This invention relates generally to the field of gas turbine engines, and more particularly to a gas turbine engine component formed of a stacked plurality of ceramic matrix composite (CMC) lamellae.
Stacked lamellate construction is a known art for forming gas turbine engine parts. U.S. Pat. No. 3,378,228 describes an airfoil for a gas turbine that is formed of a stack of laminar sections of monolithic ceramic material. The stack is held together in compression by a metal tie bolt. U.S. Pat. No. 4,260,326 describes a similar arrangement that is further improved by a piston and cylinder arrangement that accommodates differential thermal expansion between the ceramic stack and the metal supporting structure.
The invention is explained in the following description in view of the drawings that show:
The assembly 10 will be acted upon by a variety of forces during operation of the gas turbine engine 12. Working gas flowing over the airfoil shape 16 will create lift forces and bending moments across the airfoil. Cooling air passing through the opening 18 at a pressure higher than the pressure of the working gas will create internal pressure forces P acting upon the inner peripheral surfaces 18 to cause a ballooning of the lamellae 14. Temperature transients, differences in steady state temperatures and differences between the coefficients of thermal expansion of the lamellae 14 and the support structure 20 will generate differential thermal growth within the assembly 10. To accommodate such movement while simultaneously resisting such forces, the lamella 14 is provided with an interlock feature 30 cooperatively interfaced with a respective interlock feature 32 of the support structure 20. The cooperating interlock features 30, 32 are effective to interconnect the support structure 20 and the lamellae 14 in order to transmit forces from the lamella 14 to the engine frame through the support structure 20, while at the same time accommodating differential thermal growth between the lamella 14 and the support structure 20. The interlock features 30, 32 comprise respective opposed, contacting, load-carrying surfaces 34, 36. In the embodiment of
The lamellae 14, 52 may be made of a ceramic matrix composite (CMC) material. A CMC material includes a ceramic matrix material 26 that hosts a plurality of reinforcing fibers 28. The CMC material may be anisotropic, at least in the sense that it can have different strength characteristics in different directions. Various factors, including material selection and fiber orientation, can affect the strength characteristics of a CMC material. The lamella 14, 52 can be made of a variety of materials, and embodiments of the invention are not limited to any specific materials. In one embodiment, the matrix material 26 may be alumina, and the fibers 28 may be an aluminosilicate composition consisting of approximately 70% Alumina and 28% Silica with 2% Boron (sold under the name NEXTEL™ 312). The fibers 28 can be provided in various forms, such as a woven fabric, blankets, unidirectional tapes, and mats. A variety of techniques are known in the art for making a CMC material.
Fiber material is not the sole determinant of the strength properties of a CMC material. Fiber direction can also affect the strength. In a CMC lamella 14 according to embodiments of the invention, the fibers 28 can be arranged to provide the assembly 10 with anisotropic strength properties. More specifically, the fibers 28 can be oriented in the lamella 14 to provide strength or strain tolerance in the direction of high stresses or strains. To that end, substantially all of the fibers 28 can be provided in the in-plane direction of the lamella 14; however, a CMC material according to embodiments of the invention can have some fibers 28 in the through thickness direction as well. “Substantially all” is intended to mean all of the fibers 28 or a sufficient majority of the fibers 28 so that the desired strength properties are obtained.
The planar direction fibers 28 of the CMC lamella 14 can be substantially unidirectional, substantially bi-directional or multi-directional. In a bi-directional lamella, one portion of the fibers can extend at one angle relative to the chord line and another portion of the fibers can extend at a different angle relative to the chord line such that the fibers cross. The crossing fibers may be oriented at about 90 degrees relative to each other, but other relative orientations are possible, such as at about 30, 45 or 60 degrees.
One particular CMC lamella 14 according to embodiments of the invention can have an in-plane tensile strength from about 150 megapascals (MPa) to about 200 MPa in the fiber direction and, more specifically, from about 160 MPa to about 184 MPa in the fiber direction. Further, such a lamella 14 can have an in-plane compressive strength from about 140 MPa to 160 MPa in the fiber direction and, more specifically, from about 147 MPa to about 152 MPa in the fiber direction. This particular CMC lamella 14 can be relatively weak in tension in the through thickness direction. For example, the through thickness tensile strength can be from about 3 MPa to about 10 MPa and, more particularly, from about 5 MPa to about 6 MPa, which is substantially lower than the in-plane tensile strengths discussed above. However, the lamella 14 can be relatively strong in compression in the through thickness direction. For example, the through thickness compressive strength of a lamella 14 according to embodiments of the invention can be from about −251 MPa to about −314 MPa. These strength values can be affected by temperature. Again, the above values are provided merely as examples, and embodiments of the invention are not limited to any specific strength in the in-plane or through thickness directions.
With this understanding, the plurality of lamella 14 can be substantially radially stacked in the thru-thickness direction to form the airfoil assembly 10 according to embodiments of the invention. The outer peripheral surface 16 of the stacked lamellae 14 can form the exterior airfoil shape of the assembly 10. A further coating (not shown) may be applied to the outer peripheral surface 16 to function as an environmental and/or thermal barrier coating. Once such coating is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,197,424, owned by the assignee of the present invention and incorporated by reference herein.
The individual lamella of an assembly can be substantially identical to each other. Alternatively, one or more lamella can be different from the other lamellae in a variety of ways including, for example, thickness, size, and/or shape.
It may be beneficial to design the ring segment assembly 82 so that thermal growth along the major axis of growth 100 does not result in the bending of the CMC material. The thermal growth along axis 100 (hereinafter referred to as horizontal) will be zero at some point along the component, for example the center of interlock features 88, 90 in the illustrated embodiment of
The plurality of laminates of the present invention can be held together in various manners.
Advantageously in certain embodiments, the individual lamellae need not be affixed to adjacent lamellae, but rather are supported primarily or only by the interlock features. Such embodiments are especially useful when there is no need to provide an air seal between adjacent lamellae.
The CMC lamellae according to embodiments of the invention can be made in a variety of ways. The CMC material may be provided initially in the form of a substantially flat plate, with the direction of the fibers within the plate being selected to optimize the performance of the end product. Water jet or laser cutting may be used to cut one or more lamellae from a single flat plate. Flat plate CMC can provide numerous advantages. At the present, flat plate CMC provides one of the strongest, most reliable and statistically consistent forms of the material. As a result, the design can avoid manufacturing difficulties that have arisen when fabricating tightly curved configurations. For example, flat plates are unconstrained during curing and thus do not suffer from anisotropic shrinkage strains. The assembly of the laminates in a stack may occur after each laminate is fully cured so as to avoid shrinkage issues. Flat, thin CMC plates also facilitate conventional non-destructive inspection. Furthermore, the method of construction reduces the criticality of delamination-type flaws, which are difficult to find. Moreover, dimensional control is more easily achieved as flat plates can be accurately formed and machined to shape using cost-effective cutting methods. A flat plate construction also enables scaleable and automated manufacture.
One or more lamellae according to embodiments of the invention can include a number of features to facilitate bonding of a material to the outer peripheral surface 16. For example, the outer peripheral surface 16 can have a rough finish after it is cut from a flat plate. Further, the laminates can be stacked in a staggered or offset manner or cut to slightly different sizes to create an uneven outer peripheral surface 16. Alternatively, or in addition to the above, the outer peripheral surface 16 can be tapered, such as by applying the cutting tool at an angle when the lamella is cut from a flat plate. The outer peripheral surface 16 may include one or more recesses and/or cutouts such as dovetail cutouts.
While various embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described herein, it will be obvious that such embodiments are provided by way of example only. Numerous variations, changes and substitutions may be made without departing from the invention herein. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention be limited only by the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation-in-part and claims benefit of the Dec. 2, 2004, filing date of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/002,028 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,153,096, which is incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3301526 | Chamberlain | Jan 1967 | A |
3378228 | Davies et al. | Apr 1968 | A |
3515499 | Beer et al. | Jun 1970 | A |
3619077 | Wile et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3778183 | Luscher et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
3872563 | Brown et al. | Mar 1975 | A |
4042162 | Meginnis et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4051289 | Adamson | Sep 1977 | A |
4221539 | Corrigan | Sep 1980 | A |
4260326 | Scott et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4314794 | Holden et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4472866 | Moracz et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4573872 | Nakata | Mar 1986 | A |
4583274 | Moracz et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4594053 | Sohngen | Jun 1986 | A |
5064727 | Naik et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5074753 | Covington et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5222297 | Graff et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5236151 | Hagle et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5269658 | Carlson et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5279892 | Baldwin et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5314309 | Blakeley et al. | May 1994 | A |
5439353 | Cook et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5640767 | Jackson et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5806796 | Healey | Sep 1998 | A |
6013592 | Merrill et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6197424 | Morrison et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6322322 | Rhodes et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6451416 | Holowczak et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6457939 | Ghasripoor et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6464456 | Darolia et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6514046 | Morrison et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6689246 | Hirahara et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6696144 | Holowczak et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6709230 | Morrison et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070020105 A1 | Jan 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11002028 | Dec 2004 | US |
Child | 11169477 | US |