The present invention relates to a lamp and a vehicle headlight.
Specifically, a lamp of the discharge type comprises
a discharge vessel with electrodes arranged at a distance in a longitudinal direction for creating an arc discharge,
and a reflective barrier at least partly surrounding said discharge vessel for reflecting light emitted from said arc discharge, where at least a part of said reflective barrier is arranged in said longitudinal direction between said electrodes.
A lamp of this type is known from U.S. Pat. No. 6,445,129. Here, a gaseous-discharge lamp, in particular for motor vehicle headlamps is described. The discharge vessel is made of glass or the like. Two electrodes extend into the discharge vessel and form an arc gap. The discharge vessel is shown to have elliptical shape in longitudinal section, and the discharge formed between the electrodes has arcuate shape. A coating applied on the inside or outside of the discharge vessel may have reflecting properties and can be used as a light reflector. The metallic coating extends in longitudinal direction over the central part of the discharge vessel, and in circumferential direction extends over the lower half thereof. It is stated that by using a metallic coating having the right reflecting properties, the light that would otherwise be lost may be used to illuminate the street.
However, a lamp of the described type is not very well suited for use in a complex shape reflector because light reflected at the reflective coating may lead to the light emitting part of the lamp no longer being optimally focused.
It is therefore the object of the invention to propose a lamp and a vehicle headlight where improved use is made of the emitted light without loosing focus.
This object is solved by a lamp according to claim 1 and a vehicle headlight according to claim 10. Dependent claims relate to preferred embodiments.
The invention is based on the observation that two main factors contribute to degradation of focus. On one hand, the shape of the reflective barrier in the prior art has not been chosen optimally. On the other hand, the arcuate shape of the discharge, when reflected, leads to a mirror image with an inverse arc, which may produce a ghost image.
In the lamp according to the invention, the discharge vessel is configured such that the arc discharge therein is essentially straight. Also, the reflective barrier, extends straight in longitudinal direction.
The lamp according to the invention makes good use of the light emitted by the discharge, because a part that would usually be shielded is reflected. At the same time, good focus is maintained.
This shape of the reflective barrier, together with the essentially straight arc discharge, leads to a well-defined mirror image of the discharge when reflected. The reflective barrier is arranged in longitudinal direction at least on a central part of the cylinder, and may extend up to the electrodes, and also beyond, to reflect the light from the arc discharge along its whole length in well-defined manner. It is, however, preferred to arrange the barrier such that it does not quite extend up to the electrodes, thus covering less than the electrode distance.
To achieve an essentially straight arc, the discharge vessel may have a specially chosen inner diameter, configured such that the arc discharge is confined by the cylinder wall such that its lateral deviation is limited. While the glass material mentioned in U.S. Pat. No. 6,445,129 will generally not exhibit the necessary heat resistance to confine the arc, this may be achieved by very high temperature resistant translucent or transparent ceramics material, e.g. Al2O3. A lamp of the type with a ceramic cylindrical discharge vessel is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,404,129, which is incorporated herein by reference. If the inner diameter of the cylindrical discharge vessel is denoted Di and the distance between the electrodes is denoted EA, it is preferred to choose dimensions such that Di≦2 mm and EA/Di<5. This small internal diameter, in relation to the electrode spacing, leads to the discharge arc being confined by the walls such that its shape is straightened, and preferably extends essentially straight between the electrodes along the central cylinder axis.
By confining the arc to limit deviation from the central axis the loss of focus caused by the completely uninhibited arcuate shape known from the prior art is minimized. In the present context, the term “essentially straight” referring to the arc discharge refers to an arc (as viewed from the side of a horizontally oriented discharge vessel) which exhibits a minimum of curvature, if any at all. To measure curvature of an arc, it is here proposed to consider a central curved line, following in longitudinal direction the maximum luminance of the (luminance distribution of the) arc. On this curve, we consider three points positioned at 5%, 95% and 50% of the electrode distance. Curvature of the arc may now be measured as the distance of the last point from a straight line through the first two. The curvature of the arc, measured in this way should be less than 0.1 mm, and preferably even less than 0.07 mm.
Generally, the reflective barrier may be configured in many different ways. It should, however, be considered that the usefulness of the reflected light in the final beam pattern decreases with increasing distance of the barrier from the arc. Therefore, two preferred embodiments are proposed here.
On one hand, it is possible to provide the reflective barrier as a coating on the outside of the inner envelope. In this case, the outside surface of the inner envelope comprises a wall extending straight in longitudinal direction. The reflective coating is arranged on the outer surface of the wall. This provides for a useful reflection pattern, because of a very small distance from the arc discharge. However, the coating material needs to be resistant to the high temperatures of the discharge vessel.
While it is generally preferred for the wall of the discharge vessel to be of at least substantially circular shape in cross-section, this may lead to a loss of focus if the arc discharge is not arranged in the center of the circle. Even a straight arc will in many cases not be positioned exactly between electrode centers, but may, due to convection, be shifted in upward direction from the center. To restore optimal focus, the wall may comprise at its outside surface, at least in the area of the coating, a special structure. This structure should provide reflection focused on the actual location of the arc discharge, which may be off-center. The structure may comprise a plurality of specially directed surfaces, arranged to reflect light from the location of the arc discharge back into the same location. The specially directed surfaces may be plane.
On the other hand, the reflective barrier may be provided on the inside of an outer envelope, which is arranged around the discharge vessel. Generally, an outer envelope is already used to protect the discharge vessel, mainly against oxidation, and to even temperature distribution. The outer envelope will advantageously include a wall where the inner surface extends straight in longitudinal direction. The reflective barrier, which is provided as a coating on this inside surface, is still close enough to the arc discharge to retain a useful beam pattern. The coating material still needs to be high temperature resistant, although the temperature on the outer envelope will not be as high as that of the discharge vessel.
Here again, the arc may be positioned off-center within the discharge vessel. The inside surface of the outer envelope preferably has circular cross section. To retain focus, the discharge vessel is arranged within the outer envelope in such a manner that the arc discharge is arranged in the center. Thus, the effect of an off-center arc within the discharge vessel may be countered by arranging the discharge vessel off-center within the outer envelope in opposite direction.
According to a development of the invention, the coating is non-conductive or has an insulating covering, which may be provided as a further coating of non-conducting material. This reduces the risk of the coating becoming part of the current path.
A further development of the invention relates to the part of the envelope covered by the reflective barrier in circumferential direction. It is preferred for the barrier to extend less than 180° around the cylinder, most preferably 140-165°. In a pre-ferred embodiment, the barrier extends such that it leaves light emitted in an angle of 195° (seen in cross-section) unshaded, such that a full 195° can be used for illumination without half-shade effects. This value has been shown to be advantageous if the lamp is to be used within a headlight reflector, preferably a complex shape reflector of a vehicle.
In the following, preferred embodiments of the invention will be explained with reference to the drawings, where
a shows an enlarged view of the circle A in
The discharge vessel 16 according to a first embodiment is shown in the sectional view in
This type of lamp is generally known, e.g. from U.S. Pat. No. 6,404,129. Therefore, further details of the lamp itself, such as parameters of material, operation, gas filling of the discharge space 24 and others will not be further discussed here.
It is a special feature of discharge vessel 16 that the internal diameter Di is quite small, e.g. only 1.2 mm or 1.3 mm. The distance EA between the electrode tips 20 is 3, 4 or 5 mm, so that the ratio EA/Di is 2.5 or 3.07 but at most 4.17. Because of this, the arc between electrodes 20 will be strictly confined by walls 22 and extend essentially straight between electrode tips 20.
The exact shape and position of the arc depends on a plurality of parameters like e.g. the pressure within discharge vessel 16 and the type of gas filling and salts added. The “essentially straight” arcs according to the invention may still show a very small curvature.
The arc 50 is regarded in side view in horizontal position of the lamp. Of course, the arc discharge 50 will not exhibit sharp edges, so the luminance distribution is considered.
A central curved line C is defined along the length of the arc 50 which corresponds to the maximum luminance. On this curve C, a first point P1 is defined at 5% of the distance EA between the electrodes, and a second point P2 is defined at 95% of EA. A central point Pc is defined as 50%. A distance of point Pc from the line through P1, P2 is defined as a distance d which is a measure of arc curvature.
It should be noted, that curvature is not defined as the distance of point Pc from the central axis of the electrodes 20. This is due to the fact, that in many cases the arc 50 will not extend from the electrode centers, but—although extending essentially straight—be shifted upward.
Back now in
In circumferential direction, the coating extends around the lower half of the discharge vessel 16 in
The combination of the (almost) straight arc, positioned in or close to the longitudinal central axis of the cylinder of discharge vessel 16 and the cylindrical shape of walls 22 leads to the effect that light emitted from the arc discharge in the shielded (<165°) direction is reflected back (almost) exactly into the arc. Thus, the light emitted from the discharge vessel 16 altogether is strongly focused.
This property can advantageously be employed when using lamp 20 in a vehicle headlight. The lamp described above can advantageously be used in vehicle headlights of both reflector and projection type.
Here, primary light is emitted from the arc in the useful 195° direction directly. On the other hand a secondary light portion emitted into the coating-covered directions is reflected back into the arc, and thus into the useful 195° direction. In this way, good use is made of the light emitted. Also the output pattern may include a strong light/dark cutoff.
Since the lower half of lamp 10 is shielded, there is no need to employ a complete, generally symmetrical reflector 62 as shown in
b shows lamp 10 employed in a projector type vehicle headlamp 61. Here, the desired output pattern, including a light/dark cutoff is achieved by means of a glare shield 58.
The reflector 62 is of essentially elliptical shape. A lens 56 serves to project the light onto the street. In a projection type headlamp as shown, the coating 28 could extend further in longitudinal direction, and also the exact value of an unshielded 195° area in circumferential direction is not critical here, because light/dark cutoff is achieved in a different way as compared to reflector type headlamps.
The coating 28 applied on the outer surface of ceramic wall 22 of a discharge vessel 16 must be temperature resistant for the operating temperature of the lamp. A possible reflective coating would comprise several layers of SiO2 in a configuration with reflective properties. In a preferred embodiment, 30 layers of SiO2 and ZrO2 or alternatively of SiO2 and Ta2O5 are provided, which gives a reflective coating temperature resistant up to 1275° C. The number of layers and their thickness depends on the desired reflection coefficient for the different wavelengths.
The given materials are non-conductive, which is preferred to reduce the risk of voltage breakdown outside of the discharge vessel.
As shown in
It should, of course, be noted, that the shifting of the arc with respect to the centrally arranged electrodes is due to gravity and therefore its direction depends on orientation of lamp 10. However, a lamp will have its recommended orientation for use, which is generally horizontal, and the compensation archived with focus surfaces 40 will correspond to this preferred orientation.
Since ceramic wall 22 may be produced by extrusion, the shape of focus surfaces 40 may be incorporated during production. Of course, in alternative embodiments the focus surfaces 40 need not be plain, but may resemble circle segments etc.
Discharge vessel 16 with arc discharge 50 is arranged inside of outer cylinder 14. In contrast to the first and second embodiment above, a reflective coating 28 is not arranged on the discharge vessel 16, but on the inside of outer cylinder 14.
Outer cylinder 14 is, at least in its central portion surrounding the discharge vessel 16, of cylindrical shape and its inner surface 42 has circular cross-section. The walls of cylinder 14 extend straight in longitudinal direction, such that inner surface 42 runs parallel to the central axis of cylinder 14. Thus, reflective coating 28 arranged on the inside of cylinder 14 is focused towards the central axis.
Light emitted from an arc discharge 50 within discharge vessel 16 will therefore be reflected back at reflective coating 28 to its originating position, such that good focus is maintained. If the arc 50 is positioned off-center, for the reasons explained above, there is a certain loss of focus. This might still be acceptable up to a certain level. However, in the embodiments according to
In addition to or alternatively to the given compensation methods, other measures may be taken to compensate for an off-center arc. For example, comparable to the second embodiment, the outer cylinder may comprise a compensating structure on its inner surface 42 to restore focus to an off-center arc.
The coating 28 provided on the inner surface 42 of outer cylinder 14 may be provided as a dip coating. Possible materials would include Ni—P with a melting point between 600 and 1000° C. depending on phosphor content, and Ni—W, which will resist even higher temperatures.
Here, again care should be taken to avoid voltage breakdown outside of the discharge vessel 16 instead of inside, especially for high voltage ignition peaks in the order of 25 kV. This may be achieved by providing sufficient distance between current wires and a conductive coating, like Ni—P or Ni—W. Preferably, the coating should be non-conducting. If, however, an electrically conducting layer 28 is used in a configuration where the distance may not be enough, a transparent insulating layer 44 may be provided as shown in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
04104097.3 | Aug 2004 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2005/052682 | 8/15/2005 | WO | 00 | 2/19/2007 |