The present invention is related to space-based solar power stations including a plurality of solar power satellite modules, as well as power generation tiles, which can be implemented within said satellite modules.
Space-based solar power (SBSP) describes the collection of solar power in space by a solar-power satellite or a satellite power system (SPS) and then the conversion and transmission of the power to a remote receiver for conversion back to electrical power. In an SBSP system, solar energy is collected as electrical energy on board, powering some manner of wireless power transmission to a receiver located remotely from the SBSP. The wireless power transmission application might include a microwave transmitter or laser emitter, which would direct its beam toward a collector, such as a power receiving rectenna at the remote location, such as, on the Earth's surface.
SBSP differs from ground-based solar collection methods in that the means used to collect energy resides on an orbiting satellite instead of on the Earth's surface. Basing such a system in space results in a higher collection rate for the solar energy due to the lack of a diffusing atmosphere. In a conventional ground-based system a large percentage (55-60%) of the solar energy is lost on its way through the atmosphere by the effects of reflection and absorption. Space-based solar power systems convert solar energy to a far-field emission such as microwaves outside the atmosphere, avoiding these losses. In addition, SBSP systems have a longer collection period and the ability to collect solar energy continuously without the downtime (and cosine losses, for fixed flat-plate collectors) that result from the Earth's rotation away from the sun.
A general limitation for conventional SBSP systems is the size of SPS required to generate sufficient electrical power from solar energy. For example, for a 500 MW system a 5 km2 platform may be required. Such a platform would be formed of large satellites on the order to tens to hundreds of tonnes/satellite. The launch costs associated with placing such large structures into orbit reduces the economic viability of such SBSP systems.
Systems and methods in accordance with various embodiments of the invention provide a space-based solar power (SBSP) system including a plurality of solar-power satellite modules, and constituent components thereof. In a number of embodiments, the satellite modules include a plurality of modular power generation tiles combining at least one photovoltaic cell, a power transmitter and circuitry configured to perform a variety of control functions including (but not limited to) coordinating the participation of the power transmitter in a phased array. Embodiments also provide compactible structures, and methods and mechanisms for deploying such compactible light weight structures once in a selected operating location. A plurality of the standalone satellite modules may be collocated, and flown in any suitable orbital formation in space to collectively constitute the space-based solar power system.
Many embodiments are directed to a space-based solar power station including, a plurality of unconnected satellite modules disposed in space in an orbital array formation, a plurality of power generation tiles disposed on each of the plurality of satellite modules, at least one photovoltaic cell disposed on each of the power generation tiles, at least one power transmitter collocated with the at least one photovoltaic cell on each of the power generation tiles and in signal communication therewith such that an electrical current generated by the collection of solar radiation by the at least one photovoltaic cell powers the at least one power transmitter, where each of the at least one power transmitters includes: an antenna, and control electronics that controls the phase of a radio frequency power signal that feeds the antenna so that the power transmitter is coordinated with power transmitters on other power generation tiles to form a phased array.
Numerous embodiments relate to efficient power generation tiles. In one embodiment, an efficient power generation tile includes: at least one photovoltaic material; and at least one concentrator that redirects incident solar radiation towards a photovoltaic material such that the photovoltaic material experiences a greater solar flux relative to the case where the photovoltaic material experiences unaltered solar radiation.
In another embodiment, a power generation tile further includes structures having characteristic dimensions between approximately 1 μm and 100 μm that are disposed on a surface in thermal communication with one of: at least one photovoltaic material and a concentrator.
In still another embodiment the at least one concentrator includes a reflector and a substrate.
In yet another embodiment, the reflector includes one of: aluminum, silver, a dielectric material, and combinations thereof.
In still yet another embodiment, the substrate includes KAPTON polyimide.
In a further embodiment, the thickness of the reflector is between approximately 2 μm and approximately 10 μm.
In a still further embodiment, the thickness of the KAPTON polyimide substrate is approximately 10 μm.
In a yet further embodiment, at least one photovoltaic cell includes a plurality of junctions.
In a still yet further embodiment, the at least one photovoltaic material is a plurality of photovoltaic materials; the at least one concentrator is a plurality of concentrators that are adjacently disposed; each of the at least one concentrators defines a reflective side and a non-reflective side; each of the at least one photovoltaic materials is disposed on the non-reflective side of a concentrator; and at least a plurality of the concentrators are configured to redirect incident solar radiation onto a photovoltaic material that is disposed on the non-reflective side of an adjacent concentrator.
In another embodiment, at least one concentrator includes a reflector disposed on a substrate, and further includes a spring.
In yet another embodiment, at least one concentrator includes a conductive reflector and a conductive spring.
In still another embodiment, at least one photovoltaic material is electrically connected to a conductive spring and to a conductive reflector and can thereby use them as electrical contacts.
In still yet another embodiment, at least one concentrator includes a reflector that includes two conductive portions that are electrically isolated except that they are each connected to a photovoltaic material such that the photovoltaic material can use the conductive portions as electrical contacts.
In a further embodiment, at least one concentrator includes two conductive springs, and at least one photovoltaic material is coupled with each of the two conductive springs such that it can use them as electrical contacts.
In a still further embodiment, at least one concentrator includes a primary reflector and a secondary reflector, where the primary reflector redirects incident solar radiation onto a secondary reflector, and where the secondary reflector redirects incident solar radiation onto at least one photovoltaic material.
In a yet further embodiment, the photovoltaic material is in thermal communication with the primary reflector.
In a still yet further embodiment, the primary reflector conforms to a parabolic shape and the secondary reflector conforms to a hyperbolic shape.
In another embodiment, an efficient power generation tile further includes a radiative heat sink in thermal communication with at least one photovoltaic cell.
In yet another embodiment, the at least one concentrator is parabolic in shape, and focuses incident solar radiation onto a photovoltaic material disposed proximate the focus of the parabolic shape.
In still another embodiment, the concentrator includes a reflector that includes one of: aluminum, silver, a dielectric material, and combinations thereof.
The features and advantages described in the specification are not all inclusive and, in particular, many additional features and advantages will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art in view of the drawings, specification, and claims. Moreover, it should be noted that the language used in the specification has been principally selected for readability and instructional purposes, and may not have been selected to delineate or circumscribe the inventive subject matter.
The description will be more fully understood with reference to the following figures and data graphs, which are presented as various embodiments of the disclosure and should not be construed as a complete recitation of the scope of the disclosure, wherein:
Turning now to the drawings, large-scale space-based solar power (SBSP) stations and efficient power generation tiles in accordance with various embodiments of the invention are illustrated. In many embodiments, the SBSP systems include arrays of independent satellite modules each incorporating arrays of independent solar electric power generation tiles. In several embodiments, the power generation tiles are each formed incorporating independent photovoltaic cells, power transmitters, and control circuits. The satellite modules and power generation tiles may be formed from compactible structures according to some embodiments. Methods for deploying, stabilizing, operating and constructing such large-scale space-based solar power systems in accordance with a number of embodiments of the invention are also described. Similar systems and methods are described in: U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/993,016 entitled “Large-Scale Space-Based Array: Packaging, Deployment and Stabilization of Lightweight Structures,” filed on May 14, 2014; U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/993,025 entitled “Large-Scale Space-Based Array: Multi-Scale Modular Space Power System,” filed on May 14, 2014; U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/993,957 entitled “Large-Scale Space-Based Array: Modular Phased Array Power Transmission,” filed May 15, 2014; U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/993,037 entitled “Large-Scale Space-Based Array: Space-Based Dynamic Power Distribution System,” filed May 14, 2014; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/712,812 entitled “Large-Scale Space-Based Solar Power Station: Packaging, Deployment and Stabilization of Lightweight Structures,” filed May 14, 2015; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/712,783 entitled “Large-Scale Space-Based Solar Power Station: Multi-Scale Modular Space Power,” filed May 14, 2015; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/712,856 entitled “Large-Scale Space-Based Solar Power Station: Power transmission Using Steerable Beams,” filed May 14, 2015, all of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
A large-scale space-based solar power station in accordance with many embodiments is a modular space-based construct that can be formed from a plurality of independent satellite modules placed into orbit within an orbital formation such that the position of each satellite module relative to each other is known. Each of the satellite modules can include a plurality of power generation tiles that capture solar radiation as electrical current and use the current to transmit the energy to one or more remote receivers using power transmitters. In many instances, the transmissions are generated using microwave power transmitters that are coordinated to act as a phased- and/or amplitude array capable of generating a steerable beam and/or focused beam that can be directed toward one or more remote receivers. In other embodiments, any of a variety of appropriate power transmission technologies can be utilized including (but not limited to) optical transmitters such as lasers.
Many embodiments relate to lightweight space structures used to construct the modular elements of the solar power station. Some lightweight space structures are used in the construction of the power generation tiles and/or satellite modules and may incorporate movable elements that allow the lightweight space structure to be compacted prior to deployment to reduce the area or dimensional length, height and/or width of the power generation tiles and/or satellite modules prior to deployment. The space structures may be made of any number, size and configuration of movable elements, and the elements may be configured to compact according to any suitable compacting mechanism or configuration, including one or two-dimensional compacting using, among others, z-folding, wrapping, rolling, fan-folding, double z-folding, Miura-ori, slip folding, wrapping, and combinations thereof. Some embodiments of movable elements are interrelated by hinges, such as, frictionless, latchable, ligament, and slippage hinges, among others. Some embodiments of structures are pre-stressed and/or provided with supportive frameworks to reduce out-of-plane macro- and micro-deformation of the lightweight structures. Structures and modules may include dynamic stabilizing movement (e.g., spinning) during deployment and/or operation. Deployment mechanisms to deploy the compactible lightweight structures into a deployed operational state may be incorporated into or associated with embodiments of the lightweight structures. Some deployment mechanisms may include (but are not limited to) expansive boom arms, centrifugal force mechanisms such as tip masses or module self-mass, among others.
Large-scale space-based solar power stations according to many embodiments utilize a distributed approach to capture solar radiation, and use the energy thus captured to operate power transmitters, which transmit power to one or more remote receivers (e.g., using laser or microwave emissions). The satellite modules of the solar power station can be physically independent structures, each comprising an independent array of power generation tiles. The satellite modules are each placed into a specified flying formation within an array of such satellite modules in a suitable orbit about the Earth. The position of each of the independent satellite modules in space within the orbital array formation is controllable via a combination of station-keeping thrusters and controlled forces from absorption, reflection, and emission of electromagnetic radiation, as well as guidance controls. Using such controllers each of the independent satellite modules may be positioned and maintained within the controlled orbital array formation relative to each of the other satellite modules so that each satellite module forms an independent modular element of the large-scale space-based solar power station. The solar radiation received by each of the power generation tiles of each of the independent satellite module is utilized to generate electricity, which powers one or more power transmitters on each of the power generation tiles. Collectively, the power transmitters on each of the power generation tiles can be configured as independent elements of a phased and/or amplitude-array.
The power generation tiles and/or satellite modules may also include separate electronics to process and exchange timing and control information with other power generation tiles and/or satellite modules within the large-scale space-based solar power station. In many implementations, the separate electronics form part of an integrated circuit that possesses the ability to independently determine a phase offset to apply to a reference signal based upon the position of an individual tile and/or transmitter element. In this way, coordination of a phased array of antennas can be achieved in a distributed manner.
In some embodiments of the distributive approach, different array elements of the phased array may be directed to transmit power with different transmission characteristics (e.g., phase) to one or more different remote power receiving collectors (e.g., ground based rectenna). Each satellite module of power generation tiles, or combinations of power generating tiles across one or more satellite modules, may thus be controlled to transmit energy to a different power receiving collector using the independent control circuitry and associated power transmitters.
A photovoltaic cell (PV) refers to an individual solar power collecting element on a power generation tile in a satellite module. The PV includes any electrical device that converts the energy of light directly into electricity by the photovoltaic effect including elements made from polysilicon and monocrystalline silicon, thin film solar cells that include amorphous silicon, CdTe and CIGS cells, multijunction cells, perovskite cells, organic/polymer cells, and various alternatives thereof.
A power transmitter or radiator refers to an individual radiative element on a power generation tile in a satellite module and its associated control circuitry. A power transmitter can include any device capable of converting power in the electrical current generated by the PV to a wireless signal, such as microwave radiation or light, including (but not limited to) a laser, a klystron, a traveling-wave tube, a gyrotron, or suitable transistor and/or diode. A power transmitter may also include suitable transmissive antennas, such as, dipole, patch, helical or spherical antennas, among others.
A phased array refers to an array of power transmitters in which the relative phases of the respective signals feeding the power transmitters are configured such that the effective radiation pattern of the power emission of the array is reinforced in a desired emission direction and suppressed in undesired directions. Phased arrays in accordance with embodiments may be dynamic or fixed, active or passive.
An orbital array formation refers to any size, number or configuration of independent satellite modules being flown in formation at a desired orbit in space such that the position of the satellite modules relative to each other is known such that power generation tiles on each of the satellite modules within the formation serves as an array element in the phased array of the solar power station.
A power generation tile refers to an individual solar power collecting and transmitting element in the phased array of the large-scale space-based solar power station. In many embodiments a power generation tile is a modular solar radiation collector, converter and transmitter that collects solar radiation through at least one photovoltaic cell disposed on the tile, and uses the electrical current to provide power to at least one power transmitter collocated on the same tile that transmits the converted power to one or more remote power receiving collectors. Many of the power generation tiles incorporated within a space-based solar power station include separate control electronics independently control the operation of the at least one power transmitter located on the power generation tile based upon timing, position, and/or control information that may be received from other tiles and/or other modules within the large-scale space-based solar power station. In this way, the separate control electronics can coordinate (in a distributed manner) the transmission characteristics of each of the power generation tiles form a phased array. Each power generation tile may also include other structures such as radiation collectors for focusing solar radiation on the photovoltaic, thermal radiators for regulating the temperature of the power generation tile, and radiation shielding, among other structures.
A satellite module refers to an array of power generation tiles collocated on a single integral space structure. The space structure of the satellite module may be a compactable structure such that the area occupied by the structure may be expanded or contracted depending on the configuration assumed. The satellite modules may include two or more power generation tiles. Each power generation tile may include at least one solar radiation collector and power transmitter. As discussed above, each of the power generation tiles may transmit power and may be independently controlled to form an array element of one or more phased arrays formed across the individual satellite module or several such satellite modules collectively. Alternatively, each of the power generation tiles collocated on a satellite module may be controlled centrally.
A lightweight space structure refers to integral structures of movably interrelated elements used in the construction of the power generation tiles and/or satellite modules that may be configurable between at least packaged and deployed positions wherein the area and or dimensions of the power generation tiles and/or satellite modules may be reduced or enlarged in at least one direction. The lightweight space structures may incorporate or be used in conjunction with deployment mechanisms providing a deploying force for urging the movable elements between deployed and compacted configurations.
A large-scale space-based solar power station or simply solar power station refers to a collection of satellite modules being flown in an orbital array formation designed to function as one or more phased arrays. In embodiments the one or more phased arrays may be operated to direct the collected solar radiation to one or more power receiving collectors.
Transmission characteristics of a power generation tile refer to any characteristics or parameters of the power transmitter of the power generation tile associated with transmitting the collected solar radiation to a power receiving collector via a far-field emission. The transmission characteristics may include, among others, the phase and operational timing of the power transmitter and the amount of power transmitted.
Structure of Large-Scale Space-Based Solar Power Station
A large-scale space-based solar power station including a plurality of satellite modules positioned in an orbital array formation in a geosynchronous orbit about the Earth in accordance with certain embodiments of the invention is illustrated in
In some embodiments, the satellite modules in the solar power station are spatially separated from each other by a predetermined distance. By increasing the spatial separation, the maneuverability of the modules in relation to each other is simplified. As discussed further below, the separation and relative orientation of the satellite modules can impact the ability of the power generation tile on each of the satellite modules to operate as elements within a phased array. In one embodiment, each satellite module 1A through NM may include its own station keeping and/or maneuvering propulsion system, guidance control, and related circuitry. Specifically, as illustrated in
In many embodiments, as illustrated in
Power generation tiles 112 according to many embodiments include a multicomponent structure including a photovoltaic cell 113, a power transmitter 114, and accompanying control electronics 115 electrically interconnected as required to suit the needs of the power transmission application. As illustrated in
In some embodiments, the PV 113 is a multi-layer cell, as illustrated in
In a number of embodiments, the power transmitters that are components of power generation tiles are implemented using a combination of control circuitry and one or more antennas. The control circuitry can provide the power generation tile with the computational capacity to determine the location of the power generation tile antenna(s) relative to other antennas within the satellite module and/or the solar power station. As can readily be appreciated, the relative phase of each element within a phased array is determined based upon the location of the element and a desired beam direction and/or focal point location. The control circuitry on each power generation tile can determine an appropriate phased offset to apply to a reference signal using a determined location of the power generation tile antenna(s) and beam-steering information. In certain embodiments, the control circuitry receives position information for the satellite module and utilizes the position information to determine the location of the power generation tile antenna(s) and determine a phase offset to apply to a reference signal. In other embodiments, a central processor within a satellite module can determine the locations of antennas on power generation tiles and/or phase offsets to apply and provides the location and/or phase offset information to individual power generation tiles.
In many embodiments, the positional information of each tile is received from partially redundant systems, such as, but not limited to, gyroscopes, accelerometers, electronic ranging radar, electronic positioning systems, phase and/or timing information from beacons, as well as employing a priori knowledge from system steering and flight control commands. In several embodiments, electronic systems are located on the ground, and/or in space on satellites deployed for this purpose (and, possibly, other purposes, e.g. in the case of using GPS satellites).
In a number of embodiments, position information may be relayed in a hierarchical fashion between modules, panels and/or tiles within the space-based solar power station, such that a central processing unit relays positional information such as location and orientation of the entire space-based solar power station with respect to a ground station and/or other suitable known locations to modules within the system. The relayed information can be expressed as an absolute and/or differential location(s), and/or orientation(s) as appropriate to the requirements of specific applications. In a similar fashion, the location and/or orientation of each module with respect to the center of the space-based solar power station or other suitable reference point can be determined at each module using processes similar to those outlined above. Furthermore, going down a hierarchical level, the position and orientation information of individual panels and tiles can be determined in a similar fashion. The entirety or any useful part of this information can be used at the tile-level, the panel-level, the module-level, the system-level and/or any combination thereof to control the phase and/or amplitude of each tile radiator to form a beam or focal spot on the ground. The aggregate computational power of the computational resources of each tile, panel and/or module can be utilized since each tile (and/or panel or module) can utilize its local computational power available from a DSP, microcontroller or other suitable computational resource to control its operation such that the system in aggregate generates the desired or close-to desired beam and/or focused transmission.
In various embodiments, as illustrated conceptually in
Although specific integrated circuit implementations are described above with reference to
In many embodiments, as illustrated conceptually in
In one embodiment, the power generation tiles and/or satellite modules may include other related circuitry. The other circuitry may include, among others, circuitry to control transmission characteristics of the power generation tiles, thermal management, inter or intra-module communications, and sensors to sense physical parameters, such as orientation, position, etc. The control circuitry may control transmission parameters such as phase and timing information such that the arrays of power generation tiles across each module and across the solar power station may be operated as independent array elements of one or more phased arrays. The sensors may include gyroscopes, GPS or IGS devices to estimate position and orientation, and thermocouples to estimate the temperature on the power generation tiles.
In one embodiment, the circuits for controlling transmission characteristic parameters may be collocated on the several power generation tiles or satellite modules and may control each transmitter of each power generation tile independently or in a synchronized manner such that the tiles operate as one or more element of one or more phased arrays. Reference signals (e.g., phase and timing) that can be used to synchronize the operation of the power generation tiles as a phased array may be generated locally on each power generation tile or satellite module and propagated via wired or wireless intra and inter-module communications links, or may be generated centrally from a single source on a single satellite module and propagated via wired or wireless intra and/or inter-module communications links across each of the satellite modules and power generation tiles. In addition, one or multiple timing reference signals may be generated from outside the space-based solar power station system such as one or more satellites flying in close proximity or even in different orbits; as well as from one or more ground stations.
Each power generation tile or satellite module may be operated independently or collectively as an element in a phased array. Entire or most operations associated with each individual power generation tile may be collocated on each of the power generation tiles or collectivized within the satellite module on which the power generation tiles are collocated, or across multiple satellite modules. In one embodiment, a central reference signal is generated and deviation (e.g., phase) from such reference signal is determined for each power generation tile array element of the phased array. By propagating a central reference signal from the reference signal, higher levels of control abstraction can be achieved to facilitate simpler programming for many operations of the phased array.
In some embodiments, each power generation tile of each satellite module may be the same or different. The number of distinct combinations of photovoltaic cells, transmission modules and control electronics may be as large as the number of power generation tiles in the satellite modules. Further, even where each of the power generation tiles on a satellite module are the same, each of the satellite modules 1A through NM or a group of satellite modules may have different solar radiation collection or transmission characteristics or may have arrays of power generation tiles of different sizes, shapes and configurations.
In certain embodiments, the solar power station is designed as a modular phased array where the plurality of satellite modules and power generating tiles located thereon form the array elements of the phased array. For this purpose, each of the satellite modules may be designed to be physically compatible with conventional launch vehicles although the achieved power generation of the phased array of the solar power station may exceed conventional space-based solar power satellites in many respects. Taking advantage of the increased performance, the solar power station phased array of the embodiment may include smaller payload size and overall array size to obtain equal or better power generation compared to conventional space-based solar power satellites. Alternatively, the size of the overall solar power station may be reduced compared to solar platforms in conventional solar power satellites while achieving comparable results.
In order to match the power generation of a conventional solar power satellite without increasing platform size or weight, the power collection, transmission and control logic for the individual power generation tiles is preferably collocated within each of the power generation tiles or within the satellite module on which the power generation tiles are collocated thus eliminating the need for intra- or inter-module communications, wiring or structural interconnection. In one embodiment, much of the power transmission control logic is a single collection of functions common to all or most of the power generating tiles. In this embodiment, the conventional external intra- and inter-power generation tile infrastructure for the solar power station may be entirely eliminated thus reducing the power generated per weight unit (W/kg).
In one embodiment, the phased array of the solar power station including the satellite modules and power generation tiles replaces a conventional monolithic solar power satellite. The solar power stations includes N×N satellite modules, each module including power generation tiles of
Table 1 lists example configurations of solar power stations according to embodiments replacing conventional solar power stations.
The Conventional SPS performance in Table 1 are taken from published literature. The Exemplary Phased Array System Performance in Table 1 are estimates and may differ based on the actual design parameters implemented.
The number of power generation tile array elements in each satellite module, and the number of satellite modules in the solar power station may be determined based on, among other factors, power requirements, payload restrictions, etc. A first factor for the size of an overall solar power station is the power to be generated at the power receiving rectenna. As illustrated in
In certain embodiments this limitation many also be overcome by dividing the power transmission output 176 of the solar power station 174 between different rectenna power receivers 178, as illustrated conceptually in
A second factor that may constrain the number of array elements in any satellite module is the issue of payload size and weight. Current payload delivery technologies for geosynchronous orbits range from 2,000 to 20,000 kg. Accordingly, the limit to the size of any single satellite module is the actual lift capacity of available payload delivery vehicles. Based on an assumption of 100 g/m2 for the phased array satellite modules according to embodiments, a 60×60 m satellite module would have a weight of 360 kg, well within the limits of current delivery technologies. Larger modules could be produced provided they are within the lift capacity of available lift vehicles.
In some embodiments, satellite modules are compactable such that the size of the satellite module in one or more dimensions may be reduced during delivery to overcome payload space constraints and then expanded into its final operating configuration. As illustrated in
In many embodiments the power generation tiles may have further compactible and expandable features and structures disposed thereon. In some embodiments of power generation tiles the photovoltaic cell and power transmitter may be movably interrelated through a compactable structure, such that when in a compacted or packaged configuration the elements of the power generating cell are compressed together to occupy a total volume lower than when in a deployed configuration. In some deployed configurations the photovoltaic cell and power transmitter are separated by a gap (e.g., to create a vertical offset therebetween). Certain embodiments having a compactable structure include motorized interconnections and resilient members such as spring or tension arms that are bent or under compression, among others. Such compactable structures may also incorporate packaging techniques such as one or a combination of z-folding, wrapping, rolling, fan-folding, double z-folding, Miura-ori, slip folding and symmetric wrapping may be used, among others.
The power generation tiles and/or satellite modules may include other structures to enhance the collection of solar radiation or transmission of power from the power generation tiles and/or satellite modules. Structures that may be incorporated into power generation tiles and/or satellite modules may include, among others, thermal radiators for controlling the thermal profile of the power generation tiles, light-collecting structures (e.g., radiators, reflectors and collectors) to enhance the efficiency of solar radiation collection to the photovoltaic cell, and radiation shielding to protect the photovoltaic cells, power transmitters and/or control electronics from space radiation. Such structures may also be independently compactible, between packaged and deployed configurations, as described above in relation to other elements of the power generation tiles.
A design for a satellite module or power generation tile may be applied to different satellite modules or power generation tiles. Other variables in the solar power station such as spatial distances, photovoltaics, power transmitter, control electronics and combinations with may be modified to produce a phased array with differing power collection and transmission characteristics. In this way, a diverse mix of solar power stations may be produced while maintaining the benefits of the modular solar power station described.
Compactable Space Structures
In many embodiments, the satellite modules of the solar power station employ compactible structures. Compactable structures allow for the satellite modules and/or power generation tiles to be packaged in a compacted form such that the volume occupied by the satellite module and/or power generation tiles can be reduced along at least dimension to allow for the satellite modules to fit within an assigned payload envelope within a delivery vehicle. Several exemplary embodiments of possible packaging schemes are provided, however, it should be understood that the packaging procedure and compactible structures may involve, among other procedures, using one and two-dimensional compaction techniques, including, one or a combination of z-folding, wrapping, rolling, fan-folding, double z-folding, Miura-ori, star folding, slip folding and wrapping.
In many embodiments a two-dimensional compacting technique may be utilized to package and deploy the satellite modules and/or power generation tiles.
In many embodiments a slip-wrapping compacting technique may be utilized to package and deploy the satellite modules and/or power generation tiles.
Some embodiments of a slip-wrap packing technique as applied to a compactible satellite module 350 are shown in a perspective view in
Using such techniques it is possible to significantly reduce the packaging volume of the satellite modules. In one exemplary embodiment where the compactible structures of a satellite module have a tile/panel thickness of 1 cm and a minimum bend radius of 10 cm, a satellite module with a deployed area of 60 m×60 m and being comprised of 30 such compactible structures would be compactible using the slip-wrap packaging technique into cylindrical package with a diameter of 5 m and a height of 2 m.
In many embodiments, the number of compactible elements in each of the satellite modules in a solar space station may be the same or different and may contain one or more power generation tiles collocated thereon. One or more compacting techniques may be used in packaging the compactible elements of each of the satellite modules and the techniques use may also the same or different. In many embodiments the compacting techniques utilized to package the satellite modules prior to deployment reduce the packaging volume of the satellite module in at least one dimension such that the satellite module fits within the allowed payload volume of the selected delivery vehicle.
In many embodiments, the power generation tiles may have further compactible and expandable features and structures disposed thereon. In some embodiments, power generation tiles, the photovoltaic cell, and power transmitter may be movably interrelated through a compactable structure, such that when in a compacted or packaged configuration the elements of the power generation tile are compressed together to occupy a total volume lower than when in a deployed configuration. In some deployed configurations the photovoltaic cell and power transmitter are separated by a gap (e.g., to create a vertical offset therebetween). Some embodiments of compactable structure include motorized interconnections and resilient members such as spring or tension arms that are bent or under compression, among others. Such compactable structures may also incorporate packaging techniques such as one or a combination of z-folding, wrapping, rolling, fan-folding, double z-folding, Miura-ori, slip folding and symmetric wrapping may be used, among others.
In many embodiments, deployment mechanisms are provided to deploy the compacted satellite modules (e.g., move the compactible elements of the satellite module from a compacted to a deployed configuration). In many embodiments, an active or passive mechanism is interconnected with one or more portions of the compactible structures of the satellite module such that when activated the compacted structures of the satellite modules may be expanded into a deployed operational configuration.
In some embodiments, a mechanically expandable member may be incorporated into the satellite module. An illustration of such a satellite module is provided in
In many embodiments the compactible structures of the satellite module may be configured such that motion of the satellite module provides the expansive deployable force. An illustration of one such embodiment is provided in
Regardless of the mechanism chosen, in many embodiments, the satellite module may be divided into any number and configuration of separate compactible structures with any number of hubs and deployment mechanisms (e.g., expandable members, weighted elements, etc.). In many embodiments, the compactible structures are attached along at least two edges to more than one deployment mechanism such that more even expansion of the compactible structures may be obtained. In many embodiments, for example, multiple weights or expandable members may be attached to each of the compactible structures along multiple points or edges of the compactible structures. Some expandable members or weighted elements may be incorporated into the structure of the compactible structures. Many embodiments of deployment mechanisms may include deployment controls to controllably operate the compactible structures of the satellite modules so that the satellite modules are expanded into a deployed configuration when desired. Some embodiments of such deployment controls may be automated, such that the positioning or motion of the satellite hub automatically engages the deployment mechanism, such as, for example, by spinning the satellite module at a specified rate. Other embodiments may incorporate control circuits such that an external signal or command is required to activate the deployment mechanism. Such deployment controls may operate across an entire satellite module, may be disposed individually in each power generation tile, or a combination thereof.
Efficient Power Generation Tile Configurations
In many embodiments, particularly efficient power generation tiles are implemented. The implementation of such power generation tiles within the described SBSP systems can make them more practicable insofar as they can offer greater power generation per unit mass. As can be appreciated, power generation tiles having a reduced mass can be advantageous for at least two reasons: (1) they can allow for reduced launch costs—i.e. a reduced payload can be cheaper to send into outer space; and (2) they can enable easier maneuverability of corresponding satellite modules. Against this backdrop, in many embodiments, thin film, pliable, photovoltaic materials that create an electrical current from solar radiation are implemented; the thin film photovoltaic materials can be used in conjunction with lightweight substrates for structural support. As can be appreciated, a photovoltaic material can be understood to be a contiguous material having a structure whereby the receipt of incident light (photons) excites electrons to a conduction band to a useful extent, and thereby allows for the creation of a useful electrical current. In a number of embodiments, concentrators are implemented that redirect solar radiation toward an associated photovoltaic material, such that the photovoltaic material can experience greater solar flux relative to the case where no concentrators are used. As can be appreciated, the amount of electrical current that a corresponding PV cell is able to produce is directly related to the incident solar radiation (accounting for its concentration/flux). In this way, for a given target power generation value, the utilization of concentrators can allow the amount of photovoltaic materials used, along with respective attendant radiative shielding (which can be relatively massive), to be reduced. In several embodiments, configurations are implemented that facilitate the radiative cooling of the photovoltaic materials, which can allow them to generate power more efficiently. In some embodiments, structures that are sized approximately on the order of wavelengths of thermally radiated light and are otherwise configured to effectively increase the emissivity of the of power generation tiles, and thereby contribute to the radiative cooling of the photovoltaic materials, are implemented.
In many embodiments, a thin film photovoltaic material is implemented, such as those used in a typical III-V solar cell, to produce electrical current from incident solar radiation. Thus, for instance, in many embodiments, a Gallium Arsenide thin film photovoltaic material is implemented, such as those developed by ALTADEVICES.
Notably, in many instances when photovoltaic materials are implemented in outer space, they are typically accompanied by radiation shields that protect them from deleterious radiation. The radiation shields are typically in the form of cover glass, which can be relatively massive. To provide context,
Moreover, in many embodiments power generation tile configurations are implemented that facilitate the cooling of the photovoltaic materials. As can be appreciated, photovoltaic materials can heat up extensively during operation, and heat can adversely impact a photovoltaic material's ability to produce electrical current. To provide context, an energy balance for a sample solar cell in operation is depicted in
Against this backdrop, in many embodiments, configurations are implemented that provide improved power generation per unit mass. For instance, in many embodiments concentrators are implemented that concentrate solar radiation onto a corresponding photovoltaic material such that the photovoltaic material experiences greater solar flux relative to if the photovoltaic material were subjected to unaltered solar radiation. As can be appreciated a photovoltaic material's ability to generate electrical current is related to the amount of incident solar radiation/flux. Note that concentrators can be made to be less massive than the combined mass of conventional PV Cells including radiation shielding. Accordingly, the incorporation of concentrators can reduce the amount of photovoltaic material for a given desired power generation value, and can correspondingly reduce the amount of radiation shielding implemented.
The concentrators can take any suitable form in accordance with many embodiments of the invention. For example, in many embodiments, concentrators are implemented in the form of an aluminum film disposed on a KAPTON Polyimide film produced by DUPONT. In several embodiments, the aluminum has a thickness of between approximately 2 μm and approximately 10 μm. In many embodiments, the KAPTON Polyimide film has a thickness of approximately 10 μm. In effect, the aluminum acts as the reflective surface (i.e. a ‘reflector’), while the KAPTON polyimide film acts as a supportive substrate. Note that while several illustrative dimensions are referenced, it should be clear that the structures can adopt any suitable dimension in accordance with embodiments of the invention. It should also be clear that concentrators can be implemented using any of a variety of materials, not just those recited above—e.g. reflectors and substrates can comprise any suitable material in accordance with embodiments of the invention. For example, in many embodiments, a silver reflective surface is incorporated. The incorporation of silver can be advantageous insofar as silver has a relatively lower optical loss over that portion of the electromagnetic spectrum characterized by wavelengths of approximately 300 nm to approximately 900 nm relative to aluminum. In a number of embodiments, a dielectric reflector is implemented within a concentrator. The utilization of a dielectric reflector can be advantageous insofar as it can be made to not overly interfere with any desired electromagnetic transmissions (or any other transmission). For example, where the corresponding SBSP station is transmitting generated power via microwaves, dielectric reflective surfaces can be implemented that do not overly interfere (if at all) with the transmission. In any case, while several materials have been mentioned for the construction of concentrators, it should be clear that the concentrators can be implemented using any of a variety of suitable materials in accordance with many embodiments of the invention, and are not restricted to construction from the above-recited materials.
Importantly, concentrators can be implemented in any of a variety of geometric configurations. For example, in many embodiments, Cassegrain configurations are implemented; Cassegrain configurations are typically characterized by primary and secondary reflectors that redirect solar radiation onto a photovoltaic material (typically disposed on the primary reflector). Typically, a primary reflector redirects incident solar radiation onto a secondary reflector, which subsequently redirects incident solar radiation onto a photovoltaic material. Note that a reflector can be understood to be that portion of a concentrator which directly reflects incident solar radiation. For example,
Note that the reflectors implemented in Cassegrain structures can incorporate any of a variety of complementary shapes to redirect—and focus—solar radiation onto a photovoltaic material. For example, in many embodiments, a primary reflector conforming to a parabolic shape is implemented, while a corresponding secondary reflector that conforms to a hyperbolic shape is implemented. Moreover, the particular characteristics of the parabolic and hyperbolic shapes can be adjusted based on the requirements of a particular application. For instance, the parabolic and hyperbolic shapes can be made to be wider or narrower based on desired design criteria. To be clear though, any suitable pairing of reflector shapes that redirect solar radiation onto a photovoltaic material can be implemented in accordance with embodiments of the invention, and not just those conforming to parabolic/hyperbolic shapes.
Cassegrain structures, such as those illustrated in
While Cassegrain structures can exhibit advantageous thermal properties, they can be sensitive to solar radiation angle of incidence. For example, the secondary reflector can cast a shadow and thereby hinder solar flux received by the primary reflector, and eventually the photovoltaic material. Additionally, because of the somewhat sophisticated geometry, some angles at which solar radiation reaches the corresponding power generation tile may not be received. Moreover, because Cassegrain structures employ two reflectors, they are subject to more reflection loss relative to configurations that employ only a single reflector.
While Cassegrain structures have been discussed, it should be clear that any of a variety of concentrator configurations can be implemented in accordance with certain embodiments of the invention. For example, in many embodiments, ‘Parabolic Trough’ configurations are implemented. Parabolic Trough configurations are similar to the Cassegrain structures discussed above, except that they do not include a secondary reflector; rather the primary reflector is used to redirect solar radiation onto an opposingly disposed photovoltaic material. For example,
While the reflector can conform to any shape that redirects solar radiation to a photovoltaic material in accordance with certain embodiments of the invention, it can be advantageous if it conforms to a parabolic shape so as to efficiently focus solar radiation onto the opposingly disposed photovoltaic material. Additionally, as can be appreciated from the discussion above, the configurations can be implemented using any of a variety of materials. For example, in many embodiments, the concentrator is implemented using a reflective surface, such as aluminum, silver, and/or a dielectric material, in conjunction with a lightweight substrate. Additionally, the photovoltaic material can be any suitable material, such as—but not limited to—thin film photovoltaics produced by ALTADEVICES.
Parabolic Trough configurations can be advantageous relative to Cassegrain structures in that, since they only employ a single reflector (as opposed to two reflectors), they are subject to less reflective loss relative to Cassegrain structures that implement two reflectors. However, as the photovoltaic material is not typically directly coupled to a large surface area such as the primary reflector (as in the case of a Cassegrain structure), Parabolic Trough configurations may not be as efficient at radiative heat transfer.
In many embodiments, a ‘Venetian Blinds’ configuration is implemented, whereby concentrators redirect solar radiation towards photovoltaic materials that are disposed on the backside of adjacently disposed concentrators.
Venetian Blinds configurations can be constructed using any of a variety of materials and techniques in accordance with many embodiments of the invention. For example, in several embodiments, Venetian Blinds configurations are implemented using polyimide films in conjunction with carbon springs, and reflectors.
To provide context,
Venetian Blinds configurations can be advantageous insofar as each of the concentrators can act as a heat sink for a coupled photovoltaic material, thereby facilitating conductive and radiative cooling, and consequently a more efficient operation. Additionally, in contrast to the Cassegrain configuration, only a single reflector is used in redirecting solar radiation onto a photovoltaic material. As alluded to above, using a single reflector can reduce the potential energy loss relative to configurations that incorporate a plurality of reflectors. In many instances, optical efficiencies of greater than 90% can be realized using Venetian Blind configurations. Moreover, such configurations can result in concentrations of between approximately 10× to approximately 40× or more.
As noted above, the number of junctions within a photovoltaic material also influences the power generation efficiency. Interestingly,
While fins can be used to facilitate thermal radiation, and consequently result in the cooling of the photovoltaic cell allowing it to operate more efficiently, in many embodiments, microscale structures are further incorporated to facilitate thermal radiation. For instance, in several embodiments, structures that have dimensions approximately on the order of wavelengths of thermally radiated light are incorporated onto a surface that is interconnected with (or otherwise in thermal communication with) a photovoltaic material or a concentrator surface; in particular, the structures can cause thermally generated infrared photons to interact with the material to a greater extent, and can thereby allow for greater overall thermal radiation, which in turn causes higher cooling rates. This can be understood as the inverse process of increasing absorption of incident photons by surface texturing, as described by Kirchoff's law of thermal radiation, which states that the emissivity of an arbitrary body is equal to its absorptivity. In general, structures with characteristic dimensions approximately on the order of wavelengths of thermally radiated light (inclusive of dimensions between approximately 1 μm and approximately 100 μm or more) can modify the absorptivity/emissivity of a material by causing optical resonances. A plurality of these structures can be implemented so as to create a ‘textured’ surface. In general, when such surfaces are interconnected with (e.g. in thermal communication with) the photovoltaic material or else a concentrator surface, they can facilitate its cooling via conduction and radiation. For example, in many embodiments, implemented microstructures have characteristic dimensions of between approximately 1 μm and approximately 100 μm. In several embodiments, implemented microstructures have characteristic dimensions between approximately 5 μm and approximately 50 μm. While certain dimensions are referenced, it should be clear that features of any suitable dimension that can texture a surface so as to increase its emissivity can be incorporated in accordance with embodiments of the invention.
In many embodiments, the contacts used by PV Cells are integrated so as to facilitate the efficiency of the power generation tile. For instance, in many embodiments, conductive structures that already exist within a power generation tile are used as the conductive contacts of constituent PV Cells. In this way, the conductive structures are made to be dual purpose. For example, in many embodiments, a Venetian Blinds configuration is implemented that includes a conductive reflector as well as carbon springs for structural support, and the conductive reflector and/or the carbon springs are used as the electrical contacts for the PV Cell. This can be achieved in any of a variety of ways.
For instance,
In many embodiments, a reflector is used to implement the contacts for a PV cell. For example,
In numerous embodiments, carbon springs within a power generation tile act as the contacts for a PV cell. For example,
To provide context,
While particular embodiments and applications of the present invention have been illustrated and described herein, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the precise construction and components disclosed herein and that various modifications, changes, and variations may be made in the arrangement, operation, and details of the methods and apparatuses of the present invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as it is defined in the appended claims.
This application claims priority to U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 62/006,604 entitled “Large-Scale Space-Based Array: Efficient Photovoltaic Structures for Space,” filed Jun. 2, 2014; and U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 62/120,650 entitled “Large-Scale Space-Based Array: Packaging, Deployment and Stabilization of Lightweight Structures,” filed Feb. 25, 2015; both of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2599944 | Salisbury et al. | Jun 1952 | A |
3152260 | Cummiogs et al. | Oct 1964 | A |
3419433 | Slifer, Jr. | Dec 1968 | A |
3427200 | Philip et al. | Feb 1969 | A |
3433677 | Robinson et al. | Mar 1969 | A |
3437527 | Iles | Apr 1969 | A |
3457427 | Tarneja et al. | Jul 1969 | A |
3489915 | Richard et al. | Jan 1970 | A |
3530009 | Dick et al. | Sep 1970 | A |
3532299 | Baker et al. | Oct 1970 | A |
3562020 | Blevins | Feb 1971 | A |
3611652 | Rabenhorst et al. | Oct 1971 | A |
3616528 | Goldsmith et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3627585 | Neville et al. | Dec 1971 | A |
3636539 | Gaddy | Jan 1972 | A |
3698958 | Baker et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3730457 | Williams et al. | May 1973 | A |
3735943 | Fayet et al. | May 1973 | A |
3758051 | Williams | Sep 1973 | A |
3781647 | Glaser et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
3785590 | Wentworth | Jan 1974 | A |
3793082 | Roger | Feb 1974 | A |
3805622 | Kinard | Apr 1974 | A |
3809337 | Andrews et al. | May 1974 | A |
3817477 | Okumura et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3848821 | Scheel et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
3863870 | Andrews | Feb 1975 | A |
3952324 | Wolff et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
3989994 | Brown et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4078747 | Minovitch et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4116258 | Slysh et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4133501 | Pentlicki | Jan 1979 | A |
4151872 | Slysh et al. | May 1979 | A |
4153474 | Rex | May 1979 | A |
4155524 | Marello et al. | May 1979 | A |
4166919 | Carlson | Sep 1979 | A |
4234856 | Jung et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4282394 | Nordwall et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4328389 | Peterson et al. | May 1982 | A |
4415759 | Copeland et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4416052 | Stern et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4419532 | Severns et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4687880 | Morris et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4735488 | Rancourt et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4780726 | Archer et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4784700 | Mildice et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4789989 | Stern et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4850031 | Allsop et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4947825 | Moriarty | Aug 1990 | A |
4953190 | Kukoleck et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5013128 | Stern et al. | May 1991 | A |
5114101 | Stern et al. | May 1992 | A |
5131955 | Lawrence et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5154777 | Stone et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5177396 | Gielen et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5180441 | Cornwall et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5226107 | Stern et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5280441 | Wada et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5309925 | Policastro | May 1994 | A |
5310141 | Grob et al. | May 1994 | A |
5337980 | Homer et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5344496 | Stern | Sep 1994 | A |
5404868 | Sankrithi | Apr 1995 | A |
5428483 | Sato et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5487791 | Everman et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5496414 | Harvey et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5502451 | Rainville et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5512913 | Staney | Apr 1996 | A |
5520747 | Marks et al. | May 1996 | A |
5569332 | Glatfelter et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5623119 | Yater et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5653222 | Newman | Aug 1997 | A |
5666127 | Kochiyama et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5785280 | Baghdasarian | Jul 1998 | A |
5885367 | Whalen et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5909299 | Sheldon, Jr. et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5909860 | Lee et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5969695 | Bassily et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5984484 | Kruer | Nov 1999 | A |
6017002 | Stribling, Jr. et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6031178 | Kester | Feb 2000 | A |
6043425 | Assad | Mar 2000 | A |
6050526 | Stribling et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6060790 | Craig, Jr. et al. | May 2000 | A |
6091017 | Stern et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6118067 | Lashley et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6150995 | Gilger et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6188012 | Ralph et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6194790 | Griffin et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195067 | Gilger et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6284967 | Seifert et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6300558 | Takamoto | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6343442 | Marks et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6366255 | Chiang et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6366256 | Ramanujam et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6369545 | Williams et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6394395 | Poturalski et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6423895 | Foster et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6429368 | Summers et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6528716 | Collette et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6534705 | Berrios et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6541916 | Decker et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6547190 | Lim et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6555740 | Roth et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6557804 | Carroll et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6560942 | Warren et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6565044 | Johnson et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6577130 | Adamo et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6587263 | Chen et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6590150 | Kiefer et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6635507 | Karam et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6655638 | Deel et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6660927 | Zwanenburg | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6660928 | Sinharoy et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6689952 | Kawaguchi et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6690252 | Scoltock, Jr. et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6713670 | Stern et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6735838 | Triller et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6735920 | Cadogan et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6768048 | Woll et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6784359 | Zuckermandel et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6799742 | Nakamura et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6882072 | Wingett et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6897730 | Dupuis et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6903261 | Collette et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6904749 | Joshi et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6909042 | Viale et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6936760 | Spirnak et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6983914 | Stribling et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7006039 | Miyamoto et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7053294 | Tuttle et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7077361 | Rabinowitz | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7138960 | Carroll et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7163179 | Taylor et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7211722 | Murphy | May 2007 | B1 |
7271333 | Yehle et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7301095 | Murphy et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7303166 | Geery et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7319189 | Collette et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7354033 | Murphey et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7392011 | Jacomb-Hood | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7464895 | Palmer et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7474249 | Williams et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7486431 | Rabinowitz et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7564149 | Weinbrenner et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7564628 | Barth et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7568479 | Rabinowitz et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7612284 | Spirnak et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7736007 | Rabinowitz et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7866836 | Rabinowitz et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7878667 | Rabinowitz et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7895795 | Murphey et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7960641 | Rabinowitz | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8071873 | Rabinowitz | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8146867 | Jordan et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8215298 | Klotz | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8308111 | Lu et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8432224 | Woo et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8439511 | Stern et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8616502 | Stribling et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8636253 | Schmid et al. | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8683755 | Spence et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8872018 | Breen et al. | Oct 2014 | B1 |
9004410 | Stern et al. | Apr 2015 | B1 |
9079673 | Stern et al. | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9120583 | Spence et al. | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9156568 | Spence et al. | Oct 2015 | B1 |
9248922 | Baghdasarian et al. | Feb 2016 | B1 |
9276148 | Jaffe et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9346566 | Spence et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9444394 | Thomas et al. | Sep 2016 | B1 |
9709349 | Raman et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
10144533 | Atwater et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10340698 | Pellegrino et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10454565 | Pellegrino et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10696428 | Pellegrino et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10749593 | Hajimiri et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10992253 | Atwater et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
11128179 | Hajimiri et al. | Sep 2021 | B2 |
20020007845 | Collette et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020029796 | Mikami et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020029797 | Mikami et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020032992 | Roth et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020134423 | Eller et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030098057 | Mizuno et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030098058 | Takada et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030192586 | Takada et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030196298 | Hinkley et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040011395 | Nicoletti et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040140930 | Harles | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040187912 | Takamoto et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040231718 | Umeno et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050046977 | Shifman | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050178921 | Stribling et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050241691 | Wakefield et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050257823 | Zwanenburg et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060038083 | Criswell | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060109053 | Kim et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060157103 | Sheats et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060186274 | Wang et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060234694 | Kawasaki et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070029446 | Mosher et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070087704 | Gilberton | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070137690 | Bruning | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080000232 | Rogers et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080055177 | Dixon | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080088409 | Okada | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080149162 | Martinelli et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080173349 | Liu et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080185039 | Chan | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080251113 | Horne et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080283109 | Mankins et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090126792 | Gruhlke et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090133738 | Shiao et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090151769 | Corbin | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090199893 | Bita et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090223554 | Sharps et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090250094 | Robison et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090301544 | Minelli et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090308451 | Oesterle et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100170560 | Sapienza et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100180946 | Gruhlke et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100224231 | Hoke | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100263709 | Norman et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100269885 | Benitez et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100276547 | Rubenchik et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100289342 | Maness | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100300507 | Heng et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100319774 | Schwartz et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110041894 | Liao | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110049992 | Sant'Anselmo et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110061718 | Fork et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110080135 | Bland | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110100425 | Osamura | May 2011 | A1 |
20110120524 | Wares et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110122016 | Lomes et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110203574 | Harding | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110210209 | Taylor et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110232718 | Nawab | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110300664 | Chung et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110315192 | Swatek et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120019942 | Morgan et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120024362 | Gossman | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120031393 | Linderman et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120041122 | Hidaka et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120125415 | Tischler et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120138749 | Ellinghaus et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120138997 | Tasaki | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120160299 | Reid et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120243252 | Kim | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130009851 | Danesh | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130032673 | Kobayashi et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130093287 | Biso | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130099599 | Jaffe et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130133730 | Pan et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130220399 | Gruhlke et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130233974 | Maiboroda et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130234645 | Goei et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130319504 | Yang et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130319505 | Yang et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130332093 | Adest et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140041705 | Kang et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140083479 | Takayama et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140102686 | Yu et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140131023 | Raman et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140148197 | Shields et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140150865 | Kwon | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140158197 | Rubenstein et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140159636 | Yang et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140261621 | Gruhlke et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140261622 | Floyd et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140263844 | Cook, Jr. et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140263847 | Eskenazi et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140326833 | Spence et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140356613 | Weisenberger et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150022909 | O'Neill | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150053253 | O'Neill | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150130293 | Hajimiri et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150144740 | Richardson et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150155413 | Pokharna et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150217876 | Halsband | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150244304 | Ozeki et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150270426 | Funo et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20160065006 | Woods | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160122041 | Abrams et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160164451 | McEnaney et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160376037 | Pellegrino et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160380486 | Hajimiri et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160380580 | Atwater et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170021947 | Pellegrino et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170025992 | Atwater et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170047463 | Hajimiri et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170047886 | Atwater et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170047889 | Atwater et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170047987 | Pellegrino et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170063296 | Cruijssen et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20180315877 | Kelzenberg et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2833826 | Nov 2012 | CA |
2833862 | May 2014 | CA |
104158471 | Nov 2014 | CN |
0541052 | May 1993 | EP |
977273 | Feb 2000 | EP |
0977273 | Feb 2000 | EP |
0996170 | Apr 2000 | EP |
1501132 | Jan 2005 | EP |
976655 | Sep 2005 | EP |
1852919 | Nov 2007 | EP |
1852919 | Feb 2009 | EP |
2318045 | May 2011 | EP |
3149777 | Apr 2017 | EP |
3325347 | May 2018 | EP |
3334655 | Jun 2018 | EP |
3334655 | Mar 2021 | EP |
3334655 | Mar 2021 | EP |
3325347 | Jun 2021 | EP |
2956774 | Aug 2011 | FR |
2247564 | Mar 1992 | GB |
6298781 | May 1987 | JP |
63254772 | Oct 1988 | JP |
0369258 | Jul 1991 | JP |
05107328 | Apr 1993 | JP |
06253477 | Sep 1994 | JP |
H06327173 | Nov 1994 | JP |
082500 | Sep 1996 | JP |
2000114571 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2001088799 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2001309581 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2002095189 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002362500 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2003164077 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2003164078 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2003191899 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2004090817 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2004196051 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004253471 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2004296658 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2009184603 | Aug 2009 | JP |
2010259301 | Nov 2010 | JP |
6640116 | Jan 2020 | JP |
6693889 | Apr 2020 | JP |
6715317 | Jun 2020 | JP |
6918776 | Jul 2021 | JP |
2004049538 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO2008-073905 | Jun 2008 | WO |
2009124098 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2010033632 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2011006506 | Jan 2011 | WO |
2011062785 | May 2011 | WO |
2011067772 | Jun 2011 | WO |
2011109275 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2011062785 | Nov 2011 | WO |
2015175839 | Nov 2015 | WO |
2015175839 | Nov 2015 | WO |
2015179213 | Nov 2015 | WO |
2015179214 | Nov 2015 | WO |
2015187221 | Dec 2015 | WO |
2015187739 | Dec 2015 | WO |
2017015508 | Jan 2017 | WO |
2017015605 | Jan 2017 | WO |
2017027615 | Feb 2017 | WO |
2017027617 | Feb 2017 | WO |
2017027629 | Feb 2017 | WO |
2017027633 | Feb 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
US 10,291,030 B2, 05/2019, Pellegrino et al. (withdrawn) |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2015/030900, Completed Aug. 11, 2015, dated Aug. 13, 2015, 11 pgs. |
Arya et al., “Wrapping Thick Membranes with Slipping Folds”, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, date unknown, pp. 1-17. |
Delapierre et al., “Spin-Stabilized Membrane Antenna Structures”, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, date unknown, pp. 1-15. |
NASA TV, “Solar Power, Origami-Style”, printed Aug. 14, 2014 from http://www.nasa.gov/jpl/news/origami-style-power-20140814, 4 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2015/033841, Report Completed Sep. 10, 2015, dated Sep. 11, 2015, 11 pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2015/030900, dated Nov. 15, 2016, dated Nov. 24, 2016, 9 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2015/030909, dated Nov. 15, 2016, dated Nov. 24, 2016, 11 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2015/033841, dated Dec. 6, 2016, dated Dec. 15, 2016, 8 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2015/030895, completed Nov. 27, 2015, dated Nov. 30, 2015, 14 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2015/030909, completed Nov. 27, 2015, dated Nov. 27, 2015, 13 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/043424, completed Nov. 15, 2016, dated Nov. 15, 2016, 14 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/043677, completed Oct. 21, 2016, dated Oct. 21, 2016, 8 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/046389, completed Nov. 22, 2016, dated Nov. 22, 2016, 11 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/046394, completed Nov. 17, 2016, dated Nov. 17, 2016, 12 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/046415, completed Nov. 17, 2016, dated Nov. 17, 2016, 10 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/046421, completed Nov. 17, 2016, dated Nov. 17, 2016, 10 Pgs. |
Aieta et al., “Multiwavelength achromatic metasurfaces by dispersive phase compensation”, Science, vol. 347, Issue 6228, DOI:10.1126/science.aaa2494, Mar. 20, 2015, pp. 1342-1345. |
Aoki et al., “A Fully Integrated Quad-Band GSM/GPRS Power Amplifier”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 43, Issue 12, Dec. 12, 2008, pp. 2747-2758. |
Bakr et al., “Impact of phase and amplitude errors on array performance”, UC Berkeley Technical Report No. UCB/EECS-2009-1. Retrieved from http://www.eecs.berkeley.com/Pubs/TechRpts/2009/EECS-2009-1.html, Jan. 1, 2009, 12 pgs. |
Bohn et al., “Fully Integrated Frequency and Phase Generation for a 6-18GHz Tunable Multi-Band Phased-Array Receiver in CMOS”, Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium (RFIC), Apr. 17-Jun. 17, 2008. IEEE, pp. 439-442. |
Brongersma et al., “Light management for photovoltaics using high-index nanostructures”, Nature Materials, vol. 13, No. 25, May 2014, pp. 451-460. |
Callahan et al., “Light trapping in ultrathin silicon photonic crystal superlattices with randomly-textured dielectric incouplers”, Optics Express, vol. 21, Issue 25, DOI: 10.1364/OE.21.030315, 2013, pp. 30315-30326. |
Campbell et al., “A Pixel Readout Chip for Mrad in Standard 0.25um CMOS”, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 46, issue: 3, Jun. 1999, pp. 156-160. |
Cao et al., “A 4.5MGy TID-Tolerant CMOS Bandgap Reference Circuit Using a Dynamic Base Leakage Compensation Technique”, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 60, issue 4, Aug. 2013, pp. 2819-2824. |
Geisz et al., “Infrared Reflective and Transparent Inverted Metamorphic Triple Junction Solar Cells”, AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1277, Issue 11, pp. 11-15, Oct. 14, 2010. |
Kaltenbrunner et al., “Flexible high power-per-weight perovskite solar cells with chromium oxide-metal contacts for improved stability in air”, Nature Materials, vol. 14, doi:10.1038/nmat4388, Aug. 24, 2015, pp. 1032-1039. |
Lacoe, R. C. , “Improving Integrated Circuit Performance Through the Application of Hardness-by-Design Methodology”, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 55, issue: 4, Aug. 2008, pp. 1903-1925. |
Lamoureux et al., “Dynamic kirigami structures for integrated solar tracking”, Nature Communications, DOI:10.1038/ncomms9092, Sep. 8, 2015, pp. 1-6. |
Lohmeyer et al., “Correlation of GEO communication satellite anomalies and space weather phenomena: Improved satellite performance and risk mitigation”, paper presented at 30th AIAA International Communications Satellite Systems Conference (ICSSC), Ottawa, Canada, pp. 1-20, Jul. 13, 2012. |
Messenger et al., “Status of Implementation of Displacement Damage Dose Method for Space Solar Cell Degradation Analyses”, 2008 Dd EOL Calc via SPENVIS manuscript SRM2, Jan. 2008, 8 pgs. |
Narita et al., “Development of high accuracy phase control method for space solar power system”, Proc. IEEE International Microwave Workshop Series on Innovative Wireless Power Transmission: Technologies, Systems, and Applications, May 12-13, 2011, p. 227-230. |
Nishioka et al., “Evaluation of temperature characteristics of high-efficiency InGaP/InGaAs/Ge triple-junction solar cells under concentration”, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 85, Issue 3, Jan. 31, 2005, pp. 429-436. |
O'Brien et al., “The AE9/AP9 Radiation Specification Development”, Aerospace Corporation, Sep. 15, 2009, Report No. TOR-2009(3905)-8, 29 pgs. |
Petrovic et al., “Design Methodology for Fault Tolerant ASICs”, IEEE 15th International Symposium, Design and Diagnostics of Electronic Circuits & Systems (DDECS), Apr. 18-20, 2012, pp. 8-12. |
Rephaeli et al., “Ultrabroadband Photonic Structures to Achieve High-Performance Daytime Radiative Cooling”, Nano Letters, vol. 13, Mar. 5, 2013, pp. 1457-1461. |
Sato et al., “Modeling of degradation behavior of InGaP/GaAs/Ge triple-junction space solar cell exposed to charged particles”, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 105, 2009, pp. 044504-1-044504-6. |
Silverman et al., “Outdoor Performance of a Thin-Film Gallium-Arsenide Photovoltaic Module”, presented at the 39th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialist Conference, Conference Jun. 16-21, 2013, Tampa, Florida, USA, 6 pgs. |
Snoeys et al., “Integrated Circuits for Particle Physics Experiments”, IEEE Journal Solid-State Circuits, vol. 35, issue 12, Dec. 2000, pp. 2018-2030. |
Wang et al., “A Broadband Self-Healing Phase Synthesis Scheme”, Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium (RFIC), IEEE, Jun. 5-7, 2011, 4 pgs. |
ATI Industrial, Multi-Axis Force / Torque Sensor, ATI Industrial Automation, Jul. 23, 2014, pp. 1-44. |
Smooth on, Mold Max® XLS® II, Jan. 15, 2016, 2 pgs. |
“AZ Technology | Materials, Paint and Coatings: AZ-93 White Thermal Control, Electrically Conductive Paint / Coating (AZ's Z-93P)”, Available http://www.aztechnology.com/materials-coatings-az-93.html, Accessed: Dec. 19, 2016, 2 pgs. |
“ESA. Composite material structures.”, printed Jun. 29, 2017 from http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Space_Engineering_Technology/Structures/Composite_Materials_structures, Oct. 20, 2014, 2 pgs. |
“Orbital ATK”, Coilable Boom Systems. Technical report, Oct. 18, 1989, 2 pgs. |
“Space solar power limitless clean energy from space”, National Space Society, printed Jun. 29, 2017 from http://www.nss.org/settlement/ssp/, May 2017, 11 pgs. |
Aguirre-Martinez et al., “Development of a Continuous Manufacturing Method for a Deployable Satellite Mast in Cfrp”, 15th Reinforced Plastics Congress, Sep. 1986, pp. 107-110, 1986. |
Aieta et al., “Aberration-Free Ultrathin Flat Lenses and Axicons at Telecom Wavelengths Based on Plasmonic Metasurfaces”, Nano Lett., Web publication date Aug. 2, 2012, vol. 12, No. 9, pp. 4932-4936. |
Amacher et al., “Thin ply composites: Experimental characterization and modeling of size-effects”, Composites Science and Technology, Jul. 11, 2014, vol. 101, pp. 121-132. |
Andryieuski et al., “Rough metal and dielectric layers make an even better hyperbolic metamaterial absorber”, Optics Express, Jun. 11, 2014, vol. 22, No. 12, pp. 14975-14980. |
Arai, “Pitch-based carbon fiber with low modulus and high heat conduction”, Nippon Steel Technical Report No. 84, Jul. 11, 2001, pp. 12-17. |
Arbabi et al., “Dielectric Metasurfaces for Complete Control of Phase and Polarization with Subwavelength Spatial Resolution and High Transmission”, Nature Nanotechnology, Aug. 31, 2015, 27 pgs., doi:10.1038/nnano.2015.186. |
Arya, “Packaging and Deployment of Large Planar Spacecraft Structures”, Thesis of Manan Arya, May 2, 2016, 131 pgs. |
Arya et al., “Ultralight Structures for Space Solar Power Satellites”, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2016, pp. 1-18. |
Banik et al., “Performance Validation of the Triangular Rollable and Collapsible Mast”, Proceedings of the 24th Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites, Logan, UT, Aug. 9, 2010, 8 pgs. |
Bapanapalli et al., “The Effect of Tool-Part Interactions on the Geometry of Laminated Composites”, Washington State University, Jul. 10, 2016. |
Biddy et al., “LightSail-1 solar sail design and qualification”, Proceedings of the 41st Aerospace Mechanisms Symposium, May 16, 2012, pp. 451-463. |
Cahill et al., “Nanoscale thermal transport. II. 2003-2012”, Applied Physics Review, Jan. 14, 2014, vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 011305-1-011305-45. |
Calladine et al., “The theory of thin shell structures 1888-1988”, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, vol. 202, No. 3, Jan. 7, 1988, pp. 141-149. |
Castle Jr., “Heat conduction in carbon materials”, 1st Biennial Conference of the American Carbon Society, pp. 13-19, Nov. 2, 1953. |
Chen et al., “Planar Heterojunction Perovskite Solar Cells via Vapor-Assisted Solution Process”, Journal of the American Chemical Society 136, Dec. 20, 2013, pp. 622-625. |
Cheng et al., “Optical metasurfaces for beam scanning in space”, Optics Letters, May 1, 2014, vol. 39, No. 9, pp. 2719-2722. |
David, “Extraterrestrial mining could reap riches and spur exploration”, http://www.space.com/16273-extraterrestrial-mining-asteroids-moon.html, Jun. 25, 2012, 7 pgs. |
Du Toit et al., “Advances in the design of Jaumann absorbers”, in Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, 1990. AP-S. Merging Technologies for the 90's. Digest., May 7, 1990, vol. 3, pp. 1212-1215. |
Elfiky et al., “Study the effects of proton irradiation on GaAs/Ge solar cells”, 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialist Conference, Jul. 2010, pp. 002528-002532. |
Emerson, “Electromagnetic wave absorbers and anechoic chambers through the years”, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 21, No. 4, Jul. 1973, pp. 484-490. |
Eperon et al., “Morphological Control for High Performance, Solution-Processed Planar Heterojunction Perovskite Solar Cells”, Advanced Functional Materials 24, first published Sep. 9, 2013, pp. 151-157. |
Ersoy et al., “An experimental method to study the frictional processes during composites manufacturing”, Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, Feb. 19, 2005, vol. 36, No. 11, pp. 1536-1544. |
Estvanko et al., “Numerical analysis of a tape spring hinge folded about two axes”, Earth and Space 2012 © Engineering, Science, Construction, and Operations in Challenging Environments, ASCE, Jul. 11, 2012, pp. 714-721. |
Fallahi et al., “Thin wideband radar absorbers”, Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Nov. 30, 2010, vol. 58, No. 12, pp. 4051-4058. |
Fante et al., “Reflection properties of the Salisbury screen”, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Oct. 1988, vol. 36, No. 10, pp. 1443-1454. |
Fernandez, “Advanced Deployable Shell-Based Composite Booms for Small Satellite Structural Applications Including Solar Sails”, International Symposium on Solar Sailing, Jan. 17-20, 2017, Kyoto, Japan, 19 pgs. |
Fernlund, “Experimental and numerical study of the effect of cure cycle, tool surface, geometry, and lay-up on the dimensional fidelity of autoclave-processed composite parts”, Composites—Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 33(3):341-351, 2002. |
Herbeck et al., “Development and test of deployable ultra-lightweight CFRP-booms for a Solar Sail”, European Space Agency, (Special Publication) ESA SP, 49(468):107-112, 2001. |
Hillebrandt et al., “The Boom Design of the De-Orbit Sail Satellite”, European Conference on Spacecraft Structures, Materials and Mechanical Testing, European Conference on Spacecraft Structures, Materials & Environmental Testing, Apr. 1-4, 2014, Braunschweig, Germany, 8 pgs. |
Huang et al., “Gate-tunable conducting oxide metasurfaces”, Nano Letters, vol. 16, No. 9., web publication date Aug. 26, 2016, pp. 5319-5325. |
Irwin et al., “Low-Mass Deployable Spacecraft Booms”, AIAA Space 2010 Conference & Exposition, pp. 1-11, Aug. 30, 2010. |
Jang et al., “Tunable large resonant absorption in a midinfrared graphene Salisbury screen”, Physical Review. B, Oct. 8, 2014, vol. 90, No. 16, pp. 165409-1-165409-5. |
Kelly, “On Kirchhoff's law and its generalized application to absorption and emission by cavities”, Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards—B, Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, Jul.-Sep. 1965, vol. 69B, No. 3, pp. 165-171. |
Kildishev et al., “Planar Photonics with Metasurfaces”, Science, Mar. 15, 2013, vol. 339, No. 6125, pp. 1232009-1-1232009-6. |
Knott et al., “Performance Degradation of Jaumann Absorbers Due to Curvature”, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Jan. 1980, vol. AP28, No. 1, pp. 137-139. |
Kryder et al., “Heat Assisted Magnetic Recording”, Proceeding of the IEEE, current version published Dec. 2, 2008, vol. 96, No. 11, pp. 1810-1835. |
Leclerc et al., “Characterization of Ultra-Thin Composite Triangular Rollable and Collapsible Booms”, 4th AIAA Spacecraft Structures Conference, AIAA SciTech Forum, Jan. 2017, 15 pgs. |
Liang et al., “Additive Enhanced Crystallization of Solution-Processed Perovskite for Highly Efficient Planar-Heterojunction Solar Cells”, Advanced Materials, Mar. 14, 2014, vol. 26, pp. 3748-3754. |
Luukkonen et al., “A thin electromagnetic absorber for wide incidence angles and both polarizations”, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation Jul. 28, 2009, pp. 3119-3125. |
Mankins, “A technical overview of the “SunTower” solar power satellite concept”, Acta Astronautica, 50(6):369-377, Mar. 1, 2002. |
Messenger et al., “Quantifying low energy proton damage in multijunction solar cell”, in the proceedings of the 19th Space photovoltaic research and technology conference, 2005, NASA/CP-2007-214494, pp. 8-17. |
Miyazawa et al., “Evaluation of radiation tolerance of perovskite solar cell for use in space”, Photovoltaic Specialist Conference (PVSC), 2015 IEEE 42nd, New Orleans, LA, USA, Dec. 17, 2015, pp. 1-4, published Jun. 1, 2015. |
Mizuno et al., “A black body absorber from vertically aligned single-walled carbon nanotubes”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., Apr. 14, 2009, vol. 106, No. 15, pp. 6044-6047. |
Narimanov et al., “Reduced reflection from roughened hyperbolic metamaterial”, Optics Express, Jun. 17, 2013, vol. 21, No. 12, pp. 14956-14961. |
Ni et al., “Metasurface holograms for visible light”, Nature Communications, Nov. 15, 2013, vol. 4, pp. 1-6. |
NTPT, “NTPT Thin prepreg 402”, Data sheet, Version 1.6, May 11, 2017, 5 pgs. |
O'Hara, “Mechanical properties of silicone rubber in a closed volume”, Technical Report, Army Armament Research and Development Center, Dec. 1983, 21 pgs. |
Pellegrino, “AAReST telescope architecture”, obtained from http://www.pellegrino.caltech.edu/aarest2/, printed Jul. 5, 2017, 4 pgs. |
Penjuri, “Simulation and Testing of Deployable CFRP Booms for Large Space Structures”, PhD thesis, Aug. 2011, 118 pgs. |
Pors et al., “Analog Computing Using Reflective Plasmonic Metasurfaces”, Nano Lett., Dec. 18, 2014, vol. 15, pp. 791-797. |
Radford et al., “Measurement of Manufacturing Distortion in Flat Composite Laminates”, International Conference on Composite Materials, Jul. 1999, 9 pgs. |
Radford et al., “Separating Sources of Manufacturing Distortion in Laminated Composites”, Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, first published May 1, 2000, vol. 19, No. Aug. 2000, pp. 621-641. |
Rakic et al., “Algorithm for the determination of intrinsic optical constants of metal films: application to aluminum”, Applied Optics, Aug. 1, 1995, vol. 34, No. 22, pp. 4755-4767. |
Rakic et al., “Optical Properties of Metallic Films for Vertical-Cavity Optoelectronic Devices”, Applied Optics, Aug. 1, 1998, vol. 37, No. 22, pp. 5271-5283. |
Raman et al., “Passive radiative cooling below ambient air temperature under direct sunlight”, Nature, Nov. 27, 2014, vol. 515, pp. 540-544. |
Reha et al., “A Dual-Band Rectangular CPW Folded Slot Antenna for GNSS Applications”, International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical, Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering, Aug. 2014, pp. 11055-11061. |
Rephaeli et al., “Absorber and emitter for solar thermo-photovoltaic systems to achieve efficiency exceeding the Shockley-Queisser limit”, Optics. Express, Aug. 11, 2009, vol. 17, No. 17, pp. 15145-15159. |
Santer et al., “Composite Tube Flexures at Nanosatellite Scale”, 4th AIAA Space-craft Structures Conference, Jan. 9-13, 2017, 12 pgs. |
Sasaki, “How Japan plans to build an orbital solar farm”, printed from https://energy.gov/articles/space-based-solar-power, published Apr. 24, 2014. |
Seffen et al., “Deployment dynamics of tape springs”, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Mar. 9, 1999, vol. 455, pp. 1003-1048. |
Shaltout et al., “Time-varying metasurfaces and Lorentz non-reciprocity”, Optical Materials Express, Nov. 1, 2015, vol. 5, No. 11, pp. 2459-2467. |
Shin-Etsu, “Meeting the increasingly diverse and sophisticated needs of industry with the unique properties of silicone rubbers”, Characteristic properties of Silicone Rubber Compounds, 2013, 16 pgs. |
Sickinger et al., “Lightweight deployable booms: Design, manufacture, verification, and smart materials application”, 55th International Astronautical Congress, Vancouver, Canada, Oct. 4-8, 2004, pp. 1-11. |
Sihn et al., “Experimental studies of thin-ply laminated composites”, Composites Science and Technology, May 1, 2007, vol. 67, pp. 996-1008. |
Silva et al., “Performing Mathematical Operations with Metamaterials”, Science, Jan. 10, 2014, vol. 343, No. 6167, pp. 160-163. |
Stabile et al., “Coiling dynamic analysis of thin-walled composite deployable boom”, Composite Structures, Mar. 29, 2014, vol. 113, pp. 429-436. |
Steeves, “Multilayer Active Shell Mirrors”, Thesis of John Steeves, May 5, 2015, 164 pgs. |
Streyer et al., “Strong absorption and selective emission from engineered metals with dielectric coatings”, Optics Express , Apr. 8, 2013, vol. 21, No. 7, pp. 9113-9122. |
Stuart et al., “Absorption enhancement in silicon-on-insulator waveguides using metal island films,”, Appl. Phys. Lett., Oct. 14, 1996, vol. 69, No. 16, pp. 2327-2329. |
Stuart et al., “Island size effects in nanoparticle-enhanced photodetectors”, Appl. Phys. Lett., Dec. 28, 1998, vol. 73, No. 26, pp. 3815-3817. |
Svanberg et al., “An experimental investigation on mechanisms for manufacturing induced shape distortions in homogeneous and balanced laminates”, Composites—Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, Jun. 1, 2001, vol. 32, pp. 827-838. |
Torayca, “T800H Technical Data Sheet”, Technical report No. CFA-007, 2 pgs. |
Walker et al., “An investigation of tape spring fold curvature”, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Dynamics and Control of Systems and Structures in Space, Citeseer, 2004, 10 pgs. |
Walters et al., “Spenvis implementation of end-of-life solar cell calculations using the displacement damage dose methodology”, in the Proceedings of the 19th Space Photovoltaic Research and Technology Conference, Feb. 1, 2007, 9 pgs. |
Weinberg et al., “Radiation and temperature effects in gallium arsenide, indium phosphide, and silicon solar cells”, National Aeronautics and Space Administration Technical Memorandum 89870, May 4-8, 1987, 14 pgs., published Feb. 1, 1987. |
Wells et al., “Metamaterials-based Salisbury screens with reduced angular sensitivity”, Appl. Phys. Lett., Oct. 21, 2014, vol. 105, pp. 161105-1-161105-4. |
White et al., “Cure Cycle Optimization for the Reduction of Processing-Induced Residual Stresses in Composite Materials”, Journal of Composite Materials, Dec. 1, 1993, vol. 27, No. 14, pp. 1352-1378. |
Whorton et al., “Nanosail-D: the first flight demonstration of solar sails for nanosatellites”, 22nd AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites, Aug. 11, 2008, pp. 1-6. |
Wood, “Space-based solar power”, printed Jul. 5, 2017 from https://energy.gov/articles/space-based-solar-power, Mar. 6, 2014, 7 pgs. |
Wu et al., “Retarding the crystallization of Pbl2 for highly reproducible planar-structured perovskite solar cells via sequential deposition”, Energy & Environmental Science 7, Jun. 24, 2014, pp. 2934-2938. |
Yamaguchi, “Radiation-resistant solar cells for space use”, Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, 2001. vol. 68, pp. 31-53. |
Yamaguchi et al., “Correlations for damage in diffused-junction InP solar cells induced by electron and proton irradiation”, Journal of Applied Physics, May 1, 1997, vol. 81, No. 9, 6013-6018. |
Yamaguchi et al., “Mechanism for the anomalous degradation of Si solar cells induced by high fluence 1 MeV electron irradiation”, Applied Physics Letters, May 27, 1996, vol. 68, No. 22, pp. 3141-3143. |
Yu et al., “A Broadband, Background-Free Quarter-Wave Plate Based on Plasmonic Metasurfaces”, Nano Letters, Nov. 3, 2012, vol. 12, No. 12, pp. 6328-6333. |
Yu et al., “Flat optics with designer metasurfaces”, Nature Materials, published online Feb. 2014, vol. 13, pp. 139-150. |
Zhang et al., “Infrared Refractive Index and Extinction Coefficient of Polyimide Films”, International Journal of Thermophysics, May 1, 1998, vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 905-916. |
Zheng et al., “Metasurface holograms reaching 80% efficiency”, Nature Nanotechnology, published online Feb. 23, 2015, pp. 1-6. |
Zhu et al., “Radiative cooling of solar cells”, Optica, Jul. 22, 2014, vol. 1, pp. 32-38. |
Zhu et al., “Radiative cooling of solar absorbers using a visibly transparent photonic crystal thermal blackbody”, PNAS, Oct. 6, 2015, vol. 112, pp. 12282-12287. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2016/043424, Report dated May 15, 2018, dated May 24, 2018, 12 Pgs. |
DuPont Kapton, Mar. 2012, 26 pgs. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 15795587.3, Search completed Feb. 5, 2018, dated Feb. 12, 2018, 7 Pgs. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 15803447.0, Search completed Oct. 17, 2017, dated Oct. 25, 2017, 10 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2016/043424, Report completed Dec. 2, 2017, dated Dec. 15, 2017, 153 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2016/043677, Report dated Jan. 23, 2018, dated Feb. 1, 2018, 6 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2016/046389, Report dated Feb. 13, 2018, dated Feb. 22, 2018, 9 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2016/046394, Report dated Feb. 13, 2018, dated Feb. 22, 2018, 10 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2016/046415, Report dated Feb. 13, 2018, dated Feb. 22, 2018, 8 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2016/046421, Report dated Feb. 13, 2018, dated Feb. 22, 2018, 8 Pgs. |
“Corona Resistant Kapton CR Takes Electrical Insulation Design and Reliability to New Levels”, Kapton, DuPont Films, H-54506-1. |
“DuPont Kapton 100CRC: Technical Data Sheet”, kapton.dupont.com, Jul. 2014, K-28402. |
“DuPont Kapton 120FWN616B”, kapton.dupont.com, K-28459, Sep. 2014. |
“DuPont Kapton 150FCRC019”, kapton.dupont.com, K-28402, Jun. 2014. |
“DuPont Kapton 150FWN019: Magnet Wire Insulation”, www.kapton.dupont.com, H-78319-01, Mar. 2005. |
“DuPont Kapton 150FWR019: Insulation Substrate”, www.dupont.com/kapton, H-78312, Nov. 2001. |
“DuPont Kapton 150PRN411”, kapton.com, K-28731, Dec. 2014. |
“DuPont Kapton 200FWR919: Insulation Substrate”, www.dupont.com/kapton, H-78313, Nov. 2001. |
“DuPont Kapton 200RS100”, kapton.com, K-15354-2, Sep. 2014. |
“DuPont Kapton B: Technical Bulletin”, kapton.dupont.com, K-25099-1, Jul. 2013. |
“DuPont Kapton FCR: Advanced Magnet Wire Insulation”, Jun. 2005, H-99888. |
“DuPont Kapton FN: Polyimide Film”, kapton.com, K-15347-2, Jun. 2015. |
“DuPont Kapton FPC: Polyimide Film”, kapton.dupont.com, K-15361, Mar. 2006. |
“DuPont Kapton GS Polyimide Film: Technical Data Sheet”, kapton.dupont.com, K-26875-1, Jul. 2014. |
“DuPont Kapton HN:Polyimide Film”, kapton.dupont.com, K-15345-1, Apr. 2011. |
“DuPont Kapton HPP-ST: Polyimide Film”, kapton.dupont.com, K-15357, Mar. 2006. |
“DuPont Kapton MT: Technical Data Sheet”, kapton.dupont.com, H-38497-3, Apr. 2014. |
“DuPont Kapton PST: Polyimide Film”, kapton.dupont.com, K-10790, Nov. 2005. |
“DuPont Kapton PV9100 Series: Polyimide Films”, kapton.dupont.com, K-26028-1_A4, Oct. 2012. |
“DuPont Kapton: Polyimide Film”, kapton.dupont.com, Mar. 2012, H-38479-9, 7 pgs. |
Arbabi et al., “Multiwavelength polarization insensitive lenses based on dielectric metasurfaces with meta-molecules”, Optics, Jan. 22, 2016, vol. 3, Issue 6, pp. 628-633. |
Arbabi et al., “Subwavelength-thick lenses with high numerical apertures and large efficiency based on high-contrast transmitarrays”, Nature Communications, May 5, 2015, vol. 6, pp. 7069, doi:10.1038/ncomms8069. |
Lee et al., “Non-Destructive Wafer Recycling for Low-Cost Thin-Film Flexible Optoelectronics”, Advanced Functional Materials, Apr. 2, 2014, vol. 24, pp. 4284-4291. |
Liu et al., “Microstructure, thermal shock resistance and thermal emissivity of plasma sprayed LaMAI11 O19(M=Mg, Fe) coatings for metallic thermal protection systems”, Applied Surface Science, vol. 271, Feb. 6, 2013, pp. 52-59. |
Vaccaro et al., “In-flight experiment for combined planar antennas and solar cells (SOLANT)”, IET Microwaves Antennas & Propaga, vol. 3, No. 8, Dec. 1, 2009, pp. 1279-1287. |
Jaffe et al., “Development of a Sandwich Module Prototype for Space Solar Power”, 2012 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Mar. 3-10, 2012, Big Sky, MT, USA, pp. 1-9, DOI: 10.1109/AERO.2012.6187077. |
Jaffe et al., “Energy Conversion and Transmission Modules for Space Solar Power”, Proceedings of the IEEE, Jun. 2013, vol. 101, No. 6, pp. 1424-1437, DOI: 10.1109/JPROC.2013.2252591. |
Mankins, “SPS-Alpha: The First Practical Solar Power Satellite via Arbitrarily Large Phased Array (A 2011-2012 NASA NIAC Phase 1 Project)”, Artemis Innovation Management Solutions LLC, Sep. 15, 2012, NIAC Phase 1 Final Report, 113 pgs. |
Rubenchik et al., “Solar Power Beaming: From Space to Earth”, U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information, Apr. 14, 2009, Technical Report LLNL-TR-412782, 16 pgs. DOI: 10.2172/952766. |
Sasaki et al., “A new concept of solar power satellite: Tethered-SPS”, Acta Astronautica, 2006, vol. 60, pp. 153-165, doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2006.07.010. |
Borriello et al., “Ab initio investigation of hybrid organic-inorganic perovskites based on tin halides”, Physical Review B, Jun. 23, 2008, vol. 77, 235214, 9 pgs. |
Conings et al., “Intrinsic thermal instability of methylammonium lead trihalide perovskite”, Advanced Energy Materials, Jun. 2, 2015, DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201500477, 8 pgs. |
Preston et al., “From plasmon spectra of metallic to vibron spectra of dielectric nanoparticles”, Accounts of Chemical Research, Jan. 9, 2012, vol. 45, No. 9, pp. 1501-1510. |
Scholl et al., “Quantum plasmon resonances of individual metallic nanoparticles”, Nature, Mar. 22, 2012, vol. 483, doi:10.1038/nature10904, pp. 421-428. |
Tsai et al., “High-efficiency two-dimensional Ruddlesden-Popper perovskite solar cells”, Nature, Aug. 18, 2016, vol. 536, doi:10.1038/nature18306, 15 pgs. |
Weinberg et al., “Radiation and temperature effects in gallium arsenide, indium phosphide, and silicon solar cells”, NASA Technical Memorandum 89870, Washington, D.C., May 4-8, 1987, 14 pgs. |
Zhang et al., “Intrinsic instability of the hybrid halide perovskite semiconductor CH3NH3Pbl3”, Chinese Physics Letters, Jun. 3, 2015, vol. 35, No. 3, 036104, 11 pgs. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 16828571.6, Search completed Mar. 18, 2019, dated Mar. 22, 2019, 17 Pgs. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 16835856.2, Search completed Feb. 22, 2019 dated Mar. 1, 2019, 8 Pgs. |
Romeo et al., “Unique space telescope concepts using CFRP composite thin-shelled mirrors and structures”, 2007. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160056321 A1 | Feb 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62006604 | Jun 2014 | US | |
62120650 | Feb 2015 | US |