The present invention relates generally to latch systems. More specifically, the present invention relates to a latch with inertial lock mechanism configured to selectively restrict access into a container.
A large variety of latches exist which include mating mechanical parts that engage to fasten two or more objects or surfaces together while allowing for the regular or eventual separation of the objects or surfaces. For example, a latch may be used to engage a lid to a container, a door to a cupboard, a gate to posts, and so forth. Many latches may additionally include locking mechanisms that are selectively locked to prevent ingress to or egress from the particular objects to which the latches are coupled.
A more complete understanding of the present invention may be derived by referring to the detailed description and claims when considered in connection with the Figures, wherein like reference numbers refer to similar items throughout the Figures, and:
Latches are used on a multitude of enclosures for selectively allowing ingress to or egress from such enclosures. Increasingly, latches are being incorporated with refuse containers in an attempt to prevent animals from accessing food and food-containing refuse placed in these containers by humans. Indeed such refuse often attracts the attention of animals in areas adjacent to animal habitats. Animals, such as bears, have a keen sense of smell and can easily detect food which has been discarded in containers left outdoors such as refuse bins and storage lockers. Once food has been discovered in such areas, the animals often return to these outdoor containers in the hope of finding additional food.
Animals in pursuit of a readily available source of food are problematic to human populated areas. For example, animals sometimes enter homes, garages, or even vehicles in search of food. Some animals, and bears in particular, can do significant property damage due to their size and strength. Furthermore, animals entering human inhabited areas can become injured or killed by moving vehicles, electrical lines, and other human accoutrements. Still further, these animals can lose their wariness towards humans, making them a potential threat to humans. Indeed, allowing bears to get into the garbage is one of the leading causes of bear-human encounters. Thus, to protect people, property, and the animals themselves, it is desirable to inhibit animals from accessing containers in which refuse and food are stored.
Various attempts have been made to prevent animals from getting into outdoor refuse containers and food storage lockers. For example, refuse containers are sometimes stored inside sturdy locked buildings, in roofed chain link enclosures, and so forth. Unfortunately, food refuse in an enclosure still gives off odors that attract bears and other wildlife. Thus, it is critical that such an enclosure be locked and that the enclosure is sufficiently sturdy to dissuade a persistent intruder.
In addition, or alternatively, refuse containers may be outfitted with a latch system to prevent an animal from opening the container. These latch systems can be problematic, however, because they can be difficult for a user to manipulate. Furthermore, these latch systems typically require the user to unlatch and subsequently re-engage the latch after use. If the latch is not re-engaged the container is not protected from animal access. Additionally, some latch systems can still be opened by animals through luck, persistence, or cleverness.
Another approach is to build the container using heavy, reinforcing components designed to inhibit animals from physically damaging the container in order to gain access. These reinforcing components can make the container undesirably heavy and unwieldy to move. In addition, these heavy, reinforcing components can cause premature damage, such as failure of the container hinges after repeated use.
In an effort to control costs associated with refuse collection, many municipalities are implementing “fully-automated collection” techniques. Fully-automated collection involves the use of a truck with an automated, mechanical gripping arm to lift a specially-designed container from the curbside, dump the container contents into the truck, and return the container to the curbside. Such a system typically requires only one person to operate because the truck driver controls the gripping arm from the cab of the truck. In contrast, traditional collection systems require one or two laborers and a driver to collect refuse.
Fully-automated collection relies on the cooperation of the residents to place the refuse containers in the proper location and position for collection. Unless the resident places the refuse container in the proper location at the moment that the truck approaches, a container without a latch system is vulnerable to animals while the container awaits refuse collection. A container with a latch system is also problematic because when the container is placed in the proper location, it must be unlatched so that the contents of the container will be successfully emptied. Accordingly, a container with a disengaged latch system is also vulnerable to animals while the container awaits refuse collection. Alternatively, the refuse vehicle operator may exit the truck to disengage the latch system. However, such a procedure is undesirably inconvenient and time consuming. A container using heavy, reinforcing components may be difficult for a resident to place in the proper location and may not conform with the size, shape, and weight requirements needed to safely function with the automated, mechanical arm.
Embodiments entail a latch system for an enclosure, such as a container with a lid, and an apparatus that includes a container and closure element having the latch system incorporated therein. The latch system includes an inertial lock mechanism that automatically engages so that a user need not deliberately re-engage the latch after manually disengaging it. Additionally, the latch system automatically unlatches when the container is sharply lifted or briefly shaken.
In an example, the latch system is implemented with a container to produce an animal-resistant refuse container. Such a refuse container is useful for receiving and holding garbage, recyclable items, and the like. The refuse container with the latch system incorporated therein is configured to inhibit an animal, and especially large animals such as bears, peccaries, and the like, from accessing the contents of the container. When the container is tilted or tipped, the inertial lock mechanism will remain locked to prevent an animal intruder from access into the container. However, lift action imparted on the container by an automated, mechanical arm of a refuse truck is sufficient to unlock the inertial lock mechanism of the latch system so that the contents of the container can be emptied during automated collection. Although the latch system is directed towards inhibiting access of animals to a refuse container used for automated collection, embodiments of the latch system may be applied to inhibit access of animals in general to containers. Additionally, the latch system may be implemented to allow controlled access to a multitude of container designs, cupboards, gates, and the like.
In an embodiment, apparatus 32 includes two latch systems 20 and, correspondingly, two latch receptacles 42 (
Referring to
Container 34 further includes a circumferential rim 52 encircling opening 48, and passages 54 are formed in circumferential rim 52 of container 34 during the rotational molding manufacturing process. At least a portion of latch system 20 may be housed in each passage 54. Passages 54 function to protect latch system 20 from an animal intruder and from inclement weather conditions. In an embodiment, an interior cavity 56 is formed in circumferential rim 52 and is filled with a foam material 58. Foam material 58 provides reinforcement at circumferential rim 52 in order to withstand damage from teeth and claws of an animal intruder. Container 34 may be further provided with reinforcing areas, relief areas, and so forth to provide the desired strength and stiffness to container 34. In addition, handle supports 60 and handlebar 40 can be integrally-formed with and at the same time as the formation of container 34. Handle supports 60 support the laterally extending cylindrical handlebar 40 to which lid 38 may be pivotally attached.
Referring to
Lid 38 may be slightly convex or dome-shaped. This convex shape produces a cavity 62 in the underside of lid 38 that is surrounded by a circumferential lip 64 of lid 38. Latch receptacles 42 are housed in cavity 62 and may be secured in lid 38 using any of a variety of bracket and/or fastener configurations (not shown). Alternatively, latch receptacles 42 may be integrally formed in lid 38 during fabrication of lid 38. When lid 38 is closed on container 34 (
The following
Swing lever 68 includes a first end 72 and a second end 74, where second end 74 opposes first end 72. First end 72 of swing lever 68 is coupled with first housing element 24 via a pivot shaft 76. Pivot shaft 76 defines a pivot axis 77, i.e., an axis of rotation, about which swing lever 68 is able to pivot. Swing lever 68 further includes gear teeth 78 located at first end 72 proximate pivot shaft 76. Second end 74 of swing lever 68 includes a weight 80 that provides resistance to an acceleration event (discussed below) that causes swing lever 68 to pivot about the pivot point at pivot shaft 76. Latch system 20 further includes a spring 82 having one end 84 coupled to an inner surface 86 of first housing element 24 and another end 88 coupled to swing lever 68.
One end 90 of sear element 70 is coupled with first housing element 24 via another pivot shaft 92. Thus, pivot shaft 92 defines a pivot axis 93 about which sear element 70 can pivot. The opposite end 94 of sear element 72 includes gear teeth 96. Gear teeth 96 of sear element 70 engage with gear teeth 78 of swing lever 68. Thus, when swing lever 68 pivots about pivot axis 77 in one direction, the geared engagement of sear element 70 with swing lever 68 will cause sear element 70 to pivot about pivot axis 93 in the opposite direction. In particular, when latch system 20 is subjected to an acceleration event (discussed below), weight 80 provides resistance to this acceleration event to cause swing lever 68 to pivot about pivot axis 77 and thereby cause sear element 70 to pivot about pivot axis 93. As such, swing lever 68 with weight 80 and sear element 70 are referred to herein as an inertial locking mechanism 95 of latch system 20 that prevents catch member 28 from pivoting under particular circumstances.
First housing element 24 can include additional features. In particular, at least two detents 98 and 100 are formed in inner surface 86 of first housing element 24. In addition, a pivot shaft receiver 102 is formed in inner surface 86. Detents 98 and 100 and pivot shaft receiver 102 function cooperatively with catch member 28 (
Catch member 28 includes a catch pivot 110 configured to engage with pivot shaft receiver 102 (
The perspective view of catch member 28 further reveals an engagement area 122 formed as a notch at a lower region of catch member 28. Engagement area 122 of catch member 28 and latch area 71 (
Now referring to
The exploded perspective view of
Now referring to catch member 28, shown in
Manual actuation lever 30 includes an actuation end 140 configured to extend out of housing 22 (see
Manual actuation lever 30 is coupled to an inner surface 148 of second housing element 26 via a spring 150. For example, a first end 152 of spring 150 is engaged with a post 153 extending outwardly from manual actuation lever 30 and a second end 154 of spring 150 is engaged with a post 156 extending outwardly from inner surface 148 of second housing element 26. Accordingly, after manual actuation lever 30 is manipulated, it will return to its original position through a spring force imparted by way of spring 150.
Manual actuation lever 30 further includes a bumper 158 extending outwardly from a side of lever 30. When latch system 20 is assembled, bumper 158 extends into cavity 105 (
Sear retainer 138 includes post elements 160 shaped to reside in socket areas 162 of second housing element 26. A spring 164 is installed between inner surface 148 of second housing element 26 and sear retainer 138 so that sear retainer 138 is biased outwardly from inner surface 148. As such, when latch system 20 is assembled, sear retainer 138 is spring biased to move toward lateral surface 134 (
Latch system 20 has a number of operational modes or positions. In one operational mode, inertial locking mechanism 95 (
Referring to
When spring lever 68 pivots in, for example, a counterclockwise direction 172, about pivot axis 77 at pivot shaft 76, sear element 70 moves commensurately, in the opposite direction, e.g., a clockwise direction 174, about pivot axis 93 at pivot shaft 92 due to the geared engagement of gear teeth 78 on spring lever 68 with gear teeth 96 (see
The locked position 168 of inertial locking mechanism 95 and the resulting latch position 176 of catch member 28 will occur when closure element 38 (
In response to acceleration event 182, swing lever 68 pivots in clockwise direction 174 as a result of the presence of weight 80 located distally from the pivot axis at pivot shaft 76. That is, weight 80 on swing lever 68 tends to stay in its rest position relative to latch system 20 within apparatus 32 (
At the bottom of the swing lever's 68 stroke, i.e., at its maximum amount of movement in clockwise direction 174, sear retainer 138 snaps into a position between catch member 28 and sear element 70 so that sear element 70 and swing lever 68 are temporarily prevented from returning to locked position 168. It should be recalled that spring loaded plunger 118 (
Referring to
However, as now represented by
As catch member 28 swings, i.e., pivots about pivot axis 111, from latch position 176 (
When apparatus 32 is returned to its upright position, closure element 38 closes and latch receptacle 42 strikes catch member 28. The force from latch receptacle 42 causes catch member 28 to engage with latch receptacle 42 and rotate about pivot axis 111 back to latch position 176 (
It should be recalled that first housing element 24 includes detents 98 and 100 (
In order to initiate a manual release, actuation end 140 of manual actuation lever 30 is manipulated by a user, as indicated by an arrow 188. The manipulation of manual actuation lever 30 causes lever 30 to pivot about pivot axis 147 at pivot member 144 so as to move engagement end 142 of manual activation lever 30 into contact with swing lever 68. Swing lever 68 is thus urged to pivot in clockwise direction 174 so that sear element 70 pivots in counterclockwise direction 172 again causing sear element 70 to move out of engagement with catch member 28, thereby releasing catch member 28 and enabling catch member 28 to move to release position 184 (
Apparatus 32 (
Referring to
Bumper 158 of manual actuation lever 30 extends into cavity 105 of pocket 106. When apparatus 32 is in an upright position, ball 128 rolls to the bottommost position within cavity 105 due to the effect of gravity. Thus, bumper 158 is able to move over ball 128 in pocket 106 when actuation end 140 of manual actuation lever 30 is manipulated by a user, as discussed above in connection with
When apparatus 32 is moved away from the upright position, for example, when apparatus 32 is tipped over, ball 128 rolls to the lowermost intermediate position within cavity 105 of pocket 106. In such a position, when actuation end 140 of manual actuation lever 30 is manipulated by, for example, a raccoon, bumper 158 abuts or strikes ball 128. Therefore, manual actuation lever 30 is prevented from movement so that any possible manipulation of lever 30 cannot urge inertial locking mechanism 95 into unlocked position 180 (
Thus, actuation lock 108 largely prevents unwanted intruders from gaining access to the contents of apparatus 32. Alternative designs may not call for the preventing smaller animals from getting into an apparatus that includes latch system 20. Therefore, alternative embodiments may not include actuation lock 108.
In summary, embodiments entail a latch system for an enclosure, such as a container with a lid, and an apparatus that includes a container and a lid having the latch system incorporated therein. The latch system includes an inertial lock mechanism that includes a swing lever in geared engagement with a sear element. The sear element is typically engaged with a catch member that engages with a latch receptacle fastened to the closure element. When the latch system is subjected to an acceleration event, such as being sharply lifted or briefly shaken, a weight on the end of the swing lever causes the swing lever to pivot in one direction. Therefore, the sear element rotates in the opposing direction due to its geared engagement with the swing lever. This pivoting action moves sear element out of engagement with the catch member, thereby enabling the catch member to swing to a release position so that the lid having the latch receptacle can open. Thus, the latch system automatically unlatches when the container is sharply lifted or briefly shaken so that contents of the container can be accessed. The latch system then automatically re-engages when the container is returned to its upright position. The latch system can further include an actuation lock that prevents manual actuation of the latch system by an unwanted intruder when the apparatus having the latch system is tilted, tipped, or otherwise moved away from an upright position.
Although the preferred embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described in detail, it will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications may be made therein without departing from the spirit of the invention or from the scope of the appended claims. For example, the lock system may be implemented to allow controlled access to a multitude of container designs, cupboards, gates, and the like. Additionally, other designs for the actuation lock may be adapted to react to tipping movement of the container and subsequently prevent release of the locking mechanism so that an intruder cannot gain entry into the apparatus.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1564593 | Lawrence | Dec 1925 | A |
4155584 | Pracchia | May 1979 | A |
4182530 | Hodge | Jan 1980 | A |
4863053 | Oberg | Sep 1989 | A |
4865368 | McCall et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
5007786 | Bingman | Apr 1991 | A |
5213382 | Dawdy et al. | May 1993 | A |
5230393 | Mezey | Jul 1993 | A |
5385258 | Sutherlin | Jan 1995 | A |
5419598 | Kreitzer | May 1995 | A |
5505576 | Sizemore et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5638977 | Bianchi | Jun 1997 | A |
5673810 | Rothrock | Oct 1997 | A |
5776405 | Prout et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5922267 | Brescia et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6327879 | Malsom | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6547289 | Greenheck et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6550824 | Ramsauer | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6550827 | Tsujino | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6612625 | Barber et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6644906 | Bayne | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6666485 | Moret | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6808080 | Spiers et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6880717 | O'Conor | Apr 2005 | B1 |
7038585 | Hall et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7048347 | Liu | May 2006 | B1 |
7086557 | Miller et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7128233 | Hogan | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7128515 | Arrez et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7277009 | Hall et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7559735 | Pruteanu et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7681752 | Moore | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7775564 | Moore | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7871233 | Arrez et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8056943 | Scheffy et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8146769 | Hogan | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8191953 | Simon et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8550282 | Libhart et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
20020030595 | Kasik | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20070175898 | Craft et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070175910 | Hogarth et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20110031765 | Vazquez et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20120006838 | Michael et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Bear Aware British Columbia, “Bear-Resistant Container”, bear-resistant-bins.html, Jun. 24, 2010, pp. 1-3, British Columbia. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140070550 A1 | Mar 2014 | US |