This application is the U.S. National Phase under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of International Application No. PCT/GB2012/000876, filed Nov. 29, 2012, which claims priority to Great Britain Patent Application No. 1120628.1, filed Nov. 30, 2011.
The present invention relates to an endoscopy device, and more particularly to an endoscopy device that also provides an airway.
Certain surgical and diagnostic endoscopy procedures require the insertion of instruments or viewing devices into the upper gastrointestinal tract of a patient. For example, in endoscopy an endoscope is passed directly through the mouth of the patient, into the oesophagus and down to the stomach and duodenum. The endoscope includes at its tip a light and a visualisation device such as a camera and can include a working channel down which the operator can pass other instruments. In an endoscopy the patient is usually given some form of local anesthetic, and in some cases also a sedative. A mouth guard is placed between the patient's teeth and the endoscope is passed through it, at which point the patient is required to swallow the leading or distal end of the endoscope. Once the patient has swallowed the distal end, the operator must then push the endoscope by manual force down through the oesophagus into the stomach and duodenum.
A number of problems can be experienced with procedures such as endoscopy that require insertion of instruments or viewing devices blind and under manual force into a patient's oesophagus. Firstly, the use of local anaesthetics and sedatives is undesirable in some patients and may cause cardio respiratory complications, including small variations in a patient's vital signs to arrhythmias, respiratory arrest, myocardial infarction, shock and possibly even death (page 7, Complications of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Riley and Alderson, BSG Guidelines in Gastroenterology, November 2006). In addition, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy may cause problems such as infection, perforation or in some cases, bleeding. Specifically, perforation may take place in the pharynx or oesophagus of a patient, often at sites of pathology or as a result of blind insertion of an endoscope (pages 7 and 8, Complications of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Riley and Alderson, BSG Guidelines in Gastroenterology, November 2006). Furthermore, it is known that therapeutic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy often takes a longer amount of time than diagnostic endoscopy. In addition, in many cases the use of such a technique may be more uncomfortable for the patient concerned and may require a greater level of intravenous sedation, which combined with intravenous analgesia, may cause cardio respiratory complications (page 8, Complications of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Riley and Alderson, BSG Guidelines in Gastroenterology, November 2006).
In addition, following upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, patients may experience some minor discomfort to the throat and abdomen. Although these complaints are generally considered to be minor, one prospective study has found that approximately 2% of patients went on to seek medical advice, with some patients being hospitalised (page 7, Complications of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Riley and Alderson, BSG Guidelines in Gastroenterology, November 2006).
At present, an endoscope is usually inserted into the oesophagus of a patient on its own, i.e. in the absence of a guide device. This typically causes problems during general anaesthesia as it may interfere with and obstruct the breathing of the patient, due to the fact that little or no air supply is provided. Therefore, in such situations, it is important to carry out the investigative procedure quickly, minimising the amount of time in which the endoscope is inserted. This may result in less information being obtained during the investigative procedure, may be dangerous to the patient and may result in increased costs being incurred.
It is known to use a guide tube to provide a path for travel of an endoscope into a body cavity. EP 2368481 and EP 2368483 relate to a guide device for guiding the entry of an endoscope into a body cavity of a patient.
Artificial airway devices such as the laryngeal mask airway device are well known devices useful for establishing airways in unconscious patients. In its most basic form a laryngeal mask airway device consists of an airway tube and a mask carried at one end of the airway tube, the mask having a peripheral formation often known as a “cuff” which is capable of conforming to and of fitting within, the actual and potential space behind the larynx of the patient so as to form a seal around the laryngeal inlet. The cuff can be inflatable, and in most variants it surrounds a hollow interior space or lumen of the mask, the at least one airway tube opening into the lumen. U.S. Pat. No. 4,509,514 is one of the many publications that describe laryngeal mask airway devices such as this. It is relatively easy to insert a laryngeal mask airway device into a patient and thereby establish an airway. Also, the laryngeal mask airway device is a “forgiving” device in that even if it is inserted improperly, it still tends to establish an airway. Accordingly, the laryngeal mask airway device is often thought of as a “life saving” device. Also, the laryngeal mask airway device may be inserted with only relatively minor manipulation of the patient's head, neck and jaw. Further, the laryngeal mask airway device provides ventilation of the patient's lungs without requiring contact with the sensitive inner lining of the trachea and the size of the airway established is typically significantly larger than the size of the airway established with an endotracheal tube. Also, the laryngeal mask airway device does not interfere with coughing to the same extent as endotracheal tubes. Largely due to these advantages, the laryngeal mask airway device has enjoyed increasing popularity in recent years.
During endoscopy, it is preferable for an endoscope to be thin and flexible, in order to assist in examination of the upper gastrointestinal tract of a patient. Such a device would generally not be suitable for use with a laryngeal mask which would typically restrict the movement of the endoscope within the patient. In addition, the provision of a laryngeal mask in combination with an endoscope may present difficulties to a user as the endoscope may interfere with insertion of the laryngeal mask within the oesophagus of a patient, such that the insertion of the laryngeal mask in combination with an endoscope would typically be more difficult when compared with insertion of the mask alone.
It is an object of the present invention to seek to mitigate problems such as these.
According to a first aspect of the invention there is provided an endoscopy device for facilitating the use of a endoscope, comprising at least one airway tube and a mask carried at one end of the at least one airway tube, the mask having a distal end and a proximal end and a peripheral formation capable of conforming to, and of fitting within, the actual and potential space behind the larynx of the patient so as to form a seal around the circumference of the laryngeal inlet, the peripheral formation surrounding a hollow interior space or lumen of the mask and the at least one airway tube opening into the lumen of the mask, the device further comprising a conduit adapted for passage of an endoscope into the oesophagus of a patient when the mask is in place.
The provision of an endoscopy device in accordance with the present invention has the combined benefits of establishing an airway within a patient and protecting the airway from regurgitation or vomiting that might be caused by endoscopy. Thus, the device of the present invention advantageously assists in the safe and accurate insertion of an endoscope within the oesophagus of a patient, whilst at the same time establishing an airway within the patient.
Preferably, the device of the present invention comprises a proximal end and a distal end, wherein a major axis (20 of
Typically, the device of the present invention minimises the frictional contact between the inside walls of the conduit and an endoscope inserted therein. Advantageously, the device of the present invention assists in the insertion of an endoscope within the conduit and thus the oesophagus of a patient.
Preferably, the conduit has a large bore diameter. Typically, the conduit has a diameter of between about 5 and 25 mm, more typically between about 10 and 20 mm and most typically about 15 mm, depending on the size of the endoscopy device. Advantageously, the diameter of the conduit allows the passage of an endoscope through the conduit. Thus, the conduit forms an “operating channel” through which a surgeon can view the upper gastrointestinal tract of a patient. In addition, the diameter of the conduit may be varied depending on the anatomy of a patient. Preferably, the radial wall thickness of the conduit is between about 1 to 2 mm.
Preferably, the conduit comprises a plurality of bores. Typically, the conduit comprises a plurality of channels, advantageously providing a structure having an increased rigidity. In addition, the conduit is preferably substantially flexible to assist in the insertion of the device within the anatomy of the patient.
In a preferred embodiment, the conduit comprises a silicone material. In another embodiment, the conduit may comprise a plastics material, such as polyvinylchloride (PVC), or rubber. Preferably, the conduit has a durometer hardness of between 60 and 70 Shore. This durometer hardness has the advantage that, upon insertion, less force is required to insert the conduit within the oesophagus of the patient.
Typically, the endoscopy device in accordance with the present invention is inserted into the upper oesophageal sphincter of a patient. Due to the narrow dimensions of this region of the anatomy, careful insertion of the device is required. Typically, the endoscopy device in accordance with the present invention is inserted into the upper oesophageal sphincter by means of the tip of the cuff, which provides guided insertion of the device. Furthermore, the distal flexibility of the tip of the device may assist in tracking the posterior curvature of the throat of a patient upon insertion of the device and reduces trauma to the throat of the patient.
The use of an endoscopy device in accordance with the present invention in combination with an endoscope is safer than use of the endoscope alone and advantageously allows the endoscope to be inserted within the oesophagus of a patient for a longer period of time.
Typically; the peripheral formation may be inflatable. Preferably, the peripheral formation is an inflatable cuff. The cuff is typically capable of conforming to and fitting within the actual and potential space behind the larynx of the patient so as to form a seal around the laryngeal inlet. Typically, the cuff extends from a proximal end to a distal end. It is preferred that the mask describes a substantially convex curve, from a proximal to distal end. It is further preferred that the mask comprises a backplate, the backplate having a dorsal side and a ventral side, the dorsal side being substantially smooth and having a convex curvature across its width. It is also preferred that the dorsal surface of the airway tube corresponds in curvature to the curvature across the width of the backplate. All of these expedients assist in making insertion of the mask easier.
The airway tube preferably comprises a material that is relatively more rigid than the material of the mask body. Typically, the airway tube has a smaller diameter than the diameter of the conduit, thus providing more space for the conduit upon insertion of the device within a patient. Preferably, the airway tube is reinforced such that the formation of kinks within the tube is avoided. Both the airway tube and the mask body preferably comprise a plastics material. In one embodiment, the airway tube may comprise a silicone material.
In some embodiments, the airway tube may comprise a connector element at the proximal end thereof. The connector element may be provided to connect the airway tube to a gas supply. In a preferred embodiment, the airway tube does not comprise a connector element at the proximal end thereof. Advantageously, the absence of a connector element at the proximal end of the airway tube assists in the insertion of the airway tube within the oesophagus of a patient.
In a preferred embodiment, the conduit has a length such that, in use, it extends from the distal end of the mask, passes through the mouth of a patient and emerges between the teeth of the patient. Advantageously, the conduit and thus the endoscope may be inserted through the mouth of a patient.
In one embodiment, the airway tube includes a relatively softer wall portion adjacent a point that, in use, will be adjacent the patient's teeth. It is preferred that the relatively softer portion forms a part of a bite block. The provision of a bite block at a relatively softer portion of the airway tube has the advantage that it guards against damage to the teeth of a patient by virtue of the less rigid parts. In another embodiment, a bite block may be provided on the conduit. The provision of a bite block on the airway tube or conduit has the additional advantage that it prevents collapse of the channel provided by either component. For the avoidance of doubt, the endoscopy device may or may not have means for removal of oesophageal material.
Preferably, the distal end of the conduit is substantially adjacent to the distal end of the cuff. More preferably, the distal end of the conduit is provided at an angle α to the horizontal plane (wherein the horizontal plane is perpendicular to the major axis of the device when the device is in a substantially linear conformation). Typically, the angle α is about 10 to 15 degrees to the horizontal plane, and more preferably about 45 degrees to the horizontal plane. Preferably, the angle α is an acute angle. The provision of a conduit having a distal end which is provided at an angle α with respect to the horizontal plane assists in the insertion of the device within a patient. Advantageously, the greater the size of the angle α with respect to the horizontal plane, the easier the insertion of the device within a patient. Preferably, the distal end of the conduit does not extend significantly beyond the distal end the cuff, such that it does not interfere with the guiding means provided by the tip of the cuff (at the distal end of the cuff) during insertion of the device.
Typically, the conduit may be positioned such that it projects in a left or right direction with respect to the major axis of the device, when viewed from the front of the device. Advantageously, the direction in which the conduit projects relative to the major axis of the device may be selected depending on whether the person operating the endoscopy device is left or right handed.
In a preferred embodiment, an aperture may be provided within the cuff. More preferably, an aperture may be provided at the distal end of the cuff. Advantageously, the provision of an aperture within the cuff facilitates the attachment of the conduit to the cuff. In addition, the provision of an aperture within the cuff may assist in the use of an endoscope to view the upper gastrointestinal tract of a patient, when such an instrument is inserted within the conduit.
Typically, the conduit adopts a straight or linear configuration. In another embodiment, the conduit may be moulded such that it is curved and follows the anatomical shape of a patient's airway.
In a preferred embodiment, the endoscopy device comprises a conduit and an airway tube that are maintained in a configuration such that they are separate from one another. This is advantageous, as it allows an airway to be established upon insertion of the device and ensures that the airway is protected from regurgitation and/or vomiting that may occur as a result of insertion of the endoscope. In another embodiment, the airway tube and conduit may be connected to one another. In this embodiment, it would also be necessary for the components to separate from one another at a region of the device, in order to establish an airway on insertion of the device and protect the airway from regurgitation and/or vomiting that may occur as a result of insertion of the endoscope.
The invention will further be described by way of example and with reference to the following drawings, in which,
Referring now to the drawings, there is illustrated a device 1 for facilitating the use of a gastroscope, comprising at least one airway tube 2 and a mask 3 carried at one end of the at least one airway tube, the mask 3 having a distal end 4 and a proximal end 5 and a peripheral formation 6 capable of conforming to, and of fitting within, the actual and potential space behind the larynx of the patient so as to form a seal around the circumference of the laryngeal inlet, the peripheral formation 6 surrounding a hollow interior space or lumen 7 of the mask 3 and the at least one airway tube 2 opening into the lumen 7 of the mask, the device further comprising a conduit 8 adapted for passage of a gastroscope into the oesophagus of a patient when the mask 3 is in place.
In terms of the overall appearance, the device 1 in accordance with the present invention is somewhat similar to prior art laryngeal mask airway devices, in that it consists of the basic parts which make up most, if not all, such devices, i.e. an airway tube 2 and a mask portion 3. With reference to the Figures, the device 1 has a proximal end 1a (the end nearest the user when the device is in use), a distal end 1b (the end farthest from the user when the device is in use), a dorsal or pharyngeal side, a ventral or laryngeal side, and right and left sides.
The airway tube 2, extends from a proximal end 2a to a distal end 2b, and the distal end 2b opens into the interior of the hollow mask portion 3. The airway tube 2 may be resiliently deformable or relatively rigid, to enable it to assist in insertion of the device 1 into a patient, acting as a handle and a guide. The airway tube 2 may be made of any material that is currently used for such purposes as will be apparent to one of skill in the art, for example, silicone rubber or plastics materials. It may be straight and flexible or moulded into an appropriately anatomically-curved shape.
Referring firstly to the embodiment of
The cuff 6 may comprise blow moulded PVC and may take the form of a generally elliptical inflatable ring. The cuff 6 is typically integrally formed in one piece.
It is preferred that the mask describes a substantially convex curve, from the proximal to distal end. It is further preferred that the backplate 9 comprises a dorsal side and a ventral side, the dorsal side being substantially smooth and having a convex curvature across its width. It is also preferred that the dorsal surface of the airway tube 2 corresponds in curvature to the curvature across the width of the backplate 9. The backplate 9 is typically formed by moulding from a Shore 50A Vythene PVC+PU. This material is typically substantially softer and more deformable than the material of airway tube 2. The backplate 9 typically comprises a generally oval moulding when viewed from the dorsal or ventral directions.
In contrast to prior art laryngeal mask airway devices, the device 1 according to the invention includes a conduit 8, which conduit 8 is provided to facilitate insertion of a gastroscope, such as a fibrescope or an endoscope, into the oesophagus of a patient when the mask 3 is in place. In this embodiment the device 1 of the present invention comprises a proximal end 1a and a distal end 1b, wherein a major axis is provided therebetween, and wherein the conduit 8 may be provided at an angle such that it is offset to the midline with respect to the major axis of the device. This is of benefit as in some cases there may not be enough space to comfortably accommodate the conduit 8 and the airway tube 2 if they were both provided within the same plane. Thus, the provision of the conduit 8 at an angle offset to the midline with respect to the major axis of the device has the advantage that it allows both the conduit 8 and the airway tube 2 to be more comfortably accommodated within the oesophagus of a patient. In addition, in this embodiment, the conduit 8 does not obstruct the airway tube and thus the airway established by the device.
The conduit 8 preferably has a relatively large bore diameter. Typically, the conduit has a diameter of between 5 and 25 mm, more typically between 10 and 20 mm and most typically about 15 mm. Such a diameter may be provided to allow the passage of a gastroscope such as an endoscope or fibrescope through the conduit 8. However, the diameter of the conduit 8 may be varied depending on the anatomy of a patient. Preferably, the conduit 8 comprises a plurality of bores 11 (as shown in
The conduit 8 preferably extends through the mask portion 3 of the device and contacts the distal end 6b of the cuff 6. Preferably, the distal end 8b of the conduit 8 is provided adjacent to the distal end 6b of the cuff 6. Preferably, the distal end 8b of the conduit 8 is provided at an angle α (5c) to the horizontal plane 5b (wherein the horizontal plane is substantially perpendicular to the major axis 5a of the device 1 when the device is in a substantially linear conformation). Preferably, the angle α is about 10 to 15 degrees to the horizontal plane, and more preferably at about 45 degrees to the horizontal plane. The provision of the conduit 8 having a distal end 8b which is provided at an angle α to the horizontal plane assists in the insertion of the device 1 within the oesophagus of a patient. Preferably, the distal end 8b of the conduit 8 does not extend significantly beyond the distal end of the cuff 6 (i.e. at the tip of the cuff), such that it does not interfere with the guiding means provided by the tip of the cuff 6 during insertion of the device 1. This can be seen in
Throughout most of its length, the conduit 8 may conveniently be moulded or extruded from a flexible or elastomeric material such as silicone or other plastic or rubber, preferably of a durometer hardness in the range 60 to 70 Shore. For use in adult humans, the inner diameter (i.d.) of the conduit 8 may be about 15 mm, and the radial wall thickness may be about 1 to 2 mm.
As shown in
In use, the device 1 is inserted through a patient's mouth and down through the throat past the epiglottis until the mask 3 comes to rest with the distal end of the cuff 6b in the base of the throat, lying against the upper end of the normally closed oesophagus (which the mask 3 cannot easily enter because of its dimensions). The cuff 6 is then inflated to seal around the inlet to the larynx.
After insertion of the device, a gastroscope such as a fibrescope or an endoscope may be inserted through the conduit 8. The provision of the conduit 8 at an angle, such that it is offset to the midline with respect to the major axis of the device 1, has the advantage that it does not obstruct the airway tube 2 and provides more space for the conduit 8 and the airway tube 2 within the oesophagus of the patient. Thus, an airway is established within a patient by means of the airway tube 2 and a gastroscope may simultaneously be inserted through the conduit 8.
Referring now to
Referring to now to
In this embodiment it can be seen that the airway tube 2 and the conduit 8 are both received in a part 18 which in this embodiment part 18 takes the form of a biteblock 18. Biteblock 18 is an integrally molded plastics part and is formed with two bores, one each to accommodate the airway tube 2 and the conduit 8. As an alternative, it will be appreciated that the bite block 18 can be formed integrally with one or both of the airway tube 2 and conduit 8. The bite block 18 has upper and lower (in use) bite surfaces 18a, 18b which may be formed integrally with relatively softer material or soft material inserts in order to prevent damage to the teeth of a patient when the device 1 is in use. The bite block 18 has proximal and distal ends 19a, 19b and is provided at its distal end 19b with tapered section 19c to aid in inserting the device 1. As can be seen from
Referring now to
As will be appreciated, the major difference between this device and those previously described is the configuration of the distal end of the conduit 8. In this embodiment the distal end of the conduit 8 tapers and is provided with means 26 to allow expansion of the outlet 27. In this embodiment the means 26 takes the form of four slits in the wall of the conduit 8 that extend from the outlet back a distance that is sufficient to allow the outlet to expand substantially in the range of from 5 mm to at least 15 mm. Thus, in a first position illustrated in
Thus, it has been demonstrated that the present invention provides a device that enables the safe and accurate insertion of an endoscope 28 into the oesophagus of a patient, whilst at the same time establishing an airway and protecting the airway from vomiting or regurgitation that may occur upon insertion of an endoscope.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1120628.1 | Nov 2011 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2012/000876 | 11/29/2012 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/079902 | 6/6/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2096831 | Wappler | Oct 1937 | A |
2099127 | Leech | Nov 1937 | A |
2252874 | Vischer, Jr. | Aug 1941 | A |
2839788 | Dembiak | Jun 1958 | A |
2862498 | Weekes | Dec 1958 | A |
3124959 | Pall et al. | Mar 1964 | A |
3529596 | Garner | Sep 1970 | A |
3554673 | Schwartz et al. | Jan 1971 | A |
3576187 | Oddera | Apr 1971 | A |
3683908 | Michael et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
3794036 | Carroll | Feb 1974 | A |
3931822 | Marici | Jan 1976 | A |
3948273 | Sanders | Apr 1976 | A |
4056104 | Jaffe | Nov 1977 | A |
4067329 | Winicki et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4096759 | Desor | Jun 1978 | A |
4104357 | Blair | Aug 1978 | A |
4116201 | Shah | Sep 1978 | A |
4134407 | Elam | Jan 1979 | A |
4159722 | Walker | Jul 1979 | A |
4166467 | Abramson | Sep 1979 | A |
4178938 | Au et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4178940 | Au et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4230108 | Young | Oct 1980 | A |
4231365 | Scarberry | Nov 1980 | A |
4256099 | Dryden | Mar 1981 | A |
4285340 | Gezari et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4338930 | Williams | Jul 1982 | A |
4351330 | Scarberry | Sep 1982 | A |
4363320 | Kossove | Dec 1982 | A |
4445366 | Gray | May 1984 | A |
4446864 | Watson et al. | May 1984 | A |
4471775 | Clair et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4501273 | McGinnis | Feb 1985 | A |
4509514 | Brain et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4510273 | Miura et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4526196 | Pistillo | Jul 1985 | A |
4553540 | Straith | Nov 1985 | A |
4583917 | Shah | Apr 1986 | A |
4630606 | Weerda et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4689041 | Corday et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4700700 | Eliachar | Oct 1987 | A |
4770170 | Sato et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4793327 | Frankel | Dec 1988 | A |
4798597 | Vaillancourt | Jan 1989 | A |
4825862 | Sato | May 1989 | A |
4832020 | Augustine | May 1989 | A |
4850349 | Farahany | Jul 1989 | A |
4856510 | Kowalewski et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4872483 | Shah | Oct 1989 | A |
4896667 | Magnusson et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4924862 | Levinson | May 1990 | A |
4953547 | Poole, Jr. | Sep 1990 | A |
4972963 | Guarriello et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4981470 | Bombeck, IV | Jan 1991 | A |
4995388 | Brain et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5038766 | Parker | Aug 1991 | A |
5042469 | Augustine | Aug 1991 | A |
5042476 | Smith | Aug 1991 | A |
5060647 | Alessi | Oct 1991 | A |
5067496 | Eisele | Nov 1991 | A |
5113875 | Bennett | May 1992 | A |
5174283 | Parker | Dec 1992 | A |
5203320 | Augustine | Apr 1993 | A |
5218970 | Turnbull et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5235973 | Levinson | Aug 1993 | A |
5237988 | McNeese | Aug 1993 | A |
5241325 | Nguyen et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5241956 | Brain | Sep 1993 | A |
5249571 | Brain et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5273537 | Haskvitz et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5277178 | DinQiey et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5282464 | Brain et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5297547 | Brain et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5303697 | Brain et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5305743 | Brain | Apr 1994 | A |
5311861 | Miller et al. | May 1994 | A |
5318017 | Ellison | Jun 1994 | A |
5331967 | Akerson et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5339805 | Parker | Aug 1994 | A |
5339808 | Don Michael | Aug 1994 | A |
5355879 | Brain et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5361753 | Pothmann et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5391248 | Brain et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5400771 | Pirak et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5421325 | Cinberg et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5438982 | Macintyre | Aug 1995 | A |
5443063 | Greenberg | Aug 1995 | A |
5452715 | Boussignac et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5459700 | Jacobs | Oct 1995 | A |
5487383 | Levinson | Jan 1996 | A |
5529582 | Fukuhara et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5546935 | Champeau | Aug 1996 | A |
5546936 | Virag et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5551420 | Lurie et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5554673 | Shah | Sep 1996 | A |
5569219 | Hakki et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5577693 | Corn | Nov 1996 | A |
5582167 | Joseph | Dec 1996 | A |
5584290 | Brain et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5590643 | Flam | Jan 1997 | A |
5599301 | Jacobs et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5623921 | Kinsinger et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5623924 | Lindenman et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5626151 | Linden | May 1997 | A |
5632271 | Brain | May 1997 | A |
RE35531 | Callaghan et al. | Jun 1997 | E |
5653229 | Greenberg | Aug 1997 | A |
5655528 | Pagan et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5682880 | Brain et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5692498 | Lurie et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5694929 | Christopher | Dec 1997 | A |
5711293 | Brain et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5738094 | Hottman | Apr 1998 | A |
5743254 | Parker | Apr 1998 | A |
5743258 | Sato et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5746202 | Pagan et al. | May 1998 | A |
5771889 | Pagan et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778872 | Fukunaga et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5791341 | Bullard | Aug 1998 | A |
5794617 | Brunell et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5816240 | Komesaroff | Oct 1998 | A |
5819723 | Joseph | Oct 1998 | A |
5832916 | Lundberg et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5850832 | Chu | Dec 1998 | A |
5855203 | Matter | Jan 1999 | A |
5856510 | Meng et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5860418 | Lundberg et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5862801 | Wells | Jan 1999 | A |
5865176 | O'Neil et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5878745 | Brain et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5881726 | Neame | Mar 1999 | A |
5893891 | Zahedi et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5896858 | Brain | Apr 1999 | A |
5915383 | Pagan | Jun 1999 | A |
5921239 | McCall et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5924862 | White | Jul 1999 | A |
5935084 | Southworth | Aug 1999 | A |
5937860 | Cook | Aug 1999 | A |
5957133 | Hart | Sep 1999 | A |
5976075 | Beane et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5979445 | Neame et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5983891 | Fukunaga | Nov 1999 | A |
5983896 | Fukunaqa et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5983897 | Pagan | Nov 1999 | A |
5988167 | Kamen | Nov 1999 | A |
5996582 | Turnbull | Dec 1999 | A |
6003510 | Anunta | Dec 1999 | A |
6003511 | Fukunaga et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6003514 | Pagan | Dec 1999 | A |
6012452 | Pagan | Jan 2000 | A |
6021779 | Paqan | Feb 2000 | A |
6050264 | Greenfield | Apr 2000 | A |
6062219 | Lurie et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070581 | Augustine et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6079409 | Brain et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
D429811 | Bermudez et al. | Aug 2000 | S |
6095144 | Pagan | Aug 2000 | A |
6098621 | Esnouf et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6110143 | Kamen | Aug 2000 | A |
6116243 | Pagan | Sep 2000 | A |
6119695 | Augustine et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6131571 | Lamootang et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6149603 | Parker | Nov 2000 | A |
6155257 | Lurie et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6213120 | Block et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224562 | Lurie et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6234985 | Lurie et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240922 | Pagan | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251093 | Valley et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6269813 | Fitzgerald et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6315739 | Merilainen et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6338343 | Augustine et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6352077 | Shah | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6386199 | Alfery | May 2002 | B1 |
6390093 | Mongeon | May 2002 | B1 |
6422239 | Cook | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6427686 | Augustine et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6439232 | Brain | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6450164 | Banner et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6508250 | Esnouf | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6546931 | Lin et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6631720 | Brain et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6647984 | O'Dea et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6651666 | Owens | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6705318 | Brain | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6766801 | Wright | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6955645 | Zeitels | Oct 2005 | B1 |
7004169 | Brain et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7040322 | Fortuna et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7051096 | Krawiec et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7051736 | Banner et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7096868 | Tateo et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7097802 | Brain et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7128071 | Brain et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7134431 | Brain et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7156100 | Brain et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7159589 | Brain | Jan 2007 | B2 |
RE39938 | Brain | Dec 2007 | E |
7383736 | Esnouf | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7694682 | Petersen et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7895497 | Pisek et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7997274 | Baska | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8033176 | Esnouf | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8413658 | Williams | Apr 2013 | B2 |
9078559 | Tsunoda et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
20020026178 | Ouchi | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20030000534 | Alfery | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030037790 | Brain | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030051734 | Brain | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030101998 | Zecca et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030131845 | Lin | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030168062 | Blythe et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030172925 | Zecca et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030172935 | Miller | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040020491 | Fortuna | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040089307 | Brain | May 2004 | A1 |
20050066975 | Brain | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050081861 | Nasir | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050090712 | Cubb | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050133037 | Russell | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050139220 | Christopher | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050178388 | Kuo | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050199244 | Tateo et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050274383 | Brain | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060124132 | Brain | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060180156 | Baska | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060201516 | Petersen et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060254596 | Brain | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070017527 | Totz | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070089754 | Jones | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070240722 | Kessler | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080041392 | Cook | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080142017 | Brain | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080276936 | Cook | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080308109 | Brain | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090090356 | Cook | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090133701 | Brain | May 2009 | A1 |
20090139524 | Esnouf | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090145438 | Brain | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100059061 | Brain | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100089393 | Brain | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100211140 | Barbut et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100242957 | Fortuna | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249639 | Bhatt | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110023890 | Baska | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110077466 | Rosenthal | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110220117 | Dubach | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110226256 | Dubach | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110245805 | Swinehart et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120085351 | Brain | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120090609 | Dubach | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120145161 | Brain | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120174929 | Esnouf | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120186510 | Esnouf | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20140034060 | Esnouf et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20150209538 | Hansen | Jul 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
647437 | Jun 1991 | AU |
2067782 | Nov 1989 | CA |
2141167 | Jan 1994 | CA |
2012750 | Aug 1999 | CA |
1166138 | Nov 1997 | CN |
2579352 | Oct 2003 | CN |
1863568 | Nov 2006 | CN |
1863568 | Nov 2006 | CN |
2882657 | Mar 2007 | CN |
101057994 | Oct 2007 | CN |
100531818 | Aug 2009 | CN |
201516220 | Jun 2010 | CN |
201684261 | Dec 2010 | CN |
201719659 | Jan 2011 | CN |
101991898 | Mar 2011 | CN |
102335478 | Feb 2012 | CN |
103221087 | Jul 2013 | CN |
2945662 | May 1981 | DE |
4447186 | Jul 1996 | DE |
10042172 | Apr 2001 | DE |
0294200 | Dec 1988 | EP |
0294200 | Dec 1988 | EP |
0389272 | Sep 1990 | EP |
0402872 | Dec 1990 | EP |
0580385 | Jan 1994 | EP |
0712638 | May 1996 | EP |
0732116 | Sep 1996 | EP |
0796631 | Sep 1997 | EP |
0842672 | May 1998 | EP |
0845276 | Jun 1998 | EP |
0865798 | Sep 1998 | EP |
0922465 | Jun 1999 | EP |
0935971 | Aug 1999 | EP |
1119386 | Aug 2001 | EP |
1125595 | Aug 2001 | EP |
1 800 706 | Jun 2007 | EP |
1 938 855 | Jul 2008 | EP |
2 044 969 | Apr 2009 | EP |
1529190 | Oct 1978 | GB |
2111394 | Jul 1983 | GB |
2205499 | Dec 1988 | GB |
2 298 580 | Sep 1996 | GB |
2298580 | Sep 1996 | GB |
2298797 | Sep 1996 | GB |
2317342 | Mar 1998 | GB |
2317830 | Apr 1998 | GB |
2318735 | May 1998 | GB |
2319478 | May 1998 | GB |
2321854 | Aug 1998 | GB |
2323289 | Sep 1998 | GB |
2323290 | Sep 1998 | GB |
2323291 | Sep 1998 | GB |
2323292 | Sep 1998 | GB |
2324737 | Nov 1998 | GB |
2334215 | Aug 1999 | GB |
2359996 | Sep 2001 | GB |
2371990 | Aug 2002 | GB |
2 404 863 | Feb 2005 | GB |
2405588 | Mar 2005 | GB |
2 444 779 | Jun 2008 | GB |
2454199 | May 2009 | GB |
2436294 | Dec 2009 | GB |
2 465 453 | May 2010 | GB |
57-110261 | Jul 1982 | JP |
03039169 | Feb 1991 | JP |
H07-509154 | Oct 1995 | JP |
H08-547 | Jan 1996 | JP |
H09-505211 | May 1997 | JP |
10118182 | May 1998 | JP |
H10-179745 | Jul 1998 | JP |
10216233 | Aug 1998 | JP |
10263086 | Oct 1998 | JP |
10277156 | Oct 1998 | JP |
10314308 | Dec 1998 | JP |
10323391 | Dec 1998 | JP |
10328303 | Dec 1998 | JP |
11128349 | May 1999 | JP |
11192304 | Jul 1999 | JP |
11206885 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2000152995 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2003-511108 | Mar 2003 | JP |
2003528701 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2007-514496 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2007-533337 | Nov 2007 | JP |
2008-136791 | Jun 2008 | JP |
2008-526393 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2366463 | Sep 2009 | RU |
200706196 | Feb 2007 | TW |
200942206 | Oct 2009 | TW |
WO9103207 | Mar 1991 | WO |
WO9107201 | May 1991 | WO |
WO9112845 | Sep 1991 | WO |
WO9213587 | Aug 1992 | WO |
WO 9402191 | Feb 1994 | WO |
WO9402191 | Feb 1994 | WO |
WO9533506 | Dec 1995 | WO |
WO9712640 | Apr 1997 | WO |
WO9712641 | Apr 1997 | WO |
WO9816273 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO9850096 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO9906093 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO 9927840 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO0009189 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0020062 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO0022985 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO0023135 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO0061212 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO0124860 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO0174431 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO0232490 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO 2004016308 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO2004030527 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 04089453 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004089453 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2005011784 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO2005011784 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO2005023350 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005046751 | May 2005 | WO |
WO 2005058402 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO2006026237 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO 06037626 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO 06125986 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO2006125989 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO2007071429 | Oct 2007 | WO |
WO 07131267 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2008001724 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO 2008001724 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO 2009026628 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO 09156949 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO 10060224 | Jun 2010 | WO |
WO 2010060227 | Jun 2010 | WO |
WO 2010066001 | Jun 2010 | WO |
WO2010060226 | Jun 2010 | WO |
WO 2010060226 | Jun 2010 | WO |
WO 2010060227 | Jun 2010 | WO |
WO 10100419 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO 13066195 | May 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for PCT/GB2006/001913, dated Aug. 28, 2006. |
M.O. Abdelatti; “A Cuff Pressure Controller for Tracheal Tubes and Laryngeal Mask Airways” Anaesthesia, 1999, 54, pp. 981-986 (1999 Blackwell Science Ltd). |
Jonathan L. Benumo, M.D.; “Laryngeal Mask Airway and the ASA Difficult Airway Algorithm” Medical Intelligence Article; Anesthesiology, V 84, No. 3, Mar. 1996 (686-99). |
Jonathan L. Benumo, M.D.; “Management of the Difficult Adult Airway” With Special Emphasis on Awake Tracheal Intubation; Anesthesiology V 75, No. 6: 1087-1110, 1991. |
Bernhard, et al.; “Adjustment of Intracuff Pressure to Prevent Aspiration” ; Anesthesiology, vol. 50, No. 4, 363-366, Apr. 1979. |
Bernhard, et al.; “Physical Characteristics of and Rates of Nitrous Oxide Diffusion into Tracheal Tube Cuffs” Anesthesiology, vol. 48, No. 6 Jun. 1978, 413-417. |
A.I.J. Brain, et al.: “The Laryngeal Mask Airway” Anesthesia, 1985, vol. 40, pp. 356-361. |
A.I.J. Brain, et al.: “The Laryngeal Mask Airway—A Possible New Solution to Airway Problems in the Emergency Situation” Archives of Emergency Medicine, 1984, vol. 1, p. 229-232. |
A.I.J. Brain; “The Laryngeal Mask—A New Concept in Airway Management” British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1983, vol. 55, p. 801-805. |
A.I.J. Brain, et al.: “A New Laryngeal Mask Prototype” Anaesthesia, 1995, vol. 50, pp. 42-48. |
A.I.J. Brain; “Three Cases of Difficult Intubation Overcome by the Laryngeal Mask Airway” ; Anaesthesia, 1985, vol. 40, pp. 353-355. |
J. Brimacombe; “The Split Laryngeal Mask Airway” ; Royal Perth Hospital, Perth 6001 Western Australia; Correspondence p. 639. |
P.M. Brodrick et al.; “The Laryngeal Mask Airway” ; Anaesthesia, 1989, vol. 44, pp. 238-241; The Association of Anaesthetists of Gt Britain and Ireland. |
Burgard et al.; “The Effect of Laryngeal Mask Cuff Pressure on Postoperative Sore Throat Incidence” ; Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 8: 198-201, 1996 by Elsevier Science Inc. |
Caplan, et al.; “Adverse Respiratory Events in Anesthesia: A Closed Claims Analysis”; Anesthesiology vol. 72, No. 5: 828-833, May 1990. |
Donald E. Craven, MD; “Prevention of Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia: Meaning Effect in Ounces, Pounds, and Tons”; Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 122, No. 3, Feb. 1, 1995, pp. 229-231. |
“Cuff-Pressure-Control CDR 2000”; LogoMed, Klarenplatz 11, D-53578 Windhagen, pp. 1-4. |
P.R.F. Davies et al.; “Laryngeal Mask Airway and Tracheal Tube Insertion by Unskilled Personnel”; The Lancet, vol. 336, p. 977-979. |
DeMello et al.; “The Use of the Laryngeal Mask Airway in Primary Anaesthesia” Cambridge Military Hospital, Aldershot, Hants GU11 2AN; pp. 793-794. |
Doyle et al.; “Intraoperative Awareness: A Continuing Clinical Problem”; Educational Synopses in Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine the Online Journal of Anesthesiology vol. 3 No. Jun. 6, 1996, pp. 1-8. |
F. Engbers; “Practical Use of ‘Diprifusor’ Systems”; Anaesthesia, 1998, vol. 53, Supplement 1, pp. 28-34; Blackwell Science Ltd. |
Eriksson et al.; “Functional Assessment of the Pharynx at Rest and During Swallowing in Partially Paralyzed Humans” Anesthesiology, vol. 87, No. 5, Nov. 1997, pp. 1035-1042. |
J.B. Glen; “The Development of ‘Diprifusor’: A TCI System for Propofol” Anaesthesia, 1998, vol. 53, Supplement 1, pp. 13-21, Blackwell Science Ltd. |
J.M. Gray et al.; “Development of the Technology for ‘Diprifusor’ TCI Systems”; Anaesthesia, 1998, vol. 53, Supplement 1, pp. 22-27, Blackwell Science Ltd. |
M.L. Heath; “Endotracheal Intubation Through the Laryngeal Mask—Helpful When Laryngoscopy is Difficult or Dangerous”; European Journal of Anaesthesiology 1991, Supplement 4, pp. 41-45. |
S. Hickey et al.; “Cardiovascular Response to Insertion of Brian's Laryngeal Mask”; Anaesthesia, 1990, vol. 45, pp. 629-633, The Association of Anaesthetists of Gt Britain and Ireland. |
Inomata et al.; “Transient Bilateral Vocal Cord Paralysis after Insertion of a Laryngeal Mask Airway”; Anaesthesiology, vol. 82, No. 3, Mar. 1995, pp. 787-788. |
L. Jacobson et al.; “A Study of Intracuff Pressure Measurements, Trends and Behaviour in Patients During Prolonged Periods of Tracheal Intubation” British Journal of Anaesthesia (1981), vol. 53, pp. 97-101; Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 1981. |
V. Kambic et al.; “Intubation Lesions of the Larynx”; British Journal of Anaesthesia (1978), vol. 50, pp. 587-590; Macmillan Journals Ltd. 1978. |
A. Kapila et al.; “Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway: A Preliminary Assessment of Performance”; British Journal of Anaesthesia 1995, vol. 75: pp. 228-229. |
Carl-Eric Lindholm; “Prolonged Endotracheal Intubation” ; Iussu Societatis Anaesthesiologicae Scandinavica Edita Suppllementum XXXIII 1969 v. 33 pp. 29-46. |
S. Majumder et al.; “Bilateral Lingual Nerve Injury Following the Use of the Laryngeal Mask Airway” ; Anaesthesia, 1998, vol. 53, pp. 184-186, 1998 Blackwell Science Ltd. |
Todd Martin; “Patentability of Methods of Medical Treatment: A Comparative Study”; HeinOnLine—82 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc'y 2000, pp. 381-423. |
Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary Tenth Edition, Springfield, Mass, U.S.A. (Convex) p. 254 & (Saddle) p. 1029. |
D.M. Miller; “A Pressure Regulator for the Cuff of a Tracheal Tube” Anaesthesia, 1992, vol. 47, pp. 594-596; 1992 The Association of Anaesthetists of Gt Britain and Ireland. |
Muthuswamy et al.; “The Use of Fuzzy Integrals and Bispectral Analysis of the Electroencephalogram to Preddict Movement Under Anesthesia”; Ieee Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 46, No. 3, Mar. 1999, pp. 291-299. |
K. Nagai et al.; “Unilateral Hypoglossal Nerve Paralysis Following the Use of the Laryngeal Mask Airway”; Anaesthesia, 1994, vol. 49, pp. 603-604; 1994 The Association of Anaesthetists of Gt Britain and Ireland. |
Lars J. Kangas; “Neurometric Assessment of Adequacy of Intraoperative Anesthetic” Medical Technology Brief, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, pp. 1-3. |
Observations by a third party concerning the European Patent Application No. 99947765.6-2318, dated Jan. 18, 2005. |
R.I. Patel et al.; “Tracheal Tube Cuff Pressure”; Anaesthesia, 1984, vol. 39, pp. 862-864; 1984 The Association of Anaesthetists of Gt Britain and Ireland. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/GB2006/001913. |
Pennant et al.; “Comparison of the Endotracheal Tube and Laryngeal Mask in Airway Management by Paramedical Personnel”; Dept of Anesthesiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School; Anesth Analg 1992, vol. 74, pp. 531-534. |
Pippin et al.; “Long-Term Tracheal Intubation Practice in the United Kingdom”; Anaesthesia, 1983, vol. 38, pp. 791-795. |
J.C. Raeder et al.; “Tracheal Tube Cuff Pressures” Anaesthesia, 1985, vol. 40, pp. 444-447; 1985 The Association of Anaesthetists of Gt Britain and Ireland. |
Response to Complaint for matter No. 4b 0 440-05, LMA Deutschland GmbH vs. AMBU (Deutschland) GmbH, dated Feb. 10, 2006. |
Rieger et al.; “Intracuff Pressures Do Not Predict Laryngopharyngeal Discomfort after Use of the Laryngeal Mask Airway”; Anesthesiology 1997, vol. 87, pp. 63-67; 1997 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. |
R D Seegobin et al.; “Endotracheal Cuff Pressure and Tracheal Mucosal Blood Flow: Endoscopic Study of Effects of Four Large Volume Cuffs”; British Medical Jornal, vol. 288, Mar. 31, 1984, pp. 965-968. |
B.A. Willis et al.; “Tracheal Tube Cuff Pressure” Anaesthesia, 1988, vol. 43, pp. 312-314; The Association of Anaesthetists of Gt Britain and Ireland. |
L. Worthington et al.; “Performance of Vaporizers in Circle Systems” British Journal of Anaesthesia 1995, vol. 75. |
J. Michael Wynn, M.D.; “Tongue Cyanosis after Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion” Anesthesiology, vol. 80, No. 6, Jun. 1994, p. 1403. |
Brimacombe, Joseph R., “Laryngeal Mask Anesthesia” Second Edition, Saunders 2005. |
“Anaesthetic and respiratory equipment—Supralaryngeal airways and connectors”, International Standard Controlled, ISO 11712, ISO 2009. |
Miller, Donald, “A Proposed Classification and Scoring System for Supraglottic Sealing Airways: A Brief Review”, Anesth Analg 2004; 99:1553-9. |
Benumof, Jonathan, “The Glottic Aperture Seal Airway. A New Ventilatory Device”, Anesthesiology, V. 88, No. 5., May 1998, pp. 1219-1226. |
McIntyre, John, “History of Anaesthesia” Oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal airways: I (1880-1995), Can. J. Anaesth 1996, vol. 43, vol. 6, pp. 629-635. |
Ishimura, et al., “Impossible Insertion of the Laryngeal Mask Airway and Oropharyngeal Axes”, Anesthesiology, V. 83, No. 4., Oct 1995, pp. 867-869. |
Verghese, et al., “Clinical assessment of the single use laryngeal mask airway—the LMA-Unique”, British Journal of Anaesthesia 1998; vol. 80: 677-679. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140323806 A1 | Oct 2014 | US |