The present invention relates to a laser processing machine, in particular to a laser cutting machine.
Known laser processing machines, e.g. for cutting metallic work pieces, comprise a laser cutting head on whose end facing the work piece a nozzle is arranged. In the laser cutting head there are lens that focuses the laser beam. In order to obtain impeccable and uniform cutting results it would be necessary for the focal point of the bundled laser beam to be at a fixed distance from the work piece surface. Laser processing machines are usually used for cutting out or cutting off contours from sheet metal parts. Processing such work pieces takes place via a laser beam, emanating from an opening of the nozzle, directed onto the work piece to be processed, and guided along a predetermined cutting contour by means of a main drive of the machine.
In terms of the quality of work, that is achievable, precise adjustments of the focus position and of the point of impact of the laser beam on the work piece play a decisive role. Thus, to obtain an optimal cutting process with laser cutting machines, the laser beam should be centrically guided through the nozzle of a cutting head, a requirement which is not easy to meet in practical application. Since lateral displacement of the lenses in the cutting head, caused by, e.g., changing the lens or relative sliding one of the lenses may cause relative displacement of the optical axis, so regular checks and centering and focusing steps are necessary.
Conventionally, the nozzle of laser cutting machines is adjusted in such a manner that the nozzle body is centered in X-Y directions relative to the nozzle head and is then fixed. Such a nozzle centering is carried out by means of adjusting screws or other additional adjusting devices in the X axis or Y axis on the cutting head or on lens slide-in units. Adjusting the focus position (focusing) in the Z axis is usually carried out manually by means of an adjusting screw.
In the present description the term “adjustment” refers on the one hand to nozzle centering in the plane of the nozzle aperture (i.e. positioning of the nozzle in the directions of the X-Y axes), and on the other hand to laser focusing, i.e. adjustment of the focus position (in the direction of the Z axis).
EP-1,561,538 (A1) describes a device for adjusting laser beam in a laser processing machine, comprising a work piece receiving unit for receiving and bearing the work piece to be processed, and comprising a laser cutting head. To adjust the laser beam, an alignment unit is provided, which is arranged in the direction of propagation of the laser beam in a test station, wherein the laser cutting head is positioned. The alignment unit comprises a nozzle fixing element, a projection element for acquiring a projection of the laser beam in an image plane, and an evaluation or comparison unit. In order to facilitate adjustment of the laser beam, in addition an image pattern in the form of a target is overlaid on the monitor of the laser beam, which target shows the desired position of the laser beam as a central point. In this arrangement, position corrections of the laser beam also take place manually by way of adjustment screws.
The above-mentioned manual adjustment of the laser beam by means of adjustment screws and additional adjustment devices installed between the nozzle and the cutting head is too cumbersome, requires considerable time and overall is not suitable to provide adequate cutting quality in accordance with modern requirements.
JP-H10-249,566(A) discloses a laser beam machine for machining of work pieces by a laser beam emitted from a laser generator by means of a condensing lens and by emitting the laser beam to a work piece through a nozzle. The luminance of the laser beam axial center is detected by a sensor having a photo-electric conversion element for making a comparison between the luminance data thus detected and a set luminance at the time when the axial center of the laser beam is preliminarily in the center of the nozzle, so that a deviation is detected between the center of the nozzle and the axial center of the irradiating light axis. On the basis of the deviation data, the nozzle is adjusted by means of an actuator to align the center of the nozzle with the axial center of the irradiating light axis.
But, it is to be noted that by means of this luminance detecting of the laser beam center a really precise and reproducible processing of work pieces of higher quality requirements cannot be carried out.
It is the main object of the invention to provide an improved laser processing machine by means of which faster and more reliable and precise checking and adjustment of centering and focusing of a laser beam in the laser processing machine can be carried out, consequently, by means of which the processing quality of the laser machine can be improved.
The above object is solved by an improvement of a laser processing machine according to the invention.
Advantageous versions of solutions according to the invention are also set forth.
The present invention thus relates to a laser processing machine, in particular a laser cutting machine comprising:
Furthermore, according to the invention a special adjusting station is provided in an effective working region of the main drives of the work arm. Said adjusting station comprises a receiving unit for fixing the nozzle and/or a nozzle receiving device for centering the nozzle. In this arrangement, the alignment unit is designed in such a manner that in the laser cutting head a head element, preferably a core piece, is provided which receives the nozzle and/or the nozzle receiving device and which is arranged so as to be relative slidable in the X-Y directions, without any additional adjustment device. After the nozzle centering step performed in the adjusting station, said head element can be fixed, in its adjusted position, in the laser cutting head by means of a releasable clamping unit.
By means of the above measures the cutting head can be designed in a relatively simple and economical manner because it is possible to do away with the additional adjustment devices necessary with the cutting head according to the state of the art. On the other hand, one of the main advantages of the present invention lies in that the necessary adjustments for centering the laser beam being able to be carried out by means of the existing main drives of the machine itself, on the proposed adjusting station of the machine, in a given case by means of a CNC control system.
In a preferred version of the invention the laser cutting head features a split design, in particular comprising an upper head section and a lower head section. In this arrangement the head element, which is arranged so as to be laterally slidable, in the lower head section is designed as a cylindrical core piece that is preferably connected to the coaxial nozzle receiving device. Preferably, the lower head section comprises an exterior housing that is attached to the work arm by means of the upper head section. In other words, in the above version the exterior housing is adjusted by the main drives of the machine to the predetermined extent for centering the laser beam; but during this step the core piece with the cutting nozzle is fixed at the adjusting station.
According to a further feature of the invention the releasable clamping device can comprises an annular piston which is arranged in an axial annular space of the laser cutting head, preferably of the housing, and is movable from a basic position, which affixes the laterally slidable head element, to a second position which undoes the fixation of the laterally slidable head element, and back. The annular piston can, for example, be operated pneumatically in the sense of releasing the clamping. If applicable, the annular piston can be in cooperation on the one hand by means of clamping surfaces of the laterally slidable head element, and on the other hand by means of a clamping unit that acts in the sense of a fixation.
In a preferred version the clamping unit of the undoable clamping device comprises at least one spring unit, preferably comprising at least three axial spring assemblies.
Thus the invention does not need any additional adjusting devices, e.g. servo motors or similar (as is the case in the state of the art), on the cutting head or on the centering support of the laser cutting machine. The actual function of the nozzle centering device is to correctly align the laser beam in the aperture of the nozzle, which is carried out according to the invention in such a manner that in the released state of the clamping device the remaining cutting head part is displaced relative to the nozzle in lateral directions (X-Y) exclusively by means of the existing main drives of the machine. In this way semi-automatic or fully automatic nozzle centering can be implemented in a simple manner and without any considerable additional expenditure. This adjustment according to the invention has been constructed in such a manner that the movable part of the head section is fixed in the cutting head during the normal cutting operation of the machine.
Beside the cutting region on the machine, but still in the effective operation region of the main drives, there is arranged the proposed centering support of the adjusting station, which support serves as a receiving device and affixation device for the nozzle receiving device during the centering step of the nozzle.
The invention is explained below in more detail with reference to the enclosed drawings that illustrate a preferred exemplary version of the laser processing machine according to the invention, in which:
The work arm 1 comprises, in the present version, known main laser head drives (not shown) with a central control system, preferably a CNC control system, which main drives are suitable for moving the work arm 1 together with the laser cutting head 2 according to the coordinates specified in each case (in the directions of the X-Y-Z axes) for processing a work piece W that has been affixed to the work table (e.g. in a manner described in EP-0680805B1, having counterpart U.S. Pat. No. 5,667,707A which is incorporated by reference, into the present disclosure).
However, the lower head section 5 has a special design according to the invention. Said lower head section 5 has a laterally displaceable head element and comprises an exterior housing 5A that is disconnectably connected to the upper head section 4, as well as a core piece 5B of annular design, which core piece 5B can be laterally displaced relative to the housing 5A for centering a nozzle D of the laser cutting head 2, and can be fixed after adjustment.
So in this version, the core piece 5B forms the laterally displaceable head element mentioned in the introduction. In a central aperture 6 of the core piece 5B a cylindrical nozzle receiving device 7 is arranged which at its lower end comprises a thread connection 36 with the coaxial nozzle D (
In the lower head section 5, i.e. between the housing 5A and the core piece 5B, there is a cylindrical interior space 8 for the lateral relative adjustment of the core piece 5B (see
Thus, according to the invention the mutual radial/lateral position of the core piece 5B can be adjusted together with the nozzle receiving device 7 and the nozzle D (in X-Y directions) relative to the housing 5A for centering the nozzle D, which guides a laser beam 11 through the laser cutting head 2, but without additional adjustment devices between the nozzle D and the work arm 1 (as is the case in the state of the art).
A mirror (not shown) in the upper head section 4 is designed to reflect the laser beam 11 along an axis A-A, which laser beam 11 in a centered desired position comes in along the centre of the laser cutting head 2 and extends coaxially to a geometrical axis (designated by 35) of the nozzle D (see
On the one hand, to fix the core piece 5B—together with the nozzle receiving device 7 and the nozzle D—in its centered position, and on the other hand to release this affixation for a new centering/adjustment, according to the invention a special releasable clamping device 12 is provided. In the exemplary version, this clamping device 12 is arranged between the housing 5A and the core piece 5B and in this way it makes possible a relative X-Y displacement of the core piece 5B with the nozzle receiving device 7 and the nozzle D in the lower head section 5. However, this clamping device 12 is constructed in such a manner that the core piece 5B with the nozzle receiving device 7 and the nozzle D are fixed in the cutting head 2 during the normal cutting operation of the machine LM. This will be explained in more detail below with reference to
In
In
In this version, a pneumatic working space 19 is provided in the annular space 15 underneath the annular piston 16. In this case, the annular piston 16 comprises a radial exterior flange 20 and a radial interior flange 21. A lower clamping surface 22 of the interior flange 21 is seated on an upper clamping surface 23 of a radial exterior flange 24 of the core piece 5B in the shown affixing home/basic position (see
This co-operation between the clamping unit 25 and the annular piston 16 consists of the lowermost spring element of the spring assemblies 26 (see
If the annular piston 16 is subjected to a pressure medium—in this case to compressed air—through holes 28 and the working space 19, the annular piston 16 moves upwards in axial direction against the spring force of the spring assemblies 26 of the elastic clamping unit 25. In this way the clamping effect of the clamping unit 25 is thus determined.
In this state, the mutual position of the core piece 5B, together with the nozzle receiving device 7 and the nozzle D, as well as of the housing 5A in the lower head section 5 (and also the position to the work arm 1, see
After blocking the flow of compressed air to the working space 19 the spring assemblies 26 press the annular piston 16 downwards again into its home position, in which the core piece 5B, together with the nozzle receiving device 7 and the nozzle D, is jammed or fixed again in its centered position by the clamping surfaces 22 and 23. In other words, this mechanism is constructed in such a manner that the movable part of the construction, i.e. in this version the core piece 5B of the lower head section 5, during normal cutting operation of the machine LM is fixed at all times.
In a given case, according to the invention it is also possible to have such an inverse arrangement in which the laterally movable head element is formed by the housing 5A.
Turning our attention once more to
The receiving unit 31 is thus used as an adjusting unit and comprises a center hole 32 into which in the present case three rollers 33 partly reach in order to center and fix the inserted nozzle receiving device 7 in the adjusting station 3. The three centering rollers 33 are arranged circumferentially along the hole 32, preferably so as to be offset by 120° relative to each other.
In
The method of operation of the machine LM according to the invention according to
If the nozzle D is to be adjusted or centered, the laser cutting head 2 is moved, by means of normal adjustment of the work arm 1, to the determined position of the centering support 29 in the adjusting station 3. After this step, the clamping of the core piece 5B, together with the nozzle receiving device 7 and the nozzle D, is released. This means that the annular piston 16 of the clamping device 12 is subjected to compressed air through the holes 28, and then the annular piston 16 moves upwards in axial direction against the spring force of the elastic clamping unit 25. In this way the clamping effect of the clamping unit 25 is thus released.
Thereafter the lower head section 5 can be moved downwards in the direction of the Z axis, wherein the movable core piece 5B of the lower head section 5 of the laser cutting head 2—together with the nozzle receiving device 7 and the nozzle D—in its released state is vertically moved to the nozzle receiving unit 31 of the centering support 29 of the adjusting station 3, where it is received and fixed.
Any checking or adjusting the laser beam 11 can then most easily be carried out in such a manner that from below some plastic tape (not shown) is stuck onto the underside of the nozzle D so that the briefly switched-on laser beam 11 can penetrate it and forms a hole in it. The actual position of this hole thus formed in the plastic tape is in the simplest case visually confirmed by the operator. Thereafter the optical position of the laser beam 11 is determined manually or automatically.
In another exemplary version of the invention the image of the hole is acquired by means of a camera module directed onto the stuck-on plastic tape (in a manner similar to that in EP-1,561,538) and is transferred as an image signal to a monitor (not shown) of the machine LM. The actual position of the hole (and indirectly also of the laser beam) is shown on the monitor preferably by means of a target.
If applicable, the hole image of the laser beam 11 can be subjected to an image analysis and can be immediately evaluated in a computer-controlled manner or manually, and thereafter corresponding corrections of positioning are carried out. However, according to the invention, the determined offset of the optical position of the laser beam 11 is correspondingly corrected by means of the present main axes drives X and Y of the machine LM, or by means of the CNC control system. In this way the centering process of the laser beam 11 is completed.
Since by means of this centering method the nozzle receiving device 7, together with the nozzle D and the core piece 5B, is fixed in the centering support 29 of the adjusting station 3, the housing 5A of the lower head section 5 can be correctly aligned/adjusted relative to the centre and to the geometrical axis 35 of the nozzle D by means of the main axes drives of the machine LM in the direction of the X-Y axes.
Subsequently the core piece 5B, together with the set centered position of the nozzle receiving device 7 and of the nozzle D, is clamped again by activating the clamping device 12. After this step the entire laser cutting head 2 can be moved by the work arm 1, from the adjusting station 3 in the direction of the Z axis by means of the main drive. Thereafter the nozzle D is, and remains, reliably fixed in the adjusted and centered state.
For this purpose, in a manner similar to that mentioned above, the nozzle D is locked in the receiving unit 31 of the adjusting station 3, and adjustment itself is accomplished by laterally sliding the remaining cutting head relative to the nozzle D, wherein for this purpose, however, it is necessary to release first the clamping device 12.
In the version shown in
As shown in
Before the camera system 37 can be used, a calibration should be carried out:
Subsequently the adjustment method is carried out as follows on the laser cutting machine LM according to the invention, as shown in
In a further version, the focal position can be determined. To this effect with various focal positions holes are made in the target, which after each “firing” is displaced by one working position. The camera evaluates the holes size. In the smallest hole the focus was in the target.
The invention thus makes it possible to achieve a semi-automatic or fully automatic centering of the nozzle, for which, however, no additional servo-motors or other adjusting devices are necessary between the nozzle head and the work arm, as is the case in the state of the art. By the invention the adjustment and construction of the laser cutting machine is significantly facilitated. The solution according to the invention makes it possible, without much effort, to reliably detect any deviation of the position of the laser beam from the desired/predetermined value, and to carry out suitable, simple, fast and reproducible correction for centering.
It should be emphasized that, within the scope of protection according to the enclosed claims, further embodiments of the laser processing machine according to the invention may be carried out, for which, knowing the present disclosure of the invention, a person having ordinary skill in the art would not, however, require any further technical teaching.
For example, in the releasable clamping device 12 the annular piston 16 could also be operated hydraulically or electro-magnetically. The spring assemblies 26 could, if applicable, be replaced by a coil spring or other spring elements, e.g. pneumatic spring units. In a further embodiment option, the nozzle receiving device 7 and the core piece 5B could be designed as an integrated, preferably single-part element. In this way the construction of the cutting head 5 could be further simplified.
The single annular piston 16 (of the versions shown) could, if applicable, be replaced by piston elements or piston segments that are arranged so as to be offset along the annular gap. Furthermore, such a design is also possible in which the machine LM comprises two or more laser cutting heads 2 (not illustrated).
Of course, it is also feasible for a laser cutting machine to be provided without a work table. This can apply, for example, to mobile laser cutting machines and oversize work pieces where the laser cutting machine is moved towards the work piece, wherein the work piece is affixed elsewhere, or wherein as a result of its size and weight does not require any affixation at all.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10170451 | Jul 2010 | EP | regional |
This application is a 35 U.S.C. 371 national-phase entry of PCT International application no. PCT/IB2011/053257 filed on Jul. 21, 2011 and also claims benefit of priority to European application no. EP10170451 filed on Jul. 22, 2010, and also claims benefit of priority as a non-provisional of U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 61/374,665 filed on Aug. 18, 2010, and parent application PCT/IB2011/053257, European application no. EP10170451 and U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 61/374,665 are all incorporated herein by reference in their respective entireties, as to all their parts, for all intents and purposes, as if identically set forth in full herein.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2011/053257 | 7/21/2011 | WO | 00 | 1/22/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/011072 | 1/26/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3423593 | Chinnock | Jan 1969 | A |
3590840 | Hyer | Jul 1971 | A |
3692414 | Hosterman et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
3736402 | Mefferd et al. | May 1973 | A |
3843865 | Nath | Oct 1974 | A |
4335296 | Bredow | Jun 1982 | A |
4406940 | Tsutsumi | Sep 1983 | A |
4427873 | Orita et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4634832 | Martyr | Jan 1987 | A |
4644128 | Palentyn et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4668088 | Quinque et al. | May 1987 | A |
4675501 | Klingel | Jun 1987 | A |
4698480 | Klingel | Oct 1987 | A |
4728771 | Sartorio | Mar 1988 | A |
4772772 | Juptner et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4806726 | Rosa et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4940880 | Klingel et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4950861 | Erlenmaier et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5008510 | Koseki | Apr 1991 | A |
5039836 | Lemelson | Aug 1991 | A |
5045668 | Neiheisel et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5132510 | Klingel et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5272312 | Jurca | Dec 1993 | A |
5304773 | Kilian et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5371336 | Albert et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5373135 | Beyer et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5463202 | Kurosawa et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5463215 | Alfille | Oct 1995 | A |
5491318 | Sugawara et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5525776 | Okamoto | Jun 1996 | A |
5548098 | Sugawara et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5667707 | Klingel et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5685999 | Wiedemann et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5698120 | Kurosawa et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5751436 | Kwon et al. | May 1998 | A |
5886319 | Preston et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5915316 | Tajima et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5968382 | Matsumoto et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5969335 | Karasaki | Oct 1999 | A |
5998768 | Hunter et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6031200 | Whitehouse | Feb 2000 | A |
6040549 | Kanaoka | Mar 2000 | A |
6044308 | Huissoon | Mar 2000 | A |
6124565 | Morishita et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6188041 | Kim et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6204473 | Legge | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6260976 | Endou et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6284999 | Virtanen et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6288363 | Kaga et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6300592 | Ulrich et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6316743 | Nagahori et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6326586 | Heyerick et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6376798 | Remue et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6392192 | Cole et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6393687 | Friedrich | May 2002 | B1 |
6417487 | Nagura et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6419146 | Buldhaupt et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6455807 | Scott | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6462301 | Scott et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6528762 | Mayer | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6588738 | Sukuvaara et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6649866 | Reichmann et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6670574 | Bates et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6693256 | Furujo et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6777641 | Cole et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6777646 | Schubert | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6822187 | Hermann et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6833911 | Lizotte | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6886284 | Lizotte | May 2005 | B2 |
6934014 | Kleinhuber | Aug 2005 | B1 |
7005606 | Legge et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7038166 | Denney et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7060932 | Denney et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7124420 | Murata et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7180920 | Denney et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7286223 | Denney et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7289206 | Denney et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7345257 | Yamazaki et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7379483 | Denney et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7407861 | Couch et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7492453 | Denney et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7505504 | Sakai et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7528344 | Horn et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7570443 | Blasenheim et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7620085 | Denney et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7667159 | Pailthorp et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7848552 | Schutze et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7864315 | Denney et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8049132 | Bouet et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7880114 | Denney et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7880877 | Denney et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8040619 | Blasenheim et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8094303 | Denney et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
RE43400 | O'Brien et al. | May 2012 | E |
RE43487 | O'Brien et al. | Jun 2012 | E |
8198566 | Baird | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8217301 | Schmauder et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8228501 | Denney et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
RE43605 | O'Brien et al. | Aug 2012 | E |
8258425 | Denney et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8306079 | Denney et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8314361 | Harnisch et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8338743 | Wanner et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8383980 | Yamazaki et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8439811 | Erlenmaier et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8519299 | Schmauder et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8624158 | Denney et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8638509 | Blasenheim et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8710398 | Boynton et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
20020177288 | Brown et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030006221 | Hong et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014895 | Lizotte | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030183608 | Yamazaki et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030192865 | Cole et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204283 | Picard et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030234242 | McCoy | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030234243 | McCoy | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030234244 | McCoy | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040027630 | Lizotte | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040029362 | Liu | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040182839 | Denney et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040182840 | Denney et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040182841 | Denney et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040182842 | Denney et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040182998 | Denney et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040182999 | Denney et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040208212 | Denney et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050017156 | Ehrmann et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050040150 | Denney et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050051523 | Legge et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050062583 | Naumov et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050098547 | Cali et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050109738 | Hewett et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050167403 | Petring | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050213881 | Leclerc et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060049158 | Schurmann et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060144834 | Denney et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070075050 | Heyl | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070075060 | Shedlov et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070088409 | Bischoff et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070119829 | Vietz et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070193987 | Bischoff et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070193988 | De Joannis De Verclos et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070228025 | Horn et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070284345 | Ando et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080000888 | Schulz et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080031298 | Sakai et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080067331 | Denney et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080212623 | Bischoff et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090001063 | Weick et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090021731 | Denney et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090057283 | Schmauder et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090152249 | Petro et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090181838 | Schmauder | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090240368 | Young, Jr. et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090284739 | Denney et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100044353 | Olsen | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100071220 | Thompson et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100134628 | Pfitzner et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100176103 | Schulz et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100188669 | Rushford | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110102789 | Denney et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110210107 | Hammann et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110266262 | Denney et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110287607 | Osako et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120145687 | Wolfel | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120228274 | Schmauder et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130068738 | Schurmann et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130126489 | Buschulte | May 2013 | A1 |
20130134141 | Santner et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130146569 | Woods et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130184839 | Bauer et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130319980 | Hesse et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140034614 | Sbetti et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20150069028 | Jennings et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
201220326 | Apr 2009 | CN |
102117053 | Jul 2011 | CN |
102855326 | Jan 2013 | CN |
8710866 | Dec 1988 | DE |
4201640 | Feb 1993 | DE |
10150129 | Apr 2003 | DE |
102007013623 | Oct 2008 | DE |
102007048471 | Apr 2009 | DE |
102008052592 | Apr 2010 | DE |
102009044751 | Jun 2010 | DE |
0597771 | May 1994 | EP |
0680805 | Jan 2001 | EP |
0991493 | Jul 2004 | EP |
1561538 | Aug 2005 | EP |
1600248 | Nov 2005 | EP |
1634673 | Mar 2006 | EP |
1693141 | Aug 2006 | EP |
1693141 | Jul 2008 | EP |
1967316 | Sep 2008 | EP |
1600248 | Oct 2008 | EP |
2169491 | Mar 2010 | EP |
2243557 | Oct 2010 | EP |
1574485 | Mar 2013 | EP |
S56-041092 | Apr 1981 | JP |
H03-027889 | Feb 1991 | JP |
H07-144289 | Jun 1995 | JP |
H09-076084 | Mar 1997 | JP |
H10-249566 | Sep 1998 | JP |
H11-077356 | Mar 1999 | JP |
2009-129513 | Jun 2009 | JP |
100699247 | Mar 2007 | KR |
9707928 | Mar 1997 | WO |
02080081 | Oct 2002 | WO |
02100587 | Dec 2002 | WO |
03002289 | Jan 2003 | WO |
2004087362 | Oct 2004 | WO |
2006031577 | Mar 2006 | WO |
2006138605 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2008052591 | May 2008 | WO |
2009007708 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2009014307 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2009157034 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2011035888 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2011051567 | May 2011 | WO |
2011083087 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2011083205 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2012000995 | Jan 2012 | WO |
2012080883 | Jun 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Dec. 5, 2011, from parent PCT/IB2011/053257; in English. |
EPO Search Report, from priority appl.No. EP10170451 of the present application; dated Jan. 5, 2011; in German. |
U.S.Supreme Court petition for writ of certiorari filed on Dec. 3, 2015 in Media Rights Technologies, Inc. v. Capital One Bank (U.S. Supreme Court Case No. 15-725). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130112671 A1 | May 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61374665 | Aug 2010 | US |