impact pad which is arranged on top of the upper bottom surface.
The filler sand problem hasn't been solved yet.
The filler material further causes problems during gas treatment of the melt in the ladle. Typically such treatment gas is fed into the metal melt via so called gas purging plugs (German: Gasspülsteine), arranged in the bottom and/or wall portion of the ladle, causing turbulences within the melt volume. Filler sand again is accidentally flushed away by these turbulences before tapping starts.
This is true in particular during so-called “hard stirring”, being defined by a gas volume of >40 m3/h (typically 40-70 m3/h) for an industrial ladle comprising 100.000 to 300.000 kg metal melt. “Soft stirring” describes a gas treatment with gas volumes below said 40 m3/h, in particular volumes of 10-30 m3/h.
The problems caused by gas flushing haven't been solved either yet.
Another concern is to reduce the amount of any metal remaining in the ladle after tapping (metal melt outflow into successive installations). Typically a considerable amount of metal melt remains onto the ladle bottom, solidifies and must be treated before refilling the ladle.
The invention therefore has the object to provide a technical solution to improve one or more of the following issues:
During intensive investigations, including water modelings and mathematical studies it has been found that various factors are responsible for the drawbacks mentioned, inter alia:
Considering these and other factors it was found that the drawbacks mentioned may be at least reduced by using a ladle bottom comprising the following features:
and a maximum horizontal area
wherein r=radius of the ladle bottom and r≧0.75 m with rmax=2 m for all ladle bottoms with an effective radius of ≧2 m, and Π=pi=3.14 (hereinafter called formulae I), and/or
The main feature is the so-called diffusor box. The term “diffusor box” implements its main task, namely to slow down the speed of the metal melt on its way off the ladle.
Considerable improvements are possible if this diffusor box is varied in such a way that it comprises a further indentation (deepened section in the diffusor box bottom). This gradation (smaller diffusor box following a larger diffusor box in the outflow direction of the metal melt) may be repeated one or more times, e.g. the indentation again may be followed by a recessed space extending from part of the bottom area or the indentation, etc.
In other words: In addition to the (main) diffusor box (of arbitrary size) as mentioned above these embodiments are characterized by one or more additional diffusor boxes, arranged as follows (seen in the flow direction of the melt on its way from the ladle through the pouring channel into subsequent installations):
It was witnessed that the predominant part of melt remaining in the ladle follows the successively arranged deepened sections around the outlet channel. This leads unambiguously to a considerable reduction of the metal melt volume remaining in the ladle after tapping/emptying (deutsch: Pfannenabstich).
The invention therefore relates—in its most general embodiment—to a ladle bottom made of a refractory ceramic body with an upper surface, a lower surface and a pouring channel extending between upper surface and lower surface, further comprising a diffusor box, being defined by a deepened section of said upper surface, wherein the said diffusor box is characterized by the following features:
The pouring channel defines an outlet channel for the metal melt, i. e. a passageway along which the melt leaves the ladle. In view of the at least two subsequent diffusor boxes of different size the upper section of the pouring channel is defined by the said diffusor boxes (main diffusor box and indentation) and thus characterized by an upper end of large cross section (the horizontal extension of the diffusor box), an intermediate part of medium sized cross section (the indentation) and a lower end of small cross section. In other words: The pouring channel according to the invention is characterized by a stepped upper part and a conventional lower part of substantially constant cross section.
As mentioned above this design may be completed by adding one or more further deepened sections within the bottom layout. Accordingly the ladle bottom—inter alia—may further comprise
“Secondary, tertiary, quaternary upper surfaces” define the bottom area of the successive deepened sections of said outflow area.
Embodiments with one, two and three deepened sections are represented and further disclosed in the attached drawing and corresponding description.
This general concept of stepped depressions, wherein the vertically lower (downstream) depression always being of smaller (horizontal) size than the depression arranged vertically on top (upstream), may be varied/completed by numerous features, inter alia:
The provision and design of the diffusor box, indentation and/or recessed space as well as any further depressions is important to reduce the kinetic energy of the metal melt before the melt reaches the inlet end of the lower section of the pouring channel and thus before the melt gets in contact with any filler material (filler sand) within and/or on top of the pouring channel. It is as well important to reduce turbulences of the melt within the ladle during gas purging treatment.
The (upper) diffusor box is arranged at a distance to the impact area to reduce the effect of splashing around the impact area and to provide a sufficient distance between impact area and pouring channel.
According to one embodiment the distance between a central point along the upper surface of the impact area and a central point along the upper surface of the diffusor box is about 30 to 75% of the maximum horizontal extension of the ladle bottom, with possible lower limits at 40, 45 or 50% and possible upper limits at 65 and 70%. With the minimum diameter of the ladle bottom being defined at 1.5 m good results are achieved with distances of 500 to 1200 mm. With the maximum diameter considered in the disclosed formulae being set at 4 m, even in cases of a ladle bottom with an effective diameter of >4 m, good results are achieved with distances of >1500 mm for large ladle bottoms.
The “central point” of the impact area may be defined as that point which the central longitudinal axis of the metal stream flowing into the ladle hits. The central point of the diffusor box is the geometrical centre, which may fall into the area defined by the lower end of the pouring channel (in corresponding vertical extension).
The disclosed overall size (in m2) of the diffusor box may be set according to formulae I, especially in cases with no further deepened sections. In designs with one or more (n) further deepened sections the size of the topmost diffuser box is less critical. The upper and lower limits recognize the influence of gas purging during a secondary metallurgical treatment of a melt in the ladle. These limits are valuable for the reduction of turbulences in the space defined by the diffusor box and especially next to its surface.
Typically the speed of the metal melt next to the upper surface of the ladle bottom is up to 0.3 m/s. High speeds are due to “hard stirring”, lower values may prevail during “soft stirring”. Insofar Amax is mainly influenced by “soft stirring” while Amin defines the preferred size in case of “hard stirring”.
In other words: The melt is typically gas treated in the ladle by “soft stirring” and “hard stirring” intervals. Insofar the overall size of the diffusor box is defined by both.
In cases when “hard stirring” dominates the overall size of the surface area of the diffusor box can be <(Amin+Amax)/2, best as close as possible to Amin while it can be >(Amin+Amax)/2 in case of “soft stirring” prevails and then as close as possible to Amax. A surface area of exactly (Amin+Amax)/2 is a compromise between the two alternatives. Similar results may be achieved with an overall surface area of the diffusor box in the range of +/−10% or +/−20% of (Amin+Amax)/2.
In case of “hard stirring” it is further preferred to provide a diffusor box with a height of the step at the upper end of the disclosed range, especially >80 mm or >100 mm.
In all embodiments filler sand is flushed off much less during gas purging compared with conventional designs of ladle bottoms as mentioned above.
To reduce accidental wear of filler material It is further advantageous to keep a minimum distance between any gas purging element and the pouring channel. Preferably there are no gas flushing/purging elements in the diffusor box area and the minimum distance is defined correspondingly to the minimum distance between impact spot and pouring channel.
The following table quotes useful upper and lower values of the so-called secondary upper surface of the diffusor box [in m2]:
It may vary depending on the number (1 . . . n) of subsequent deepened sections like the said indentation and recessed space.
The absolute upper value (Amax) may be set at 2.3 m2, 2.2 m2, 2.1 m2 or 2.0 m2. The overall size (Amin) of the diffusor box is important as well to allow the metal melt to distribute over the diffusor area and thus to further slow down. Amax is important to allow a sufficient (minimum) distance between impact area (and/or gas purging element) and pouring channel. The same is true with respect to any further deepened sections following the diffusor box in a downstream direction.
Finally the position of the successive deepened spaces and the lower section of the pouring channel influence the required effect. It is recommended to arrange the vertical axis of the lower section of the pouring channel offset to any steps and offset the ladle wall.
In case of a pouring channel with a diameter of X mm (for example: 40 mm) the minimum distance between the lower part of the pouring channel and any corresponding step should be 3X (for example 120 mm) but may reach 7X or more.
The invention includes a ladle comprising a bottom as mentioned above. Both (ladle and ladle bottom) are shown in the attached drawing.
The invention further provides an embodiment characterized by a dam like protrusion between impact area and diffusor box in order to further reduce the melt speed flowing along the bottom area from said impact area toward said diffusor box. This protrusion extends substantially perpendicular to a direction along which the corresponding metal melt will flow from the impact area into the diffusor box after hitting the impact area. In other words: The melt is temporarily stopped in front of the protrusion (barrier) and may only continue its flow after having passed the said obstacle.
Further features of the invention may be derived from the sub-claims and the other application documents
The size of the diffusor box may be defined alternatively or as an additional condition to the formulae I by the following formulae II: The thus preferred area of the diffusor box is characterized by the intersection of formulae I and formulae II respectively.
Amin=x+10/161·In [M]
Amax=5y+4/25·In [M]
with
The attached drawing schematically represents in
The same numerals are used for parts providing the same or at least similar features.
The ladle of
A metal stream is shown by arrow M, entering the ladle by its open end 14, flowing vertically downwardly before hitting an impact area 10i of the upper surface 10o of ladle bottom 10.
At least part of the metal stream continues its flow (arrow F) towards a pouring channel 16 arranged offset to said impact area 10i, which pouring channel 16 runs from upper surface 10o to lower surface 10u.
As shown in
In a prior ladle according to
The ladle design according to
The diffusor box DB is characterized by a recess within upper surface 10o, i.e. a section deepened with respect to the adjacent areas of upper surface 10o and thus providing a step S along the border (borderline, periphery) B of said diffusor box DB. The upper surface section of diffusor box DB is referred to hereinafter as secondary upper surface 10od. The vertical part of said step S forms a right angle with respect to both adjacent sections of the upper bottom surface 10o and secondary upper surface 10od.
The diffusor box DB has a mainly rectangular secondary upper surface 10od. A well nozzle 18 (German: Lochstein) is arranged in the bottom portion 10d of the diffusor box DB. The central through opening of said well nozzle 18 defines a lower part of pouring channel 16, while the diffusor box DB itself defines the widened upper part of pouring channel 16.
An inner nozzle 20—known per se—is arranged downstream within the lower part of said well nozzle 18, followed in a conventional way by a sliding gate with sliding plates 24, 26 and an outer nozzle 22.
The lower part of the pouring channel 16 is filled with filler sand FS, including a sand cone SC on top of well nozzle 18—similar to
The dimensions of said diffusor box DB are as follows:
The melt stream M hits the impact area 10i (with CP1 being the central hitting point) in a conventional way but its speed is then slowed down on its way to the lower section of pouring channel 16 by said diffusor box DB and especially by said step S, which at the same time redirects the melt stream M twice (
By this means the filler material FS is protected from being flushed away until the ladle is filled more or less completely and the pouring channel 16 opened in a conventional way.
The filler material remains more or less intact and at its place, even in case of a (conventional) gas treatment of the melt as the then rotating melt “overflows” said area of said diffusor box to a considerable extent with a considerably reduced speed. One of several gas purging plugs, installed in ladle bottom 10 is shown as GP. The distance between its central longitudinal axis and CP2 is 1020 mm.
The ladle bottom 10 of
Secondary upper surface 10od (the bottom surface of diffusor box DB) includes a further deepened section, called indentation IN hereinafter.
This indentation IN has a smaller horizontal cross section than diffusor box DB and extends at a distance to the peripheral steps S of diffusor box DB, thereby providing additional steps S2 and a tertiary upper surface 10oi.
The lower section of pouring channel 16 now extends from said tertiary upper surface 10oi downwardly.
In the embodiment of
In this embodiment tertiary upper surface 10oi is inclined by 4° to the horizontal.
All embodiments are characterized by several deviations for the metal stream on its way to the lower part of pouring channel 16, provided by said deepened sections (diffusor box DB, indentation IN, recessed space RD respectively) and their corresponding steps S, S2,S3, thereby slowing down the melt speed and allowing any remaining melt to leave the ladle almost completely.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
13183674 | Sep 2013 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2014/063565 | 6/26/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2015/036134 | 3/19/2015 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4746102 | Gilles | May 1988 | A |
4776570 | Vo Thanh | Oct 1988 | A |
5188796 | Soofi | Feb 1993 | A |
5348275 | Soofi | Sep 1994 | A |
5518153 | Zacharias | May 1996 | A |
20160031008 | Kohler | Feb 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2094954 | Sep 1982 | GB |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for App. No. PCT/EP2014/063585 dated Sep. 9, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160167126 A1 | Jun 2016 | US |