The present invention relates generally to devices for controlling NOx emissions in combustion processes, and more particularly to a spray device or system for directing a reducing agent, such as urea, into a combustion zone or discharging combustion gases for NOx emission control.
NOx emissions are a product of combustion processes and contribute to major pollution problems such as acid rain. Two processes for de-nitrification are SNCR (Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction) and SCR (Selective Catalytic Reduction). Both processes commonly use ammonia as a reducing agent in the de-nitrification process of converting NOx into nitrogen and water vapor.
With the SNCR (Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction) process, ammonia is injected directly into combustion flame at temperatures that range from about 878 to 1158 degrees C. (1600 to 2100 degrees F.). The ammonia directly reacts with the NOx, reducing the emissions by 30–70%.
With the SCR (Selective Catalytic Reduction) process, ammonia vapor is injected into the flue gas stream at temperatures from 318 to 430 degrees C. (600 to 800 degrees F.). The gas then passes over a catalyst where the reaction occurs reducing the emissions by 80 to 90%. In this process, atomization and control of droplet size are critical to the reaction process because of the reduced reaction temperature necessitated by the operating temperature of the catalyst.
In both reduction methods an injection system for the ammonia is used. Because of the higher operating temperatures with the SNCR process, hydraulic nozzles can be used without the necessity for pressurized air atomization of the liquid reducing agent. In such SNCR processes, hydraulic nozzles are mounted on lances that extend into the combustion flame. In the SCR process, air-atomizing nozzles are mounted on lances that extend into the discharging gas stream. Because of the lower temperatures at such location, the injection device must supply small droplets that vaporize quickly.
Safety concerns with anhydrous and aqueous ammonia has increased interest in using urea as a safe and economical alternative. The major problem with urea is that it is temperature sensitive. The temperature of the urea must be maintained below 70° C. (158° F.) prior to atomization and direction to avoid crystallization. If the urea crystallizes due to prior exposure to high temperatures it will clog the injection piping and discharge orifices. Atomization and control of droplet size also are critical to the reaction process because any crystallization of the urea prior to atomization and discharge is detrimental to reaction process.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a spraying system for direction of temperature sensitive reducing agents, such as urea, for NOx emission control in combustion processes which prevents crystallization of the urea that might impede the flow and atomization of the reducing agent. More particularly, the invention relates to a specially designed lance-type spray device which recirculates the reducing agent, i.e. urea, to keep it below its crystallization temperature prior to atomization and discharge. Urea that is not atomized and discharged is returned to a supply vessel, where it is cooled and then fed to the directing lance in a recirculating loop. The urea itself is used as a cooling medium. The lance can be fitted with hydraulic or air atomizing nozzles depending on the process, SNCR or SCR. The lance also can be fitted with additional cooling means depending on the application, such as a liquid cooling jacket, a cooling air discharge tube, a vacuum insulator jacket, or an insulation jacket.
The invention further can be used in other elevated temperature applications, such as gas cooling and conditioning. Nor is the invention limited to urea atomizing/injection applications.
Other objects and advantages of the invention will become apparent upon reading the following detailed description and upon reference to the drawings, in which:
While the invention is susceptible of various modifications and alternative constructions, certain illustrative embodiments thereof have been shown in the drawings and will be described below in detail. It should be understood, however, that there is no intention to limit the invention to the specific forms disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, alternative constructions, and equivalents falling within the spirit and scope of the invention.
Referring now more particularly to
Urea directed into the inlet fitting 12 is communicated through the feed tube 11 into and through the nozzle 15. As indicated previously, urea is highly temperature sensitive and will crystallize and clog the spray apparatus at temperatures far below those occurring in the environment of combustion processes with which NOx emission control equipment commonly is used.
In accordance with the invention, the lance-type spraying device is designed to maintain a liquid reducing agent, i.e., in this case urea, at temperatures for optimized atomization and direction, without premature crystallization. To this end, only a portion of the urea supplied to the nozzle is discharged with the remainder of the urea being recirculated to be urea supply along a passageway encompassing the feed tube. In the illustrated embodiment, the urea supply tube 11 is disposed within a urea return tube 25 which together define an annular urea return passage 26 for excess urea directed to the nozzle 14. The urea return tube 25 in this case is fixed in sealed relation at its downstream end to the nozzle holder 14 and has one or more radial passages 28 adjacent its downstream end which communicate with the return passage 26.
It will be seen that urea directed through the feed tube 11 in part will be directed into and discharge from the spray nozzle 14, and in part, by reason of the liquid back pressure, will be directed through the radial passages 28 and into the return passage 26. Urea entering the return passage 26 is forced through the return tube 25 to a urea return fitting 29 adjacent an upstream side of the urea feed inlet 12. The urea feed tube 11 in this case extends in sealed relation through the fitting 29. It will be appreciated that urea may be directed from the return fitting 29 to the liquid supply which may be maintained at a predetermined temperature for supplying urea to the feed tube 11. Hence, recirculation of a portion of the liquid reducing agent about and substantially along the length of the urea feed tube 11 itself provides a cooling medium to prevent overheating of the urea prior to atomization and discharge from the spray device.
In carrying out the invention, the lance-type spray device 10 is designed such that atomizing air directed to the spray nozzle 14 functions as a further cooling medium for the urea for maintaining the feed liquid within an acceptable temperature range for effective spraying. To this end, the spray device 10 includes an air atomizing air tube 32 mounted in concentric surrounding relation to the urea return tube 25 for defining an annular atomizing air passage 34 which extends along a substantial length of the urea return tube 25. The atomizing air tube 32 has a downstream end fixed in sealed relation adjacent the nozzle holder 14 and an upstream end which has an atomizing air inlet fitting 35. The atomizing air tube 32 in this case has an upstream end plate 36 through which the urea return tube 25 extends in sealed relation. Atomizing air directed to the inlet fitting 35 will pass through the atomizing air passage 34 through passages in or adjacent the nozzle holder 14, and communicate with the air passages 21 in the nozzle 15 for intermixing with, atomizing and assisting in direction of the desired discharging liquid spray. It can be seen that the atomizing air itself becomes an additional cooling medium for insulating the liquid urea directed through the spray device from the high temperatures associated with the combustion process.
In further carrying out the invention, the illustrated spray device 10 has an external cooling jacket 40 which includes an elongated liquid cooling jacket tube 41 disposed in concentric relation about a substantial length of the atomizing air tube 32 for defining an elongated liquid cooling chamber 42 about a substantial length of the atomizing air tube 32. The liquid cooling chamber 42 has end plates 44, 45 with a cooling liquid inlet fitting 46 which in this case has a tubular extension 48 for emitting cooling liquid at a location intermediate the ends of the cooling chamber 42. The cooling liquid flows in surrounding relation about the length of the atomizing air tube and is returned in circulating fashion to the cooling liquid supply through a return fitting 49, which in this case is located in the same end plate 44 as the inlet fitting 42.
From the foregoing, it will be seen that during operation of the lance-type spray device, simultaneous with the feed of the liquid reducing agent, namely liquid urea, through the feed tube 11, recirculating travel of the liquid urea through the urea return tube 25, combined with the flow of atomizing air and a cooling liquid through the concentrically mounted atomizing air tube 32 and liquid cooling jacket tube 41 effectively insulate the feed liquid from high temperatures associated with the combustion process for preventing crystallization of the urea prior to atomization and direction from the spray device.
It will be understood by one skilled in the art that advantages of the present invention may be obtained in various alternative embodiments of spray devices, as described below, where items similar to those described above have been given similar reference numerals. With reference to
Referring now to
With reference to
With reference to
Finally, with reference to
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US03/31181 | 10/2/2003 | WO | 00 | 10/3/2005 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2004/030827 | 4/15/2004 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1849814 | Woodruff | Mar 1932 | A |
3902850 | Lehnert | Sep 1975 | A |
5503548 | Franke et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5954267 | Yamasaki et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060108443 A1 | May 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60415421 | Oct 2002 | US |