A large and growing population of users is enjoying entertainment through the consumption of digital media items, such as music, movies, images, electronic books, and so on. The users employ various electronic devices to consume such media items. Among these electronic devices are electronic book readers, cellular telephones, personal digital assistant (PDA), portable media players, tablet computers, netbooks, and the like.
One particular device that is gaining in popularity is the dedicated electronic book (“eBook”) reader device, which attempts to mimic the experience of reading a conventional book through display of electronic information on one or more electronic displays. As the quantity of available media content continues to grow, along with increasing proliferation of such dedicated devices to consume that media content, finding ways to enhance user experience continues to be a priority. As eBook reader devices continue to evolve, there remains a need for improving a reader's ability to relate comfortably with the eBooks, and begin to feel as though he is picking up the book itself, rather than a generic electronic device.
The detailed description is described with reference to the accompanying figures. In the figures, the left-most digit(s) of a reference number identifies the figure in which the reference number first appears. The use of the same reference numbers in different figures indicates similar or identical components or features.
This disclosure describes last screen rendering techniques to enhance user experience with a dedicated handheld electronic book (“eBook”) reader device. The eBook reader device is designed to allow users to read or otherwise consume electronic content (e.g., text, graphics, audio, multimedia, and the like), such as that found in eBooks (e.g., books, magazines, newspapers, periodicals, or other types of electronic documents), RSS feeds, audio books, and the like. The eBook reader device described herein employs electronic paper (“ePaper”) display technology. A characteristic of ePaper display technology is that the display is bi-stable, meaning that it is capable of holding text or other rendered images even when very little or no power is supplied to the display. Thus, the last screen image rendered on the display can be maintained and visible for very long periods of time, such as days or weeks.
The techniques described herein enhance user experience by enabling the eBook reader device to render, as the last screen image to remain visible after the user ceases using the device, an image that conveys to the user some meaningful association with a content item. For instance, in the case of eBooks, the eBook reader device renders a representation of the book cover as the last screen image. In other scenarios, the eBook reader device determines, based on a schedule or past user behavior, which content item the user is likely to consume next. Based on this determination, the eBook reader device renders, as the last screen image that persists for long periods, a representation of that content item that the user is likely to consume next. In this manner, the eBook reader device projects an identity of a content item, rather than as a generic electronic device.
For discussion purposes, the techniques are described in the context of an eBook reader device used to facilitate reading of electronic books. However, the features discussed below may be applied to other content items, such as audio books, and so forth.
Illustrative Ebook Reader Device
The display 102 may further include touch screen capabilities that allow user input through contact or gesturing relative to the display. For convenience only, the display 102 is shown in a generally rectangular configuration. However, it is understood that the display 102 may be implemented in any shape, and may have any ratio of height to width. Also, for stylistic or design purposes, the touch-screen display 102 may be curved or otherwise non-linearly shaped.
The eBook reader device 100 also has a keyboard 104 beneath the display 102 and one or more actuatable controls 106 that may have dedicated or assigned operations. For instance, the actuatable controls 106 may include page turning buttons, a joystick, navigational keys, a power on/off button, selection keys, joystick, touchpad, and so on.
In
The eBook reader device 100 has various internal electronic components and software modules, which include a last screen rendering module 110 that is responsible for rendering the final image presented on the display 102 after the user ceases reading the eBook. The last screen rendering module 110 may include a timer to track a time period from the last user input. When a sufficient time period has lapsed, the module 110 assumes that the user is likely to have ceased reading the eBook. In response, the last screen rendering module 110 renders one more screen image before entering a dormant or sleep mode. The last screen image is chosen to convey something meaningful about the eBook. In one implementation, the last screen image is a representation of the book cover.
In
As an alternative to time lapse, the last screen rendering module 110 may further detect when the user proactively inputs a command to transition the eBook reader device 100 from an active state to a non-active state (e.g., sleep, rest, lower power level, etc.). The user may, for example, input a command using a touch screen 102 (if available), the keyboard 104, or actuatable controls 106 to “power down” or otherwise force the device 100 into a non-active state. In response, the last screen rendering module 110 may then convert the current page 108 with the book cover image 112.
In another implementation, the last screen rendering module 110 may further render a screen image of an eBook that the user is likely to consume next. The last screen rendering module 110 may allow a user to schedule when it is likely to be reading certain works. For instance, a student may enter her class schedule, and the last screen rendering module 110 renders images of book covers of the class texts the student is likely to read during the course of the day. Alternatively, the last screen rendering module 110 may anticipate the next likely work based on past user behavior. For instance, the user may exhibit a preference for historical novels in the evening and work-related books during the day.
In
The memory 204 may be used to store any number of functional components that are executable on the processing unit 202, as well as data and content items that are rendered by the eBook reader device 102. Thus, the memory 204 may store an operating system 206 and an eBook storage database to store one or more content items 208, such as eBooks and audio books. The memory may further include a memory portion designated as an immediate page memory to temporarily store one or more pages of an electronic book. The pages held by the immediate page memory are placed therein a short period before a next page request is expected.
A user interface module 210 may also be provided in memory 204 and executed on the processing unit 202 to facilitate user operation of the device 100. The UI module 210 may provide menus and other navigational tools to facilitate selection and rendering of the content items 208. The UI module 210 may further include a browser or other application that facilitates access to sites over a network, such as websites or online merchants.
A content presentation application 212 renders the content items 208. The content presentation application 212 may be implemented as various applications depending upon the content items. For instance, the application 212 may be an electronic book reader application for rending electronic books, or an audio player for playing audio books, or a video player for playing video, and so forth.
The last screen rendering module 110 may also be implemented as a software module stored in memory 204 and executable on the processing unit 202. The last screen rendering module 110 detects screen conversion events, such as time lapses, scheduled items, events set based on user behavior, and so forth. Upon detecting a screen conversion event, the last screen rendering module 110 directs the display 102 to present either (1) a visible representation associated with a content item that the user was last interacting with, or (2) a visible representation associated with a different content item. In the case of electronic books, the last screen rendering module 110 may render images of covers associated with the electronic books. In this manner, the eBook reader device is left standing with a screen depicting the cover of the last book that the reader was reading, or of the next book that the reader is likely to begin reading. Thus, the eBook reader device may be identified more by the book's cover than as an electronic device. Since the ePaper display can last for days or weeks or maybe even months, the cover image may remain visible on the device for long periods until the user once again begins interacting with the device.
The last screen rendering module 110 may implement different mechanisms for determining when to render the last screen image. Illustrated mechanisms include a timer 214, a schedule 216, and a behavior monitor 218.
The timer 214 is configured to detect when the user ceases interacting with the eBook reader device 100 for a threshold period of time. The threshold period may be user configurable. In one implementation, the threshold period is at least five minutes, although longer or shorter durations are possible. When the timer 214 reaches the threshold period, a screen conversion event is generated, causing the last screen rendering module 110 to render a different image on the display 102 that will be visibly persist until the user once again begins interacting with the eBook reader device 100. In the context of electronic books, the last screen rendering module 110 converts the screen image to that of the book's cover, rather than a particular page.
The schedule 216 allows the user to schedule, expressly or indirectly, one or more screen conversion events. Generally, the scheduler 216 enables the user to set a particular time of day, and/or day of week, as a screen conversion event in which to convert the display to an image that is associated with the same content item or another one. For instance, the user may schedule reading periods in advance of school classes, such that at each scheduled event, the eBook reader device 100 displays the cover image of eBook associated with the next class text.
There are different ways to implement the scheduler 216. In one implementation, the scheduler 216 offers a user interface that allows the user to define scheduled events in which to cause a screen conversion. In another implementation, the scheduler 216 works in the background to coordinate with a calendaring application (not shown) that resides on the eBook reader device or on an external computing system with which the eBook reader device communicates. The scheduler 216 imports from the calendaring application one or more scheduled events pertaining to the consumption of content items on the eBook reader device. Moreover, this information may be pushed to the eBook reader device from a remote location over a network, such as a wireless network. For instance, the user may maintain a schedule or other events at an online service (e.g., computing cloud or service) that sends such events to the eBook reader device, and these events are used by the last screen rendering module 110 to convert the display screen.
The behavior monitor 218 establishes screen conversion events based on the user's behavior. Over time, the behavior monitor 218 monitors user behavior during interaction with the eBook reader device. As part of this monitoring, the behavior monitor 218 observes which content items the user consumes at different times of day or days of the week. The behavior monitor 218 may identify, for example, one or more eBooks that the user may likely want to read based on past behavior. For example, the behavior monitor 218 may learn from observed patterns that the user reads the Bible each morning between 7:00 am and 8:00 am, and that the user tends to read a book on architecture every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, between 10:00 am and noon, in advance of a class at college. Further, the user may be found to listen to audio versions of science fiction novels most evenings, after 9:00 pm.
The behavior monitor 218 then establishes screen conversion events around the observed activities, and associates one or more content items that the users are likely to consume with screen conversion event. For instance, the behavior monitor 218 may set a screen conversion event for every morning at, say, 6:45 am (in advance of the usual behavior of 7:00 am to 8:00 am), and associate the Bible with this event. When the screen rendering module 110 detects this screen conversion event, it causes the display to render a cover image of the Bible in anticipation of the user picking up the eBook reader device to read the Bible at the regular time.
As shown in both
In the same or different implementations, the display 102 may be a flexible display and further include a touch sensitive membrane, film, or other form of sensing material. The flexible display may be positioned, for example, above a touch sensor(s). The touch sensor(s) may be a resistive touch sensitive film. The flexible display may also include a protective layer made of a flexible material such as plastic. The flexible display may also include a flexible backplane layer. The backplane may also be made of a flexible material, such as plastic, metal, glass or a polymer based material. A flexible backplane may be bendable, rollable, light-weight, etc. In one configuration, the flexible backplane is a matrix backplane on a plastic substrate.
The eBook reader device 100 may further be equipped with various input/output (I/O) components 220. Such components may include various user interface controls (e.g., buttons, joystick, keyboard, etc.), audio speaker, microphone or audio input, connection ports, and so forth.
One or more communication interfaces 222 are provided to facilitate communication with external, remote computing sources over various networks or with other local devices. Content (e.g., eBooks, magazines, audio books, etc.), program modules, and screen conversion events, may be transferred to the eBook reader device 100 via the communication interfaces(s) 222. The communication interface(s) 222 support both wired and wireless connection to various networks, such as cellular networks, radio, WiFi networks, short range networks (e.g., Bluetooth), IR, and so forth. The communication connection(s) 222 support both wired and wireless communications with various types of networks, including the Internet. For example, the eBook reader device 100 may be equipped with a radio frequency transceiver to facilitate wireless communication over a wireless network. The device may further include a communication connection that facilitates communication with other devices via, for example, Bluetooth, radio frequency, or infrared connection(s). The communication connection(s) 222 are one example of communication media. Communication media may typically be embodied by computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data in a modulated data signal, such as a carrier wave or other transport mechanism, and includes any information delivery media.
The eBook reader device 102 also includes a battery and power control unit 224. The power control unit operatively controls an amount of power, or electrical energy, consumed by the eBook reader device. Actively controlling the amount of power consumed by the reader device may achieve more efficient use of electrical energy stored by the battery. The processing unit 202 may supply computing resources to the power control unit 224, which may further include a clock/timer for accurate control of power consumed by the eBook reader device 100.
The eBook reader device 100 may have additional features or functionality. For example, the eBook reader device 100 may also include additional data storage devices (removable and/or non-removable) such as, for example, magnetic disks, optical disks, or tape. The additional data storage media may include volatile and nonvolatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information, such as computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data. In some implementations the eBook reader device 100 may also include a vibrator 226 or other output device for creating a haptic output that is detectable by a user touching the eBook reader device 102. The eBook reader device 100 may further include, in some implementations, an accelerometer 228 for detecting the orientation of the device.
The process 300 begins during normal user interaction with the eBook reader device 100. During this time, the user is consuming content items, such as eBooks, audio books, and so forth. Accordingly, at 302, content from the content item is displayed on the eBook reader device. For example, the current page from an eBook or corresponding text from an audio book may be displayed on the eBook reader device while the user is consuming the content item.
At 304, a screen conversion event is detected. The screen conversion events may be configured in various ways. In one approach, the screen conversion event may be tied to an explicit input from the user who is attempting to “power down” the eBook reader device, as represented by sub-act 304(1). The user may actuate a power control, for instance, that directs the eBook reader device to transition to a non-active state. The last screen rendering module 110 interprets this user input as a screen conversion event. In another approach, the screen conversion event is a timeout period, and hence, the detection occurs when the last screen rendering module 110 senses that the user has ceased engaging with the eBook reader device 100 for a threshold period of time, as represented by sub-act 304(2). In yet another approach, the screen conversion event may be a scheduled event, and hence, the detection occurs when the last screen rendering module 110 detects a previously scheduled event (such as a calendar event), as represented by sub-act 304(3). In still another approach, the screen conversion event may be an event stemming from past user behavior, and hence, the detection occurs when the last screen rendering module 110 monitors past user behavior and sets events based thereon, as represented by sub-act 304(4).
At 306, in response to detecting the screen conversion event, a “last” image associated with the content item or another content item is displayed on the eBook reader device. This last image is an image selected to convey a content item more readily to the user in the future. For instance, for eBooks, the last image may be a book cover, or a special composite that might include, for example, a title, author, last page read, reading statistics, and so forth. For newspapers or magazines, the last image may be a cover page, a graphical title, or any other combination of design elements that convey an identity of the newspaper or magazine. For an audio book, the last image may be that of the audio book cover or a picture of the actor who is reading the book.
While
Screen Conversion Based on Time Lapse
In the first usage scenario, conversion to the last image on the eBook reader device is achieved by detecting a timeout period.
At 402, content from an eBook is displayed on the eBook reader device. For illustration, the screen of the eBook reader device 100 is shown depicting a page from the eBook “Outliers”, by Malcolm Gladwell. This page is being shown on the device 100 at time T1. Recall from above that a “page” as described herein may be understood as a virtual frame of the content, or a visual display window presenting the content to the user. The pages presented on the eBook reader device 100 may not correspond directly to the identical hard pages in the associated physical book. Depending on display capabilities, font size, and other such parameters, any given “page” displayed on the eBook reader device 100 may contain more or less text/graphics than the corresponding hard page.
At 404, a user input to power down the device, or a threshold period of inactivity, following a period in which the user was regularly interacting with the eBook reader device, is detected. This inactivity may be manifest in different ways, including by a failure to receive any input from the user (e.g., page turn request, navigation, adding an annotation, etc.) for a period of time, or by a failure to detect any movement of the device by the accelerometer 228 (if present), or other ways.
At 406, in response to detection of the timeout period, the content on the screen is replaced with a cover image of the eBook. Thus, at time T2, the cover image for the eBook “Outliers” is rendered as the last image on the eBook reader device 100(T2). The cover image remains visible on the screen of the eBook reader device 100(T2) until the user once again begins interacting with the device, or until another screen conversion event occurs (e.g., calendar event or behavior-based event). Thus, the eBook reader device maintains an appearance of the book that the user is presently reading, rather than a generic electronic device.
At 408, it is determined whether the user resumes interaction with the eBook reader device. If not (i.e., the “No” branch from 408), the device remains in rest mode and the cover image persists on the screen. However, once the user resumes interaction with the device (i.e., the “Yes” branch from 408), the eBook reader device returns to the content where the user left off Thus, at time T3, the last page the user was reading is displayed once again, at 410. As illustrated, the eBook reader device 100(T3) shows the same page of the eBook “Outliers” as was being depicted at time T1 when the user stopped reading previously.
Screen Conversion Based on Scheduled Date/time
In another usage scenario, the eBook reader device renders the last image in response to a scheduled conversion event that is based on a date, a time-of-day, or both.
At 502, content from a first eBook is displayed on the eBook reader device. In this illustration, the screen of the eBook reader device 100 depicts a page from the eBook “Outliers”. This page is being shown on the device 100 at time T1.
At 504, a scheduled event is detected during a period of user inactivity. The scheduled event may be entered by the user, or retrieved from querying a calendaring application. Further, the scheduled event may be pushed or retrieved from a remote source, such as a calendaring application on a separate computing device or from an online service available over a network. In this example, suppose the user schedules periodic times to read from the Bible at specified times of the day, and days of the week.
At 506, in response to detecting a scheduled event, the cover image of the eBook associated with the scheduled event is depicted on the screen of the eBook reader device. In our continuing example, at time T2, the cover image for the Bible is shown on the eBook reader device 100(T2). In this example, the second eBook (e.g., Bible) is different from the first eBook (e.g., Outliers) that the user was last reading. However, in situations where the user was last reading the same eBook that is being triggered by the scheduled event, the cover image of the same book will appear.
Screen Conversion Based on User Behavior
In yet another usage scenario, conversion to the last image on the eBook reader device is achieved by observing user behavior and establishing screen conversion events based on the behavior.
At 602, user behavior during interaction with the eBook reader device 100 is monitored over time. In this example, at time T1, the user happens to be reading a page from the eBook “Outliers”.
At 604, one or more screen conversion events are established based on the user behavior. For instance, the user may exhibit a pattern of reading certain genre of eBooks during different times of the day or days of the week. Such patterns may be tracked over time and statistically analyzed. As one simple approach, the device may develop a histogram that tracks the number of times a user reads particular eBooks at predefined times of day (e.g., morning, mid-day, evening) In
At 606, eBooks that the user is likely to read in the various time slots are identified. For instance, the eBook reader device may identify certain school texts that the user is currently consuming and certain novels that the user has not yet completed.
At 608, the identified eBooks are associated with the screen conversion events. Thus, the school texts are associated with a screen conversion event that is set for mid-day, and the novels are associated with the screen conversion event that is set for evening
At 610, a screen conversion event is detected. Suppose, for example, that the screen conversion event is the one set to mid-day.
At 612, in response to detecting this event, the cover image of an eBook that is associated with the screen conversion event is displayed. In this example, since the screen conversion event is at mid-day, the user is likely to read a school text based on past behavior. Thus, at time T2, the cover image of the text “Macro Economics” is rendered on the eBook reader display 100(T2).
Last Image with Progress Information
In addition to rendering a last image, the eBook reader device may further provide progress information that helps the user understand how much of the content item has been consumed, and what remains. The progress information may be in the form of a textual summary, such as how many pages are in the eBook, what page the user last read, the percentage of the book that has been read and/or unread, and so forth. Alternatively, the progress information may be a graphical element that conveys progress through the content item.
These are just three possible examples. Other representations of progress may be implemented, and the progress indicators may be integrated with the cover image, or overlaid as a separate element.
Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described. Rather, the specific features and acts are disclosed as exemplary forms of implementing the claims.
This application claims priority to and is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/567,984, filed on Sep. 28, 2009, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2684955 | Knowles | Sep 1954 | A |
4622627 | Rodriguez et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4985697 | Boulton | Jan 1991 | A |
5418549 | Anderson et al. | May 1995 | A |
5495268 | Pearson et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5499359 | Vijaykumar | Mar 1996 | A |
5517407 | Weiner | May 1996 | A |
5544305 | Ohmaye et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5566098 | Lucente et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5600775 | King et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5623260 | Jones | Apr 1997 | A |
5630159 | Zancho | May 1997 | A |
5640553 | Schultz | Jun 1997 | A |
5659742 | Beattie et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5661635 | Huffman et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5663748 | Huffman et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5696982 | Tanigawa et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5710922 | Alley et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5711922 | O'Brien et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5742905 | Pepe et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5761485 | Munyan | Jun 1998 | A |
5765168 | Burrows | Jun 1998 | A |
5774109 | Winksy et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5813017 | Morris | Sep 1998 | A |
5845278 | Kirsch et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5845301 | Rivette et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5847698 | Reavey et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5892900 | Ginter et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5923861 | Bertram et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5930026 | Jacobson et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5940846 | Akiyama | Aug 1999 | A |
5956048 | Gaston | Sep 1999 | A |
5960411 | Hartman et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5973681 | Tanigawa et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5991439 | Tanaka et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6018575 | Gross et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6034839 | Hamming | Mar 2000 | A |
6037954 | McMahon | Mar 2000 | A |
6041335 | Merritt et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6047189 | Yun et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6049334 | Bates et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6049796 | Siitonen et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6064980 | Jacobi et al. | May 2000 | A |
6073148 | Rowe et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6113394 | Edgar | Sep 2000 | A |
6148340 | Bittinger et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154757 | Krause et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6164974 | Carlile et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6195698 | Lillibridge et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6201771 | Otsuka et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6226642 | Beranek et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233318 | Picard et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6272461 | Meredith et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6300947 | Kanevsky | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308320 | Burch | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6313828 | Chombo | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6331866 | Eisenberg | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331867 | Eberhard et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6335678 | Heutschi | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6351750 | Duga et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6385596 | Wiser et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6401086 | Bruckner | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6401239 | Miron | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6442651 | Crow et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6449627 | Baer et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6457030 | Adams et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6466951 | Birkler et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6484212 | Markowitz et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487669 | Waring | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6493734 | Sachs et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496803 | Ho et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6512497 | Kondo et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6529920 | Arons et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6535857 | Clarke, III et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6542874 | Walker et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6559882 | Kerchner | May 2003 | B1 |
6560699 | Konkle | May 2003 | B1 |
6574658 | Gabber et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6629138 | Lambert et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6631495 | Kato et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6642947 | Feierbach | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6658623 | Schilit et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6685482 | Hopp et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6687878 | Eintracht et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6704733 | Clark et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6712701 | Boylan, III et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6721869 | Senthil | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6724403 | Santoro et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6725227 | Li | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6726487 | Dalstrom | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6735583 | Bjarnestam et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6744891 | Allen | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6744967 | Kaminski et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6801751 | Wood et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6803930 | Simonson | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6804489 | Stuppy et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6829594 | Kitamura | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6847966 | Sommer et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6904449 | Quinones | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6912398 | Domnitz | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6933928 | Lilienthal | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6938076 | Meyer et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6947922 | Glance | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6948135 | Ruthfield et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6953343 | Townshend | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6966029 | Ahern | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6980652 | Braitberg et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6985932 | Glaser et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6992687 | Baird et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6999565 | Delaney et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7007015 | Nayak | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7009596 | Seet et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7010500 | Aarnio | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7010751 | Shneiderman | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7020654 | Najmi | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7020663 | Hay et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7054914 | Suzuki et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7057591 | Hautanen et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7062707 | Knauft et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7071930 | Kondo et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7089292 | Roderick et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7092116 | Calaway | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7103848 | Barsness et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7107533 | Duncan et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7111250 | Hayward et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7130841 | Goel et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7133506 | Smith | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7135932 | Quadir et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7142195 | Northway et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7149776 | Roy et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7165217 | Kondo | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7181502 | Incertis | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7188085 | Pelletier | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7191346 | Abe et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7209888 | Frid-Nielsen et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7216116 | Nilsson et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7237123 | LeVine et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7246118 | Chastain et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7249046 | Katsurabayashi et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7249060 | Ling | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7249324 | Nakamura et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7257577 | Fagin et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7287068 | Eriksson et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7290285 | McCurdy et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7298851 | Hendricks et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7304635 | Seet et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7310629 | Mendelson et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7313759 | Sinisi | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7340436 | Lilge | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7350704 | Barsness et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7355591 | Sugimoto | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7375649 | Gueziec | May 2008 | B2 |
7383505 | Shimizu et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7386480 | Sarig | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7386804 | Ho et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7398244 | Keith | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7401286 | Hendricks et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7414830 | Weinstein et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7454238 | Vinayak et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7461406 | Pelly et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7496767 | Evans | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7506246 | Hollander et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7506356 | Gupta et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7509270 | Hendricks et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7511948 | Hirayama | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7519278 | Ikeda et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7533152 | Stark et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7539478 | Herley et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7558884 | Fuller et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7562032 | Abbosh et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7574653 | Croney et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7631013 | Parsons et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7634429 | Narin et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7656127 | Shutt et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7657459 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7657831 | Donahue | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7680849 | Heller et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7716224 | Reztlaff, II et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7720892 | Healey, Jr. et al. | May 2010 | B1 |
7747949 | Incertis Carro | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7760986 | Beuque | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7788369 | McAllen et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7792756 | Plastina et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7835989 | Hendricks et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7849393 | Hendricks et al. | Dec 2010 | B1 |
7865405 | Hendricks et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7865567 | Hendricks et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7865817 | Ryan et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7870022 | Bous et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7890848 | Bodin et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7900133 | Cragun et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7908628 | Swart et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7920112 | Kurihara et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7920320 | Watson et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8018431 | Zehr et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8117128 | Ishibashi | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8131647 | Siegel et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8161198 | Kikuchi | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8165998 | Semerdzhiev | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8175925 | Rouaix | May 2012 | B1 |
8209623 | Barletta et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8244468 | Scalisi et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8260915 | Ashear | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8312096 | Cohen et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8341210 | Lattyak et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8370196 | Choi et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8417772 | Lin et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8429028 | Hendricks et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8452797 | Paleja et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8510247 | Kane, Jr. et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8601084 | Carlander | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8725565 | Ryan | May 2014 | B1 |
8793575 | Lattyak et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
9268367 | Aguera Y Arcas et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
20010007980 | Ishibashi et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010025302 | Suzuki et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010026287 | Watanabe | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010027450 | Shinoda et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010027478 | Meier et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010036822 | Mead et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010037328 | Pustejovsky et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010039493 | Pustejovsky et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010049623 | Aggarwal et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010050658 | Adams | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010053975 | Kurihara | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020002540 | DeMello et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020010707 | Chang et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020010759 | Hitson et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020012134 | Calaway | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020026443 | Chang et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020035697 | McCurdy et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020046261 | Iwata et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049717 | Routtenberg et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020054059 | Schneiderman | May 2002 | A1 |
20020057286 | Markel et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020059415 | Chang et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020069222 | McNeely | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020069312 | Jones | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087532 | Barritz et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020090934 | Mitchelmore | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091584 | Clark et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020092031 | Dudkiewicz et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020095468 | Sakata | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020101447 | Carro | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020103809 | Starzl et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120635 | Joao | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020123336 | Kamada | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020126140 | Gorbet et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020129012 | Green | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138291 | Vaidyanathan et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138649 | Cartmell et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143822 | Brid et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020147724 | Fries et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165707 | Call | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184319 | Willner et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194474 | Natsuno et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030005002 | Chen et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030009459 | Chastain et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030012216 | Novaes | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018720 | Chang et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030025731 | Chastain et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030028395 | Rodgers et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040970 | Miller | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046233 | Ara et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030052928 | Williams | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030058265 | Robinson et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065642 | Zee | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030069812 | Yuen et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030076513 | Sugimoto et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030090572 | Belz et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093312 | Ukita et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093382 | Himeno et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097354 | Finlay et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097361 | Huang et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105679 | Krishnan et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030110503 | Perkes | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030126123 | Kodama | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030129963 | Nurcahya | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135495 | Vagnozzi | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030152894 | Townshend | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163399 | Harper et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030164844 | Kravitz et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182551 | Frantz et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030190145 | Copperman et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030191737 | Steele et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204496 | Ray et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030212613 | Sarig | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040002943 | Merrill et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040003344 | Lai et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040003398 | Donian et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015467 | Fano | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040023191 | Brown et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030686 | Cardno et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040044723 | Bell et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049743 | Bogward | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040054499 | Starzyk et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040068471 | Kato | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078273 | Loeb et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078757 | Golovchinsky et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040081300 | Takae et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040098350 | Labrou et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040117189 | Bennett | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040120280 | Western | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128359 | Horvitz et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040128539 | Shureih | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040139400 | Allam et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040167822 | Chasen et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040201633 | Barsness et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040205457 | Bent et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210561 | Shen | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040212941 | Haas et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040229194 | Yang | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040237033 | Woolf et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040239703 | Angelica | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040243613 | Pourheidari | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040252692 | Shim et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254013 | Quraishi et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254917 | Brill et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267552 | Gilliam et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040268253 | DeMello et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050021464 | Lindauer et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050022113 | Hanlon | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050044148 | Son et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050044224 | Jun et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050066219 | Hoffman et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050069225 | Schneider et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050069849 | McKinney et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050076012 | Manber et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050088410 | Chaudhri | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091604 | Davis | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050097007 | Alger et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050102618 | Naito | May 2005 | A1 |
20050125222 | Brown et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050132281 | Pan et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138007 | Amitay | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138428 | McAllen et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144221 | Shin et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144895 | Grimes et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050154601 | Halpern et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050156869 | Mori | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050174335 | Kent | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050176438 | Li | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177562 | Raciborski | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177567 | Hughes et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050193330 | Peters | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050195975 | Kawakita | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198070 | Lowry | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050222977 | Zhou et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050223315 | Shimizu et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050228836 | Bacastow et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050250439 | Leslie | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050256822 | Hollingsworth | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050257261 | Shraim et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050262258 | Kohno et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050286212 | Brignone et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050289394 | Arrouye et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004840 | Senda | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020469 | Rast | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060031316 | Forstadius | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060045470 | Poslinski et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060047830 | Nair et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060047844 | Deng | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060048184 | Poslinski et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060053045 | Danielson et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060057960 | Tran | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060061595 | Goede et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069697 | Shraim et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060071754 | Tofts et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060075205 | Martin et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060075444 | Dillen | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060077897 | Kotzin | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060080261 | Christal | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095404 | Adelman et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060098900 | King et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060101328 | Albornoz et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060109242 | Simpkins | May 2006 | A1 |
20060123053 | Scannell, Jr. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060129618 | Maier | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060129924 | Nelson et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060143558 | Albornoz et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060145950 | Tanaka | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060156222 | Chi et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161578 | Siegel et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161635 | Lamkin et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060175983 | Crouse et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060179137 | Jennings, III et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060190489 | Vohariwatt et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060190568 | Patterson | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195431 | Holzgrafe et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060209175 | Cohen et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060236240 | Lebow | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060240799 | Kim et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060250994 | Sasaki et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060253441 | Nelson | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060253458 | Dixon et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060253461 | de Bonet | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060256083 | Rosenberg | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265518 | Owens et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271629 | MacDowell | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060281058 | Mangoaela | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060282797 | Barsness et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070005616 | Hay et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070005757 | Finger et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070014404 | Cha | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016555 | Ito et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070025704 | Tsukazaki et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070039023 | Kataoka | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070050346 | Goel et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055926 | Christiansen et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061335 | Ramer et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061337 | Saito et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061803 | Barrett | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073596 | Alexander et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070076015 | Tanabe | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070078273 | Hirota | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070079236 | Schrier et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070079383 | Gopalakrishnan | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070094285 | Agichtein et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070094351 | Kalish et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070105536 | Tingo, Jr. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070112817 | Danninger | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118533 | Ramer et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070130109 | King et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070136660 | Gurcan et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070136679 | Yang | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070142934 | Boercsoek et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070150456 | Lian et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070162961 | Tarrance et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174545 | Okada et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070185865 | Budzik et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070189719 | Furumachi et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070219983 | Fish | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233562 | Lidwell et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070233692 | Lisa et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070234209 | Williams | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070238077 | Strachar | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070240187 | Beach et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070242225 | Bragg et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250573 | Rothschild | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070282809 | Hoeber et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070283173 | Webb et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288853 | Neil | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080005097 | Kleewein et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080005203 | Bots et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080005664 | Chandra | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080016064 | Sareday et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080016164 | Chandra | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080027933 | Hussam | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080031595 | Cho | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080040233 | Wildman et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080059702 | Lu et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080066155 | Abraham | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082518 | Loftesness | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080082911 | Sorotokin et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080089665 | Thambiratnam et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080113614 | Rosenblatt | May 2008 | A1 |
20080115224 | Jogand-Coulomb et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080120101 | Johnson et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080120280 | Iijima et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080133479 | Zelevinsky et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154908 | Datar et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080163039 | Ryan et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080164304 | Narasimhan et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080165141 | Christie | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080168073 | Siegel et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080208833 | Basmov | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080222552 | Batarseh et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080235351 | Banga et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080243788 | Reztlaff et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080243814 | Gurcan et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080243828 | Reztlaff et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080253737 | Kimura | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080259057 | Brons | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080270930 | Slosar | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080281058 | Araki | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080293450 | Ryan et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080294674 | Rezlaff, II et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080295039 | Nguyen et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080298083 | Watson et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080301820 | Stevens | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090094528 | Gray et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090094540 | Gray et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090181649 | Bull et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090228774 | Matheny et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090231233 | Liberatore | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090241054 | Hendricks | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090263777 | Kohn | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090267909 | Chen et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090296331 | Choy | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090319482 | Norlander et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100023259 | Krumm et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100081120 | Nanjiani et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100095340 | Ei et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100125876 | Craner et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131385 | Harrang et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100156913 | Ortega et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100164888 | Okumura et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100177080 | Essinger | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100188327 | Frid et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100284036 | Ahn et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100328223 | Mockarram-Dorri et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110050591 | Kim et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110050594 | Kim et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110057884 | Gormish et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110069073 | Unger | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110112671 | Weinstein | May 2011 | A1 |
20110191710 | Jang et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110267333 | Sakamoto et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110295926 | Battiston et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120001923 | Weinzimmer et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120016774 | Dicke et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120036431 | Ito et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120041941 | King et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120079372 | Kandekar et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120197998 | Kessel et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120227001 | Gupta et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130014195 | Amira | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130219320 | Seet et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130246157 | Puppin et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1362682 | Aug 2002 | CN |
1841373 | Oct 2006 | CN |
101120358 | Feb 2008 | CN |
1197902 | Apr 2002 | EP |
1842150 | Oct 2007 | EP |
6274493 | Sep 1994 | JP |
07078139 | Mar 1995 | JP |
09179870 | Jul 1997 | JP |
10091640 | Apr 1998 | JP |
11074882 | Mar 1999 | JP |
2000501214 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2001052016 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001052025 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001100702 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2001195412 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2001236358 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2002099739 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2002197079 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002259718 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2002536736 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2003016104 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003122969 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003513384 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003516585 | May 2003 | JP |
2003517158 | May 2003 | JP |
2003186910 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2005056041 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2006011694 | Jan 2006 | JP |
2006107496 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2006129323 | May 2006 | JP |
2006129327 | May 2006 | JP |
2006190114 | Jul 2006 | JP |
2008071334 | Mar 2008 | JP |
2008516297 | May 2008 | JP |
2008527580 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2008197634 | Aug 2008 | JP |
1020020020262 | Mar 2002 | KR |
WO9720274 | Jun 1997 | WO |
WO9720274 | Jun 1997 | WO |
WO0045588 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO0045588 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO0056055 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO0075840 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO0142978 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO0239206 | May 2002 | WO |
WO2004055647 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO2006078728 | Jul 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Homer, et al., “Instant HTML”, Wrox Press, 1997, pp. 76-79. |
Jones, et al., “Development of a Tactile Vest”, IEEE Computer Society, In the Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, Mar. 27-28, 2004, pp. 82-89. |
Translated Japanese Office Action mailed Sep. 2, 2014 for Japanese patent application No. 2011-548210, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,744, 4 pages. |
Translated Japanese Office Action mailed Jan. 14, 2014 for Japanese patent application No. 2011-548210, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,378,979, 4 pages. |
Translated Japanese Office Action mailed Jan. 25, 2011 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2007-552235, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645, 6 pages. |
Translated Japanese Office mailed Oct. 12, 2012 for Japanese patent application No. 2009-544304, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 7,865,817, 6 pages. |
Translated Japanese Office Action mailed Oct. 25, 2011 for Japanese patent application No. 2007-552235, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645, 3 pages. |
Translated Japanese Office Action mailed Nov. 12, 2013 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-501125, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 9 pages. |
Translated Japanese Office Action mailed Dec. 16, 2014 for Japanese patent application No. 2009-544304, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,677, 2 pages. |
Translated Japanese Office Action mailed Dec. 17, 2012 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-509529, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 7 pages. |
Translated Japanese Office Action mailed Dec. 7, 2012 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-501124, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, 6 pages. |
Translated Japanese Office Action mailed Apr. 12, 2013 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-501125, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 5 pages. |
Translated Japanese Office Action mailed May 24, 2013 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-501124, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, 7 pages. |
Translated Japanese Office Action mailed May 31, 2013 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-509529, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 5 pages. |
Translated Japanese Office Action mailed Aug. 23, 2013 for Japanese patent application No. 2009-544304, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 7,865,817, 4 pages. |
Translated Japanese Office Action mailed Aug. 5, 2014 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-501125, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 7 pages. |
Translated Japanese Office Action mailed Sep. 18, 2012 for Japanese patent application No. 2007-552235, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,131,647, 4 pages. |
Translated Korean Office Action mailed Dec. 19, 2014 for Korean patent application No. 10-2009-7024280, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 10 pages. |
Leach et al, “A Universally Unique IDentifier (UUID) URN Namespace”, Jul. 2005, IETF, retrieved on Apr. 21, 2010 at http://tools.ietf.org/pdf/rfc4122.pdf, 32 pgs. |
Leutwyler, “Shape-shifting Polymer Gels”, retrieved on May 7, 2009 at <<http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=shape-shifting-polymer-ge&print=true>>, Scientific American, Nov. 9, 2000, 1 pg. |
“Mastering to Become a True Manager, Well-selected commands for an efficient event log management, Part 1,” Windows Server World, vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 86-96, IDG Japan, Japan, Feb. 1, 2004. |
Means, et al., “Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields”, OET Bulletin 65 Edition 97-01, Jun. 2001, 57 pages. |
Mercier et al., “Sphere of influence Model in Information retrieval”, IEEE 2005 International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, pp. 120-pp. 125. |
Nakatani, et al., “3D Form Display with Shape Memory Alloy”, In Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Artificial Reality and Teleexistence (ICAT), 2003, pp. 179-184. |
Navarro, et al., “Modern Information Retrieval, Chapter 8: Indexing and Searching”, Jan. 1, 1999, Modern Information Retrieval, ACM Press, New York, pp. 191-228. |
Office Action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,375, mailed on Jan. 19, 2010, 31 pgs. |
Office Action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,378, mailed on Oct. 15, 2009, 31 pgs. |
Office Action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,375, mailed on Aug. 6, 2010, 17 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/366,941, mailed on Jan. 6, 2015, Scott Dixon, “Bundled Digital Content”, 15 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,518, mailed on Jan. 9, 2015, John Lattyak, “Acquisition of an Item Based on a Catalog Presentation of Items”, 13 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/886,877, mailed on Jan. 15, 2015, Gilles Jean Roger Belin, “Cover Display”, 45 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/943,211, mailed on Feb. 6, 2013, Reztlaff, II et al., “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 9 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,484, mailed on Jan. 24, 2012, Thomas A. Ryan, “Expedited Acquisition of a Digital Item Following a Sample Presentation of the Item”, 22 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/414,914, mailed on Jan. 4, 2012, Agarwal et al., “Questions on Highlighted Passages”, 41 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,089, mailed on Oct. 5, 2011, Killalea et al., “Aggregation of Highlights”, 75 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,961, mailed on Oct. 10, 2014, John Lattyak, “Delivery of Items for Consumption by a User Device”, 8 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,392, mailed on Oct. 14, 2011, Thomas Ryan, “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System”, 38 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374 mailed on Oct. 16, 2012, Ryan et al, “Consumption of Items via a User Device”, 13 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,386, mailed on Oct. 16, 2013, Ryan et al., “Handling of Subscription-Related Issues in a Media Consumption System”,18 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,390, mailed on Oct. 24, 2011, Bajaj et al., “Providing User-Supplied Items to a User Device”, 11 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/284,446, mailed on Oct. 31, 2014, Linsey R. Hansen, “Indicators for Navigating Digital Works”, 17 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/083,445, mailed on Oct. 5, 2012, Siegel et al., “Method and System for Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”, 29 pages. |
Office Action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,378, mailed on Oct. 6, 2014, Lattyak et al., “Transfer of Instructions to a User Device”, 16 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, mailed on Oct. 7, 2014, Siegelet al., “Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”, 12 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/943,211, mailed on Oct. 8, 2013, “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 9 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/759,828, mailed on Nov. 10, 2011, James R. Retzalff II, “Search and Indexing on a User Device”, 16 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,089, mailed on Nov. 23, 2012, Killalea et al., “Aggregation of Highlights”, 15 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,518, mailed on Nov. 25, 2011, John Lattyak, “Acquisition of an Item Based on a Catalog Presentation of Items,” 8 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/959,589, mailed on Nov. 6, 2014, Thomas A. Ryan, “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System”, 29 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/414,914, mailed on Aug. 4, 2011, Agarwal et al., “Questions on Highlighted Passages”, 39 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,685, mailed on Aug. 15, 2013, Lattyak et al., “Relative Progress and Event Indicators”, 24 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,376, mailed on Aug. 19, 2013, Kiraly et al., “Notification of a User Device to Perform an Action”, 16 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,484, mailed on Aug. 19, 2011, Thomas A. Ryan, “Expedited Acquisition of a Digital Item Following a Sample Presentation of the Item”, 13 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,363, mailed on Aug. 26, 2011, James R. Rezlaff II, “Search Results Generation and Sorting”, 10 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,484, mailed on Aug. 27, 2013, Ryan, “Expedited Acquisition of a Digital Item Following a Sample Presentation of the Item”, 13 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,314, mailed on Aug. 28, 2014, Griffin et al., “Display Dependent Markup Language”, 52 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,358, mailed on Sep. 12, 2011, James R. Retzlaff II, “Managing Status of Search Index Generation”, 11 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/414,914, mailed on Sep. 13, 2013, Agarwal et al, “Questions on Highlighted Passages”, 35 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, mailed on Sep. 16, 2013, James R. Reztlaff II et al., “Search of Multiple Content Sources on a User Device”, 23 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/294,803, mailed on Sep. 24, 2013, John Lattyak, “Progress Indication for a Digital Work”, 27 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/083,445, mailed on Sep. 24, 2014, Siegel et al., “Method and System for Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”, 31 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,618, mailed on Sep. 26, 2011, Michael Rykov, “Dissemination of Periodical Samples”, 15 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, mailed on Sep. 27, 2011, Thomas Ryan, “Consumption of Items via a User Device”, 17 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,518, mailed on Sep. 4, 2014, Lattyak, “Acquisition of an Item Based on a Catalog Presentation of Items”, 10 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,961, mailed on Sep. 5, 2013, Lattyak et al., “Delivery of Items for Consumption by a User Devic”, 6 pages. |
Oki et al., “The Infomation Bus—An Architecture for Extensive Distributed Systems”, ACM, 1993, 11 pages. |
OQO “A Full PC That Fits in Your Pocket” Retrieved on Sep. 22, 2008 at <<http://www.oqo.com/support/documentation.html>>, 34 pages. |
Palm Reader Handbook, Palm Inc., 2000, 56 pages. |
PCT International Search Report and the Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US 08/64389, mailed on Jan. 28, 2009, 7 pgs. |
International Search Report mailed Sep. 9, 2008, in International Application No. PCT/US/08/64387, filed May 21, 2008, 1 page. |
International Search Report mailed Aug. 15, 2008, in International Application No. PCT/US07/89105, filed Dec. 28, 2007, 2 pages. |
International Search Report mailed Aug. 15, 2008, in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US08/57829, filed Mar. 21, 2008, 1 page. |
International Search Report mailed Jul. 7, 2008, in International Application No. PCT/US08/57848, filed Mar. 31, 2008, 2 pages. |
International Search Report mailed Sep. 9, 2008, in International Application No. PCT/US08/64387, filed May 21, 2008, 1 page. |
PCT Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US10/22060, mailed Mar. 8, 2010 (7 pages). |
PCT International Search Report and the Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2006/001752, mailed on Jul. 27, 2006, 8 pgs. |
“Say No to Third Voice,” Worldzone.net, 1999-2004, <http://worldzone.netiinternetipixelsnttv/index.html> [retrieved Jan. 30, 2004]. 5 pages. |
“Shape Memory Polymer”, retrieved on May 7, 2009 at <<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shape—Memory—Polymer>>, Wikipedia, 8 pgs. |
Sohn et al. “Development of a Standard Format for eBooks”, SAC2002, Madrid, Spain, 2002 ACM 1-58113-445-2/02/0, 6 pages. |
“The Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School: Annotation Engine,” Harvard.Edu, 1999-2004, <http://cyber.iaw.harvard.eduJprojects/annotate.html> [Retrieved Jan. 30, 2004]. 3 pages. |
Marshall, C.C., “The Future of Annotation in a Digital (Paper) World,” Proceedings o/the 35th Annual GSLIS Clinic, University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign, Urbana, 11, Mar. 22-24, 1998, pp. 1-19. |
Kumar, A., “Third Voice Trails off . . . ,” Wired News, 2004, <http://www.wired.comlnews/printIO. 1294,42803 ,00.html> [retrieved Jan. 30, 2004]. 3 pages. |
“Trilogy Definition”, Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, Tenth Edition, 1999, 2 pages. |
“Universal Unique Identifier”, dated Dec. 16, 2002. The Open Group, 9 pages. Retrieved on Apr. 21, 2010 via Wayback Machine at http://web.archive.org/web/20021216070918/http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9629399/apdxa.htm, 9 pages. |
“Web Services Architecture: W3C Working Group Note Feb. 11, 2004”, Feb. 11, 2004, W3C, 100 pages. Retrieved on Apr. 21, 2010 via Wayback Machine at http://web.archive.org/web/2004040205185/http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-arch/. |
Wellman, et al., “Mechanical Design and Control of a High-Bandwidth Shape Memory Alloy Tactile Display”, Springer-Verlag, In the Proceedings of the International Symposium on Experimental Robotics, Barcelona, Spain, Jun. 1997, pp. 56-66, 12 pgs. |
Yoshikawa, et al., “Vertical Drive Micro Actuator for Haptic Display Using Shape Memory Alloy Thin Film”, IEE Japan, Papers of Technical Meeting on Micromachine and Sensor System, Journal Code L2898B, vol. MSS-05, No. 21-44, 2005, pp. 103-108. |
Ziviani, N ED, Baeza-Yates R. et at: “Modern Information Retrieval, Text Operations”, Jan. 1, 1999, Modern Information Retrieval, ACM Press, NY, pp. 163-190. |
Zobel, J. et al., “Inverted Files for Text Search Engines” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 38, No. 2, Jul. 1, 2006, pp. 1-56, NY, NY. |
Barnes & Noble, “Nook User Guide”, retrieved from the internet Feb. 5, 2013, 120 pgs. |
Kindle Community, Discussions—Screen Saver, retrieved from the internet on Nov. 6, 2009 at <<http://www.amazon.com/tag/kindle/forum?cdForum=Fx1D7SY3BVSESG&cdThread=Tx28QGUBE29L22J>>, 4 pages. |
“Kobo Wireless eReader & Desktop Application User Guide”, Feb. 2011, 170 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/886,877, mailed on Feb. 21, 2014, Gilles Jean Roger Belin, “Cover Display”, 36 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/567,984, mailed on Mar. 15, 2013, Kim, “Last Screen Rendering for Electronic Book Readern”, 10 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/070,328, mailed on Jul. 25, 2013, Rachabathuni, “Last Screen Rendering for Electronic Book Readers”, 11 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/886,877, mailed on Sep. 11, 2013, Belin et al., “Cover Display”, 31 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/567,984, mailed on Sep. 27, 2012, John T. Kim, “Last Screen Rendering for Electronic Book Reader”, 9 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/070,328, mailed on Feb. 25, 2014, Sailesh Rachabathuni, “Last Screen Rendering for Electronic Book Readers”, 11 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/070,328, mailed on Aug. 12, 2014, Rachabathuni, “Last Screen Rendering for Electronic Book Readers”, 6 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/886,877, mailed on Aug. 13, 2014, Belin et al., “Cover Display”, 40 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/277,894, filed Mar. 29, 2006, Jateen P. Parekh, Gregg E. Zehr, and Subram Narasimhan,“Reader Device Content Indexing”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,484, filed Sep. 29, 2006, Thomas Ryan, “Expedited Acquisition of a Digital Item Following a Sample Presentation of the Item.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,518, filed Sep. 29, 2006, John Lattyak, “Acquisition of an Item based on a Catalog Presentation of Items.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,685, filed Mar. 29, 2007, John Lattyak; John Kim; Steven Moy; Laurent An Minh Nguyen, “Relative Progress and Event Indicators.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,314, filed Jun. 14, 2007, John Lattyak; Craig Griffin; Steven Weiss, “Display Dependent Markup Language.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,339, filed Jun. 14, 2007, David Isbister; Marshall Willilams; Nicholas Vaccaro, “Power Management Techniques for a User Device.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,357, filed Jun. 14, 2007, James Reztlaff II; John Lattyak, “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,363, filed Jun. 14, 2007, James Reztlaff II; Thomas Ryan, “Search Results Generation and Sorting.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,375, filed Jun. 14, 2007, John Lattyak, Girish Bansil Bajaj, Kevin R. Cheung, Thomas Fruchterman, Robert L. Goodwin, Kenneth P. Kiraly, Richard Moore, Subram Narasimhan, Thomas A. Ryan, Michael V. Rykov, Jon Saxton, James C. Slezak, Beryl Tomay, Aviram Zagorie, Gregg Elliott Zehr, “Delivery of Items for Consumption by a User Device.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,376, filed Jun. 14, 2007, Kenneth Kiraly; Thomas Ryan; Gregg Zehr; John Lattyak; Michael Rykov; Girish Bansilal Bajaj; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin, “Notification of a User Device to Perform an Action.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,378, filed Jun. 14, 2007, John Lattyak; Thomas Ryan; Gregg Zehr; Kenneth Kiraly; Michael Rykov; Girish Bansilal Bajaj; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin; Xiaotian Guo, “Transfer of Instructions to a User Device.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,381, filed Jun. 14, 2007, Michael Rykov; Girish Bansilal Bajaj; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin, “Selecting and Providing Items in a Media Consumption System.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,386, filed Jun. 14, 2007, Thomas Ryan; Gregg Zehr; Kenneth Kiraly; John Lattyak; Michael Rykov; Girish Bansilal Bajaj; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin, “Handling of Subscription-Related Issues in a Media Consumption System.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,390, filed Jun. 14, 2007, Girish Bansilal Bajaj; Michael Rykov; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin,, “Providing User-Supplied Items to a User Device.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,392, filed Jun. 14, 2007, Thomas Ryan; Gregg Zehr; Kenneth Kiraly; John Lattyak; Subram Narasimhan; Michael Rykov; Girish Bansilal Bajaj; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin, “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,393, filed Jun. 14, 2007, John Lattyak; Michael Rykov; Girish Bansilal Bajaj; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin,, “Incremental Updates of Items.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,395, filed Jun. 14, 2007, Thomas Ryan; Gregg Zehr; Kenneth Kiraly; John Lattyak; Michael Rykov; Girish Bansilal Bajaj; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin; James Reztlaff II, “Providing Supplemental Information Basedon Hints in a Media Comsumption System.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,618, filed Dec. 21, 2007, Michael Rykov; Laurent An Minh Nguyen; Steven Moy, “Dissemination of Periodical Samples.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/333,215, filed Dec. 11, 2008, Aviram Zagorie; Craig Griffin; John Lattyak; Michael Rykov, “Device-Specific Presentation Control for Electronic Book Reader Devices.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/351,629, filed Jan. 9, 2009, John Johnston; Weiping Dou; Steven Chase, “Antenna Placement on Portable Device.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/351,663, filed Jan. 9, 2009, Chris Li; Steven Chase, “Surface Mount Clip for Routing and Grounding Cables.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,089, filed Jan. 26, 2009, Thomas Dimson, Janna Hamaker, Eugene Kalenkovich, Tom Killalea, “Aggregation of Highlights.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,744, filed Jan. 27, 2009, Rajiv Kotesh Ghanta; Marcos Frid; Joseph J. Hebenstreit; John T. Kim, “Electronic Device With Haptic Feedback.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/366,941, filed Feb. 6, 2009, Scott Dixon; Eriel Thomas, “Bundled Digital Content.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/414,914, filed Mar. 31, 2009, Amit Agarwal; Zaur Kambarov; Tom Killalea, “Questions on Highlighted Passages.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/331,528, filed Jan. 27, 2009, Chris Green, “User Interface Cluster.” |
“A Universally Unique IDentifier (UUID) URN Namespace”, Jul. 2005, IETF, 32 pages. Retrieved on Apr. 21, 2010 at http://tools.ietf.org/pdf/rfc4122.pdf. |
“Annotation Engine,” Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School <http://cyber.law .harvard. edulproj ectsl annotate.html> [Retrieved Jan. 30, 2004], 3 pages. |
“Annotator Instructions,” Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School <<http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/annotate/instructions.html>>, also found at <<http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/cite/instructions.html>>, [Retrieved Jan. 30, 2004], 1 page. |
“Annotator Wishlist,” Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School r <http://cyber.law.harvard.edulcite/annotate.cgi ?action=print&markup ;center=; view=http%3A%2F%2Fcy . . . > [Retrieved Jan. 30, 2004]. 1 page. |
BarnesandNoble.com, “Barnes and Noble Homepage”, retrieved on Aug. 2, 2011 http://web.archive.org/web/19981202183957/http://www.barnesandnoble.com/, Dec. 2, 1998, 2 pages. |
Beigbeder et al., “An Information Retrieval Model Using the Fuzzy Proximity Degree of Term Occurences”, 2005 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 1018-pp. 1022. |
Bellwood, et al., “UDDI Version 2.04 API Specification UDDI Committee Specification, Jul. 19, 2002”, Oasis, 95 pages. Retrieved on Apr. 21, 2010 via Wayback Machine at http://web.archive.org/web/20050314033213/www.oasis-open.org/committees/uddi-spec/doc/tcspecs.htm. |
Roscheisen, M., et al., “Beyond Browsing: Shared Comments, SOAPs, Trails, and On-Line Communities,” Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 27:739-749, 1995. |
Biskup, J., et al, “Towards a Credential-Based Implementation of Compound Access Control Policies” SACMAT '04, Proceedings of the ninth ACM symposium on Access control models and technologies, Jun. 4, 2004, NY, retrieved from the internet: http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=990036.990042 (retrieved Nov. 9, 2010, 10 pages. |
Bradley, “Plastic Shape Shifter”, retreived on May 7, 2009 at <<http://www.reactivereports.com/61/61—3.html>>, Chemistry WebMagazine, Issue No. 61, Dec. 2006, 2 pgs. |
Breu, M. et al., “The Medoc Distrubuted Electronic Library: Accounting and Security Aspects”, Electronic Publishing, New Models and Opportunities, Proceedings of an ICCC/IFIP Conference, Apr. 14, 1997, pp. 237-249. |
The Canadian Office Action mailed Dec. 15, 2014 for Canadian patent application No. 2681754, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 5 pages. |
Canadian Office Action mailed Apr. 14, 2009 for Canadian Patent Application No. 2594573, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645, 3 pages. |
The Canadian Office Action mailed May 29, 2014 for Canadian patent application No. 2684580, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 3 pages. |
Canadian Office Action mailed Jul. 6, 2012 for Canadian patent application No. 2594573, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,131,647, 5 pages. |
The Canadian Office Action mailed Aug. 14, 2014 for Canadian patent application No. 2684955, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, 3 pages. |
Cafesoft.com, “Security Glossary”, dated Oct. 13, 2003, retrieved from the Wayback Machine on Jul. 2, 2009 at <<http://web.archive.org/web/20031013022218/http://cafesoft.com/support/security-glossary.html>>, 6 pages. |
Card et al., “3Book: A 3D Electronic Smart Book”, AVI'04 May 25-28, 2004, Hallipoli, Italy, ACM 2004, pp. 303-pp. 307. |
Cavanaugh “EBooks and Accommodations”, Teaching Expectional Children vol. 35 No. 2 p. 56-61 Copyright 2002 CEC. |
Cavanaugh, “EBooks and Accommodations”, Teaching Exceptional Children, vol. 35, No. 2, Copyright 2002 CEC, 6 pages. |
Chi et al. “eBooks with Indexes that Reorganize Conceptually”, CHI2004, Apr. 24-29, 2004, Vienna, Austria ACM 1-58113-703-6/04/0004. |
Cleveland, Jr. et al., “Questions and Answers about Biological Effects and Potential Hazards of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields” OET Bulletin 56, Fourth Edition, Aug. 1999, 38 pages. |
Cleveland, Jr., et al, “Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields” OET Bulletin 65, Edition 97-01, Aug. 1997, 84 pages. |
Translated Chinese Office Action mailed May 9, 2008 for Chinese Patent Application No. 200680002606.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645, 22 pages. |
Translated Chinese Second Office Action mailed Jun. 5, 2009 for Chinese Patent Application No. 200680002606.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645, 20 pages. |
Translated Chinese Third Office Action mailed Nov. 27, 2009 for Chinese Patent Application No. 200680002606.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645, 15 pages. |
Translated Chinese Office Action mailed Feb. 25, 2014 for Chinese patent application No. 200880025056.5 , a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 13 pages. |
Translated Chinese Office Action mailed Jan. 6, 2014 for Chinese patent application No. 201080006308.7, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,378,979, 12 pages. |
Translated Chinese Office Action mailed Oct. 10, 2011 for Chinese patent application No. 200880017259.X, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, 7 pages. |
Translated Chinese Office Action mailed Nov. 5, 2013 for Chinese patent application No. 200880025056.5, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 15 pages. |
Translated Chinese Office Action mailed Dec. 13, 2012 for Chinese patent application No. 20078004873.9, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 7,865,817, 4 pages. |
Translated Chinese Office Action mailed Dec. 14, 2012 for Chinese patent application No. 200880017589.9, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 8 pages. |
Translated Chinese Office Aciton mailed Feb. 1, 2013 for Chinese patent application No. 200880025056.5, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 19 pages. |
Translated Chinese Office Action mailed May 17, 2012 for Chinese patent application No. 20078004873.9, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 7,865,817, 5 pages. |
Translated Chinese Office Action mailed May 21, 2012 for Chinese patent application No. 200880017589.9, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 9 pages. |
Translated Chinese Office Action mailed Jun. 16, 2014 for Chinese patent application No. 200880025056.5, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 18 pages. |
The Chinese Office Action mailed Jun. 28, 2013 for Chinese patent application No. 20078004873.9, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 7,865,817, 4 pages. |
The Chinese Office Action mailed Jun. 5, 2014 for Chinese patent application No. 201080006308.7, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,378,979, 9 pages. |
Translated Chinese Office Action mailed Jun. 6, 2013 for Chinese patent application No. 201080006308.7, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,378,979, 13 pages. |
Translated Chinese Office Action mailed Jul. 10, 2013 for Chinese patent application No. 200880025056.5, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 8 pages. |
Translated Chinese Office Action mailed Jul. 14, 2011 for Japanese patent application No. 20078004873.9, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 7,865,817, 6 pages. |
Translated Chinese Office Action mailed Aug. 25, 2011 for Chinese patent application No. 200880024964.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,358, 6 pages. |
Translated Chinese Office Action mailed Aug. 3, 2012 for Chinese patent application No. 200880025056.5, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 17 pages. |
Translated Chinese Office Action mailed Sep. 24, 2012 for Chinese patent application No. 200880017259.X, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, 5 pages. |
Translated Chinese Office Action mailed Sep. 26, 2011 for Chinese patent application No. 200880017589.9, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 9 pages. |
Translated Chinese Office Action mailed Sep. 30, 2011 for Chinese patent application No. 200880025056.5, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 9 pages. |
Davison et al. “The Use of eBooks and Interactive Multimedia, as Alternative Forms of Technical Documentation” SIGDOC'05, Sep. 21-23, 2005, Conventry, United Kingdom, Copyright 2005 ACM 1-59593-175-9/5/0009, 8 pages. |
Desmoulins et al., “Pattern-Based Annotations on E-books: From Personal to Shared Didactic Content”, Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Techniques in Education, 2002, 4 pages. |
Carter, S., et al., “Digital Graffiti: Public Annotation of Multimedia Content,” Proceedings o/the CHI2004, Vienna, Austria, Apr. 24-29, 2004, pp. 1207-1210. |
Elspass, et al., “Portable Haptic Interface with Active Functional Design”, In Proceedings SPIE Conference on Smart Structures and Integrated Systems, Newport Beach, California, vol. 3668, Mar. 1999, 926-932. |
Extended European Search Report mailed Dec. 22, 2009, issued in corresponding European Patent Application No. EP 06 71 8773.2, filed Jan. 18, 2006. 9 pages. |
The Mintues of the Oral Proceedings mailed on Nov. 27, 2014 for European patent application No. 06718773.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,131,647, 13 pages. |
The European Office Action mailed Sep. 23, 2014 for European patent application No. 08732668.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 7 pages. |
The European Office Action mailed Nov. 27, 2014 for European patent application No. 06718773.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,131,647, 31 pages. |
The European Office Action mailed Dec. 12, 2009 for European Patent Application No. 06718773.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645, 1 page. |
The European Office Action mailed Mar. 26, 20010 for European Patent Application No. 06718773.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645. |
The European Office Action mailed Apr. 7, 2014 for European patent application No. 06718773.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,131,647, 7 pages. |
The European Office Action mailed Jun. 10, 2013 for European patent application No. 06718773.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, 6 pages. |
The European Search report mailed Dec. 22, 2009 for European Patent Application No. 06718773.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645, 9 pages. |
Office Action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,375, mailed Feb. 23, 2010, 15 pages. |
Final Office Action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,378, mailed on Mar. 16, 2010, 16 pgs. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,358, mailed on Apr. 5, 2011, James R. Retzlaff II, “Managing Status of Search Index Generation”, 21 pages. |
Final Office Action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 12/414,914, mailed on Jan. 4, 2012, 16 pgs. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,089, mailed on Jan. 28, 2014, Tom Killalea, “Aggregation of Highlights”, 14 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,395, mailed on Oct. 30, 2013, Thomas A. Ryan, “Providing Supplemental Information Based on Hints in a Media Consumption System”, 14 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/414,914, mailed on Feb. 10, 2014, Amit D. Agarwal, “Questions on Highlighted Passages”, 40 pages. |
Gladney, H. M.: “Access Control for Large Collections”, NY, vol. 15, No. 2, Apr. 1, 1997, pp. 154-194. |
Goodreads.com, “About goodreads”, 2006, 2 pages. |
Malloy, et al., “Google Search”, retrieved on Sep. 17, 2014 at <<http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Google—Search&oldid=118323867>>, Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, Mar. 27, 2007, 6 pages. |
“Haptic History—Machine Haptics (Expansion)” retrieved on May 7, 2009 at <<http://hapticshistory.chc61.uci.cu/haptic/site/pages/Machine-Haptics-Became—5.php.>> from Google's cache, text-only version as webpage appeared on Apr. 16, 2009, 8 pgs. |
Henke, H. “Survey on Electronic Book Features”, Open eBook Forum, online, Mar. 20, 2002, pp. 1-14, retrieved from the internet: <http://www.openebook.org/doc—library/surveys/IDPF—eBook—Features—2002.pdf> retrieved Nov. 8, 2010, 14 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/886,877, mailed on Jun. 16, 2015, Gilles Jean Roger Belin, “Cover Display”, 46 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/959,589, mailed on Jul. 7, 2016, Ryan et al., “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System”, 34 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,386, mailed on Nov. 8, 2011, Thomas Ryan, “Handling of Subscription-Related Issues in a Media Consumption System”, 10 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action, dated Nov. 9, 2011, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,395, Thomas Ryan, “Providing Supplemental Information Based on Hints in a Media Consumption System”, 10 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/759,828, mailed on Dec. 17, 2013, James R. Retzlaff II, “Search and Indexing on a User Device”, 25 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,357 , mailed on Dec. 21, 2011, Reztlaff et al., “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 14 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,363, mailed on Dec. 23, 2011, James R. Rezlaff II et al., “Search Results Generation and Sorting”, 10 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, mailed on Dec. 24, 2013, Thomas A. Ryan, “Consumption of Items via a User Device”, 16 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, mailed on Dec. 29, 2011, James R. Reztlaff II et al., “Search of Multiple Content Sources on a User Device”, 21 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,685, dated Dec. 8, 2011, John Lattyak et al., “Relative Progress and Event Indicators”, 23 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, mailed on Feb. 13, 2012, Thomas Ryan et al., “Consumption of Items via a User Device”, 14 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,392, mailed on Feb. 14, 2013, Ryan et al., “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System”, 47 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,518, mailed on Feb. 14, 2014, John Lattyak, “Acquisition of an Item Based on a Catalog Presentation of Items”, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,393, mailed on Feb. 16, 2012, John Lattyak et al., “Incremental Updates of Items”, 24 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/294,803, mailed on Feb. 21, 2013, Inventor #1, “Progress Indication for a Digital Work”, 76 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,386, mailed on Feb. 28, 2013, Ryan et al., “Handling of Subscription-Related Issues in a Media Consumption System”, 17 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,314, mailed on Mar. 10, 2014, Craig S. Griffin, “Display Dependent Markup Language”, 42 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/366,941, mailed on Mar. 14, 2014, Dixon et al., “Bundled Digital Content”, 13 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,685, mailed on Mar. 24, 2014, John Lattyak, “Relative Progress and Event Indicators”, 26 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,357, mailed on Mar. 27, 2014, James R. Retzlaff II, “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 14 pages. |
Final; Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,089, mailed on Mar. 28, 2012, Tom Killalea et al., “Aggregation of Highlights”, 17 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/366,941, mailed on Mar. 30, 2012, Scott Dixon et al., “Bundled Digital Content”, 12 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,089, mailed on Mar. 5, 2013, Killalea et al., “Aggregation of Highlights”, 17 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, mailed on Apr. 22, 2013, Ryan et al., “Consumption of Items via a User Device”, 17 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, mailed on Apr. 23, 2012, Siegel et al., “Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”, 12 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,961, mailed on Apr. 25, 2014, John Lattyak, “Delivery of Items for Consumption by a User Device”, 4 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,386, mailed on Apr. 26, 2012, Thomas Ryan et al., “Handling of Subscription-Related Issues in a Media Consumption System”, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,518, mailed on Apr. 28, 2011, John Lattyak, “Acquisition of an Item Based on a Catalog Presentation of Items”, 8 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,390, mailed on Apr. 8, 2013, Bajaj et al, “Providing User-Supplied Items to a User Device”, 7 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, mailed on May 14, 2013, Reztlaff, II et al., “Search of Multiple Content Sources on a User Device”, 24 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, mailed on May 14, 2014, Thomas A. Ryan, “Consumption of Items via a User Device”, 21 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,395, mailed on May 2, 2013,Ryan et al., “Providing Supplemental Information Based on Hints in a Media Consumption System”, 12 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/759,828, mailed on May 2, 2014, James R. Retzlaff II, “Search and Indexing on a User Device”, 27 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,357, mailed on May 26, 2011, Reztlaff, “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 13 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/083,445, mailed on May 4, 2012, Hilliard B. Siegel et al., “Method and System for Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”, 20 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,395, mailed May 9, 2012, Thomas Ryan et al., “Providing Supplemental Information Based on Hints in a Media Consumption System”, 12 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,314, mailed on Jun. 13, 2011, Craig S. Griffin, “Display Dependent Markup Language”, 26 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/959,589, mailed on Jun. 2, 2014, Thomas A. Ryan, “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System”, 24 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/284,446, mailed on Jun. 24, 2014, Hansen, “Indicators for Navigating Digital Works”, 19 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,390, mailed on Jun. 26, 2012, Bajaj et al., “Providing User-Supplied Items to a User Device”, 7 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,392, mailed on Jun. 27, 2012, Ryan et al., “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System”, 47 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/294,803, mailed on Jun. 4, 2013, Lattyak et al., “Progress Indication for a Digital Work”, 26 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/949,115, mailed on Jun. 4, 2014, Thomas A. Ryan, “Invariant Referencing in Digital Works”, 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/943,211, mailed on Jun. 6, 2012, James. R. Retzlaff II et al., “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 10 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/759,828, mailed on Jun. 6, 2013, Reztlaff, II et al., “Search and Indexing on a User Device”, 27 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369 mailed on Jun. 7, 2012, James R. Reztlaff II et al., “Search of Multiple Content Sources on a User Device”, 20 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, mailed on Jun. 9, 2011, Hilliard B. Siegel, “Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”, 12 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/333,215, mailed on Jul. 18, 2011, Zagorie et al., “Device-Specific Presentation Control for Electronic Book Reader Devices”, 22 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/943,211, mailed on Jul. 2, 2014, Retzlaff, II et al., “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 9 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,089, mailed on Jul. 3, 2013, Killalea et al., “Aggregation of Highlights”, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,685, John Lattyak, “Relative Progress and Event Indicators”, 22 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/886,877, mailed on Feb. 1, 2016, Belin et al., “Cover Display”, 11 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140218286 A1 | Aug 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12567984 | Sep 2009 | US |
Child | 14246999 | US |