Facsimile letter dated Jun. 7, 1994 from Howard L. Milhench, attorney for VISX Corporation, to the European patent office containing applicant's preliminary response to an opposition by Summit Technology, Inc. to European patent application No. 86307420.9-2305/021842. |
Paper in European patent application Nos. 86307420.9-2305/0218427 and 87306826.6-2302/0257836 titled "Affidavit of Stephen L. Trokel" Sworn on Dec. 5, 1995. |
Form EPO 2042 dated Dec. 29, 1995 having reference No. J.17848 in European patent application No. 86307420.9-2302/0218427. |
Facsimile letter dated Feb. 8, 1995 from Howard L. Milhench, attorney for VISX Corporation, to the European patent office containing applicant's preliminary response to (1) an opposition by Firma Carl Zeiss and (2) an opposition by Summit Technology, Inc. to European patent application No. 87306826.6-2212/0257836. |
Facsimile letter dated Jun. 2, 1994 from Howard L. Wibench, attorney for VISX Corporation, to the European patent office containing VISX's preliminary response to (1) an opposition by Firma Carl Zeiss and (2) an opposition by Summit Technology, Inc. to European patent application No. 87310283.4-0274205. |
Letter dated Sep. 22, 1994 from Howard L. Milhench, attorney for VISX Corporation, to the European patent office containing applicant's preliminary response to (1) an opposition by Firma Carl Zeiss and (2) an opposition by Summit Technology, Inc. to European patent application No. 87310283.4-0274205. |
Facsimile message dated Dec. 23, 1991 from Howard L. Milhench, attorney for VISX Corporation, to the European patent ofice containing VISX's observations regarding (1) an opposition by Synthelabo, Paris (FR) and (2) an opposition by Zeiss, Oberkochen (DE) to European patent application No. 896304315.4-2305. |
Rebuttal Expert of Dr. Michael S. Feld Re: Validity; Civil Action No. 95-524-SLR; United States District Court for the District of Delaware; Dec. 30, 1996. |
Report of James H. Brannon Pursuant to Federal rule of Civil Procedure 26; Civil Action No. 95-524 SLR; United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Dec. 9, 1996. |
Rebuttal Expert Report of Dr. Jack Feinberg Re: Validity; Civil Action No. 95-524-SLR; United States District Court for the District of Delaware; Dec. 23, 1996. |
Deposition of Alain Azema; Civil Action no. 95-524-SLR; United States District Court for the District of Delaware; Sep. 17, 1996. |
Rebuttal Expert Report of Roger F. Steinert, M.D. Re: Validity; Civil Action No. 95-524-SLR; United States District Court for the District of Delaware; Dec. 30, 1996. |
"Excimer Laser Surgery of the Cornea" by Trokel et al.; Am. J. Opthalmology; vol. 96; No. 6; Dec. 1983; pp. 710-715. |
"Response to the Corneal Epithelium to KrF Excimer Laser Pulses" by Tabouda et al; Health Physics vol. 40, May 1981 pp. 677-683. |
"An Extreem Sensitivity in the Corneal Epithelusa to For WARF Excime Laser Pulses" Toboda et al Aerospace Medical Assoc. 1981 Meeting San Antonio TX (Taboda et al (1981)). |