The present invention relates to GPS positioning and, more specifically, a system and method for fusing localizations upon a roadway.
Global positioning satellite (“GPS”) technology is widely used as a means for locating an automobile upon a roadway. As autonomous and semi-autonomous vehicles become more advanced, accurately knowing the vehicle's position in the roadway becomes critical. For example, self-driving cars by Volvo and Tesla have been easily confused by faded lane markers and other shabby road conditions. Further, current GPS technology is inaccurate. To achieve a fully autonomous self-driving vehicle requires the ability of a computer to determine the vehicle's lateral position within a roadway with great precision. Additionally, advanced driver-assistance systems (“ADAS”) benefit greatly from this ability. For example, lane keeping assistance (“LKA”) systems, lane departure warning (“LDW”) systems, and lane change assistance systems would be greatly benefited by accurately knowing the vehicle's lateral position within a lane. Other examples of ADAS systems include adaptive cruise control, adaptive light control, anti-lock braking systems, automatic parking, blind spot monitoring, collision avoidance systems, intersection detection, lane departure warning systems, parking sensors, turning assistance, and wrong-way driving warning.
A vehicle may utilize various levels of autonomous driving. For example, a first level of autonomous driving may assist a human driver during some driving tasks such as steering or engine acceleration/deceleration. A second level of autonomous driving may conduct some steering and acceleration/deceleration while the human driver monitors the driving environment and controls the remaining driving tasks. Such a system is referred to as a partially automated system. A third level of autonomous driving may conduct driving tasks and monitor the driving environment, but the human driver must be ready to retake control when the automated system requests. Such a system is generally referred to as a conditionally automated system. A fourth level of autonomous driving may drive the vehicle and monitor road conditions; the human driver does not need to take control but the system may only operate in specific conditions and environments such as inside of a factory, on a closed road course, or within a bounded area. Such a system is referred to as a highly automated system. A fifth level of autonomous driving may perform all driving and road-monitoring tasks in all driving conditions. Such a system is referred to as a fully-automated system.
Current technology relies on GPS technology to determine a vehicle's lateral position within a roadway. However, this method is susceptible to a high amount of drift—the lateral area around the vehicle that is within the technology's margin of error. The amount of drift in a given system is dependent on many factors including signal strength and the precision of the GPS hardware being used. Typical GPS devices aimed at the average consumer have a drift of about 10 meters. Even with the most precise instruments having the best signal strength, a system experiences a drift of 1-2 meters or more, which is unacceptable for self-driving vehicles.
To improve the accuracy of GPS positioning, current technology also employs an inertial measurement unit (“IMU”). An IMU is an electronic device that measures and reports a vehicle's specific force and angular rate using a combination of accelerometers and gyroscopes. However, even while being augmented with IMU's, current lateral locating methods and systems still experience a high amount of drift. For such a system to be useful in a self-driving vehicle, the resolution needs to be approximately 10 cm or less.
Therefore, what is needed is a system that can utilize GPS information and determine a vehicle's lateral position within a roadway with great accuracy. This need has heretofore remained unsatisfied.
The present invention overcomes these and other deficiencies of the prior art by providing a system and method for determining a vehicle's location within a roadway lane by comparing information relating to the vehicle's environment against regional information stored in a database. To improve the accuracy of the vehicle's predicted location, the present invention may further utilize previously determined predicted locations fused with vehicle's instant predicted location. In an exemplary embodiment, the present invention comprises a method for determining a vehicle's location comprising the steps of approximating the vehicle's region; receiving a region map from a database, wherein the region map corresponds to the vehicle's approximated region and comprises a plurality of region points indicating an expected roadway lane; receiving a first response image generated by a first imaging device, the first response image comprising information relating to the vehicle's environment; generating a first response map from the first response image, the first response map comprising a plurality of first response points indicating the vehicle's location; comparing the first response map to the region map; and predicting the vehicle's location based on the differences between the first response points and the region points.
In another exemplary embodiment, the present invention further comprises the steps of receiving a second response image generated by a second imaging device, the second response image comprising information relating to the vehicle's environment; generating a second response map from the second response image, the second response map comprising a plurality of second response points indicating the vehicle's location; and comparing the second response map to the region map; wherein the step of predicting the vehicle's location further comprises comparing the differences between the second response points, the first response points, and the region points.
In another exemplary embodiment, the present invention further comprises the steps of receiving a third response image generated by a third imaging device, the third response image comprising information relating to the vehicle's environment; generating a third response map from the third response image, the third response map comprising a plurality of third response points indicating the vehicle's location; and comparing the third response map to the region map; wherein the step of predicting the vehicle's location further comprises comparing the differences between the third response points, second response points, the first response points, and the region points.
In another exemplary embodiment, the vehicle's region may be approximated using a GPS device or an IMU device.
In another exemplary embodiment, the step of generating a response map may further comprises the steps of detecting lane markers in the response image, the lane markers pertaining to physical aspects contained in the response image; and plotting the response points on the response map, the response points indicating locations of the lane markers.
In another exemplary embodiment, the present invention may further comprise the step of generating a confidence score.
In another exemplary embodiment, the response image may be generated from radar sensing equipment, LIDAR sensing equipment, GPS sensing information, and/or images.
In another exemplary embodiment, the region map and response map may be compared at a selected frequency.
In another exemplary embodiment, the selected frequency may be at least 20 cycles per second.
In another exemplary embodiment, the present invention may further comprise the step of outputting the vehicle's predicted location to an ADAS.
In another exemplary embodiment, the first imaging device, the second imaging device, and the third imaging device may be each adapted to perceive different aspects of the vehicle's environment.
In another exemplary embodiment, the present invention comprises a system for determining a vehicle's location on a roadway comprising a locating device adapted to determine a vehicle's geographic region; a database comprising a plurality of region maps, the region maps comprising a plurality of region points; a first imaging device adapted to perceive information relating to the vehicle's environment; a processor operably connected to the locating device, the database, and the first imaging device, the processor, at a predetermined frequency, adapted to receive, from the locating device, the vehicle's determined geographic region; receive, from the database, the region map corresponding to the vehicle's determined geographic region; receive, from the first imaging device, information perceived relating to the vehicle's environment; generate a first response map, the first response map comprising a plurality of first response points corresponding to lane markers detected within the first response map; compare the first response map to the region map; and determine the vehicle's predicted location based on the comparison of the region map and the first response map.
In another exemplary embodiment, the processor may be further configured to generate a fused vehicle location comprising the vehicle's predicted location and a previously determined vehicle location.
In another exemplary embodiment, the present invention may further comprise a second imaging device adapted to perceive information relating to the vehicle's environment; wherein the processor is further adapted to receive, from the second imaging device, information perceived relating to the vehicle's environment; generate a second response map, from the second response map comprising a plurality of second response points corresponding to lane markers detected within the second response map; and determine the vehicle's predicted location based on the comparison of the region map, the first response map, and the second response map.
In another exemplary embodiment, the present invention may further comprise a third imaging device adapted to perceive information relating to the vehicle's environment; wherein the processor is further adapted to receive, from the third imaging device, information perceived relating to the vehicle's environment; generate a third response map, from the third response map comprising a plurality of third response points corresponding to lane markers detected within the third response map; and determine the vehicle's predicted location based on the comparison of the region map, the first response map, the second response map, and the third response map.
In another exemplary embodiment, the locating device may comprise a GPS device or an IMU device.
In another exemplary embodiment, the imaging device may comprise a camera or a LIDAR device.
In another exemplary embodiment, the predetermined frequency may be at least 20 cycles per second.
In another exemplary embodiment, the processor may be further configured to output the vehicle's predicted location to an ADAS.
In another exemplary embodiment, the processor may be further configured to determine a confidence score.
In another exemplary embodiment, the first imaging device, the second imaging device, and the third imaging device may be each adapted to perceive different aspects of the vehicle's environment.
For a more complete understanding of the present invention, the objects and advantages thereof, reference is now made to the ensuing descriptions taken in connection with the accompanying drawings briefly described as follows:
Further features and advantages of the invention, as well as the structure and operation of various embodiments of the invention, are described in detail below with reference to the accompanying
In an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure, the system may utilize pieces of hardware including a plurality of cameras installed on a vehicle, a database, and an on-board computer, to iteratively update the vehicle's location and position relative to the lane of traffic in which it is traveling.
In an embodiment, the plurality of cameras may be installed on the vehicle and their positions and view angles are predetermined relative to the rest of the vehicle on which it is installed. In another embodiment, the plurality of cameras comprises three cameras: a first camera, a second camera, and a third camera. In one embodiment, all three cameras are installed on the vehicle in substantially the same location on the vehicle having substantially the same viewing angle. Such an embodiment would be used to provide redundancy in the event one of the cameras failed. In another embodiment, the three cameras are installed on the vehicle at different locations with different viewing angles. Such an embodiment is used to increase the accuracy of lane marking localization and fusion system in that the more viewing angles the system has to fuse location data, the greater the accuracy will be. As contemplated herein, the plurality of cameras may be installed such that they are permanently, semi-permanently, or temporarily attached to the vehicle. For example, one or more of the plurality of camera may be installed onto the vehicle such that it is integrated into the vehicle. In such an example, the camera may be installed such that it is permanently installed on the vehicle. In another example, one or more of the plurality of cameras is installed on the vehicle such that it is easily removable from the vehicle, thereby allowing the user to remove and reinstall it on another vehicle. Further, the plurality of cameras need not be dedicated to the use of the present disclosure. For example, one or more of the plurality of cameras may be embodied by cellular telephones having a built-in camera. In such an embodiment, the on-board computer may be configured to communicatively connect to the cellular telephone and receive imaging data therefrom.
In another embodiment of the present disclosure, the plurality of cameras may have different focus points and different aperture sizes. In such an embodiment, for example, the first camera may have a focus point close to the front of the vehicle such that the first camera will have the most accurate information close to the vehicle. Further in such an embodiment, the third camera may have a focus point far from the front of the vehicle in the direction of travel. In such an embodiment, the third camera will have the greatest accuracy capturing images far off into the distance. In another embodiment, the second camera may have a large aperture to allow the camera to more sensitive in low light conditions. In another embodiment, one of the plurality of cameras may be configured to capture a spectrum of light different than what is visible to the human eye. For example, one of the cameras may be configured to capture infrared light while another may be configured to capture ultraviolet light. As contemplated herein, a camera is any device that is capable of capturing location information of the environment in which the vehicle is traveling.
In an embodiment, the on-board computer may be permanently installed into the vehicle. In such an embodiment, the computer may be dedicated for use with the present disclosure.
In an embodiment, the computer fetches data from the camera and generates a response map. The on-board computer fetches data from the database to create a lane map. The on-board computer compares the response map against the lane map to determine a score. If the score is below a predetermined threshold, the on-board computer updates the vehicle position. In an embodiment, the system may output the updated location information to another on-board system. Such a system may be an automated self-driving system that steers the vehicles. In another embodiment, such a system may also be an ADAS.
In another exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure and with reference to
In another exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure and with reference to
In another exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure and with reference to
In another exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure and with reference to
In another exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure and with continued reference to
In another exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure and with reference to
In another exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure and with reference to
In another exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure and with reference to
In another exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure and with continued reference to
In another exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure and with reference to
In another exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure and with reference to
In another exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure and with reference to
In another exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure and with continued reference to
In another exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure and with reference to
In another exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure and with reference to
In another exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure and with reference to
At step 230, the system utilizes a camera installed on the vehicle. In one embodiment, the camera is installed on the vehicle having a predetermined viewing angle and orientation. For example, the camera is installed on the roof of the vehicle, centered on the vehicle's centerline, and pointing in the direction of travel, i.e., forward. The camera captures an image of the region in front of the vehicle. In another embodiment, the camera may capture video and/or photographic images at a predetermined frame rate. In another embodiment, the camera captures infrared and/or ultraviolet light. In one embodiment, the camera captures images at a predetermined rate. In another example, the camera captures images at a rate of at least 10 images per second.
At step 240, the system generates a response map based on information fetched from the camera. The response map may be generated in real-time or in near real-time. The response map may be generated on a predetermined interval, for example, 20 times per second. In one embodiment, the system uses an image fetched from the camera and identifies lane markers within the lanes of vehicle travel depicted in the image. The camera may identify other aspects of the roadway including, but not limited to, bridges, signs, barriers, street lights, and buildings. In one embodiment, the computer comprises computer-executable code configured to detect permanent and/or semi-permanent structures within a two-dimensional image. In such an embodiment, the computer analyzes the image captured from the camera and identifies lane indicators such as painted lines and reflectors. The computer may also identify other structures such as bridges, signs, barriers, street lights, and buildings. The computer may generate a response map on a predetermined interval. In one embodiment, the computer generates a response map at least ten times per second.
At step 250, the system generates the vehicle's predicted location and calculates a confidence score for determining the vehicle's lateral position within a lane. For example, the system determines the predicted location by comparing the region map against the response map. In such an embodiment, the system samples various points within the region map identifying lanes of vehicle travel. The system samples the response map and identifies lanes of travel depicted therein. The system then compares this sampled region map to the response map and generates the vehicle's predicted location based on the differences in the perspectives of the region and response maps. In such an embodiment, the system takes the GPS/IMU information, the region map, and the response map as arguments in calculating the vehicle's predicted location. For example, if the region map is substantially the same as the response map but skewed to the left, the system's comparison recognizes the vehicle's actual position must be to the right of the GPS location. The system generates a predicted vehicle location based those differences.
In another embodiment, at step 250, the system calculates a confidence score.
Additionally, the system may generate the vehicle's predicted location. In one embodiment, for example, where the region map and the response map are identical, the system generates a confidence score of 1.000. In such an example, the environment data was gathered using a collection vehicle that was located at the same physical location with the same orientation of that of the system's vehicle. The confidence score reflects the system's confidence in the vehicle's predicted position compared to its position according to the region map, relative to the vehicle's lateral position within a lane. For example, a score of 1.000 correlates to a confidence of 100% and a score of 0.000 correlates to a confidence of 0%.
At step 260, the system outputs a predicted location. In one embodiment, the system may output the predicted location to an automated self-driving system. In another embodiment, the system may output the predicted location to an ADAS. In another embodiment, the system may output a corrected location if the confidence score is below a predetermined threshold. For example, the score threshold is set at 0.900. If the system generates a confidence score of anything less than 0.900, for example, a score of 0.85, the system generates a corrected location based on the comparison of the sampled region map and the response map. In an embodiment, the mathematical variance may be used as a confidence score. Further, if the system generates a confidence score of, for example, 0.950, the system outputs the vehicle's position as determined by the GPS/IMU information. In another embodiment, the system outputs the corrected location to an ADAS and/or an automated self-driving system. In another embodiment, the mathematical variance is used as the confidence score. Additionally, the system may reinput the vehicle's predicted location to be used in a subsequent iteration of the recited method, i.e., the result may be used in step 210.
In another exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure and with reference to
The Temporal Module utilizes the vehicle's previously determined position, in combination with the vehicle's speed and direction to predict the vehicle's instantaneous location. The Localization Module utilizes visual information gathered from a plurality of cameras to predict the vehicle's location. The steps in the Localization Module, steps 340 through 380, are performed for each camera incorporated into the system. For example, in a system comprising three separate cameras, the present disclosure may comprise three separate Localization Modules performing the recited steps. Any number of cameras may be utilized without departing from the embodiments contemplated herein.
In the Temporal Module, at step 310, the vehicle's location is fetched from a GPS and/or an IMU device. At step 320, the elapsed time from between the vehicle's previous determined location and the instant determination is fetched. At step 330, the vehicle's instantaneous location is predicted. For example, if the vehicle had an average speed of 50 miles per hour (73.33 ft/sec) in a given direction and only 0.10 seconds have elapsed since the vehicle's position was last determined, the result of the Temporal Module, as performed in step 330, would be that the vehicle's instantaneous location is 7.333 ft further in the direction of travel, as compared to the vehicle's previous location.
In the Localization Module, at step 340, the vehicle's approximate location is fetched from a GPS and/or an IMU device. With the vehicle's GPS/IMU location, a region map is generated in step 350. At step 360, visual information is fetched from a camera and, in step 370, a response map in generated. At step 380, the Localization Module compares the region map against the response map to predict the vehicle's location. Additionally, at step 380, the system may generate a confidence score.
At step 390, the vehicle's instantaneous location is updated vis-à-vis the vehicle's location retrieved from a GPS and/or IMU device in steps 310 and/or 340. The system fuses the results of the Temporal Module, as obtained in step 330, and the results of the Localization Module, as obtained in step 380, to predict the vehicle's location. This prediction may then be used to predict the vehicle's location in the next iteration of the recited method, that is, used in steps 310 and 340. At step 395, the system may output the results of the vehicle's location obtained in step 390 to another system, such as an ADAS.
In one embodiment, the computer 160 comprises computer-executable, non-transient code configured to detect certain elements with an image. For example, the computer 160 recognizes lane markings within a roadway including painted solid lines 301, painted striped lines 303, and reflectors 302. The system generates the response map as a series points, culminating a lane marking lines 311. The response map represents the road ahead of the vehicle, viewed from the camera 150 and perceived by the computer 160. In other embodiments, the lane markings 311 reflect other structural components such as bridges, signs, and barriers (not shown).
In another embodiment, the system determines a confidence score based on the differences in the lane map, which is shown in the top-left corner. For example, a perfect match overlays with 100% accuracy, resulting in a score of 1.000 (not shown). In another example, the system may determine a score of 0.74 where the overlay is a 74% match (as shown). In such an embodiment, the overlay is close, but the region map points 322 differs from the points from the response map lines 321 at some, but not all of the region map points 322. In such an embodiment, the score threshold may be 0.90, and in such an instance, the system would output a predicted vehicle location by analyzing the differences in the lane map. In another embodiment, the system may also determine other statistical parameters, such as the variance. In such an embodiment, the variance is calculated, for example, of 0.384 (as shown). For example, a logistic function may be used to calculate the variance, such as:
where,
xmin=the minimum value
xmax=the maximum value
S=the steepness
G=the growth rate
x=the matching score of the response map
m=the midpoint
Although a lane marking localization system has been shown and described, lane marking localization systems may be implemented according to other embodiments of the disclosure. For example, the system may utilize a plurality of cameras or other information gathering devices such as radar or LIDAR. Other embodiments of the disclosure may utilize a plurality of external or internal databases, on which relevant information is stored. Other embodiments also include those that output information to vehicle driving aids such as navigation and ADAS systems.
In an embodiment of the disclosure, the methodologies and techniques described herein are implemented on a special purpose computer programmed to determine lane marking and relative vehicle position. In an embodiment of the disclosure, the special-purpose computer comprises an embedded system with a dedicated processor equipped as part of a vehicle. In other embodiments, some or all of the components of the present disclosure may be integrated as part of a mobile device, for example, a cell phone or a tablet. The disclosure has been described herein using specific embodiments for the purposes of illustration only. It will be readily apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art, however, that the principles of the disclosure can be embodied in other ways. Therefore, the disclosure should not be regarded as being limited in scope to the specific embodiments disclosed herein, but instead as being fully commensurate in scope with the following claims.
This patent application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/184,926, titled “LANE MARKING LOCALIZATION AND FUSION,” filed on Nov. 8, 2018, which in turn is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/896,077, titled “LANE MARKING LOCALIZATION,” filed on Feb. 14, 2018, both of which are hereby incorporated reference herein in their entirety for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6084870 | Wooten et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6263088 | Crabtree et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6594821 | Banning et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6777904 | Degner et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6975923 | Spriggs | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7103460 | Breed | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7689559 | Canright et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7742841 | Sakai et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7783403 | Breed | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7844595 | Canright et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8041111 | Wilensky | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8064643 | Stein et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8082101 | Stein et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8164628 | Stein et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8175376 | Marchesotti et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8271871 | Marchesotti | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8346480 | Trepagnter et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8378851 | Stein et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8392117 | Dolgov et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8401292 | Park et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8412449 | Trepagnter et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8478072 | Aisaka et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8553088 | Stein et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8706394 | Trepagnter et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8718861 | Montemerlo et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
8788134 | Litkouht et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8908041 | Stein et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8917169 | Schofield et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8963913 | Baek | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8965621 | Urmson et al. | Feb 2015 | B1 |
8981966 | Stein et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8983708 | Choe et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8993951 | Schofield et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9002632 | Emigh | Apr 2015 | B1 |
9008369 | Schofield et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9025880 | Perazzi et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9042648 | Wang et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9081385 | Ferguson et al. | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9088744 | Grauer et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9111444 | Kaganovich | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9117133 | Barnes et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9118816 | Stein et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9120485 | Dolgov | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9122954 | Srebnik et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9134402 | Sebastian et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9145116 | Clarke et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9147255 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9156473 | Clarke et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9176006 | Stein | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9179072 | Stein et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9183447 | Gdalyahu et al. | Nov 2015 | B1 |
9185360 | Stein et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9191634 | Schofield et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9214084 | Grauer et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9219873 | Grauer et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9233659 | Rosenbaum et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9233688 | Clarke et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9248832 | Huberman | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9248835 | Tanzmeister | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9251708 | Rosenbaum et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9277132 | Berberian | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9280711 | Stein | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9282144 | Iebay et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9286522 | Stein et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9297641 | Stein | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9299004 | Lin et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9315192 | Zhu et al. | Apr 2016 | B1 |
9317033 | Ibanez-Guzman et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9317776 | Honda et al. | Apr 2016 | B1 |
9330334 | Lin et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9342074 | Dolgov et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9347779 | Lynch | May 2016 | B1 |
9355635 | Gao et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9365214 | Ben Shalom et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9399397 | Mizutani et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9418549 | Kang et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9428192 | Schofield et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9436880 | Bos et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9438878 | Niebla et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9443163 | Springer | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9446765 | Ben Shalom et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9459515 | Stein | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9466006 | Duan | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9476970 | Fairfield | Oct 2016 | B1 |
9483839 | Kwon et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9490064 | Hirosawa et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9494935 | Okumura et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9507346 | Levinson et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9513634 | Pack et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9531966 | Stein et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9535423 | Debreczeni | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9538113 | Grauer et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9547985 | Tuukkanen | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9549158 | Grauer et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9552657 | Ueno | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9555803 | Pawlicki et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9568915 | Berntorp et al. | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9587952 | Slusar | Mar 2017 | B1 |
9599712 | Van Der Tempel et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9600889 | Boisson et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9602807 | Crane et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9612123 | Levinson et al. | Apr 2017 | B1 |
9620010 | Grauer et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9625569 | Lange | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9628565 | Stenneth et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9649999 | Amireddy et al. | May 2017 | B1 |
9652860 | Maali et al. | May 2017 | B1 |
9669827 | Ferguson et al. | Jun 2017 | B1 |
9672446 | Vallespi-Gonzalez | Jun 2017 | B1 |
9690290 | Prokhorov | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9701023 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9712754 | Grauer et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9720418 | Stenneth | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9723097 | Harris et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9723099 | Chen et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9723233 | Grauer et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9726754 | Massanell et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9729860 | Cohen et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9738280 | Rayes | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9739609 | Lewis | Aug 2017 | B1 |
9746550 | Nath et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9753128 | Schweizer et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9753141 | Grauer et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9754490 | Kentley et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9760837 | Nowozin et al. | Sep 2017 | B1 |
9766625 | Boroditsky et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9769456 | You et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9773155 | Shotton et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9779276 | Todeschtni et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9785149 | Wang et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9805294 | Liu et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9810785 | Grauer et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9823339 | Cohen | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9842399 | Yamaguchi | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9953236 | Huang et al. | Apr 2018 | B1 |
10147193 | Huang et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10223806 | Luo et al. | Mar 2019 | B1 |
10223807 | Luo et al. | Mar 2019 | B1 |
10410055 | Wang et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10529089 | Ahmad et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10698100 | Becker | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10816354 | Liu | Oct 2020 | B2 |
20010051845 | Itoh | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20030114980 | Klausner et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030174773 | Comaniciu et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040264763 | Mas et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20070088497 | Jung | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070183661 | El-Maleh et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070183662 | Wang et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070230792 | Shashua et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070286526 | Abousleman et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080109118 | Schwartz | May 2008 | A1 |
20080249667 | Horvitz et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090040054 | Wang et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090087029 | Coleman et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090243825 | Schofield | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100049397 | Liu et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100082238 | Nakamura | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100111417 | Ward et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100226564 | Marchesotti et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100281361 | Marchesotti | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110142283 | Huang et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110206282 | Aisaka et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110247031 | Jacoby | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120041636 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120105639 | Stein et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120120069 | Kodaira | May 2012 | A1 |
20120140076 | Rosenbaum et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120274629 | Baek | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120314070 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130051613 | Bobbitt et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130083959 | Owechko et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130182134 | Grundmann et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130204465 | Phillips et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130266187 | Bulan et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130329052 | Chew | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140063489 | Steffey | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140072170 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140104051 | Breed | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140142799 | Ferguson et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140143839 | Ricci | May 2014 | A1 |
20140145516 | Hirosawa et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140198184 | Stein et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140314322 | Snavely et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140321704 | Partis | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140334668 | Saund | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150062304 | Stein et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150127239 | Breed | May 2015 | A1 |
20150253428 | Holz | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150269437 | Maruyama et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150269438 | Samarasekera et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150292891 | Kojo | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150310370 | Burry et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150353082 | Lee et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160008988 | Kennedy et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160026787 | Nairn et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160037064 | Stein et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160046290 | Aharony et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160094774 | Li et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160118080 | Chen | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160125608 | Sorstedt | May 2016 | A1 |
20160129907 | Kim et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160165157 | Stein et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160191860 | Jung | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160210528 | Duan | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160275766 | Venetianer et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160321381 | English et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160321817 | Ratcliff | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160334230 | Ross et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160342837 | Hong et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160347322 | Clarke et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160375907 | Erban | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170053169 | Cuban et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170061632 | Lindner et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170124476 | Levinson et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170134631 | Zhao et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170177951 | Yang et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170227647 | Baik | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170301104 | Qian | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170305423 | Green | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170318407 | Meister et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170363423 | Dormody | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180005407 | Browning | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180111274 | Seok | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180131924 | Jung | May 2018 | A1 |
20180149739 | Becker | May 2018 | A1 |
20180151063 | Pun et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180158197 | Dasgupta et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180188043 | Chen | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180216943 | Hawkins | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180260956 | Huang et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180268566 | Houts | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180283892 | Behrendt | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180284278 | Russell | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180312125 | Jung | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180315201 | Cameron | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180364717 | Douillard | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180373254 | Song | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180373980 | Huval | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190025853 | Julian | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190063945 | Liu | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190065863 | Luo et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190066329 | Luo et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190066330 | Luo et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190108384 | Wang et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190132391 | Thomas et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190132392 | Liu et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190163989 | Guo | May 2019 | A1 |
20190210564 | Han et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190210613 | Sun et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190226851 | Nicosevici | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190236950 | Li et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190266420 | Ge et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190271549 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190312993 | Yamashita et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190339084 | Korenaga | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20200089973 | Efland | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200271473 | Wang et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20210183099 | Fujii et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210373161 | Lu et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102815305 | Dec 2012 | CN |
105667518 | Jun 2016 | CN |
105825173 | Aug 2016 | CN |
106340197 | Jan 2017 | CN |
106781591 | May 2017 | CN |
106909876 | Jun 2017 | CN |
107111742 | Aug 2017 | CN |
108010360 | May 2018 | CN |
111256693 | Jun 2020 | CN |
2608513 | Sep 1977 | DE |
0890470 | Jan 1999 | EP |
1754179 | Feb 2007 | EP |
2448251 | May 2012 | EP |
2463843 | Jun 2012 | EP |
2761249 | Aug 2014 | EP |
2918974 | Sep 2015 | EP |
2946336 | Nov 2015 | EP |
2993654 | Mar 2016 | EP |
3081419 | Oct 2016 | EP |
3819673 | May 2021 | EP |
2017198566 | Nov 2017 | JP |
100802511 | Feb 2008 | KR |
20170065083 | Jun 2017 | KR |
1991009375 | Jun 1991 | WO |
2005098739 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2005098751 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2005098782 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2010109419 | Sep 2010 | WO |
2013045612 | Apr 2013 | WO |
2014111814 | Jul 2014 | WO |
2014166245 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2014201324 | Dec 2014 | WO |
2015083009 | Jun 2015 | WO |
2015103159 | Jul 2015 | WO |
2015125022 | Aug 2015 | WO |
2015186002 | Dec 2015 | WO |
2016090282 | Jun 2016 | WO |
2016135736 | Sep 2016 | WO |
2017013875 | Jan 2017 | WO |
2017079349 | May 2017 | WO |
2017079460 | May 2017 | WO |
2018132608 | Jul 2018 | WO |
2019040800 | Feb 2019 | WO |
2019084491 | May 2019 | WO |
2019084494 | May 2019 | WO |
2019140277 | Jul 2019 | WO |
2019161134 | Aug 2019 | WO |
2019168986 | Sep 2019 | WO |
2020038118 | Feb 2020 | WO |
2020097512 | May 2020 | WO |
2021017213 | Feb 2021 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Harry Y. Oh, U.S. Appl. No. 15/896,077, Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 13, 2020, pp. 1-21. |
Harry Y. Oh, U.S. Appl. No. 15/896,077, Final Office Action dated Jul. 9, 2020, pp. 1-30. |
Harry Y. Oh, U.S. Appl. No. 15/896,077, Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 1, 2020, pp. 1-34. |
International application No. PCT/US2019/060547 International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Jun. 25, 2020, pp. 1-23. |
Carle, Patrick J.F., “Global Rover Localization by Matching Lidar and Orbital 3D Maps.”, IEEE, Anchorage Convention Distriction, pp. 1-6, May 3-8, 2010. (Anchorage Alaska, US), May 3-8, 2019. |
Young, Lee W., International Application No. PCT/US19/18113 Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 8, 2019. (pp. 1-13). |
Caselitz, T. et al., “Monocular camera localization in 3D LiDAR maps,” European Conference on Computer Vision (2014) Computer Vision—ECCV 2014. ECCV 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8690. Springer, Cham. |
Mur-Artal, R. et al., “ORB-SLAM: A Versatile and Accurate Monocular SLAM System,” IEEE Transaction on Robotics, Oct. 2015, pp. 1147-1163, vol. 31, No. 5, Spain. |
Sattler, T. et al., “Are Large-Scale 3D Models Really Necessary for Accurate Visual Localization?” CVPR, IEEE, 2017, pp. 1-10. |
Engel J., et al., LSD-SLAM: Large-Scale Direct Monocular SLAM. In: Fleet D., Pajdla T., Schiele B., Tuytelaars T. (eds) Computer Vision—ECCV 2014. ECCV 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8690. Springer, Cham. |
Levinson, Jesse et al., Experimental Robotics, Unsupervised Calibration for Mult-iBeam Lasers, pp. 179-194, 12th Ed., Oussama Khatib, Vijay Kumar, Gaurav Sukhatme (Eds.) Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014. |
International Application No. PCT/US2019/013322, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 2, 2019. |
International Application No. PCT/US19/12934, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 29, 2019. |
International Application No. PCT/US18/53795, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 31, 2018. |
International Application No. PCT/US18/57484, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 7, 2019. |
International Application No. PCT/US2018/057851, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 1, 2019. |
International Application No. PCT/US2019/019839, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 23, 2019. |
International Application No. PCT/US19/25995, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 9, 2019. |
Geiger, Andreas et al., “Automatic Camera and Range Sensor Calibration using a single Shot”, Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 1-8, 2012 IEEE International Conference. |
Zhang, Z. et al. A Flexible new technique for camera calibration. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (vol. 22, Issue: 11, Nov. 2000). |
International Application No. PCT/US2018/047830, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 27, 2017. |
Bar-Hillel, Aharon et al. “Recent progress in road and lane detection: a survey.” Machine Vision and Applications 25 (2011): 727-745. |
Schindler, Andreas et al. “Generation of high precision digital maps using circular arc splines,” 2012 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Alcala de Henares, 2012, pp. 246-251. doi: 10.1109/IVS.2012.6232124. |
International Application No. PCT/US2018/047608, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 28, 2018. |
Hou, Xiaodi and Zhang, Liqing, “Saliency Detection: A Spectral Residual Approach”, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR'07—IEEE Conference, pp. 1-8, 2007. |
Hou, Xiaodi and Harel, Jonathan and Koch, Christof, “Image Signature: Highlighting Sparse Salient Regions”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 194-201, 2012. |
Hou, Xiaodi and Zhang, Liqing, “Dynamic Visual Attention: Searching For Coding Length Increments”, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 21, pp. 681-688, 2008. |
Li, Yin and Hou, Xiaodi and Koch, Christof and Rehg, James M. and Yuille, Alan L., “The Secrets of Salient Object Segmentation”, Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 280-287, 2014. |
Zhou, Bolei and Hou, Xiaodi and Zhang, Liqing, “A Phase Discrepancy Analysis of Object Motion”, Asian Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 225-238, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010. |
Hou, Xiaodi and Yuille, Alan and Koch, Christof, “Boundary Detection Benchmarking Beyond F-Measures”, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR'13, vol. 2013, pp. 1-8, IEEE, 2013. |
Hou, Xiaodi and Zhang, Liqing, “Color Conceptualization”, Proceedings of the 15th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 265-268, ACM, 2007. |
Hou, Xiaodi and Zhang, Liqing, “Thumbnail Generation Based on Global Saliency”, Advances in Cognitive Neurodynamics, ICCN 2007, pp. 999-1003, Springer Netherlands, 2008. |
Hou, Xiaodi and Yuille, Alan and Koch, Christof, “A Meta-Theory of Boundary Detection Benchmarks”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1302.5985, 2013. |
Li, Yanghao and Wang, Naiyan and Shi, Jianping and Liu, Laying and Hou, Xiaodi, “Revisiting Batch Normalization for Practical Domain Adaptation”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.04779, 2016. |
Li, Yanghao and Wang, Naiyan and Liu, Laying and Hou, Xiaodi, “Demystifying Neural Style Transfer”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.01036, 2017. |
Hou, Xiaodi and Zhang, Liqing, “A Time-Dependent Model of Information Capacity of Visual Attention”, International Conference on Neural Information Processing, pp. 127-136, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2006. |
Wang, Panqu and Chen, Pengfei and Yuan, Ye and Liu, Ding and Huang, Zehua and Hou, Xiaodi and Cottrell, Garrison, “Understanding Convolution for Semantic Segmentation”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08502, 2017. |
Li, Yanghao and Wang, Naiyan and Liu, Laying and Hou, Xiaodi, “Factorized Bilinear Models for Image Recognition”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.05709, 2016. |
Hou, Xiaodi, “Computational Modeling and Psychophysics in Low and Mid-Level Vision”, California Institute of Technology, 2014. |
Spinello, Luciano, Triebel, Rudolph, Siegwart, Roland, “Multiclass Multimodal Detection and Tracking in Urban Environments”, Sage Journals, vol. 29 Issue 12, pp. 1498-1515 Article first published online: Oct. 7, 2010; Issue published: Oct. 1, 2010. |
Matthew Barth, Carrie Malcolm, Theodore Younglove, and Nicole Hill, “Recent Validation Efforts for a Comprehensive Modal Emissions Model”, Transportation Research Record 1750, Paper No. 01-0326, College of Engineering, Center for Environmental Research and Technology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, date unknown. |
Kyoungho Ahn, Hesham Rakha, “The Effects of Route Choice Decisions on Vehicle Energy Consumption and Emissions”, Virginia Tech Transportation Institute, Blacksburg, VA 24061, date unknown. |
Ramos, Sebastian, Gehrig, Stefan, Pinggera, Peter, Franke, Uwe, Rother, Carsten, “Detecting Unexpected Obstacles for Self-Driving Cars: Fusing Deep Learning and Geometric Modeling”, arXiv:1612.06573v1 [cs.CV] Dec. 20, 2016. |
Schroff, Florian, Dmitry Kalenichenko, James Philbin, (Google), “FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clustering”, CVPR 2015. |
Dai, Jifeng, Kaiming He, Jian Sun, (Microsoft Research), “Instance-aware Semantic Segmentation via Multi-task Network Cascades”, CVPR 2016. |
Huval, Brody, Tao Wang, Sameep Tandon, Jeff Kiske, Will Song, Joel Pazhayampallil, Mykhaylo Andriluka, Pranav Rajpurkar, Toki Migimatsu, Royce Cheng-Yue, Fernando Mujica, Adam Coates, Andrew Y. Ng, “An Empirical Evaluation of Deep Learning on Highway Driving”, arXiv:1504.01716v3 [cs.RO] Apr. 17, 2015. |
Tian Li, “Proposal Free Instance Segmentation Based on Instance-aware Metric”, Department of Computer Science, Cranberry-Lemon University, Pittsburgh, PA., date unknown. |
Mohammad Norouzi, David J. Fleet, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, “Hamming Distance Metric Learning”, Departments of Computer Science and Statistics, University of Toronto, date unknown. |
Jain, Suyong Dutt, Grauman, Kristen, “Active Image Segmentation Propagation”, In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, Jun. 2016. |
MacAodha, Oisin, Campbell, Neill D.F., Kautz, Jan, Brostow, Gabriel J., “Hierarchical Subquery Evaluation for Active Learning on a Graph”, In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2014. |
Kendall, Alex, Gal, Yarin, “What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision”, arXiv:1703.04977v1 [cs.CV] Mar. 15, 2017. |
Wei, Junqing, John M. Dolan, Bakhtiar Litkhouhi, “A Prediction- and Cost Function-Based Algorithm for Robust Autonomous Freeway Driving”, 2010 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA, Jun. 21-24, 2010. |
Peter Welinder, Steve Branson, Serge Belongie, Pietro Perona, “The Multidimensional Wisdom of Crowds” http://www.vision.caltech.edu/visipedia/papers/WelinderEtaINIPS10.pdf, 2010. |
C. Yang, Z. Li, R. Cui and B. Xu, “Neural Network-Based Motion Control of an Underactuated Wheeled Inverted Pendulum Model,” in IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 25, No. 11, pp. 2004-2016, Nov. 2014. |
Stephan R. Richter, Vibhav Vineet, Stefan Roth, Vladlen Koltun, “Playing for Data: Ground Truth from Computer Games”, Intel Labs, European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 2016. |
Thanos Athanasiadis, Phivos Mylonas, Yannis Avrithis, and Stefanos Kollias, “Semantic Image Segmentation and Object Labeling”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 17, No. 3, Mar. 2007. |
Marius Cordts, Mohamed Omran, Sebastian Ramos, Timo Rehfeld, Markus Enzweiler Rodrigo Benenson, Uwe Franke, Stefan Roth, and Bernt Schiele, “The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understanding”, Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, Nevada, 2016. |
Adhiraj Somani, Nan Ye, David Hsu, and Wee Sun Lee, “DESPOT: Online POMDP Planning with Regularization”, Department of Computer Science, National University of Singapore, date unknown. |
Adam Paszke, Abhishek Chaurasia, Sangpil Kim, and Eugenio Culurciello. Enet: A deep neural network architecture for real-time semantic segmentation. CoRR, abs/1606.02147, 2016. |
Szeliski, Richard, “Computer Vision: Algorithms and Applications” http://szeliski.org/Book/, 2010. |
Office Action Mailed in Chinese Application No. 201810025516.X, dated Sep. 3, 2019. |
Luo, Yi et al. U.S. Appl. No. 15/684,389 Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 9, 2019. |
Kai Yu, Yang Zhou, Da Li, Zhang Zhang, Kaiqi Huang, “Large-scale Distributed Video Parsing and Evaluation Platform”, Center for Research on Intelligent Perception and Computing, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China, arXiv:1611.09580v1 [cs.CV] Nov. 29, 2016. |
P. Guarneri, G. Rocca and M. Gobbi, “A Neural-Network-Based Model for the Dynamic Simulation of the Tire/ Suspension System While Traversing Road Irregularities,” in IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 19, No. 9, pp. 1549-1563, Sep. 2008. |
Harry Y. Oh, U.S. Appl. No. 16/184,926, Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 5, 2020, pp. 1-17. |
Mingdong Wang et al., U.S. Appl. No. 16/184,926 Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 15, 2021, pp. 1-5. |
Chinese Patent Office, First Search Report for CN 201980013350.2, dated Feb. 21, 2022, 3 pages with machine translation. |
Chinese Patent Office, First Office Action for CN 201980013350.2, dated Feb. 25, 2022, 20 pages with machine translation. |
Extended European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 18849237.5, dated Apr. 23, 2021. |
Extended European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 21166828.0, dated Aug. 5, 2021 (8 pages). |
Gurghian, A., et al., “DeepLanes: End-To-End Lane Position Estimation using Deep Neural Networks”, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, pp. 38-45. |
Nguyen, Trung Bao, “Evaluation of Lane Detection Algorithms based on an Embedded Platform,” Jun. 30, 2017, Chapters 3 and 4, pp. 1-107; Master Thesis, Technische Universitat Chemnitz, Jun. 2017, available at https://nbnresolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:ch1-qucosa-226615. |
Niu, J., et al., “Robust Lane Detection using Two-stage Feature Extraction with Curve Fitting”, Pattern Recognition, Elsevier, 59, pp. 225-233 (2016). |
Narote, S., et al., “A review of recent advances in lane detection and departure warning system”, Pattern Recognition, Elsevier, 73, pp. 216-234 (2018). |
Examination Report from corresponding European Patent Application No. 21166828.0, dated Mar. 16, 2023 (8 pages). |
Xiao Zhongyang et al: “Monocular Vehicle Self-localization method based on Compact Semantic Map”, (2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), IEEE, Nov. 4, 2018, pp. 3083-3090. |
Siyuan Liu, U.S. Appl. No. 17/074,468 Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 7, 2022, p. 1-7. |
Chenzhe Qian, U.S. Appl. No. 17/225,396, Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 24, 2022, pp. 1-19. |
Chinese Patent Office, First Office Action for CN 201880055025.8, dated Dec. 16, 2022, 10 pages. |
Schindler, et al., “Generation of High Precision Digitial Maps using Circular Arc Splines,” 2012 Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Alcala de Henares, Spain, Jun. 3-7, 2012. |
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office, Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/308,803, dated Mar. 16, 2023, 25 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210278221 A1 | Sep 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16184926 | Nov 2018 | US |
Child | 17320888 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15896077 | Feb 2018 | US |
Child | 16184926 | US |