Solar cells are widely used to collect solar energy and generate electricity, with multiple solar cells interconnected to form solar panels. There are two main types of solar collectors: silicon and thin-film solar collectors. Silicon is currently the predominant technology, using silicon-based cells encapsulated behind glass. Thin-film processes involve depositing thin-film materials on a substrate to form a light absorbing layer sandwiched between electrical contact layers. The front or top contact is a transparent and conductive layer for current collection and light enhancement, the light absorbing layer is a semiconductor material, and the back contact is a conductive layer to provide electrical current throughout the cell.
In one example of a fabrication process, a metallic back electrical contact layer is deposited on a substrate. A p-type semiconductor layer is then deposited on the back electrical contact layer and an n-type semiconductor layer is deposited on the p-type semiconductor layer to complete a p-n junction. Any suitable semiconductor materials, such as CIGS, CIS, CdTe, CdS, ZnS, ZnO, amorphous silicon, polycrystalline silicon, etc. may be used for these layers. A top transparent electrode layer is then deposited on the p-n junction. This layer may be a conductive oxide or other conductive film and is used for current collection. Once these or other materials have been deposited on the substrate to form a photovoltaic stack, the substrate and thin-film materials deposited may be cut into cells. Multiple cells are then assembled into a thin-film solar panel.
Thin-film solar collectors are lower cost and require lower energy to produce. However, there are numerous sources of defects in a thin-film panel, given the materials used, the large surfaces areas required, the small thicknesses of films, and the sensitivity of the films to small particles. For example, a one micron particle is on the order of the film thickness. Defects from particles and other sources can cause shunts and otherwise compromise solar cell performance.
Provided herein are methods of polishing, cleaning and texturing back contacts of thin-film solar cells. According to various embodiments, the methods involve irradiating sites on the back contact with laser beams to remove contaminants and/or smooth the surface of the back contact. The back contact, e.g., a molybdenum, copper, or niobium thin-film, is smoothed prior to deposition of the absorber and other thin-films of the photovoltaic stack. In certain embodiments, laser polishing of the back contact is used to enhance the diffusion barrier characteristics of the back contact layer, with all or a surface layer of the back contact becoming essentially amorphous. In certain embodiments, the adhesion of the absorber layer is enhanced by the textured back contact and by the presence of the amorphous metal at the deposition surface.
One aspect of the invention relates to a method of polishing a back contact of a thin-film photovoltaic stack. The method involves providing a substrate having a back contact layer for a thin-film photovoltaic stack deposited thereon; and polishing a front surface of the back contact layer by forming surface features in the front surface, wherein forming surface features comprises rastering one or more laser beams over the front surface. The back contact layer may be molybdenum, niobium, copper and silver or any other thin-film capable of making ohmic contact. The substrate may be a metal substrate, e.g., a stainless steel foil.
In certain embodiments, the method involves depositing one or more thin-film layers configured to absorb solar energy on the polished back contact. Examples of absorber layers include CIGS or CIS. In certain embodiments, rastering one or more laser beams over the front surface increases the amorphous character of the back contact layer, and may include improving the diffusion barrier characteristics of the back contact and/or increasing adhesion of the absorber layer to the back contact.
In certain embodiments, the substrate is providing as a web. Polishing a front surface of the back contact layer may involve forming multiple rows of surface features in the front surface, wherein forming a row of surface features comprises rastering one or more laser beams over the front surface in a cross-web direction. The surface features of the row may overlap with the surface features of each adjacent row.
In certain embodiments, the back contact is about 0.5 microns thick. In alternate embodiments, the back contact is between about 1 and 5 microns thick. In certain embodiments, the back contact thickness is at least about 5 microns to allow texturing and polishing depths of this size. According to various embodiments, the substrate may or may not be polished by laser polishing or other techniques prior to deposition of the back contact.
In certain embodiments, the polishing or texturing methods described herein involve irradiating a front surface of the back contact layer with laser energy to heat the surface in localized areas of between 5 to 200 microns and form a plurality of shallow, rapidly expanding melt pools; and after forming the melt pools, cooling the front surface to form a smoothed surface. Irradiating the front surface with laser energy may involve exposing the front surface to laser beams at a rate of about 10-1000 kHz. The smoothed surface may be characterized by a pattern of interconnected surface features, said features having a frequency of 1-200 microns. The interconnected surface features may have an average maximum aspect ratio of no more than 1:1, in certain embodiments, substantially smaller than 1:1, e.g., 0.5:1, etc. Also in certain embodiments, the substrate is oriented at an angle of no more than 10° from vertical during the irradiation.
These and other aspects of the invention are discussed in further detail below with reference to the figures.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and form a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the embodiments of the invention:
Thin-film solar panels have many advantages, including providing low cost, low energy production. However, there are numerous sources of defects in a thin-film panel, given materials used, the large surfaces areas required, the small thicknesses of films, and the sensitivity of the films to small particles. For example, a one micron particle is on the order of the film thickness. Defects from particles and other causes can cause shunts and otherwise compromise solar cell performance.
Another factor related to defects is the level of substrate preparation. For semiconductor device fabrication, substrate (semiconductor wafer) preparation involves chemical-mechanical planarization and cleaning prior to wafers being released into the line. In media production, near sub-single nanometer polish levels are achieved. However, these techniques are highly complex and expensive in comparison to what can reasonably be done as pre-preparation prior to film deposition for a large area solar panel. Any large area, economical method of substrate preparation is likely to leave some level of high-frequency roughness, in comparison to the film thickness. As a result, any robust and high yielding thin-film solar product has a certain number of defects accounted for in the product and process design. Unlike wafer flatness requirements for photolithography, probing and other concerns, and magnetic media for spacing control, there are no significant waviness or flatness requirements for large area photovoltaic panels.
However, defects and particles should be minimized as they can cause shunts between the top and back contacts of a photovoltaic stack. Shunt sites may be present on fabrication or can develop during the lifetime of a solar panel. This development can be related to moisture ingress, collection of ionic contaminants, changes in stress/strain in the film or package or thermal cycling. A new site near a collection line can sink nearly all current generated in a typical cell, and can actually melt the encapsulating material, allowing for additional environmental degradation. The use of serialized cell strings where the voltages are increased across an individual cell place even greater stresses on defect sites and film continuity, the opportunity for field damage to occur in a shaded or poor performing cell. In addition to shunt sites, other problematic results of film defects include low film performance due to poor junction formation and film delamination.
Provided herein are methods of laser polishing, texturing and cleaning thin-film photovoltaic materials. Laser polishing as described herein refers to smoothing a surface of a substrate or back contact layer by exposing one or more localized areas or sites of the surface to laser irradiation, thereby creating a melt pool centered on the site of irradiation, and allowing the melted surface material to re-solidify. In certain embodiments, high frequency surface roughness is removed. In certain embodiments, surface waviness is removed.
Laser texturing as described herein refers to a process of exposing a surface of a substrate or back contact layer to laser irradiation to create a surface pattern having long range order. Long range order refers to a substantially uniform pattern over a surface area of at least tens of square feet. In certain embodiments, laser texturing involves forming an interconnected low frequency patterned surface, the pattern surface frequency being between about 5 and 200 microns. In certain embodiments, the surface is provided having textured features from a rolling or other process. Such a surface may be retextured using laser irradiation. In certain embodiments, a laser textured surface may be characterized by one or more of: overlapping features, a substantially uniform array of features having a center-to-center distance of between about 5 and 200 microns, a substantially uniform array of features having circular symmetry, a substantially uniform array of features having non-circular symmetry, or a substantially uniform array of features having a center-to-center distance less than the natural length scale of the features. Laser texturing may involve rastering a laser beam in a first direction, while moving the surface in a second direction, such that features are formed across a surface at a 100-1000 kHz repetition rate.
Laser cleaning as described herein refers to a process of removing organic or inorganic contamination from a surface of a substrate or back contact. The contamination may be in the form of discrete particles or may be in the form of smeared material.
According to various embodiments, the methods involve removing defects from a material surface by rapidly heating the surface in an area of about 5-200 microns to form shallow (about 10-1000 angstroms deep) and rapidly expanding melt pools, followed by rapid cooling of the surface. The minimization of surface tension causes the surface to re-solidify in a locally smooth surface. That is, high frequency roughness is smoothed out, with a lower frequency bump or texture pattern remaining in certain embodiments after resolidification. Cooling of the surface may be active or passive according to various embodiments.
According to various embodiments, other thin-film layers may be deposited between the electrical contact layers 103 and 107. As an example, electrical contact layers 103 and 107 are separated by a distance of about 1-2 microns. Any ionic contamination and moisture, cutting defects (for non-monolithically integrated cells), conductive contamination, or film delamination can lead to shunting sites, resulting in manufacturing or latent defects. In particular, the presence of any defect in the substrate may cause shunting at the time of deposition, or make the stack susceptible to developing shunts.
While there are various possible sources and causes of shunting and related defects, methods and apparatuses according to various embodiments remove or reduce a significant number of such causes. The photovoltaic thin-film stacks depicted in
In addition to retexturing the surface, the laser polishing process cleans the surface in certain embodiments. This is depicted in
Exposing the surface to a laser beam in accordance with the embodiments described herein may be performed in air, a controlled benign environment such as a noble gas (depending on the reactivity of the surface metal to air), in a reactive gas environment for incorporating elemental compositions into the surface material. In certain embodiments, the compositions or elements are placed on the surface prior to treatment for incorporation into the material during the melt phase. This is discussed further below.
In certain embodiments, a substrate is provided in a web and thin-films are deposited on the substrate in a roll-to-roll process. According to various embodiments, the substrate is laser polished prior to the deposition of any films thereon. An example of a web path that includes laser polishing is described below with respect to
In certain embodiments, the web material is a thin metal foil such as stainless steel, though it may be a thin polymeric material. In many embodiments, the web substrate has a width of between about 2 and 4 feet (in the direction perpendicular to the view), though the laser polishing apparatus may be configured to support substrates of any size, including sizes outside this range.
In certain embodiments, the substrate is relatively low-cost, rolled sheet stock suitable for use as metallic or non-metallic substrates. These include stainless steel, aluminum, titanium, alloys of aluminum or titanium, any metallic foil, or even a metalized non-metallic substrate. Examples of aluminum and titanium alloys include aluminum-silicon alloy and titanium-aluminum alloy, respectively; an example of a metalized non-metallic substrate is a flexible, non-conductive substrate, such as a polymer substrate, with a sputtered metallic layer; and an example of a stainless steel is 430-alloy stainless steel.
Prior to passing into the first deposition chamber 304, the deposition surface of the substrate web is irradiated with one or more laser beams at certain points on the surface at a laser polishing station 302. This causes a melt pool to form at each of these points, evening out surface roughness as well as removing any particles that may be present on the material.
After polishing, the web passes into multiple deposition chambers 304, 306 and 308, which contains one or more magnetrons and targets (not shown) for sputtering one or more thin-films on the web substrate. For example, molybdenum, copper or other back electrical contact material may be sputtered onto the substrate as it continuously moves through the deposition chamber 304. Various guide rollers (not shown) may be used to guide the web substrate through the deposition chamber as well as throughout the apparatus. In certain embodiments, a deposition chamber may include a coating drum (not shown) to support the web substrate while it moves through the deposition chamber. In general, the web is kept in constant tension throughout the machine, with rollers used as necessary to spread the web, provide web steering, provide web tension feedback to servo controllers, and to run the web in desired positions. The web then passes into the next deposition chamber 306 for further thin-film deposition. For example, a p-type CIGS layer may be deposited in this chamber. Next the web is transferred into deposition chamber 308 for deposition of the top layer or layers of the photovoltaic stack. For example, a thin layer of n-type material to form and maintain the p-n junction in coordination with the previous layer may be deposited followed by deposition of a highly conductive and transparent aluminum doped ZnO layer that completes the top electrode.
The deposition apparatus described above is an example of thin-film deposition apparatuses that may be used according to various embodiments. The number of deposition chambers used may range from one to as many as necessary to deposit the thin-film materials. The number, type and thickness of thin-films deposited in each chamber may also be varied depending on system implementation. For example, each film described above with reference to
Still further, the active absorber stack deposited on the back contact layer after any of the methods described herein may include silicon (e.g. for amorphous, micro-crystalline, polycrystalline and tandem silicon cells), copper-indium-gallium-(selenium and/or sulfur), CdSe, CdTe, organic oligomers or polymers, layers of inorganic and organic materials, and whose final form may include micro-particles, nano-particles, or quantum dots.
While
The area of each irradiated site may be between about 5 and 200 microns according to certain embodiments, for example, between about 5 and 100 microns, 5 and 25 microns, 5 and 50 microns, 100 and 200 microns or 150 and 200 microns. In many embodiments, each irradiated site is a single generally circular spot, having a diameter equal to the beam diameter at the surface. The beam area is defined by a lens that directs the beam on the substrate; in certain embodiments, the lens is shaped to direct ellipsoidal or other shaped spots on the substrate.
In certain embodiments, the smoothed surface is characterized by interconnected surface features, with the features having a frequency of between about 1 and 200 microns, according to certain embodiments, for example, between about 5 and 200 microns about 5 and 100 microns, 5 and 25 microns, 5 and 50 microns, 100 and 200 microns or 150 and 200 microns. These interconnected surface features may have a maximum aspect ratio of no more than 1:1.
Pulse duration (full width half max peak power) may range from about 0.10-100 nanoseconds, e.g., 0.1-50 nanoseconds, 0.1-10 nanoseconds, or 1-10 nanoseconds. Peak pulse energy may range from about 1 microjoule to millijoules. Pulse wavelength may range from about 0.4-10 microns. These parameters may depend in part on the material surface being treated, as well as the desired textured surface that results.
In certain embodiments, methods are provided for texturing the surface of a substrate for a thin-film photovoltaic stack. In certain embodiments, methods are provided for texturing the surface of a back contact layer of a thin-film photovoltaic stack.
At 420, a film 402 having a lower frequency roughness (waviness) with length scales (distance between features) of greater than 10 microns. Here, the length scales are greater than the peak to valley roughness, in certain cases at least an order of magnitude greater than the peak to valley roughness. At 403, a film 402 that is “flat” with length scales often exceeding a millimeter, is depicted.
According to various embodiments, the texturing methods described herein modify surfaces having high frequency, high aspect ratio (e.g., 1:1 or above) features, retexturing them so that they exhibit only low frequency or flat features as described above. It should be noted that unlike some technologies in which photolithography, multi-step CMP planarization, fly height control and other functional requirements demand controlled long-wavelength flatness, for thin-film photovoltaics, waviness is tolerable. Only the high aspect ratio surface features are disruptive to the film.
In certain embodiments, overlapping texture patterns are formed by rastering one or more laser beams to irradiate multiple spots across an entire surface or a portion thereof.
According to various embodiments, texturing a surface of a photovoltaic stack or a substrate therefore comprises creating features having aspect ratios, or height to diameter ratios of less than about 1, less than about 0.5, less than about 0.1, less than about 0.05, less than about 0.01, or less than about 0.005.
In certain embodiments, texturing the substrate or back contact surface results in substantially uniform features. These features may have substantially circular symmetry as depicted in
In certain embodiments, the substrate and/or back contact is textured to produce a surface roughness that enhances light trapping. In certain embodiments, peak to peak distance between features to is between about 0.5 microns to about 1 micron, or about 0.5 microns to about 0.9 microns. In certain embodiments, texturing the substrate and/or back contact involves reducing peak height.
In certain embodiments, laser polishing and retexturing techniques as described above are performed on a back contact layer. In certain embodiments, the back contact layer is molybdenum, niobium, chromium, copper, silver, or combinations of these or other suitable material for forming an ohmic contact. In particular embodiments, the back contact layer includes molybdenum. The laser polishing may be performed on the surface of the deposited back-contact, either exclusively or combined with a substrate polish, prior to the deposition of the remaining photovoltaic material set.
According to various embodiments, the thickness of the back contact film is between about 0 and 5 microns, e.g., 1 and 5 microns. In certain embodiments, the back contact film thickness is about 5 microns or greater to allow suitable texturing and polishing depths. In certain embodiments, the back contact is less than 1 micron, e.g., about 0.5 microns. In these cases, the depth of the melt pools may be controlled to be relatively shallow, e.g., 10-100 Angstroms.
Once the back contact film is deposited, laser polishing is performed (907). As described above, laser polishing involves exposing multiple localized areas or sites of the back contact film to a laser beam having an intensity and for an exposure time sufficient to create a melt pool centered on each of the localized sites. According to various embodiments, the back contact is exposed to a laser beam to remove particles and organic material that may be present on the film surface or within the film. Also, according to various embodiments, one or more laser beams is rastered over the surface in a specific pattern to texture the surface as described above with respect to
In certain embodiments, polishing the as-deposited back contact layer alters the microstructure of the back contact layer from having a crystalline structure, or localized areas of crystalline structure, to a substantially amorphous material. In certain embodiments, this involves reducing the thickness of the layer. Also in certain embodiments, polishing the back contact enhances its diffusion barrier characteristics. That is, after polishing, the back contact lowers a diffusion coefficient for the absorber stack constituents, as well as for the constituents of the underlying substrate. In certain embodiments, at least the surface of the back contact is altered to be an amorphous material.
After the back contact film is polished and, in certain embodiments, retextured, an absorber layer is deposited on the back contact layer (909). In certain embodiments, adhesion of the CIGS or other absorber layer is improved by the laser polishing. The adhesion is improved by the presence of textured features and/or the presence of amorphous metal on the surface of the back contact.
Polishing the back contact may result in a superior surface for deposition of an absorber stack than polishing only the underlying substrate. For example, defects introduced during sputtering of the back contact onto a polished or unpolished substrate are eliminated by polishing the substrate.
Another aspect of the invention involves incorporating an element or compound into a substrate or back contact surface during a laser treatment process. In certain embodiments, sodium is incorporated into a photovoltaic stack substrate and/or back contact during a laser polishing, cleaning or retexturing treatment. In particular embodiments, sodium is incorporated into a substrate and/or back contact layer of a CIGS photovoltaic stack. Sodium diffusion has been found to be advantageous during subsequent CIGS growth on the back contact as well as improve conductivity in the CIGS layer.
The sodium coated or treated substrate is then laser treated (1005). Laser treating involves exposing the substrate to radiation from a laser beam at multiple spots across the substrate. This creates a melt pool of the sodium and substrate material at each spot, allowing incorporation of the sodium into the substrate surface. If a sodium-containing compound is used, laser treating dissociates the compound, with the sodium intermixed in the surface layers. The remaining byproducts (e.g., fluorine, chlorine, and the like) are reacted with a controlled reactive gas or getter system. In certain embodiments, operations 1003 and 1005 overlap or are performed simultaneously. For example, in certain embodiments, the substrate is exposed to an overpressure of sodium vapor or a sodium containing compound as it is irradiated. This results in the sodium being intermixed in the surface layers.
The back contact layer, e.g., a molybdenum film, is then deposited on the substrate (1007). An absorber layer, e.g., a CIGS layer, is then deposited on the back contact (1009). The sodium diffuses from the substrate to the back contact, where it may diffuse from to reach the CIGS layer.
In certain embodiments, the methods involve forming a sodium concentration gradient in the substrate material, with the highest concentration at the top or front surface. This is possible due to the laser treatment of the substrate surface. Accordingly, in certain embodiments, the methods require less sodium. According to various embodiments, sodium is incorporated to be between about 0.5% and 5% by weight of the substrate.
The back contact then undergoes laser treatment, to melt the molybdenum or back contact, and in certain cases sodium, thereby incorporating the sodium into the back contact (1107). In certain embodiments, operations 1105 and 1107 overlap or are performed simultaneously. For example, in certain embodiments, the back contact is exposed to an overpressure of a sodium vapor or a vapor of a sodium-containing compound as the back contact is irradiated. An absorber layer, e.g., a CIGS layer, is then deposited on the back contact (1109). The sodium diffuses from the substrate to the back contact, where it may diffuse from to reach the CIGS layer.
According to various embodiments, the sodium may be substantially uniformly incorporated in the back contact layer, or it may be incorporated such that there is a concentration gradient with the highest concentration at the top surface of the back contact layer. Other methods of incorporating sodium into the back contact generally involve the reverse concentration gradient, e.g., by supplying a sodium source such as lime glass at the back side of the metal contact. According to various embodiments, sodium is incorporated to be between about 0.5% and 5% by weight of the back contact layer.
While the above examples refer to incorporation of sodium into the substrate and/or back contact layer, other elements or compounds may be incorporated in addition to or instead of sodium. These compounds may be coated on or otherwise applied as described above. In certain embodiments, a noble or reactive gas is used in conjunction with the laser process to control the final material composition in the solidified substrate or back contact melt. An example of an apparatus to implement this aspect of the invention is described below with reference to
In a particular example, oxygen or an oxygen-containing gas is flowed over the surface being polished to increase oxygen content in the polished film. In another example, a reducing gas is flowed over the surface to reduce the oxygen content. For example, oxygen content may be controlled to control the mobility characteristics of species diffusing through molybdenum.
Provided herein are apparatuses for carrying out the above-described methods. The methods may also be performed with other laser systems.
In the figures, the web 1201 is tensioned between two guide rollers 1204a and 1204b. Unpolished substrate is around roller 1204a, polished substrate around roller 1204b. In certain embodiments, one or both of the guide rollers may not be present, e.g., they may be replaced with a spool. For example, in certain embodiments, unpolished substrate may be taken off a spool, polished and then guided into a deposition apparatus as described above with respect to
A laser source 1203 emits a laser beam that is scanned in a cross-web direction by three galvo system 1206. Individual beams 1214 are emitted from each galvo system 1206. The system, including web, laser source and galvo mirrors are at a slight off-angle (mounting angle 1209) which may in certain embodiments, 1°-20° from vertical, or 5°-15° from vertical to ensure particulates and materials released from the laser process fall away from the film, and do not fall onto the galvo lenses.
In certain embodiments, an air shower 1211 is used together with gravity and an ionization system 1213 to further ensure continued clean operation across the entire web and to ensure the expulsion of released material. The galvo systems 1204 may be spaced about one foot or less away from the web, and include galvo mirrors to raster the beam in a cross-web direction. In certain embodiments in which multiple galvo systems are used, one or more of the galvo systems includes a beam splitter to direct a beam to the next galvo system as well to the web. This allows, according to certain embodiments, a single laser source 1203 to be used with beam splitters in the galvo systems 1206. The rastering process is in the near-vertical direction, while the web 1201 transverses along the length direction. One or more backside heating or cooling elements 1207 is placed near or along the web to control the temperature as needed. According to various embodiments, backside temperature is controlled at a set level between about 0 and 100° C.
Using multiple lasers, or a single laser with split beams, and multiple galvo systems increase system throughput. The laser source may be any of a single, double or quadrupled Nd:YAG or Nd:YLF laser, a carbon dioxide gas laser, and excimer source, or any other laser capable of producing the power (10-1000 W), power density (5-200 micron spot size), controlled pulse duration (0.1-100 ns) and repetition rate (100 kHz-1000 kHz) used for the treatment method. The laser wavelength may range from about 400 nm to 10 microns. The galvo systems accurately support adjacent spot placement tolerances of less than 5 microns, or less than 2 microns, at a repeating frequency of at least about 100 kHz. In alternate embodiments, multiple laser sources are used, or a single laser source and galvo system may be sufficient depending on the web size.
The foregoing descriptions of specific embodiments of the present invention have been presented for purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed, and many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. The embodiments described herein were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application, to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention and various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the claims appended hereto and their equivalents.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/357,277, filed Jan. 21, 2009, which claims benefit of the following: U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/022,232, filed Jan. 18, 2008 and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/022,240, filed Jan. 18, 2008. This application is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/049,159, filed Mar. 14, 2008. Each of these applications is incorporated by reference herein for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2218913 | Hughes et al. | Oct 1940 | A |
3810786 | Lindgren | May 1974 | A |
3952180 | Gnanamuthu | Apr 1976 | A |
4015100 | Gnanamuthu et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
RE29815 | Gnanamuthu | Oct 1978 | E |
4122240 | Banas et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4328390 | Meakin et al. | May 1982 | A |
4639543 | Fang | Jan 1987 | A |
4646479 | Walker et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4731516 | Noguchi et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4789438 | Polan | Dec 1988 | A |
4861407 | Volkmann et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4968383 | Volkmann et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5038950 | Yahagi | Aug 1991 | A |
5142778 | Smolinski et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5232674 | Mukai et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5287622 | Terai | Feb 1994 | A |
5407702 | Smith et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5532520 | Haraguchi | Jul 1996 | A |
5558759 | Pudem | Sep 1996 | A |
5821597 | Nakajima et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5843117 | Alt et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5935307 | Parks | Aug 1999 | A |
6048255 | Kuo et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6113753 | Washburn | Sep 2000 | A |
6143095 | Kim et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6156997 | Yamazaki | Dec 2000 | A |
6205830 | Voges | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6249503 | Aratani | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251002 | Close | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6262962 | Aratani | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269067 | Aratani | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272083 | Aratani | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6356524 | Aratani | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6492615 | Flanagan | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501725 | Aratani | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6504127 | McGregor et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6521862 | Brannon | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6700096 | Yamazaki et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6717105 | Okamoto et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6733931 | Voutsas et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6852012 | Vepa et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6887124 | Pinson et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6908362 | Selvamanickam et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6944195 | Yamazaki et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7053294 | Tuttle et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7081043 | Koh et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7095762 | Yamazaki | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7139633 | Mazumder et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7169286 | Qiao | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7192479 | Mitani et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7207862 | Nabeya et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7504604 | Rossopoulos et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7629234 | Bruland | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7737054 | Yamazaki et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7903336 | Pelsue et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7947575 | Dunne et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8070557 | Kojima et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8212139 | Meyer | Jul 2012 | B2 |
20010010676 | Aratani | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010019532 | Aratani | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010021159 | Aratani | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010021166 | Aratani | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010043545 | Aratani | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020193870 | Jang | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030019853 | Hayen et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030068518 | Ando et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040069751 | Yamazaki et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050038551 | Mazumder et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050074915 | Tuttle et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050081367 | Lauinger et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050252894 | Imai et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060081573 | Wissenbach et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060091546 | Bostanjogio et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060166470 | Tanaka | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070036994 | Andre et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070158315 | Tanaka et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070240325 | Pelsue et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080009093 | Chung et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080196756 | Basol et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080223832 | Song et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080264910 | Kashyap et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080280541 | Chou et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090078313 | Basol et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090183760 | Meyer | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090183763 | Meyer | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090183764 | Meyer | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090229666 | Corneille et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090266399 | Basol et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090305449 | Bollman et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100131108 | Meyer | May 2010 | A1 |
20100212720 | Meyer et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100255630 | Meyer et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100258158 | Meyer et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100258173 | Laia et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100258185 | Meyer et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100258542 | Meyer et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100258982 | Meyer et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100282276 | Kueper et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100282293 | Meyer et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100308441 | Chung et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20120204935 | Meyer et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120234374 | Meyer | Sep 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
54-076446 | Jun 1979 | JP |
59-165470 | Sep 1984 | JP |
04182020 | Jun 1992 | JP |
07188737 | Jul 1995 | JP |
2001-177136 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2002-289888 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2006-005021 | Jan 2006 | JP |
2005050709 | Jun 2005 | WO |
2010120669 | Oct 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Corneille, et al., “Smoothing a Metallic Substrate for a Solar Cell,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/049,159, filed Mar. 14, 2008. |
Laia, et al., “Polishing a Thin Metallic Substrate for a Solar Cell,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/422,620, filed Apr. 13, 2009. |
Meyer, et al., “Laser polishing of a solar cell substrate,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/820,455, filed Jun. 22, 2010. |
Meyer, et al., “Textured substrate for a solar cell,”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/820,522, filed Jun. 22, 2010. |
Meyer, et al., “Sodium-Incorporation In Solar Cell Substrates and Contacts,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/820,560, filed Jun. 22, 2010. |
Kueper, et al, “Removing Defects From Photovoltaic Cell Metallic Substrates With Fixed-Abrasive Filament Roller Brushes,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/842,865, filed Jul. 23, 2010. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Nov. 19, 2010, patent application No. PCT/US2010/030694. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Sep. 23, 2009, patent application No. PCT/US2009/035328. |
Office Action mailed Oct. 5, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/049,159. |
Bereznai et al., “Surface Modifications Induced by Ns and Sub-Ps Excimer Laser Pulses on Titanium Implant Material,” Biomaterials, 2003, vol. 24, pp. 4197-4203. |
Brinksmeier, et al., “Polishing of Structured Molds,” CIRP Annals—Manufacturing Technology, 2004, vol. 53, Issue 1, pp. 247-250. |
Shai et al., “An Approach to Modelling of Laser Polishing of Metals,” Surface & Coatings Technology, 2005, vol. 197, pp. 77-84. |
Final Office Action mailed Apr. 12, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/049,159. |
Office Action mailed Jun. 15, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/422,620. |
Office Action mailed Jan. 31, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/820,455. |
Lowndes et al, “Smooth Polycrystalline Ceramic Substrates with Enhanced Metal Adhesion by Pulsed Excimer Laser Processing,” Applied Physics Letters, 64, 14, 1994, pp. 1791-1793. |
Dobrzanski, et al., “Development of the Laser Method of Multicrystalline Silicon Surface Texturization,” Archives of Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 38, No. 1, 2009, pp. 5-11. |
Dobrzanski, et al., “Laser Texturization in Technology of Mulicrystalline Silicon Solar Cells,” Archives of Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 29, No. 1, 2008, pp. 7-14. |
Dobrzanski, et al., “Surface Texturing of Multicrystalline Silicon Solar Cells,” Archives of Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 31, No. 1, 2008, pp. 77-82. |
Ramos, et al., “Surface Over-Melt During Laser Polishing of Indirect- SLS Metal Parts,” Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, vol. 758, 2002, pp. 53-61. |
Perry et al., “Pulsed Laser Polishing of Micro-Milled Ti6A14V Samples,” Journal of Manufacturing Processes, vol. 11, 2009, pp. 74-81. |
Guo, Wei, Effect of Irradiation Parameters on Morphology of Polishing DF1 (AISI-01) Surface by Nd:YAG Laser, Research Letters in Materials Science, 2007, 5 pages. |
Willenborg et al., “Polishing Metals with Laser Radiation,” Industrial Laser Solutions, 2009, pp. 9-13. |
Office Action mailed Jan. 2, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/820,560. |
Office Action mailed Aug. 22, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/842,865. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100258542 A1 | Oct 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61022232 | Jan 2008 | US | |
61022240 | Jan 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12357277 | Jan 2009 | US |
Child | 12820489 | US | |
Parent | 12049159 | Mar 2008 | US |
Child | 12357277 | US |