A field of the invention is analyte collection. Embodiments of the invention may be useful, for example, in analyte detection and analysis systems and methods, as might be used for the collection, detection, and analysis of a wide range of vapors or gases, particulate, and/or liquid bound analytes.
Analyte detection is becoming increasingly important as a security and safety measure. Transportation, commercial, government, educational, and other facilities have a need for the sensitive and rapid detection of analytes, such as (but not limited to) those that are indicative of explosives or other substances that pose a threat. In addition, in industrial, residential, and commercial settings analyte detection can provide warning of particles or vapors that pose a health or safety risk. Example analytes that can be detected include hazardous materials such as but not limited to explosive-related materials, toxic industrial chemicals (TICS), or chemical or biological agents.
Analysis instruments have been developed and are under development to meet the need for detection of analytes. A non-limiting example analysis instrument currently being used in both portable and larger forms is the Ion Mobility Spectrometer (IMS). More particular examples of an IMS include the GE Vapor Tracer models, though other types of IMS may be used. Speed and sensitivity are primary concerns, and thus researchers and manufacturers seek to improve the speed and sensitivity of such analysis instruments.
A typical IMS device has separate particle and vapor modes. In a particle mode, an assembly is affixed to the device to accept and desorb particles from a substrate such as a swab (though other substrates are possible). The swab, for example, may be inserted into the assembly and heated to vaporize any collected particulates. The vapor is directed via vacuum into the instrument for analysis. Another assembly can be affixed to the device for vapor mode, a mode in which the device collects vapors for analyte detection.
Preconcentrators offer the opportunity to enhance the performance of any type of analysis instrument by increasing the concentration of analyte in a volume of fluid sent for analysis. Generally, preconcentrators collect analyte over a period of time (during adsorption) and then provide a concentrated fluid stream to the analysis instrument (during desorption).
Rapid preconcentration requires rapid heating. Accordingly, successful microscale preconcentrators have advantages regarding cycling and desorption, as heating to accomplish desorption can be conducted quickly and with low power. Example microscale preconcentrators are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,257,835 to Manginell et al., entitled “Chemical Preconcentrator with Integral Thermal Flow Sensor”, and in U.S. Pat. No. 6,171,378 to Manginell et al., entitled “Chemical Preconcentrator”. For example, a chemical preconcentrator may be formed from a substrate having a suspended membrane, such as low-stress silicon nitride. This work incorporates a flow over design.
Multiple stage designs are often used for high volume concentration. Examples of multiple stage designs are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,854,431 to Linker et al., entitled “Two Stage Preconcentrator for Vapor/Particle Detection”, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,085,601 to Linker et al., entitled “Particle Preconcentrator”.
Example microscale preconcentrators with a flow through design are disclosed in U.S. Published Patent Application No. 20050095722 (incorporated by reference herein), published May 5, 2005, and entitled “Micro scale Flow Through Sorbent Plate Collection Device”, and in U.S. Published Patent Application No. 20050226778, published Oct. 13, 2005, and entitled “Micro scale Flow Through Sorbent Plate Collection Device”. The flow through design has a number of advantages, one of which is increasing contact between analyte fluid flow and a sorbent in a collection area compared to typical flow over designs that would require creating a turbulent flow to match the level of analyte fluid-sorbent contact.
However, while one or more of the preconcentrators described above are suitable for low volume collection, high volume collection for continuous testing presents special challenges. One reason is that preconcentrators and analysis instruments have generally been designed to conduct sampling over small time periods. Accordingly, the volume of sample flow that can be accommodated is generally small.
According to embodiments of the present invention, a large volume preconcentrator device for concentrating analytes is provided. An example device comprises a housing that accepts an analyte vapor flow, and a plurality of collection surfaces are disposed within the housing. A selectively actuatable heater is disposed on each of the collection surfaces.
At least one selectively actuatable damper is disposed within the housing for selectively restricting a collection flow.
Embodiments of the present invention provide, among other things, a preconcentrator suitable for collecting and desorbing a large volume of analyte. An example large volume preconcentrator is especially well-suited for vapor and particulate sampling within an HVAC system, though preconcentrators according to embodiments of the present invention may be used with other systems and/or analysis instruments. Such large volume preconcentrators may be used in concert with other preconcentrators to provide a multiple stage preconcentrator.
Generally, a large volume preconcentrator according to example embodiments of the invention includes a housing that accepts an analyte vapor flow, and houses one or more collection surfaces. Preferably, the collection surfaces are provided by surfaces of angled supports, for example louvers, disposed within the housing. Heaters may be provided on, for example affixed to, the collection surfaces. In a preferred embodiment, the heaters are affixed to both opposing surfaces (faces); that is, the collection surface and an opposed surface of each louver. Preferably, the heaters are thin and thermally isolated from the supporting louvers. In an example large volume preconcentrator, the heaters are adhered to both sides of the louvers. Alternatively, the heaters may be suspended in air to provide thermal insulation. The heaters on the collection face (the surface of the louver facing the collection flow of the analyte) are preferably (but not necessarily) coated with a sorbent material that collects target analytes while at a predetermined temperature, for example (but not necessarily) room temperature or ambient temperature, and desorbs upon heating to elevated temperatures (e.g., temperatures above the temperature used for collection). By thermally isolating the heaters from the supporting louvers, the amount of material to heat can be minimized, thus ensuring rapid heating and a concentrated analyte pulse.
In example embodiments, the narrow louvers may be fixed with respect to the housing (or at least can be fixed during collection and desorption), and the collection faces generally form a collection plane for collecting analyte. Immediately upstream of the collection plane, one or more selectively movable dampers are provided within the housing to selectively block fluid flow further upstream. In an example embodiment, adjustable louvers disposed within the housing are used alone or in combination as a valve to stop collection during desorption of the collected analyte. Once the heaters on the collection surfaces are heated, the pressure drop over the louver valve can then be used to drive analyte from the large volume preconcentrator to an outside system or device. Nonlimiting examples of outside systems or devices include a detector, an HVAC system, or an additional (e.g., second) preconcentator stage.
Preferred embodiments will now be discussed with respect to the drawings. The drawings include schematic figures that are not to scale, which will be fully understood by skilled artisans with reference to the accompanying description. Features may be exaggerated for purposes of illustration. From the preferred embodiments, artisans will recognize additional features and broader aspects of the invention.
To collect and desorb analyte, at least one and preferably a plurality of collection surfaces 20 are provided within the housing 12. In the example preconcentrator 10 shown in
The louvers 22 may be supported within the housing 12 in any suitable manner, and may be supported either independently or as one or more combined surfaces (e.g., in a frame). As shown in
The louvers 22 are preferably (but not necessarily) fixed in position with respect to the housing 12 (and thus are referred to as fixed louvers in some example embodiments), and may be angled so that the collection surfaces 20 face toward the collection flow 16 to collect the analyte, as shown in
For desorbing the analyte, as best shown in
In the example embodiment shown in
For collecting analyte, the collection surfaces 20 preferably include a layer 32 of a sorbent material, as best shown in
A significant design consideration for vapor or particle preconcentrators based on thermal desorption is the rate at which the collection surface 20 can be heated. Preferred embodiment devices are designed to provide a thermal power density sufficient to heat only the top surfaces of the heater up to 230° C. or some appropriate thermal desorption temperature. A preferred embodiment strip heater 28 is shown in
Not shown in
The individual heater strips 28 may be linked together in parallel over relatively large areas in order to simplify electrical connections and control electronics, or connected separately should they need, for example, to be individually addressed to allow for programmed sequential desorption. Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate electrical connections and control electronics that may be used. In the nonlimiting example heater 28 shown in
Referring again to
Thus, in an example operation, during collection mode as shown in
After a suitable time period for collection (which can vary, as will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art), the preconcentrator 10 then enters desorption mode (
As a nonlimiting example of an outside device, the preconcentrator 10 in
In an example embodiment, a selectively operable valve 52 may be provided in an outside device or between the housing 10 and the outside device to control fluid flow. For example, during collection mode (
Large volume preconcentrators according to embodiments of the present invention, such as the preconcentrator 10, provide various features and advantages. For example, the example heater 28 and variations thereof offer more flexibility in terms of controlling the temperature profile over the collection surfaces in comparison to those based on metal or carbon meshes. Also, by utilizing dampers such as the louvers 44 as valves, the device 10 is more easily extended to arbitrarily large cross sectional areas as opposed to other macro-scale preconcentrators that utilize expensive (and large) iris or gate valves. If the collection surfaces 20, and the heaters 28, are quite thin, the pressure drop will be lower than in designs that use metal or carbon mesh. The preferred embodiment housing 10 and variations thereof can be easily retrofitted over any of various outside devices. A nonlimiting example is a return air duct inlet.
It will be appreciated that the preconcentrator 10 shown in
In another example embodiment, the louvers 44 or other supports may include one or more narrow slots running therethrough, defining generally rectangular spaces between the narrow slots. These narrow slots can allow tuning of the size of the particles that are captured on the collection surface based on the linear velocity, while allowing fibers and other contaminants to pass through.
Among many other possible variations, the preconcentrator 10 may be used in conjunction with an ionic or ozone based particle precipitation technology to enhance particle collection efficiency and/or analyte desorption from the source. The preconcentrator 10 may alternatively or additionally be used in conjunction with a laser desorption technique for release of analyte from targets.
While various embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, it should be understood that other modifications, substitutions, and alternatives are apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art. Such modifications, substitutions, and alternatives can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, which should be determined from the appended claims.
Various features of the invention are set forth in the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/137,554, filed Jul. 31, 2008, under 35 U.S.C. Section 119, and also claims benefit as a National Stage Entry of PCT/US2009/52483, which has an international filing date of Jul. 31, 2009.
This application was made with Government assistance under Grant No. 2004-IJ-CX-K0555 issued by Department of Justice. The Government has certain rights in this invention.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2009/052483 | 7/31/2009 | WO | 00 | 5/23/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/014950 | 2/4/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3768300 | Nemeth | Oct 1973 | A |
4011301 | Young | Mar 1977 | A |
4698071 | Elias | Oct 1987 | A |
4805441 | Sides et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4839143 | Vora et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4935040 | Goedert | Jun 1990 | A |
4964309 | Jenkins | Oct 1990 | A |
5014541 | Sides et al. | May 1991 | A |
5035776 | Knapp et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5053343 | Vora et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5083019 | Spangler | Jan 1992 | A |
5092155 | Rounbehler et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5092218 | Fine et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5142143 | Fite et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5174797 | Yow et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5395589 | Nacson | Mar 1995 | A |
5465607 | Corrigan et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5578271 | Simon et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5690763 | Ashmead et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5707502 | McCaffrey et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5720798 | Nickerson et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5753832 | Bromberg et al. | May 1998 | A |
5792423 | Markelov | Aug 1998 | A |
5817012 | Schoendorfer | Oct 1998 | A |
5847291 | Green et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5854431 | Linker | Dec 1998 | A |
5932482 | Markelov | Aug 1999 | A |
5970803 | Staples et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6001308 | Marlow et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6022748 | Charych et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6057162 | Rounbehler et al. | May 2000 | A |
6066295 | Bernstein et al. | May 2000 | A |
6085601 | Linker | Jul 2000 | A |
6087183 | Zaromb | Jul 2000 | A |
6171378 | Manginell et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6239428 | Kunz | May 2001 | B1 |
6242195 | Idusogie et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6257835 | Kaehler | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6295860 | Sakairi et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6316268 | Yang | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6326615 | Syage et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6345545 | Linker et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6354160 | Staples et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6442997 | Mergerle et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6485987 | Charych et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6527835 | Manginell et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6619143 | Danylewych-May et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6666907 | Manginell et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6706091 | Robinson et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6759013 | Kaltenbach et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6811587 | Lorey | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6869501 | Davidson et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6893879 | Peterson et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6914220 | Tian et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
RE38797 | Linker | Sep 2005 | E |
6989891 | Braig et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7104112 | Bonne | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7118712 | Manginell et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7141786 | McGann et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7244288 | Belyakov | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7273517 | Lewis et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7306649 | Boyle et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
20020055184 | Naylor et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20030106799 | Covington et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040035226 | Allen et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040035227 | Allen et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040060346 | Bonne et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050014134 | West | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050095722 | McGill et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050226778 | Houser et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050253061 | Cameron et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060257287 | Call | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070084347 | Boyle et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070176092 | Miller et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080148815 | Lucas et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090028208 | Martin | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090090197 | Finlay | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090249958 | Cambron et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100236341 | Martin et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19851821 | May 2000 | DE |
0649337 | Sep 1996 | EP |
0502998 | Jul 1999 | EP |
2243917 | Nov 1991 | GB |
9735174 | Sep 1997 | WO |
0140793 | Jun 2001 | WO |
2004052540 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004083806 | Sep 2004 | WO |
2005029030 | Mar 2005 | WO |
2006003646 | Jan 2006 | WO |
2006003646 | Jan 2006 | WO |
2006013396 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2006046077 | May 2006 | WO |
2006046988 | May 2006 | WO |
2006073434 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2006073440 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2006104603 | Oct 2006 | WO |
2007041551 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2007044473 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2007056488 | May 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Patent Office; European Search Report; Aug. 28, 2013; pp. 1-7; European Patent Office; the Netherlands. |
Berger, T., et al.; “Development of Electrochemical Sensors for Trace Detection of Explosives and for the Detection of Chemical Warfare Agents”; Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering; vol. 4038; pp. 452-461; 2000. |
Cabalo, J., et al.; “Trace Detection of Explosives with Low Vapor Emissions by Laser Surface Photofragmentation-Fragment Detection Spectroscopy with an Improved Ionization Probe”; Applied Optics; vol. 44; No. 6; pp. 1084-1091; 20; Feb. 2005. |
Da Silva, J.A.F., et al.; Simulations of silicon microstructure for preconcentration of metallic ions; Microelectronics Technology and Devices; SBMICRO 2003; Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Symposium; Sep. 2003; pp. 420-427; Pennington, NJ; USA. |
Davidson, William R., et al.; “Vapor and Particle Sampling in the Detection of Terrorists Explosives”; Proc. 50th ASMS Conf. Mass Spectrom; Allied Top; pp. 697-698; 2002. |
Ewing, R.G., et al.; “Detection of Volatile Vapours Emitted from Explosives with a Handheld Ion-Mobility Spectrometer”; Field Analytical Chemistry and Technology; vol. 5; No. 5; pp. 215-221; 2001. |
Fisher, M, et al.; “Explosive Detection Using High-Volume Vapor Sampling and Analysis by Trained Canines and Ultra-Trace Detection Equipment”; Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering; vol. 5403; No. 1; pp. 409-417; Apr. 12-16, 2004. |
Goeringer, Douglas et al.; Comparison of Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Ionization and Atmospheric Sampling Glow Discharge Ionization Combined with Tandem Mass Spectrometry for Explosives Vapor Detection; Proc. 50th ASMS Conf. Mass Spectrom; Allied Top; pp. 707-708; 2002. |
Hannum, David W., et al.; “Miniaturized Explosive Preconcentrator for Use in a Man-Portable Field Detection System”; International Nuclear Materials Management Conference; Phoenix, AZ; Aug. 2, 1999. |
Ho, C.K., et al.; “Integrated Chemiresistor Sensors with Preconcentrators for Monitoring Volatile Organic Compounds in Water”; Proceedings of the 2005 World Water and Environmental Resources Congress; EWRI 2005: Impacts of Global Climate Change; Anchorage, Alaska; May 15, 2005. |
Holland, R.M. et al.; “Handheld GC Instrumentation for Chemical Weapons Convention treaty verification inspections Monograph Title—Field screening methods for hazardous wastes and toxic chemicals, VIP-47”; vol. 1; Air and Waste Management Association; Pittsburgh, PA; 1995. |
Hughes, David; “Explosive Detection Equipment Firms Develop Enhanced X-Ray and Vapor Technologies”; Aviation Week & Space Technology; vol. 134; No. 12; pp. 60-62; Mar. 25, 1991. |
Hughes, R.C. et al.; “Chemical sensing with an integrated preconcentrator/chemiresistor array”; Chemical and Biological Sensors and Analytical Methods II Proceedings of the International Symposium; 2001; pp. 348-354; Electrochemical Society; Pennington, NJ; USA. |
Hughes, R.C. et al.; “A MEMS Based Hybrid Preconcentrator/Chemiresistor Chemical Sensor”; Sep. 1, 2002. |
Lucero, Daniel P.; “User Requirements and Performance Specifications for Explosive Vapor Detection Systems”; Journal of Testing & Evaluation; vol. 13; No. 3; pp. 222-233; 1985. |
Martin, Michael, et al.; “Characterization of a Cascaded Micro-Preconcentrator Sampler for IMS”; International Symposium in Thun. Switzerland on Jul. 25-31, 2009. |
Martin, Michael, et al.; “Microfabricated vapor preconcentrator for portable ion mobility spectroscopy”; Sensors and Actuators, B: Chemical; vol. 126; No. 2; Oct. 1, 2007. |
McGill, R.A., et al.; “A micromachined preconcentrator for enhanced trace detection of illicit materials”; 2003 International Semiconductor Device Research Symposium; IEEE; Piscataway, NJ; USA. |
McGill, R.A., et al.; “Choosing polymer coatings for chemical sensors”; American Chemical Society; Chemtech; Sep. 1994. |
Owano, T.G., et al.; “Ultrasensitive Detection of Explosives Vapor Using Mid-IR Cavity Ring-Down Spectroscopy”; Technical Digest. Summaries of papers presented at the Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics; Postconference Technical Digest; pp. 519-520; 2001. |
Parmeter, J.E., et al.; “Development of a portable preconcentrator/ion mobility spectrometer system for the trace detection of narcotics”; Sandia National Labs; Report; Albuquerque, NM; Aug. 1997. |
Parmeter, J.E., et al.; “Explosives detection portal for high-volume personnel screening”; Proceedings of the 1998 Enforcement and Security Technologies; Boston, MA 1999. |
Parmeter, John, et al.; “Overview of Explosives Detection Research and Development in Department 5848 at Sandia National Laboratories”; 16th Annual NDIA Security Technology Symposium & Exhibition; Jun. 26-29, 2000. |
Ritchie, Robert K., et al.; “Detection of Explosives, Narcotics, and Taggant Vapors by an Ion Mobility Spectrometry Particle Detector”; Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering; vol. 2092; pp. 87-93; 1994. |
Rodacy, Philip, J., et al.; “Unexploded ordnance classification sensor for underwater applications”; Sandia National Labs; Report; Albuquerque, NM Apr. 1, 2000. |
Rhykerd, C., et al.; “Airport testing an explosives detection portal”; Institute of Nuclear Materials Management (INMM) annual meeting; Naples, FL; Jul. 26-30, 1998. |
Sandia National Laboratories; “Micro Analytical Systems Department Technology—μChemLab, Fact Sheet”; Dec. 30, 2002. |
Seman, G., et al.; “Detection of Hidden Explosives on Passenger Aircraft using Hand Searches, Bio-Sensors and Vapour Detectors”; Proceedings of the 1977 International Conference on Crime Countermeasures—Science and Engineering; pp. 65-84; 1977. |
Sigman, M.E., et al.; “Performance Evaluation of an In-Injection Port Thermal Desorption/Gas-Chromatographic/Negative Ion Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometric Method for Trace Explosive Vapour Analysis”; Analytical Chemistry; vol. 73; No. 4; pp. 792-798; Feb. 15, 2001. |
Simoes, E.W., et al.; “Study of preconcentration of non-polar compounds in microchannels with constrictions”; Sensors and Actuators; vol. 115; No. 1; Lausanne, Switzerland; May 23, 2006; pp. 232-239. |
Spicer, James B, et al.; “Overview: MURI Center on Spectroscopic and Time Domain Detection of Trace Explosives in Condensed and Vapor Phases”; Proc. SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng.; vol. 5089; No. 2; pp. 1088-1094; 2003. |
Staples, Edward J., et al.; “Ultrahigh-Speed Chromatography and Virtual Chemical Sensors for Detecting Explosive and Chemical Warfare Agents”; IEEE Sensors J.; vol. 5; No. 4; pp. 622-631; Aug. 2005. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110214482 A1 | Sep 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61137554 | Jul 2008 | US |