Generally, the field of the present invention is laser patterning. More particularly, the present invention relates to methods for patterning multi-layer stackups of materials.
Touch screens are gaining traction in the electronics industry due to the increasingly high demand for smartphones, tablet computers, and all-in-one computers. An industry objective has been to reduce the overall thickness of the device, so decreasing the touch sensor thickness is an integral part of obtaining thinner devices. One idea to reduce the sensor thickness is to use a single film. The single film is typically a layered composite structure that has more than one conductive film layers on the same substrate. The conductive layers are typically separated by a thin insulating material. Overall separation of the conductive layers is in the micron range. The small separation between layers has been problematic for patterning the layers, particularly as conventional laser techniques involve a large amount of heat for ablation of a selected layer which often introducing structural change to subsequent or adjacent layers. Accordingly, there remains a need for a laser patterning method that is at least capable of overcoming the attendant drawbacks of conventional techniques applied to multi-layer composites.
According to one aspect of the present invention, a method of laser patterning a multi-layer structure, the multi-layer structure including a substrate, a first layer disposed on the substrate, a second layer disposed on the first layer, and a third layer disposed on the second layer, the method includes generating at least one laser pulse having laser parameters selected for non-ablatively changing the conductivity a selected portion of the third layer such that the selected portion becomes non-conductive, and directing the pulse to the multi-layer structure,
wherein the conductivity of the first layer is not substantially changed by the pulse.
In another aspect of the invention a method of forming a multi-layer stack-up structure, includes providing a substrate, depositing a first layer on the substrate, the first layer being conductive, laser patterning the first layer such that selected portions of the first layer become non-conductive, depositing a second layer on the first layer, the second layer being insulating, depositing a third layer on the second layer, the third layer being conductive, and non-ablatively laser patterning the third layer such that selected portions of the third layer become non-conductive without substantially changing the conductivity of the first layer.
The foregoing and other objects, features, and advantages will become more apparent from the following detailed description, which proceeds with reference to the accompanying figures.
In general, the processes and materials discussed herein can be useful in touch sensor fabrication and other applications for conductive substrates. Touch sensors typically comprise a film composite of various materials which become stacked together through one or more deposition or lamination processes. A variety of stack-up configurations is possible, and various intermediate processing steps can be implemented during the fabrication of the multiple layers. For example, different multi-layer structures described herein can have layers arranged in a different order than as disclosed in the drawings. In some embodiments, deposited material layers can be disposed on one or both sides of a substrate. In further embodiments, the pulsed laser beam can be incident from the opposite direction as shown. Different types of materials can be used for the different layers, the ones being discussed herein being some suitable examples. It will be appreciated that many different configurations and variations are possible that are within the scope of the present invention.
Reference is now made to
The insulating layer 16 can include one or more dopants that increase the ability of the layer 16 to scatter or absorb incident laser energy so as to reduce the amount of residual fluence that is incident on the first layer 14. In
In
With reference to
Conductive regions or layers are processed non-ablatively so they can be used in a touch-sensitive screen in electronic devices or in other devices related to printed electronics or optoelectronics, including devices benefiting from low damage, low visibility processing of substrates or where precision is required. As used herein, ablative processing is understood to mean substantial removal of material from a target caused by an incident optical beam by vaporization, photochemical alteration, or otherwise. Similarly, non-ablative processing is understood to mean that the structural features of the existing target surface topology remain intact after processing, even if electrical or other properties of the target are changed.
In some cases, the layers of conductive materials include a random arrangement of silver nanowires. The silver nanowires of such layers can be secured to a substrate in a polymer matrix, such as an organic overcoat. A laser beam can deliver laser pulses to such a layer and create a processed portion where the conductivity of the material of conductive layer is substantially changed such that the processed portion is effectively non-conducting. As used herein, the terms “conductive” and “nonconductive” have meanings attributed to them that are generally understood in the art of printed electronics, touch sensor patterning, or optoelectronics. For example, suitable sheet resistances for a material such that it may be considered conductive include 30-250 Ω/sq, and suitable sheet resistances or electrical isolation measurements for a material such that the material may be considered non-conductive or electrically isolated include resistances greater than or equal to about 20 MΩ/sq. However, these sheet resistances are merely examples, and other conductive and non-conductive ranges may apply depending on the requirements of the particular application. Some processed substrates may be considered sufficiently conductive with sheet resistances below 500 Ω/sq, 1 kΩ/sq, 5 kΩ/sq, or 10 kΩ/sq, and may be considered non-conductive with sheet resistances greater than or equal to about 100 kΩ/sq, 1 MΩ/sq, or 100 MΩ/sq.
Laser pulses can be directed to the composite in various patterns such that particular regions and electrical pathways are formed on the substrate. By carefully selecting the characteristics of the laser pulse parameters, including pulse length, pulse fluence, pulse energy, spot size, pulse repetition rate, and scan speed, the substrate may be processed such that electrical characteristics thereof are altered in a predetermined way while the substrate and associated protective and conductive layers are not substantially damaged or structurally altered (e.g., ablatively).
Exemplary laser pulse parameters suitable for non-ablative processing of a conductive layer include a pulse length of about 50 ps, pulse fluence of about 0.17 J/cm2, a spot size of about 40 μm (1/e2), a scan rate of about 1 m/s with a pulse-to-pulse overlap of greater than 90%, a total pulse energy of about 12 μl, and a pulse repetition rate of about 100 kHz, using optical radiation having a wavelength of 1064 nm (which has been found to interact with the substrate and other materials to a lesser extent than light of shorter wavelengths). Various other parameters are also suitable. For example, pulse repetition rates can be increased to 1 MHz, to 10 MHz, or to greater than 10 MHz to increase processing speeds. Pulse length can be selected to be shorter or longer. Pulse fluence can be adjusted to ensure that the target is processed non-ablatively. Possible pulse lengths include less than about 1 ps, 100 ps, 200 ps, 500 ps, 800 ps, or 1 ns. Other parameters can similarly be varied and optimized accordingly. Laser parameters suitable for non-ablative laser processing can be selected based in part on the relevant properties of the materials selected to be processed. For example, varying thickness of the substrate, the conductive layer, etc., can affect how laser pulse heat is distributed or result in other time-dependent effects requiring mitigation.
While beams for processing are generally brought to a focus at the structure, other beam geometrical configurations and intensity distributions are possible, including an unfocused beam, line beams, square or rectangular beams, as well as beams with uniform, substantially uniform or preselected intensity profiles across one or more transverse axes. In some cases, a composite can be translated to help achieve geometrical features on its surface. In some cases, one or more laser beams impinge on a composite from either a top or back side direction so that the beam propagates through the substrate to the conductive layer such that the beam causes ablative or non-ablative changes to a conductive layer. In some cases, laser pulses cause a processed portion of a conductive layer to become non-conductive without changing the visible characteristics of the processed portion. Similarly, laser pulses can process a conductive border either ablatively or non-ablatively. Laser ablation of a conductive border can be achieved by increasing the energy content of the laser beam incident on the target surface. For example, the laser pulse parameters can be adjusted by increasing the pulse length, pulse fluence, total pulse energy, by using shorter wavelengths, or by decreasing the spot size. Suitable laser systems capable generally include pulsed fiber lasers, pulsed fiber amplifiers, and diode pumped solid-state lasers.
It is thought that the present invention and many of the attendant advantages thereof will be understood from the foregoing description and it will be apparent that various changes may be made in the parts thereof without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention or sacrificing all of its material advantages, the forms hereinbefore described being merely exemplary embodiments thereof.
This is the U.S. National Stage of International Application No. PCT/US2014/017841, filed Feb. 21, 2014, which was published in English under PCT Article 21(2), which in turn claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Nos. 61/767,420 filed Feb. 21, 2013, 61/818,881 filed May 2, 2013, and 61/875,679 filed Sep. 9, 2013. The provisional and PCT applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2014/017841 | 2/21/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/130895 | 8/28/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3388461 | Lins | Jun 1968 | A |
4713518 | Yamazaki et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4863538 | Deckard | Sep 1989 | A |
5008555 | Mundy | Apr 1991 | A |
5252991 | Storlie et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5509597 | Laferriere | Apr 1996 | A |
5523543 | Hunter, Jr. et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5932119 | Kaplan et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
RE37585 | Mourou et al. | Mar 2002 | E |
6362004 | Noblett | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6426840 | Partanen et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6490376 | Au et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6577314 | Yoshida et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
7349123 | Clarke et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7781778 | Moon et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8071912 | Costin, Sr. et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8237788 | Cooper et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8251475 | Murray et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8269108 | Kunishi et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8310009 | Saran et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8414264 | Bolms et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8442303 | Cheng et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8472099 | Fujino et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8809734 | Cordingley et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
9537042 | Dittli | Jan 2017 | B2 |
20010050364 | Tanaka et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20030213998 | Hsu et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040112634 | Tanaka et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040207936 | Yamamoto et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050168847 | Sasaki | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050233557 | Tanaka et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060275705 | Dorogy et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070075060 | Shedlov et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080246024 | Touwslager et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090122377 | Wagner | May 2009 | A1 |
20090274833 | Li | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090314752 | Manens et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100025387 | Arai et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100225974 | Sandstrom | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100230665 | Verschuren et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110080476 | Dinauer et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110127697 | Milne | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110133365 | Ushimaru et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110187025 | Costin, Sr. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110278277 | Stork Genannt Wersborg | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110279826 | Miura et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120127097 | Gaynor et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120145685 | Ream et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120148823 | Chu | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120156458 | Chu | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120295071 | Sato | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120301733 | Eckert et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120301737 | Labelle et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130005139 | Krasnov | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130022754 | Bennett et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130023086 | Chikama et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130027648 | Moriwaki | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130095260 | Bovatsek et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130228442 | Mohaptatra et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130299468 | Unrath et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140104618 | Potsaid et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140155873 | Bor | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140332254 | Pellerite et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140333931 | Lu et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150165556 | Jones et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150352664 | Errico et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160158889 | Carter et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160187646 | Ehrmann | Jun 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1217030 | Aug 2005 | CN |
1926460 | Mar 2007 | CN |
1966224 | May 2007 | CN |
101836309 | Oct 2007 | CN |
101143405 | Mar 2008 | CN |
101303269 | Nov 2008 | CN |
101314196 | Dec 2008 | CN |
102448623 | Mar 2009 | CN |
101733561 | Jun 2010 | CN |
201783759 | Apr 2011 | CN |
102084282 | Jun 2011 | CN |
102176104 | Sep 2011 | CN |
102207618 | Oct 2011 | CN |
102301200 | Dec 2011 | CN |
102441740 | May 2012 | CN |
203 20 269 | Apr 2004 | DE |
2587564 | May 2013 | EP |
H02220314 | Sep 1990 | JP |
2006-106227 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2008-281395 | Nov 2008 | JP |
10-2011-0109957 | Oct 2011 | KR |
2008742 | Feb 1994 | RU |
2021881 | Oct 1994 | RU |
553430 | Sep 2003 | TW |
200633062 | Sep 2006 | TW |
I271904 | Jan 2007 | TW |
200707466 | Feb 2007 | TW |
201307949 | Feb 2013 | TW |
WO 1995011100 | Apr 1995 | WO |
WO 1995011101 | Apr 1995 | WO |
WO 2012102655 | Aug 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Official Letter and Search Report from the Taiwan Intellectual Property Office for related Application No. 102139285, 8 pages, dated Nov. 21, 2016 (w/ Eng. trans.). |
Second Office Action from Chinese Application No. 201410455972.X, dated Nov. 22, 2016, 22 pages (with English translation). |
Giannini et al., “Anticipating, measuring, and minimizing MEMS mirror scan error to improve laser scanning microscopy's speed and accuracy,” PLOS ONE, 14 pages (Oct. 3, 2017). |
Kummer et al., “Method to quantify accuracy of position feedback signals of a three-dimensional two-photon laser-scanning microscope,” Biomedical Optics Express, 6(10):3678-3693 (Sep. 1, 2015). |
Office Action (w/ English translation) for related Korea Application No. 10-2014-0120247, dated Oct. 18, 2017, 6 pages. |
Search Report from the Taiwan Intellectual Property Office for related Application No. 102139285, 10 pages, dated Sep. 4, 2017 (w/ Eng. trans.). |
Second Office Action from Chinese Application No. 201480019324.8, dated Nov. 16, 2017, 21 pages (with English translation). |
PC1-6110, Multifunction I/O Device, http.//www.ni.com/en-us-support/model.pci-6110.html, downloaded Dec. 15, 2017, 1 page. |
First Office Action from Chinese Application No. 201410455972.X, dated Jan. 26, 2016, 21 pages (with English translation). |
Official Letter and Search Report from the Taiwan Intellectual Property Office for related Application No. 103106020, 21 pages, dated Apr. 20, 2016 (w/ Eng. trans.). |
Official Letter and Search Report from the Taiwan Intellectual Property Office for related Application No. 102139285, 21 pages, dated Jun. 13, 2016 (w/ Eng. trans.). |
Official Letter and Search Report from Taiwan Application No. 103130968, dated Dec. 20, 2016, 16 pages (with English translation). |
Official Letter and Search Report from Taiwan Application No. 103106020, dated Jun. 6, 2017, 7 pages (with English translation). |
Office Action (w/ English translation) for related Chinese Application No. 201380075745.8, 21 pages, dated Jun. 2, 2017. |
Official Action (w/English translation) for related Taiwan application No. 103130968 dated Jun. 7, 2017, 5 pages. |
Affine Transformation—from Wolfram MathWorld, http://mathworld.wolfram.com/AffineTransformation.html, downloaded Feb. 21, 2014, 2 pages. |
First Office Action from Chinese Application No. 201480019324.8, dated Apr. 5, 2017, 20 pages (with English translation). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/063086, 6 pages, dated Mar. 23, 2017. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/014182, 9 pages, dated Mar. 31, 2017. |
Java—Transform a triangle to another triangle—Stack Overflow, http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1114257/transforrn-a-triangle-to-another-triangle?lq=1, downloaded Feb. 21, 2014, 3. |
Office Action (no English translation) for related Chinese Application No. 201480022179.9, 5 pages, dated Mar. 30, 2017. |
Office Action (with English translation) for related Korea Application No. 10-2014-0120247, dated Apr. 14, 2017, 11 pages. |
Chung, “Solution-Processed Flexible Transparent Conductors Composed of Silver Nanowire Networks Embedded in Indium Tin Oxide Nanoparticle Matrices,” Nano Research, 10 pages (Sep. 24, 2012). |
Gardner, “Precision Photolithography on Flexible Substrates,” http://azorescorp.com/downloads/Articles/AZORESFlexSubstrate.pdf (prior to Jan. 30, 2013). |
Grigoriyants et al., “Tekhnologicheskie protsessy lazernoy obrabotki,” Moscow, izdatelstvo MGTU im. N.E. Baumana, p. 334 (2006). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/060470, 7 pages, dated Jan. 16, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2014/017841, 5 pages, dated Jun. 5, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2014/017836, 6 pages, dated Jun. 10, 2014. |
Product Brochure entitled “3-Axis and High Power Scanning” by Cambridge Technology, 4 pages, downloaded Dec. 21, 2013. |
Product Brochure supplement entitled “Theory of Operation” by Cambridge Technology, 2 pages, downloaded Dec. 21, 2013. |
Search Report from the Taiwan Intellectual Property Office for related Application No. 102139285, dated Sep. 1, 2015 (w/ Eng. trans.). |
Website describing 3-Axis Laser Scanning Systems at http://www.camtech.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=131&Itemid=181, 4 pages, accessed Dec. 31, 2014. |
Notice of Preliminary Rejection from the Korean Intellectual Property Office for related Application No. 10-2015-7025813, dated Jun. 26, 2018, 18 pages (with English translation). |
Second Office Action from Chinese Application No. 201380075745.8, dated Feb. 26, 2018, 6 pages (with English translation). |
Third Office Action from Chinese Application No. 201480019324.8, dated Apr. 13, 2018, 8 pages (with English translation). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150376756 A1 | Dec 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61875679 | Sep 2013 | US | |
61818881 | May 2013 | US | |
61767420 | Feb 2013 | US |