Not applicable.
The present invention relates to the field of material handling vehicles, and more specifically to laminate bumper configurations that reduces transmissibility of energy to other components of the vehicle.
Bumpers are commonly used on most vehicles to help protect the vehicle from contact with an object, such as another vehicle, or a wall, or a guard rail, for example. The bumper typically consists of any protective guard or pad for absorbing the disturbance caused by the contact, and/or for reducing possible dents and dings to the vehicle.
Bumpers on material handling vehicles typically utilize either a metal bumper or a rubber bumper that is secured to the vehicle frame. Although both the metal bumper and rubber bumper work to help protect the vehicle and to improve the durability of the vehicle, the metal bumper creates a rigid joint and tends to transmit higher amounts of energy to areas of the vehicle away from the area of contact. In comparison, the rubber bumper reduces the energy transmissibility to other components away from the area of contact because of its elastomeric properties, but does not improve durability greatly because of poor resistance to abrasion. Even in configurations where both metal and rubber are combined in a layered bumper configuration, they are utilized in a rigid configuration where neither layer is permitted to move relative to the vehicle frame and/or each other. This rigid design limits the function of the layered configuration to a single function, either durability or reduced energy transmissibility.
What is needed is a laminate bumper configuration that provides both the features of durability and reduced energy transmissibility.
The present invention overcomes the drawbacks of the previous bumpers used on material handling vehicles by providing a bumper that provides both durability and reduced energy transmissibility. Embodiments of the invention include a laminate bumper that includes at least a first bumper layer and a second bumper layer, such that at least one of the first bumper layer and second bumper layer of the laminate bumper configuration are allowed to translate upon vehicle contact with an object.
Consistent with the above comments, at least some embodiments include a bumper for a material handling vehicle. The bumper comprises a lug secured to a frame of the material handling vehicle. A first bumper layer and a second bumper layer can be included, the first bumper layer and the second bumper layer movably secured to the frame to form a vehicle bumper, with at least one of the first bumper layer and the second bumper layer including a slot for the lug to extend through. And, at least one of the first bumper layer and the second bumper layer is allowed to translate relative to the frame upon the vehicle bumper contact with an object to reduce energy transmissibility through the frame.
Other embodiments include a laminate bumper for a material handling vehicle. The laminate bumper comprises a lug secured to a frame of the material handling vehicle. A first bumper layer and a second bumper layer can be included, the first bumper layer and the second bumper layer positioned relative to the frame to form a bumper, such that at least one of the first bumper layer and the second bumper layer is allowed to translate upon the bumper contact with an object to reduce energy transmissibility through the frame.
Yet other embodiments include a material handling vehicle. The vehicle comprises a frame, and a vertically movable platform mounted relative to the frame, the platform being vertically movable between an upper position and a lower position. A lug can be secured to the frame, the lug to position a first bumper layer and a second bumper layer relative to the frame to form a bumper. The first bumper layer and the second bumper layer are movably secured to the frame by the lug, such that at least one of the first bumper layer and the second bumper layer is allowed to translate a predefined amount upon the bumper contact with an object to reduce energy transmissibility through the frame.
The foregoing and other objects and advantages of the invention will appear in the detailed description which follows. In the description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which illustrate preferred embodiments.
The invention may be embodied in several forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The scope of the invention is defined in the appended claims, rather than in the specific description preceding them. All embodiments that fall within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are therefore intended to be embraced by the claims.
The various aspects of the invention will be described in connection with an improved dynamic laminate bumper configuration for a material handling vehicle. That is because the features and advantages that arise due to embodiments of the invention are well suited to this purpose. Still, it should be appreciated that the various aspects of the invention can be applied to achieve other objectives as well.
Embodiments of the invention described herein, either alone or in combination, are well suited to provide a dynamic laminate bumper configuration. The laminate bumper configuration achieves improved durability and reduced energy transmissibility through allowing one or more of the layers of the bumper to translate a predefined amount upon bumper contact with an object.
Referring now to the Figures, and more particularly to
It is to be appreciated that material handling vehicles are designed in a variety of configurations to perform a variety of tasks. Although the vehicle 50 is shown by way of example as a hand/rider truck, it will be apparent to those of skill in the art that the present invention is not limited to vehicles of this type, and can also be provided in various other types of material handling and lift vehicle configurations, including for example, pallet trucks, stacker trucks, and fore-aft stance operator configuration lift trucks. The bumper configurations are suitable for both driver controlled, pedestrian controlled and remotely controlled material handling vehicles.
As seen more particularly in
The dynamic bumper 90 allows the multi-layers to reduce the transmissibility of energy to other components of the vehicle and to improve the vehicle's durability. The multi-layers provide an envelope of materials that function together and help to reduce the transmissive loads seen by other components of the vehicle 50. The dynamic bumper 90 serves to improve the durability of the vehicle without introducing additional stresses away from the area of contact. Embodiments of the invention provide both rigidity and reduced energy transmissibility.
As seen in
The dynamic translation properties of the dynamic bumper 90 may be achieved with the use of a dynamic fastener arrangement, such as a plurality of lugs 96 and predefined slots 98. In the embodiment shown, a shoulder bolt 96 is used, although other known mechanical configurations may be used, e.g., pins or rods. Each shoulder bolt 96 can be mated or situated within the predefined slots 98 in one or more of the laminated materials, i.e., in the rubber layer 92 and/or the metal layer 94, in the two-layered configuration. In some embodiments, the slots 98 are horizontal, although other orientations are also considered. The size and orientation of the predefined slots in the metal layer 94 are an important factor to the dynamic translation of the bumper 90. It is to be appreciated that the size and orientation may vary depending on the particular application. The bolts 96 may be biased in the horizontal slots 98, allowing translation when contact forces are applied to the laminated layers 92 and 94. The shoulder bolts 96 may also apply a low clamp force on the laminated materials 92 and 94. The laminate materials 92 and/or 94 may be retained by the low clamp force applied from the shoulder bolts 96 and the elastic characteristics of the rubber layer 92, for example.
As seen in
As can be seen in
As can be seen in
As seen in
As seen in
In some embodiments, the dynamic bumper 90 may incorporate an adhesive or other bonding material in place of or in combination with the bolt 96 and slot 98 configuration to laminate the materials 92 and 94, and to bond them to the vehicle frame 116 and/or each other.
In the dynamic bumper described above, testing showed that transmissibility can be reduced at least by about 4.5 percent to about 25 percent measured from the vehicle frame and vehicle bulkhead. During testing, the dynamic bumper 90 deformed approximately 65 percent less than a known static bumper configuration.
Referring to
The foregoing has been a detailed description of illustrative embodiments of the invention. Various modifications and additions can be made without departing from the spirit and scope thereof. Furthermore, since numerous modifications and changes will readily occur to those skilled in the art, it is not desired to limit the invention to the exact construction and operation shown and described. For example, any of the various features described herein can be combined with some or all of the other features described herein according to alternate embodiments. While the preferred embodiment has been described, the details may be changed without departing from the invention, which is defined by the claims.
Finally, it is expressly contemplated that any of the processes or steps described herein may be combined, eliminated, or reordered. Accordingly, this description is meant to be taken only by way of example, and not to otherwise limit the scope of this invention.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/595,490, filed Feb. 6, 2012, and entitled “Laminate Bumper For Material Handling Vehicles,” which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1407637 | Coletta | Feb 1922 | A |
1783875 | Ferdinand | Dec 1930 | A |
2954256 | Barényi | Sep 1960 | A |
3014710 | Layne | Dec 1961 | A |
3610609 | Sobel | Oct 1971 | A |
3706468 | Yoviene | Dec 1972 | A |
3784182 | Sobel | Jan 1974 | A |
3877741 | Wilfert et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3927907 | Bialek | Dec 1975 | A |
4014582 | MacKenzie | Mar 1977 | A |
4085956 | Weisshappel et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4235467 | Gardou | Nov 1980 | A |
4533166 | Stokes | Aug 1985 | A |
4592580 | Stanganelli et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
5031947 | Chen | Jul 1991 | A |
5335951 | Neri et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5516169 | Falk et al. | May 1996 | A |
5524916 | Redens | Jun 1996 | A |
5971451 | Huang | Oct 1999 | A |
6217090 | Berzinji | Apr 2001 | B1 |
8408613 | Tanton | Apr 2013 | B1 |
20130200638 | Lutz et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130200638 A1 | Aug 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61595490 | Feb 2012 | US |