Latch activation between members

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10774887
  • Patent Number
    10,774,887
  • Date Filed
    Friday, December 4, 2015
    8 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 15, 2020
    3 years ago
Abstract
Described herein is a system, method of use and Self Retracting Lifeline (SRL) apparatus using a system that governs a dynamic response between members causing a halt in relative motion between the members. Magnetic interactions, eddy current drag forces and centrifugal and/or inertial forces may provide various mechanisms of governing movement.
Description
BACKGROUND
Technical Field

Described herein is a system, method of use and Self Retracting Lifeline (SRL) apparatus using the system to control relative speed between members.


Description of the Related Art

The applicant's co-pending and granted patents in the field of eddy current related devices include U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,851,235, 8,490,751, NZ619034, NZ627617, NZ627619, NZ627633, NZ627630 and other equivalents all incorporated herein by reference. NZ627617 in particular, describes a method of achieving a latch operation between elements the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. While the devices described in NZ627617 may be useful, other methods of controlling relative movement and/or braking may also be achieved or at least provide the public with a choice.


Further aspects and advantages of the system, method of use and Self Retracting Lifeline (SRL) apparatus should become apparent from the ensuing description that is given by way of example only.


BRIEF SUMMARY

Described herein is a system, method of use and Self Retracting Lifeline (SRL) apparatus using the system that govern a dynamic response between members causing a halt in relative motion between the members. Magnetic interactions, eddy current drag forces and centrifugal and/or inertial forces may provide various mechanisms of governing movement.


In a first aspect, there is provided a system with at least two members in a kinematic relationship, the system comprising a means of coupling a first member to at least one further member and in doing so causing synchronized relative motion between the members, wherein coupling occurs in response to a prescribed system dynamic response, the dynamic response selected from at least one of:


(a) a particular velocity action of one or more of the members;


(b) a particular acceleration action of one or more of the elements;


(c) a particular jerk action of one or more of the elements.


In a second aspect, there is provided a method of governing relative movement between members by the steps of:


(a) selecting the system substantially as described herein;


(b) applying a motive force on the system causing movement of at least one member in the system;


(c) causing coupling between the members when the prescribed system dynamic response occurs.


In a third aspect, there is provided a Self Retracting Lifeline (SRL) incorporating the system substantially as described herein.


The system, method of use and SRL device described offer the advantage of providing alternative ways of achieving movement control or at least provide the public with a choice.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

Further aspects of the system, method of use and SRL device will become apparent from the following description that is given by way of example only and with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:



FIG. 1 illustrates a simplified elevation view of one embodiment of incorporating a magnetic interaction between a braking and moving element;



FIG. 2 illustrates a simplified elevation view of an alternative bi-stable embodiment;



FIG. 3 illustrates a graph showing the magnetic force interaction for the above bi-stable embodiment;



FIG. 4 illustrates a perspective view and elevation view of an alternative embodiment employing a cogging torque approach;



FIG. 5 illustrates two graphs showing the velocity dependent result from the cogging torque approach;



FIG. 6 illustrates a simplified elevation view of a cogging torque approach of a barking and moving element;



FIG. 7 illustrates a simplified elevation view of an alternative embodiment utilizing a rotational degree of freedom;



FIG. 8 illustrates elevation views of alternative cam path embodiments;



FIG. 9 illustrates elevation views of alternative cam path embodiments;



FIG. 10 illustrates perspective views of alternative cam path embodiments;



FIG. 11 illustrates a simplified perspective view of an alternative cam path embodiment;



FIG. 12 illustrates simplified perspective and elevation views of an alternative cam path embodiment;



FIG. 13 illustrates a simplified elevation view of an alternative cam path embodiment;



FIG. 14 illustrates various elevation views of an alternative embodiment using a combination of a cam, geometry, inertial response and eddy current;



FIG. 15 illustrates a simplified elevation view of an art velocity sensitive device using pawls;



FIG. 16 illustrates a simplified elevation view of an art acceleration sensitive device using pawls;



FIG. 17 illustrates a simplified elevation view of a jerk sensitive device;



FIG. 18 illustrates a simplified elevation view of the jerk sensitive device of FIG. 17 in a varying alignment;



FIG. 19 illustrates a simplified elevation views of the magnetic interaction from the embodiment of FIGS. 17 and 18; and



FIG. 20 illustrates a simplified elevation view of an alternative jerk sensitive device.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

As noted above, described herein is a system, method of use and Self Retracting Lifeline (SRL) apparatus using the system that govern a dynamic response between members causing a halt in relative motion between the members. Magnetic interactions, eddy current drag forces and centrifugal and/or inertial forces may provide various mechanisms of governing movement.


For the purposes of this specification, the term ‘about’ or ‘approximately’ and grammatical variations thereof mean a quantity, level, degree, value, number, frequency, percentage, dimension, size, amount, weight or length that varies by as much as 30, 25, 20, 15, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, or 1% to a reference quantity, level, degree, value, number, frequency, percentage, dimension, size, amount, weight or length.


The term ‘substantially’ or grammatical variations thereof refers to at least about 50%, for example 75%, 85%, 95% or 98%.


The term ‘comprise’ and grammatical variations thereof shall have an inclusive meaning—i.e. that it will be taken to mean an inclusion of not only the listed components it directly references, but also other non-specified components or elements.


The term ‘jerk’ or grammatical variations thereof refers to a change in acceleration, typically a rapid and sudden change in acceleration compared to normal operating parameters.


In a first aspect, there is provided a system with at least two members in a kinematic relationship, the system comprising a means of coupling a first member to at least one further member and in doing so causing synchronized relative motion between the members, wherein coupling occurs in response to a prescribed system dynamic response, the dynamic response selected from at least one of:


(a) a particular velocity action of one or more of the members;


(b) a particular acceleration action of one or more of the elements;


(c) a particular jerk action of one or more of the elements.


The inventors have in effect produced a system relating to coupling members together based on the system dynamic response. The aim is to bring the members into synchronized motion under predetermined conditions.


Coupling between the members may be achieved:


(a) mechanically;


(b) magnetically;


(c) a combination of mechanically and magnetically.


Coupling may occur passively and once coupled the members may be remain coupled or may be releasably coupled. Coupling may instead be achieved via an active means.


The synchronized motion may be a zero absolute velocity or halting effect. This effect for example may be useful where all motion needs to stop, for example in a fall safety apparatus.


Coupling may also be based on, or at least influenced by, eddy current induced drag. This is not essential in the inventors experience but may be useful to further tune the dynamic response characteristics.


In one specific embodiment, coupling between the members may be achieved via mechanical coupling between at least one pawl linked to the first member, the pawl having an oscillatory movement action, and at least one latch member on, or being, the at least one further member, coupling occurring at a speed threshold according to the prescribed system dynamic response.


A bias relationship may exist between the pawl and the latch member, the bias being achieved through use of at least one magnet arranged for attraction, repulsion, or alternating attraction and repulsion, of the pawl.


At least one magnetic element may be located on both the pawl and first member and when rotation of the pawl and first member occurs, a varying bias results and hence oscillatory pawl movement occurs. The pawl may be axially mounted on the first member and the pawl center of gravity may be off set from the pawl axis of rotation thereby further influencing the oscillation effect.


As may be appreciated, the degree of oscillation of the pawl may be varied depending for example on the relative rates of motion of the first member and pawl (or first member and at least one further member.


The pawl dynamic response may be further tuned by varying the inertia of the pawl. As noted above, the center of mass of the pawl may be off set from the pawl axis of rotation assuming the pawl is connected in this manner to the first member. A part or parts of the pawl may be weighted so as to tune the inertia of the pawl to movement thereby tuning the dynamic response of the system.


The system may act as follows:


(a) at a predetermined speed, coupling may occur when the pawl moves to a deployed position for a sufficient time period such that it couples with the latch member; and


(b) at speeds below the predetermined speed, the pawl may not couple.


Coupling may be avoided by having the pawl skip over the latch member—that is the pawl may not be sufficiently deployed to interfere with the latch member. Skipping over may continue until the inertial effects of the pawl are overcome and the pawl deploys sufficiently far to couple with the latch member.


The system may further act so that:


(a) the pawl may remain coupled when the speed of motion is insufficient to overcome the inertial effects of the pawl; and


(b) decoupling may occur when the speed of motion is sufficient to overcome the inertial effects of the pawl.


The degree of bias noted above causing oscillation may be configured to provide the desired dynamic response behavior of the pawl.


In an alternative specific embodiment, coupling between the members may be achieved by a mechanical cam system based on the reaction effects of inertial forces and/or applied drag forces according to the prescribed system dynamic response.


In the above system, the first and at least one further member may be aligned together and the cam feature may be located between the first and at least one further member. In effect, the system has at least two independent but moving members.


The at least one further member may be configured with either or both of inertial characteristics and/or retarding drag due to motion such that it is subject to a slowed motion with respect to the first member when a motive force is applied on the system.


Relative velocity between the first and at least one further member may provide a displacement between the members and may urge the members to separate due to the cam profile prescribed movement path. Separation refers to the members moving apart with respect to each other.


Movement of the at least one further member may cause coupling with a latch member on or about the first member, coupling at least one anchor on the at least one further member to the latch member.


As may be appreciated, coupling of the further member to the latch member also results in coupling indirectly between the first and further member.


Coupling may be achieved via:


(a) a geometric latching interface;


(b) attraction of magnetic poles; or


(c) a combination of a geometric latching interface and attraction of magnetic poles.


In a further specific embodiment, coupling may rely on magnetic forces between the members wherein the magnetic forces between the members are configured to achieve an attraction force between the members, the attraction force being sufficient to slow and halt relative motion between the members resulting in synchronized relative motion according to the prescribed system dynamic response.


The magnetic forces may be imposed by magnetic pole elements acting between the members. For the purposes of this specification, magnetic pole action is termed ‘cogging’. The cogging system may be designed in consideration of the dynamic behavior of the connected system and any peripheral energy absorbing means such that the system achieves a stop and hold action under the intended conditions. The magnetic pole elements may be configured to be ineffective or inactive under predetermined conditions. Variation in magnetic pole action may for example be achieved by varying the separation distance between members or parts thereof containing the magnet or magnets thereby reducing the magnetic interaction forces.


The system above may be a continuously coupled system where an externally applied motive force results in initial movement of the members, but a slow and halt action takes effect immediately between the members provided the motive force is sufficient to induce the prescribed system dynamic response.


As may be appreciated, in the first aspect above and the specific embodiments described, the members may move in a substantially linear kinematic relationship. Alternatively, the members may move in a substantially rotational kinematic relationship. Both actions may be possible and appropriate depending on the device in which the system may be used. Examples given or used herein are described in the rotational embodiment. Linear equivalent embodiments will be obvious to someone skilled in the art.


In a yet further specific embodiment, the members may be in a substantially rotational kinematic relationship and coupling between the members may be achieved via a centrifugal based system designed so that, on application of a motive force of a predetermined magnitude, the members couple together according to the prescribed system dynamic response.


The centrifugal forces acting on the members may be influenced by use of at least one weight or weighted element or part thereof.


The first and at least one further member may be aligned together and the centrifugal feature or features may be located between the first and at least one further member.


Velocity of the members may urge a displacement of the centrifugal feature or features which in turn urges the members to separate due to the centrifugal force imposed on the at least one further member.


Movement of the at least one further member may cause coupling with a latch member on or about the first member, coupling at least one anchor of the at least one further member to the latch member. As may be appreciated, coupling of the further member to the latch member also results in coupling indirectly between the first and further member.


Coupling may be achieved via:


(a) a geometric latching interface;


(b) attraction of magnetic poles; or


(c) a combination of a geometric latching interface and attraction of magnetic poles.


As noted above, the dynamic response may be in one of three ways. In more detail, specific examples of how the three actions might take place may be as follows:

    • A velocity sensitive device may be configured using pawls that are activated by centripetal forces acting against the constraint of a biasing element;
    • An acceleration sensitive device may make use of the inertial behavior of a pawl causing rotation of the pawl about its pivot in response to acceleration of the pawl mounting plate;
    • A jerk sensitive device may be configured by making use of the non-linear shear force capacity that exists between a pair of magnetic poles.


As should be appreciated, the configuration may be varied and the above options should be seen as non-limiting examples only.


In a second aspect, there is provided a method of governing relative movement between members by the steps of:


(a) selecting the system substantially as described herein;


(b) applying a motive force on the system causing movement of at least one member in the system;


(c) causing coupling between the members when the prescribed system dynamic response occurs.


In a third aspect, there is provided a Self Retracting Lifeline (SRL) incorporating the system substantially as described herein.


As noted above, the devices described may be used in SRL devices. The ability to detect and activate a braking element is important for SRL apparatus.


Detection of a fall event is commonly triggered by a mechanism that responds to a change in state of the line. Mechanisms can potentially be triggered by the displacement, velocity, acceleration or jerk (rate of change of acceleration) of the line, or by a combination of these signals.


Existing SRLs commonly make use of velocity or acceleration mechanisms, typically using a ratchet and pawl arrangement to couple the spool to a brake. Either the ratchet plate or the pawl set can be attached to the rotating spool.


A linear configuration may comprise a means of sensing a change in acceleration (jerk) of a carrier (moving element). The carrier may be attached to a rider (braking element) of known mass with a given inertia. When a contact force is applied to the carrier the rider and carrier remain coupled and aligned. A change in the applied force to the carrier (jerk) causes the rider to slip relative to the carrier due to the inertial effects. The inertial effects may then be tracked through displacement between the rider and carrier. When the carrier acceleration changes, the relative displacement between the rider and carrier also changes.


The same principle may be used in a rotational sense. The rider may be free to rotate with the carrier. A change in angular acceleration applied to the carrier may be resolved as a relative angular displacement between the carrier and rider.


Besides SRL applications, the devices and methods may be used for a variety of other applications, non-limiting examples including speed control or load control of:

    • An autobelay device;
    • A rotor in a rotary turbine;
    • Exercise equipment e.g. rowing machines, epicyclic trainers, weight training equipment;
    • Roller-coasters and other amusement rides;
    • Elevator and escalator systems;
    • Evacuation descenders and fire escape devices;
    • Conveyer systems:
    • Rotary drives in factory production facilities;
    • Materials handling devices such as conveyer belts or a braking device in a chute;
    • Roadside safety systems e.g. the energy absorber may be connected in a system to provide crash attenuation though the dissipation of energy via the energy absorber;
    • Seat belts in vehicles;
    • Zip lines;
    • Braking mechanisms for trolleys and carriages;
    • Bumpstops in transport applications;
    • Bumpstops in crane applications;
    • Torque or force limiting devices in mechanical drive train;
    • Structural overload protection in wind turbines;
    • Load limiting and energy dissipation in structures, buildings and bridges.


The system, method of use and SRL device described above offer the advantage of providing alternative ways of achieving movement control beyond for example reliance on centrifugal and/or eddy current forces alone. In addition, the relationship between the parts and the rate at which movement control occurs may also be influenced using the embodiments described herein.


The embodiments described above may also be said broadly to consist in the parts, elements and features referred to or indicated in the specification of the application, individually or collectively, and any or all combinations of any two or more said parts, elements or features, and where specific integers are mentioned herein which have known equivalents in the art to which the embodiments relate, such known equivalents are deemed to be incorporated herein as of individually set forth.


Where specific integers are mentioned herein which have known equivalents in the art to which this invention relates, such known equivalents are deemed to be incorporated herein as if individually set forth.


WORKING EXAMPLES

The above described system, method of use and examples of Self Retracting Lifeline (SRL) apparatus using the devices are now described by reference to specific examples.


Example 1

General examples are provided below of magnetic latching caused by movement of a braking element.



FIG. 1 illustrates an example of magnetic latching caused by movement of a pawl. Direct attractive forces exerted by permanent magnets 10 may be used to either augment or replace eddy current drag forces (if eddy current forces are used) as a means of activating a pawl 11 between the spool 12 (the first member) and a concentric external element 13 (the further member). When the pawl 11 is latched with the concentric external element 13, movement between the spool 12 and concentric external element 13 is synchronized.


Example 2

A bi-stable arrangement can be used in conjunction with a tube and cylinder (plunger) approach described in the applicants co-pending application NZ619034. In this example, as illustrated in FIG. 2, a plunger 50 eddy current brake configuration is shown as a means of delaying the initial relative motion between the active brake element/plunger 50 and the lead screw 51 and/or to latch and lock the brake 50 at the end of the plunger axial travel stroke 52, 53. The output in terms of force/movement interaction is graphed in FIG. 3 showing how the force at either end of the plunger stroke 52, 53 is high and subsequently drops through the travel phase of the plunger stroke 52, 53 noting that the term force refers to the force required to translate the plunger sideways and movement is the lateral movement of the plunger.


Example 3

In a further embodiment, a cogging example is illustrated in FIG. 4. A cogging torque results from magnetic poles rotating with respect to each other generally indicated by arrow 60. This results in a speed-dependent torque relationship best seen in the graphs shown in FIG. 5 where F refers to the force/degree of oscillation and o refers to the movement path that can enable low-speed lock-off of a brake that relies on eddy current braking (the highest latching force occurs at low speed).



FIG. 6 shows how the magnets 60 align at low speed thereby halting further movement. This embodiment allows a complete halt in relative movement between the parts but without part interference or friction—that is braking is frictionless.



FIG. 6 also illustrates a centrifugal embodiment. One of the members includes weighted balls that move along a defined path. At maximum rotation force, the balls move to alter the center of gravity thereby changing the dynamic response of the system.


Example 4

Magnetic latching of a braking element can also be configured about a rotational degree of freedom normal to the primary drive axis, in this example being the rotation axis 70 of the braking element 71 relative to the moving element 72 (a rotor). FIG. 7 illustrates three embodiments of this type of system. Also shown in the FIG. 7 embodiments is the use of a bias (magnets and/or springs) that further tune the dynamic response of the system.


Example 5

Relative rotation between the moving and braking elements may also be further influenced by use of inertial or centrifugal forces resulting in differential velocity between the elements. In one embodiment, a differential velocity may be used to drive an axial displacement via a cam path 100 as illustrated in FIGS. 8 to 13. Different profiles can be used to control ball movement and thus alter the centrifugal force acting on the parts and their movement characteristics.


The axial load required to maintain contact between the two halves in the embodiments shown in FIGS. 8 to 13 may be generated by a spring force, a magnetic repulsive force or as a result of eddy current drag torque acting through the cam 100 angle. Additional detail on this force generation is shown in FIGS. 12 and 13.


Example 6

Another arrangement that exploits the combination of cam geometry, inertial response and the eddy current drag force-speed relationship is shown in FIG. 14.


Example 7

As noted above, the ability to detect and activate a braking element is important for SRL apparatus.


Detection of a fall event is commonly triggered by a mechanism that responds to a change in state of the line. Mechanisms can potentially be triggered by the displacement, velocity, acceleration or jerk (rate of change of acceleration) of the line, or by a combination of these signals.


Existing SRLs commonly make use of velocity or acceleration mechanisms, typically using a ratchet and pawl arrangement to couple the spool to a brake. Either the ratchet plate or the pawl set can be attached to the rotating spool.


An art velocity sensitive device can be configured using pawls (braking elements) 110 that are activated by centripetal forces acting against the constraint of a biasing element (spring) 111 as illustrated in FIG. 15.


An art acceleration sensitive device can make use of the inertial behavior of the pawl 112 causing rotation of the pawl 112 about its pivot 113 in response to acceleration of the pawl 112 mounting plate. This approach is illustrated in FIG. 16.


Example 8

A jerk sensitive device can be configured by making use of the non-linear shear force capacity that exists between a pair of magnetic poles.


A linear configuration is illustrated in FIGS. 17 to 19. The configuration shows a means of sensing the change in acceleration (jerk) of a carrier. The carrier 120 is attached to a rider 130 of known mass with a given inertia. When a contact force is applied to the carrier 120 the rider 130 and carrier 120 remain coupled and aligned. A change in the applied force to the carrier 120 (jerk) causes the rider 130 to slip relative to the carrier 120 due to the inertial effects. The inertial effects may then be tracked through displacement ‘d’. When the carrier 120 acceleration changes, the relative displacement between the rider 130 and carrier 120 changes.


Aspects of the system, method of use and Self Retracting Lifeline (SRL) apparatus using the system have been described by way of example only and it should be appreciated that modifications and additions may be made thereto without departing from the scope of the claims herein.


These and other changes can be made to the embodiments in light of the above-detailed description. In general, in the following claims, the terms used should not be construed to limit the claims to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification and the claims, but should be construed to include all possible embodiments along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled. Accordingly, the claims are not limited by the disclosure.

Claims
  • 1. A system comprising: a coupler configured to selectively couple a first member including a spool to at least one further member including an external member, and in doing so cause synchronized relative motion between the first member including the spool and the at least one further member including the external member;wherein the coupler includes a pawl linked to the spool;wherein the spool is rotatable within the external member and when the spool rotates within the external member below a speed threshold, the pawl oscillates relative to the spool and the coupler does not couple the first member including the spool to the at least one further member including the external member;wherein when the spool rotates within the external member above the speed threshold, the pawl of the coupler moves to a deployed position such that the pawl couples the first member including the spool to the at least one further member including the external member.
  • 2. The system of claim 1 wherein the pawl experiences an alternating bias during rotation of the spool, the alternating bias causing the oscillation of the pawl.
  • 3. The system of claim 2, further comprising a plurality of magnetic elements arranged to provide the alternating bias through alternating attraction and repulsion of the pawl.
  • 4. The system of claim 3 wherein the bias acts between the pawl and the external member.
  • 5. The system of claim 1 wherein the oscillation of the pawl is achieved magnetically and coupling of the first member including the spool to the at least one further member including the external member is achieved mechanically.
  • 6. The system of claim 1 wherein coupling of the first member including the spool to the at least one further member including the external member is achieved both mechanically and magnetically.
  • 7. The system of claim 1 wherein the synchronized relative motion is a zero absolute velocity or halting effect.
  • 8. The system of claim 1 wherein coupling of the first member including the spool to the at least one further member including the external member is based on or influenced by an eddy current induced drag.
  • 9. The system of claim 1 wherein coupling between the first member including the spool and the at least one further member including the external member is achieved via mechanical coupling between the pawl and at least one latch member on the external member.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
701545 Dec 2014 NZ national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/NZ2015/050205 12/4/2015 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2016/089225 6/9/2016 WO A
US Referenced Citations (182)
Number Name Date Kind
2058024 Logan, Jr. Oct 1936 A
2122312 Cassion Jun 1938 A
2122315 Fosty et al. Jun 1938 A
2272509 Cavallo Feb 1942 A
2409009 Bakke Oct 1946 A
2428104 Winther Sep 1947 A
2437871 Wood Mar 1948 A
2492776 Winther Dec 1949 A
2771171 Schultz Nov 1956 A
2807734 Lehde Sep 1957 A
3364795 De Coye De Castelet Jan 1968 A
3447006 Bair May 1969 A
3721394 Reiser Mar 1973 A
3868005 McMillan Feb 1975 A
3934446 Avitzur Jan 1976 A
3962595 Eddens Jun 1976 A
3967794 Fohl Jul 1976 A
4078719 Durland et al. Mar 1978 A
4093186 Golden Jun 1978 A
4224545 Powell Sep 1980 A
4271944 Hanson Jun 1981 A
4306688 Hechler, IV Dec 1981 A
4416430 Totten Nov 1983 A
4434971 Cordrey Mar 1984 A
4544111 Nakajima Oct 1985 A
4561605 Nakajima Dec 1985 A
4567963 Sugimoto Feb 1986 A
4612469 Muramatsu Sep 1986 A
4676452 Nakajima Jun 1987 A
4690066 Morishita et al. Sep 1987 A
4729525 Rumpf Mar 1988 A
4826150 Minoura May 1989 A
4846313 Sharp Jul 1989 A
4895317 Rumpf et al. Jan 1990 A
4938435 Varner et al. Jul 1990 A
4957644 Price et al. Sep 1990 A
4974706 Maji et al. Dec 1990 A
5054587 Matsui et al. Oct 1991 A
5064029 Araki et al. Nov 1991 A
5084640 Morris et al. Jan 1992 A
5205386 Goodman et al. Apr 1993 A
5248133 Okamoto et al. Sep 1993 A
5272938 Hsu et al. Dec 1993 A
5342000 Berges et al. Aug 1994 A
5392881 Cho et al. Feb 1995 A
5441137 Organek et al. Aug 1995 A
5465815 Ikegami Nov 1995 A
5477093 Lamb Dec 1995 A
5483849 Orii et al. Jan 1996 A
5495131 Goldie et al. Feb 1996 A
5636804 Jeung Jun 1997 A
5692693 Yamaguchi Dec 1997 A
5711404 Lee Jan 1998 A
5712520 Lamb Jan 1998 A
5722612 Feathers Mar 1998 A
5742986 Corrion et al. Apr 1998 A
5779178 McCarty Jul 1998 A
5791584 Kuroiwa Aug 1998 A
5822874 Nemes Oct 1998 A
5862891 Kröger et al. Jan 1999 A
5928300 Rogers et al. Jul 1999 A
6041897 Saumweber et al. Mar 2000 A
6042517 Gunther et al. Mar 2000 A
6051897 Wissler et al. Apr 2000 A
6062350 Spieldiener et al. May 2000 A
6086005 Kobayashi et al. Jul 2000 A
6209688 Kuwahara Apr 2001 B1
6220403 Kobayashi et al. Apr 2001 B1
6279682 Feathers Aug 2001 B1
6293376 Pribonic Sep 2001 B1
6412611 Pribonic Jul 2002 B1
6460828 Gersemsky et al. Oct 2002 B1
6466119 Drew Oct 2002 B1
6523650 Pribonic et al. Feb 2003 B1
6533083 Pribonic et al. Mar 2003 B1
6557673 Desta et al. May 2003 B1
6561451 Steinich May 2003 B1
6659237 Pribonic Dec 2003 B1
6756870 Kuwahara Jun 2004 B2
6793203 Heinrichs et al. Sep 2004 B2
6810997 Schreiber et al. Nov 2004 B2
6918469 Pribonic et al. Jul 2005 B1
6962235 Leon Nov 2005 B2
6973999 Ikuta et al. Dec 2005 B2
7011607 Kolda et al. Mar 2006 B2
7014026 Drussel Mar 2006 B2
7018324 Lin Mar 2006 B1
7279055 Schuler Oct 2007 B2
7281612 Hsieh Oct 2007 B2
7281620 Wolner et al. Oct 2007 B2
7513334 Calver Apr 2009 B2
7528514 Cruz et al. May 2009 B2
7984796 Pribonic Jul 2011 B2
8037978 Boren Oct 2011 B1
8272476 Hartman et al. Sep 2012 B2
8424460 Lerner et al. Apr 2013 B2
8490751 Allington et al. Jul 2013 B2
8511434 Blomberg Aug 2013 B2
8556234 Hartman et al. Oct 2013 B2
8567561 Strasser et al. Oct 2013 B2
8601951 Lerner Dec 2013 B2
8851235 Allington et al. Oct 2014 B2
9016435 Allington et al. Apr 2015 B2
9199103 Hetrich et al. Dec 2015 B2
9242128 Macy Jan 2016 B2
20020162477 Palumbo Nov 2002 A1
20020179372 Schreiber et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030116391 Desta et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030168911 Anwar Sep 2003 A1
20030211914 Perkins et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040055836 Pribonic et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040073346 Roelleke Apr 2004 A1
20040168855 Leon Sep 2004 A1
20040191401 Bytnar et al. Sep 2004 A1
20050051659 Wolner et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050082410 Tanaka et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050117258 Ohta et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050189830 Corbin, III et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050263356 Marzano et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060219498 Organek et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060278478 Pribonic et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070000741 Pribonic et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070001048 Wooster et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070135561 Rath et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070228202 Scharf et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070228713 Takemura Oct 2007 A1
20070256906 Jin et al. Nov 2007 A1
20080059028 Willerton Mar 2008 A1
20080074223 Pribonic Mar 2008 A1
20080087510 Pribonic Apr 2008 A1
20080105503 Pribonic May 2008 A1
20080106420 Rohlf May 2008 A1
20080135579 Bertram et al. Jun 2008 A1
20090026303 Schmitz et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090032785 Jones Feb 2009 A1
20090084883 Casebolt et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090114892 Lesko May 2009 A1
20090166459 Niitsuma et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090178887 Reeves et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090211846 Taylor Aug 2009 A1
20090319212 Cech et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100032255 Conti et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100065373 Stone et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100112224 Lott May 2010 A1
20100116922 Choate et al. May 2010 A1
20100211239 Christensen et al. Aug 2010 A1
20110084158 Meillet et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110114907 Hartman et al. May 2011 A1
20110147125 Blomberg Jun 2011 A1
20110166744 Lu et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110174914 Yang Jul 2011 A1
20110175473 Kitabatake et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110240403 Meillet Oct 2011 A1
20110297778 Meillet et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120055740 Allington et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120118670 Olson et al. May 2012 A1
20120312540 Lefebvre Dec 2012 A1
20130048422 Hartman et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130087433 Sejourne Apr 2013 A1
20130118842 Lerner May 2013 A1
20130186721 Bogdanowicz et al. Jul 2013 A1
20140048639 Allington et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140110947 Mongeau Apr 2014 A1
20140224597 Takezawa et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140346909 Vogler et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140375158 Allington et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150196820 Allington et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150266454 McGowan Sep 2015 A1
20150352380 Huang et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160052401 McGowan et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160317936 Diehl et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160360738 Richardson Dec 2016 A1
20170237313 Diehl et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170244313 Diehl et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170274261 Allington et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170338728 Diehl et al. Nov 2017 A1
20180245658 Diehl Aug 2018 A1
20180264296 Diehl et al. Sep 2018 A1
20180269767 Diehl et al. Sep 2018 A1
20180269768 Diehl et al. Sep 2018 A1
20180269769 Allington et al. Sep 2018 A1
20180370484 Diehl et al. Dec 2018 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (60)
Number Date Country
1783674 Jun 2006 CN
101820952 Sep 2010 CN
202203305 Apr 2012 CN
102497085 Jun 2012 CN
102627063 Aug 2012 CN
103244577 Aug 2013 CN
103326538 Sep 2013 CN
93 00 966 Mar 1993 DE
10 2005 032 694 Jan 2007 DE
0 247 818 Dec 1987 EP
0 460 494 Dec 1991 EP
0 909 684 Apr 1999 EP
1 094 240 Apr 2001 EP
1 401 087 Mar 2004 EP
1 432 101 Jun 2004 EP
1 480 320 Nov 2004 EP
1 564 868 Aug 2005 EP
1 244 565 Jul 2006 EP
721748 Jan 1955 GB
908128 Oct 1962 GB
2 340 461 Feb 2000 GB
2 352 644 Feb 2001 GB
2 352 645 Feb 2001 GB
2 352 784 Feb 2001 GB
2 357 563 Jun 2001 GB
49-097163 Sep 1974 JP
S53-113528 Sep 1978 JP
56-107092 Aug 1981 JP
58-25152 Feb 1983 JP
60-259278 Dec 1985 JP
63-64542 Mar 1988 JP
H05-72684 Mar 1993 JP
5-296287 Nov 1993 JP
H05-84347 Nov 1993 JP
8-252025 Oct 1996 JP
10-98868 Apr 1998 JP
10-140536 May 1998 JP
H10-178717 Jun 1998 JP
10-304799 Nov 1998 JP
11-119680 Apr 1999 JP
11-189701 Jul 1999 JP
11-315662 Nov 1999 JP
2000-189530 Jul 2000 JP
2000-316272 Nov 2000 JP
2001-17041 Jan 2001 JP
2005-353123 Dec 2005 JP
2012-152316 Aug 2012 JP
106 462 Jul 2011 RU
9616496 Jun 1995 WO
9617149 Jun 1996 WO
9847215 Oct 1998 WO
0138123 May 2001 WO
03055560 Jul 2003 WO
2007060053 May 2007 WO
2008139127 Nov 2008 WO
2009013497 Jan 2009 WO
2009047469 Apr 2009 WO
2009108040 Sep 2009 WO
2009127142 Oct 2009 WO
2010104405 Sep 2010 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (25)
Entry
Extended European Search Report, dated Jul. 11, 2017, for European Application No. 14872681.3-1809, 10 pages.
Extended European Search Report, dated Mar. 29, 2018, for European Application No. 15834380.6-1201, 12 pages.
Extended European Search Report, dated Apr. 6, 2018, for European Application No. 15864540.8-1201, 26 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Apr. 1, 2016, for International Application No. PCT/NZ2015/050206, 9 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Feb. 13, 2009, for International Application No. PCT/US2008/087863, 15 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Feb. 23, 2011, for International Application No. PCT/NZ2010/000011, 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Feb. 24, 2016, for International Application No. PCT/NZ2015/050207, 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Jan. 29, 2016, for International Application No. PCT/NZ2015/050208, 11 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Mar. 11, 2015, for International Application No. PCT/NZ2014/000245, 8 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Mar. 18, 2016, for International Application No. PCT/NZ2015/050209, 14 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Mar. 29, 2016, for International Application No. PCT/NZ2015/050205, 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Nov. 11, 2015, for International Application No. PCT/NZ2015/050114, 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Nov. 18, 2015, for International Application No. PCT/NZ2015/050113, 9 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Oct. 26, 2015, for International Application No. PCT/NZ2015/050115, 10 pages.
MSA Safety Incorporated, Auto Belay Stop Use Notice, Oct. 15, 2009, URL=http://verticalendeavors.com/minneapolis/auto-belay-stop-us-notice/, download date Apr. 6, 2017, 2 pages.
North Safety Products Europe B.V., “Climbing Wall Descender: FP2/5**GDD,” Climbing Wall Descent Controllers Instruction Manual v3, Aug. 18, 2008, 20 pages.
Trublue Auto Belays, Model TB150-12C Operator Manual, Jun. 20, 2013, 37 pages.
Final Office Action, dated Feb. 28, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/464,255, Allington et al., “Braking Mechanisms,” 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance, dated Jul. 21, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/255,625, Allington et al., “Braking Mechanisms,” 11 pages.
Office Action, dated Aug. 22, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/464,255, Allington et al., “Braking Mechanisms,” 5 pages.
Office Action, dated Feb. 20, 2018, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/464,255, Allington et al., “Braking Mechanisms,” 15 pages.
Office Action, dated Jan. 17, 2018, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/586,111, Allington et al., “Braking Mechanisms,” 15 pages.
Office Action, dated Jan. 9, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/255,625, Allington et al., “Braking Mechanisms,” 9 pages.
Office Action, dated Jul. 25, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/464,255, Allington et al., “Braking Mechanisms,” 10 pages.
Park et al., “Torque analysis and measurements of a permanent magnet type Eddy current brake with a Halbach magnet array based on analytical magnetic field calculations,” Journal of Applied Physics 115 (17):17E707, 2014. (3 pages).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170328424 A1 Nov 2017 US