The present invention relates to a method for producing a laminate which is used in container closure systems.
It is commonplace in the packaging of a wide variety of materials ranging from pharmaceutical products to instant coffee that a closure is provided in the form of a seal connected to the neck of a container and a screw cap covering and protecting the seal which provides a re-closable cap after the seal has been removed to gain access to the container. Often the closure is designed such that the underside of the seal has a heat sensitive adhesive coating or a meltable plastics layer covered by a metal foil. The seal is placed against the neck of a container and sandwiched against it by the applied screw cap. Upon induction heating, the metal foil is heated which activates the heat sensitive adhesive layer or melts the plastic layer so that on cooling, the seal bonds to the neck of the container.
A problem encountered with such seals is a difficulty in removing the seals from containers. In this regard, this has been overcome by including a tab extending sideways from the neck of the container which may be gripped by the consumer to facilitate removal of the seal. An example of such a system is the so called “Top Tab” structure which is described fully in U.S. Pat. No. 4,961,986. This system includes a multilayer substrate which is partly delaminated to provide a tab lying usually within the circumference of the container neck. In U.S. Pat. No. 4,961,986 this is achieved by forming the substrate from multiple layers which are adhered together across only a part of their extent. U.S. Pat. No. 4,961,986 further describes that the screw cap may include some form of liner in addition to the seal material. In such a two component system, wherein the seal and liner are provided separately, is that the two components have to be fitted in two separate operations.
As this is expensive and increases the complexity of the fitting process, there has been a focus on the development of a one component seal and liner system which avoids the need for two separate fitting operations. For example, EP-A-1472153 describes a one component seal and liner system, for attaching into a screw cap, which includes a tab. In the product detailed, the seal portion of the system is adhered to the liner portion by means of a release layer such that the seal and liner release from each other with a peel strength in the range from 20 to 90 g at a rate of 1500 mm/min on a sample strip 25 mm wide.
A further tab system is the successful “Lift “n” Peel”® commercial system. This can be comprised of a primary seal and a secondary liner or just a primary seal and is usually just a primary seal. The tab is formed by interposing a layer of polyethylene terephthalate into the primary seal which extends only over a portion of the surface area of the liner. The layer of polyethylene terephthalate is interposed between the foam layer and top EVA/PET layer. On heating, the EVA adheres to the interposed layer, and portion of foam still exposed and thus by virtue of the interposed plastics layer a tab, lying wholly within the boundaries of the liner, is formed.
In WO 97/02997, a method for including a tab in a primary seal laminate is disclosed. In this case three feeds are passed to a chill roll in contact with a nip roll. The first feed which will form the top layer of the primary seal laminate, is an ethylene-vinyl alcohol barrier layer sandwiched between two polypropylene layers. The second feed is a deadening member which may be PET and the third feed is extruded tabstock e.g. polypropylene, which forms a layer across the entire width of the laminate forming the top layer. All three feeds come into contact at the point where the chill roll and nip roll are in contact. The chill roll quenches the extruded tabstock maximising its amorphous properties and causes lamination of all three layers.
A problem which can be identified with such systems is that in attaching the system including the tab to a container to be sealed, an uneven level of bonding to the container is achieved with there being a propensity for stronger bonds to be formed under the tabbed portion of the liner as compared to the non-tabbed portion. There is a further danger that on heating a metal foil of an induction system, the top layer of the seal may burn where the heat transferred to this layer is too great.
A further problem encountered with such seals is that when used on containers which are to be stored at low temperatures, for example, in dairy applications, after storage at such temperatures, the bond between the seal substrate and tab has a tendency to fail. This means that when the seal is removed from the container on opening, because the bond fails, the tab comes away from the seal substrate leaving the seal substrate adhered to the container rather than removing the seal substrate from the container.
It is therefore clear that there is a need for a simple and cost effective method for including a tabstock in a primary seal laminate which solves the problems of requiring producing an effective tab and achieving an even level of bonding to the container to be sealed.
In this regard, the present invention provides a method for producing a primary laminate including a tabstock comprising the steps of:
(a) feeding a seal laminate including a hot melt adhesive layer, a foil layer and a top foam layer to a laminating station;
(b) continuously feeding a tabstock, which is narrower than the seal laminate, towards the laminating station such that the bottom of the tabstock and the top foam layer of the seal laminate come into non-adhesive contact to form a primary substrate, the top face of which is partly comprised of the top face of the tabstock and partly comprised of the top foam layer of the seal laminate prior to reaching the laminating station;
(c) continuously feeding a plastic film stock which has top and bottom surfaces to the laminating station so the bottom surface of the plastic film stock is in contact with the top face of the primary substrate and
(d) continuously extruding a polymeric adhesive which is a copolymer of ethylene and an alkyl(alk)acrylate having a melt flow index 1 to 10 dg/min (190° C., 2.16 kg) between the top face of the primary substrate and bottom surface of the plastic film stock such that the two are adhered together.
The bond strength between the top foam layer and the plastic film stock is preferably greater than 15N/12.5 mm at 330 mm/min when the laminating plastic film and tabstock is pulled at 90° to the longitudinal edge of the tabstock from the seal laminate with a separation angle of 180°. In the present specification reference to upper and lower surfaces of components refers to the orientation of the components in the seal formed from the laminate when the seal is in use on a container in the upright position.
The apparatus required for the method of the present invention must have separate unwind stations for the laminate feeds that are arranged to enable simultaneous unwinding. The laminate feeds are fed to a lamination station comprising a nip between two rollers. At this point the feeds are adhered to each other to produce the primary laminate including a tabstock. The adhesive is applied vertically downwards as a curtain into the nip where the feed rollers are in contact. The speed of the feed rollers which form the nip should be faster than the rate of application of adhesive to avoid build up of the molten adhesive in the nip which might result in an uneven coating. The adhesive is applied directly from the die head of an extruder.
The top layer of the seal laminate is a foam layer. It has been found that the inclusion of a foam layer is important in order to ensure that an even seal to the container ultimately to be sealed is achieved. More specifically, this foam layer has a cushioning effect such that there is an equalisation of the pressure that is exerted around the circumference of a vessel closing assembly cut from the laminate in the cap fitted on to a container as induction heating takes place to adhere the liner to the neck of the container. Thus the difference in thickness of the non-tabbed portion as compared to the tabbed portion, does not result in a difference in the strength of the bond formed under these portions. That is to say that a substantially uniform bond strength between the laminate and neck of the container is obtained around the whole circumference. The foam layer also serves the purpose of providing integrity and stiffness to the structure.
The foam may comprise several layers e.g. of coextruded materials having surface layers selected for compatibility with adjacent surfaces. The foam is preferably formed of lower alkene polymers and copolymers, preferably of ethylene and/or propylene. Foam formed from blended polymers may be used. Each of several layers may be formed of the same polymers, blended in different ratios. The foam layer may be a voided material formed by stretching polymer containing particulate material. The polymer may in these voided films, comprise polypropylene. Preferably the film is formed by including foaming agents such as dissolved gases, volatile compounds or chemically reactive compounds.
Preferably the foam layer is a pure foam and is comprised of medium or high density polyethylene (MDPE or HDPE). In order to avoid potential oozing of the extruded polymeric adhesive through the structure, it is preferred that the foam has a closed cell structure. In a preferred embodiment, the foam layer is formed from a high density foam. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the foam has a density in the range from 0.5 to 0.8 g/ml preferably in the range 0.55 to 0.75 g/ml, most preferably in the range 0.6 to 0.7 g/ml.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the foam layer has a thickness in the range from 75 to 300 μm. In order to be suitable for a seal as described herein, the foam layer needs to exhibit a reasonable degree of flexibility.
The key issue with regards to the foam is the PE make up. If the proportion of LDPE is too great then the melting point as determined by DSC will be too low. This will lead to the foam melting on induction sealing, thus leaving a ring of exposed aluminium around the circumference of the seal. The melting point of the preferred foam is 129° C., and the melting point is preferably at least 120° C., more preferably at least 125° C., for instance at least 128° C.
The foil and hot melt adhesive layer of the seal laminate are conventional for induction sealing systems. The hot melt adhesive is suitable to form an adhesive seal to a food or beverage (i.e. comestible) container, for instance having a peel strength between 3 and 6N when peeling the liner from the container at 45° at room temperature.
It is preferable that one of the components of the primary laminate is printed. This can be achieved in one of two ways. The tab which forms a part of the primary laminate or the plastic film stock may include a printed layer.
As noted above, an essential feature of the primary laminate produced by the method of the present invention is the inclusion of a tabstock so that the seal will have a free tab. In the primary seal laminate produced, while the relative dimensions of the tab are not limited, it may be preferable that, for example the tab lies wholly within the circumference of the container neck and typically the tab occupies about 50% of the seal area, where the primary laminate has a diameter of less than 36 mm. The tab stock may be 10-100 mm wide, for instance 15 to 45 mm wide. The tab is provided by adhering a tab stock to the top polyester layer of the heat sealable laminate. The tabstock which is fed to the laminating station as detailed in step (b) is narrower in width than the heat sealable laminate.
Preferably the tabstock is formed of a polyester, more preferably polyethylene terephthalate. In one embodiment of the present invention, the bottom surface of the tabstock which is ultimately in contact with the top foam layer of the heat sealable laminate may be coated with a release material, for example, silicone. This minimised the possibility that during the extrusion when the finished primary seal laminate is adhered to a container by induction heat sealing, of the tabstock sticking to the top foam layer. Such release coatings are not typically necessary, however the tabstock may further include a coloured or printed layer formed of polyester and attached to the top surface of the other polyester layer by an adhesive tie layer.
In step (b), in one embodiment of the present invention, rather than feeding a single tabstock, the feed may comprise a plurality of narrow tabstocks arranged across the machine at regularly spaced apart intervals. In this way, a wide sheet of primary laminate including a tabstock may be formed which can then be slit as required (in line or in subsequent operations) thus improving the efficiency of the system.
As detailed in step (c), the third feed which is fed to the laminating station is a plastic film stock. Preferably the plastic film is selected from the group consisting of polyester, preferably polyethylene terepthalate, polyamide, polypropylene or a composite. Most preferably the plastic film is polyethylene terephthalate. The width of this stock is the same as or a little narrower than the width of the heat sealable laminate. The curtain of adhesive will extend beyond the edge of the plastic filmstock, and the edge portion which forms a thicker bead is collected on the foam side of the seal laminate for trimming and removal, minimising waste of expensive PET.
This plastic film layer is preferably transparent in order that the printing of the lower layers is visible to the end user. Preferably the thickness of the plastic film stock is at least 20 μm. More preferably the thickness of the plastic film stock is in the range from 20-40 μm. In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, where the plastic film stock is PET preferably it has a surface layer with improved adhesive properties for instance formed by coextrusion. Preferably the plastic film stock is corona treated on the surface which ends up as the lowermost surface in the product, this treatment taking place upstream of the laminating station. This is done in order to ensure that the bond formed to the polymeric adhesive in step (d) is sufficiently strong Examples of suitable PET stock materials include Lumirror 10.47 which is a film that is coextruded on one side and is commercially available from Toray.
Prior to reaching the laminating station, the bottom face of the tabstock and the top foam layer of the seal laminate are brought into contact. There is no adhesion between the two feeds. The two feeds are fed in contact with one another to the laminating station. In order to achieve this, the two feeds must approach the laminating station from the same side relative to the extruder. The combination of the seal laminate and tabstock in contact with each other is referred to as a primary substrate as they are passed to the laminating station together. As the tabstock is necessarily narrower in width than the seal laminate, the top face of the primary substrate presented to the laminating station is formed partly of the top face of the tabstock and partly of the top foam layer of the seal laminate.
In the laminating station, the primary substrate is brought into contact with the plastic film stock which is fed simultaneously to the laminating station but from the opposite side of the curtain of adhesive. At the point where the top face of the primary substrate is in contact with the bottom surface of the plastic film stock, the polymeric adhesive is continuously extruded between the two surfaces. The result is that the plastic film stock is adhered over the entire surface area of the top face of the primary substrate. This means that over part of the width, the plastic stock will be adhered to the top foam layer of the seal laminate and over the remaining width, the plastic film stock will be adhered to the top face of the tabstock. This means that in a preferred embodiment where the primary laminate is cut, the result is then that a tab portion is formed which lies wholly within the circumference of the seal.
The bond formed between the top foam layer of the seal laminate and the plastic film stock must have a strength greater than 15N/12.5 mm at 330 mm/min when the tab formed of tabstock and plastic film stock is pulled from the seal laminate at 90° to the longitudinal edge of the tab (which is the machine direction of the manufacturing apparatus) with an angle of separation of from the seal laminate 180°. This is in order to ensure that when using the tab to remove the seal from a container, the tab plastic film remains adhered to the primary laminate upon application of a pulling force to the tab.
The peel test is suitably carried out using a Hounsfield Tensile Tester. Each test is carried out on three samples. The samples are cut from a strip 12.5 mm wide taken across the laminate. The sample should be at least the length of the gap between two strips of tabstock. One end of the sample should be cut through the tabstock close to one longitudinal edge, allowing the tab comprising tabstock and plastic film stock to be separated from the seal laminate. The tabstock is mounted in one jaw of the Tensile Tester, with the seal laminate being fixed into the other jaw. The jaws separate at an angle of 180°. A 50N load cell is utilised for the test. The apparatus is set so as to allow an extension of at least 25 mm, with a speed of 330 mm per minute.
The results recorded include the “break-in force”, the force required to overcome the initial resistance to tab de-lamination. Subsequently the “running force” is measured, that is the force required to continue to separate the tab from the seal laminate. The running force is generally substantially constant. For the present product, the break-in force is the more important, since provided this is higher than the force required to peel the seal from the top of the container to which it is attached, the tab/plastic film will remain adhered to the seal as peeling starts, the force needed to continue this peeling being lower as the seal is peeled from the container.
The peel test is illustrated schematically in
Much research has gone into selecting a polymeric adhesive which can be extruded as described in the present method but does not suffer from the problem of the bond formed becoming brittle when stored at low temperatures. Additionally, the adhesive needs to be one that has a sufficiently high surface energy to adhere to plastics materials such as PET but which will not damage the metallic rollers used. In this regard, the present applicant has found that surprisingly, these problems can be overcome by selecting a polymeric adhesive which has a melt flow index in the range 1 to 10 dg/min, preferably less than 5 dg/min (190° C., 2.16 kg by ASTM D1328). The adhesive should be extrudable at temperatures low enough to avoid damage (be melting) to the foam layer, but which have high enough peel strengths at low storage temperatures and at room temperature to avoid delamination of the seal during removal from the sealed container using the adhered tab. Materials with melt points (ASTM D3418) in the range 70 to 100° C. and densities in the range 0.920 to 0.955 g/cm3, for instance around 0.940-0.945 g/cm3, are suitable. Copolymers of ethylene with C1-12 alkyl (alk) acrylate esters (e.g. acrylate or methacrylate esters), especially C1-4 alkyl esters, preferably of acrylic acid, especially butyl acrylate or methyl acrylate, may be used. The copolymers are random copolymers, for instance with mole proportions of acrylate of 0.5 to 25%, especially in the range 1 to 20%.
Suitable copolymers are available in the series 2200 Bynel range by DuPont. Others having a higher melt index which may be suitable for laminates which will not be used at temperatures below freezing are the Lotryl MA series. Preferably the polymeric adhesive has a melt flow index of about 2 dg/min (190° C., 2.16 kg). A particularly preferred polymeric adhesive is an ethylene methylacrylate copolymer which has a melt flow index value of approximately 2 dg/min, sold as Bynel 22E780.
In the process of the present invention, in step (d), the polymeric adhesive is extruded through a die head. The die head is preferably at a temperature in the range from 300 to 330° C. The height of the die head from the nip is preferably in the range from 10 to 30 cm, more preferably in the range 15 to 25 cm, e.g. approximately 20 cm. The width of the slot is about 0.5-1.0 mm. The speed of the nip rollers at the laminating station is preferably in the range from 20 to 100 m/min, more preferably 50 to 80 m/min. In order that the rollers can deal with a feed which has an uneven surface due to the regions where a tab is present and the regions where a tab is not present, it is preferable that the feed rollers have a shore A hardness around 70-90, for instance a Teflon coated roller pressing against a metal chill roller.
After extrusion of the polymeric adhesive, pressure is applied to the primary laminate by chilled nip rollers downstream of the laminating station to facilitate adhesion. The chilled nip rollers are preferably at a temperature of about 23° C.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the coat weight of the adhesive layer is in the range from 25 to 45 gm−2.
In order that any printing on the tabstock can be seen, preferably the polymeric adhesive is transparent.
In a further aspect of the present invention, the primary laminate including a tabstock maybe subsequently wound onto a final roll optionally after slitting. Alternatively slitting may be carried out in a separate step, e.g. in a separate location.
The seal stock laminate of the present invention is generally formed in wide strips. Therefore in order to form the tabs, it is necessary to cut the wide strips of seal stock laminate into narrower strips. These narrower strips can then be punched or cut to form a seal ready to be applied to a container. The slitting of the wide strips into narrower strips needs to be done with precision in order to ensure that the cuts are made at the correct positions to produce the tabs. The seal can then be punched from the narrower strips from the slitting step and fixed inside the top of a screw cap. This may be carried out in a procedure and/or location separate to the method of making the seal stock laminate. The container to which the seal is attached may be made of glass or plastic material such as polyethylene, polyester, polyvinyl chloride, polypropylene or acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene polymer.
A screw cap equipped with a seal as described above may be screwed on to the open neck of a container thus sandwiching the seal between the open neck of the container and the top of the cap. The seal is then adhered via the hot melt adhesive on the lower surface of the laminate to the open neck of the container by induction heating.
As has been described above, one of the aims of the present invention is to provide a primary laminate including a tab which produces a seal that can still be effective even after prolonged storage of the laminate at low temperatures. In this regard, the present applicant has developed a rigorous test for determining whether a given seal is likely to fail at low temperatures. The primary laminate including a tabstock as produced by the method according to the present invention is cut into three sample discs to be attached to the neck of a container. Samples were taken from three different positions on the laminate, specifically the left hand side, middle and right hand sides. Two different types of container are tested, the first being a 1 liter polyethylene chimney type bottle used in dairy applications and the second being a polyester 150 ml so-called ‘round packer’ bottle. The samples discs were sealed to the neck of these containers using the sealing head and conditions as shown in the table below: In the meantime, a metal plate was set up on the base of a freezer and its temperature monitored by use of a calibrated thermometer fitted with a magnetic thermocouple.
The samples were allowed to cool for at least 2 minutes after sealing. The caps were then removed and the bottles were placed upside down in the freezer in direct contact with the metal plates on the base of the freezer. The sample was allowed to stand for a minimum of 2 minutes. The seals were then removed from the necks of the bottles while still in the freezer. Where the whole of the seal could be removed from the neck of the container without any delamination of the top plastics film stock from the adhesive, a positive result is noted. A sample fails where the plastic layer delaminates from the foam, which can be observed as surface of the top plastic film layer is completely transparent rather than having foam still adhered to it. Where a sample fails it is tested again the following day. If the problem still persists, the sample is rejected.
One advantage of seals produced by the method of the present invention is that they can be used universally for sealing containers of comestibles requiring storage at low or high temperatures, even down to as low as −30° C. or as high as 30° C. The invention is of particular utility where the storage temperature is in the range 0 to 6° C.
An embodiment of the invention will now be described with reference to the following figures, in which:
A seal laminate (1) comprising heat sealable (hot-melt) layer (4) for adhesion to a container to be sealed, a foil layer (5) and a top layer of polyethylene foam (7) is obtained commercially from Isco Jacques Schindler. This seal laminate is rolled onto a first feed roll (13) in the laminating apparatus.
The second feed roll (14) in the laminating apparatus is the source of the tabstock, which in this case, is a layer of polyethylene terephthalate (8). The width of the layer of polyethylene terephthalate (8) is in the range from 25-60 mm.
A third feed roll (15) is loaded with the plastics film stock, in this case a PET stock (10) which can be obtained commercially from Toray, Europe. The thickness of the PET stock (10) is in the range from 23-36 μm. The PET stock (10) used is a co-extruded PET material available as Lumirror 10.47 from Toray. The coextruded surface layer ensures optimal adhesion to the adjacent foam layer of the seal laminate.
The seal laminate (1), tabstock (8) and PET stock (10) are simultaneously fed to the laminating station (6) where an extruder (17) is positioned vertically above the nip between rollers (18 and 19). Prior to reaching the laminating station (6), the seal laminate (1) and tabstock (8) are brought into contact to form a primary substrate (1a).
Ethylene methyl acrylate copolymer (9) with a melt flow index of 2 dg/min (190° C., 2.16 kg (ASTM D1238)) is then extruded continuously as a curtain from the extruder (17) between the top face of the primary laminate (1a) and the bottom face of the PET stock (10). The height of the die head above the nip was about 20 cm. The extrusion conditions i.e. the weight of adhesive being extruded, its, speed and extruder head temperature, were such that a temperature of greater than about 200° C., for instance as much as about 250° C. is attained at the nip for adhesion. Roller 18 is a chilled stainless steel roller, while roller 19 has a Teflon coated surface with Shore A hardness of 75. The rollers (18) and (19) are moving at a speed of 70 m/min relative to the speed of application of the adhesive, the pressure between them selected to avoid the curtain creasing at the nip. The bottom face of the PET stock (10) and the resulting primary laminate (1b) including a tabstock is passed with the bottom face of the PET stock in contact with a chill roller (18) at a temperature of about 23° C. to be rolled on to a final product roll (32). This process is illustrated schematically in
The break-in peel strength was measured as explained above and illustrated in
The coat weight was determined as follows: a 0.5 m to 1 m length of paper backed polyester which has a width of 1 m was passed to the laminating station between primary substrate 1a and resin 9. A curtain of the ethylene methyl acrylate copolymer was then extruded continuously between the top polyester face of the paper backed polyester and the bottom face of the PET stock (10) under the run conditions of the line. Several 10×10 cm samples were then cut across the width of the web and their weight in g was recorded. The weight of the paper backed polyester and PET stock (10) were subtracted from this figure and the result was multiplied by 100 to give a coat weight in gm−2.
The seal stock laminate was then cut into narrow strips. From these strips, circular discs were punched to form discs of the seal stock laminate (16) i.e. seals. The seals are fixed inside screw caps. The screw cap equipped with the seal is then screwed onto the open neck of the bottle 24. The cap and bottle are then subjected to an induction heating step in which the foil is heated around its periphery by the generation of eddy currents within it, which, in turn, melts the heat sealable layer (4) to bond the seal to the open neck of the bottle.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
06126645.8 | Dec 2006 | GB | national |
This application is a divisional of prior application Ser. No. 12/519,887, which is a U.S. national phase application filed under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of International Application PCT/US2007/087520, filed on Dec. 14, 2007, which claims priority from European Application 06126645.8, filed Dec 20, 2006, which are all hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3620898 | Harris et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3938686 | Milligan et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
4133796 | Bullman | Jan 1979 | A |
4206165 | Dukess | Jun 1980 | A |
4416937 | Metzger | Nov 1983 | A |
4452842 | Borges et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4582735 | Smith | Apr 1986 | A |
4679519 | Linville | Jul 1987 | A |
4741791 | Howard et al. | May 1988 | A |
4801647 | Wolfe, Jr. | Jan 1989 | A |
4837061 | Smits et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4892209 | Dorfman et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4934544 | Han et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4960216 | Giles et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4961986 | Galda et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5004111 | McCarthy | Apr 1991 | A |
5015318 | Smits et al. | May 1991 | A |
5055150 | Rosenfeld et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5057365 | Finkelstein et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5071710 | Smits et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5098495 | Smits et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5149386 | Smits et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5178967 | Rosenfeld et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5197618 | Goth | Mar 1993 | A |
5265745 | Pereyra et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5319475 | Kay et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5514434 | Loefgren | May 1996 | A |
5514442 | Galda et al. | May 1996 | A |
5514470 | Haffner et al. | May 1996 | A |
5543233 | Latiolais et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5598940 | Finkelstein et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5601200 | Finkelstein et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5615789 | Finkelstein et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5669521 | Wiening et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5702015 | Giles et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5709310 | Kretz | Jan 1998 | A |
5726283 | Tsai et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5975304 | Cain et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6027776 | Mueller | Feb 2000 | A |
6082566 | Yousif et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6131754 | Smelko | Oct 2000 | A |
6139931 | Finkelstein et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6194042 | Finkelstein et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6264098 | Drummond et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6277478 | Kurita et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6312776 | Finkelstein et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6378715 | Finkelstein et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6458302 | Shifflet | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6602309 | Vizulis et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6659507 | Banahan | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6699566 | Zeiter et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6705467 | Kancsar et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6722272 | Jud | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6767425 | Meier | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6866926 | Smelko et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6902075 | O'Brien et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6916516 | Gerber et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6946177 | Abe et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6955736 | Rosenberger et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6960392 | Le Du et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6974045 | Trombach et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7012032 | Cosentino et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7128210 | Razeti et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7182475 | Kramer et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
RE39790 | Fuchs et al. | Aug 2007 | E |
7316760 | Nageli | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7448153 | Maliner et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7531228 | Perre et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7713605 | Yousif et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7740927 | Yousif et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7819266 | Ross et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7838109 | Declerck | Nov 2010 | B2 |
20020068140 | Finkelstein et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020193820 | Wakuda et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030186047 | Trouilhet | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030196418 | O'Brien et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040109963 | Zaggia et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050048307 | Schubert et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050208242 | Smelko et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060000545 | Nageli et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060003120 | Nageli et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060003122 | Nageli et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060151415 | Smelko et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070298273 | Thies et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080026171 | Gullick et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080103262 | Haschke | May 2008 | A1 |
20080156443 | Schaefer et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080233339 | Thorstensen-Woll | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090078671 | Triquet et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090142530 | Visioli et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090208729 | Allegaert et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100009162 | Rothweiler | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100028668 | Janda et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100030180 | Declerck | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100059942 | Rothweiler | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100116410 | Yousif | May 2010 | A1 |
20100155288 | Harper et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100170820 | Leplatois et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100213193 | Helmlinger et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100221483 | Gonzalez Carro et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100290663 | Trassl et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100314278 | Fonteyne et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110000917 | Wolters et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110005961 | Leplatois et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110091715 | Rakutt et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20120111758 | Lo | May 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
501 393 | Aug 2006 | AT |
11 738 | Apr 2011 | AT |
8200231 | Sep 2003 | BR |
0300992 | Nov 2004 | BR |
91 08 868.2 | Jul 1991 | DE |
691 19 934 | Dec 1996 | DE |
102 04 281 | Aug 2003 | DE |
10 2006 030 118 | May 2007 | DE |
10 2007 022 935 | Apr 2009 | DE |
20 2009 000 245 | Apr 2009 | DE |
0 518 411 | Dec 1992 | EP |
0 668 221 | Aug 1995 | EP |
0 444 865 | Jun 1996 | EP |
0 826 598 | Mar 1998 | EP |
0 826 599 | Mar 1998 | EP |
0 717 710 | Apr 1999 | EP |
0 915 026 | May 1999 | EP |
0 706 473 | Aug 1999 | EP |
0 803 445 | Nov 2003 | EP |
1075921 | Sep 2006 | EP |
1 834 893 | Sep 2007 | EP |
1 837 288 | Sep 2007 | EP |
1 839 898 | Oct 2007 | EP |
1 839 899 | Oct 2007 | EP |
1 857 275 | Nov 2007 | EP |
1 873 078 | Jan 2008 | EP |
1 445 209 | May 2008 | EP |
1 918 094 | May 2008 | EP |
1 472 153 | Jun 2008 | EP |
1 935 636 | Jun 2008 | EP |
1 968 020 | Sep 2008 | EP |
1 992 476 | Nov 2008 | EP |
2 014 461 | Jan 2009 | EP |
2 230 190 | Sep 2010 | EP |
2 292 524 | Mar 2011 | EP |
2 916 157 | Nov 2008 | FR |
2 943 322 | Sep 2010 | FR |
04-173135 | Jun 1992 | JP |
2000-255621 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2004-315035 | Nov 2004 | JP |
10-0711073 | Apr 2007 | KR |
10-0840926 | Jun 2008 | KR |
10-0886955 | Mar 2009 | KR |
PA05002905 | Feb 2006 | MX |
2010001867 | Apr 2010 | MX |
194965 | Nov 1992 | TW |
8902402 | Mar 1989 | WO |
9702997 | Jan 1997 | WO |
0066450 | Nov 2000 | WO |
03066465 | Aug 2003 | WO |
2006018556 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2006021291 | Mar 2006 | WO |
2006099260 | Sep 2006 | WO |
2006108853 | Oct 2006 | WO |
2007109113 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2008027029 | Mar 2008 | WO |
2008027036 | Mar 2008 | WO |
2008039350 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2008125784 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2008125785 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2008148176 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2009092066 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2010115811 | Oct 2010 | WO |
2011039067 | Apr 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Properties of DuPont Bynel 2174. |
European Patent Office Extended European Search Report for European Patent Application 06126645.8 dated May 7, 2007 (5 pages). |
International Searching Authority International Search Report for International Application PCT/US2007/087520 dated Apr. 17, 2008 (2 pages). |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application PCT/US2007/087520 dated Apr. 17, 2008 (4 pages). |
The International Bureau of WIPO International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2007/087520 dated Jun. 23, 2009 (5 pages). |
Notice of Opposition to European Patent 1 935 636 B1 by Alfelder Kunststoffwerke Herm. Meyer GmbH dated Aug. 23, 2012 (21 pages), with English translation (18 pages). |
Selig Sealing Products, Inc. Response to Notice of Opposition to European Patent 1 935 636 B1 by Alfelder Kunststoffwerke Herm. Meyer GmbH dated Feb. 5, 2013 (11 pages). |
Jun. 28, 2013 Letter from Einsel & Kollegen to EPO in opposition for EP 1 935 636 B1. (German language letter with attached English translation). |
Annex to the communication-opposition for corresponding European Application No. 1935636, 3 pages. |
Decision of the Opposition Division and Instruction for corresponding European Application No. 1935636, 1 page. |
Druckexemplar in opposition procedure for corresponding European Application No. 1935636, 14 pages. |
Grounds for the decision (Annex)—opposition for corresponding European Application No. 1935636, 10 pages. |
Interlocutory decision in oppistion proceedings for corresponding European Application No. 1935636, 2 pages. |
Minutes of the oral proceedings (Opposition Division)—conclusion of the proceedings for corresponding European Application No. 1935636, 1 page. |
Minutes of the oral proceedings (Opposition Division)—conclusion of the proceedings for corresponding European Application No. 1935636, 2 pages. |
Minutes of the oral proceedings (Opposition Division)—introduction of the parties conclusion of the proceedings for corresponding European Application No. 1935636, 2 pages. |
Scanned annex to a communication—opposition procedure for corresponding European Application No. 1935636, 6 pages. |
Information about the result of oral proceedings for corresponding European Application No. 1935636, 7 pages. |
Amended claims with annotations for corresponding European Application No. 1935636, 3 pages. |
Citation in opposition procedure for corresponding European Application No. 1935636, 22 pages. |
Claims for corresponding European Application No. 1935636, 3 pages. |
Claims for corresponding European Application No. 1935636, 1 page. |
Letter regarding the opposition procedure (no time limit) for corresponding European Application No. 1935636, 2 pages. |
Non-patent literature cited during the opposition procedure for corresponding European Application No. 1935636, 4 pages. |
Non-patent literature cited during the opposition procedure for corresponding European Application No. 1935636, 2 pages. |
Annex to the communication—opposition for corresponding European Application No. 1935636, 10 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120043330 A1 | Feb 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12519887 | US | |
Child | 13284526 | US |