The present invention relates to reduction of aircraft noise, and specifically to acoustic liners to reduce airframe noise during takeoff and landing.
Aircraft noise is a significant issue with economic and public health implications, especially for communities near airports. As a result, increasingly stringent international constraints are being placed on aircraft companies to reduce this noise. Aircraft noise is generally divided into two categories. The first has to do with noise generated by the propulsion system, while the second is related to noise generated by the interaction of mean flow over the airframe as it traverses through the air.
One aspect of the present invention is a landing gear door of the type that covers retractable landing gear of an aircraft when the landing gear is retracted during flight. The landing gear door shifts outwardly when the landing gear is deployed. The landing gear door includes a door structure defining first and second opposite sides. The first and second opposite sides have first and second opposite surfaces, respectively. The door structure further includes edge surfaces extending between the first and second sides, and the door structure defines an internal structure disposed between the first and second opposite sides. The door structure defines a porous surface on at least one of the first and second opposite side surfaces, and the internal structure defines at least one internal acoustic chamber or passageway defining a first end that is acoustically connected to the porous surface such that at least a substantial portion of sound entering the elongated acoustic chamber or passageway at the first end thereof is absorbed by the internal structure of the landing gear door. The internal acoustic chambers or passageways may be elongated. The landing gear door may include a plurality of internal acoustic chambers, each having the same length, or one or more of the chambers may have a different length than one or more of the other chambers. The internal chambers may be substantially linear, or they may include angled portions that extend at angles that are typically in the range of about 30° to about 90° relative to other portions of the chambers. One or more of the internal acoustic chambers may be partially or completely tilled with an acoustic bulk material such as foam or other suitable material to provide the desired propagation and absorption of sound within the internal acoustic chambers. The chambers may have closed inner ends, or the chambers may have open opposite ends whereby sound entering one of the openings is transmitted through the chamber, and a portion of the sound that is not absorbed in the chamber is emitted from the other opening. The chambers thereby form passageways whereby sound can thereby be transmitted between inner and outer surfaces of the landing gear door, or between different locations on the same surface of the landing gear door.
These and other features, advantages, and objects of the present invention will be further understood and appreciated by those skilled in the art by reference to the following specification, claims, and appended drawings.
For purposes of description herein, the terms “upper,” “lower,” “right,” “left,” “rear,” “front,” “vertical,” “horizontal,” and derivatives thereof shall be related to the invention as oriented in
An aircraft 1 (
With reference to
With further reference to
The door structure 24 also defines an acoustic liner 8 comprising an internal structure or body 42 disposed between the first and second opposite sides 26 and 28. The door structure 24 includes a porous surface 44 on at least one of the first and second opposite side surfaces 30 and 32. The internal structure 42 defines at least one internal acoustic chamber 50. The internal acoustic chambers 50 have first ends 52 that are acoustically connected to the porous surface 44 such that at least a substantial portion of sound entering the acoustic chambers 50 at the first end 52 is absorbed by the internal structure 42 of the landing gear door 20.
Referring again to
The internal chambers 50 may have circular cross-sectional shapes, and the cross-sectional area of the internal chambers 50 may be substantially constant along the length of the internal chambers 50. Alternately, the chambers 50 may have non-circular cross-sectional shapes (e.g., quadrilateral shaped), and/or the cross-sectional area of the chambers 50 may vary.
Also, as shown in
Porous surface 44 of acoustic liner 8 may comprise a thin sheet of metal or other suitable material having a plurality of perforations therethrough. Alternately, porous surface 44 may comprise a mesh or the like, or the porous surface 44 may be formed by the internal structure 42 itself, Acoustic filler material 48 such as foam or other suitable material may be positioned in one or more of the internal chambers 50, and the filler material 48 may partially or completely fill the chambers 50. The internal structure 42 may comprise a metal material, fiber composites, or other suitable material.
With further reference to
The acoustic treatment embedded within the volume of the landing gear doors 20 and 20A changes the boundary condition at the surface(s) 30 (and 32) such that sound is absorbed within the door 20 or 20A. The internal acoustic chambers 50A and porous surface 44 of liners 8 and 8A also change the boundary conditions of the door 20 to inhibit the generation of noise at the surface 30 and/or 32.
As discussed above, the lengths of internal acoustic chambers 50A of the liner 8A of door 20A (
If the internal volume defined by chambers 50 is filled with foam 48 or the like, sound that enters through the porous surface 44 of the liner 8 of door 20 travels in multiple directions within the foam. If configured in this way, the sound can travel in multiple directions, and exit the liner 8 of door 20 via different portions of the porous surface 44. The chambers 50 may include openings at opposite ends at surface 30 and 32, or the acoustic chambers 50 may have multiple openings at surface 30 or multiple openings at surface 32. Surface 32 may also comprise a porous surface 44 having a sheet 46 with perforations 47.
It will be understood that the specific acoustic liner configurations and door geometries discussed above in connection with
The sound-absorbing liner and landing gear door discussed above are utilized for main landing gear assemblies 14 (
It is to be understood that variations and modifications can be made on the aforementioned structure without departing from the concepts of the present invention, and further it is to be understood that such concepts are intended to be covered by the following claims unless these claims by their language expressly state otherwise,
This application is related to co-pending U.S. patent application Nos. 13/417,347 and 13/417,351, filed on Mar. 12, 2012. This application claims the benefits of U.S. Provisional Application Nos. 61/451,727, filed on Mar. 11, 2011; 61/451,730 filed on Mar. 11, 2011; 61/451,735 filed on Mar. 11, 2011; and 61/597,282, filed on Feb. 10, 2012, the entire contents of all which are incorporated by reference.
The invention described herein was made in part by employees of the United States Government and may be manufactured and used by or for the Government of the United States of America for governmental purposes without the payment of any royalties thereon or therefore.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3612146 | Klein | Oct 1971 | A |
3779338 | Hayden et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
3821999 | Guess et al. | Jul 1974 | A |
3853428 | Hayden et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
4240250 | Harris | Dec 1980 | A |
4836469 | Wagenfeld | Jun 1989 | A |
5543198 | Wilson | Aug 1996 | A |
6454219 | Moe | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6948906 | Leishman et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7458542 | Chow et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7484930 | Hutcheson et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7637462 | Pal | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7866939 | Harper et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7954757 | Moe et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7967108 | Harper | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8033510 | Shmilovich et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8056850 | Lin et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8096513 | Mau et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
20040197194 | Leishman et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20070020099 | Hutcheson et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20080179448 | Layland et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090084905 | Mau et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100133378 | Lidoine | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100294883 | Trich, Jr. et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20130062143 | Ichihashi | Mar 2013 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Tony L. Parrott, et al, “Parallel-element liner impedances for improved absorption of broadband sound in ducts.” Noise Control Engineering Journal, Nov.-Dec. 1995, pp. 183-195, vol. 43(6). |
L. S. Wirt, “Analysis, Testing, and Design of Lined Ducts,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, May 1972, pp. 1448-1463, vol. 51(5), Part 1. |
Tony L. Parrott, et al., “Effect of Resonator Axis Skew on Normal Incidence Impedance,” AIAA 2003-3307, 9th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, May 12-14, 2003, pp. 1-8, Hilton Head, South Carolina. |
Brian M. Howerton, et al., “Validation of an Acoustic impedance Prediction Model for Skewed Resonators,” AIAA 2009-3143, May 2009, pp. 1-21. |
M. G. Jones, et al., “Assessment of Soft Vane and Metal Foam Engine Noise Reduction Concepts,” AIAA 2009-3142, May 2009, pp. 1-20. |
Mehdi R. Khorrami, et al., “Application of Passive Porous Treatment to Slat Trailing Edge Noise,” NASA/TM-2003-212416, May 2003, pp. 1-14. |
Mehdi R. Khorrami, et al., “Novel Approach for Reducing Rotor Tip-Clearance-Induced Noise in Turbofan Engines,” AIAA Journal, Aug. 2002, pp. 1618-1528, vol. 40, No. 8. |
Meelan Choudhari, et al., “Computational Study of Porous Treatment for Altering Flap Side-Edge Flowfield,” AIAA 2003-3113, 9th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, May 12-14, 2003, pp. 1-15, Hilton Head, South Carolina. |
W. Clifton Horne, et al., “Measurements of 26%-scale 777 Airframe Noise in the NASA Ames 40-by 80 Foot Wind Tunnel,” AIAA 2005-2810, 11th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (26th AIAA Aerocoustics Conference), May 23-25, 2005, pp. 1-19, Monterey, California. |
D. Angland, et al., “Measurements of Flow around a Flap Side-Edge with Porous Edge Treatment.” AIAA 2006-213. 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Jan. 9-12, 2006, pp. 1-22, Reno. Nevada. |
D. Angland, et al., “Measurements of Flow around a Flap Side Edge with Porous Edge Treatment,” AIAA Journal, Jul. 7, 2009, pp. 1660-1671, vol. 47, No. 7. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61451730 | Mar 2011 | US | |
61451727 | Mar 2011 | US | |
61451735 | Mar 2011 | US | |
61597282 | Feb 2012 | US |