The subject of the present invention is a color cathode-ray tube having an internal magnetic screen, and more particularly a cathode-ray tube whose color selection mask is held under tension by a support frame.
A color cathode-ray tube is composed of a glass envelope comprising an approximately rectangular front face joined to a funnel-shaped part terminating in a cylindrical neck. An electron gun is placed in the neck and generates electron beams intended to form a color image on a luminescent screen placed on the internal surface of the front panel. The electron beams are kept in correspondence with the phosphors of the luminescent screen by means of a perforated metal mask called the color selection mask. The mask is attached to an approximately rectangular rigid frame with two pairs of opposed sides—a pair of short sides and a pair of long sides. An internal magnetic screen is generally placed in the funnel-shaped part of the envelope and is joined to the rear of the frame. The primary objective of this magnetic screen is to reduce the influence of the components of the Earth's magnetic field on the trajectories of the electron beams so that the angles of incidence of the said beams on the selection mask are not significantly modified by these components; if this were not so, the points of impact of the beams on the screen would be moved and illuminate phosphors of a color other than that desired.
The magnetic screens of the prior art are designed to have a shape matching as closely as possible the internal surface of the funnel-shaped part of the envelope, with openings. The shape and number of openings are specifically designed, for particular types of tubes, to counteract the Earth's field prevent the beams from illuminating the incorrect phosphor.
However, it was apparent that tubes incorporating a mask held under tension between two opposed sides of a frame had a greater sensitivity to the Earth's magnetic field and that the magnetic screens of the prior art could not provide a solution to this sensitivity problem.
This sensitivity seems to be problematic in tubes whose mask is held under tension between two opposed sides of the frame and whose other two sides have a free edge extending towards the screen, the end of which is placed beneath the surface of the mask. This frame structure is generally used because this structure makes it possible, among other things, to lighten the frame/mask assembly and to reduce its material cost, since it is not necessary for the heights of the long and short sides to be identical in order for the frame to fulfil its mechanical functions.
The tube according to the invention does not have this sensitivity to the Earth's magnetic field and to achieve this it comprises a glass envelope having a front face inside which is a luminescent screen, the said front face being sealed to a funnel-shaped part, a color selection mask placed so as to face the luminescent screen and held under tension by an approximately rectangular frame having a pair of long sides and a pair of short sides, the mask being fixed under tension to a first pair of opposed sides, the edges of the sides of the frame which constitute the second pair extending towards the screen and lying beneath the surface of the mask, and a main magnetic screen fixed to the frame and extending to the rear of the funnel-shaped part of the tube's envelope,wherein the tube includes complementary means for making a screen against the Earth's magnetic field, these means being placed so as to cover, at least partially, the open space between the edges of the second pair of sides and the surface of the mask.
The invention and its advantages will be more clearly understood from the description below and from the drawings among which:
Because electrons are charged particles, the electron beams output by the gun 17 are liable to be deflected by the Earth's magnetic field. As a result, depending on the orientation of the tube 10 with respect to the Earth's magnetic field, the electron beams may illuminate phosphors of an array not corresponding to them, causing discoloration of the image formed on the screen of the tube. These tubes therefore have problems called register problems. The effects of the Earth's magnetic field are conventionally minimized by a magnetic screen 22 placed inside the tube along the path of the electron beams, that is to say in the funnel-shaped part 11. This magnetic screen 22, as illustrated for example in
The color selection electrode 16, the frame 21 and the magnetic screen 22, all manufactured from ferromagnetic alloys, have hitherto provided protection against the Earth's magnetic field. However, it seems that the latest generations of tubes 10 with a flat front face 12, in which the color selection electrode 16 is tensioned along a direction, for example along the vertical direction Y, are very sensitive to the Earth's magnetic field.
The frame/mask structure of these tubes is illustrated in FIG. 3.
The frame 21, of approximately rectangular shape, comprises a pair of vertical short sides 40 and a pair of horizontal long sides 30. The sides of the frame 21 have an L-shaped cross section and the color selection mask 16 is held under tension by welding or soldering its horizontal edges to first edges 31 of the frame 21 on the long sides 30. In order to minimize the weight of the frame 21, the short sides 40 have a smaller height than that of the long sides 30. As such, second edges 41 of the frame 21 on said short sides 40 which lie below the mask 16 leave a gap 45 in the Z direction perpendicular to the surface of the color selection electrode 16 between the second edges 41.
Within the context of the invention, it has been demonstrated that the register problems of the tubes incorporating this type of frame/mask structure were due to high sensitivity to the horizontal component of the magnetic field. It was discovered that this sensitivity arose from the unprotected gap 45 between the color selection electrode 16 and the second edges 41 of the frame 21.
In order to screen against this horizontal component, two ferromagnetic metal plates 50 are placed for example inside the tube 10, each along each vertical short side 40, in the gap 45 so as to cover, preferably completely, the said gap 45. This embodiment is illustrated in
In the alternative embodiment in
The table below illustrates the improvements with regard to the register (deviation measured at specific points on the luminescent screen 15 between the phosphor and the point of impact of the electron beam corresponding to it) which are obtained by the lateral magnetic flanges 51 according to the invention, compared with the same frame/mask structure not having these lateral magnetic flanges 51.
The 3 o'clock measurement point conventionally corresponds to the middle of the vertical peripheral edge of the luminescent screen.
These results are obtained under the following test conditions:
firstly, the tube 10 is subjected to a magnetic field variation in the vertical direction of about 380 milligauss;
secondly, the tube 10 is subjected to horizontal field variations of 500 mG along the main axis Z of the tube 10 and then along the horizontal axis X so as to check the variations in register when the receiver incorporating the tube 10 has its orientation changed.
After each measurement, the tube 10 is degaussed in a manner equivalent to the degaussing undergone by the receiver after each tensioning.
The invention provides an appreciable improvement in the performance of the tube 10 against the Earth's magnetic field, and most of all against the horizontal component, which makes it possible to obtain a suitable register whatever the orientation of the image screen.
The invention may also apply in the same way if the color selection electrode 16 is held under tension between the short sides 40 of the frame 21 and there is another gap between the edges 31 of the long sides 30 and the surface of the color selection electrode 16. In this case, the additional means will have to be placed so as to cover this gap in order to screen against the vertical component of the Earth's magnetic field.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
MI00A2135 | Oct 2000 | IT | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP01/10883 | 9/20/2001 | WO | 00 | 3/24/2003 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO02/29846 | 4/11/2002 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4949008 | Chihara | Aug 1990 | A |
6448702 | Kamada et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6727638 | De Paolis et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
20020030429 | Yang | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020171350 | Kim et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
602620 | Jun 1994 | EP |
6-243794 | Sep 1994 | JP |
7-122200 | May 1995 | JP |
10-247459 | Sep 1998 | JP |
11-329275 | Nov 1999 | JP |
2001-23533 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001-196015 | Jul 2001 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030189397 A1 | Oct 2003 | US |