The present invention relates to biopsy needles and more particularly to small-diameter biopsy needles suited for automated sampling operation.
Often, it is either desirable or necessary to obtain specimens of tissue from humans and other animals, particularly in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with cancerous tumors, premalignant conditions, and other diseases or disorders. For example, when it is discovered that suspicious conditions exist, either by means of x-ray or ultrasound imaging in various tissues of the body, a physician typically performs a biopsy to determine if the cells at the suspected site are cancerous.
A biopsy can be done either by an open or percutaneous technique. Open biopsy is an invasive procedure using a scalpel, whereby either a portion (incisional biopsy) or the entire mass (excisional biopsy) is removed. Percutaneous biopsy is usually done with a needle-like instrument through a relatively small incision, and can be performed by fine needle aspiration (FNA) or through the taking of a core biopsy sample. In FNA biopsy, individual cells or clusters of cells are obtained for cytologic examination and can be prepared such as in a Papanicolaou smear. In a core biopsy, a core or fragment of the tissue is obtained for histologic examination.
Intact tissue from the organ, lesion, or tumor is preferred by medical personnel in order to arrive at a definitive diagnosis regarding the patient's condition. In most cases only part of the tissue in question needs to be sampled. The portions of tissue extracted must be indicative of the organ, lesion, or tumor as a whole. Often, multiple tissue samples from various locations of the mass being sampled may be taken.
The percutaneous biopsy procedure can be performed utilizing various techniques and devices. An example is a method and a device that employs a biopsy needle for cutting tissue sample as described in British Patent Publication No. GB 2018601A. In the described biopsy device, living tissue is drawn into a cutting region under vacuum. The vacuum is created in the needle by employing connecting lines to a vacuum generator situated outside of a hand piece that holds the cannula. The cutting of the sample is done using a cutting mechanism that moves axially over the cannula. After the needle is withdrawn from the host, the sample is flushed out from the tip of the needle. The vacuum established in the hollow needle is regulated externally from the hand-piece.
Another biopsy mechanism is described in European Patent Publication No. EP 0890 339 A1. A biopsy needle, with a cutting mechanism, is integrated into a hand piece. The needle is connected via connection lines to an external vacuum generator and controls. The cutting device is moveable axially in the hollow space of the biopsy needle. A rotary movement, combined with a manual lengthwise push causes the cutting device to sample the tissue from the host. The sample is transported in the hollow channel of the needle. A similar arrangement is also shown by U.S. Pat. No. 5,526,822.
A vacuum-assisted biopsy device is described in U.S. Patent Publication No. 2001/0011156 A1, provides for a compactly configured hand device, in whose housing all drive elements necessary for propelling the needle of the biopsy needle arrangement are provided. A partial vacuum source is provided separate from the hand device, which can be connected via an appropriate supply line to the needle arrangement inside the hand device at a suitable connection location.
US Patent Publication No. 20050203439, describes a biopsy device for taking tissue samples, which includes a housing, a removable element and a control panel. The removable part has a vacuum pump in the form of a syringe which is driven by a first motor and a biopsy needle which is driven by a separate motor under the control of a controller built into a permanent hand set. The needle and syringe are provided as a sterile package unit.
Small diameter biopsy needles are desirable because they have the potential to generate less tissue trauma in the host during use. Generally, biopsy needles use a cutting tip that slices tissue as the needle is advanced. Since biopsy needles need to be inserted a considerable distance before reaching the location of the tissue to be sampled, having a small diameter means less tissue is cut by the cutting tip.
It would be desirable for a biopsy needle of small diameter to provide greater sample size with less trauma than larger size needles. But small-diameter needles are believed to pose a greater design challenge because of the structural demands on a small diameter device.
A biopsy needle must endure significant loads, which makes it difficult to create biopsy needles with small diameters. If, for example, a 10 gauge needle is simply scaled down in size, every dimension, including wall thickness, length, the size of the sample recess, and the gaps between the stylet and the sheath, is reduced. If tolerances are not scaled, the gaps remain constant which means the stylet has to be reduced by a disproportionate amount in order to reduce the outside needle diameter. As a result, bending forces which are of little concern in a 10 gauge needle, are significant in a 14 gauge needle. In addition, the wall of the sample basket, which, reduced in thickness, must withstand the shearing forces caused by drawing tissue under vacuum into the sample recess. Typically, the constraints force design concessions. For example most 14 gauge needles are able to dissect samples that are only a tenth as large as a 10 gauge needle.
Although the following is not a comprehensive list of features, three major features the invention address the above problems permitting a reliable 14 gauge needle with large sample size. First, longitudinal cutting edges on the sides of the sample recess are located at a greater radial distance from the axis of the stylet than the inner diameter of the sample recess. This improves the ability of the walls of the sample recess to withstand shearing forces resulting from drawing tissue under vacuum into the sample recess. Second, the stylet is reinforced by an internal longitudinal reinforcement element, preferably along the entire length of the stylet proximal of the sample recess. Preferably, the reinforcement is affixed to the stylet, for example by welding. Third, the proximal end, along a substantial length thereof, is supported and constrained to resist bending thereof.
According to an embodiment, a biopsy device has a generally cylindrical hollow stylet having a uniform wall thickness. The stylet has an inner diameter, an outer diameter, and a longitudinal axis. The stylet has a distal end, and a proximal end, the distal and proximal ends being disposed on the axis. The stylet has a working length from the distal end that extends beyond a housing when inserted therein. A longitudinal recess forms a sample chamber that is positioned adjacent the distal end extending axially a distance of between 10 and 25% of the working length. More preferably, the sample chamber extends axially a distance of about 0.75 inch. A longitudinal insert is connected to the stylet such that additional bending-resisting reinforcement is provided to the stylet.
Preferably, the longitudinal insert is affixed within the stylet along a major fraction of the working length and more preferably, the longitudinal insert is affixed along most of the working length. Preferably, the longitudinal insert is a cylinder. The cylinder preferably has a lumen whose diameter is approximately 0.0025 in. The longitudinal insert is preferably affixed between the recess and a position proximal of the distal end. The stylet's ratio of wall diameter to the wall thickness is preferably less than 15 and more preferably about 10. Note that although other configurations of reinforcement inserts may be used, which have one or more channels or lumens, preferably, no single open area facing the sample chamber is greater than about 0.0025 in. equivalent diameter to prevent solid sample material being drawn into the one or more channels. Equivalent diameter is four times the open area divided by the internal perimeter of the open area.
According to another embodiment, a biopsy device has a generally cylindrical hollow stylet having a distal end with a sample recess configured to receive biopsy samples, and a proximal portion. A mounting member is configured to support the proximal portion of the stylet such that bending of the proximal portion is resisted by the mounting member supporting the proximal portion at at least three support points therealong. A longitudinal reinforcement is affixed at multiple affixation points to the stylet and extending along a major fraction of the stylet and also extending between the at least three support points, such that the reinforcement also resists bending. Preferably, the at least three support points are included in a continuous series of points of contact between a longitudinal reinforcement and the mounting member. Preferably, the stylet has a working length from the distal end that extends axially of the mounting member when held thereby. Preferably, the sample recess has cutting edges extending parallel to an axis joining the distal end and the proximal portion, the cutting edges being on lateral sides of the longitudinal recess. Preferably, the cutting edges define an apex angle of about 40°.
According to another embodiment, a biopsy device has a generally cylindrical hollow stylet having a uniform wall thickness, an inner diameter, an outer diameter, and a longitudinal axis. The stylet preferably has a distal end with a sample recess configured to receive biopsy samples. The stylet also has a proximal end, the distal and proximal ends being disposed on the axis. Preferably, a mounting structure holds the stylet, the stylet having a working length from the distal end that extends distally of the mounting structure when supported thereby. The longitudinal recess forms a sample chamber and positioned adjacent the distal end extending axially a distance of between 10 and 25% of the working length. The longitudinal recess preferably has cutting edges extending parallel to the axis on lateral sides of the longitudinal recess. The cutting edges preferably have a depth, perpendicular to the axis, of between 2.5 and 4 times the wall thickness. The distance between the cutting edges is preferably less than the outer diameter and greater than the inner diameter.
A longitudinal insert may also be included to provide additional reinforcement to the stylet. The longitudinal insert is preferably affixed within the stylet along a major fraction of the working length. The longitudinal insert is preferably affixed between the recess and a position distal of the proximal end. The ratio of the diameter to the wall thickness is preferably less than 15 and, more preferably, about 10.
According to another embodiment, a biopsy device has a generally cylindrical hollow stylet having a uniform wall thickness, an inner diameter, an outer diameter, and a longitudinal axis. The stylet has a distal end with a sample recess configured to receive biopsy samples, and a proximal end, the distal and proximal ends being disposed on the axis. A mounting structure holds the stylet, the stylet having a working length from the distal end that extends distally of the mounting structure when supported thereby. A longitudinal recess forms a sample chamber and positioned adjacent the distal end extending axially a distance of between 10 and 25% of the working length. A longitudinal insert is connected to the stylet such that additional bending-resisting reinforcement is provided to the stylet. The longitudinal insert is affixed within the stylet along a major fraction of the working length. The longitudinal insert may be a cylinder. The cylinder has a lumen whose diameter is approximately 0.0025 in. The longitudinal insert is affixed within the stylet along a major fraction of the working length.
According to another embodiment, a biopsy device has a generally cylindrical hollow stylet having a uniform wall thickness, an inner diameter, an outer diameter, and a longitudinal axis. The stylet has a distal end with a sample recess configured to receive biopsy samples, and a proximal end, the distal and proximal ends being disposed on the axis. A mounting structure holds the stylet, the stylet having a working length from the distal end that extends distally of the mounting structure when supported thereby. A longitudinal recess forms a sample chamber positioned adjacent the distal end extending axially along a portion of the stylet. A cylindrical longitudinal insert is connected to the stylet such that additional bending-resisting reinforcement is provided to the stylet along a major fraction of its length. Preferably, the cylinder has a lumen whose diameter is no more than 0.0025 in. and preferably about 0.0025 in. The reinforcement is preferably affixed within the stylet along a major fraction of the working length. The reinforcement is affixed between the recess and a position distal of the proximal end. The ratio of the diameter to the wall thickness is about 10.
According to another embodiment, a biopsy device has a generally cylindrical hollow stylet having a uniform wall thickness, an inner diameter, an outer diameter, and a longitudinal axis. The stylet has a distal end with a sample recess configured to receive biopsy samples and a proximal end, the distal and proximal ends being disposed on the axis. A mounting structure holds the stylet, the stylet having a working length from the distal end that extends distally of the mounting structure when supported thereby. A longitudinal recess forms a sample chamber positioned adjacent the distal end extending axially a distance of between 10 and 25% of the working length.
Preferably, the longitudinal recess has cutting edges extending parallel to the axis on lateral sides of the longitudinal recess. The cutting edges have planar faces that lie opposite each other on either side of the axis and define an angle such that the planar faces have a widest spacing at the cutting edge and taper toward the bases of the cutting edges where they widen to the wall thickness of the stylet. The distance between the cutting edges is less than the outer diameter and greater than the inner diameter. Preferably, a longitudinal insert provides additional reinforcement to the stylet. Preferably, the longitudinal insert is affixed within the stylet along a substantial fraction of the working length. Preferably, the longitudinal insert is affixed within the stylet along a most of the working length. Preferably, the longitudinal insert is affixed between the recess and a position distal of the proximal end. Preferably, the ratio of the diameter to the wall thickness is less than 15. More preferably, the ratio of the diameter to the wall thickness is about 10.
According to another embodiment, a biopsy device has a generally cylindrical hollow stylet having a uniform wall thickness, an inner diameter, an outer diameter, and a longitudinal axis. The stylet has a distal end with a sample recess configured to receive biopsy samples and a proximal end, the distal and proximal ends being disposed on the axis. A mounting structure holds the stylet, the stylet having a working length from the distal end that extends distally of the mounting structure when supported thereby. The longitudinal recess has cutting edges extending parallel to the axis on lateral sides of the longitudinal recess. The cutting edges define an apex angle of about 40°.
Preferably, the distance between the cutting edges is less than the outer diameter and greater than the inner diameter. Preferably, a longitudinal insert provides additional reinforcement to the stylet. Preferably, the longitudinal insert is affixed within the stylet along a substantial fraction of the working length. More preferably, the longitudinal insert is affixed within the stylet along a most of the working length. Preferably, the longitudinal insert is affixed between the recess and a position distal of the proximal end. Preferably, the ratio of the diameter to the wall thickness is less than 15. Preferably, the ratio of the diameter to the wall thickness is about 10. Preferably, the cutting edges having a depth, perpendicular to the axis, of between 2.5 and 4 times the wall thickness.
According to another embodiment, a biopsy device has a generally cylindrical hollow stylet having a distal end with a sample recess configured to receive biopsy samples, and a proximal end, the distal and proximal ends being disposed on an axis. A mounting structure is configured to support a proximal portion of the stylet such that bending of the proximal portion is resisted by supporting the proximal portion at multiple points along the proximal portion.
Preferably, the multiple points are a continuous series of points of contact between an axially-elongated support element within the mounting structure. Preferably, the axially-elongated support element is located at a distal end of the mounting structure. Preferably, the stylet has a working length from the distal end that extends distally of the mounting structure when supported thereby. Preferably, the longitudinal recess has cutting edges extending parallel to the axis on lateral sides of the longitudinal recess. Preferably, the cutting edges define an apex angle of about 40°.
Preferably, the distance between the cutting edges is less than the outer diameter and greater than the inner diameter. Preferably, a longitudinal insert providing additional reinforcement to the stylet. Preferably, the longitudinal insert is affixed within the stylet along a major fraction of the working length. Preferably, the longitudinal insert is affixed within the stylet along a most of the working length. Preferably, the longitudinal insert is affixed between the recess and a position distal of the proximal end. Preferably, the ratio of the diameter to the wall thickness is less than 15. More preferably, the ratio of the diameter to the wall thickness is about 10.
Preferably, the cutting edges having a depth, perpendicular to the axis, of between 2.5 and 4 times the wall thickness. Preferably, a vacuum pump is provided that is capable of drawing a vacuum of at least 21 in. Hg in the stylet. Preferably, the vacuum pump is capable of drawing a vacuum of at least 21 in. Hg in the sample recess.
According to another embodiment, a biopsy device has a generally cylindrical hollow stylet having a distal end with a sample recess configured to receive biopsy samples, a proximal end, the distal and proximal ends being disposed on an axis. A reinforcement element is affixed inside the stylet and located proximal of the sample recess, having at least one channel therethrough, the at least one channel having no single open area adjacent to the sample recess greater than about 0.0025 in. equivalent diameter. A mounting structure is preferably configured to support a proximal portion of the stylet such that bending of the proximal portion is resisted by supporting the proximal portion at multiple points along the proximal portion, at least several of the multiple points being supported at longitudinal locations that coincide with the reinforcement element.
According to another embodiment, a biopsy device has a 14 gauge needle having a generally cylindrical hollow stylet. The stylet has a distal end with a sample recess configured to receive biopsy samples. The sample recess has longitudinal cutting edges on lateral sides thereof, the cutting edges cutting the stylet at about 70% of the stylet outer diameter. Preferably, the cutting edges have internal faces that are angled such that the cutting edges are further apart at their apexes than at their bases.
According to another embodiment a biopsy device has a generally cylindrical hollow stylet having a distal end with a sample recess configured to receive biopsy samples, and a proximal portion. A mounting member is configured to support the proximal portion of the stylet such that bending of the proximal portion is resisted by the mounting member supporting the proximal portion at at least three support points therealong. A longitudinal reinforcement is affixed at multiple affixation points to the stylet and extending along a significant fraction of the stylet and also extending between the at least three support points, such that the reinforcement also resists bending.
According to an embodiment, a biopsy device has a generally cylindrical hollow stylet having a uniform wall thickness. The stylet has an inner diameter, an outer diameter, and a longitudinal axis. The stylet has a distal end, and a proximal end, the distal and proximal ends being disposed on the axis. The stylet has a working length from the distal end that extends beyond a housing when inserted therein. A longitudinal recess forms a sample chamber that extends axially along the working length. A cylindrical longitudinal insert is connected to the stylet such that additional bending-resisting reinforcement is provided to the stylet.
Preferably, the longitudinal insert is affixed within the stylet along a significant fraction of the working length and more preferably, the longitudinal insert is affixed along most of the working length. The insert, in the cylinder embodiment, has a lumen whose diameter is approximately 0.0025 in. The longitudinal insert is preferably affixed between the recess and a position distal of the proximal end. The stylet's ratio of wall diameter to the wall thickness is preferably less than 15 and greater than 4. More preferably, it is in the range of 9-12 and even more preferably, the ratio of the diameter to the wall thickness is about 10 for a stylet whose outer diameter is about 2 mm or a 14 gauge biopsy needle.
According to another embodiment, a biopsy device has a generally cylindrical hollow stylet having a uniform wall thickness. The stylet has an inner diameter, an outer diameter, and a longitudinal axis. The stylet has a distal end, and a proximal end, the distal and proximal ends being disposed on the axis. The stylet has a working length from the distal end that extends beyond a housing when inserted therein. The working length is defined by a distal-most support element attached to the stylet or a position where the stylet is supported along its length when inserted in a housing. A longitudinal recess forms a sample chamber that is positioned adjacent the distal end extending axially a distance of between 10 and 25% of the working length. The longitudinal recess has cutting edges extending parallel to the axis on lateral sides of the longitudinal recess. The cutting edges having planar faces that lie opposite each other on either side of the axis and define an angle such that the planar faces have a widest spacing at the cutting edge. The distance between the cutting edges is less than the outer diameter and greater than the inner diameter.
Preferably, the biopsy device also has a longitudinal insert providing additional reinforcement to the stylet. The longitudinal insert is preferably affixed within the stylet to multiple points separated by a significant fraction of the working length and more preferably, at the ends of the longitudinal insert. The means of affixation may be welding, adhesion, or any other bonding method. The insert may be compression-fitted by heating and subsequent cooling so that it is affixed along its entire length. The longitudinal insert is preferably affixed between the recess and a position distal of the proximal end. The ratio of wall diameter to the wall thickness is preferably less than 15. The ratio of the diameter to the wall thickness is more preferably about 10.
According to yet another embodiment, the biopsy device has a generally cylindrical hollow stylet having an axis, and a distal end with a sample recess configured to receive biopsy samples. At least one support fixture holds the stylet, the fixture having at least first and second support portions separated along the axis of the stylet. The stylet has a proximal portion extending from a point proximal of the sample recess to the first and second support portions. The proximal portion has a stiffness that is substantially greater than a tube whose diameter and wall thickness is the same as the diameter and wall thickness of the sample recess. Preferably, the support fixture has at least a third support portion to prevent bending of the stylet.
According to another embodiment, a biopsy device has a generally cylindrical hollow stylet with a uniform wall thickness, an inner diameter, and an outer diameter. The stylet also has a longitudinal axis and distal and proximal ends. The distal and proximal ends are disposed on the axis. The housing is configured to support a proximal portion of the stylet therewithin such that bending of the proximal portion is resisted by supporting the proximal portion at multiple points along the proximal portion.
According to another embodiment a biopsy device has a generally cylindrical hollow stylet with a uniform wall thickness, an inner diameter, an outer diameter, and a longitudinal axis. The stylet has a distal end and a proximal end. The distal and proximal ends are disposed on the axis. The stylet has a working length from the distal end that extends beyond a housing when inserted therein. The stylet has a longitudinal recess with cutting edges extending parallel to the axis on lateral sides of the longitudinal recess, with the cutting edges defining an apex angle of about 40°.
According to another embodiment, a biopsy device has a generally cylindrical hollow stylet having a distal end with a sample recess configured to receive biopsy samples, and a proximal portion. A mounting member is configured to support the proximal portion of the stylet such that bending of the proximal portion is resisted by the mounting member supporting the proximal portion at at least three support points therealong. The at least three support points may be included in a continuous series of points of contact between a longitudinal reinforcement and the mounting member.
A longitudinal reinforcement may be affixed at multiple affixation points to the stylet and extending along a substantial fraction of the stylet and also extending between the at least three support points, such that the reinforcement also resists bending.
The stylet can have a working length from the distal end that extends axially of the mounting member when held thereby. The sample recess preferably has cutting edges extending parallel to an axis joining the distal end and the proximal portion, the cutting edges being on lateral sides of the longitudinal recess. The cutting edges preferably define an apex angle of about 40°.
According to another embodiment, a biopsy device has a generally stylet having a distal end with a sample recess configured to receive biopsy samples, and a proximal portion. A mounting member is configured to support the proximal portion of the stylet such that bending of the proximal portion is resisted by the mounting member supporting the proximal portion at at least three support points therealong. The proximal portion extends from a point proximal of the sample recess continuous to and between the at least three support points, the proximal portion having a stiffness substantially greater than a portion distal thereto. The proximal portion has a lumen extending to the sample recess. The proximal portion is a cylinder with a lumen therein, the lumen having a substantially smaller equivalent diameter than the sample recess.
Various driving mechanisms for biopsy needles are known and many are suitable for use with the invention disclosed below. A preferred type of drive mechanism is a self-contained unit disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/500,522, published as U.S. 2005/0203439 (referred to in the background section) filed in the U.S. on Apr. 6, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,109,885, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/500,518, published as U.S. 2005/0165328, filed in the U.S. on Mar. 1, 2005 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,002,713), both of which are hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.
Referring to
The edges of the sample chamber opening 113 are chamfered to form cutting edges 114 on either side of the sample chamber opening 113. The outsides 114A of the cutting edges 114 are defined by the cylindrical surface 116 of the stylet 100 whereas the inside surfaces 114B of the cutting edges 114 are defined by flat surfaces, also indicated at 114B. The flat surfaces 114B can be created by machining, for example.
The ratios and dimensions discussed below and elsewhere in the present application are preferable for a 14 gauge stylet 100, which preferably includes a cutting sheath as described below. Preferably, the sample chamber opening 113 has a width that is between the outer diameter M of the stylet 100 and the inner diameter N1 of the stylet 100. In addition, preferably, the inside surfaces 114B of the cutting edges 114 slope away from a plane of symmetry 114D such that they are wider apart at the cutting edges 114 than the lines 114C where the inside surfaces 114B of the cutting edges 114 meet the inside surface 103 of the stylet 100.
Note that the inside surfaces 114B of the cutting edges 114 can be flat or curved to achieve substantially the same configuration. Preferably, the distance between the lines 114C, on opposite sides of the inside surface 103 of the stylet, are separated by a distance approximately equal to the inside diameter N1 of the stylet. Preferably, the angle K is greater than 10 degrees and more preferably it is greater than 15° and even more preferably, it is about 19 degrees. Preferably the cutting edges 114 have a height L that is between 2.5 and 4 times the wall thickness J (or M-N1) of the stylet 100. Preferably, in the embodiments of
The cutting edges 114 lie over the centers of the stylet 100 walls and are not aligned with the inner surface 103. That is, it will be observed that each of the cutting edges 114 lies between inner surface 103 and the outer cylindrical surface 116. In this particular example, it will be observed that the sloping side 114B, the surface 114A and the horizontal line intersecting the line 114C form, approximately, a symmetrical triangle 170. Preferably, the cutting edge 114 lies at a radial distance from the longitudinal axis that is less than the inner radius of the basket inner surface 103. In the example, the cutting edge lies well over the base 114D (the base coinciding with a diametric line as in the illustrations) of the triangle 170 so that the angle K is a substantial angle, i.e., is well above zero. As noted, since the walls are thin, and preferably, as discussed below, vacuum levels relatively high, the forces on the cutting edges can be substantial. The forces are compensated by a force with a component directed toward the center of the stylet so the blade edges 114 tend to be pulled together. Thus, providing the cutting edges with the illustrated shape, with the substantial slope ensured by providing a nonzero, positive angle K, helps to supply this compensating force with less risk of bending. Also, the height N2 of the cutting edges, which is low to help to reduce these forces but not overly so, helps ensure large sample size. In the preferred embodiment, the ratio of the height N2 to outer diameter of the stylet is about 70% (i.e., N2 divided by the diameter of inner surface 103 is about 0.7). Another way of stating this is that the plane defined by the two parallel cutting edges cuts the stylet longitudinally at about 70% of its diameter.
Note that the cutting edge 114 can have multiple angles at the apex and the foregoing is an average at the approach to the apex.
The ratio of the length B of the sample chamber opening 113 to working length (W, defined, according to convention, as the length of the stylet 100 extending beyond the apparatus used to handle the needle, such as a hand-held driver unitary device—not shown—as disclosed in US Patent Publication No. 20050203439) is in the range of 0.10 to 0.25 and more preferably, the ratio is about 0.1 to 0.2. Preferably, the axial length of the sample recess is between 0.7 and 1 inch and more preferably, about 0.75 inches. Referring in particular to
In terms of absolute dimensions, the stylet 100 wall thickness J is preferably between 0.005 in. and 0.007 in. and preferably it is about 0.006 in. Preferably the working length is between about 3.5 and 6.5 inches and more preferably, 5.5 inches. This may be varied depending on particular details of the application. For example, for stereotactic applications, the working length is preferably about 140 mm and for handheld applications, the working length can be as low as about 90 mm Angle C is preferably, between 60 and 65 degrees and 120 degrees and angle F is preferably about 120 degrees. A proximal end 120 of the stylet 100 has a taper forming an angle H of approximately 20 degrees. The total length A of the stylet 100 may be chosen based on the connected driver. In a representative embodiment, the total length A of the stylet 100 is about 10 in.
Stresses on 14 gauge biopsy needles (the gauge specification being based on the diameter of the stylet 100, not the stylet with an overlying cutting sheath, to be describe further on) are high, due to the small diameter. This can make ensuring the smooth and reliable operation of the needle difficult. For example, a longitudinally-advancing cutting sleeve (See for example, U.S. Pat. No. 7,025,732, hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein), turning around the stylet 100, may warp the stylet 100 or any bending attending normal manual or machine-held use may cause jamming Various means of addressing these issues are discussed herein, including preventing bending and reinforcing the stylet, but it has also proved useful to provide a lubricant between the stylet and the cutting sheath. Preferably, such a lubricant is sterile and biocompatible. Many lubricants are known, for example, mineral oil, silicone, or Hyaluronan-based lubricants may be used. Preferably, a lubricant is provided as part of a sterile-prepackaged disposable biopsy needle consumable unit.
Another preferred mechanism for helping to ensure reliable and smooth operation of a thin needle is to employ a reinforcement in the needle. Preferably this is done without compromising the sample size such as by providing at least one reinforcement element over most of the length of the stylet 100 but not including the sample chamber 113 such that any reinforcement does not reduce the size of the sample chamber 113. In a preferred configuration, the stylet 100 is provided with an insert 127 along a portion of the stylet 100 that is proximal of the sample chamber 113. The insert 127 may take the form of an annular cylindrical tube (also indicated at 127). The insert 127 may be affixed to the stylet 100 with adhesive, by welding, by compression fit, or by nesting. Preferably, the affixation of the reinforcement is affixed at at least two points that are separated by a substantial axial distance. Preferably the insert 127 has a relatively narrow tubular lumen 105 or other channel to allow fluids to be conveyed to and from the sample chamber 113, such as air (vacuum) and saline (for flushing samples out of the chamber 113). The distal end of the insert 127 may have a beveled surface 107 that coincides with the chamfered end of the sample chamber 113. Preferably, the insert 127 runs along most of the length of the stylet 100. The insert 127 preferably has an internal diameter of 0.025 or less, at least at the distal end thereof to act as a tissue block, preventing tissue from being drawn into the lumen 105 when the sample chamber is subjected to a vacuum by drawing fluid through the lumen 105.
A trocar 111 or other type of cutting tip may be proved at the distal end of the stylet. The beveled end 115 of the stylet 100 may be press-fitted into a hub 151. The beveled end 115, so-fitted, may extend into a recess portion 115 of the hub 151 to provide a portion of a connector. For example, the bevel may stretch a flexible annular adapter (not shown) to form a seal. An alternative insert 167 is shown in
Note that although in the above embodiments, the biopsy needle was described as being used with a cutting sheath that advances and rotates to cut a sample, it is possible to employ a rotating sheath with a blade that is parallel to the sheath axis, or nearly so.
While the biopsy needle is in the insertion position shown in
As the outer sheath 206 rotates toward the position shown in
To remove the tissue sample, the operation depicted in
As in the previous embodiments, the outer sheath 206 could rotate in either direction, or both directions, in alternative embodiments. For example, the port 231 could be uncovered by rotating in one direction and the cutting operation and covering could occur after reversing the direction of rotation immediately after uncovering the port 231. This alternative may be provided for all of the embodiments described herein. In addition, the blade 221 may be on either or both sides of the opening 251. As in the previous embodiments, the speed of rotation of the outer sheath 206 may be constant or variable. For example, to reduce amplify torque from the drive mechanism, a reduced force/torque transmission ratio of the drive may be provided to level the prime mover load through the cutting phase. The port 231 may be angled to help reduce the instantaneous torque load on the outer sheath 206 drive mechanism (not shown).
The other type of cutting sheath discussed above is illustrated in
Referring to
The internal reinforcement elements described in the foregoing can have various cross-sectional shapes, for example a cross-shape as indicated at 434, which may provide vacuum-transmitting lumens at the corners 432 or may include a central lumen 431 for that purpose. Other shapes such as triangular, square, pentagonal or lobed structures may be employed, again, with or without a centrally-located lumen.
The issue of rigidity is also preferably addressed by means of a constraining support structure that helps to prevent the bending of the stylet.
Preferably, additional or modified supports are provided as discussed below. Both embodiments of
The most effective location for the additional supports 450 is midway between the supports 440 and 448 but this may or may not be possible given other packaging requirements, depending on the particulars of the application. A compromise on the position of additional supports may therefore be required. Additional supports 452 and the strength and rigidity provided by the supports may be combined to aid in preventing bending. In addition or alternatively, as illustrated in embodiment of
To assist in securing large sample size, the magnitude of the vacuum used to draw samples into the sample chamber is preferably at least 21 in. Hg and more preferably at least 22 in. Hg.
While the present invention has been disclosed with reference to certain preferred exemplary embodiments, numerous modifications, alterations, and changes to the described exemplary embodiments are possible without departing from the sphere and scope of the present invention. Accordingly, it is intended that the present invention not be limited to the described exemplary embodiments, but that it have the full scope of the following claims and the equivalents thereof.
This application is a division of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/446,664 filed Apr. 22, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,262,586, which is a U.S. national phase of International Application No. PCT/US2007/082259, filed Oct. 23, 2007, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Serial No. 60/862,723, filed Oct. 24, 2006, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
737293 | Summerfeldt | Aug 1903 | A |
1585934 | Muir | May 1926 | A |
1663761 | Johnson | Mar 1928 | A |
2953934 | Sundt | Sep 1960 | A |
3019733 | Braid | Feb 1962 | A |
3224434 | Molomut et al. | Dec 1965 | A |
3289669 | Dwyer et al. | Dec 1966 | A |
3477423 | Griffith | Nov 1969 | A |
3512519 | Hall | May 1970 | A |
3561429 | Jewett et al. | Feb 1971 | A |
3565074 | Foti | Feb 1971 | A |
3606878 | Kellogg | Sep 1971 | A |
3727602 | Hyden et al. | Apr 1973 | A |
3732858 | Banko | May 1973 | A |
3785380 | Brumfield | Jan 1974 | A |
3800783 | Jamshidi | Apr 1974 | A |
3844272 | Banko | Oct 1974 | A |
3882849 | Jamshidi | May 1975 | A |
3889682 | Denis et al. | Jun 1975 | A |
3916948 | Benjamin | Nov 1975 | A |
4275730 | Hussein | Jun 1981 | A |
4282884 | Boebel | Aug 1981 | A |
4306570 | Matthews | Dec 1981 | A |
4354092 | Manabe et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4393879 | Milgrom | Jul 1983 | A |
4445509 | Auth | May 1984 | A |
4490137 | Moukheibir | Dec 1984 | A |
4549554 | Markham | Oct 1985 | A |
4577629 | Martinez | Mar 1986 | A |
4589414 | Yoshida et al. | May 1986 | A |
4603694 | Wheeler | Aug 1986 | A |
4605011 | Naslund | Aug 1986 | A |
4616215 | Maddalena | Oct 1986 | A |
4617430 | Bryant | Oct 1986 | A |
4620539 | Andrews et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4643197 | Greene et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4645153 | Granzow et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4678459 | Onik et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4696298 | Higgins et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4702260 | Wang | Oct 1987 | A |
4706687 | Rogers | Nov 1987 | A |
4776346 | Beraha et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4792327 | Swartz | Dec 1988 | A |
4832044 | Garg | May 1989 | A |
4844064 | Thimsen et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4844087 | Garg | Jul 1989 | A |
4850354 | McGurk-Burleson et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4893635 | de Groot et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4907598 | Bauer | Mar 1990 | A |
RE33258 | Onik et al. | Jul 1990 | E |
4940061 | Terwilliger et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4952817 | Bolan et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4958625 | Bates et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4967762 | DeVries | Nov 1990 | A |
4986278 | Ravid et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4986279 | O'Neill | Jan 1991 | A |
4986807 | Farr | Jan 1991 | A |
4989614 | Dejter, Jr. et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5025797 | Baran | Jun 1991 | A |
5048538 | Terwilliger et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5057822 | Hoffman | Oct 1991 | A |
5078603 | Cohen | Jan 1992 | A |
5125413 | Baran | Jun 1992 | A |
5138245 | Mattinger et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5146921 | Terwilliger et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5156160 | Bennett | Oct 1992 | A |
5158528 | Walker et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5172702 | Leigh et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5176628 | Charles et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5183052 | Terwilliger | Feb 1993 | A |
5197484 | Kornberg et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5211627 | William | May 1993 | A |
5223012 | Best et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5225763 | Krohn et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5234000 | Hakky et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5236334 | Bennett | Aug 1993 | A |
5242404 | Conley et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5249583 | Mallaby | Oct 1993 | A |
5254117 | Rigby | Oct 1993 | A |
5282476 | Terwilliger | Feb 1994 | A |
5282477 | Bauer | Feb 1994 | A |
5290253 | Kira | Mar 1994 | A |
5305762 | Acorn et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5324306 | Makower et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5334183 | Wuchinich | Aug 1994 | A |
5335671 | Clement | Aug 1994 | A |
5368029 | Holcombe et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5368045 | Clement et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5383874 | Jackson et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5397462 | Higashijima et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5400798 | Baran | Mar 1995 | A |
5439474 | Li | Aug 1995 | A |
5458112 | Weaver | Oct 1995 | A |
5469860 | DeSantis | Nov 1995 | A |
5471994 | Guirguis | Dec 1995 | A |
5479486 | Saji | Dec 1995 | A |
5485917 | Early | Jan 1996 | A |
5492130 | Chiou | Feb 1996 | A |
5496860 | Matsumoto et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5511556 | DeSantis | Apr 1996 | A |
5526822 | Burbank et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5535755 | Heske | Jul 1996 | A |
5546957 | Heske | Aug 1996 | A |
5554151 | Hinchliffe | Sep 1996 | A |
5560373 | De Santis | Oct 1996 | A |
5564436 | Hakky et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5569284 | Young et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5575293 | Miller et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5591170 | Spievack et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5601583 | Donahue et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5601585 | Banik et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5602449 | Krause et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5612738 | Kim | Mar 1997 | A |
5617874 | Baran | Apr 1997 | A |
5649547 | Ritchart et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5655542 | Weilandt | Aug 1997 | A |
5655657 | Roshdy | Aug 1997 | A |
5665101 | Becker et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5669394 | Bergey et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5699909 | Foster | Dec 1997 | A |
5700265 | Romano | Dec 1997 | A |
5709697 | Ratcliff et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5720760 | Becker et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5735264 | Siczek et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5752923 | Terwilliger | May 1998 | A |
5755714 | Murphy-Chutorian | May 1998 | A |
5766135 | Terwilliger | Jun 1998 | A |
5769086 | Ritchart et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5769795 | Terwilliger | Jun 1998 | A |
5775333 | Burbank et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5779649 | Herbert | Jul 1998 | A |
5788651 | Weilandt | Aug 1998 | A |
5792167 | Kablik et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5807282 | Fowler | Sep 1998 | A |
5817033 | DeSantis et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5817034 | Milliman et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5823970 | Terwilliger | Oct 1998 | A |
5827305 | Gordon | Oct 1998 | A |
5830219 | Bird et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
D403405 | Terwilliger | Dec 1998 | S |
5857982 | Milliman et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5871699 | Ruggeri | Feb 1999 | A |
5879365 | Whitfield et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5908233 | Heskett et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5913857 | Ritchart et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5916198 | Dillow | Jun 1999 | A |
5916229 | Evans | Jun 1999 | A |
5928164 | Burbank et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5944673 | Gregoire et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5951490 | Fowler | Sep 1999 | A |
5951575 | Bolduc et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5964716 | Gregoire et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5971939 | DeSantis et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5976164 | Bencini et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5980469 | Burbank et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5980545 | Pacala et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6007495 | Matula | Dec 1999 | A |
6007497 | Huitema | Dec 1999 | A |
6007556 | Kablik et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6017316 | Ritchart et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018227 | Kumar et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6019733 | Farascioni | Feb 2000 | A |
6022324 | Skinner | Feb 2000 | A |
6022325 | Siczek et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6027458 | Janssens | Feb 2000 | A |
6032673 | Savage et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6036657 | Milliman et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6050955 | Bryan et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055870 | Jaeger | May 2000 | A |
6071247 | Kennedy | Jun 2000 | A |
6077230 | Gregoire et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6083176 | Terwilliger | Jul 2000 | A |
6083237 | Huitema et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6086544 | Hibner et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6106484 | Terwilliger | Aug 2000 | A |
6110129 | Terwilliger | Aug 2000 | A |
6120462 | Hibner et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6123957 | Jernberg | Sep 2000 | A |
6126617 | Weilandt et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6142955 | Farascioni et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6162187 | Buzzard et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6165136 | Nishtala | Dec 2000 | A |
6193673 | Viola et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6196978 | Weilandt et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6213957 | Milliman et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6220248 | Voegele et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6231522 | Voegele et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241687 | Voegele et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6267759 | Quick | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6273861 | Bates et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6273862 | Privitera et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6280398 | Ritchart et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283925 | Terwilliger | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6322523 | Weilandt et al. | Nov 2001 | B2 |
6328701 | Terwilliger | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331166 | Burbank et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6358217 | Bourassa | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6402701 | Kaplan et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6419641 | Mark et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6428486 | Ritchart et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6428487 | Burdorff et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6432064 | Hibner et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6432065 | Burdorff et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434507 | Clayton et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6436054 | Viola et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6461302 | Thompson | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6471659 | Eggers et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6482158 | Mault | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6485436 | Truckai et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6488636 | Bryan et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6494844 | Van Bladel et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6527736 | Attinger et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6540694 | Van Bladel et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6540761 | Houser | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6544194 | Kortenbach et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6551255 | Van Bladel et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6554779 | Viola et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6585664 | Burdorff et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6585694 | Smith et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6586585 | Bastian | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6592530 | Farhadi | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6626849 | Huitema et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6632182 | Treat | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6638235 | Miller et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6656133 | Voegele et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6659105 | Burbank et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6659338 | Dittmann et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6683439 | Takano et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6689072 | Kaplan et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6695786 | Wang et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6702832 | Ross et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6712773 | Viola | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6712774 | Voegele et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6752768 | Burdorff et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6753671 | Harvey | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6755802 | Bell | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6758824 | Miller et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6764495 | Lee et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6832990 | Kortenbach et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6849080 | Lee et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6850159 | Mudge | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6860860 | Viola | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6875183 | Cervi | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6887210 | Quay | May 2005 | B2 |
6908440 | Fisher | Jun 2005 | B2 |
D508458 | Solland et al. | Aug 2005 | S |
6926676 | Turturro et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6984213 | Homer et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7004174 | Eggers et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7010332 | Irvin et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7025732 | Thompson et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
D525583 | Vu | Jul 2006 | S |
7108660 | Stephens et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7153274 | Stephens et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7156814 | Williamson, IV et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7182754 | Brigham et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7189206 | Quick et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7189207 | Viola | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7219867 | Kalis et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7226424 | Ritchart et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7252641 | Thompson et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7276032 | Hibner | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7328794 | Lubs et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7347828 | Francese et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7347829 | Mark et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7374544 | Freeman et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7390306 | Mark | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7397654 | Mori | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7402140 | Spero et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7405536 | Watts | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7407054 | Seiler et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7419472 | Hibner et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7432813 | Postma | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7452367 | Rassman et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7458940 | Miller | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7464040 | Joao | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7473232 | Teague | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7481775 | Weikel, Jr. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7490048 | Joao | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7491177 | Hibner | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7494473 | Eggers et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7497833 | Miller | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7510534 | Burdorff et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7513877 | Viola | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7517321 | McCullough et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7517322 | Weikel, Jr. et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7549978 | Carlson et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7575557 | Morton et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7648466 | Stephens et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7670299 | Beckman et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7717861 | Weikel et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7727164 | Cicenas et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7740594 | Hibner | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7740596 | Hibner | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7740597 | Cicenas et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7758515 | Hibner | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7762961 | Heske et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7806834 | Beckman et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7828746 | Teague | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7841991 | Douglas et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7846109 | Parihar et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7854706 | Hibner | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7862517 | Tsonton et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7862518 | Parihar | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7871384 | Thompson et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7883476 | Miller et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7883494 | Martin | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7906076 | Fischer | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7914462 | Hutchins et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7974681 | Wallace et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8002713 | Heske et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8016844 | Privitera et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8052615 | Reuber et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8057402 | Hibner et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8073008 | Mehta et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8075495 | Andreyko et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8083671 | Boulais et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8083687 | Parihar | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8109885 | Heske et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8118755 | Hibner et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8172771 | Miller et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8152738 | Li et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8187204 | Miller et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8190238 | Moll et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8206409 | Privitera et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8251916 | Speeg et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8262586 | Anderson et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8277393 | Miller et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8287465 | Hardin et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8313444 | Thompson et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8343069 | Uchiyama et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8430825 | Mark | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8430827 | Nicoson et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8956306 | Hibner | Feb 2015 | B2 |
20010007925 | Ritchart et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010011156 | Viola et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010012919 | Terwilliger | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010014779 | Burbank et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010034530 | Malackowski et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010044595 | Reydel et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010047183 | Privitera et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020000403 | Tanaka et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020029007 | Bryan et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020045840 | Voegele et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020065474 | Viola | May 2002 | A1 |
20020067151 | Tanishita | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020068878 | Jasonni et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082518 | Weiss et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020107043 | Adamson et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020115942 | Stanford et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120212 | Ritchart et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020143269 | Neuenfeldt | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020151822 | Burdorff et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156395 | Stephens et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030023188 | Kritzman et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023239 | Burbank et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030073929 | Baltschun et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030093103 | Malackowski et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030130593 | Gonzalez | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030130677 | Whitman et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030163142 | Paltieli et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030229293 | Hibner et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233101 | Lubock et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040015079 | Berger et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019297 | Angel | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040030367 | Yamaki et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034280 | Privitera et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040049128 | Miller et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040054299 | Burdorff et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040082915 | Kadan | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040092980 | Cesarini et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040092992 | Adams et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040162505 | Kaplan et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040167428 | Quick et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040186393 | Leigh et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040210161 | Burdorff et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215103 | Mueller, Jr. et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040220495 | Cahir et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040230135 | Merkle | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040230188 | Cioanta | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040249278 | Krause | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267157 | Miller et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004492 | Burbank et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050004559 | Quick et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050010131 | Burbank et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050020909 | Moctezuma de la Barrera et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050027210 | Miller | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050049489 | Foerster et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050049521 | Miller et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050054947 | Goldenberg | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065453 | Shabaz et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050080355 | Mark | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085838 | Thompson et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050088120 | Avis | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050101879 | Shidham et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113715 | Schwindt et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113716 | Mueller, Jr. et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050124914 | Dicarlo et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050124915 | Eggers et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050165328 | Heske et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165329 | Taylor et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050177117 | Crocker et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050193451 | Quistgaard et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203439 | Heske | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209530 | Pflueger | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050215921 | Hibner et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050275378 | Canino et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050277829 | Tsonton et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050277871 | Selis | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288605 | Pellegrino et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060030784 | Miller et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060074344 | Hibner | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060074345 | Hibner | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060074350 | Cash | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060113958 | Lobert et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060116603 | Shibazaki et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060122535 | Daum | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060129063 | Thompson et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149162 | Daw et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060178666 | Cosman et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060184063 | Miller | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200042 | Weikel, Jr. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060241515 | Jones et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060258956 | Haberstich et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060260994 | Mark et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070016101 | Feldman et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070027407 | Miller | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070032741 | Hibner et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070032743 | Hibner | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070055173 | DeLonzor et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073326 | Miller et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070090788 | Hansford et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070106176 | Mark | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118048 | Stephens et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118049 | Viola | May 2007 | A1 |
20070123797 | Krause | May 2007 | A1 |
20070161925 | Quick et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070167736 | Dietz et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070167782 | Callahan et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070167828 | Saadat | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070167943 | Janssen et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070179401 | Hibner | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070213590 | Squicciarini | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070213630 | Beckman et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070213632 | Okazaki et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070219572 | Deck et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070236180 | Rodgers | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070239067 | Hibner et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070255173 | Hibner | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270710 | Frass et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276288 | Khaw | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070287933 | Phan et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070292858 | Chen et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070293788 | Entrekin et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070293830 | Martin | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080004545 | Garrison | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080007217 | Riley | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015429 | Tsonton et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021487 | Heisler | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021488 | Berberich | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080030170 | Dacquay et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080064925 | Gill et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080064984 | Pflueger | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071193 | Reuber et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080079391 | Schroeck et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080103411 | Van Bladel et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080110261 | Randall et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080125634 | Ryan et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080135443 | Frojd et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080146962 | Ritchie et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080146965 | Privitera et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154151 | Ritchart et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080161682 | Kendrick et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080161718 | Schwindt | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080161719 | Miller et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080161720 | Nicoson et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183099 | Jorgensen et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080195066 | Speeg et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080200833 | Hardin et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080200836 | Speeg et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080208194 | Bickenbach | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080214955 | Speeg et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080215056 | Miller et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080221443 | Ritchie et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080221444 | Ritchie et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080221478 | Ritchie et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080221479 | Ritchie et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080221480 | Hibner et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228104 | Uber et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080232604 | Dufresne et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080234715 | Pesce et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080281225 | Spero et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080287826 | Videbaek et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080306406 | Thompson et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080308607 | Timm et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080319341 | Taylor et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090015208 | White et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030405 | Quick et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090048532 | Stephens et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090048533 | Miller | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090062624 | Neville | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090082695 | Whitehead | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090087249 | Flagle et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090088666 | Miller et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112118 | Quick, Jr. et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090125062 | Arnin | May 2009 | A1 |
20090137927 | Miller | May 2009 | A1 |
20090171242 | Hibner | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090204022 | Schwindt | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090227893 | Coonahan et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090281453 | Tsonton et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100030020 | Sanders et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100030108 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100063416 | Cicenas et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100106053 | Videbaek et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100152610 | Parihar et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100152611 | Parihar et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100160820 | Weikel, Jr. et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100160823 | Parihar et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100210966 | Videbaek | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100222700 | Hibner | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100234760 | Almazan | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100292607 | Moore et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100312140 | Smith et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100324449 | Rostaing et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110004119 | Hoffa et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110054350 | Videbaek | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110077551 | Videbaek | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110087131 | Videbaek | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110105945 | Videbaek et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110105946 | Sorensen et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110152715 | Delap et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110160611 | Ritchart et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110208085 | McCullough et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110224577 | Park | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110295150 | McCullough et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120071787 | Reuber et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120095366 | Heske et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120130275 | Chudzik et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120184873 | Jorgensen et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120191009 | Hoon et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120203135 | Heske et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120215130 | Field et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120238905 | Heske et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120310109 | Almazan | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120323120 | Taylor et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120323140 | Taylor et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120330185 | Coonahan et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130023791 | Thompson et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130289441 | Videbaek et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140228706 | Mccullough et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140371585 | Thompson et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150025415 | Videbaek et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150073301 | Videbaek et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150094613 | Jorgensen et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150133814 | Almazan | May 2015 | A1 |
20150148702 | Heske et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150190124 | Mccullough et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150238174 | Reuber et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150342579 | Heske et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160256138 | Videbaek et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160367229 | Jorgensen et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160374650 | Heske et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170042517 | Heske et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170181732 | Videbaek et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101011268 | Aug 2007 | CN |
101032420 | Sep 2007 | CN |
3924291 | Jan 1991 | DE |
4041614 | Oct 1992 | DE |
3924291 | Jul 2000 | DE |
10034297 | Apr 2001 | DE |
10026303 | Feb 2002 | DE |
20204363 | May 2002 | DE |
20209525 | Nov 2002 | DE |
10235480 | Feb 2004 | DE |
0433717 | Jun 1991 | EP |
0890339 | Jan 1999 | EP |
0995400 | Apr 2000 | EP |
1074271 | Feb 2001 | EP |
1520518 | Apr 2005 | EP |
1579809 | Sep 2005 | EP |
1604615 | Dec 2005 | EP |
1665989 | Jun 2006 | EP |
1829487 | Sep 2007 | EP |
2095772 | Sep 2009 | EP |
2106750 | Oct 2009 | EP |
1569561 | Oct 2010 | EP |
1345429 | Dec 1963 | FR |
2739293 | Apr 1997 | FR |
2018601 | Oct 1979 | GB |
1-126957 | Sep 1987 | JP |
H10508504 | Aug 1998 | JP |
2005530554 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2006509545 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2006528907 | Dec 2006 | JP |
2007502159 | Feb 2007 | JP |
9508945 | Apr 1995 | WO |
9628097 | Sep 1996 | WO |
9734531 | Sep 1997 | WO |
9825522 | Jun 1998 | WO |
9831285 | Jul 1998 | WO |
9835615 | Aug 1998 | WO |
9846290 | Oct 1998 | WO |
9933501 | Jul 1999 | WO |
0004832 | Feb 2000 | WO |
0030546 | Jun 2000 | WO |
0059378 | Oct 2000 | WO |
0172230 | Oct 2001 | WO |
0222023 | Mar 2002 | WO |
0232318 | Apr 2002 | WO |
02069808 | Sep 2002 | WO |
2005013830 | Feb 2005 | WO |
2006015302 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2007047128 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2007095330 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2007112751 | Oct 2007 | WO |
2008021687 | Feb 2008 | WO |
2008040812 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2008131362 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2011019343 | Feb 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Affix, www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/affix, printed Feb. 8, 2016, 4 pages. |
Definition of Channel by Merriam-Webster, www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/channel, printed Jan. 4, 2017 (15 pages). |
Definition of Therethrough by Merriam-Webster, www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/therethrough, printed Jan. 4, 2017 (10 pages). |
“Elongate”, www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/elongate, printed out on Dec. 5, 2017, 13 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130023789 A1 | Jan 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60862723 | Oct 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12446664 | US | |
Child | 13585238 | US |