The present invention relates generally to the field of tools. The present invention relates specifically to a lanyard for connecting tools, or batteries, to an anchor point, for example, while working at height. Lanyards are used to attach to/support tools, batteries, components, and/or other equipment to provide security when an operator inadvertently drops the equipment. Lanyards also protect the tool or equipment from damage due to a fall.
One embodiment of the invention relates to a lanyard. The lanyard includes a first attachment member, a second attachment member, a sheath, and an elastic cord. The sheath includes a first end coupled to the first attachment member and a second end coupled to the second attachment member. The sheath defines an extended length between the first and second ends. The elastic cord has a first elastic cord end and a second elastic cord end. The first elastic cord end and the second elastic cord end are both attached to the first attachment member. The elastic cord defines a loop between the first attachment member and the second attachment member wherein the elastic cord is stretchable between an un-stretched length and stretched length. The un-stretched length is less than the extended length, wherein the elasticity of the sheath is less than the elasticity of the elastic cord.
Another embodiment of the invention relates to a lanyard. The lanyard includes a first attachment member, a second attachment member, a sheath, and four or more separate elastic cords. The sheath includes a first end coupled to the first attachment member and a second end coupled to the second attachment member. The sheath defines an extended length between the first and second ends. The four or more separate elastic cords are disposed within the sheath. Each elastic cord is coupled between the first attachment member and the second attachment member on opposite ends of the sheath. The elastic cord is stretchable between an un-stretched length and a stretched length. The un-stretched length is less than the extended length, such that the elasticity of the sheath is less than the elasticity of the elastic cords.
Another embodiment of the invention relates to a lanyard. The lanyard includes a tool holding member, a carabiner, a sheath, and one or more elastic cords. The sheath includes a first end coupled to the tool holding member and a second end coupled to the carabiner. The second end of the sheath is opposite the first end. The fully extended sheath defines a limiting tensioned length of the lanyard. One or more elastic cords are disposed within the sheath and couple to the tool holding member on a first end of the sheath and the carabiner at a second end of the sheath. The one or more elastic cords have a pre-tensioned length and a tensioned length. The tensioned length of the one or more elastic cords is less than or equal to the limiting tensioned length of the sheath. The limiting tensioned length of the sheath is between a 38% and 115% increase of the pre-tensioned length of the one or more elastic cords.
Alternative exemplary embodiments relate to other features and combinations of features as may be generally recited in the claims.
This application will become more fully understood from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying figures, wherein like reference numerals refer to like elements in which:
Referring generally to the figures, various embodiments of a lanyard are shown. Lanyards are used as a safety measure to secure tools to an anchor point, for example, while working at height. To enhance safety, a lanyard may couple to tools and tool batteries and tether them when operating the tools at height. Various regulations (e.g., OSHA regulations) may require a lanyard when an operator uses tools height. When a tool is dropped at height, the lanyard couples the tool to an anchor point and prevents the tool from dropping. This prevents a safety hazard and also protects the tool from the destructive influence of the fall.
Lanyards are designed to absorb and dissipate the energy of a fall. Lanyards that are too stiff may break or snap at the attachment points to either the tool or the anchor point or along the lanyard itself. Stiff lanyards allow a predetermined falling length, but often exhibit brittle material behavior and may break unexpectedly along the lanyard or at the attachment members. This brittle-like behavior is due to the stiff lanyards inability to absorb the energy of the falling object. Elastic materials show a far more ductile response to a falling object, but may not be effective in preventing an object from falling a specified distance. For example, a first object with a first weight will fall a different distance than a second object with a second weight when attached to the same elastic lanyard. Many factors, such as the height of the fall, the weight of the supported object, the spring constant of the elastic material, and others, determine the length of the deflection needed to support a falling object with an elastic lanyard. For a reliable lanyard, this unpredictability can be problematic.
Applicant has found that the use of a sheath of a stiff or inelastic material, such as nylon, surrounding an elastic material, such as natural rubber, creates a combination lanyard with the beneficial effects from both materials. The lanyard has a predictable limit to the total deflection defined by the total extended length of the inelastic sheath. In addition, the elastic properties of the cords within the lanyard absorb and dissipate most, if not all, the energy of the fall. This elastic energy dissipation prevents brittle-like fractures at the attachment points or along the sheath of the lanyard. The inelastic material reliably limits the fall distance.
One common attachment member at the ends of a lanyard is a carabiner. Carabiners can quickly attach to an anchor point, a tool, or a tool tether (coupled to or attached to the tool). Carabiners operate a gate in two positions, an open position and a closed position. In the open position, the carabiner may receive a loop or hook. Carabiners can be biased toward the closed position so that when the loop is received, the carabiner closes around the loop and prevents accidental release. However, often the loop is bigger than the gap or opening created by the carabiner, either between the gate and a first end of the carabiner or between the gate and the internal walls of the carabiner. This can cause binding of the loop within the carabiner and may prevent the carabiner from closing around the loop. Applicant has found that maintaining the distance between the gate and the internal walls of the carabiner to be greater than the distance between the gate and an end of the carabiner; lanyard binding is reduced. This is because there is more room for the lanyard loop once it passes through the gate (e.g., more room on the carabiner) than there is between the gate and the end of the carabiner.
As shown in
The sheath 14 can be made of nylon or other suitable materials. For example, sheath 14 may be made from natural fibers or wool, cashmere, cotton, silk, linen, hemp, and/or other natural fibers. Sheath 14 may be made from synthetic fibers such as rayon, polyester, acrylic, acetate, nylon, polyamides, and/or other polymers. In this application, “nylon” will refer to any member of the family of polyamides such as nylon 6,6; nylon 6; nylon 6,12; nylon 5,10; and other polyamides. The sheath 14 can be formed from a nylon sheet material or a composite material, e.g., nylon and rubber. The sheath 14 may be formed from less than eighty strands of nylon for every twenty strands of rubber. For example, the sheath 14 may be formed of seventy-four strands of nylon for every twenty-six strands of rubber. The sheath 14 may be formed from seventy strands of nylon for every thirty strands of rubber. The sheath 14 may be formed from sixty strands of nylon for every forty strands of rubber.
In some embodiments, as shown in
In some embodiments, as shown in
As shown in
As shown in
In some embodiments, as shown in
Attachment members 24 and 28 may include a carabiner 26, a loop 30, a latch, a tether key or tether end, a buckle, a fastener, or another attachment to a tool or anchor point. Attachment members 24 and 28 may provide an anchor point to lanyard 10 or be a tool holding member. In operation, the first attachment member 24, such as the carabiner 26, can be secured to a fixed anchor point, and the second attachment member 28, such as the loop 30, can be secured to a tool (not shown) used by the operator. In this manner, if and when the operator drops the tool, the tool is elastically supported by the lanyard 10 up to the extended length of sheath 14, which is secured to the anchor point. When the tool reaches the extended length of sheath 14, the inelastic response of the sheath 14 dominates, providing a reliable limit to the distance the falling object travels, regardless of the weight, the height dropped, or other characteristics.
In some embodiments, as shown in
For example, in
The elastic cord 34 may stretch between an un-stretched length and a stretched length. The un-stretched length is less than the fully extended length of sheath 14. Thus, sheath 14 is bunched up or kinked about the elastic cord 34. The elasticity of the sheath 14 is less than the elasticity of the elastic cord 34. This configuration enables the elastic cord 34 to stretch to absorb energy when lanyard 10 is supporting a falling object. The stretched length of the elastic cord 34 can vary between the un-stretched length of elastic cord 34 and the fully extended length of sheath 14. Between these limits, the stretched length of the elastic cord 34 elastically absorbs the kinetic energy of the falling object.
In some embodiments, as shown in
In the embodiment of
In some embodiments, as shown in
Carabiner 26, as shown in
Carabiner 26 may be biased towards the closed position. Applying pressure to gate 78 pivots the gate 78 between the closed position in which the gate 78 engages the second end 70 and the open position, in which the gate 78 has pivoted the maximum possible distance over the range of motion 82, thus maximizing the expanded opening 74. Once pressure is released, gate 78 engages the second end 70 in the closed position. Gate 78 can latch and/or lock to the second end 70 of carabiner 26 to securely close carabiner 26 and keep it closed. In some embodiments, gate 78 is biased by a biasing member, such as a spring (not shown), towards the closed position. Gate 78 may include a lock or cover (not shown) that rotates or slides to cover second end 70 and secure gate 78 in the closed position to prevent accidental opening or release of carabiner 26.
The body 62 of the carabiner 26 may optionally be attached to swivel 48 and includes a first end 66, a first wall portion 86, a second wall portion 90, and a second end 70. The shape of carabiner 26 is defined by body 62 at the first wall portion 86 and the second wall portion 90. The first wall portion 86 is approximately parallel to the gate 78 when the gate 78 is in the closed position and the second wall portion 90 is linked to the first wall portion 86. For example, second wall portion 90 may make an acute, obtuse, or right angle with first wall portion 86. As illustrated, the second wall portion 90 makes an acute angle with the first wall portion 86, which is approximately parallel to gate 78 in the closed position. Other configurations and embodiments of carabiner 26, including non-parallel and/or alternate angles are envisioned.
As shown in
By inspection of
Carabiner 26 includes gate 78 pivotably coupled to a first end 66 of carabiner 26. Gate 78 is configured to clasp a second end 70 of the carabiner 26 in a closed position. Rotation of the gate 78 to an open position defines the minimum wall separation distance 98 between gate 78 in the open position and walls 86 and 90 of the carabiner 26. The open position also defines a gate separation distance 94 between the second end 70 of the carabiner 26 and gate 78. In some embodiments, the minimum wall separation distance 98 between the gate 78 and walls 86 and 90 is greater than the gate separation distance 94 between the gate 78 and the second end 70 of carabiner 26.
In the configuration of
As shown in
For each category of weight-rated lanyard 10, there are three types of drop tests, as explained below. First, the lanyard 10 was subjected to a first 2× drop test while supporting the rated weight of the lanyard 10 and a peak force on the lanyard 10 was measured for this first drop. Second, the lanyard 10 was subjected to nine more individual 2× drop tests while supporting the rated weight of lanyard 10. For each of these nine additional drops, the peak force on lanyard 10 was measured. The value listed in the Table in
During a drop, the length 118 of the elastic cord(s) 34 can change between four separate stages: (1) an initial un-tensioned stage; (2) a tensioned stage when the length of the elastic cord(s) 34 is less than the length of the unkinked sheath 14; (3) a tensioned stage where the length of the elastic cord(s) 34 is equal to the fully extended length of sheath 14; and (4) a fully stretched stage in which the elastic cord(s) 34 and/or the sheath 14 become entirely stretched. In the Table above, the initial un-tensioned stage values are represented in the “Un-tensioned length 118 of elastic cord(s) 34” column, and the fully stretched stage values are represented in the “Fully stretched length 118 of elastic cord(s) 34” column.
When the elastic cord(s) 34 becomes the same length as the unkinked sheath 14, it is between 38% and 115% longer than its un-tensioned length. When the elastic cord(s) 34 becomes the same length as the unkinked sheath 14, the sheath 14 becomes tensioned, and the elastic cord(s) 34 and the sheath 14 begin stretching together as a system. As demonstrated in the Table above, the respective lengths of the sheath 14 and elastic cord(s) 34 are selected to provide a lower peak force when a weight (e.g., of a tool) is near the lanyards' rated weight and when the weight on the tool 150 is dropped from a height greater than the un-tensioned length 142 of lanyard 10.
Because the sheath 14 is inelastic, the fully extended length of sheath 14 roughly defines a limiting tension length of lanyard 10. When the one or more elastic cords 34 within sheath 14 are stretched between a pre-tensioned length and a tensioned length, they are unrestrained up to the fully extended length of the sheath 14. When the tensioned length reaches the length of the fully extended sheath 14, the elastic cords 34 reach the limiting tension length of lanyard 10. Thus, the tensioned length of the elastic cord(s) 34 is less than or equal to the limiting tensioned length of sheath 14. In some embodiments, the limiting tension length of sheath 14 is between 30% and 125% greater than the pre-tensioned length of the elastic cord(s) 34. In some embodiments, the limiting tension length of sheath 14 is between 38% and 115% greater than the pre-tensioned length of elastic cord(s) 34. The limiting tension length of sheath 14 may be between 45% and 110% of the pre-tensioned length of elastic cord(s) 34. The limiting tension length of sheath 14 may be between 50% and 105% of the pre-tensioned length of elastic cord(s) 34. The limiting tension length of sheath 14 may be between 55% and 100% of the pre-tensioned length of elastic cord(s) 34.
In the tests described below, the length of the sheath 14 was selected to study the elastic properties of the elastic cord(s) 34. As such, the length of sheath 14 was selected to be greater than the elastic response of the lanyard 10 system to prevent the limiting tensioning length of the sheath 14 from interfering with the test results.
As shown in the Table in
In another embodiment of a lanyard 192 shown in
As shown in
The same drop tests illustrated in
For purposes of this disclosure, the term “coupled” means the joining of two components directly or indirectly to one another. Such joining may be stationary in nature or movable in nature. Such joining may be achieved with the two members and any additional intermediate members being integrally formed as a single unitary body with one another or with the two members or the two members and any additional member being attached to one another. Such joining may be permanent in nature or alternatively may be removable or releasable in nature.
It should be understood that the figures illustrate the exemplary embodiments in detail, and it should be understood that the present application is not limited to the details or methodology set forth in the description or illustrated in the figures. It should also be understood that the terminology is for the purpose of description only and should not be regarded as limiting.
Further modifications and alternative embodiments of various aspects of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art in view of this description. Accordingly, this description is to be construed as illustrative only. The construction and arrangements, shown in the various exemplary embodiments, are illustrative only. Although only a few embodiments have been described in detail in this disclosure, many modifications are possible (e.g., variations in sizes, dimensions, structures, shapes and proportions of the various elements, values of parameters, mounting arrangements, use of materials, colors, orientations, etc.) without materially departing from the novel teachings and advantages of the subject matter described herein. Some elements shown as integrally formed may be constructed of multiple parts or elements, the position of elements may be reversed or otherwise varied, and the nature or number of discrete elements or positions may be altered or varied. The order or sequence of any process, logical algorithm, or method steps may be varied or re-sequenced according to alternative embodiments. Other substitutions, modifications, changes and omissions may also be made in the design, operating conditions and arrangement of the various exemplary embodiments without departing from the scope of the present invention.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/240,546, filed Jan. 4, 2019, which is a continuation of International Application No. PCT/US2018/066873, filed Dec. 20, 2018, which claims the benefit and priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/609,078, filed on Dec. 21, 2017, which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4765037 | Perry | Aug 1988 | A |
5229178 | Zemitis | Jul 1993 | A |
5871193 | Jacobs et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5970697 | Jacobs et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6216319 | Elkins | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6264081 | Wojciak et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6299040 | Matias | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6487756 | Vidal, Jr. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6732834 | Colorado | May 2004 | B2 |
6776317 | Parker | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6880702 | Colorado | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6959784 | Diggle et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7124470 | Alanis | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7784258 | Hess | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7963365 | Grilliot et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8061479 | Harris et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8061480 | Grilliot et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8117678 | Moreau et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8312964 | Harris et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
D675084 | Moreau et al. | Jan 2013 | S |
D692231 | Moreau et al. | Oct 2013 | S |
8757455 | Smalley | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8863898 | Harris, Jr. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8931593 | Harris et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9028401 | Bacich et al. | May 2015 | B1 |
9033199 | Weber | May 2015 | B2 |
9101391 | Bacich et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9199105 | Hung | Dec 2015 | B1 |
9232850 | Moreau et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9242127 | London, Sr. et al. | Jan 2016 | B1 |
9339100 | Moreau et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9402457 | Moreau et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9468285 | Martinez | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9480327 | Moreau et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9486655 | London, Sr. et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9510634 | Bookbinder et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9885379 | Hung | Feb 2018 | B1 |
20020074185 | Colorado | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020174521 | Vidal, Jr. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20040231101 | Alanis | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050039980 | Diggle et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050173188 | Lewis et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177928 | Moreau et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050211188 | Grilliot et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050283952 | Talbot et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050284696 | Grilliot et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060070800 | Lewis et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060113147 | Harris, Jr. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060272890 | Harmon et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070012513 | Grilliot et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070048554 | Jacobs et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070102240 | Wilson | May 2007 | A1 |
20070137163 | Hess | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070202286 | Jacobs et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080009185 | Knoll et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080047997 | Mayfield | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080134416 | Moreau et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080163464 | Baumann | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090009185 | Herbst | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090056088 | Petzl et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20100122874 | Harris, Jr. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100147912 | Salentine | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110042533 | Austin | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20120048646 | Harris, Jr. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120073904 | Harris, Jr. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120170873 | Mathews | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120267403 | Ward, Jr. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120312852 | Smalley | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130068561 | Harris, Jr. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130256349 | Styth et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130299544 | Moreau et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140013544 | Moreau et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140076945 | Weber | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140201888 | Bookbinder et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140259551 | Egbert | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140339017 | Wood | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150033506 | Leslie | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150133727 | Bacich et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150133737 | Bacich et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150133779 | Yurek et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150142045 | Bachich | May 2015 | A1 |
20150217150 | Harris | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150289633 | Moreau et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150351524 | Martinez | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160081446 | Maddox et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160095420 | Moreau et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160095421 | Moreau et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160107005 | Rogelja | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160143384 | Moreau et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160144530 | Weinig et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160183620 | Moreau et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160208835 | Derr | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160286943 | Andersen et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170281989 | Wood | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180038408 | Hung | Feb 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101711912 | May 2010 | CN |
20-0208710 | Jan 2001 | KR |
WO14088603 | Jun 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/066873, dated Apr. 18, 2019, 12 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/2017/047887, dated Mar. 7, 2019, 16 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200345125 A1 | Nov 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62609078 | Dec 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16240546 | Jan 2019 | US |
Child | 16931118 | US | |
Parent | PCT/US2018/066873 | Dec 2018 | US |
Child | 16240546 | US |