The present invention relates to laser processing machines, to laser processing nozzles for processing metal sheets and to methods of laser processing metal sheets.
During laser processing of workpieces, in particular laser cutting of metal sheets, a processing gas or a cutting gas can be supplied to a processing location by a laser processing nozzle. In such laser processing, the cutting gas can facilitate the cutting operation by forming a pressure cushion above the processing location which causes the molten mass and slag produced during the cutting operation to be discharged out of the cutting seam during cutting.
Generally, laser processing nozzles that are used have a supply chamber with a conical inner contour for the laser beam and a processing gas. In such nozzles, the conical inner contour of the supply chamber merges into a cylindrical mouth region such that the diameter of the mouth region corresponds to the diameter of the inner contour of the supply chamber at the side facing the mouth region. Different nozzle diameters can be used for different sheet metal thicknesses. Typically, a larger nozzle diameter is used when processing thicker metal sheets. Generally, using a greater nozzle diameter provides a higher mass flow which can be necessary to process thick metal sheets because more material has to be discharged from the cutting seam.
If the material is simply melted and not burnt (so-called “melt cutting”) during the processing operation, the gas pressure in the pressure chamber of the cutting head must typically have a minimum level of pressure so that the pressure cushion's pressure at the processing location is high enough to reliably discharge the molten mass. In the case of large nozzle diameters, gas pressures greater than 15 bar (e.g., ranging from 15-25 bar) can be required.
In addition to the above-described standard nozzle, a large number of nozzles are known for special purposes. For example, De Laval nozzles for laser-supported thermal cutting or nozzles for cutting silicon blocks which have a conical opening region at the side facing the workpiece as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,423,928.
WO 2007/059787 discloses a nozzle having an inner cone as a supply region, a cylindrical mouth region, and a cavity which adjoins the mouth region that is directed towards the workpiece and has an edge for producing a swirling flow. The nozzle described therein is typically suitable for cutting steel sheets (e.g., high-grade steel sheets) having a thickness greater than 8 mm. During operation, a pressure cushion is produced in the cavity which stabilizes the central cutting gas beam. Consequently, this results in the cutting gas beam better adjoining the melt front and the molten mass of the workpiece, thereby the molten mass being discharged more continuously. The improved molten mass discharge characteristics can become apparent by observing a substantially reduced roughness of the cutting edges.
However, it has been found that the advantages of that nozzle can be typically only utilized if the laser processing is conducted with a small distance between the nozzle and the metal sheet (e.g., at distances between 0.3 mm-0.5 mm). If the distance between the nozzle and the metal sheet becomes too large, the pressure cushion can become too small to obtain the desired gas dynamics effect and the molten mass cannot be discharged.
The metal laser processing nozzle is generally electrically insulated from the remainder of the laser processing machine and from the workpiece which is typically a metal sheet. Typically, the metal laser processing nozzle is fixed to the laser processing machine by a dielectric material (e.g., a ceramic material). The capacitance of the system (e.g., capacitance between the laser processing nozzle and the metal sheet workpiece) can be measured using a sensor of a distance control to determine the distance between the laser processing nozzle and the metal sheet workpiece. Capacitance between two objects generally has an inverse relationship to the distance between the two objects. Thus, during measurement, an increase in the capacitance measured between the laser processing nozzle and the metal sheet workpiece can indicate that the distance between the two components has decreased proportionally. However, at small distances (e.g., less than 0.4 mm), the known distance control method discussed above tends to perform inaccurately with the known laser processing nozzles. In some cases, the sensor of the distance control has been shown to produce incorrect distance measurement values, falsely providing readings that indicate a collision between the laser processing nozzle and the workpiece. In addition, the distance measurements at the small distances (e.g., less than 0.4 mm) can be influenced more sensitively than distance measurements at larger distances (e.g., more than 1.0 mm). For example, if a slight disruption of the electromagnetic field (e.g., related to gas plasma) occurs, an immediate change in the distance measurements can result. As a result, the fluid dynamics of the gases used in the process can be substantially disrupted, the discharge of molten mass can deteriorate, and an interruption of the cut or a collision report may result. Therefore, a low level of susceptibility to disruption of the laser processing nozzle is desired in the short ranges (e.g., less than 0.4 mm).
In one aspect of the invention a laser processing nozzle includes a step which is formed between a supply chamber and a mouth region for swirling the processing gas, and an opening region which adjoins the mouth region along the nozzle longitudinal axis and which widens relative to the mouth region for the discharge of the processing gas.
In some embodiments, the step between the supply chamber and the mouth region of the laser processing nozzle produces occurrences of turbulence within the nozzle. These occurrences of turbulence can act as pressure cushions and can attenuate small changes in pressure that occur when the nozzle distance (i.e., the distance between the nozzle and the workpiece) changes. In such embodiments, the laser processing nozzle for processing metal sheets can typically be used in an operationally reliable manner with small distances between the laser processing nozzle and the metal sheet (e.g., less than 0.8 mm or 0.5 mm). In this instance, the supply chamber, the mouth region, and the opening region are typically arranged so as to be radially symmetrical and coaxial relative to the nozzle longitudinal axis.
In some embodiments, the step between the supply chamber and the mouth region can extend along a plane that is perpendicular to the nozzle longitudinal axis. However, in other embodiments, it is also possible for the step to extend along a plane that is not perpendicular (e.g., between 80° and 100°) to the longitudinal axis.
In some embodiments, the step can be a planar face (e.g., a flat surface). However, in other embodiments, the step can alternatively be a non-planar face (e.g., the face may have curvature). In some cases, the outer edge of the step can merge into the outer surface of the supply chamber at a rounded corner. A significant aspect of the laser processing nozzle is that a discontinuity in the inner contour of the laser processing nozzle is produced by the step and causes turbulence in the processing gas.
In some embodiments, the cross-sectional surface area of the step is at least four times as large as the cross-sectional surface area of the mouth region. The cross-sectional surface area of the step is defined in this case as the surface area which the step covers (including the mouth region) in a plane perpendicular to the nozzle longitudinal axis. Experiments have shown that the cross-sectional area of the step should be relatively large in comparison with the cross-sectional area of the mouth region. In some embodiments, the cross-sectional area of the step is more than four times as large or in some cases more than eight times as large as the cross-sectional area of the mouth region. If a nozzle has radially symmetrical inner contours (e.g., when the supply chamber defining the outer edge of the step and the mouth region are substantially concentric cylinders), the outer diameter of the step should typically be at least twice as large as the diameter of the cylindrical mouth region and generally not be greater than four times that diameter.
In some embodiments, a first non-cylindrical (e.g., conical) portion of the opening region directly adjoining the mouth region has a first opening angle that is between 20° and 80° (e.g., between 25° and 35°). Experiments have shown that in the portion of the opening region directly adjoining the mouth region, the nozzle contour should open at an angle greater than the angle used in De Laval nozzles having comparable dimensions. However, the opening angle in such nozzles is typically no more than 10°. In such embodiments, the laser processing nozzle can be produced particularly simply if the nozzle contour has at least one conical portion.
In some embodiments, a second non-cylindrical (e.g., conical), portion adjoins the first portion and has a second, larger opening angle which is between 100° and 160° (e.g., between 135° and 145°). The flow relationships desired at the processing side can be reproduced as a close approximation by two such non-cylindrical portions, which are in some cases conical.
In some embodiments, more than two conical portions, whose opening angles become increasingly large as the distance from the mouth region increases, can also be formed in the opening region. In such embodiments, the opening angles can increase from portion to portion more gradually than in nozzles having only two conical portions in the opening region.
It has been found advantageous to form a rounded portion between the first portion and the second portion and any other portions in order to obtain a continuous transition between the portions and thereby to counteract the formation of turbulence in the gas flow being discharged. However, in some cases, a cylindrical region which has a small length in the nozzle longitudinal direction and in which the last conical portion may not merge in a continuous manner (i.e., without a rounded edge) can adjoin the conical regions in the region of the discharge opening of the laser processing nozzle.
In some embodiments, the opening angle of the inner contour of the opening region increases continuously as the distance from the mouth region increases. As described above, the increase of the opening angle may occur along two or more conical portions. If the number of conical portions is very large, a predetermined function for the radius of the inner contour of the opening region can be approximated based on the conical portions. In some cases, the radius of the inner contour may also be adapted directly to a preferably continuous mathematical function which increases smoothly.
In some embodiments, the diameter of the discharge opening of the laser processing nozzle formed at the opening region is at least twice as large as the length of the opening region along the nozzle longitudinal axis. The selection of a discharge opening with a relatively large diameter in comparison with the length of the opening region was found in experiments to be particularly advantageous for the discharge of the processing gas.
In some embodiments, the supply chamber and the mouth region are arranged coaxially relative to the nozzle longitudinal axis and are, in some cases, constructed to be cylindrical. If both the supply chamber and the mouth region are cylindrical, the step forms the base face of the cylindrical supply chamber, which the outer surface of the cylindrical mouth region adjoins. However, the mouth region is typically cylindrical, whereas the supply chamber may be constructed to be cylindrical or of another form (e.g., rectangular or square).
In some embodiments, the step formed on the supply chamber may not extend perpendicularly to the nozzle axis but instead may be a conical face. In such cases, the angle between the longitudinal axis of the nozzle and the conical step face can be between approximately 80° and 100°. A curved step is also possible if it is ensured that occurrences of turbulence in the processing gas are produced at the step.
Other advantages of the invention will be appreciated from the description and the drawings. The above-mentioned features and those set out below can also be used individually or together in any combination. The embodiments shown and described are not intended to be understood to be a conclusive listing, but instead are of exemplary character for describing the invention.
a is a cross-sectional schematic illustration of a laser processing head having a lens.
b is a cross-sectional schematic illustration of a laser processing head having two mirrors.
The laser beam 6 produced by the laser resonator 2 is guided via a beam guide 3, (e.g., by a redirecting mirror 3a) and shaped in accordance with the processing task. The beam guide 3 is typically completely shielded during operation of the laser cutting machine 1, for safety reasons and in order to prevent contamination.
The closure of the beam guide 3 is formed by the laser processing head 4, in which the laser beam 6 is focused on a processing location 7 and is orientated perpendicularly relative to the surface 8a of a workpiece 8, in order to melt the material of the workpiece 8. In some cases, the workpiece 8 can be a high-grade steel sheet having a thickness greater than 8 mm.
During laser processing, the workpiece 8 is cut with the laser beam 6, that is, the workpiece 8 is melted or oxidized in a point-like manner at a location and the molten mass produced at the location is discharged, leaving a hole in the workpiece 8. The laser beam 6 is subsequently moved relative to the workpiece 8 so that a continuous cutting aperture 9 is produced, along which the laser beam 6 separates the workpiece 8.
Both the piercing and the laser cutting can be facilitated by using a processing gas added in the laser cutting head 4. Processing gases (or cutting gases) 10 which may be used include oxygen, nitrogen, compressed air and/or other application-specific gases which facilitate the cutting operation by forming a pressure cushion above the processing zone to discharge the molten mass from the cutting seam. Additionally, the cutting gas 10 can improve the chemistry of the laser cutting by supporting combustion. Selection of the cutting gas used can depend on the materials to be cut and the cutting quality requirements of the workpiece. Particles and gases produced during cutting can be discharged from a discharge chamber 12 by a discharge device 11. A central control unit 13 serves to automatically control the processing operations of the laser cutting machine 1. In some cases, the central control unit 13 is configured to automatically position the laser cutting head 4 at the processing location 7 and to adjust the beam parameters of the laser beam 6 (e.g., laser power) and the processing parameters at the machine (e.g., gas type, gas pressure, nozzle distance, etc.).
a shows one configuration of the laser cutting head 4 of
b shows another configuration of the laser cutting head 4 of
The first housing portion 14a is flushed with a clean gas at a slight excess pressure; the second housing portion 14b does not have any gas flushing. In order to be able to laser-cut with the mirror cutting head 4b, a pressure increase of the cutting gas 10 is generated by an annular gap nozzle 17b which is illustrated in detail in
Both the laser processing nozzle 17a of the lens cutting head 4a and the laser processing nozzle 17b of the mirror cutting head 4b are typically electrically insulated relative to the laser processing machine 1 and the workpiece 8. Such insulation can be achieved by using a dielectric in the form of a ceramic material. As discussed above, the capacitance of the system (e.g., capacitance between the laser processing nozzle and the metal sheet workpiece) can be determined based on a distance between the processing nozzle and the workpiece, as measured by a sensor of a distance control (not shown). The laser cutting machine 1 is generally able to obtain a precise distance measurement during a laser cutting operation. Laser processing nozzles 17a-d which are also suitable for laser cutting the workpiece 8 in an operationally reliable manner with relatively short distances (e.g., less than 0.8 mm) between the laser processing nozzle and the workpiece are described below with reference to
At the side facing away from the supply chamber 24, the cylindrical mouth region 25 is adjoined along the nozzle longitudinal axis 23 by an opening region 28 which widens radially relative to the mouth region and which comprises a single conical portion 28a having an opening angle α of approximately 75°. At the side of the opening region 28 opposite the mouth region 25, there is formed a discharge opening 30 of the laser processing nozzle 17a whose diameter d3 substantially corresponds to the diameter of the cylindrical supply chamber 24. The length L of the opening region 28 is approximately 3 mm. In some cases, the diameter d3 of the discharge opening 30 which can be approximately 8 mm is more than twice as large as the length L. The radially widening inner contour 28a of the opening region 28 defines a flow profile to produce flow relationships at the processing location known to be advantageous.
Generally, the laser processing nozzles 17a-d shown in
While certain embodiments have been described, other embodiments are possible.
Although the step 26 in
Although the laser processing nozzle 17b shown in
In the above-described cases, the laser processing nozzle 17a-d can be used for cutting high-grade steel sheets having a thickness of more than 8 mm in an operationally stable manner.
A number of embodiments of the invention have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
102008053729.2 | Oct 2008 | DE | national |
This application is a continuation of, and claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §120 to, PCT/EP2009/006493, filed on Sep. 8, 2009, and designating the U.S., which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 to German Patent Application No. 10 2008 053 729.2, filed on Oct. 29, 2008. The contents of the prior applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/EP2009/006493 | Sep 2009 | US |
Child | 13095142 | US |