This invention relates to merging data words from a multi-lane serial bus to a parallel bus.
A system, such as a multiple integrated circuit (IC) device, may have both serial buses and parallel buses for the movement of data. Data may move along the buses in an asynchronous, “as required”, fashion. In consequence, data throughput on the buses can be uneven and highly variable. A high variability in throughput can be particularly problematic in mobile battery powered systems, where providing capability for peak data transfer events can place a significant load on the battery.
This invention seeks to provide an improved manner of coping with uneven data throughput demands on a system having serial and parallel buses.
A buffer is associated with each of a plurality of data lanes of a multi-lane serial data bus. Data words are timed through the buffers of active ones of the data lanes. Words timed through buffers of active data lanes are merged onto a parallel bus such that data words from each of the active data lanes are merged onto the parallel bus in a pre-defined repeating sequence of data lanes. This approach allows other, non-active, data lanes to remain in a power conservation state.
Other features and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following description in conjunction with the drawings.
In the figures which illustrate example embodiments of the invention,
Data moving through a system asynchronously is typically transmitted as data packets. A data packet typically has a packet header followed by payload data. In some systems, packets end with a packet footer. The packet header typically includes a destination address for the packet, and may also include other information. The data of the header, payload, and any footer is typically organized as data words, with each data word typically being a data byte, each byte comprising a fixed number of bits (for example, eight bits).
Turning to
Transmitter 16 is detailed in
Receiver 20 is detailed in
In a quiescent state, each of the data lane controllers 46 and 56 may be in a power conservation state.
In operation, referencing
Clock 40 clocks the data bytes through the FIFO buffers 36. When the leading data byte in a FIFO buffer for a data lane reaches the head of the FIFO buffer, the FIFO buffer sends a transmit request to its associated data lane controller 46 on control path 48. The data lane controller 46 then returns a transmit acknowledge signal whereupon data bytes are clocked out of the FIFO buffer 36 to the data lane of the multi-lane serial bus 18.
It will be appreciated that due to the variability of the various devices in the system, there will be variability in the timing of the receipt of each transmit acknowledge signal such that the clock cycle during which a FIFO buffer 36 may begin clocking out data bytes to a data lane is not deterministic.
For example, it may be that data lanes I, II, and III are chosen as the active lanes for a data transmission. The transmit controller 32 therefore controls the lane distributor 34 to output the first data byte to buffer 36-I, the second byte to buffer 36-II, the third to buffer 36-III, and so on in repeating sequence. Since the data is timed through each of the buffers using the same clock, normally, the first data byte sent to buffer 36-I would be the first to arrive at the head of any of the buffers 36. Once this occurs, buffer 36-I sends a transmit request to data lane controller 46-I. Shortly thereafter, a first byte in buffer 36-II may arrive at the head of buffer 36-II and this buffer will then send a transmit request. Likely after a further short interval, a first byte in buffer 36-III may arrive at the head of buffer 36-III and this buffer will then send a transmit request. Due to inherent variability in the system, it may be that a transmit acknowledge signal is returned first by data lane controller 36-II, second by data lane controller 36-III, and lastly by data lane controller 36-I. As soon as a buffer receives the expected transmit acknowledge signal, it begins transmitting bytes to its lane via its data lane controller. Thus, pursuing this example, bytes first begin appearing on data lane II, then on data lane III, and lastly on data lane I.
Transmit controller 32 sends an indication of the active data lanes to the receiver on control path 42. Turning to
Pursuing the foregoing example, likely a data byte on data lane II is the first to arrive at the head of any of the buffers. Once this data byte arrives at the head of buffer 66-II, buffer 66-II sends a ready signal to the receive controller 52. A first data byte on data lane III likely next arrives at the head of its buffer 66-Ill and buffer 66-III then sends a ready signal; lastly, a first data byte on lane I arrives at the head of its buffer 66-I. Once the receive controller 52 has received a ready signal from all active lanes, it first prompts buffer 66-I to send a byte to lane merger 54, then prompts buffer 66-II to send a byte to the lane merger, then prompts buffer 66-Ill to send a byte, then prompts buffer 66-I to send another byte, and so on such that the bytes outgoing from the receiver on parallel bus 22 (as one parallel data byte at a time) have the same order as those that arrived at the transmitter on parallel bus 14 (
In an alternate embodiment, the receive controller may not wait for a ready signal from the buffer of each of the active data lanes. Instead, as soon as it receives a ready signal from the buffer for a data lane which is next in the required cyclical pattern, it can prompt this buffer to send a data byte to the lane merger 54. For example, assuming again that data bytes are to be multiplexed in the repeating sequence of lanes I, II, III, and IV, and assuming data lanes I, II, III, and IV were active, then if buffer 66-II was the first to send a ready signal, the receive controller would log this but not respond. If buffer 66-I was the next to send a ready signal, then the receive controller could immediately prompt buffer 66-I to send a first data byte to the lane merger, and immediately thereafter prompt buffer 66-II to send a data byte to the lane merger, regardless of whether or not a ready signal had yet been received by the controller from buffer 66-III.
After the last data byte distributed to a particular data lane reaches a given receive data lane buffer 66, subsequent bytes will be segments of the end of transmission indicator inserted into the data lane at the transmitter. These end of transmission indicator bytes are passed to the lane merger. When the transmitter returns its data lanes to a low power state, it may signal the receiver controller 52 which may then place the active receiver data lane controllers 56 in a low power state. Alternatively, each active receive data controller could sense the transition of its data lane to a low power state and drop to a low power state.
When bytes clocked onto parallel bus 22 begin arriving at data sink 24, the sink needs some manner of parsing the bytes to identify the (variable length) packets in the byte stream. This may be accomplished in several ways. In a first approach, packets could be prepared at data source 12 so that each has a packet footer with a characteristic signature denoting the end of the packet. Alternatively, each packet header could have a characteristic signature so that a header may be recognised as such and this information used to identify the end of the preceding packet. Thirdly, the header of each packet could include a byte count indicative of the number of bytes in the payload (and any footer) of the packet. If system 10 operates in this third fashion, then when bytes begin arriving at data sink 24, the sink will know that the first bytes to arrive represent the header of the first packet and that a set of one or more bytes in a pre-defined position of the header includes a byte count. The sink can extract the byte count to establish the end of the first packet. This may then be repeated for each subsequent packet.
As described, the transmitter operates such that certain non-payload data, specifically, an end of transmission bit stream, follows the last packet of a transmission. This non-payload data could additionally comprise, for example, certain control information not intended for the data sink 24. One mechanism to ensure the data sink does not mistake this non-payload data as payload-bearing packets is as follows. Where the header of each payload-bearing packet includes a byte count, the data sink (or the lane merger 54, or any component between the lane merger and the data sink) will recognise the end of each packet. The bytes after the last payload-bearing packet may be expected to be recognised as not comprising a valid packet header. As such, the data sink will recognise the end of the stream of payload-bearing packets. In consequence, after recognising the end of the last payload-bearing packet, the data sink will simply ignore (or drop) any bytes that follow this.
The data sink could be a separate device or integrated with the receiver. If integrated with the receiver, the data sink could be a hardware, firmware, or software construct. Similarly, the data source could be a separate device or integrated with the transmitter. If integrated with the transmitter, the data source could be a hardware, firmware, or software construct.
While the example embodiment shows four data lanes, of course a system may equally have a different number of data lanes. Also, while the example cyclical pattern was an ascending sequence of the ordinal indicators for active data lanes, equally a different cyclical pattern could be used. All that is required is that the same cyclical pattern be used at both the transmitter and the receiver.
While the control path 42 has been shown as a path which is separate from the data lanes, alternatively, a data lane could be used to implement the control path. Specifically, a given data lane could be designated for use in sending control information and such information could be sent after the end of a transmission. Thus, after the end of a transmission, the transmit controller could activate the designated data lane and send this control information to the receiver so that the receiver activates the appropriate data lanes for the next transmission.
Other modifications will be apparent to those skilled in the art and, therefore, the invention is defined in the claims.
The present application claims the benefit of prior provisional application Ser. No. 60/721,255, filed Sep. 28, 2005, the contents of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6363023 | Andersen et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6560240 | Borland et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6594714 | Swanson et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6697383 | Li et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6738068 | Cohen et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6760349 | Ho et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6886058 | Haren | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6907534 | Ku | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6993667 | Lo | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7136953 | Bisson et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7188263 | Rubinstein et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7200186 | Schoenborn | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7203853 | Martwick et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7283520 | Liao et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7409567 | Hammes et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
20020085415 | Baltar | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20050078673 | Sakamoto et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050078712 | Voutilainen | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050238055 | Frodsham et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060013207 | McMillen et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060023633 | Caruk et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060294279 | McKee et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070067548 | Juenger | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070294458 | Danilak | Dec 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070079047 A1 | Apr 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60721255 | Sep 2005 | US |