Laryngoscope with means to restrict re-use of blades

Abstract
A medical device for carrying out internal examination, such as laryngoscopes, has a body including a transmitter and receiver, and a blade portion including a receiver and transmitter. The transmitters and receivers are used to provide an indication of whether or not a particular blade portion has already been attached to a body portion previously.
Description

The present invention relates to medical devices for carrying out internal examination and relates particularly to laryngoscopes to assist intubation of a tracheal tube that have disposable sections.


Insertion of a tracheal tube is an important procedure in providing an airway to an anaesthetist prior to a surgical operation. Tracheal tubes also often need to be inserted in an emergency situation into the airway of an unconscious patient by paramedics or doctors. Insertion of a tracheal tube requires significant skill, and laryngoscopes are generally used to assist the insertion of the tube by restraining the patient's tongue and allowing a clear view of the larynx and the entrance to the trachea. Considerable skill and care is required in carrying out this procedure in order to avoid damage to the patient's teeth and soft tissue of the throat.


Often problems occur when a practitioner is attempting to intubate a patient using a laryngoscope as it is often difficult for the practitioner to see what is going on.


Figures show that in approximately 12% of cases trauma occurs during intubation (which affects a large number of people when you consider there are over 12 million intubations carried out annually).


A UK wide study found 50% of apparently clean laryngoscope handles waiting for re-use to be contaminated with blood from previous procedures. This is due to design flaws in the traditional laryngoscope and ineffective cleaning practice within hospitals. Where disposable single use surgical instruments have already been introduced, 12% of hospitals are actually re-using them due to the high cost of replacement. Making the situation worse, these elements are often never cleaned due to the assumption of single use sterility.


Obviously in order to use a laryngoscope on a patient, it is important to know that the laryngoscope is cleaned sufficiently and there is no risk of cross contamination between patients. There is evidence to show that standard cleaning procedures are not always fully effective at removing contaminants such as bacteria from the laryngoscope (J R Hall. ‘Blood contamination of equipment . . . ’ Anaesthesia and Analgesia. 1994; 78:1136-9 M D Ester, L C Baines, D J Wilkinson & R M Langford. ‘Decontamination of Laryngoscopes: a survey of national practice.’ Anaesthesia, 1999, 54).


Typically, in order to clean a laryngoscope, the blade is soaked and autoclaved. The handle can undergo a similar procedure or can simply be wiped down as it does not make contact with the patient as the blade does. The cleaning takes a significant amount of time, which means that it is necessary to have a number of handles and blades in rotation to ensure that there are always clean laryngoscopes available if required. This results in a time consuming and costly procedure needing to be put in place.


In order to try and overcome the problems associated with laryngoscope disposable blades have been suggested for use. Unfortunately, it is common in practice that the blades are still used multiple times before being discarded. Flexible protective sheaths can also be used which slip over a standard laryngoscope blade to act as a guard. While useful, it is optional to a user whether the sheath is used or not. For the user, existing blades perform better without the sheath, which distorts light output and, as a result, existing sheaths are rarely used.


The present invention attempts to improve upon the prior art.


Throughout this Application the term blade should be read in a broad sense to cover not only laryngoscope blades but also to cover speculums or elements that are inserted into body cavities.


According to a first aspect of the present invention, there is provided a medical device comprising a body portion and a blade portion, wherein the blade portion is separable from the body portion characterised by the medical device being provided with spoiling means for indicating if a particular blade portion has already been attached to the body portion previously.


Optionally, the spoiling means will prevent reattachment of a blade that has already been attached to a body portion previously.


Preferably, the spoiling means comprises transmitting and receiving means in the body, which send and receive signals respectively with receiving and transmitting means in the blade.


Preferably the receiving means in the body can determine from the transmitting means in the blade, if the blade has previously been brought into close proximity of a body.


Preferably the transmitting means is a radio frequency transmitter.


Preferably the receiving means is a radio frequency receiver.


Optionally, the receiving means in the body will count the number of blades it contacts in its life.


Optionally, the spoiling means comprises a device for tripping electrical contacts to prevent their continued use.


Optionally the spoiling means comprises elements that cause a physical change if a particular blade portion has already been attached to the body portion previously.


Alternatively, the spoiling means comprises locking elements that break off when the blade and body are separated.


Preferably the locking elements comprise a male protrusion and a female ingression, one of which is provided on the blade and one of which is provided on the body.


Preferably the male protrusion is provided with a weakened section.


Preferably the female ingression is provided with a weakened section.





In order to provide a better understanding of the present invention, embodiments will now be described by way of example only, and with reference to the following Figures, in which:



FIG. 1 shows a cross section view of a laryngoscope according to a first aspect of the present invention.



FIG. 2 shows a cross section view of a laryngoscope according to a second aspect of the present invention.





In the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the medical device is a laryngoscope that can be used for intubation of a tracheal tube.


According to the present invention, there is a provided a laryngoscope 1 which has a disposable blade 3. The blade 3 is the section that comes into contact with the patient during examination. Therefore, after use the blade 3 can be disposed of and the remaining parts of the laryngoscope 1 re-used.


One of the benefits of the disposability of the blade 3 is that there will be no cross-contamination to patients, and no lengthy cleaning procedures are required. However, to ensure that a blade 3 is not reused, a spoiling mechanism is incorporated into the laryngoscope laryngoscope 1.


In one embodiment, a mother chip 4 is provided in the body 2 of the laryngoscope 1. A corresponding radio frequency tag 5 that can be recognised by the mother chip 4 is provided in the disposable blade 3. The radio frequency tag 5 is provided with a serial number and each radio frequency tag 5 has a unique serial number. When the radio frequency tag 5 and the mother chip 4 are brought into close contact i.e. by the blade 3 being attached to the body section 2, the mother chip 4 can read the serial number. If the mother chip recognises the serial number from a previous occasion this will be indicated to the user.


Alternatively, the radio frequency tag does not have a serial number, but the mother chip electronically marks the radio frequency tag, so that it can be recognised as having previously being in contact with another body. This is the preferred embodiment.


In the preferred embodiment, the body 2 is provided with a monitor 6. If the mother chip 4 recognises a serial number, or any other electronic signal on a radio frequency tag 5 of a blade that is being attached, a computer program will be in place to display a message on a monitor which is attached to the body 2 informing the user. The mother chip 4 will typically be able to both read the blade chip and write on it. This would allow a blade chip to be electronically written on in a manner that means it would be recognised by any body section that it is attached to. This is the preferred embodiment as it ensures that in emergencies for example when a paramedic is called to a scene with a significant number of casualties, a blade 3 can be re-used if absolutely necessary. It would also allow the storage of the date, time, patient details and other information, if required. An alternative to the radio frequency messaging described above would be to use a mother chip 4a that is an optical reader. There would be a mechanism for physically marking a blade 3 that has previously been used, and this physical mark would be recognised by the mother chip 4a. The physical Marks may be surface scoring, discolouring, exposure to light or faint fracture points/lines designed to appear after pressure has been applied during use.


The benefit of the abovementioned options is that the mother chip 4 or 4a could be programmed to allow a certain number of re-uses which may be within a defined period, or allow a manual override in emergency situations.


Alternatively, the spoiling mechanism can take the form of a breaking of electrical connections when the blade 3 and body 2 are parted, such that if the same blade 3 and body 2 are reconnected, no power is provided to anything inserted into the core 6 of the blade 3. A further alternative is that the blade 3 may comprise protrusions which are able to fix into ingressions in the body 2 of the laryngoscope 1, such that the protrusions break off when the blade 3 is removed from the body 2, such that the blade 3 cannot then be reused. These alternatives may be more useful in non-emergency areas such as operating theatres for routine surgery where the need to re-use a blade 3 in extreme circumstances is less likely to occur.


It can be seen that the current invention has a number of benefits over the prior art and a number of possible uses. Although the examples above relate to a laryngoscope, it can be seen that the concept can be extended to other medical and veterinary devices and still stay within the scope of the present invention. The fact that the blade is fully disposable is of great importance, as it means that practitioners are required to change blades and the product is both simple to use and cheap to manufacture.


It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that the above embodiment has been described by way of example only, and not in any limiting sense, and that various alterations and modifications are possible without departure from the scope of the invention as defined by the appended Claims.

Claims
  • 1. A laryngoscope comprising: a body portion comprising a chip disposed on a first body end;a blade portion separate from the body portion and comprising a first blade end and a second blade end, wherein the first blade end is configured to be removably coupled to the first body end, and wherein the chip comprises a radio frequency transmitter and a radio frequency receiver configured to send and receive signals, respectively, with a tag comprising a radio frequency receiver and a radio frequency transmitter in the blade portion and storing identification information for the blade portion, wherein the chip in the body portion, when brought into close proximity of the blade portion, is configured to read the identification information from the tag and determine if the blade has been previously brought into close proximity of the body portion, and wherein the chip is programmed to allow a certain number of re-uses of the blade portion; anda monitor disposed on the body portion and configured to display the identification information read by the chip to inform a user of a use status of the blade portion.
  • 2. A laryngoscope as in claim 1, wherein the radio frequency receiver in the body portion is adapted to count the number of blades the body portion comes into close proximity with.
  • 3. A laryngoscope as in claim 1, wherein the chip comprises a device for tripping electrical contacts to prevent their continued use.
  • 4. A laryngoscope as in claim 1, wherein the tag includes a serial number, and wherein the chip is programmed to read the serial number.
  • 5. A laryngoscope as in claim 1, wherein the chip is programmed to electronically mark the tag on the blade portion such that the blade portion is recognized as having previously been in contact with the body portion.
  • 6. The laryngoscope of claim 1, wherein the identification information comprises a date, time, patient information, and information associated with the use status of the blade portion.
  • 7. A laryngoscope comprising: a body portion, comprising a chip, the chip including a first receiver and a first transmitter, anda blade portion, comprising a tag including a second receiver and a second transmitter,wherein the first receiver and first transmitter in the chip are operable to send and receive signals respectively with the second transmitter and the second receiver in the tag,wherein the blade portion is separable from the body portion, andwherein the chip, when brought into close proximity of the blade portion, is configured to read identification information stored in the tag and to provide an output to indicate if the blade portion has been previously brought into close proximity of the body portion, andwherein the chip is programmed to determine from the first receiver and the second transmitter if the blade has been previously brought into close proximity of the body portion and to allow a certain number of re-uses of the blade portion on a patient that is different from a patient that previously used the blade portion.
  • 8. A laryngoscope according to claim 7, wherein the chip is programmed to allow a manual override once the blade portion is connected to the body portion.
  • 9. The laryngoscope of claim 7, comprising a monitor disposed on the body portion and configured to display the identification information and inform a user of the laryngoscope a use status of the blade portion.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
0309754.0 Apr 2003 GB national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 371c Date
PCT/GB2004/001844 4/29/2004 WO 00 12/28/2006
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2004/096031 11/11/2004 WO A
US Referenced Citations (77)
Number Name Date Kind
3643654 Felbarg Feb 1972 A
4086919 Bullard May 1978 A
4113137 Wind Sep 1978 A
4126127 May Nov 1978 A
4306547 Lowell Dec 1981 A
4384570 Roberts May 1983 A
4406280 Upsher Sep 1983 A
4556052 Muller Dec 1985 A
4573451 Bauman Mar 1986 A
4742819 George May 1988 A
4832003 Yabe May 1989 A
4832020 Augustine May 1989 A
4930495 Upsher Jun 1990 A
4934773 Becker Jun 1990 A
4982729 Wu Jan 1991 A
5003963 Bullard et al. Apr 1991 A
5203320 Augustine Apr 1993 A
5233426 Suzuki et al. Aug 1993 A
5239983 Katsurada Aug 1993 A
5261392 Wu Nov 1993 A
5339805 Parker Aug 1994 A
5349943 Ruiz Sep 1994 A
5355870 Lacy Oct 1994 A
5363838 George Nov 1994 A
5373317 Salvati et al. Dec 1994 A
5381787 Bullard Jan 1995 A
D358471 Cope et al. May 1995 S
5413092 Williams, III et al. May 1995 A
5443058 Ough Aug 1995 A
5513627 Flam May 1996 A
5551946 Bullard Sep 1996 A
5594497 Ahern et al. Jan 1997 A
5645519 Lee et al. Jul 1997 A
5676635 Levin Oct 1997 A
5701904 Simmons et al. Dec 1997 A
5702351 Bar-Or et al. Dec 1997 A
5734418 Danna Mar 1998 A
5734718 Prafullchandra Mar 1998 A
5754313 Pelchy et al. May 1998 A
5762605 Cane et al. Jun 1998 A
5800342 Lee et al. Sep 1998 A
5800344 Wood, Sr. et al. Sep 1998 A
5827178 Berall Oct 1998 A
5827428 Chang Oct 1998 A
5846186 Upsher Dec 1998 A
5873818 Rothfels Feb 1999 A
5879289 Yarush et al. Mar 1999 A
5879304 Shuchman et al. Mar 1999 A
5895350 Hori Apr 1999 A
6056716 D'Antonio et al. May 2000 A
6080101 Tatsuno et al. Jun 2000 A
6095972 Sakamoto Aug 2000 A
6354993 Kaplan et al. Mar 2002 B1
6543447 Pacey Apr 2003 B2
6676598 Rudischhauser et al. Jan 2004 B2
6826422 Modell et al. Nov 2004 B1
6847490 Nordstrom et al. Jan 2005 B1
6964637 Dalle et al. Nov 2005 B2
7001330 Kobayashi Feb 2006 B2
7001366 Ballard Feb 2006 B2
7128710 Cranton et al. Oct 2006 B1
7156091 Koyama et al. Jan 2007 B2
7182728 Cubb et al. Feb 2007 B2
7214184 McMorrow May 2007 B2
7448377 Koyama et al. Nov 2008 B2
20010051766 Gazdzinski Dec 2001 A1
20020022769 Smith et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020038076 Sheehan et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020087050 Rudischhauser et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020107436 Barton et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020198554 Whitman et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030195390 Graumann Oct 2003 A1
20040015132 Brown Jan 2004 A1
20040127770 McGrath Jul 2004 A1
20050090712 Cubb Apr 2005 A1
20060129031 Roberts et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060276694 Acha Gandarias Dec 2006 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (27)
Number Date Country
0653180 Oct 1998 EP
0901772 Mar 1999 EP
1188420 Mar 2002 EP
1 285 623 Feb 2003 EP
1285623 Feb 2003 EP
2830428 Apr 2003 FR
2 086 732 May 1982 GB
61141342 Jun 1986 JP
2000175867 Jun 2000 JP
8301373 Apr 1983 WO
WO-8911305 Nov 1989 WO
WO-9104703 Apr 1991 WO
WO-9513023 May 1995 WO
WO-9819589 May 1998 WO
WO-9841137 Sep 1998 WO
WO-9927840 Jun 1999 WO
WO-9944490 Sep 1999 WO
WO-0074556 Dec 2000 WO
WO-0110293 Feb 2001 WO
WO-0178582 Oct 2001 WO
WO-0178582 Oct 2001 WO
WO-0211608 Feb 2002 WO
WO-02056756 Jul 2002 WO
WO-02095675 Nov 2002 WO
WO-03015619 Feb 2003 WO
WO-03077738 Sep 2003 WO
WO-03077738 Sep 2003 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (24)
Entry
Woodson, “Retropalatal Airway Characteristics in Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty Compared With Transpalatal Advacement Pharyngoplasty”; Laryngoscope 107, Jun. 1997, pp. 735-740.
Satava, “A technologic framework for the future”; Surgical Endoscopy (1993) 7: 111-113.
Meinke, et al, “What is the learning curve for laparoscopic appendectomy?”; Surgical Endoscopy (1994) 8: 371-375.
Cunningham, “Laparpscopic surgery—anesthetic implications”; Surgical Endoscopy (1994) 8: 1272-1284.
Siker ES, “A Mirror Laryngoscope”, Anaesthesiology 17:38-42, 1956.
Australian Search Report.
International Search Report.
Murphy, et al. “Rigid and Semirigid Fiberoptic Intubation”, Manual of Emergency Airway Management, The Airways, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2004.
Crosby, et al., “The Unanticipated Difficult Airway With Recomendations for Management”, Can J Anaesth 1998 pp. 757-776.
Biro, et al., “Comparison of Two Video-Assisted Techniques for the Difficult Intubation”, 2001, pp. 761-765.
Bellhouse, et al., “An Angulated Laryngoscope for Routine and Difficult Trachael Intubation”, 1997, pp. 126-129.
Pearce, et al., “Evaluation of the Upsherscope”, 1996, pp. 561-564.
Smith, et al., The Complexity of Trachael Intubation Using Rigid Fiberoptic Laryngoscopy (WuScope), Anesth Analg, 1999, pp. 236-239.
Cooper, “Use of a New Videolaryngoscope (GlideScope®) in the Management of a Difficult Airway”, Can J Anesth, 2003, pp. 611-613.
Dullenkopf, et al., “Video-enhanced Visualization of he Larynx and intubation with teh Bullard Laryngoscope—equipment report” Can J Anesth 2003, pp. 507-510.
Thompson, “A New Video Laryngoscope”, Anaesthesia, 2004, pp. 410.
Esler, et al., “Decontaminationoflaryngoscopes: asurveyofnational Practice”, Anaesthesia, 1999, pp. 582-598.
Morrell, et al., “A Survey of Laryngoscope Contamination at a University and a Community Hospital”, Anesthesiology, 1994, pp. 960.
Weiss, M. “Video-intuboscopy: a new aid to routine and difficult tracheal intubation”, British Journal of Anaesthesia 1998; 80: 525-527.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/067,205.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/074,355.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/060,891.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/223,330.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/732,129.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20070299313 A1 Dec 2007 US