The present invention relates to systems and methods for performing laser-assisted corneal surgery, and, more particularly, to such systems and methods for integrating the cutting of a corneal flap with wavefront-guided refractive laser surgery.
It is known in the art to perform corneal ablation by means of wavefront-guided refractive laser surgery. Typically a wavefront sensor measures an aberration map and its position relative to anatomical landmarks, which can be intrinsic or externally applied features. Aberration data, sometimes along with geometric registration information, can be transferred directly to a treatment excimer laser.
It is also known to use a femtosecond laser to cut a corneal flap prior to performing the corneal ablation. However, these procedures are not known to be coordinated, nor is a system known for optimizing the flap-cutting procedure within the limits of a flap-cutting device.
Therefore, it would be advantageous to provide a system and method for coordinating corneal ablation with the flap-cutting procedure and for optimizing same.
The present invention is directed to a system and method for performing wavefront-guided laser surgery on a cornea. The method comprises the step of calculating a corneal flap configuration based upon collected anatomical information on an eye and wavefront data on a cornea of the eye. Such data may be collected by, for example, an aberrometer, although this is not intended as a limitation.
The calculated configuration is transmitted to a processor in controlling relation to a corneal flap-cutting device. The flap-cutting device is used to create a corneal flap based upon the calculated configuration.
A system for performing wavefront-guided laser surgery on a cornea comprises a processor and means for transmitting to the processor anatomical information collected on an eye and wavefront data collected on a cornea of the eye.
A software package is installable on the processor that is adapted to calculate a corneal flap configuration based upon the anatomical information and wavefront data. The corneal flap configuration can be an optimal flap configuration within the limits of the software package, the processor and the anatomical information and wavefront data provided to the processor, as well as based on any other predefined limits imposed by the software for a given application. The software package is also adapted to control a corneal flap-cutting device to cut a corneal flap commensurate with the calculated optimal corneal flap configuration.
The features that characterize the invention, both as to organization and method of operation, together with further objects and advantages thereof, will be better understood from the following description used in conjunction with the accompanying drawing. It is to be expressly understood that the drawing is for the purpose of illustration and description and is not intended as a definition of the limits of the invention. These and other objects attained, and advantages offered, by the present invention will become more fully apparent as the description that now follows is read in conjunction with the accompanying drawing.
A more complete understanding of the present invention and the advantages thereof may be acquired by referring to the following description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which like reference numbers indicate like features and wherein:
A description of the preferred embodiments of the present invention will now be presented with reference to
The method 100 for performing wavefront-guided laser surgery on a cornea comprises the step of collecting anatomical information on an eye and wavefront data on a cornea using an aberrometer 11 (block 101). The collected anatomical information and wavefront data are transmitted to a processor 12 (block 102), which can comprise a memory 18 having a software package 13 installed thereon.
The software package 13 includes code segments for calculating a corneal flap configuration, which can be an optimal corneal flap configuration, based upon the collected anatomical information and wavefront data (block 103). The optimal flap configuration-may include, for example, an optimal flap geometry. A database 14 is accessible by the processor 12, the database 14 containing data on previously performed corneal laser surgery (block 104). The data may include data from prior cases for trend analysis, and may include changes in wavefront profiles along actual flap geometry, so that any consistent effects of specific flap creations on aberration profiles can be factored into future treatments. An optimal ablation profile can thus be calculated using the collected anatomical information, the wavefront data, and the accessed data (block 105).
The processor 12 is further in controlling relation to a corneal flap-cutting device, for example, a femtosecond laser microkeratome 15. The femtosecond laser microkeratome 15, under control of the software package 13 stored in memory 18, is used to create a corneal flap based upon the calculated configuration (block 106). A reference mark may also be made on the corneal flap during the flap-cutting step for use in tracking a corneal position during laser surgery (block 107). The created configuration of the corneal flap is then measured (block 108), since the actual flap created may differ from the ideal target flap configuration in position and/or shape. These measured data are transmitted to the processor 12 (block 109).
The, using the anatomical information, the wavefront data, and the corneal flap measured configuration, a laser ablation pattern is calculated (block 110), and a treatment laser 16, for example, an excimer laser, is controlled by the processor 12 and software package 13 to create the calculated laser ablation pattern (block 111).
In the foregoing description, certain terms have been used for brevity, clarity, and understanding, but no unnecessary limitations are to be implied therefrom beyond the requirements of the prior art, because such words are used for description purposes herein and are intended to be broadly construed. Moreover, the embodiments of the apparatus illustrated and described herein are by way of example, and the scope of the invention is not limited to the exact details of construction.
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/703,671, filed Jul. 29, 2005, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6210399 | Parel et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6299309 | Ruiz | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6908196 | Herekar et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7226443 | Campin et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7237898 | Hohla et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
20020052615 | Ross et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020082629 | Cox et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020111607 | Bille | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030100893 | Bille | May 2003 | A1 |
20030208190 | Roberts et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040054358 | Cox et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040116910 | Markman | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050096640 | Dai et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050187540 | Mrochen et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060173445 | Bille | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070161972 | Felberg et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Touboul D, Salin F, Mortemousque B, Chabassier P, Mottay E, Léger F, Colin J.,Advantages and disadvantages of the femtosecond laser microkeratome,J Fr Ophtalmol. May 2005;28(5):535-46. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070027439 A1 | Feb 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60703671 | Jul 2005 | US |