This invention relates generally to the field of window hardware and specifically to a system for operating the latching mechanisms including an anti-bow latch for a tilt-in double hung window assembly.
Typical double hung windows have at least one vertically sliding window sash with pivots at the bottom corners of the window sash and releasable latches near the top corners of the sash that disengage from tracks in the window frame to allow the window to tilt in for ease of cleaning. These releasable latches are most commonly actuated by means of rotating or sliding levers (commonly known as tilt latches) positioned on the top surface of the sash, which operate to retract the locking points from tracks in the window jamb. The most typical embodiment of this latching arrangement involves a separate lever or similar operator designed to engage and disengage each latch, resulting in multiple operating mechanisms protruding from the window sash and the need to actuate multiple operators in order to tilt in the window.
An established shortcoming of the typical tilt-in style double hung window is that sometimes there is a lack of an adequate seal between the window sash and the jamb of the window frame. In order for the double hung window to tilt in freely upon disengagement of the releasable latches, the portion of the window sash between the pivot points at its base and the releasable latches at the upper end cannot be permanently fastened within the window frame. As a result, high perpendicular forces against the window, resulting from strong winds, for example, can result in inward bowing of the window sash and distortion of the sash and frame sealing edges. This problem is even more pronounced with larger windows having larger gaps between pivot and upper latch points, or windows in multi-story office or apartment buildings, which are routinely exposed to high velocity winds at the upper floors.
To overcome this problem, additional locking mechanisms can be added to the sides of the window sash at an intermediate point between the pivot points and the releasable latches. U.S. Pat. No. 4,525,952 to Cunningham et al. discloses a tilt-in window with two levers at the top of the window sash designed to retract two upper latches, and two levers on the sides of the window sash that retract two additional latches, intended to provide additional stability for the window and an improved seal. While this addresses some aspects of the inward bowing concerns, the multiple levers result in a cumbersome process for locking and unlocking the window sash, as well as an aesthetically cluttered window design.
The inconvenience of operating two release levers to retract upper latches to tilt in the window sash has prompted the development of window designs employing a single, centrally located handle or lever designed to retract both tilt latches, through use of such mechanisms as a linked cam or retracting cables. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,992,907 to Sheldon et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,090,750 to Lindqvist, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/041,784 to Marshik. However, the problem of effectively and conveniently retracting both traditional upper latches and intermediate (anti-bow) locking mechanisms has not been addressed. Further, by themselves, the simple mechanical means of retracting these locking latches, as disclosed in the prior art, are not capable of retracting additional locking points that are not horizontally in-line with the lever and upper locking points.
Provided is a latching system for a tilt-in double hung window, having an upper latch member, an anti-bow latch member, and an activating member, which is connected to the upper latch member and the anti-bow latch member for operating both the upper latch member and the anti-bow latch member.
Also provided is a latching system as described above, wherein the upper latch member is disposed in an upper rail of the window sash, and the anti-bow latch is disposed in a side stile of the window sash. Both the upper latch member and anti-bow latch member engage with a slide channel within the window frame. An operating mechanism is provided to connect the activating member with the upper latch member and the anti-bow latch member, so that actuation of the activating member disengages or engages both the upper latch member and the anti-bow latch member from the slide channel.
Further provided is a latching system as described above, wherein the operating mechanism comprises an upper latch operating mechanism for connecting the activating member with the upper latch member, and an anti-bow latch operating mechanism for connecting the activating member with the anti-bow latch member.
Further provided is a latching system as described above, wherein the operating mechanism comprises an upper latch operating mechanism for connecting the activating member with the upper latch member, and an anti-bow latch operating mechanism for connecting the activating member with the anti-bow latch member.
Still further provided is a latching system as described above, wherein a central activating member activates all latches.
The present invention contemplates a mechanism for installation in a double hung window sash having, for example, a single or pair of actuators designed to retract one or both of the upper latches common to a tilting window, and also for retracting one or more additional bow preventing (anti-bow) side latches on the sides of the window sash. Actuation of the actuator simultaneously or sequentially retracts a multiplicity of latches (such as an upper latch and an anti bow latch, for example, or two pairs of the latches simultaneously—thus four latches—as another example), providing easier tilting when opening, and prevention of bowing in the window's closed and locked position.
More specifically, one embodiment of the invention includes an activating member located on the upper rail of the window sash connected to two upper latches to retract the latches when the activating member is operated, disengaging the latches from the slide channel within the window frame. These connections may comprise one of several designs—some disclosed herein—constructed to retract two latches using one operator, such as a linked cam assembly, a cam and a spring loaded piston-rod assembly, or a retracting cable configuration, as examples. Alternatively, another embodiment of the invention includes the use of a pair of activating members each of which actuate only one upper latch member a side of the window and also actuate any anti-bow latch members on that same side. The side activating members could be designed to be consistent with the more traditional tilt latches known in the field, such as the sliding tilt latch described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,553,353 to Simpson and U.S. Pat. No. 5,970,656 to Meier, or a pivoting lever-type tilt latch described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,961,286 to Bezubic and U.S. Pat. No. 5,301,989 to Dallmann et al., all incorporated herein by reference.
In either above approach, the activating member is connected to one or more side anti-bow latches, located vertically between the window's pivot points and the upper latches within the window sash stile, in order to engage or disengage the anti-bow latches from the window frame slide channels when the activating member is operated. These connections may be designed and arranged so as to be connected with the upper latch connection mechanisms, or they may be independent of the upper latch operation. These connections may comprise one of several designs that will translate a movement of the activating member or the upper latch connection mechanisms to a vertically displaced movement, a lateral movement, a rotational movement, or some other movement sufficient to retract the anti-bow latches. Examples of such an operating connection include a cable and pulley system, a vertically extended gear linkage, a flexible retractable tape-like member in an L-shaped slot, or a vertical linkage with retracting roller assembly.
Referring to
The window frame includes vertical jambs 7 defining opposed vertical slide channels 8. Brake assemblies 9a are slidable in respective slide channels 8. Lower corners of the lower sash 4 are provided with pivot assemblies 9b that are associated with respective brake assemblies 9a to define pivot and brake assemblies. The brake assemblies 9a can be supported by respective counterbalances, such as balance springs disposed in the slide channels 8, for example. Upper latch members 40 are disposed in the upper corners of the sash, and anti-bow latch members 60 are disposed in the vertical stiles 5 of the sash 4, positioned between the pivot assemblies 9b and the upper latch members 40. The upper latch members 40 and anti-bow latch members 60 engage within the slide channels 8 in the window's locked position, as shown in
Referring to
A central activating member including, for example, an actuator 10 and a pivoting component 20, is also shown in
Centrally positioned on the upper surface of the sash rail 6 is the actuator 10, such as a handle, switch, or lever, for example, which is connected to the pivoting component 20 through an opening in the upper sash rail 6, thus making up the activating member. The upper linkage assembly shown in the figure is constructed such that operation of the actuator 10 rotates the pivoting component 20, causing the horizontal linking members 30 to retract the upper latches 40 into the upper sash rail 6, thereby disengaging the upper latches 40 from the slide channels, although other implementations of the activating member are contemplated (some of which are discussed hereinbelow).
The vertical linking members 32 are for connecting the horizontal linking members 30 and/or the upper latch 40 to one or more corresponding anti-bow latching members 60, for activating the anti-bow latching members. Thus, a single operation of the activating member via the actuator 10 will activate both the upper latches and the anti-bow latches, preferably simultaneously.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Additional solutions for retracting the upper latches may include a rack and gear assembly in which latches are extended or retracted by horizontal rack components that are laterally adjusted by a central rotating gear attached to the lever. Other known means of retracting the upper latches can also be utilized. The possible embodiments of this upper linkage assembly, used to retract and extend the upper latches, are not limited to those depicted in the referenced drawings.
The addition of vertical linking members (for examples, see
Referring to
Consequently, for the above alternative embodiment, a pair of activating members would be necessary, one on each side of the window, in order to retract all of the upper and anti-bow latches, and thus tilt the window. For many situations, this is less desirable than a single, central operator that can operate all of the latches simultaneously, but the dual activating member solution might be chosen for situations where the use of a central operator is not desired, or is not possible (such as where there is a central lock device, for example, for locking the window shut).
Now referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Additional means for retracting the side anti-bow latches may include vertical linkage mechanisms connected to the horizontal linkage mechanisms and to the end of a pivoting side anti-bow latch member, where retraction of the horizontal linkage mechanism will cause the vertical linkage to pull the end of the pivoting anti-bow latch member, causing it to engage or disengage with the slide channel. Additionally, the mechanism for retracting the anti-bow latch members may operate independently from the mechanism for operating the upper latch members, utilizing such means as a separate cable and pulley system or a separate rack and extended shaft gear assembly. The invention also contemplates a system in which the activating member is connected to, and capable of actuating, a plurality of anti-bow latch members disposed along the length of the sash stile.
The possible embodiments of the latch operating mechanisms are not limited to those depicted in the referenced drawings or as described above, but include other possible implementations known and unknown in the art.
The invention has been described hereinabove using specific examples and embodiments; however, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various alternatives may be used and equivalents may be substituted for elements or steps described herein, without deviating from the scope of the invention. Modifications may be necessary to adapt the invention to a particular situation or to particular needs without departing from the scope of the invention. It is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular implementation described herein, but that the claims be given their broadest interpretation to cover all embodiments, literal or equivalent, covered thereby.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
655382 | Talbot | Aug 1900 | A |
660438 | Holly | Oct 1900 | A |
928005 | Roberts | Jul 1909 | A |
2500849 | Menns | Mar 1950 | A |
3529381 | Grossman | Sep 1970 | A |
4095892 | Thornton | Jun 1978 | A |
4226050 | Kessler | Oct 1980 | A |
4253688 | Hosooka | Mar 1981 | A |
4525952 | Cunningham et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4553353 | Simpson | Nov 1985 | A |
4624073 | Randall | Nov 1986 | A |
4961286 | Bezubic | Oct 1990 | A |
4991886 | Nolte et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5083398 | Kolbeck et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5087087 | Vetter et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5090750 | Lindqvist | Feb 1992 | A |
5118145 | Tucker | Jun 1992 | A |
5127685 | Dallaire et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5152103 | Tucker et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5244238 | Lindqvist | Sep 1993 | A |
5301989 | Dallmann et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5398447 | Morse | Mar 1995 | A |
5414962 | Forbis et al. | May 1995 | A |
5448857 | Stormo | Sep 1995 | A |
D371502 | Morris | Jul 1996 | S |
5531045 | Piltingsrud | Jul 1996 | A |
5560149 | Lafevre | Oct 1996 | A |
RE35463 | Vetter et al. | Feb 1997 | E |
5620213 | Ellis | Apr 1997 | A |
5715631 | Kailian et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5741031 | Bauman et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5791700 | Biro | Aug 1998 | A |
5813710 | Anderson | Sep 1998 | A |
5832666 | Flack, II et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5901499 | Delaske et al. | May 1999 | A |
5927767 | Smith et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5934031 | deNormand | Aug 1999 | A |
5970656 | Maier | Oct 1999 | A |
5992907 | Sheldon et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5996283 | Maier | Dec 1999 | A |
6109668 | Demarco | Aug 2000 | A |
6135511 | Smith et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6230457 | Brautigam | May 2001 | B1 |
6279266 | Searcy | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6305126 | Hendrickson et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6363659 | Wang | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6679001 | Guelck | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6817142 | Marshik | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6877784 | Kelley et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
20020092241 | Uken et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020116874 | Marshik | Aug 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050072075 A1 | Apr 2005 | US |