Described herein is a system, method of use and Self Retracting Lifeline (SRL) apparatus using the system to control relative speed between members.
The applicant's co-pending and granted patents in the field of eddy current related devices include U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,851,235, 8,490,751, NZ619034, NZ627617, NZ627619, NZ627633, NZ627630 and other equivalents all incorporated herein by reference. NZ627617 in particular, describes a method of achieving a latch operation between elements the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. While the devices described in NZ627617 may be useful, other methods of controlling relative movement and/or braking may also be achieved or at least provide the public with a choice.
Further aspects and advantages of the system, method of use and Self Retracting Lifeline (SRL) apparatus should become apparent from the ensuing description that is given by way of example only.
Described herein is a system, method of use and Self Retracting Lifeline (SRL) apparatus using the system that govern a dynamic response between members causing a halt in relative motion between the members. Magnetic interactions, eddy current drag forces and centrifugal and/or inertial forces may provide various mechanisms of governing movement.
In a first aspect, there is provided a system with at least two members in a kinematic relationship, the system comprising a means of coupling a first member to at least one further member and in doing so causing synchronized relative motion between the members, wherein coupling occurs in response to a prescribed system dynamic response, the dynamic response selected from at least one of:
(a) a particular velocity action of one or more of the members;
(b) a particular acceleration action of one or more of the elements;
(c) a particular jerk action of one or more of the elements.
In a second aspect, there is provided a method of governing relative movement between members by the steps of:
(a) selecting the system substantially as described herein;
(b) applying a motive force on the system causing movement of at least one member in the system;
(c) causing coupling between the members when the prescribed system dynamic response occurs.
In a third aspect, there is provided a Self Retracting Lifeline (SRL) incorporating the system substantially as described herein.
The system, method of use and SRL device described offer the advantage of providing alternative ways of achieving movement control or at least provide the public with a choice.
Further aspects of the system, method of use and SRL device will become apparent from the following description that is given by way of example only and with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
As noted above, described herein is a system, method of use and Self Retracting Lifeline (SRL) apparatus using the system that govern a dynamic response between members causing a halt in relative motion between the members. Magnetic interactions, eddy current drag forces and centrifugal and/or inertial forces may provide various mechanisms of governing movement.
For the purposes of this specification, the term ‘about’ or ‘approximately’ and grammatical variations thereof mean a quantity, level, degree, value, number, frequency, percentage, dimension, size, amount, weight or length that varies by as much as 30, 25, 20, 15, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, or 1% to a reference quantity, level, degree, value, number, frequency, percentage, dimension, size, amount, weight or length.
The term ‘substantially’ or grammatical variations thereof refers to at least about 50%, for example 75%, 85%, 95% or 98%.
The term ‘comprise’ and grammatical variations thereof shall have an inclusive meaning—i.e. that it will be taken to mean an inclusion of not only the listed components it directly references, but also other non-specified components or elements.
The term ‘jerk’ or grammatical variations thereof refers to a change in acceleration, typically a rapid and sudden change in acceleration compared to normal operating parameters.
In a first aspect, there is provided a system with at least two members in a kinematic relationship, the system comprising a means of coupling a first member to at least one further member and in doing so causing synchronized relative motion between the members, wherein coupling occurs in response to a prescribed system dynamic response, the dynamic response selected from at least one of:
(a) a particular velocity action of one or more of the members;
(b) a particular acceleration action of one or more of the elements;
(c) a particular jerk action of one or more of the elements.
The inventors have in effect produced a system relating to coupling members together based on the system dynamic response. The aim is to bring the members into synchronized motion under predetermined conditions.
Coupling between the members may be achieved:
(a) mechanically;
(b) magnetically;
(c) a combination of mechanically and magnetically.
Coupling may occur passively and once coupled the members may be remain coupled or may be releasably coupled. Coupling may instead be achieved via an active means.
The synchronized motion may be a zero absolute velocity or halting effect. This effect for example may be useful where all motion needs to stop, for example in a fall safety apparatus.
Coupling may also be based on, or at least influenced by, eddy current induced drag. This is not essential in the inventors experience but may be useful to further tune the dynamic response characteristics.
In one specific embodiment, coupling between the members may be achieved via mechanical coupling between at least one pawl linked to the first member, the pawl having an oscillatory movement action, and at least one latch member on, or being, the at least one further member, coupling occurring at a speed threshold according to the prescribed system dynamic response.
A bias relationship may exist between the pawl and the latch member, the bias being achieved through use of at least one magnet arranged for attraction, repulsion, or alternating attraction and repulsion, of the pawl.
At least one magnetic element may be located on both the pawl and first member and when rotation of the pawl and first member occurs, a varying bias results and hence oscillatory pawl movement occurs. The pawl may be axially mounted on the first member and the pawl center of gravity may be off set from the pawl axis of rotation thereby further influencing the oscillation effect.
As may be appreciated, the degree of oscillation of the pawl may be varied depending for example on the relative rates of motion of the first member and pawl (or first member and at least one further member.
The pawl dynamic response may be further tuned by varying the inertia of the pawl. As noted above, the center of mass of the pawl may be off set from the pawl axis of rotation assuming the pawl is connected in this manner to the first member. A part or parts of the pawl may be weighted so as to tune the inertia of the pawl to movement thereby tuning the dynamic response of the system.
The system may act as follows:
(a) at a predetermined speed, coupling may occur when the pawl moves to a deployed position for a sufficient time period such that it couples with the latch member; and
(b) at speeds below the predetermined speed, the pawl may not couple.
Coupling may be avoided by having the pawl skip over the latch member—that is the pawl may not be sufficiently deployed to interfere with the latch member. Skipping over may continue until the inertial effects of the pawl are overcome and the pawl deploys sufficiently far to couple with the latch member.
The system may further act so that:
(a) the pawl may remain coupled when the speed of motion is insufficient to overcome the inertial effects of the pawl; and
(b) decoupling may occur when the speed of motion is sufficient to overcome the inertial effects of the pawl.
The degree of bias noted above causing oscillation may be configured to provide the desired dynamic response behavior of the pawl.
In an alternative specific embodiment, coupling between the members may be achieved by a mechanical cam system based on the reaction effects of inertial forces and/or applied drag forces according to the prescribed system dynamic response.
In the above system, the first and at least one further member may be aligned together and the cam feature may be located between the first and at least one further member. In effect, the system has at least two independent but moving members.
The at least one further member may be configured with either or both of inertial characteristics and/or retarding drag due to motion such that it is subject to a slowed motion with respect to the first member when a motive force is applied on the system.
Relative velocity between the first and at least one further member may provide a displacement between the members and may urge the members to separate due to the cam profile prescribed movement path. Separation refers to the members moving apart with respect to each other.
Movement of the at least one further member may cause coupling with a latch member on or about the first member, coupling at least one anchor on the at least one further member to the latch member.
As may be appreciated, coupling of the further member to the latch member also results in coupling indirectly between the first and further member.
Coupling may be achieved via:
(a) a geometric latching interface;
(b) attraction of magnetic poles; or
(c) a combination of a geometric latching interface and attraction of magnetic poles.
In a further specific embodiment, coupling may rely on magnetic forces between the members wherein the magnetic forces between the members are configured to achieve an attraction force between the members, the attraction force being sufficient to slow and halt relative motion between the members resulting in synchronized relative motion according to the prescribed system dynamic response.
The magnetic forces may be imposed by magnetic pole elements acting between the members. For the purposes of this specification, magnetic pole action is termed ‘cogging’. The cogging system may be designed in consideration of the dynamic behavior of the connected system and any peripheral energy absorbing means such that the system achieves a stop and hold action under the intended conditions. The magnetic pole elements may be configured to be ineffective or inactive under predetermined conditions. Variation in magnetic pole action may for example be achieved by varying the separation distance between members or parts thereof containing the magnet or magnets thereby reducing the magnetic interaction forces.
The system above may be a continuously coupled system where an externally applied motive force results in initial movement of the members, but a slow and halt action takes effect immediately between the members provided the motive force is sufficient to induce the prescribed system dynamic response.
As may be appreciated, in the first aspect above and the specific embodiments described, the members may move in a substantially linear kinematic relationship. Alternatively, the members may move in a substantially rotational kinematic relationship. Both actions may be possible and appropriate depending on the device in which the system may be used. Examples given or used herein are described in the rotational embodiment. Linear equivalent embodiments will be obvious to someone skilled in the art.
In a yet further specific embodiment, the members may be in a substantially rotational kinematic relationship and coupling between the members may be achieved via a centrifugal based system designed so that, on application of a motive force of a predetermined magnitude, the members couple together according to the prescribed system dynamic response.
The centrifugal forces acting on the members may be influenced by use of at least one weight or weighted element or part thereof.
The first and at least one further member may be aligned together and the centrifugal feature or features may be located between the first and at least one further member.
Velocity of the members may urge a displacement of the centrifugal feature or features which in turn urges the members to separate due to the centrifugal force imposed on the at least one further member.
Movement of the at least one further member may cause coupling with a latch member on or about the first member, coupling at least one anchor of the at least one further member to the latch member. As may be appreciated, coupling of the further member to the latch member also results in coupling indirectly between the first and further member.
Coupling may be achieved via:
(a) a geometric latching interface;
(b) attraction of magnetic poles; or
(c) a combination of a geometric latching interface and attraction of magnetic poles.
As noted above, the dynamic response may be in one of three ways. In more detail, specific examples of how the three actions might take place may be as follows:
As should be appreciated, the configuration may be varied and the above options should be seen as non-limiting examples only.
In a second aspect, there is provided a method of governing relative movement between members by the steps of:
(a) selecting the system substantially as described herein;
(b) applying a motive force on the system causing movement of at least one member in the system;
(c) causing coupling between the members when the prescribed system dynamic response occurs.
In a third aspect, there is provided a Self Retracting Lifeline (SRL) incorporating the system substantially as described herein.
As noted above, the devices described may be used in SRL devices. The ability to detect and activate a braking element is important for SRL apparatus.
Detection of a fall event is commonly triggered by a mechanism that responds to a change in state of the line. Mechanisms can potentially be triggered by the displacement, velocity, acceleration or jerk (rate of change of acceleration) of the line, or by a combination of these signals.
Existing SRLs commonly make use of velocity or acceleration mechanisms, typically using a ratchet and pawl arrangement to couple the spool to a brake. Either the ratchet plate or the pawl set can be attached to the rotating spool.
A linear configuration may comprise a means of sensing a change in acceleration (jerk) of a carrier (moving element). The carrier may be attached to a rider (braking element) of known mass with a given inertia. When a contact force is applied to the carrier the rider and carrier remain coupled and aligned. A change in the applied force to the carrier (jerk) causes the rider to slip relative to the carrier due to the inertial effects. The inertial effects may then be tracked through displacement between the rider and carrier. When the carrier acceleration changes, the relative displacement between the rider and carrier also changes.
The same principle may be used in a rotational sense. The rider may be free to rotate with the carrier. A change in angular acceleration applied to the carrier may be resolved as a relative angular displacement between the carrier and rider.
Besides SRL applications, the devices and methods may be used for a variety of other applications, non-limiting examples including speed control or load control of:
The system, method of use and SRL device described above offer the advantage of providing alternative ways of achieving movement control beyond for example reliance on centrifugal and/or eddy current forces alone. In addition, the relationship between the parts and the rate at which movement control occurs may also be influenced using the embodiments described herein.
The embodiments described above may also be said broadly to consist in the parts, elements and features referred to or indicated in the specification of the application, individually or collectively, and any or all combinations of any two or more said parts, elements or features, and where specific integers are mentioned herein which have known equivalents in the art to which the embodiments relate, such known equivalents are deemed to be incorporated herein as of individually set forth.
Where specific integers are mentioned herein which have known equivalents in the art to which this invention relates, such known equivalents are deemed to be incorporated herein as if individually set forth.
The above described system, method of use and examples of Self Retracting Lifeline (SRL) apparatus using the devices are now described by reference to specific examples.
General examples are provided below of magnetic latching caused by movement of a braking element.
A bi-stable arrangement can be used in conjunction with a tube and cylinder (plunger) approach described in the applicants co-pending application NZ619034. In this example, as illustrated in
In a further embodiment, a cogging example is illustrated in
Magnetic latching of a braking element can also be configured about a rotational degree of freedom normal to the primary drive axis, in this example being the rotation axis 70 of the braking element 71 relative to the moving element 72 (a rotor).
Relative rotation between the moving and braking elements may also be further influenced by use of inertial or centrifugal forces resulting in differential velocity between the elements. In one embodiment, a differential velocity may be used to drive an axial displacement via a cam path 100 as illustrated in
The axial load required to maintain contact between the two halves in the embodiments shown in
Another arrangement that exploits the combination of cam geometry, inertial response and the eddy current drag force-speed relationship is shown in
As noted above, the ability to detect and activate a braking element is important for SRL apparatus.
Detection of a fall event is commonly triggered by a mechanism that responds to a change in state of the line. Mechanisms can potentially be triggered by the displacement, velocity, acceleration or jerk (rate of change of acceleration) of the line, or by a combination of these signals.
Existing SRLs commonly make use of velocity or acceleration mechanisms, typically using a ratchet and pawl arrangement to couple the spool to a brake. Either the ratchet plate or the pawl set can be attached to the rotating spool.
An art velocity sensitive device can be configured using pawls (braking elements) 110 that are activated by centripetal forces acting against the constraint of a biasing element (spring) 111 as illustrated in
An art acceleration sensitive device can make use of the inertial behavior of the pawl 112 causing rotation of the pawl 112 about its pivot 113 in response to acceleration of the pawl 112 mounting plate. This approach is illustrated in
A jerk sensitive device can be configured by making use of the non-linear shear force capacity that exists between a pair of magnetic poles.
A linear configuration is illustrated in
Aspects of the system, method of use and Self Retracting Lifeline (SRL) apparatus using the system have been described by way of example only and it should be appreciated that modifications and additions may be made thereto without departing from the scope of the claims herein.
These and other changes can be made to the embodiments in light of the above-detailed description. In general, in the following claims, the terms used should not be construed to limit the claims to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification and the claims, but should be construed to include all possible embodiments along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled. Accordingly, the claims are not limited by the disclosure.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
701545 | Dec 2014 | NZ | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/NZ2015/050205 | 12/4/2015 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/089225 | 6/9/2016 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2058024 | Logan, Jr. | Oct 1936 | A |
2122312 | Cassion | Jun 1938 | A |
2122315 | Fosty et al. | Jun 1938 | A |
2272509 | Cavallo | Feb 1942 | A |
2409009 | Bakke | Oct 1946 | A |
2428104 | Winther | Sep 1947 | A |
2437871 | Wood | Mar 1948 | A |
2492776 | Winther | Dec 1949 | A |
2771171 | Schultz | Nov 1956 | A |
2807734 | Lehde | Sep 1957 | A |
3364795 | De Coye De Castelet | Jan 1968 | A |
3447006 | Bair | May 1969 | A |
3721394 | Reiser | Mar 1973 | A |
3868005 | McMillan | Feb 1975 | A |
3934446 | Avitzur | Jan 1976 | A |
3962595 | Eddens | Jun 1976 | A |
3967794 | Fohl | Jul 1976 | A |
4078719 | Durland et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4093186 | Golden | Jun 1978 | A |
4224545 | Powell | Sep 1980 | A |
4271944 | Hanson | Jun 1981 | A |
4306688 | Hechler, IV | Dec 1981 | A |
4416430 | Totten | Nov 1983 | A |
4434971 | Cordrey | Mar 1984 | A |
4544111 | Nakajima | Oct 1985 | A |
4561605 | Nakajima | Dec 1985 | A |
4567963 | Sugimoto | Feb 1986 | A |
4612469 | Muramatsu | Sep 1986 | A |
4676452 | Nakajima | Jun 1987 | A |
4690066 | Morishita et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4729525 | Rumpf | Mar 1988 | A |
4826150 | Minoura | May 1989 | A |
4846313 | Sharp | Jul 1989 | A |
4895317 | Rumpf et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4938435 | Varner et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4957644 | Price et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4974706 | Maji et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5054587 | Matsui et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5064029 | Araki et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5084640 | Morris et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5205386 | Goodman et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5248133 | Okamoto et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5272938 | Hsu et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5342000 | Berges et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5392881 | Cho et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5441137 | Organek et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5465815 | Ikegami | Nov 1995 | A |
5477093 | Lamb | Dec 1995 | A |
5483849 | Orii et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5495131 | Goldie et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5636804 | Jeung | Jun 1997 | A |
5692693 | Yamaguchi | Dec 1997 | A |
5711404 | Lee | Jan 1998 | A |
5712520 | Lamb | Jan 1998 | A |
5722612 | Feathers | Mar 1998 | A |
5742986 | Corrion et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5779178 | McCarty | Jul 1998 | A |
5791584 | Kuroiwa | Aug 1998 | A |
5822874 | Nemes | Oct 1998 | A |
5862891 | Kröger et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5928300 | Rogers et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6041897 | Saumweber et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6042517 | Gunther et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6051897 | Wissler et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6062350 | Spieldiener et al. | May 2000 | A |
6086005 | Kobayashi et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6209688 | Kuwahara | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6220403 | Kobayashi et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6279682 | Feathers | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6293376 | Pribonic | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6412611 | Pribonic | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6460828 | Gersemsky et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6466119 | Drew | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6523650 | Pribonic et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6533083 | Pribonic et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6557673 | Desta et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6561451 | Steinich | May 2003 | B1 |
6659237 | Pribonic | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6756870 | Kuwahara | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6793203 | Heinrichs et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6810997 | Schreiber et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6918469 | Pribonic et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6962235 | Leon | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6973999 | Ikuta et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7011607 | Kolda et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7014026 | Drussel | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7018324 | Lin | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7279055 | Schuler | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7281612 | Hsieh | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7281620 | Wolner et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7513334 | Calver | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7528514 | Cruz et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7984796 | Pribonic | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8037978 | Boren | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8272476 | Hartman et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8424460 | Lerner et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8490751 | Allington et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8511434 | Blomberg | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8556234 | Hartman et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8567561 | Strasser et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8601951 | Lerner | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8851235 | Allington et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9016435 | Allington et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9199103 | Hetrich et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9242128 | Macy | Jan 2016 | B2 |
20020162477 | Palumbo | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020179372 | Schreiber et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030116391 | Desta et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030168911 | Anwar | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030211914 | Perkins et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040055836 | Pribonic et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040073346 | Roelleke | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040168855 | Leon | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040191401 | Bytnar et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050051659 | Wolner et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050082410 | Tanaka et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050117258 | Ohta et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050189830 | Corbin, III et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050263356 | Marzano et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060219498 | Organek et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060278478 | Pribonic et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070000741 | Pribonic et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070001048 | Wooster et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070135561 | Rath et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070228202 | Scharf et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070228713 | Takemura | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070256906 | Jin et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080059028 | Willerton | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080074223 | Pribonic | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080087510 | Pribonic | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080105503 | Pribonic | May 2008 | A1 |
20080106420 | Rohlf | May 2008 | A1 |
20080135579 | Bertram et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090026303 | Schmitz et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090032785 | Jones | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090084883 | Casebolt et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090114892 | Lesko | May 2009 | A1 |
20090166459 | Niitsuma et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090178887 | Reeves et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090211846 | Taylor | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090319212 | Cech et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100032255 | Conti et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100065373 | Stone et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100112224 | Lott | May 2010 | A1 |
20100116922 | Choate et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100211239 | Christensen et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110084158 | Meillet et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110114907 | Hartman et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110147125 | Blomberg | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110166744 | Lu et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110174914 | Yang | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110175473 | Kitabatake et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110240403 | Meillet | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110297778 | Meillet et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120055740 | Allington et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120118670 | Olson et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120312540 | Lefebvre | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130048422 | Hartman et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130087433 | Sejourne | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130118842 | Lerner | May 2013 | A1 |
20130186721 | Bogdanowicz et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20140048639 | Allington et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140110947 | Mongeau | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140224597 | Takezawa et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140346909 | Vogler et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140375158 | Allington et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150196820 | Allington et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150266454 | McGowan | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150352380 | Huang et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160052401 | McGowan et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160317936 | Diehl et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160360738 | Richardson | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170237313 | Diehl et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170244313 | Diehl et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170274261 | Allington et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170338728 | Diehl et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180245658 | Diehl | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180264296 | Diehl et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180269767 | Diehl et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180269768 | Diehl et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180269769 | Allington et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180370484 | Diehl et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1783674 | Jun 2006 | CN |
101820952 | Sep 2010 | CN |
202203305 | Apr 2012 | CN |
102497085 | Jun 2012 | CN |
102627063 | Aug 2012 | CN |
103244577 | Aug 2013 | CN |
103326538 | Sep 2013 | CN |
93 00 966 | Mar 1993 | DE |
10 2005 032 694 | Jan 2007 | DE |
0 247 818 | Dec 1987 | EP |
0 460 494 | Dec 1991 | EP |
0 909 684 | Apr 1999 | EP |
1 094 240 | Apr 2001 | EP |
1 401 087 | Mar 2004 | EP |
1 432 101 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1 480 320 | Nov 2004 | EP |
1 564 868 | Aug 2005 | EP |
1 244 565 | Jul 2006 | EP |
721748 | Jan 1955 | GB |
908128 | Oct 1962 | GB |
2 340 461 | Feb 2000 | GB |
2 352 644 | Feb 2001 | GB |
2 352 645 | Feb 2001 | GB |
2 352 784 | Feb 2001 | GB |
2 357 563 | Jun 2001 | GB |
49-097163 | Sep 1974 | JP |
S53-113528 | Sep 1978 | JP |
56-107092 | Aug 1981 | JP |
58-25152 | Feb 1983 | JP |
60-259278 | Dec 1985 | JP |
63-64542 | Mar 1988 | JP |
H05-72684 | Mar 1993 | JP |
5-296287 | Nov 1993 | JP |
H05-84347 | Nov 1993 | JP |
8-252025 | Oct 1996 | JP |
10-98868 | Apr 1998 | JP |
10-140536 | May 1998 | JP |
H10-178717 | Jun 1998 | JP |
10-304799 | Nov 1998 | JP |
11-119680 | Apr 1999 | JP |
11-189701 | Jul 1999 | JP |
11-315662 | Nov 1999 | JP |
2000-189530 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2000-316272 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2001-17041 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2005-353123 | Dec 2005 | JP |
2012-152316 | Aug 2012 | JP |
106 462 | Jul 2011 | RU |
9616496 | Jun 1995 | WO |
9617149 | Jun 1996 | WO |
9847215 | Oct 1998 | WO |
0138123 | May 2001 | WO |
03055560 | Jul 2003 | WO |
2007060053 | May 2007 | WO |
2008139127 | Nov 2008 | WO |
2009013497 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2009047469 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2009108040 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2009127142 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2010104405 | Sep 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report, dated Jul. 11, 2017, for European Application No. 14872681.3-1809, 10 pages. |
Extended European Search Report, dated Mar. 29, 2018, for European Application No. 15834380.6-1201, 12 pages. |
Extended European Search Report, dated Apr. 6, 2018, for European Application No. 15864540.8-1201, 26 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Apr. 1, 2016, for International Application No. PCT/NZ2015/050206, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Feb. 13, 2009, for International Application No. PCT/US2008/087863, 15 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Feb. 23, 2011, for International Application No. PCT/NZ2010/000011, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Feb. 24, 2016, for International Application No. PCT/NZ2015/050207, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Jan. 29, 2016, for International Application No. PCT/NZ2015/050208, 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Mar. 11, 2015, for International Application No. PCT/NZ2014/000245, 8 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Mar. 18, 2016, for International Application No. PCT/NZ2015/050209, 14 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Mar. 29, 2016, for International Application No. PCT/NZ2015/050205, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Nov. 11, 2015, for International Application No. PCT/NZ2015/050114, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Nov. 18, 2015, for International Application No. PCT/NZ2015/050113, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Oct. 26, 2015, for International Application No. PCT/NZ2015/050115, 10 pages. |
MSA Safety Incorporated, Auto Belay Stop Use Notice, Oct. 15, 2009, URL=http://verticalendeavors.com/minneapolis/auto-belay-stop-us-notice/, download date Apr. 6, 2017, 2 pages. |
North Safety Products Europe B.V., “Climbing Wall Descender: FP2/5**GDD,” Climbing Wall Descent Controllers Instruction Manual v3, Aug. 18, 2008, 20 pages. |
Trublue Auto Belays, Model TB150-12C Operator Manual, Jun. 20, 2013, 37 pages. |
Final Office Action, dated Feb. 28, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/464,255, Allington et al., “Braking Mechanisms,” 10 pages. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jul. 21, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/255,625, Allington et al., “Braking Mechanisms,” 11 pages. |
Office Action, dated Aug. 22, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/464,255, Allington et al., “Braking Mechanisms,” 5 pages. |
Office Action, dated Feb. 20, 2018, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/464,255, Allington et al., “Braking Mechanisms,” 15 pages. |
Office Action, dated Jan. 17, 2018, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/586,111, Allington et al., “Braking Mechanisms,” 15 pages. |
Office Action, dated Jan. 9, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/255,625, Allington et al., “Braking Mechanisms,” 9 pages. |
Office Action, dated Jul. 25, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/464,255, Allington et al., “Braking Mechanisms,” 10 pages. |
Park et al., “Torque analysis and measurements of a permanent magnet type Eddy current brake with a Halbach magnet array based on analytical magnetic field calculations,” Journal of Applied Physics 115 (17):17E707, 2014. (3 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170328424 A1 | Nov 2017 | US |