Patent Grant
8051679
This invention relates to laser separation of glass sheets, such as the glass sheets used as substrates in the production of display devices, e.g., thin film transistor liquid crystal displays (TFT-LCDs), and more particularly to full body separation of a glass sheet in a single step (i.e. without the need for pre-separation scoring).
Cutting of glass is conventionally accomplished by using mechanical tools. Typically, the glass is first scored, such as by using a scoring tool (e.g. a sharp carbide wheel for example) that creates a score, or median crack, in the glass, and incidentally, substantial damage to the glass at the cut edge. However, alternative processes exist that use CO2 laser radiation at a wavelength of 10.6 μm to heat the glass and create tensile stress via a temperature gradient to produce a score, a less damaging process. During laser scoring, a small initial flaw is formed on a surface of the glass near one of its edges to generate a median crack (also known as a partial vent or, simply, a vent). The vent is then propagated by a laser light formed into a beam that traverses across the surface of the glass followed by a cooling area produced by a cooling nozzle. Heating of the glass with a laser beam and quenching it immediately thereafter with a coolant creates a thermal gradient and a corresponding stress field that is responsible for the propagation of the vent. When the score is completed, bending or shear stress is then applied to the glass that causes the vent to complete its propagation through the thickness of the sheet. In either case, however, separation of the glass sheet is a two step process consisting of creating a score, and then applying a stress to the glass (e.g. a bending stress) to propagate the vent and separate the sheet, sometimes referred to as “score and snap”. In some processes, a second laser beam may be used to apply thermal stress to the glass that completes the separation process.
A problem with conventional techniques for separating sheets of glass using a laser relates to the coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) of the glass as it is initially scored. Conventional laser scoring techniques have used glasses with relatively high CTE'S, e.g., Corning Incorporated's Code 1737 LCD glass which has a CTE (0-300° C.) above 37×10−7/° C. More recent glasses, e.g., Corning's EAGLE2000® and EAGLE XG™ glasses, have lower CTE'S. Higher CTE'S, such as that of Code 1737 glass, translate into higher tensile stresses during heating which, all other things being equal, means that it is easier to laser score such glasses at higher speeds. The lower CTE's of the more modern glass substrates used by the LCD industry result in much lower scoring speeds when conventional laser scoring technology is used, further prolonging such two step methods. Finally, the two step process can be challenging to achieve good edge quality.
It would be beneficial to provide a single step process for separating glass sheets that can provide a clean edge (minimal damage to the glass) with minimal residual stress with a faster cycle time.
In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, a method of separating a glass sheet is disclosed comprising a) translating a single elongated laser beam having a peak intensity Ipeak over a surface of the glass sheet at a speed S, said beam being characterized by an untruncated length L0, where L0 equals the maximum distance along the length of the beam between locations at which the beam intensity at the surface of the glass sheet, in the absence of any truncation, has fallen to 1/e2 of Ipeak; (b) translating a coolant area over the surface of the glass sheet in tandem with the laser beam, thereby separating the glass sheet into sub-pieces; wherein: (i) S is less than about 200 millimeters/second; (ii) L0 is greater than or equal to 100 millimeters; and (iii) Ipeak and L0 are selected such that translation of the laser beam over the surface of the glass sheet at speed S produces a maximum temperature at the surface of the glass sheet that is at least about 150° C. less than a strain point of the glass; and wherein the glass sheet is separated in a single traverse of the laser beam.
The reference numbers and symbols used in the above summaries of the various aspects of the invention are only for the convenience of the reader and should not be interpreted as limiting the scope of the invention. More generally, it is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are merely exemplary of the invention and are intended to provide an overview or framework for understanding the nature and character of the invention.
Additional features and advantages of the invention are set forth in the detailed description which follows, and in part will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art from that description or recognized by practicing the invention as described herein. The accompanying drawings are included to provide a further understanding of the invention, and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification. It is to be understood that the various features of the invention disclosed in this specification and in the drawings can be used in any and all combinations.
Laser scoring and separation as conventionally practiced typically employs a carbon dioxide laser operating at a wavelength of 10.6 μm. At this wavelength the absorption of oxide glasses can exceed 105-106 m−1, which makes the effective penetration depth of CO2 radiation less than 1-10 μm. Thus, formation of a full body vent (a crack extending through the entire thickness of the glass sheet) during a single step laser separation process employing a CO2 laser mainly relies on thermal conductivity of the heat below the glass surface, which is a relatively slow process. Therefore, high surface absorption and thermal conductivity of the glass are two fundamental factors that determine the process window and limit the separation speed.
To reach the required tensile stress to form a vent, the power density of the laser beam should be high enough to provide the needed temperature differential at the surface of the glass. However, if the power density is too high, the energy delivered to each point on the glass surface along the separation line during the exposure can cause ablation or evaporation of the glass. Such high power densities can also result in high levels of residual stress both at the edge of a separated sub-piece and within the area of glass adjacent to it. On the other hand, if the exposure time is short (when the separation speed is high), the energy delivered to the glass may be insufficient to heat the glass below the surface and create a vent that extends through the entire thickness of the sheet (full body separation).
In accordance with embodiments of the present invention, the above challenges are addressed using a solution that completely separates glass sheets (full body separation), at relatively high speeds, with low levels of residual stress, including glass sheets composed of glasses having low coefficients of thermal expansion. That solution involves the use of a single elongated beam with an untruncated length L0 greater than or equal to 200 millimeters. Because of its long length, the beams used in the practice of the invention generally have large ratios of their major to minor axes, e.g., ratios greater than 130, preferably greater than 200, and most preferably greater than 300.
A beam of this type results in a prolonged residence time on the surface of the glass during separating of the glass that enables the creation of a vent that extends completely through the thickness of the sheet at scoring speeds up to about 200 mm/s for a 0.7 mm thick sheet of display-type glass. Moreover, the beam configuration and power distribution of the laser mode can be chosen to keep power density at a relatively low level enabling a consistent separation process without overheating of the glass surface above the strain point of the glass being separated. In particular, for display-type glasses (e.g. glass having a coefficient of thermal expansion between about 30×10−7/° C. and 35×10−7/° C.) the glass should not exceed a temperature more than about 150-200° C. below the strain point of the glass. This represents a clear advantage of the method since it means that relatively high separation speeds can be used without the generation of high levels of residual stress, and further, without the need for secondary process steps, as would be needed if mere scoring of the glass was generated. In addition, it has been found that the tensile stress generated during the separation can be maximized by adjusting the relative position of the cooling zone and the trailing edge of the beam. This allows the temperature differential along the surface of the glass to be increased while holding the maximum temperature at the surface of the glass well below the strain point of the glass. It should be noted that glass sheets having thicknesses less than 0.7 mm can be separated much faster, e.g. speeds exceeding about 200 mm/s, and even exceeding about 500 mm/s.
In accordance with certain embodiments, full body laser separation is performed using a non-symmetrical laser beam, e.g., a beam that has been truncated on just one end. Preferably, the beam has a size (length) and power density that can be varied to accommodate different glass types and/or processing conditions (e.g., laser beam traverse speeds), although beams having a fixed size and power density can be used in the practice of the invention if desired, e.g., in connection with a dedicated sheet separating station used for a single type and thickness of glass.
To create and propagate a laser vent at a given speed, each point on the glass surface should experience the same thermal history determined by the following parameters: laser power and distribution of the power density within the laser beam; heating speed; maximum glass surface temperature achieved during heating; and quenching efficiency and location of the quenching zone. In general terms, the separation methods of the present invention balance the system's process parameters such that a variation of one parameter is compensated by a variation of one or more other parameters so as to maintain essentially the same desirable thermal history for each point on the glass surface along the separation line.
For any given type of glass and separation speed, the invention achieves relatively high speed, full body separation with low residual stress by meeting the following conditions:
The application of these principles can be best understood by considering
Separation of the glass sheet can be described in terms of the tensile stress σ produced in the glass during the separation process. This tensile stress is proportional to α*E*ΔT, where α is the glass' linear thermal expansion coefficient (CTE), E is the glass' modulus of elasticity, and ΔT is a measure of the temperature difference on the surface of the glass between the portion of the surface located under the laser beam and the portion located under the cooling nozzle.
To produce a vent, the generated tensile stress must be higher than the molecular bonds of the glass. The lower the CTE and modulus of elasticity of the glass, the lower the generated tensile stress and, consequently, the lower the traverse speed of the laser and cooling area for a given set of conditions. For a given α*E product, tensile stress σ can be increased by heating the glass to a higher temperature. However, overheating of the glass close to or above its strain point causes glass ablation and entails the formation of irreversible high residual stress in the glass, which deteriorates the quality of the edge of a sub-piece, reduces its strength and makes for inconsistent operation of the separation process.
To address these problems, studies were undertaken in which vent depth as a function of laser traverse speed for a glass sheet having a nominal thickness of 0.7 mm was measured. The data, shown in
Increases in traverse speed, in general, lead to reductions in vent depth and make the separation of the glass sheet into two sub-pieces unreliable. A major drawback of existing laser score and snap techniques has been the limited exposure (or residence) time provided by “short” laser beams (i.e. laser beams having a small footprint on the surface of the glass). The exposure time becomes progressively short (e.g., ˜100-120 ms for beam lengths shorter than 50-60 mm) when the scoring speed approaches or exceeds 500 mm/s.
As discussed above, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, an elongated beam having an untruncated length L0 greater than or equal to 200 millimeters is used to perform the separation in a single step. This enables heat transfer deep into the glass without overheating the glass surface at the traverse speeds described herein. The vent depth created by such a beam can then be made to extend completely through the glass thickness. Although there is no theoretical limit on the length of the laser beam used in the practice of the invention, based on cost and other practical considerations, L0 will typically be about 200 mm, although longer beams can be used if desired. If high separation speed is not required, then beam length of about 100 mm can be used.
The laser beam will typically be produced by a CO2 laser, although other types of lasers can be used if desired. To achieve an L0 value of 200 millimeters or longer, the beam will typically be passed through a beam expander and then elongated using cylindrical optics. For purposes of the present invention, the L0 value for an untruncated beam is determined using the 1/e2 definition of beam length of the ISO 11146 standard. That is, the boundaries of the laser beam are defined as the locations at which beam intensity has fallen to 1/e2 of its peak value Ipeak. According to this definition approximately 86% of the total beam energy is transmitted through the defined boundaries.
In one experiment, a sheet of Corning Eagle XG™ glass having a nominal thickness of 0.7 mm was separated in accordance with methods of the present invention, and the stress at the separated edges of the sheet was measured as a function of the distance from the edge. The sheet was separated at a speed of 150 mm/s using a CO2 laser having an untruncated elongated footprint on the sheet of about 200 mm and a power density at the surface of the sheet of about 1.0 W/mm2. The data is shown in
Separation of glass sheets performed according to embodiment of the present invention have been shown to produce edge surfaces superior to score and snap edges, with virtually no hackle present, and edge surfaces perpendicular to the major surfaces (e.g. major surface 10) of the sheet within 0.3 degrees of perpendicular.
As discussed above, in accordance with the invention, the maximum temperature Tmax at the surface of the glass surface during scoring is kept well below the strain point Tstrain of the glass, i.e., the temperature at which the glass has a viscosity of 1013.5 Pa·s (1014.5 poise). Preferably, Tmax≦Tstrain−150, more preferably, Tmax≦Tstrain−200, and in certain circumstances Tmax≦Tstrain−250, where Tmax and Tstrain are in ° C. The glass temperature can be measured in various ways, a preferred procedure being through the use of a thermal imaging (thermal vision) camera.
By controlling Tmax to be substantially below the glass strain point, the amount of residual stress in the glass after separation is reduced. Preferably, the peak residual stress in sub-pieces produced from the glass sheet is less than or equal to 100 psi and most preferably, less than or equal to 50 psi. The peak residual stress in a separated sheet is preferably measured using a birefringence technique.
As will be evident from the foregoing, the invention can be practiced using an untruncated beam but may employ a beam which has been truncated on one end, i.e., its trailing end closest to (proximal to) the coolant area. The truncation can be performed using a shield specifically constructed for this purpose. Alternatively, a portion of the nozzle assembly used to apply coolant to the sheet can be positioned to intercept and thus truncate the trailing part of the beam.
It should be noted that the degree of beam blockage in accordance with the present invention preferably does not exceed approximately 20% of the total beam length. Also, the degree of beam blockage is preferably selected depending on the desired traverse speed. Moreover, when the cooling nozzle assembly is used to perform beam blockage, selection of a desired position of the coolant zone within the beam leads to a different degree of truncation of the beam while at the same time holding constant the distance from the rear edge of the beam to the front edge of the cooled area.
In some embodiments, separation of the glass sheet can be improved by inducing a small tensile stress in the glass sheet at the surface on which the laser beam impinges, such as by bending, during the traverse of the laser beam.
Although specific embodiments of the invention have been described and illustrated, it is to be understood that modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, although the invention has been discussed and illustrated in terms of the separation of LCD glass having a thickness of 0.7 mm using a CO2 laser operating at 10.6 μm, the invention can be applied to other types of glasses and can use other types of lasers operating at different wavelengths if desired.
A variety of other modifications which do not depart from the scope and spirit of the invention will be evident to persons of ordinary skill in the art from the disclosure herein. The following claims are intended to cover the specific embodiments set forth herein as well as such modifications, variations, and equivalents.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3839005 | Meyer | Oct 1974 | A |
| 4467168 | Morgan et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
| 4468534 | Boddicker | Aug 1984 | A |
| 5084604 | Dekker et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5138131 | Nishikawa et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5609284 | Kondratenko | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5776220 | Allaire et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5916460 | Imoto et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5984159 | Ostendarp et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6112967 | Ostendarp et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6211488 | Hoekstra et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6236446 | Izumi et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6252197 | Hoekstra et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6259058 | Hoekstra | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6300593 | Powell | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6327875 | Allaire et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6407360 | Choo et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6420678 | Hoekstra | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6512196 | Yoon et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6541730 | Nam et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6563082 | Terada et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6590181 | Choo et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6653210 | Choo et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6713720 | Jeon et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6723952 | Choo et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6734391 | Jeon | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6744009 | Xuan et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6770842 | Nam et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6787732 | Xuan et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6800831 | Hoetzel | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6870129 | Hauer et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6894249 | Hauer et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 8011207 | Abramov et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 20020046997 | Nam et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020060210 | Terada et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020170896 | Choo et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020195434 | Nam et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030062348 | Jeon et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030146197 | Jeon | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030209528 | Choo et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040020960 | Hauer et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040056008 | Choo et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040232116 | Yamazaki et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040232124 | Nagai et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040251290 | Kondratenko | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040262273 | Nam et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050029239 | Matsumoto et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20060011593 | Fukuyo et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060021978 | Alexeev et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060148213 | Iwamura et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060151450 | You et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060209224 | Nakanishi | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20070062921 | Karube et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070151962 | Doll et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070158317 | Brix et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070170161 | Yoo et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070241085 | Hiroya et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20100078417 A1 | Apr 2010 | US |
