The invention relates to a lamellar or strip-shaped floor marking, in particular for means of transportation, very particularly for airplanes, having a photoluminescent layer on which covering elements which appear dark in comparison with the luminous layer and which serve as a directional indication are arranged in such a way that acute-angled markings pointing in a direction are formed.
It is known to affix lamellar or strip-shaped floor markings having a photoluminescent layer in airplanes. By means of daylight or the illumination in the airplane cabin, the photoluminescent layer is made to glow. This glow continues for a long period of time when the floor marking is no longer being illuminated. In the case of an accident, airplane passengers can orient themselves even in darkness by means of these glowing floor markings. An external illumination, which is complex and fault-prone, is not required.
These floor markings indicate escape routes. In this case there are also no particular problems if the airplane, as is conventional, is provided with emergency exits at the front and rear end of the airplane cabin (and usually also over the wings). In that case, it is not necessarily a matter of finding the nearest emergency exit in the case of an accident but rather, led by the glowing floor markings, of following the other passengers to the nearest exit. However, it is a different proposition if the airplane has a so-called “dead end”, that is to say if, for example, no emergency exit is provided at the rear end. There is then the danger that in the case of an accident passengers follow the floor markings in the wrong direction, namely to the end of a cabin not provided with an emergency exit. In order to avoid this, it is known to affix opaque markings in triangular form on the floor markings, the tip of the triangle pointing in the direction of the escape route. Such dark markings can be created by applying a coating, for example. The applied coating on the one hand prevents the photoluminescent layer underneath from being “charged” by incident light. On the other hand, light that is nevertheless emitted therefrom is absorbed by the markings. These markings usually have a distance between them of approximately 50 cm. A closer distance is clearly considered not to be expedient, because in this case there is no longer enough glowing surface of the floor marking available.
A problem now occurs if a passenger wishes to observe the marking in order to see in which direction the tip of the triangle is pointing. Due to the darkness, the cone cells of the retina of the eye, which impart color vision and only have a low light sensitivity, do not impart a sense of sight. This is only the case for the rod cells, which are active in the process of seeing light and dark and have a high light sensitivity. However, in the middle of the retina, the fovea, there are no or only very few rod cells which react to low brightness. Thus, if an attempt is made to look at the marking, so that the marking is imaged on the fovea, it is difficult to recognize the marking or it is not seen at all, since the brightness is not sufficient to excite the cone cells arranged in the fovea. This is particularly the case if the fluorescent layer is additionally covered by a film of paint, so that the floor marking no longer glows as brightly. Furthermore, problems occur particularly if the floor markings have been in the dark for an extended period of time, that is to say in the case of night flights or after the first time operation is commenced in the morning. The problems are further exacerbated if the floor markings only have a small width. In this case, the triangles would have to take up the entire width of the floor marking, so that likewise the recognition of them is worse.
However, the abovementioned problems do not only occur in the airplanes mentioned for the explanation, although this case is particularly important. Similar problems can also occur in different means of transportation or dark rooms, for example cinemas.
A floor marking of the type mentioned initially which allows a better detection of the direction of escape even in low adverse circumstances.
The covering elements extend over the entire width of the floor marking and taper on both sides at one of their ends so that a recess bounded by an acute-angled isosceles triangle is formed there, and the covering elements are substantially adjacent to one another, at least in groups, in such a way that the distance between them is smaller than approximately three times their longitudinal extent.
The covering elements extend over the entire width of the floor marking. Even in the case of narrower floor markings, the direction-indicating elements are then not that small that recognizing them presents any difficulties. Furthermore, dark triangles, the tips of which show the direction of escape, are not used. Rather, covering elements which taper on both sides at one of their ends so that a recess bounded by an acute-angled isosceles triangle is formed there are used. The tip of the triangle, which is intended to show the direction of escape, is thus, in contrast with the prior art, not dark but bright. This alone eases recognition of the direction of escape. However, in addition to this, the covers are substantially adjacent to one another, at least in groups, in such a way that the distance between them is smaller than approximately three times their longitudinal extent. Thus, if an attempt is made to precisely observe or locate a floor marking, then it is possible that no visible image is obtained in the fovea. However, immediately next to the marking which is being observed there one are other markings, which are imaged outside the fovea and can be seen there due to the very high light sensitivity of the rod cells arranged outside the fovea. Experiments have shown that the field of view which is insensitive from an observation height of 1.20 m (if the person is moving through the airplane in a stooped position due to the development of smoke) approximately has an a diameter of 200 mm. Directly outside this region, further markings will then be recognizable, so that the direction of the escape route can be recognized.
The covering elements can be produced by painting or adhesively bonding corresponding elements as is the case in the prior art.
Advantageously, the distance between the covering elements is smaller than or approximately equal to their longitudinal extent. Thus, one on the one hand, a plurality of direction-indicating triangles is always visible. In another advantageous embodiment this distance is greater, so that more glowing regions are exposed.
The covering elements are at least arranged in groups, wherein the distance between the groups, in which the floor marking is glowing evenly, should not be too big. However, in another advantageous embodiment such intermediate distances are avoided by all covers having the same separation.
At that end at which the covers are not provided with the acute-angled recess, they can be bounded by a straight line, to be precise transverse to the longitudinal direction of the floor marking. This could however mean that there is a certain psychological inhibition threshold, since not only triangles or arrows pointing in the direction of escape are provided, but also transversely running markings. This can be avoided if the covers converge at an acute angle at their other end, that is to say at that end at which they are not provided with the acute-angled recess. In this case, the angles at both ends advantageously have the same size.
The covers can then be arranged at such a distance from each other that the arrangement is chosen in such a way that the covers have the same shape, at least within groups, as the uncovered regions of the floor markings. In this manner successive bright and dark arrows which all point in the same direction are obtained.
Advantageously, the covering elements have a length which is 2 to 20 times the width of the floor marking. In this case, the isosceles recesses and protrusions expediently have a length which corresponds to half to a quarter of the length of the cover.
All these measures on the one hand ensure that, taking the physical and biological conditions of the visual process into account, markings which indicate the direction of escape can be seen in an optimum manner. This does not depend on a thought process; the passenger is automatically led in the direction of the exit, the markings being designed in such a way that they can be seen in an improved manner with aid of the physical and biological visual process.
Advantageously, the floor marking is covered by a non-slip and abrasion-resistant layer. In this case, the film is advantageously colored in order to give the floor marking the color which is particularly suited for its purpose.
If a reflective layer is arranged under the luminous layer, then light emitted downward by the luminous layer is also at least partially reflected upward and contributes to the brightness.
The floor marking can be attached particularly easily if it is designed to be self-adhesive or provided with a double-sided adhesive tape on its underside.
When airplanes are mentioned in the description above, then this is a preferred area of application. However, the floor marking can also be used for different purposes, for example for cinemas, theaters or other means of transportation.
Advantageous embodiments are described in an exemplary manner below with reference to the attached drawings, in which
As is shown in
As can be seen from
In the embodiments of
In the case of the embodiment of
A floor marking which provides reliable indications of the direction of escape even in the case of floor markings having a narrow width is thus created by the invention. According to the invention, it is possible to design the floor markings not with a width of 30 mm, which has been conventional until now, but with a smaller width of, for example, 17 mm.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
06007755 | Apr 2006 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2007/003182 | 4/10/2007 | WO | 00 | 6/2/2008 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2007/118641 | 10/25/2007 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2430534 | Rodli | Nov 1947 | A |
2802443 | Hanson | Aug 1957 | A |
2993465 | Ginsley et al. | Jul 1961 | A |
3322093 | Goland et al. | May 1967 | A |
3408025 | Davis | Oct 1968 | A |
4021948 | Mosch | May 1977 | A |
4179160 | Sabo | Dec 1979 | A |
4401050 | Britt et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4794373 | Harrison | Dec 1988 | A |
4801928 | Minter | Jan 1989 | A |
D305779 | Schriever | Jan 1990 | S |
5000111 | Gibson | Mar 1991 | A |
5027741 | Smith et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5101756 | Strumbos | Apr 1992 | A |
5331918 | Honigsbaum | Jul 1994 | A |
D356659 | Glass | Mar 1995 | S |
D373432 | Wu | Sep 1996 | S |
D383081 | Ffrench | Sep 1997 | S |
D388725 | Estrada | Jan 1998 | S |
5714255 | Yeh | Feb 1998 | A |
5917326 | Gonzalez et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6025773 | Bresnan | Feb 2000 | A |
6237266 | Tassey et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6472994 | Tator | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6499421 | Honigsbaum | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6739980 | Scott et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6854163 | Ruana | Feb 2005 | B1 |
7404372 | Aasgaard | Jul 2008 | B2 |
D588036 | Rees | Mar 2009 | S |
20020015309 | Stokes et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20030021933 | Milliorn et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030029372 | Moore | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20080092796 | Laivins et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080282961 | Halberg et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090217862 | Christensen | Sep 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 110 864 | Jun 1983 | GB |
WO 8702813 | May 1987 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090229510 A1 | Sep 2009 | US |