The present disclosure relates, generally, to lasers and, more particularly, to lasers with a setback aperture.
Slab waveguide resonators (like that illustrated in
Additionally, due to a relatively small cross-sectional dimension in the waveguide direction, the laser beam has a relatively small cross-sectional profile at the aperture 13. As such, the laser beam has a high energy density that can be damaging to an output window positioned adjacent the front mirror 12. Some prior art lasers have utilized a tapered waveguide, either internal to the laser's gain medium (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 6,614,826) or external to the laser's gain medium (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 8,295,319), leading up to the aperture 13 to address the above issues.
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
Illustrative embodiments of the invention are described in the following enumerated clauses. Any combination of the following clauses is contemplated, along with any applicable combination with the embodiments described in the Detailed Description of Illustrative Embodiments below.
1. A laser comprising front and rear resonator mirrors, an output window positioned near the front resonator mirror, and a plurality of waveguide walls extending between the front and rear resonator mirrors and extending between the rear resonator mirror and an aperture defined by the plurality of waveguide walls, such that a laser beam formed between the front and rear resonator mirrors will propagate in free-space between the aperture and the output window so that a first cross-sectional profile of the laser beam at the aperture will be different than a second cross-sectional profile of the laser beam at the output window.
2. The laser of clause 1, wherein the front and rear resonator mirrors, the output window, and the plurality of waveguide walls cooperate to form an unstable slab waveguide resonator.
3. The laser of clause 2, wherein the laser beam exits the resonator at the aperture.
4. The laser of any one of clauses 1-3, wherein the plurality of waveguide walls are formed of an electrically insulating material.
5. The laser of clause 4, wherein the electrically insulating material comprises a ceramic.
6. The laser of any one of clauses 1-5, wherein the front and rear resonator mirrors, the output window, and a body comprising the plurality of waveguide walls cooperate to form an airtight enclosure for a laser gas.
7. The laser of clause 6, further comprising electrodes positioned outside of the airtight enclosure.
8. The laser of clause 7, wherein the electrodes are positioned so as to excite only a portion of the laser gas.
9. The laser of clause 8, wherein the electrodes are positioned so as to excite only the portion of the laser gas between the front and rear resonator mirrors.
10. The laser of clause 8, wherein the electrodes are positioned so as to not excite the portion of the laser gas between the rear resonator mirror and the output window.
11. The laser of clause 6, wherein the body further comprises a plurality of non-waveguide walls extending between the aperture and the output window.
12. The laser of clause 11, wherein a gap between the plurality of non-waveguide walls is greater than a gap between the plurality of waveguide walls.
13. The laser of any one of clauses 1-3, 6, 11, and 12, wherein the plurality of waveguide walls are formed of an electrically conductive material.
14. The laser of clause 13, wherein the electrically conductive material comprises a metal or metal alloy.
15. The laser of clause 13 or clause 14, wherein the plurality of waveguide walls function as electrodes of the laser.
16. The laser of any preceding clause, wherein the output window comprises a corrective lens.
17. The laser of any one of clauses 1-15, further comprising a corrective lens, wherein the output window is positioned between the corrective lens and the aperture.
18. The laser of clause 17, wherein the corrective lens is positioned adjacent the output window.
19. The laser of clause 17, wherein a first distance between the aperture and the output window is larger than a second distance between the output window and the corrective lens.
20. The laser of any preceding clause, wherein the first cross-sectional profile is generally elliptical and the second cross-sectional profile is generally round.
The concepts described in the present disclosure are illustrated by way of example and not by way of limitation in the accompanying figures. For simplicity and clarity of illustration, elements illustrated in the figures are not necessarily drawn to scale. Further, where considered appropriate, reference labels have been repeated among the figures to indicate corresponding or analogous elements. The Detailed Description of Illustrative Embodiments below particularly refers to the accompanying figures in which:
While the concepts of the present disclosure are susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described herein in detail. It should be understood, however, that there is no intent to limit the concepts of the present disclosure to the particular forms disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives consistent with the present disclosure and the appended claims.
References in the description to “one embodiment,” “an embodiment,” “an illustrative embodiment,” etc., indicate that the embodiment described may include a particular feature, structure, or characteristic, but every embodiment may or may not necessarily include that particular feature, structure, or characteristic. Moreover, such phrases are not necessarily referring to the same embodiment. Further, when a particular feature, structure, or characteristic is described in connection with an embodiment, it is submitted that it is within the knowledge of one skilled in the art to effect such feature, structure, or characteristic in connection with other embodiments whether or not explicitly described.
Lasers according to the present disclosure are able to address the issues of slab waveguide resonators discussed above, without the need for either a tapered waveguide or external optics. Instead, lasers according to the present disclosure utilize a waveguide resonator with a setback aperture. One illustrative example of such a laser is shown in
Like the lasers of
In the illustrative embodiment shown in
In contrast to the lasers of
In some embodiments, the waveguide walls 8, 9 may be absent in the portion of the resonator between the setback aperture 13 and the output window 14. In other embodiments, the walls 8, 9 may be present in the portion of the resonator between the setback aperture 13 and the output window 14, but there may be a greater gap between the walls 8, 9 in that portion than in the remainder of the resonator. In either case, the laser beam is not waveguided in the portion of the resonator between the setback aperture 13 and the output window 14 but is instead allowed to propagate in free-space, not interacting with any walls that may be present.
As illustrated in
It is contemplated that, in some embodiments of lasers according to the present disclosure (such as those having ceramic waveguide walls 8, 9), electrodes of the laser may be positioned outside the waveguide walls 8, 9 so as to excite only a desired portion of the laser gas 10. One illustrative embodiment of a laser with such an electrode configuration is shown in
The entire disclosures of U.S. Pat. No. 8,422,528 and U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2016/0233640 are incorporated by reference herein. Any of the lasers described in the present application may possess any of the features described in the foregoing references (except to the extent such features are inconsistent with the disclosure of the present application).
While certain illustrative embodiments have been described in detail in the figures and the foregoing description, such an illustration and description is to be considered as exemplary and not restrictive in character, it being understood that only illustrative embodiments have been shown and described and that all changes and modifications that come within the spirit of the disclosure are desired to be protected. There exist a plurality of advantages of the present disclosure arising from the various features of the apparatus, systems, and methods described herein. It will be noted that alternative embodiments of the apparatus, systems, and methods of the present disclosure may not include all of the features described, yet still benefit from at least some of the advantages of such features. Those of ordinary skill in the art may readily devise their own implementations of the apparatus, systems, and methods that incorporate one or more of the features of the present disclosure.
This application is a national stage entry made under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of PCT International Application No. PCT/US2017/052414, filed on Sep. 20, 2017, which claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/397,155, filed on Sep. 20, 2016. The entire disclosure of each of the foregoing applications is incorporated herein by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2017/052414 | 9/20/2017 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/057567 | 3/29/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3950712 | Chenausky et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
4169251 | Laakmann | Sep 1979 | A |
4373202 | Laakmann et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4393506 | Laakmann et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4455658 | Sutter | Jun 1984 | A |
4493087 | Laakman et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4596018 | Gruber et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4719639 | Tulip | Jan 1988 | A |
4720691 | Rammos | Jan 1988 | A |
4805182 | Laakmann | Feb 1989 | A |
4837772 | Laakmann | Jun 1989 | A |
4939738 | Opower | Jul 1990 | A |
5008894 | Laakmann | Apr 1991 | A |
5048048 | Nishimae et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5065405 | Laakmann et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5155739 | Mefferd | Oct 1992 | A |
5216689 | Gardner et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5220577 | Opower | Jun 1993 | A |
5272714 | Chen et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5307358 | Scheps | Apr 1994 | A |
5386431 | Tulip | Jan 1995 | A |
5409314 | Laakmann | Apr 1995 | A |
5592504 | Cameron | Jan 1997 | A |
5602865 | Laakmann | Feb 1997 | A |
5646765 | Laakmann et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5661746 | Sukhman et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5754575 | Sukhman et al. | May 1998 | A |
5805754 | Zhang | Sep 1998 | A |
5822354 | Vitruk | Oct 1998 | A |
5881087 | Sukhman et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5892782 | Vitruk et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5953360 | Vitruk et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6195379 | Jones et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198758 | Broderick et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6198759 | Broderick et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6599034 | Tatoh et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6603794 | Bethel et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6614826 | Bethel et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6856639 | Dutov et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7177057 | Morrow et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7460577 | Morrow | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7480323 | Murray | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7570683 | Broderick et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7889775 | Hua | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8295319 | Morrow et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8422528 | Morrow et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
10404030 | Morrow et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
20030010420 | Morrow | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030048826 | Bethel et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20050057640 | Clarke et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050105581 | Seguin et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050175054 | Shackleton et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060029116 | Shackleton et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20070041418 | Laughman et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20080101430 | Morrow | May 2008 | A1 |
20080123707 | Murray | May 2008 | A1 |
20080124433 | Yelden et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080144675 | Spinelli et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080285607 | Murray | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080285613 | Murray | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090110016 | Markillie | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20160233640 | Morrow | Aug 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101420101 | Apr 2009 | CN |
19734641 | Feb 1999 | DE |
2477106 | Jul 2011 | GB |
3479197 | Dec 2003 | JP |
9939410 | Aug 1999 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2017/052414, completed Nov. 10, 2017 (dated Oct. 11, 2017), 11 pages. |
Synrad, Inc., Firestar V-Series CO2 Lasers Overview, 1 page, www.synrad.com/vseries/index.htm. |
Synrad, Inc., Firestart V-Series 30 & 40 CO2 Lasers, 4 pages. |
Synrad, Inc., 30 Watt CO2 Laser with Its Compact Size, Near-Perfect Beam Quality and Fast Rise Times, the Synrad v30 CO2 Laser Provides Users with the Ultimate Low Power CO2 Laser Tool, 1 page, www.synrad.com/vseries/v30.htm. |
Synrad, Inc., Firestart Oem v30 Reference Guide, Version 3.2, Jun. 2012, 36 pages. |
Synrad, Inc., Synrad's Firestar v40, 2 pages, www.synrad.com/vseries/v40.htm. |
Synrad, Inc., Synrad's Firestar v40 Version D Operator's Manual, Version 3.1, Sep. 2010, 106 pages. |
Tamanuki et al., “High Power and Narrow Lateral Far-Field Divergence 1.5 m Eye-Safe Pulsed Laser Diodes with Flared Waveguide,” Opt. and Quantum Electron., vol. 28, pp. 513-517 (1996). |
European Patent Office, Supplemental European Search Report for related EP 17853776.7, dated Apr. 17, 2020, 6 pages. |
China National Intellectual Property Administration, First Office Action for related CN 201780064792.0, dated Jun. 16, 2020, 12 pages (with translation). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190267768 A1 | Aug 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62397155 | Sep 2016 | US |