The present invention relates to latch assemblies, and in particular latch assemblies for use with car doors and car boots.
Latch assemblies are known to releasably secure car doors in a closed position. Operation of an inside door handle or an outside door handle would release the latch, allowing the door to open. Subsequent closure of the door will automatically relatch the latch. Electric actuators are commonly employed in car latches in order to release them. Known latches incorporate a rotatable claw which engages with a striker mounted on an opposing surface (for example, a car door frame) in order to retain the door in a closed position. This rotating claw is often held in position by a pawl, which is also often a rotating component. Release of the claw is thereby achieved by rotating the pawl from an engaged position, whereby it engages and retains the claw, to a disengaged position, whereby the claw is free to rotate. Movement of the pawl is often undertaken by electric actuators. It is desirable to reduce the amount of force required to move the pawl from an engaged position to a disengaged position such that the size of the electric actuator can be reduced, thereby reducing weight and part cost.
Simple known latch assemblies include a pawl that is mounted to rotate about a single axis. Such pawls are rotatably mounted on a substantially cylindrical pawl pivot pin inserted into a circular pawl pin orifice in the pawl. The pawl pivot pin is fixed to a stationary latch chassis. The pawl pivot pin has to be of a certain radius in order to withstand loads that the latch may undergo during normal operation and also during high load impact events.
A problem with this type of known latch is that a radius of the pawl pivot pin, which as described must be of a certain magnitude to withstand loads, is directly related to the size of the contact area between the pawl and said pawl pivot pin. This is problematic as the amount of friction between these two components is influenced by the amount of dust and contaminants that may accrue between them. Therefore, as the contact surface area is increased, the levels of friction inherent within the latch in use is also increased, and a greater actuation force is required to overcome such friction. Therefore, larger and more expensive actuators are required which is undesirable.
GB2409706 shows an example of a low energy release latch 100 (as shown in
WO/2006/087578 discloses a device (see
It can be clearly seen in WO/2006/087578 that the radius on which the first pawl 16 rotates about a crank pin 54 is necessarily large in order to encompass a cylindrical pin 56 (see
Such a large radius of rotation means that a perimeter of a pivot hole 46 is significant. Typically, the radius of the pivot hole 46 is in the order of 9 millimeters or more. This is problematic as dust contamination can cause excessive friction between the first pawl 16 and the crankshaft 50, increasing the effort required to rotate them relative to each other. This is undesirable as larger actuators are required to rotate the two components relative to each other.
Any attempt to reduce the radius of the crankshaft 50 to distances below the minimum required radius rmin would result in significant weakening of the crankshaft and consequently likely failure of this component.
Referring to FIG. 1 of WO/2006/087578, a torque is applied to an eccentric 54 as the line of action of force FP is offset from an axis A. The size of the lever arm at which this torque is applied is determined by the start angle of the eccentric 54 (i.e., in the closed position). By way of explaining what is meant by “start angle”, at start angles of 0 and 180 degrees, the eccentric 54 is at top dead center (unstable equilibrium) and bottom dead center (stable equilibrium), respectively. As the angle tends towards 90 degrees, the lever arm increases to a maximum, and the maximum torque for a given force FP is applied to the eccentric.
As the start angle decreases, the lever arm producing the torque on the eccentric 54 decreases. As such, if the angle is too low (i.e., below a minimum backdrive angle), the torque produced by the lever arm and the force FP will be insufficient to overcome the friction in the system, rotate the eccentric 54, and open the latch. In known latch arrangements, the start angle must be above the minimum backdrive angle, typically in the order of 54 degrees.
This minimum backdrive angle is indicative of the friction inherent in the latch assembly and therefore of the torque required to open the latch assembly. If it is reduced, a lower torque is sufficient to open the latch. This is beneficial as less effort is therefore required to release and latch the latch.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a lower energy release latch by overcoming the above disadvantages.
According to a first aspect of the present invention, there is provided a latch assembly having a chassis, a latch bolt movably mounted on the chassis and having a closed position for retaining a striker and an open position for releasing the striker, and a pawl having an engaged position at which the pawl is engaged with the latch bolt to hold the latch bolt in the closed position and a disengaged position at which the pawl is disengaged from the latch bolt, thereby allowing the latch bolt to move to the open position. The pawl is rotatably mounted via a pawl pivot pin about a pawl axis, and the pawl pivot pin includes a first arcuate portion having a first radius about the pawl axis. A cross-sectional area of the pawl pivot pin, taken perpendicular to the pawl axis, is greater than an area of a circle having the first radius.
By having a pawl pivot pin cross sectional area substantially greater than the area of the circle having the radius of the first arcuate portion, it is possible to have a first arcuate portion of relatively small radius without compromising the strength of the pawl pivot pin. This lower radius of the first arcuate portion means that the detrimental effect of dust and contaminants is reduced, as the mating area between the pawl pivot pin and the surface against which it rotates is reduced. This also reduces the minimum backdrive angle compared to known latches.
In one example, the pawl pivot pin is mounted in a pawl pin orifice including a second arcuate portion having a second radius about the pawl axis, substantially similar to the first radius, and in which a cross-sectional area of the pawl pin orifice, taken perpendicular to the pawl axis, is greater than a area of a circle having the second radius.
The arrangement may use a “live” pivot (i.e., in which the pawl pivot pin is connected to the pawl and the pawl pin orifice is defined in an adjacent component, e.g., the chassis or an eccentric) or a “dead” pivot (in which the pawl pivot pin is connected to the chassis or the eccentric and the pawl pin orifice is defined in the pawl).
According to a second aspect of the present invention, there is provided a latch assembly having a chassis, a latch bolt movably mounted on the chassis and having a closed position for retaining a striker and an open position for releasing the striker, and a pawl having an engaged position at which the pawl is engaged with the latch bolt to hold the latch bolt in the closed position and a disengaged position at which the pawl is disengaged from the latch bolt, thereby allowing the latch bolt to move to the open position. The pawl is rotatably mounted via a pawl pivot pin about a pawl axis, and the pawl pivot pin is rotatably mounted in a pawl pin orifice including a pawl pin orifice arcuate portion having a second radius about the pawl axis. A cross-sectional area of the pawl pin orifice, taken perpendicular to the pawl axis, is greater than an area of a circle having the second radius.
By making the cross sectional area of the pawl pin orifice greater than that of a circle having the radius of the second arcuate portion, it is ensured that less than an entire perimeter of the pawl pivot pin is in contact with the pawl pin orifice. Therefore, the contact area between the pawl pivot pin and the pawl pin orifice is reduced compared to known arrangements, and as such, the effect of dust and contaminants is reduced. Furthermore, the fact that the area of the pawl pin orifice is significantly larger than the area of the pawl pivot pin leaves a gap from which dust and contaminants can escape and be ejected from the mechanism. In this manner, the amount of friction in the latch is reduced, and consequently, the size of the actuators may also be reduced. Furthermore, the likelihood of the latch becoming stuck or jammed because of friction arising from dust or contaminants is also reduced.
The invention will now be described by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
With reference to
The major components of the latch chassis 12 are a retention plate 20 and a backplate 23 (only shown partially in
The retention plate 20 further includes a mouth 34 for receiving the striker 24. Furthermore, the retention plate 20 further includes threaded holes 36 which in use are used to secure the latch assembly 10 to the door 8.
The rotating claw 14 is mounted rotatably about the claw pivot pin 26 and includes a mouth 32 for receiving the striker 24. The rotating claw 14 further includes a first safety abutment 38 and a closed abutment 40.
The pawl 16 is generally planar and includes a claw abutment 46 and a chassis abutment 48. The pawl 16 further includes a pawl pivot pin orifice 50. The pawl pivot pin orifice 50 includes a second arcuate portion 58 of a radius B and a third arcuate portion 60 of radius C. Referring to
There is also provided an actuator 62 (shown schematically) connected to an actuator rod 64, which is in turn connected to the pawl 16. Actuation of the actuator 62 retracts the actuator rod 64 such that the pawl 16 rotates in a clockwise direction against the bias of a spring 66.
The pawl 16 returns to a rest position after the closed abutment 40 of the rotating claw 14 has rotated past the claw abutment 46 of the pawl 16. In this case, the rest position is as shown in the dotted line i.e., it is the same as the closed position. The return to the closed position is aided by the spring 66. Alternatively or additionally, the actuator 62 could act in a reverse direction in order to allow the pawl 16 to return to its rest position.
As the striker 24 moves further to the left in
Comparing
Referring now to
It will also be noted that if the radius D of a known pawl pivot pin 19 was simply reduced, then the required strength would not be achieved in order to resist the loading requirements of the latch assembly 9. The present invention overcomes this problem by providing a pawl pivot pin 18 of significant size with the cylindrical body 52 and the lug 54 on which the first arcuate portion 56 is defined. Therefore, the pawl pivot pin 18 is able to resist the required loading, while also reducing the frictional forces between the pawl pivot pin 18 and the pawl 16.
The latch assembly 110 includes a pawl 116 substantially identical to the pawl 16 of the latch assembly 10. However, a pawl pivot pin 168 differs from the pawl pivot pin 18 in that it is rotatably mounted on a latch chassis 112 such that it is able to rotate about a pivot axis Y (as mentioned above, the pawl pivot pin 18 is non-rotatably fixed to the latch chassis 12). Referring to
As shown in
In the closed position as shown in
The resulting motion of the pawl 116 moves the claw abutment 146 out of engagement with the closed abutment 140, thus allowing the claw 114 to rotate in a clockwise sense and release the striker 124.
As can be seen in
The moveable abutment 174 has also been returned to its original position in order to constrain the lever 172. It will be noted that pawl axis X is in the same position in
As there is no force G acting on the pawl 116, the pawl 116 is kept in position via the bias of a spring 166 holding a chassis abutment 148 against a stop pin 130. It will be noted that during release of the latch assembly 110, the chassis abutment 148 and the stop pin 130 are in constant contact, and in fact, the pawl 116 is able to rotate about the contact point between these two components.
Referring to
It will be appreciated that for the reasons described with respect to the latch assembly 10, the friction involved in rotating the pawl 116 relative to the pawl pivot pin 168 in the latch assembly 110 is significantly reduced. Therefore, opening of the latch assembly 110 (i.e., movement from the position shown in
It will also be appreciated that these benefits come through the reduction in the radius A of a first arcuate portion 156 on a lug 154, as shown in
The reduction in friction in the system results in a reduction in the aforementioned minimum backdrive angle. The start angle of the latch assembly 110 is indicated at H in
It will be appreciated that the latch assembly 110 is an arrangement in which the force G acts to the left of pivot axis Y in
A latch assembly 210 is substantially similar to the latch assembly 110 and common features have reference numerals 100 greater. The main difference between the latch assembly 110 and the latch assembly 210 is that a pawl pivot pin orifice 282 and a lug 284 are oriented differently to a pawl pivot pin orifice 150 and the lug 154. In this way, the latch assembly 210 is configured such that a force F acting from a striker 224 produces a force G resulting from the interaction between a closed abutment 240 and a claw abutment 246 such that the force G acts directly through both the pawl axis X and the pivot axis Y. As such, a pawl pivot pin 218 acts as a crank arm at a top dead center position i.e., in unstable equilibrium. No resulting torque is felt on either a pawl 216 or the pawl pivot pin 218 as a result of the force G, however movement of the force G to either side of the pivot axis Y will result in a torque being produced on the pawl 216.
Referring to
In order to release the latch assembly 210, the actuator 286 is actuated such that the actuator member 288 rotates the lever 272 in a counter-clockwise direction when viewing
The latch assembly 210 is closed in substantially the same was as the latch assembly 110. It should be noted that as well as an arrangement whereby the pawl pivot pin 218 is held at top dead center as shown in
As described with the latch assemblies 10 and 110, the latch assembly 210 exhibits the same beneficial effects of the presence of the lug 284. Generally, latch friction is reduced, and as such, the latch assembly 210 is easier to operate, requiring smaller actuators thereby reducing latch size.
It will be noted that the relative sizes of the pawl pivot pin 18, 168, 218 and the pawl pivot pin orifice 50, 150, 282 can be varied to both permit and limit the relative motion between the pawl pivot pin and the pawl 16, 116, 216. As seen in all of the above embodiments and specifically with reference to the latch assembly 10, the pawl pivot pin 18 contacts the pawl 16 at a contact point 21 distant from the lug 54. The contact point 21 is able to slide across the third arcuate portion 60 in order to increase stability of the latch assembly 210 and prevent excessive relative movement between the pawl pivot pin 18 and the pawl 16.
Referring to
The toggle member 318 includes a toggle abutment 326, which engages a moveable abutment 328 mounted onto the latch chassis 312 via an actuator 330 to rotate about an abutment axis Z. The pawl 322 and the toggle member 318 are biased into the position shown in
In the present embodiment, there is provided a pawl pin orifice 334 in the shape of an obround with opposing end semi circle portions 336 of diameter substantially equal to a diameter of the pawl pivot pin 324. The pawl pin orifice 334 further includes a neck 338 of a width that is substantially less than a diameter of the pawl pivot pin 324. As such, the pawl pivot pin 324 is held in position relative to the pawl 322. This can be seen in comparing
It can be clearly seen that the contact area between the pawl pivot pin 324 and the pawl pin orifice 334 is substantially less than if the pawl pin orifice was circular. As such, the frictional effect of dust and contaminants in this rotational joint is substantially reduced, and effort required to open and close the latch is also reduced. No reduction in the necessary size of the pawl pivot pin 324 has been made, only an increase in the size of the pawl pin orifice 334. It should also be noted that the action of rotation of the pawl pivot pin 324 in the pawl pin orifice 334 will tend to force dust and contaminants from the mating areas of the two components into the empty parts of the pawl pin orifice 334 proximate the neck 338.
All of the above embodiments utilize dead pivots; i.e., the pawl includes a pawl pin orifice in which the pawl pivot pin rotates relative to the pawl. In such devices, the pawl pin orifice is defined in the pawl. The present invention also extends to live pivot arrangements; i.e., where the pawl pivot pin is fixably mounted to, or integral with, the pawl so it cannot rotate or otherwise move relative to the pawl. The pawl pin orifice is therefore defined in the component on which the pawl is rotatably mounted (e.g., the latch chassis, eccentric or toggle).
The latch assembly 410 as seen in
In operation, the latch assembly 410 operates in substantially the same way as the latch assembly 10, with the exception that the pawl pivot pin 468 rotates relative to the latch retention plate 420, and remains stationary relative to the pawl 416.
A latch subassembly 500 as seen in
An example reset mechanism is shown in
As mentioned, upon opening once the claw 1114 has rotated clockwise with the first safety abutment 1138 passing the pawl 1116, the claw 1114 is then free to rotate to the fully open position as shown in
It will be understood that the pawl pin orifice may be defined in either or both of the retention plate and backplate and for optimum strength will be defined in both.
It is envisaged that other live pivot arrangements fall within the scope of the present invention. For example, the pawl pin orifice could be formed in an eccentric with the pawl pivot pin (integral with the pawl) rotatably mounted therein.
The foregoing description is only exemplary of the principles of the invention. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teachings. It is, therefore, to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than using the example embodiments which have been specifically described. For that reason the following claims should be studied to determine the true scope and content of this invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0703597.5 | Feb 2007 | GB | national |
This application is a United States National Phase Application of PCT Application No. PCT/GB2008/000328 filed Jan. 31, 2008, which claims priority to United Kingdom Application No. GB 0703597.5 filed Feb. 23, 2007.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2008/000328 | 1/31/2008 | WO | 00 | 4/7/2011 |