The present invention relates to a porous surface or structure and a method for forming the same, which uses a directed energy beam to selectively remelt a powder to produce a part. The energy beam may include a laser beam, and an electron beam or the like. In particular, this invention relates to a computer-aided laser apparatus, which sequentially remelts a plurality of powder layers to form unit cells to build the designed part in a layer-by-layer fashion. The present application is particularly directed toward a method of forming a porous and partially porous metallic structure.
The field of free-form fabrication has seen many important recent advances in the fabrication of articles directly from computer controlled databases. These advances, many of which are in the field of rapid prototyping of articles such as prototype parts and mold dies, have greatly reduced the time and expense required to fabricate articles, particularly in contrast to conventional machining processes in which a block of material, such as a metal, is machined according to engineering drawings.
One example of a modern rapid prototyping technology is the selective laser sintering process practiced by systems available from 3D Systems Valencia Calif. According to this technology, articles are produced in layer-wise fashion from a laser-fusible powder that is dispensed one layer at a time. The powder is fused, remelted or sintered, by the application of laser energy that is directed in raster-scan fashion to portions of the powder layer corresponding to a cross section of the article. After the fusing of the powder on one particular layer, an additional layer of powder is dispensed, and the process repeated, with fusion taking place between the current layer and the previously laid layers until the article is complete. Detailed descriptions of the selective laser sintering technology may be found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,863,538, 5,017,753, 5,076,869 and 4,944,817. The selective laser remelting and sintering technologies have enabled the direct manufacture of solid or dense three-dimensional articles of high resolution and dimensional accuracy from a variety of materials including wax, metal powders with binders, polycarbonate, nylon, other plastics and composite materials, such as polymer-coated metals and ceramics.
The field of the rapid prototyping of parts has, in recent years, made large improvements in broadening high strain, high density, parts for use in the design and pilot production of many useful articles, including metal parts. These advances have permitted the selective laser remelting and sintering processes to now also be used in fabricating prototype tooling for injection molding, with expected tool life in access of ten thousand mold cycles. The technologies have also been applied to the direct fabrication of articles, such as molds, from metal powders without a binder. Examples of metal powder reportedly used in such direct fabrication include two-phase metal powders of the copper-tins, copper-solder (the solder being 70% lead and 30% tin), and bronze-nickel systems. The metal articles formed in these ways have been quite dense, for example, having densities of up to 70% to 80% of fully dense (prior to any infiltration). Prior applications of this technology have strived to increase the density of the metal structures formed by the melting or sintering processes. The field of rapid prototyping of parts has focused on providing high strength, high density, parts for use and design in production of many useful articles, including metal parts.
However, while the field of rapid prototyping has focused on increasing density of such three-dimensional structures, the field has not focused its attention on reducing the density of three-dimensional structures. Consequently, applications where porous and partially porous metallic structures, and more particularly metal porous structures with interconnected porosity, are advantageous for use have been largely ignored. One such reference which hasn't ignored metal porous structures with interconnected porosity and having a relatively low density is commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/704,270 filed on Nov. 7, 2003, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference. Although this reference has provided various techniques in creating laser produced porous surfaces, still greater technologies are needed in this area.
In either case, the present invention is equally adapted for building porous structure having a high density or a low density.
The present invention provides a method for building various structures and surfaces but specifically medical implants. The structures are built in a layer-by-layer fashion with individual layers including portions of predetermined unit cells.
In one embodiment of the present invention, a layer of metal powder is deposited on a substrate. The substrate may be a work platform or a base, with the base or core being provided to possibly be an integral part of the finished product. After an individual layer of powder is deposited a scanning process may be preformed to selectively melt the powder to form portions of a plurality of predetermined unit cells. The scanning process includes scanning a laser beam onto the metal powder.
As successive layers are deposited and scanned a structure is built form one end to an opposite end. The structure includes a plurality of predetermined unit cells. The unit cells provide the structure with interconnecting pores as well as porosity. The size of the pores and porosity as well as other factors may all be predetermined.
In one preferred embodiment the size of the pores of the porosity of the built structure are specifically chosen to provide the structure with characteristics similar to medical implants.
In one aspect of the present invention disclosed is a method of producing a three-dimensional porous tissue in-growth structure. The method preferably includes depositing a first layer of a powder made from a metal selected from the group consisting of titanium, titanium alloys, stainless steel, cobalt chrome alloys, tantalum and niobium onto a substrate. The layer of powder is than scanned using a laser beam. The laser beam has a power, and scans the powder layer for a period of time with a point distance. The power of the laser beam is preferably within the range of 5 to 1000 watts although the present invention may be adapted for different power ranges. Additionally, in a preferred embodiment, the exposure time is in a range between 100 μsec to 1000 μsec. The laser beam scans the powder layer to form a portion of a plurality of predetermined unit cells. The predetermined unit cells include struts having cross-sectional dimensions. The cross-section of the struts may be any regular of irregular shape. A few such examples include, circular, rectangular, cubic cross-sections or the like.
In one preferred embodiment of the present invention the laser power is 90.5 W, the exposure time is 1000 μsec and the point distance is 90 μm.
The method also preferably includes depositing at least one additional layer of the powder onto the first layer and repeating the step of scanning the additional layers with a laser beam for at least one of the deposited layers in order to continuing forming the predetermined unit cells.
The predetermined unit cells make take the shape of most regular or irregular structure. For example, the unit cells may be in the shape of a tetrahedron, dodecahedron or octahedron as well as other symmetrical structures. As mentioned, the unit cells may not have such uniformity and have an irregular shape. The unit cells may also be truncated, which includes eliminating some of the struts, which form a unit cell. Truncated unit cells located at the exterior surface of a built product provide a barbed effect to the product.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the layers of metal powder have a thickness between 5 μm to 2000 μm.
The present invention may also include predetermining a porosity range for at least one deposited powder layer and scanning the layer in a manner to provide the deposited layer with porosity within the predetermined porosity range.
In one aspect of the present invention, the substrate may include a base, core, work platform or the like. As with the layer of powder, the metal selected to form the base or core may be selected from the group consisting of titanium, titanium alloys, stainless steel, cobalt chrome alloys, tantalum and niobium. Portions of the powder layers may be fused and or sintered to the base or core. The base or core may either be separated from the finished built product or may be an integral part of the finished product. If the base or core is an integral part of the finished product it may impart additional physical properties to the overall construct. The base or core may be constructed using the present invention.
In one aspect of the present invention a solid or semi-pervious layer may be placed between the substrate and the first deposited powder layer.
In another aspect of the present invention during the at least one of the steps of the scanning process, a plurality of satellites may be formed on portions of the predetermined unit cells. The satellites may remain attached to the predetermined unit cells so as to affect the porosity of the structure. In an alternate embodiment, the satellites may be removed. One way to remove the satellites is by an acid etching process. The acid etching process may be conducted not only to remove some of all of the satellites but also to alter the cross-sectional dimensions of various struts forming the predetermined unit cells.
In another aspect of the present invention, a plurality of struts may intersect at an intersection point. Either prior to completion of after completion of the finished structure, various intersection points may be sintered. In one reason for sintering the intersection points is to eliminate any unmelted metal powder spots.
In a preferred aspect of the present invention, the laser beam may be adjusted to modify the length and/or cross-section of various struts. Additionally, at least some of the unit cells may be deformed so as to drape over the substrate. Laser beam compensation may also be employed. Some of the struts of the unit cells may overlap struts of other unit cells. This aspect also enables the adjusting of the porosity throughout the completed structure.
At least some of the predetermined unit cells may be coated with unmelted metal particles.
In one aspect of the present invention the metal powder layers are deposited and scanned in order to form a medical implant. The medical implant preferably having porosity within a predetermined range. The medical implant may include an acetabular cup, acetabular shell, a knee implant, femoral or hip implant or the like. The constructed medical implant may have a porosity, which promotes bone in-growth and/or provides the medical implant with soft tissue characteristics.
The medical implants, as well as other constructed structures, may be provided with an attaching mechanism for anchoring or at least more firmly attaching the medical implant to another element. One such example is an acetabular shell being provided with a rim to snap-fit to an acetabular cup.
In another aspect of the invention, the structure may be subjected to a hot isostatic pressing.
In one preferred embodiment of the present invention, the method of producing a three-dimensional construct includes loading a file of a component into an engineering design package. The component is scaled down in the file from its original size. A Boolean operation is next performed to subtract the scaled down component from the original component. This creates a jacket. The jacket can than be processed using a bespoke application that populates the jacket with a repeating open cellular structure.
The open cellular structure is than sliced using the bespoke application to a predetermine thickness.
The main body of the file component jacket is loaded into a user interface program and the jacket is sliced into layers having a predetermined thickness. Hatching is than applied to the file component jacket as required to build a construct and the jacket is merged with the open cellular lattice structure. Once a representation has been obtained the depositing and scanning steps of the present invention may be conducted to build the final product.
Methods of forming the porous surface of the present invention can be performed in many ways and some embodiments will now be described by way of example and with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
This invention relates to a method of forming porous and partially porous metallic structures which are particularly but not exclusively applicable for use in hard or soft tissue interlock structures for medical implants and prosthesis. The method makes use of laser technology by employing a variety of scanning strategies. Typical metal and metal alloys employed include stainless steel, cobalt chromium alloys, titanium and its alloys, tantalum and niobium, all of which have been used in medical device applications. This invention can be used for such medical device applications where bone and soft tissue interlock with the component is required, or where a controlled structure is required to more closely match the mechanical properties of the device with surrounding tissue.
The intention of the present invention is to produce a three-dimensional structure using a laser remelting process, for example, for building structures utilizing unit cells with or without a solid base or core. When applied to an orthopedic prosthesis, the three-dimensional structure could be used to provide a porous outer layer to form a bone in-growth structure. Alternatively, the porous structure, when applied to a core, could be used to form a prosthesis with a defined stiffness to both fulfill the requirement of a modulus match with surrounding tissue and provide interconnected porosity for tissue interlock. A further use could be to form an all-porous structure with grade pore size to interact with more than one type of tissue. Again, the process can be used to build on a solid base or core with an outer porous surface, the porosity of which is constant or which varies. The base or core materials to which the process is applied may be either titanium and its alloys, stainless steel, cobalt chrome alloys, tantalum or niobium as well as any other suitable material. The preferred surface coatings are titanium, cobalt chrome and tantalum but both stainless steel and niobium can also be used as well as any other suitable material. Fully porous structures may be built from any of the materials tested, with the preferred material being titanium. The intention of the invention is to produce a method which can be exploited on a commercial basis for the production of, for example, bone interlock surfaces on a device although it has many other uses.
According to the present invention, a method of forming a three-dimensional structure includes building the shape by laser melting powdered Ti and alloys, stainless steel, cobalt chrome alloys, Ta or Nb using a continuous or pulsed laser beam. Individual layers of metal are scanned using a laser. Each layer or portion of a layer is scanned to create a portion of a plurality of predetermined unit cells, as will be described below. Successive layers are deposited onto previous layers and also may be scanned. The scanning and depositing of successive layers continues the building process of the predetermined unit cells. As disclosed herein, by continuing the building process refers not only to a continuation of a unit cell from a previous layer but also a beginning of a new unit cell as well as the completion of a unit cell.
The method can be performed so that the structure is porous and if desired, the pores can be interconnecting to provide an interconnected porosity.
If desired, the method can include using a base or core of cobalt chrome alloy, titanium or alloy, stainless steel, niobium and tantalum, on which to build a porous layer of any one of the aforementioned metals and alloys by laser melting using a continuous or pulsed laser beam. Thus, a mixture of desired mixed materials can be employed.
The method can be applied to an existing article made from cobalt chrome, titanium or alloy, stainless steel, tantalum or niobium, such as an orthopedic implant, to produce a porous outer layer from any of the aforementioned metals or alloys to provide a bone in-growth structure.
The invention can, therefore, include a laser melting process which precludes the requirement for subsequent heat treatment of the structure, thereby preserving the initial mechanical properties of the core or base metal. The equipment used for the manufacture of such a device could be one of many currently available including the MCP Realiszer, the EOS M270, Trumpf Trumaform 250, the Arcam EBM S12 and the like. The laser may also be a custom produced laboratory device.
The method can be applied to produce an all-porous structure using any of the aforementioned metal or metal alloys. Such structures can be used as final products, or further processed to form a useful device for bone or soft tissue in-growth, or as some other function such as that of a lattice to carry cells, for example.
The pore density, pore size and pore size distribution can be controlled from one location on the structure to another. It is important to note that successive powder layers can differ in porosity by varying factors used for laser scanning powder layers. Additionally, the porosity of successive layers of powder can be varied by either creating a specific type of unit cell or manipulating various dimensions of a given unit cell.
To produce a porous surface structure, the nature of the material formed as a result of laser melting of powdered beads is principally dependent on the thermal profile involved (heating rate, soaking time, cooling rate); the condition of the raw material (size and size distribution of powder particles); and atmospheric conditions (reducing, inert or oxidizing chamber gas).
There have been a number of studies to determine the optimum pore structure for maximization of bone in-growth on prostheses. The general findings suggest that optimum porosity is between approximately 20% and 40%, and aim to mid value with a mean volume percent of voids of about 70%. The preferred pore structure is interconnected, with a minimum pore size between about 80 μm and 100 μm and a maximum pore size between 80 μm and 800 μm. The structured thickness for in-growth is 1.4-1.6 mm, but can be larger or smaller depending on the application.
In the present invention porous structures are built in the form of a plurality of unit cells. Many designs of unit cells are possible to give the shape, type, degree, and size of porosity required. Such unit cell designs can be dodecahedral, octahedral, diamond, as well as many other various shapes. Additionally, besides regular geometric shapes as discussed above the unit cells of the present invention may be configured to have irregular shapes where various sides and dimensions have little if any repeating sequences. The unit cells can be configured to constructs that closely mimic the structure of trabecular bone for instance. Unit cells can be space filling, all the space within a three-dimensional object is filled with cells, or interconnected where there may be some space left between cells but the cells are connected together by their edges.
The cells can be distributed within the construct a number of ways. Firstly, they may be made into a block within a computer automated design system where the dimensions correspond to the extent of the solid geometry. This block can then be intersected with the geometry representing the component to produce a porous cellular representation of the geometry. Secondly, the cells may be deformed so as to drape over an object thus allowing the cells to follow the surface of the geometry. Thirdly, the cells can be populated through the geometry following the contours of any selected surface.
The unit cell can be open or complete at the surface of the construct to produce a desired effect. For instance, open cells with truncated lattice struts produce a surface with a porosity and impart the surface with some degree of barb.
Modifying the lattice strut dimensions can control the mechanical strength of the unit cell. This modification can be in a number of key areas. The lattice strut can be adjusted by careful selection of build parameters or specifically by changing the design of the cross-section of each strut. The density of the lattice can similarly be adjusted by modification of the density of the unit cells as can the extent and shape of porosity or a combination thereof. Clearly the overall design of the unit cell will also have a significant effect of the structural performance of the lattice. For instance, dodecahedral unit cells have a different mechanical performance when compared to a tetrahedral (diamond) structure.
As shown in
Each carbon atom in the diamond is surrounded by four nearest neighbors. They are connected together by bonds that separate them by a distance of 1.5445 angstroms. The angles between these bonds are 109.5 degrees. As a result, the central atom and its neighbors form a tetrahedron. This geometry as in the case discussed herein may then be scaled to appropriate value for the pore construct required.
The two key parameters used to define the relations regarding height, surface area, space height, volume of tetrahedron, and the dihedral angle of a tetrahedron are the strand length of the tetrahedron and, i.e., the diameter or height and width, cross section area of the strand i.e., strut. These two parameters control the pore size and porosity of the structure. The parameter editor and relation editor within a typical CAD system can be used to control these parameters. Hence, by changing the parameters one can change the fundamental properties of the porous structure. As shown in
To create the mesh as shown in
As shown in
In a method of use, a sweep feature is first used to model the dodecahedron structure by driving a profile along a trajectory curve. The trajectory curves are constructed from datum points corresponding to the vertices of the dodecahedron connected by datum curves. The type of profile remains constant along the sweep producing the model shown in
As shown in
In a method of use, a CAD model of the truncated octahedron is constructed using the sweep feature and calculations and dimensions are incorporated using basic trigonometry. Two tessellate the unit cell, the unit cell is first reoriented to enable easy tessellation and to reduce the number of horizontal struts in the model. Further, the model can be modified to remove all of the horizontal struts as shown in
As shown in
Random representative geometries may be made from the current regular unit cells by applying a random X, Y, Z perturbation of the vertices of the unit cells. Perturbation to the vertices of the unit cells inherently forms irregular unit cells. One such example can be seen in
In one example of this procedure an STL file of hip component 50 is loaded into an engineering design package such as Magics, as shown in
Jacket 56 is processed via a bespoke application that populates STL shapes with repeating open cellular lattice structures (OCLS). The OCLS used in this instance is a repeating unit cell of size 1.25 millimeters and strand diameter 200 μm.
Although the present invention has been described with regard to the femoral hip component as shown in
In other aspect of the present invention an existing product may be coated with various metal layers and then scanned with a laser in order to produce a finished product. In order to apply coating to existing products having either concave and/or convex profiles the present invention i.e., SLM requires the design of a special powder lay system. One such example was conducted and is shown in
In an alternate embodiment of the present invention, the process can be parallelized by addition of many pistons and cylinder pairs around a central laser beam. Optimal laser alignment to the surface can be achieved by a number of methods, including inclining the piston and cylinder pairs so the powder surface and the part surface are correctly aligned normal to the laser beam. Typical operating parameters are shown in Table 5 below.
In another aspect of the present invention the laser produced porous structure system may be used to manufacture a porous shell which then can be inserted over a substrate and sintered in order to fix permanently to the same. Some examples include the preparation of an acetabular cup component, a tibia knee insert component, and a femoral insert as well as many additional products. In order to illustrate this aspect of the present invention, reference will be made to the outer profile of an acetabular component which serves as an inner profile of a “cap” to insure that an accurate fit is achieved when the cap is set on the substrate (acetabular shell). The cup is built to a thickness of 1.5 millimeters for example using a diamond configured construct to develop the interconnecting porosity. The metal powder used in one example is stainless steel. The processing parameters are shown in Table 6 listed below:
However, the process parameters are dependent on the metal used and if a different metal, say for example, titanium was used, the parameters would be different.
In order to achieve a better and tighter fit of the cap over the component, some adjustments to the geometry of the cap may be considered. For example, the inclusion of a rim 70 on the inner surface of the cap that interfaces with the groove 72 on the outer surface of the acetabular cup component 68 may be included. This mechanism acts a simple lock and gives both security and extra rigidity during the sintering process. Additional modifications may be utilized to improve closeness of the fit and stability. For instance, the introduction of “snap-fits” which are apparent in everyday plastic components may be employed to provide a more reliable attachment mechanism between the two elements. Typical pads or center pads for both the femoral and tibial knee components can be produced by the SLM process and dropped or snapped fit into place to the components and then sintered to attach firmly to the underlying substrate. As previously stated, this technique can apply to other components where a porous outer surface is required to interface with either soft or hard tissue.
A further improvement in the mechanical and microstructural properties of the porous construct may be achieved by either conventional sintering under vacuum or inert atmosphere and/or hot isostatic pressing using temperature regimes known in the state of the art. As the constructs possess high density properties throughout their strands minimal degradation in the structure of the construct is apparent.
In another aspect of the present invention, the appearance of the porous construct can be changed by the alteration of the processing conditions or by the introduction of an acid etch process. For example, the laser power or laser residence time may be reduced or a combination of both which creates struts of the porous construct having a coating with layers of unmelted metal particles firmly adhered to the strut surfaces. This has the effect of producing additional porous features that offer a new dimension to the overall porous structure of the construct. Such features are able to interact with cells in a different manner than the microstructure imparted by the lattice construct and provide extra benefits. A typical example of such construct with this satellite appearance as depicted in
It is also possible to remove these satellites by an acid etching process and a strong acid. The acid may consist of a mixture of 10 milliliters of hydrogenfloride (HF), 5 milliliters of nitric acid (HNO3) and 85 milliliters of H2O. the HF and HNO3 were respectively 48% and 69% concentrated.
Although the invention herein has been described with reference to particular embodiments, it is to be understood that these embodiments are merely illustrative of the principles and applications of the present invention. It is therefore to be understood that numerous modifications may be made to the illustrative embodiments and that other arrangements may be devised without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/846,327 filed Jul. 29, 2010, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/027,421 filed Dec. 30, 2004, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
222687 | Fresco | Dec 1879 | A |
2373769 | Macy | Apr 1945 | A |
3520099 | Mattes | Jul 1970 | A |
3556918 | Lemelson | Jan 1971 | A |
3605123 | Pratt et al. | Sep 1971 | A |
3806961 | Muller | Apr 1974 | A |
3816855 | Saleh | Jun 1974 | A |
3826054 | Culpepper, Jr. | Jul 1974 | A |
3906550 | Rostoker et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
4047349 | Aguilar, Jr. | Sep 1977 | A |
4073999 | Bryan et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4085466 | Goodfellow et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4117302 | Earle et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4154040 | Pace | May 1979 | A |
4164794 | Spector et al. | Aug 1979 | A |
4202055 | Reiner et al. | May 1980 | A |
4218494 | Belmondo et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
4247508 | Housholder | Jan 1981 | A |
4259072 | Hirabayashi et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4305340 | Iwaki et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4344193 | Kenny | Aug 1982 | A |
4385404 | Sully et al. | May 1983 | A |
4444818 | Tominaga et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4474861 | Ecer | Oct 1984 | A |
4502161 | Wall | Mar 1985 | A |
4513045 | Bondoc et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4543158 | Bondoc et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4550448 | Kenna | Nov 1985 | A |
4636219 | Pratt et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4644942 | Sump | Feb 1987 | A |
4673408 | Grobbelaar | Jun 1987 | A |
4673409 | Van Kampen | Jun 1987 | A |
4714473 | Bloebaum | Dec 1987 | A |
4714474 | Brooks, Jr. et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4719908 | Averill et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4766029 | Brock et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4863538 | Deckard | Sep 1989 | A |
4944756 | Kenna | Jul 1990 | A |
4944817 | Bourell et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4957819 | Kawahara et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4961154 | Pomerantz et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4969302 | Coggan et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4969907 | Koch et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4969910 | Frey et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4990163 | Ducheyne et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5002572 | Picha | Mar 1991 | A |
5004476 | Cook | Apr 1991 | A |
5017753 | Deckard | May 1991 | A |
5024670 | Smith et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5031120 | Pomerantz et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5034186 | Shimamune et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5053090 | Beaman et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5067964 | Richmond et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5076869 | Bourell et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5080674 | Jacobs et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5090174 | Fragale | Feb 1992 | A |
5108432 | Gustavson | Apr 1992 | A |
5108441 | McDowell | Apr 1992 | A |
5147402 | Bohler et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5150304 | Berchem et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5155324 | Deckard et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5158574 | Stone | Oct 1992 | A |
5171282 | Pequignot | Dec 1992 | A |
5176710 | Hahn et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5192328 | Winters | Mar 1993 | A |
5219362 | Tuke et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5274565 | Reuben | Dec 1993 | A |
5282861 | Kaplan | Feb 1994 | A |
5282870 | Moser et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5287435 | Cohen et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5314478 | Oka et al. | May 1994 | A |
5323954 | Shetty et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5336518 | Narayanan et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5352405 | Beaman et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5356433 | Rowland et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5358529 | Davidson | Oct 1994 | A |
5368602 | de la Torre | Nov 1994 | A |
5370692 | Fink et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5386500 | Pomerantz et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5398193 | deAngelis | Mar 1995 | A |
5425210 | Zafir | Jun 1995 | A |
5443510 | Shetty et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5443518 | Insall | Aug 1995 | A |
5461839 | Beck | Oct 1995 | A |
5486599 | Saunders et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5489306 | Gorski | Feb 1996 | A |
5490962 | Cima et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5496372 | Hamamoto et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5504300 | Devanathan et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5507815 | Wagner et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5510066 | Fink et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5514183 | Epstein et al. | May 1996 | A |
5518680 | Cima et al. | May 1996 | A |
5526627 | Beck | Jun 1996 | A |
5549700 | Graham et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5571185 | Schug | Nov 1996 | A |
5571196 | Stein | Nov 1996 | A |
5580353 | Mendes et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5609646 | Field et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5616294 | Deckard | Apr 1997 | A |
5624463 | Stone et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5632745 | Schwartz | May 1997 | A |
5640667 | Freitag et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5648450 | Dickens, Jr. et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5665118 | LaSalle et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5681354 | Eckhoff | Oct 1997 | A |
5702448 | Buechel et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5714103 | Bauer et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5716358 | Ochoa et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5728162 | Eckhoff | Mar 1998 | A |
5729946 | Beck | Mar 1998 | A |
5735903 | Li et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5749874 | Schwartz | May 1998 | A |
5768134 | Swaelens et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5769092 | Williamson, Jr. | Jun 1998 | A |
5769899 | Schwartz et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5773789 | Devanathan et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5776201 | Colleran et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5782908 | Cahalan et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5795353 | Felt | Aug 1998 | A |
5798924 | Eufinger et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5824098 | Stein | Oct 1998 | A |
5824102 | Buscayret | Oct 1998 | A |
5839247 | Beck | Nov 1998 | A |
5857303 | Beck et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5866113 | Hendriks et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5879387 | Jones et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5879398 | Swarts et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5928285 | Bigliani et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5973222 | Devanathan et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5987838 | Beck | Nov 1999 | A |
5989472 | Ashby et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6013855 | McPherson et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6042774 | Wilkening et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6045581 | Burkinshaw | Apr 2000 | A |
6046426 | Jeantette et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6049054 | Panchison et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6077989 | Kandel et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6087553 | Cohen et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6096043 | Techiera et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112109 | D'Urso | Aug 2000 | A |
6128866 | Wearne | Oct 2000 | A |
6132468 | Mansmann | Oct 2000 | A |
6139585 | Li | Oct 2000 | A |
6149689 | Grundei et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6164032 | Beck | Dec 2000 | A |
6171340 | McDowell | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6190407 | Ogle et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6206924 | Timm | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206927 | Fell et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6209621 | Treacy | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6215093 | Meiners et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6217615 | Sioshansi et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6248131 | Felt et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251143 | Schwartz et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254639 | Peckitt | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261322 | Despres, III et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261493 | Gaylo et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6280478 | Richter et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283997 | Garg et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6299645 | Ogden | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6344061 | Leitao et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6350284 | Tormala et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6355086 | Brown et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6368354 | Burstein et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6370382 | Kang et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371958 | Overaker | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385585 | Jonsson et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6395327 | Shetty | May 2002 | B1 |
6406497 | Takei | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6415574 | Beck | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6454811 | Sherwood et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6476343 | Keicher et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6482209 | Engh et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6494914 | Brown et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6497728 | Yong | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6520996 | Manasas et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6530951 | Bates et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6551608 | Yao | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6558421 | Fell et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6582715 | Barry et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6589283 | Metzger et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6592598 | Vibe-Hansen et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6599301 | Vibe-Hansen et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6599322 | Amrich et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6610067 | Tallarida et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6626945 | Simon et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6632246 | Simon et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6652246 | Lin et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6652587 | Felt et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6676892 | Das et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6679917 | Ek | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6682567 | Schroeder | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6686437 | Buchman et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6699252 | Farr, II et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6702848 | Zilla et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6709462 | Hanssen | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6712822 | Re et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6712856 | Carignan et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6716957 | Tunc | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6743232 | Overaker et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6770099 | Andriacchi et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6772026 | Bradbury et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6802864 | Tornier | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6811569 | Afriat et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6846329 | McMinn | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6850125 | Norman et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6852125 | Simon et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6855165 | Fell et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6863689 | Ralph et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6866684 | Fell et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6893463 | Fell et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6911044 | Fell et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6916341 | Rolston | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6921264 | Mayer et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6923831 | Fell et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6932610 | Ono et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6993406 | Cesarano, III et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7051417 | Michelson | May 2006 | B2 |
7168283 | Van Note et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7332537 | Bredt et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7388972 | Kitson | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7494507 | Dixon et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7497876 | Tuke et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7521017 | Kunze et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7597715 | Brown et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7632575 | Justin et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7637942 | Mangiardi et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7674517 | Ramsey et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7718109 | Robb et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7747305 | Dean et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7779890 | Frasier et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7875083 | Sudmann | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8029575 | Borden | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8090540 | Leo et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8247333 | Sypeck et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8308807 | Seebeck et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8350186 | Jones et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8430930 | Hunt | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8551173 | Lechmann et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8796015 | Gingras | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8843229 | Vanasse et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8888862 | McDonnell et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8979938 | Linares | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8983646 | Hanna | Mar 2015 | B1 |
9370426 | Gabbrielli et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9801974 | Landon | Oct 2017 | B2 |
20010014403 | Brown et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020007294 | Bradbury et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020010512 | Takei | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020015654 | Das et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020016635 | Despres et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020062154 | Ayers | May 2002 | A1 |
20020102674 | Anderson | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020127328 | Shetty | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020130112 | Manasas et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020151983 | Shetty | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020173855 | Mansmann | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020187458 | Dolabdjian et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198528 | Engh et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030012805 | Chen et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030032351 | Horner et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030033018 | Merchant | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030045941 | Lewallen | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055500 | Fell et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055501 | Fell et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060882 | Fell et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060883 | Fell et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060884 | Fell et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060885 | Fell et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060888 | Fell et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065400 | Beam et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030069638 | Barlow et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030069718 | Hollister et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030153977 | Suguro et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030153981 | Wang et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030155686 | Hawkins et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030158606 | Coon et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030206820 | Keicher et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030209305 | Smith et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220696 | Levine et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040006393 | Burkinshaw | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040009228 | Tormala et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015170 | Tallarida et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040023586 | Tilton | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040044414 | Nowakowski | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040054416 | Wyss et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059356 | Gingras | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040098132 | Andriacchi et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040121110 | Schmidt et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040143339 | Axelson et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143341 | McLean | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040148030 | Ek | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153163 | Posner | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040162622 | Simon et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040167633 | Wen et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040191106 | O'Neill et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199249 | Fell | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040199250 | Fell | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040204766 | Siebel | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040230315 | Ek | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243237 | Unwin et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267363 | Fell et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050033424 | Fell | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043816 | Datta et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050048193 | Li et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050070989 | Lye et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050079200 | Rathenow et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085918 | Soffiati et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085922 | Shappley et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050100578 | Schmid et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050103765 | Kawasaki | May 2005 | A1 |
20050112397 | Rolfe et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050123672 | Justin et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050154471 | Aram et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050169893 | Koblish et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050170159 | Ramsey et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050171604 | Michalow | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177169 | Fisher et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192672 | Wyss et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203630 | Pope et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060015187 | Hunter et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060036331 | Lu et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060045903 | Kadiyala et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060106419 | Gingras | May 2006 | A1 |
20060116774 | Jones et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060147332 | Jones et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060241776 | Brown et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060254200 | Clarke et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070071733 | Kandel et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070142914 | Jones et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070150068 | Dong et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156249 | Lawrynowicz et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070173948 | Meridew et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070225390 | Wang et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080004709 | O'Neill et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080050412 | Jones et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080071381 | Buscher et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080161927 | Savage et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080206862 | Asgari | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080288083 | Axelsson et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090068245 | Noble et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090087605 | Ramsey et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112315 | Fang et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100057211 | Cuckler et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100137990 | Apatsidis et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100174377 | Heuer | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110076316 | Sivananthan et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110200478 | Billiet et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110245930 | Alley et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120022662 | Conway et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120067853 | Wang et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120148987 | Dolabdjian et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120215310 | Sharp et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120245697 | Hunter et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130056912 | O'Neill et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130123935 | Hunt et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130158672 | Hunt | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130218282 | Hunt | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130268085 | Dong et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140058526 | Meridew et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140121776 | Hunt | May 2014 | A1 |
20140277548 | Cohen et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140288649 | Hunt | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140288650 | Hunt | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140343681 | Cohen et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150374882 | McDemus et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20170095337 | Pasini et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20180280140 | Jones et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180361510 | Stamp et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190133770 | Dion et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2295896 | Jul 2000 | CA |
101301230 | Nov 2008 | CN |
102087676 | Jun 2011 | CN |
19502733 | Mar 1996 | DE |
0 178 650 | Apr 1986 | EP |
0295038 | Dec 1988 | EP |
0 528 800 | Mar 1993 | EP |
3761242 | Mar 1997 | EP |
1247537 | Oct 2002 | EP |
1 300 511 | Apr 2003 | EP |
1418013 | May 2004 | EP |
1426013 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1455666 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1493455 | Jan 2005 | EP |
1683593 | Jul 2006 | EP |
1800700 | Jun 2007 | EP |
1806154 | Jul 2007 | EP |
1949989 | Jul 2008 | EP |
2255329 | Oct 1990 | JP |
4041794 | Feb 1992 | JP |
11287020 | Oct 1999 | JP |
11348045 | Dec 1999 | JP |
2001303751 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2003293012 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2006158953 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2218242 | Dec 2003 | RU |
9606881 | Mar 1996 | WO |
9824574 | Jun 1998 | WO |
9933641 | Jul 1999 | WO |
02085246 | Oct 2002 | WO |
2005084216 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2005080029 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2005087982 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2007058160 | May 2007 | WO |
2009116950 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2011002765 | Jan 2011 | WO |
2013006778 | Jan 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Created and Designed by Shaman Gaspar, Maintained by Peter Fox, “Direct Laser Remelting”, “Project Web Site”, Using Lasers to Grow 3D object on Stainless Steel; The University of Liverpool 2002; http://mserc.liv.ac.uk/research/dlr/dlr_html. |
Hollander et al., Structural mechanical and in vitro characterization of individually structured Ti-A1-4V produces by direct layer forming, Biomaterials, pp. 1-9, 2005. |
Vureal et al., Plasma-sprayed oxide ceramics on steel substrates, Surface Coatings and Technology, 97 (1997) 347-354. |
Patello-femoral Arthroplasty X-ray Results, Stryker Howmedica Osteonics, published on or before Apr. 5, 2011. |
The Metals Handbook, Desk Edition, 2nd Edition, ASM International, 1998, p. 29. |
Meiners et al., “Direct Generation of Metal Parts and Tools by Selective Laser Powder Remelting (SLPR)”, W. Meiners, C. Over, K. Wissenbach, R. Poprawe, pp. 655-661 Austin, Texas, Aug. 9-11, 1999. |
Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary, 14th edition. John Wiley & Sons, 2002. Definition: sintering. |
Dr. Kerron Harvey, producer, Research Intelligence, The University of Liverpool, Issue 13, Jun. 2002. |
H.J. Niu and I.T.H. Chang, “Selective Laser Sintering of Gas and Water Atomized High Speed Steel Powders,” Scripta Materialia vol. 41, No. 1, (1999), pp. 25-30. |
European Search Report and Written Opinion, EP05028133, dated May 11, 2010. |
European Search Report and Written Opinion, EP10162970, dated Jun. 17, 2010. |
R. Morgan, C.J. Sutcliffe, W. O'Neill, “Experimental investigatoin of nanosecond pulsed Nd:YAG laser re-melted pre-placed powder beds,” Rapid Prototyping Journal, vol. 7, No. 3, 2001, pp. 159-172. |
N.K. Vail, L.D. Swain, W.C. fox, T.B. Aufdlemorte, G. Lee, J.W. Barlow, “Materials for biomedical applications,” Materials and Design, 20, 1999, pp. 123-132. |
R.H. Morgan, A.J. Papworth, C. Sutcliffe, P. Fox, W. O'Neill, “High density net shape components by direct laser re-melting of single phase powders,” Journal of Materials Science, 37, 2002, pp. 3093-3100. |
European Search Report and Written Opinion, EP06127218, dated May 6, 2010. |
PCT/US2008/008955 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 2, 2008. |
PCT/US2008/008955 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Feb. 4, 2010. |
C.K. Chua et al. Development of a Tissue Engineering Scaffold Structure Library for Rapid Prototyping. Parts 1 and 2, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, (2003) vol. 21, pp. 291-312. |
Australian Examination Report for Application No. 2013202686 dated Aug. 7, 2014. |
Chen, 3D Texture Mapping for Rapid Manufacturing, University of Southern California, 2007. |
Engelbrecht et al., Cellular Structures for Optimal Performance, Georgia Institute of Technology & Paramount Industries, Inc., 2009. |
Wang, Computer-Aided Design Methods for Additive Fabrication of Truss Structures, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2002. |
Australian Examination Report for Application No. 2013202075 dated Feb. 13, 2015. |
Canadian Office Action and Examination Search Report for Appln. No. 2,860,188 dated Jun. 4, 2015. |
“Solid Freeform Fabrication”, IEEE Spectrum, Feb. 1999, pp. 34-43. |
Custom Design and Manufacturing of Canine Knee Implants,<http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/670>, Issued Dec. 2, 2003. |
Tuan et al., “Application of Micro CT and Computation Modeling in Bone Tissue Engineering”, Computer-Aided Design, vol. 37, No. 11, Sep. 2005, pp. 1151-1161. |
Akamaru et al., “Healing of Autologous Bone in a Titanium Mesh Case Used in Anterior Column Reconstruction After Total Spondylectomy”, SPINE vol. 27, No. 13, 2002, pp. E329-E333. |
Cheung et al., “Spinal Instrumentation Overview in Lumbar Degenerative Disorders: Cages”, Chapter 26 / Spinal—Instrumentation Overview, Section IV/Surgery, Lumbar Spine: Official Publication of the International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine (3), 2004, pp. 286-291. |
Cunningham et al., “Design of Interbody Fusion Cages: Historical Considerations and Current Perspectives in Cage Technology”, Surgical Techniques; Spinal Implants; Chapter 29-31, 2006, pp. 421-465. |
EBI Learning Center Cafe flyer, EBI Spine EBI & Interpore Cross, NASS Booth 801, prior to Sep. 27, 2005, Philadelphia, PA. |
Zdeblick et al., “LT-CAGE—Lumbar Tapered Fusion Device—Surgical Technique”, Medtronic Sofamor Danek, 25 pages, Copyright 2000. |
Kim et al., “Spinal Instrumentation Surgical Techniques”, Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., New York, NY, Copyright 2005, 41 pages. |
Lin et al., “Interbody Fusion Cage Design Using Integrated Global Layout and Local Microstructure Topology Optimization”, SPINE vol. 29, No. 16, pp. 1747-1754, Aug. 2004. |
Lin et al., “Structural and mechanical evaluations of a topology optimized titanium interbody fusion cage fabricated by selective laser melting process”, Received Jan. 31, 2006, revised Aug. 25, 2006, accepted Dec. 2006, Published online Apr. 5, 2007 in Wiley Interscience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.31231. 8 pages. |
McAfee et al., “Current Concepts Review: Interbody Fusion Cages in Reconstructive Operations on the Spine”, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 81, Issue 6, Jun. 1999, pp. 859-880. |
Stephen D. Kuslich, MD, “Lumbar Interbody Cage Fusion for Back Pain: An Update on the Bak (Bagby and Kuslich) System”, SPINE: State of the art reviews—vol. 13, No. 2, May 1999, pp. 295-311. |
Williams et al., “CT evaluation of lumbar interbody fusion: Current concepts”, AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:2057-2066, Sep. 2005. |
Cheah et al., Automatic Algorithm for Generating Complex Polyhedral Scaffold Structures for Tissue Engineering, Tissue Engineering, vol. 10, No. 3/4, pp. 595-610, Mar. 2004. |
Heinl et al., Cellular Ti-6AI-4V structures with interconnected macro porosity for bone implants fabricated by selective electron beam melting, Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 4, Issue 5, pp. 1536-1544, Sep. 2008. |
EP Office Communication on Third Party Observation for EP Application No. 05028133.6, dated Mar. 25, 2019, 67 pages. |
Third Party Observation for EP05028133.6 dated May 18, 2020, 3 pages. |
Williams, et al., “Advances in Modeling the Effects of Selected Parameters on the SLS Process,” Rapid Prototyping Journal, Jun. 1, 1998, pp. 90-100, vol. 4, No. 2. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170014235 A1 | Jan 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12846327 | Jul 2010 | US |
Child | 15277744 | US | |
Parent | 11027421 | Dec 2004 | US |
Child | 12846327 | US |