The present invention relates to a method of making a three-dimensional structure utilizing a flat substrate.
In particular, this invention relates to a computer-aided laser apparatus or other suited high energy beam, which sequentially remelts a plurality of powder layers to build a porous layer in a layer-by-layer fashion. The porous layer may be attached to an implant that may be created using a similar method.
Currently, implants such as femoral implants are constructed using various dies and casting processes. This procedure can be extremely expensive and time consuming. In addition, each implant must be made separately and requires its own casting device, which is usually destroyed when removing the completed implant.
The present application is particularly directed toward a method of forming a porous and partially-porous metallic structure having a bearing surface as well as metallic structures that are simply designed to be implanted into a person during surgery.
The field of free-form fabrication has seen many important recent advances in the fabrication of articles directly from computer-controlled databases. These advances, many of which are in the field of rapid prototyping of articles such as prototype parts and mold dies, have greatly reduced the time and expense required to fabricate articles, particularly in contrast to conventional machining processes in which a block of material, such as a metal, is machined according to the engineering drawings. One example of a modern rapid prototyping technology is the selective laser sintering process practiced by systems available from 3D Systems, Valencia, Calif. According to this technology, articles are produced in a layer-wise fashion, from a laser-fusible powder that is dispensed one layer at a time. The powder is fused, remelted or sintered, by the application of laser energy that is directed in raster-scan fashion to portions of the powder layer corresponding to a cross-section of the article. After fusing of the powder on one particular layer, an additional layer of powder is dispensed, and the process repeated with fusion taking place between the current layer and the previously laid layers, until the article is complete.
The field of rapid prototyping of parts has, in recent years, made large improvements in broadening high strain, high density parts for use in the design and pilot production of many useful articles including metal parts. These advances have permitted the selective laser remelting and sintering process to now also be used in fabricating prototype tooling for injection molding, with expected tool life in excess of 10,000 mold cycles. The technologies have also been applied to the direct fabrication of articles, such as molds from metal powders without a binder. Examples of metal powder reportedly used in such direct fabrication include two-phase metal powders of the copper-tins, copper-solder (the solder being 700 lead and 30% tin), and bronze-nickel systems. The metal articles formed in these ways have been quite dense, for example, having densities of up to 70% to 80% of full density (prior to any infiltration). Prior applications of this technology have strived to increase the density of the metal structure formed by the melting or sintering process. The field of rapid prototyping of parts has focused on providing high strength, high density parts for use and design in production of many useful articles, including metal parts.
But while the field of rapid prototyping has focused on increasing density of such three-dimensional structures, the field has not focused its attention on reducing the density of three-dimensional structures or growing a porous surface with a denser surface. Consequently, applications where porous and partially-porous metallic structures, and more particularly metal porous structures with interconnective porosity, are advantageous for use, have been largely ignored.
In addition, many structures, especially in the medical arts, require two different surfaces, each adapted for their own purposes. Along this line, a structure may have a first surface which needs to be porous for tissue in-growth and a second surface which should be adapted to be a bearing surface. Further, the first surface or portion may include different layers having different gradients of porosity. For example, the first surface may include an outer region having a porosity of approximately 80%. As you move normal with regard to the first surface the porosity may alter such that the porosity is increased or in a preferred embodiment, the porosity decreases even until the porosity is almost zero. Of course, the present invention contemplates a situation where the porosity alters from position to position depending on the requirements of the device.
Although different techniques have tried to provide such a method and apparatus, still greater techniques are needed in this area.
The present invention is directed to an implant and a method of making the implant. The method of constructing the implant includes providing a flat open model of a portion of a desired implant. The flat open model may be created with the use of scanning processes and computer software.
For instance, a 3-D model may be inputted into a computer program and the model flattened. The flattened model may then be reproduced using a selective laser sintering or melting process. The replicated model may also include various grooves as well as other desired features.
Once the model is replicated, porous pads may be attached to the flat open model. In an alternate embodiment the porous pads may be constructed on the flat open model during the SLS process.
A force may then be applied to the flat open model thereby causing the model to bend into a desired shape. The bent model may then be treated with various methods to form a final product.
The present invention relates to a method of forming an implant to be positioned in vivo during surgery, especially an orthopedic implant that replaces a joint, such as a knee joint, hip joint or shoulder joint. Although the present invention will be described with reference to a femoral component, the exemplified element should in no way be perceived as a limiting feature.
As used herein, the following directional definitions apply. Anterior and posterior mean nearer the front or nearer the back of the body respectively. Thus, for the knee joint described herein, anterior refers to that portion of the knee that is nearer the front of the body, when the leg is in an extended position. Proximal and distal mean nearer to or further from the root of the structure, respectively. For instance, the distal femur is part of the knee joint further from the hip joint while the proximal femur is closer to the hip joint. Finally, the adjectives medial and lateral mean nearer the sagittal plane or further from the sagittal plane respectfully.
As shown in
Femoral component 10 may comprise any biocompatible material having the mechanical properties necessary to function as a human knee femoral prosthesis. Preferably, femoral component 10 is comprised of titanium, titanium alloy, cobalt chrome alloy, stainless steel, or a ceramic. Particular compositions may be discussed herein depending on the method employed to construct the component and the particular requirements of the apparatus. Unless specifically stated, such compositions are merely illustrative.
The non-articulating internal surface 14 of the femoral component 10 is adapted to receive a resected distal femur (not shown in the figures). During the surgery, surgical cuts are made to the distal femur by any means, in any sequence and in any configuration known to those of skill in the art. In a preferred embodiment, the cuts of the resected distal femur correspond to the configuration of the internal surface 14 of the femoral component 10.
Along this line, the internal surface 14 may include a porous surface or as shown in
In a method of constructing the femoral component 10, a profile of a femoral knee implant may be inputted into various types of computer software. The profile can then be modeled, manipulated and “opened” such that a planar embodiment of the femoral component is now stored in a computer, as illustrated by
In one such method of operation, the planar top side 50 of the femoral component 10′ may be constructed using laser technology or any other high energy beam by employing a variety of scanning procedures. The planar top side 50 refers to the portion of the femoral component 10′ that includes the non-articulating internal surface 14′ and a certain depth therefrom and does not include the articulating external surface 12′. For instance, the top side of the femoral component 10′ may be prepared by building a model onto a build platform using a layer-by-layer build process, each layer corresponding to a layer of the femoral component 10′. The structure may be prepared by populating the volume of the structure with a single unit repeating cell using proprietary software. The single unit cell may be an octahedron or any other symmetrical or even asymmetrical geometric shape. By varying the tessellation, size, construct and various other factors, each layer may be constructed with a particular porosity.
According to one method of forming a porous three-dimensional structure by laser melting, a powder of titanium, titanium alloys, stainless steel, cobalt chrome alloys, tantalum or niobium is disposed onto a substrate. The laser melting process includes scanning a laser beam onto the powder and in parallel scan lines with a beam overlap, e.g., scan spacing, followed by similar additional scans or subsequent scans at 90 degrees, by way of example. The type of scan chosen may depend on the initial layer thickness as well as the web height required. The web height refers to the height of a single stage of the femoral component 10′. The web height may be increased by depositing additional layers of powder of a structure and scanning the laser at the same angle of the previous scan. Further, the additional scan lines may be at any angle to the first scan, to form a structure with the formation of a defined porosity, which may be regular or random. The scanned device may be programmed to proceed in a random generated manner to produce an irregular porous construct but with a defined level of porosity.
To produce a femoral component 10′, the nature of the material formed as a result of laser melting of powder beads is principally dependent upon the thermal profile involved (heating rate, soaking time, cooling rate); the condition of the raw material (size and size distribution of powder particles); atmospheric conditions (reducing, inert or oxidizing chamber gas); and accurate control of the deposited layer thickness.
The apparatus for building such a component may include an Nd; YAG industrial laser, integrated to an RSG 1014 analog galvo-scanning head for providing a maximum scan speed of 500 mm per second. The laser beam is directed into an atmospherically-controlled chamber, which consists of two computer-controlled platforms with powder delivery and part building. The powder is delivered from a variable capacity chamber into the chamber and is transported by a roller to a build platform above a variable capacity build chamber.
In one embodiment, the build and delivery system parameters are optimized for an even 100 μm coating of powder to be deposited for every build layer. For implant manufacture, the metals chosen as surface materials are all difficult to process due to their affinity for oxygen. Titanium and other alloys are easily oxidized when processed by laser in oxygen-containing atmosphere, their oxide products have high melting points and poor flowability. For this reason, and to prevent the formation of other undesirable phases, the methods may be carried out under an Argon inert atmosphere in chamber. Pressure may remain at or below atmospheric pressure during the entire application.
The key laser parameters varied for forming the three-dimensional metallic porous structures are: (a) Laser scanning speed (v.) in (mms-1), which controls the rate at which the laser traverses the powder bed; (b) Laser power, P(W), which in conjunction with the laser spot size controls the intensity of the laser beam; and (c) Frequency, (Hz) or pulse repetition rate which controls the number of laser pulses per second. A lower frequency delivers a higher peak power and vice versa.
Although the structure has been discussed with regard to randomly depositing powder onto a substrate and selectively laser melting the powder while repeating layer after layer, in contrast, each layer or portion of a layer, may be scanned to create a portion of a plurality of predetermined unit cells. As successive layers of powder are deposited onto previous layers, the scanning and depositing of such layers continues the building process of a predetermined unit cell. When constructing the predetermined unit cells, the preferred embodiment includes employing a pulse high energy beam to form “spots” on the deposited powder layer. At least some of the “spots” are joined to produce struts or portions of struts, which constitute a portion of a predetermined unit cell. The spots may be created at random, in a continuous manner or a combination of the two. As disclosed herein, continuing the building process refers not only to a continuation of a unit cell from a previous layer but also a beginning of a new unit cell as well as the completion of a unit cell.
The invention can include a laser melting process that precludes the requirement for subsequent heat treatment of the structure, thereby preserving the initial mechanical properties of the core or base metal. The equipment used for the manufacture of such a device could be one of many currently available including the MCP Realizer, the EOSINT M270, Trumpf Trumaform 250, the Arcam EBM S12 and the like. The laser may also be a custom-produced laboratory device.
As successive layers of metal powder are deposited onto previous layers, a laser head projects a beam of energy onto locations of the powder to thereby form a spot or portion of a strut of a predetermined unit cell. The laser scans the powder bed and projects the energy beam based on the slice data of the model contained in the computer program.
After a layer has been completed, successive layers of metal powder may be deposited onto the previous layer by the use of a powder feeder. The powder feeder may work in conjunction with a piston that is lowered prior to the depositing of the additional layer of metal powder. The piston is desirably positioned under the substrate on which the metal structure is built. As each layer is processed, the piston may be lowered and an additional layer of metal powder deposited onto the previous layer. In this manner, each layer of unprocessed powder is positioned at the same distance from the laser head. The laser beam is capable of being directed along an X-Y coordinate system such that the desired location of the layer of metal powder can be engaged by the beam of energy. The guiding of the laser beam is dependent on the manufacturing system used. For example, if an e-beam system is employed the movement of the e-beam is controlled by deployment of the magnetic fields. If a laser beam apparatus is employed, the movement or guidance of the laser beam is controlled by a galvanometer.
The pore density, pore size and pore size distribution can be controlled from one location on the structure to another. It is important to note that successive powder layers can differ in porosity by varying factors used for laser scanning powder layers. Additionally, the porosity of successive layers of powder can be varied by either creating a specific type of predetermined unit cell or manipulating various dimensions of a given predetermined unit cell.
As described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/027,421, such unit cell designs can be a tetrahedron, dodecahedron, octahedron, diamond, as well as many other various shapes. In addition, various struts may be removed from a unit cell to create an additional structure. Besides regular geometric shapes as discussed above, the unit cells of the present invention may be configured to have irregular shapes where various sides and dimensions have little if any repeating sequences. The unit cells can be configured to build constructs that closely mimic the structure of trabecular bone for instance. Unit cells can be space filling, in which all the space within a three-dimensional object is filled with cells, or interconnected where there may be some space left between cells but the cells are connected together by their edges. The unit cells can also be constructed in a form of a lattice. Additionally, adjacent lattices may be isolated from one another or only partially attached.
The unit cells can be distributed within the construct a number of ways. Firstly, they may be made into a block within a computer aided design (“CAD”) system where the dimensions correspond to the extent of the solid geometry. This block can then be intersected with the geometry representing the component to produce a porous cellular representation of the geometry. Secondly, the cells may be deformed so as to drape over an object thus allowing the cells to follow the surface of the geometry. Thirdly, the cells can be populated through the geometry following the contours of any selected surface.
The unit cell can be open or complete at the surface of the construct to produce a desired effect. For instance, open cells with truncated lattice struts produce a surface with a porosity and impart the surface with some degree of barb, whereas closed cells can be “peaky” so as to increase surface roughness.
Modifying the lattice strut dimensions can control the mechanical strength of the unit cell. This modification can be in a number of key areas. The lattice strut can be adjusted by careful selection of build parameters or specifically by changing the design of the cross-section of each strut. The density of the lattice can similarly be adjusted by modification of the density of the unit cells as can the extent and shape of porosity or a combination thereof. Clearly the overall design of the unit cell will also have a significant effect on the structural performance of the lattice. For instance, dodecahedral unit cells have a different mechanical performance when compared to a tetrahedral (diamond) structure.
Thus, employing either of these methods or additional methods, the planar top side 50 of the femoral component 10′ may be constructed including the porous pads 40′, and the non-articulating internal surface 14′ to a certain depth as required.
Further, as discussed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/027,421, by utilizing the selective laser sintering process, the various constructs built may be formed having a particular arrangement such that various stress levels and pressure locations can be directed to a predetermined position. This allows the femoral component or other built component to mimic the characteristics of a human bone or joint.
As shown in
The various portions of the planar top side 50 correspond to the anterior wall 28, anterior chamfer 30, distal floor 32, posterior chamfer 34 and posterior wall 36, when looking at both the femoral component 10 and the planar top side 50 from left to right in
As previously discussed, the porous pads 40′ may be constructed in tandem with the rest of the planar top side 50, such that the porous pads and planar top side 50 are a single element formed during the same stage in the process.
Once the planar top side 50 is removed from the building platform, it may be placed into a bending chamber (not shown in the figures). The bending chamber is able to apply pressure at specific locations on the planar top side 50 so as to bend and contort the planar top side 50 into a component that resembles the interior of the femoral component 10. The specific placements of the grooves, 52, 54, 56 and 58 as well as the specific locations where, how much, and for how long the pressure is applied can determine the final shape of the construct. In one bending operation, the planar top side 50 may be placed against a mandrel 70, as shown in
The shaped planar top side 50′ (
During the cold spray process, the gaseous cobalt chrome alloy is deposited onto the rear surface 49 of the shaped planar top side 50′, and as the gaseous cobalt chrome alloy solidifies, it forms the articulating external surface of the completed femoral component. The final surface may be machined by grinding and polishing the deposited cobalt chrome alloy such that the external surface 60 is able to articulate relative to a tibial component (not shown in the figures) once implanted during surgery. Although the cold spray process has been discussed with regard to employing a cobalt chrome alloy, various other materials may be employed such as but not limited to a high carbide chromium cobalt cermet (“C4”), or a titanium alloy. Choosing the material is dependent on various factors including the composition of the shaped planar top side 50′ as well as the particular characteristics of the different material.
If a titanium alloy is used during the cold spray process, it may be necessary to apply a coating of a ceramic material. In such a process, the ceramic coating may be thermally sprayed onto the titanium alloy. The ceramic coating may then be grinded to a desired thickness. If necessary, the ceramic coating may be subjected to a heat treating process such as by vacuum sintering or a hot isostatic press (HIP) before a final grind and polish step.
Rather than creating the articulating external surface 60 by cold spraying, it may be formed by sintering the shaped planar top side 50′ to a forged or cast cobalt chrome femoral preform. The femoral preform is constructed during a separate process. The femoral preform 100, as shown in
In order to complete the building process, the shaped planar top side 50′ is received within a cavity 106 of. the femoral component 100 such that the rear surface 49 of the shaped planar top side 50′ abuts the inner surface 102 of the femoral preform 100. Once in position, the two components may be sinter bonded together using methods known to those skilled in the art to form a completed femoral component, similar to that formed using the cold spray process. As before, the final femoral component may be machined where required.
In an alternate embodiment, the femoral preform may be constructed utilizing selective laser sintering technology as opposed to casting or forging. During this process, a model of the preform may be inputted into a computer and relayed to the apparatus employed for building constructs. Based on the inputted model, actual three-dimensional models may be constructed, each having the same dimensions and shapes. Of course, the dimensions and shape of the inputted model can be refined and altered in order to change the dimensions and shape of the built models. As with the cold spraying process, the femoral preform may be constructed of other material such as but not limited to C4 or titanium alloy.
Besides forming the articulating surface of the final femoral component using a cold spray technique or sintering a femoral preform to the shaped planar top side 50′, the articulating surface may be formed by hot spraying a cobalt chrome alloy, C4, titanium alloy or similar material onto the rear surface of the shaped planar top side 50′ or employing a high energy laser powder deposition process also preferably using a cobalt chrome alloy, C4, titanium alloy or similar material. As before, if a titanium alloy is used, a ceramic coating may be required. In either case, the articulating surface of the femoral component is formed directly onto the shaped planar top side 50′ to form a completed femoral component.
In an alternate embodiment, the planar top side may be formed onto and attached to a thin flat plate. The plate is preferably comprised of a titanium alloy. When forming the planar top side with a thin flat plate, similar to the previous embodiment, a three-dimensional model of a femoral component such as that shown in
In an alternate embodiment, as alluded to earlier, whether utilizing top planar side 50 or top planar side 150 in conjunction with thin plate 180, porous pads similar to those shown in
Although the porous pads have been discussed as being “grown” or “built” directly onto the non-articulating surface, i.e., the planar top side, of the femoral component, the porous pads can also be built separately and then attached to the non-articulating surface either before or after bending of the planar top sides 50 or 150. In such an embodiment, the planar top side may include locking mechanisms that enable an individual porous pad to be assembled and locked to the non-articulating internal surface of the femoral component. As before, the porous pads may be attached to the non-articulating internal surface prior to a bending process or after. In one such embodiment the non-articulating internal surface 214 or front surface 248 of planar top side 250 may include various clips 290 or extensions for locking the porous pads 240 to the surface, as shown in
The porous pads may be constructed individually, or in one preferred method a tall profile structure consisting of a plurality of porous pads may be constructed. For instance, as shown in
The construct 300 may then be cut along dissection lines 302, only a few of which are shown. The dissection lines 302 preferably are placed at a distance equivalent to a desired height of the porous pads. Thus, as each cut is made along a dissection line 302, a completed porous pad is formed, which can then be assembled to a femoral component or other implant where bone ingrowth is desired. The construct 300 may be dissected or cut using a saw, laser or similar technology known to those in the art. The resultant porous pads may be laser sintered to the femoral component or other implant or simply assembled thereto using various clips and locking mechanisms.
In an alternate embodiment, and as already alluded to, a construct 400 may be built having a varied porosity. In one preferred embodiment, as shown in
Porous pad 410 has a first surface 412 and a second surface 414. The second surface 414 is adapted to be placed against a surface of an implant, while the first surface 412 is adapted to confront bone and promote bone ingrowth. For this reason, the first surface 412 has a porosity specifically adapted for the promotion of bone ingrowth. The second surface 414 has a porosity that is less than the porosity of the first surface, thus providing a greater contact area between the porous pad 410 and the element to which the porous pad is attached to. This is particularly advantageous when the porous pad 410 is laser sintered to the implant.
Although the constructs have been described and shown having a relatively symmetrical shape, the constructs can be built having various shapes and dimensions, as well as being adapted for mating to additional surgical implants. For instance as shown in
Although the present invention herein has been described with reference to particular embodiments, it is to be understood that these embodiments are merely illustrative of the principles and applications of the present invention. It is therefore to be understood that numerous modifications may be made to the illustrative embodiments and that other arrangements may be devised without departing from the spirit or scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit of the filing date of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/755,260 filed Dec. 30, 2005, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3605123 | Hahn | Sep 1971 | A |
3806961 | Muller | Apr 1974 | A |
3816855 | Saleh | Jun 1974 | A |
4085466 | Goodfellow et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4164794 | Spector et al. | Aug 1979 | A |
4202055 | Reiner et al. | May 1980 | A |
4218494 | Belmondo et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
4305340 | Iwaki et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4344193 | Kenny | Aug 1982 | A |
4385404 | Sully et al. | May 1983 | A |
4502161 | Wall | Mar 1985 | A |
4636219 | Pratt et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4644942 | Sump | Feb 1987 | A |
4673408 | Grobbelaar et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4714473 | Bloebaum | Dec 1987 | A |
4714474 | Brooks, Jr. et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4719908 | Averill et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4863538 | Deckard | Sep 1989 | A |
4944817 | Bourell et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4961154 | Pomerantz et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4969907 | Koch et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4990163 | Ducheyne et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5004476 | Cook | Apr 1991 | A |
5017753 | Deckard | May 1991 | A |
5031120 | Pomerantz et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5034186 | Shimamune et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5053090 | Beaman et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5076869 | Bourell et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5080674 | Jacobs et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5108432 | Gustavson | Apr 1992 | A |
5147402 | Bohler et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5155324 | Deckard et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5158574 | Stone | Oct 1992 | A |
5171282 | Pequignot | Dec 1992 | A |
5176710 | Hahn et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5192328 | Winters | Mar 1993 | A |
5219362 | Tuke et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5282861 | Kaplan | Feb 1994 | A |
5282870 | Moser et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5287435 | Cohen et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5298115 | Leonard | Mar 1994 | A |
5314478 | Oka et al. | May 1994 | A |
5323954 | Shetty et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5358529 | Davidson | Oct 1994 | A |
5368602 | de la Torre | Nov 1994 | A |
5386500 | Pomerantz et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5398193 | deAngelis | Mar 1995 | A |
5443510 | Shetty et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5443518 | Insall | Aug 1995 | A |
5490962 | Cima et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5496372 | Hamamoto et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5504300 | Devanathan et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5514183 | Epstein et al. | May 1996 | A |
5549700 | Graham et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5571185 | Schug et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5571196 | Stein | Nov 1996 | A |
5609646 | Field et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5616294 | Deckard | Apr 1997 | A |
5640667 | Freitag et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5648450 | Dickens, Jr. et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5681354 | Eckhoff | Oct 1997 | A |
5702448 | Buechel et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5728162 | Eckhoff | Mar 1998 | A |
5735903 | Li et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5773789 | Devanathan et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5776201 | Colleran et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5782908 | Cahalan et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5795353 | Felt | Aug 1998 | A |
5824098 | Stein | Oct 1998 | A |
5824102 | Buscayret et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5879387 | Jones et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5879398 | Swarts et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5928285 | Bigliani et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5973222 | Devanathan et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5989472 | Ashby et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6046426 | Jeantette et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6049054 | Panchison et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6087553 | Cohen et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6096043 | Techiera et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6132468 | Mansmann | Oct 2000 | A |
6139585 | Li | Oct 2000 | A |
6190407 | Ogle et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6206924 | Timm | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206927 | Fell et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6215093 | Meiners et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6248131 | Felt et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251143 | Schwartz et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6280478 | Richter et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283997 | Garg et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6299645 | Ogden | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6355086 | Brown et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6371958 | Overaker | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6395327 | Shetty | May 2002 | B1 |
6406497 | Takei et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6454811 | Sherwood et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6476343 | Keicher et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6482209 | Engh et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6494914 | Brown et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6520996 | Manasas et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6530951 | Bates et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6551608 | Yao | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6558421 | Fell et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6582715 | Barry et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6599301 | Vibe-Hansen et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6632246 | Simon et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6652246 | Lin et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6652587 | Felt et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6682567 | Schroeder | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6686437 | Buchman et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6699252 | Farr, II et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6709462 | Hanssen | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6712822 | Re et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6712856 | Carignan et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6716957 | Tunc | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6770099 | Andriacchi et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6846329 | McMinn | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6850125 | Norman et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6855165 | Fell et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6863689 | Ralph et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6866684 | Fell et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6893463 | Fell et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6911044 | Fell et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6916341 | Rolston | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6921264 | Mayer et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6923831 | Fell et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6932610 | Ono et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7168283 | Van Note et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7494507 | Dixon et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7674517 | Ramsey et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
20010014403 | Brown et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20030069638 | Barlow et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040009228 | Tormala et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20050079200 | Rathenow et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050123672 | Justin et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050170159 | Ramsey et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060045903 | Kadiyala et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070225390 | Wang et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080161927 | Savage et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090068245 | Noble et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090087605 | Ramsey et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1949989 | Jul 2008 | EP |
9606881 | Mar 1996 | WO |
2007058160 | May 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080004709 A1 | Jan 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60755260 | Dec 2005 | US |