It is necessary to move aircrafts on the ground between the take-off/landing runway and their parking spaces. Some of these movements follow a straight or curved trajectory with a large radius and are made at a relatively high speed (this is referred to as “taxiing”). Other movements occur before the aircraft stops or follow a curved trajectory with a small radius and must therefore be made at a reduced speed (this is called “manoeuvring”).
Conventionally, these movements are performed using:
Such an aircraft has a relatively high overall fuel consumption considering the use of the main engine on the ground and in flight.
To remedy this, it is known to provide the aircraft with a rotation-driving system for one or more wheel(s) of the landing gear of the aircraft so as to allow the aircraft to move on the ground without using its main engine.
To strive to aircrafts provided with more, or only, electric equipment, the rotating drive device uses one or more electric motor(s) that is/are controlled by an electronic control unit connected to a control interface installed in the aircraft cockpit.
However, this arrangement leads to a break in the habits of pilots who have difficulty feeling perfectly comfortable during taxiing.
One aim of the invention is to supply means for facilitating the control of aircraft on the ground.
For this purpose, according to the invention, a motorizing device is provided for moving on the ground an aircraft having a landing device having wheels, the motorizing device comprising at least one electric motor having an output shaft provided with means for its rotational connection to at least one of the wheels of the landing device to drive said rotating wheel, and an electronic control unit connected on the one hand to the motor to control it and on the other hand to a control interface from which the pilot of the aircraft can transmit control signals which the electronic control unit is arranged to transform into motor control signals. The control unit is arranged to implement a first control law having determined dynamics to promote an aircraft movement speed and a second control law having dynamics to promote the aircraft manoeuvrability.
The ground evolutions of the aircraft include movements along straight paths and movements along curved paths. Straight movements must be possible at a speed between a minimum and maximum speed depending on whether the pilot wishes to stop soon or cross a take-off/landing runway as quickly as possible. The maximum speed of the movements in curves is conditioned by the radius of the curved trajectories: the smaller the radius, the lower the maximum possible speed. The invention allows easy control of the aircraft in each of these phases. The maximum speeds are determined in function of dynamics of the aircraft on the ground resulting from the eight of the center of gravity of the aircraft and the track of the landing gear for example.
Other characteristics and advantages of the invention will become apparent from reading the following description of a particular non-restrictive embodiment of the invention.
Reference is made to the appended drawings, wherein:
The invention is described, with reference to the figures, in application to an aircraft, here an aircraft A, equipped with a landing gear, a front landing gear L with wheels W is shown in
Aircraft A is equipped with a motorizing device, generally referred to as 1, to move the aircraft A on the ground.
The motorizing device 1 comprises an electric motor 2 having an output shaft provided with means for its rotational connection to the wheels W of the front landing gear L for driving said wheels W in rotation.
The motorizing device also includes an electronic control unit 3 connected to the electric motor 2 to control it and to a control interface 4 which is located in the cockpit of the aircraft A. From the control interface 4, the pilot of the aircraft A can emit control signals that the electronic control unit 3 is arranged to transform into motor 2 control signals.
The electronic control unit 3 includes a processor (or any other type of computer such as an ASIC circuit, an FPGA, a microcontroller . . . ) and a memory containing at least one program containing instructions arranged for the implementation of a control program for the motorizing device 1.
The control program executed by the electronic control unit 3 includes several control laws implementing loops and control strategies to control the motor 2 according to the electrical signals emitted by the control interface 4, namely:
With particular reference to
The first scale 11 comprises two ends 11.1, 11.2 corresponding respectively to a maximum speed and a minimum speed, here zero, to control the electric motor 2 between these two speeds, depending on the position of the control element 10 along the first scale 11, by implementing the first control law.
The second scale 12 comprises a first section 12.1 having a first end corresponding to a maximum forward speed and a second end corresponding to a zero speed and which is connected to a first end of a second section 12.2 having a second end corresponding to a maximum reverse speed. The control element 10 can be moved along the second scale 12 to control the motor between one of the two maximum speeds and zero speed depending on the position of the control element 10:
For a given movement amplitude of the control element 10, the first control law determines a predetermined acceleration:
In addition, the maximum speed achievable with the first control law is higher than that achievable with the other two control laws.
For a given movement amplitude of the control element 10, the second control law determines a predetermined acceleration (e.g. an acceleration of 4 kn per second, it should be reminded that 1 kn, or knot, is 1852 m/hr) greater than the acceleration determined by the third control law (e.g. 0.5 kn per second) for the same movement amplitude of the control element 10. Alternatively, for a given movement amplitude of the control element 10, the second control law determines a predetermined acceleration equal to, or less than, the acceleration determined by the third control law for the same movement amplitude of the control element 10.
The acceleration predetermined by the first control law is compatible (i.e. more suitable) with a straight line movement or with curved long radius trajectories (resulting from a steering angle of the front landing gear between 0° and 30° for example) at a relatively high speed as during taxiing (at a speed between 10 and 20 kn for example).
The acceleration predetermined by the second control law is more suitable for making small radius turns (resulting from a steering angle of the front landing gear between 31° and 74° for example) at relatively low speeds (less than 10 kn for example) such as entering or leaving a parking space.
Also according to
According to the second embodiment shown in
The switch 20 rotates here between a taxi position “Taxi” to command the control unit 3 to apply the first control law and a manoeuvring position “Man” to command the control unit 3 to apply the second control law.
The switch 30 rotates here between a “Forward” position to command the control unit 3 to drive the motor 2 forward and a “Reverse” position to command the control unit 3 to drive the motor 2 reverse. It should be noted that the control unit 3 is arranged to take into account the selection of the forward or reverse direction only when the switch 20 is in the manoeuvring position, in the taxi position only a forward movement is possible. It can be expected that placing the switch 20 in the taxi position will cause a LED on the switch 30 to light up to indicate that it is activated.
The corresponding operating mode is described in
Of course, the invention is not limited to the described embodiment but encompasses any alternative solution within the scope of the invention as defined in the claims.
The device may have a structure different from the one described.
The device of the invention may be used for motorizing one or several wheel(s) of an aircraft. The device may include two electric motors each associated to one of the main landing gears and connected to the wheels of the main landing gear of the aircraft.
Switches 20, 30 can be replaced by any other device allowing selection and for example switch buttons such as push buttons.
The control element 10 can be replaced by any device allowing continuous variation, such as a potentiometer. The control element 10 could also be replaced by a switch allowing speed selection from predefined values. A speed selection switch for taxiing and a speed selection switch for manoeuvring could be provided, with the actuation of either switch automatically selecting the corresponding control law.
The control element 10 and switches 20, 30 can also be replaced by one or more touch screen(s).
The operating mode may be different from the one described. For example, the motorizing device can be designed so that it does not operate in reverse. The operating mode corresponds to that of
A single speed can also be provided in reverse.
The steering angles or speeds mentioned may differ from those mentioned for information purposes in the description.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1873419 | Dec 2018 | FR | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5038887 | Sousek | Aug 1991 | A |
9139294 | Bayer | Sep 2015 | B2 |
20080147252 | Bayer | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090261197 | Cox et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20120018574 | Bayer | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20140061373 | Krenz | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20150129713 | Cox | May 2015 | A1 |
20150134149 | De Mers | May 2015 | A1 |
20150375853 | Kawalkar | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160170435 | Brinkley | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160176517 | Cox | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20170057624 | Lo et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 944 775 | Oct 2010 | FR |
Entry |
---|
French search report for FR Application 18 73419 dated Sep. 6, 2019. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200198775 A1 | Jun 2020 | US |