Lateral spondylolisthesis reduction cage

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10449057
  • Patent Number
    10,449,057
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, October 19, 2017
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 22, 2019
    5 years ago
Abstract
An intervertebral fusion device comprising inferior and superior fusion cage devices that provide an ability to correct spondylolisthesis via in-situ adjustment.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Lateral interbody fusion procedures are currently indicated for patients with ≤grade 1 spondylolisthesis. However, correction from the lateral approach is currently limited to regaining height and lordosis with only a low degree of spondylolisthesis correction, as the straight or lordotic cage is impacted during insertion to expand the disc space. Significant spondylolisthesis reduction is currently accomplished via a posterior approach with supplemental posterior fixation devices, including facet screws, translaminar screws, pedicle screws and rods, as well as intraspinous process devices or plates.


Although current lateral cages are characterized by symmetric superior and inferior geometries, the normal and degenerated discs do not have such similar superior and inferior endplate geometries. The lack of conformity of the cage endplate to the pertinent vertebral body can promote cage malpositioning during insertion, improper load balancing, increased settling and/or subsidence, as well as device movement following implantation.


Some surgeons using lateral cages attach lateral plating to the cage to achieve enhanced cage securement accompanied by some degree of biomechanical stabilization. However, most currently available lateral cages do not provide for plate attachment.


US 2004-0220668 (Eisermann) discloses a method for correcting spondylolisthesis from the lateral approach is provided in which a pair of insertion members are inserted laterally into upper and lower vertebrae, a connecting member is affixed to the insertion members, and a rotating force is applied to the connecting member to encourage the upper and lower vertebrae into a desired position relative to one another. In FIGS. 9-11 of Eisermann, in an alternative embodiment, a slidable prosthetic joint can be used to help with the lateral approach for treating spondylolisthesis. The sliding joint extends generally along the longitudinal axis and includes a first slidable component and a second slidable component. The slidable components cooperate to form the sliding joint which is sized and configured for disposition within an intervertebral space between adjacent vertebral bodies. The sliding joint provides movement between the adjacent vertebral bodies to maintain or restore some of the motion similar to the normal bio-mechanical motion provided by a natural intervertebral disc. More specifically, the slidable components are permitted to translate relative to one another in the axial plane.


US Patent Publication No. 2010-0016968 (Moore) discloses an apparatus and method that allow for the realignment and stabilization of adjacent vertebrae. An implant of this invention both repositions adjacent vertebrae and remains in situ to maintain the new position.


The implant has two halves which are interlocked such that they can slide horizontally with respect to each other. Movement of the implant halves and their respective positions are controlled by external set screw and internal locking block within the implant. The implant includes radial anchors which fit into alignment slots made in the misaligned vertebra by the disclosed method. The set screws are used to advance the halves of the implant which in turn move the misaligned vertebrae back into correct positions. The correct position of the vertebrae is locked in place through a bolt and a plate.


U.S. Pat. No. 6,342,074 (Simpson) discloses a spinal fusion implant and method for maintaining proper lumbar spine curvature and intervertebral disc spacing where a degenerative disc has been removed. The one-piece implant comprises a hollow body having an access passage for insertion of bone graft material into the intervertebral space after the implant has been affixed to adjacent vertebrae. The implant provides a pair of screw-receiving passages that are oppositely inclined relative to a central plane. In one embodiment, the screw-receiving passages enable the head of an orthopedic screw to be retained entirely within the access passage. A spinal fusion implant embodied in the present invention may be inserted anteriorally or laterally. FIG. 4 discloses a device having fixtures for attaching to a lateral side of a vertebral body.


U.S. Pat. No. 6,878,167 (Ferree) discloses an osteotomy of a portion of a vertebral endplate and/or vertebral body allowing for easier insertion of a device that fits tightly into a disc space. It also discloses a mechanical device to hold the osteotomized portion of the vertebra against the vertebral body after the intradiscal device is placed. The device may be removed after the pieces of vertebra heal and fuse together. It further discloses a device secured to a side of the vertebral body in FIG. 4C.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to an intervertebral fusion device comprising inferior and superior fusion cages that provide an ability to correct spondylolisthesis via lateral insertion and in-situ adjustment.


Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, there is provided an intervertebral fusion device for correcting spondylolisthesis in a patient, comprising:

    • a) an upper cage having an anterior wall, a posterior wall, and a proximal wall and a distal wall connecting the anterior and posterior walls, and an upper surface for contacting an upper vertebral body and a lower surface,
    • b) a lower cage having an anterior wall, a posterior wall, and a proximal wall and a distal wall connecting the anterior and posterior walls, and a lower surface for contacting a lower vertebral body and an upper surface,


      wherein the lower surface of the upper cage slidingly mates with upper surface of the lower cage.


Also in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a method for correcting spondylolisthesis in a patient, comprising the steps of:

    • a) selecting a fusion device comprising an upper cage and a lower cage,
    • b) fixing the upper cage to an upper vertebral body of the patient and the lower cage to a lower vertebral body of the patient, and
    • c) moving the upper cage relative to the lower cage to correct the spondylolisthesis.


Also in accordance with the present invention, there is provided an intervertebral fusion device for correcting spondylolisthesis in a patient, comprising:

    • a) an upper cage having an anterior wall, a posterior wall, and a proximal wall and a distal wall connecting the anterior and posterior walls, and an upper surface for contacting an upper vertebral body and a lower surface having a first groove therein,
    • b) a lower cage having an anterior wall, a posterior wall, and a proximal wall and a distal wall connecting the anterior and posterior walls, and a lower surface for contacting a lower vertebral body and an upper surface having a second groove therein, and
    • c) a locking plate,


      wherein the lower surface of the upper cage contacts the upper surface of the lower cage so that the first and second grooves form a first throughhole running from the proximal wall to about the distal wall.


      wherein the locking plate is disposed in the first throughole.


Also in accordance with the present invention, there is provided an intervertebral fusion device for correcting spondylolisthesis in a patient, comprising:

    • a) an upper cage having an anterior wall, a posterior wall, and a proximal wall and a distal wall connecting the anterior and posterior walls, and an upper surface for contacting an upper vertebral body and a lower surface,
    • b) a lower cage having an anterior wall, a posterior wall, and a proximal wall and a distal wall connecting the anterior and posterior walls, and a lower surface for contacting a lower vertebral body and an upper surface,


      wherein the anterior wall is connected to the proximal wall by a first dual linkage and to the distal wall by a second dual linkage,


      wherein the posterior wall is connected to the proximal wall by a third dual linkage and to the distal wall by a fourth dual linkage.


      wherein the linkages allow the upper plate to pivot relative to the lower plate in the plane of the proximal wall.


Also in accordance with the present invention, there is provided an intervertebral fusion device for correcting spondylolisthesis in a patient, comprising:

    • a) an upper wall having an upper surface adapted for contacting an upper vertebral body and an inner surface,
    • b) a lower wall having a lower surface adapted for contacting a lower vertebral body and an inner surface,
    • c) proximal and distal walls extending between the upper and lower walls,
    • d) anterior and posterior walls extending between the upper and lower walls,
    • e) a rack-and-pinion mechanism located between the inner surfaces of the upper and lower walls


      wherein the pinion extends substantially from the distal wall to the proximal wall,


      wherein the rack extends substantially from the anterior wall to the posterior wall,


so that rotation of the pinion effects relative movement of the upper and lower walls in the anterior-posterior direction.





DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a side view of a functional spinal unit having grade 1 spondylolisthesis characterized by a 20-25% slip.



FIGS. 2a-2b and 3 disclose the implantation of the fusion device of the present invention, in which the cages of the device are implanted into the disc space, brought together, and then locked in place.



FIGS. 4a-4d show various views of the intervertebral fusion device of the present invention.



FIGS. 4e-4f show various views of the cages of an intervertebral fusion device of the present invention locked with a locking plate.



FIGS. 5a-b disclose a compression-directed inserter of the present invention having distal pins, and the insertion of a cage of the present invention with this inserter.



FIGS. 5c-d disclose a compression-directed inserter of the present invention having distal blades, and the insertion of a cage of the present invention with this inserter.



FIGS. 6a-7b disclose how a compression-directed inserter of the present invention having nested blades aligns the cages of the present invention when activated.



FIGS. 8a-8d disclose how the cages of one embodiment of the present invention are aligned by a rotary spreader, and are locked by a particular locking plate.



FIGS. 9a-9g disclose various views of a dual linkage embodiment of the present invention.



FIGS. 10a-d disclose full and partial views of a rack-and-pinion embodiment of the present invention, some of which are inserted into a disc space.



FIGS. 11a-11e disclose various views of the rack-and-pinion embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 12 discloses a lateral cage of the present invention with oblique screwholes.



FIG. 13 discloses an inserter of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION


FIG. 1 is a side view of a functional spinal unit having grade 1 spondylolisthesis characterized by a 20-25% slip.


In use, the devices of the present invention accomplish improved and controlled spondylolisthesis correction with fusion from the lateral approach. The lateral cage devices of the present invention also provide for intra-operative trialing and selection to enhance conformance of the cage geometry to the vertebral body endplates bounding the targeted disc space. The fusion device of the present invention provides for direct attachment of its superior and inferior cages to the lateral aspects of the opposing vertebral bodies.


Several devices and methods for correcting spondylolisthesis with fusion from the lateral approach are disclosed. All incorporate a superior and inferior fusion cages that are fixedly attached to the corresponding vertebral bodies. The fixed attachment can be accomplished by using pre-attached plates, or by incorporating internal screws (e.g., the STALIF approach) and/or lateral keels. Following implantation, the superior and inferior cages are aligned in-situ via various activation means that are further discussed below, and then locked in place.


The interior, contacting surfaces of the cages that effect intra-device attachment contain alignment and securement features that allow for controlled intra-operative manipulation of the spine in the sagittal plane following individual fixed attachment of the cages to the superior and inferior vertebral bodies. These features can include but are not limited to teeth, barbs, and dovetails.


Both the superior and inferior cages can include features on their outer surfaces that can enhance securement to the vertebral body endplate. These features include fins, barbs, teeth, osteoconductive surface morphology (porosity) and coatings (such as HA and TCP). The superior and inferior cages can also include graft-retention windows and pockets to facilitate the long-term fusion of the two vertebral bodies of the functional spinal unit.


The inner contacting surfaces of the cage can be flat to allow for the incremental lineal adjustment of the relative cage positions. Alternatively, these surfaces can be domed so as to enable the accurate adjustment of the vertebral bodies to a centered position in the flexion/extension plane (i.e., to the center of rotation).


The external geometry of the superior and inferior cages can be flat or lordotic, and can be domed or angled in various plans to enhance their conformance to the vertebral body endplates and to address spinal deformity and/or scoliosis.


Following fixed attachment to the vertebral body, the superior and inferior cages may be aligned by several means, including the following:



FIGS. 2a-2b and 3 disclose the implantation of a first embodiment of a fusion device of the present invention, in which the cages 501,502 of the device are implanted into the disc space, brought together, and then locked in place with a locking plate 503. FIGS. 4a-4d show various views of the intervertebral fusion device of the present invention. FIGS. 4e-4f show various views of the cages of an intervertebral fusion device of the present invention locked with a locking plate.



FIG. 2a and FIG. 2b respectively show the relative positions of the fixed cage before and after alignment. In the FIG. 2b position, the cages have properly aligned the vertebral bodies, and thereby corrected the spondylolisthesis. The superior and inferior cages can also have features that provide or enhance the connection of the cages to the compressor. These features include recesses, pilot holes and threads located on the proximal walls of the two cages (and optionally extending therethrough) that receive mating features located on the cage inserter. These features may also assist in the alignment of the cages. Lastly, the upper portion of the proximal wall of the upper cage and the lower portion of the proximal wall of the lower cage each extend past the anterior and posterior walls of the respective cages, and each has a transverse throughhole. Fixation screws may extend through these holes and into the lateral walls of the corresponding vertebral bodies to provide the immediate fixation of the cages to these vertebral bodies. Such screw locking features are well known in the art.


As shown in FIGS. 4a,4b and 4d, the superior and inferior cages together preferably form a dovetail joint (or other joint having an expanding recess) that allows linear anterior-posterior relative movement of the fixed cages to effect the desired alignment of the vertebral bodies. The contacting surfaces of the superior and inferior cages may also have matching ratchet teeth, as in FIG. 4d, that provide incremental adjustment of the relative cage positions, and the short term inter-cage securement following the compression.


As shown in FIGS. 4e and f, once the superior and inferior cages are aligned together, this desired position may be fixed by attaching a single locking plate to the proximal ends of each cage. This locking plate may be attached to the cages by passing screws through the holes in the plate and into the corresponding holes in the lower portion of the proximal wall of the upper plate and the upper portion of the proximal wall of the lower plate.


Now referring to FIGS. 4a-4f, there is provided (claim 1) an intervertebral fusion device for correcting spondylolisthesis in a patient, comprising:

    • a) an upper cage 1 having an anterior wall 3, a posterior wall 5, and a proximal wall 7 and a distal wall 9 connecting the anterior and posterior walls, and an upper surface 11 for contacting an upper vertebral body and a lower surface 13,
    • b) a lower cage 15 having an anterior wall 17, a posterior wall 19, and a proximal wall 21 and a distal wall 23 connecting the anterior and posterior walls, and a lower surface 25 for contacting a lower vertebral body and an upper surface 27,


      wherein the lower surface of the upper cage slidingly mates with upper surface of the lower cage.


In some embodiments, the lower surface of the upper plate and the upper surface of the lower cage include tongue-and-groove feature. Preferably, the tongue-and-groove feature runs from about the anterior wall to about the posterior wall. Preferably, the tongue-and-groove feature comprises an expanding recess 29 and more preferably comprises a dovetail 31.


In some embodiments, the lower surface of the upper cage and the upper surface of the lower cage include a ridge and recess feature 33 that runs in a proximal-distal direction.


In some embodiments, the proximal wall of the upper cage has a height Hu-p, the anterior wall of the upper cage has a height Hu-a, and wherein the height of the proximal wall of the upper cage is greater than the height of the anterior wall of the upper cage.


In some embodiments, the proximal wall of the upper cage has an upper portion 35 having a upper through-hole 37 located above the anterior wall and adapted for receiving a bone screw.


In some embodiments, the proximal wall of the lower cage has a height Hl-p, the anterior wall of the lower cage has a height Hl-a, and wherein the height of the proximal wall of the lower cage is greater than the height of the anterior wall of the lower cage.


In some embodiments, the proximal wall of the lower cage has a lower portion 39 having a lower through-hole 41 located beneath the anterior wall and adapted for receiving a bone screw.


In some locking plate embodiments, the proximal wall of the upper cage has a lower portion 43 having an lower through-hole 45 located beneath the anterior wall of the upper cage and adapted for receiving a screw. Likewise, the proximal wall of the lower cage has an upper portion 47 having an upper through-hole 49 located above the anterior wall of the lower cage and adapted for receiving a bone fastener such as a screw. The device further comprises:


c) a locking plate 51 having a first and second throughholes 53, and


d) first and second bone fasteners (such as screws) 55,


wherein the locking plate is fixed to the proximal wall of the upper and lower cages by passing the first bone fastener through the first throughhole of the locking plate and into the lower throughhole of the upper cage, and by passing the second bone fastener through the second throughhole of the locking plate and into the upper throughhole of the lower cage.


In some embodiments that promote fusion, the upper cage further comprises a lower surface 13 and a throughole 59 running from the upper surface to the lower surface. In some embodiments that promote fusion, the lower cage further comprises an upper surface and a throughole running from the upper surface to the lower surface. Likewise, the anterior wall further comprises a throughole 61 running therethrough. These throughholes are of a size adapted to promote fusion


In some embodiments, the distal end wall of each of the upper and lower cages has a taper 63 for ease of insertion.


In the first embodiment, and now referring to FIGS. 5a-7b, the alignment means is compression-activated. This preferred embodiment uses a compression instrument to bring the anterior and posterior walls of the inferior and superior cages into alignment, and thereby correct spondylolisthesis.



FIGS. 5a-b disclose a compression-directed inserter 65 of the present invention having distal pins 67, and the insertion of a cage of the present invention with this inserter. FIGS. 5c-d disclose a compression-directed inserter 69 of the present invention having distal blades 71, and the insertion of a cage of the present invention with this inserter. FIGS. 6a-7b disclose how a compression-directed inserter of the present invention having nested blades 72,73 aligns the cages of the present invention when activated.


Now referring to FIG. 5a-d, the compressor instrument may have distal extensions such as blades 71 (FIG. 5c) or pins 67 (FIG. 5a) that act to align the anterior and posterior walls of the cages via compression. The blades of FIG. 5c simply push the anterior and posterior walls of the cages towards each other, thereby removing any overlap and bringing the anterior and posterior walls of these cages into vertical alignment. FIGS. 6a-7b disclose the nesting details of the distal portions of the pinned compressor instrument that allow the instrument's distal pins (not shown) to become aligned.


Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, there is provided (claim 16) a method for correcting spondylolisthesis in a patient, comprising the steps of:

    • a) selecting a fusion device comprising an upper cage and a lower cage,
    • b) fixing the upper cage to an upper vertebral body of the patient and the lower cage to a lower vertebral body of the patient,
    • c) moving the upper cage relative to the lower cage to correct the spondylolisthesis.


      Preferably, the method further comprises the step of: d) locking the upper cage to the lower cage.


      In some embodiments, the locking step is accomplished by a locking plate. In some embodiments, the moving step is accomplished with a compression-directed inserter.


In some embodiments, the moving step is accomplished with a rotary spreader.


In a second embodiment, and now referring to FIG. 8a-8d, the alignment means is rotary spreader-activated. FIGS. 8a-8d disclose how the cages of one embodiment of the present invention are aligned by a rotary spreader, and are locked by a particular locking plate. A modified spreader or shaver can be inserted into a space formed in the proximal end wall of the unaligned device. Rotating the spreader causes relative anterior-posterior movement of the upper cage vis-a-vis the lower cage to enable alignment of the cages and thereby intraoperative adjustment of a spondylosed functional spinal unit (FSU).


Now referring to FIG. 8b, optional locking plates can be employed to fix the device after the spondylolisthesis has been corrected. These plates are preferably inserted into bilateral, aligned, longitudinal recesses that extend across the interface of the aligned cages to provide inter-cage locking. In some embodiments, these plates are locked into place via a snap-lock mechanism, as shown in FIG. 8d.


In some embodiments, and now referring to FIG. 8a, the upper surface of the lower cage and the lower surface of the upper cage may be configured in matching domes in order to mimic the natural relative arced movement of adjacent vertebral bodies.


Now referring to FIGS. 8a-8d, there is provided (claim 21) an intervertebral fusion device for correcting spondylolisthesis in a patient, comprising:

    • a) an upper cage 75 having an anterior wall 77, a posterior wall 79, and a proximal wall 81 and a distal wall 83 connecting the anterior and posterior walls, and an upper surface 85 for contacting an upper vertebral body and a lower surface 87 having a first groove 89 therein,
    • b) a lower cage 91 having an anterior wall 93, a posterior wall 95, and a proximal wall 97 and a distal wall 99 connecting the anterior and posterior walls, and a lower surface 101 for contacting a lower vertebral body and an upper surface 103 having a second groove 104 therein, and
    • c) a pair of locking plates 105,


      wherein the lower surface of the upper cage contacts the upper surface of the lower cage so that the first and second grooves form a first throughhole 107 running from the proximal wall to about the distal wall,


      wherein the locking plate is disposed in the first throughole.


In some embodiments, the first groove is present upon the lower surface of the anterior wall of the upper cage, and the second groove is present upon the upper surface of the anterior wall of the lower cage. In other embodiments, the first groove is present upon the lower surface of the posterior wall of the upper cage, and the second groove is present upon the upper surface of the posterior wall of the lower cage.


In some embodiments, the device of the second embodiment further comprises a third groove 109 present upon the lower surface of the upper cage between the anterior and posterior walls, and a fourth groove 111 present upon the upper surface of the lower cage between the anterior and posterior walls, and wherein the lower surface of the upper cage contacts the upper surface of the lower plate so that the third and fourth grooves form a second throughhole 113 running from the proximal wall to about the distal wall, the second throughhole adapted for insertion of a spreader therein.


In a third embodiment, and now referring to FIGS. 9a-9g, the attachment means is linkage activated. FIGS. 9a-9g disclose various views of a dual linkage embodiment of the present invention Single- or double-linkage can be used to correct spondylolisthesis by moving this cage from a pre-activated (FIG. 9a) to a post-activated state. (FIG. 9b) In some linkage embodiments, the anterior and posterior walls of the cages also function as linkage bars, providing for pivoting connection with both an upper wall component and a lower wall component to allow for relative anterior-posterior movement of the upper wall vis-à-vis the lower wall and thereby spondylolisthesis correction.


In some embodiments, and now referring to FIGS. 9c-9d, the upper portion of the upper wall and the lower portion of the lower wall extend outwardly, and transverse holes in these portions provide a means to fix the upper and lower walls to the respective lateral walls of the vertebral bodies.


In some embodiments, and now referring to FIG. 9d, the upper wall and the lower wall have transverse throughholes that extend into a chamber formed in the interior of the device. These throughholes and this chamber facilitate the fusion of the opposing vertebral bodies through the device. Also referring to FIG. 9d, the anterior and posterior walls may likewise have transverse throughholes that extend into a chamber formed in the interior of the device, and thereby facilitate the fusion of the opposing vertebral bodies through the device.


Now referring to FIG. 9e-9g, optional locking plates can be employed to fix the device following spondylolisthesis correction. These plates are preferably inserted into bilateral, aligned, longitudinal recesses that extend from the upper wall to the lower wall to provide inter-cage locking. In some embodiments, these plates are locked into place via a snap-lock mechanism, as shown in FIG. 9e.


Now referring to FIGS. 9a-9g, there is provided (claim 31) an intervertebral fusion device for correcting spondylolisthesis in a patient, comprising:

    • a) an upper cage 115 having an anterior wall 117, a posterior wall 119, and a proximal wall 121 and a distal wall 123 connecting the anterior and posterior walls, and an upper surface 125 for contacting an upper vertebral body and a lower surface 127,
    • b) a lower cage 131 having an anterior wall 133, a posterior wall 135, and a proximal wall 137 and a distal wall 139 connecting the anterior and posterior walls, and a lower surface 141 for contacting a lower vertebral body and an upper surface 143,


      wherein the anterior wall is connected to the proximal wall by a first dual linkage 145 and to the distal wall by a second dual linkage (not shown),


      wherein the posterior wall is connected to the proximal wall by a third dual linkage 149 and to the distal wall by a fourth dual linkage (not shown),


      wherein the linkages allow the upper plate to pivot relative to the lower plate in the plane of the proximal wall.


In some aspects of this third embodiment, the proximal wall of the upper cage has a height, the anterior wall of the upper cage has a height, and wherein the height of the proximal wall of the upper cage is greater than the height of the anterior wall of the upper cage. In some embodiments thereof, the proximal wall of the upper cage has an upper portion 153 having a upper through-hole 155 located above the anterior wall and adapted for receiving a bone screw.


In other aspects of this third embodiment, the proximal wall of the lower cage has a height, the anterior wall of the lower cage has a height, and wherein the height of the proximal wall of the lower cage is greater than the height of the anterior wall of the lower cage. In some embodiments thereof, the proximal wall of the lower cage has a lower portion 157 having a lower through-hole 159 located beneath the anterior wall and adapted for receiving a bone screw.


In some embodiments, the upper cage has a throughole 161 running from the upper surface to the lower surface. This throughhole is adapted for promoting fusion


In a fourth embodiment, the alignment means includes a rack-and-pinion. A pinion located between the upper and lower walls and extending laterally can be rotated to move racks extending in the anterior-posterior direction and thereby reduce spondylolisthesis. FIGS. 10a-d disclose full and partial views of a rack-and-pinion embodiment of the present invention, some of which are inserted into a disc space. FIGS. 11a-11e disclose various views of the rack-and-pinion embodiment of the present invention.


Now referring to FIGS. 10a-11e, there is provided (claim 41) an intervertebral fusion device for correcting spondylolisthesis in a patient, comprising:

    • a) an upper wall 171 having an upper surface 173 adapted for contacting an upper vertebral body and an inner surface 175,
    • b) a lower wall 177 having a lower surface 179 adapted for contacting a lower vertebral body and an inner surface 181,
    • c) proximal 183 and distal 185 walls extending between the upper and lower walls,
    • d) anterior 187 and posterior 189 walls extending between the upper and lower walls,
    • e) a rack-and-pinion mechanism located between the inner surfaces of the upper and lower walls


      wherein the pinion 191 extends substantially from the distal wall to the proximal wall,


      wherein the rack 193 extends substantially from the anterior wall to the posterior wall, so that rotation of the pinion effects relative movement of the upper and lower walls in the anterior-posterior direction.


In some aspects of the fourth embodiment, the length of the device is at least three times the height of the device.


In some embodiments, the upper and lower walls each have at least one hole 195 therethrough to facilitate fusion through the device. In others, the anterior and posterior walls each have at least one hole 197 therethrough to facilitate fusion through the device.


In some embodiments, the rack extends from the inner surface of the upper wall. In others, the rack extends from the inner surface of the lower wall.


In some embodiments, the pinion comprises a proximal end 199 having a feature 201 for receiving a rotary tool.


In some embodiments, at least one of the anterior and posterior walls is integral with at least one of the upper and lower walls.


In some embodiments, at least one of the anterior and posterior walls is removable.


The embodiments of the present invention may optionally a securement plate that attaches to both the device of the present invention and the vertebral bodies. This securement plate secures the position of the device and provides supplemental stabilization.


In general, the devices of the present invention are suited for substantially lateral insertion into the disc space. In some embodiments, the cages are inserted through a more anterolateral insertion angle.


Now referring to FIGS. 4a and 4c, the length L of the device is characterized as the distance from the distal wall to the proximal wall. The width W of the device is characterized as the distance from the anterior wall to the posterior wall. The height H of the device is characterized as the distance from the lower surface to the upper surface, excludes the upper and lower portions that extend past the anterior wall, and generally corresponds to the height of the disc space. In general, the length of the lateral devices of the present invention are typically at least twice and often three times the width of the device. In general, the length of the lateral devices of the present invention are typically at least twice and often three times the height of the device. Typically, the width of the device is greater than the height of the device.


In some embodiments, as in FIG. 11b, the anterior wall of the cage may have a convex curve 203 to mimic the convex shape of the anterior portion of the disc space


The lateral spondylolisthesis reduction fusion devices of the present invention may be produced from a single material or from multiple materials. These materials include metallics (such as Ti, Ti alloys such as nitinol, stainless steel, and cobalt-chrome), polymeric materials (including PEEK, PEAK, polypropylene, polyethylene terephthalate (PET), UHMWPE), biologic materials (including allograft, hydroxyapatite, TCP and CaPO4), and ceramic materials including silicon nitrides, and zirconia-containing ceramics. The plate, fasteners, or locking mechanisms can be produced from metallics or polymers for enhance durability.


Additionally, modified versions of this concept can be designed to correct spondylolisthesis with superior and inferior cages that are inserted from the anterior, anterior-lateral or posterior approaches.


The cages of the present invention are preferably inserted either from a right lateral or left lateral approach.


Following standard access and disc preparation procedures, the superior and inferior cages are inserted and affixed to the opposed vertebral bodies with screws or bone fasteners. Spondylolisthesis correction is then performed with the disclosed compressor or with a rotary tool. Optionally, locking members are then applied to the superior and inferior cages to fix the orientation of the segments.


Also in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a method of implanting an intervertebral device between opposed vertebral bodies, comprising the steps of:


i) selecting an intervertebral device comprising:

    • a. an upper half component having an anterior wall, a posterior wall, and two side walls connecting the anterior wall and posterior wall;
    • b. a lower half component having an anterior wall, a posterior wall, and two side walls connecting the anterior wall and posterior wall;


ii) inserting the device between opposed vertebral bodies, whereby the anterior walls are not aligned,


iii) moving (preferably by pivoting) one of the components with respect to the other component so that the anterior walls are substantially aligned, and


iv) fixing the device to the opposed vertebral bodies.


In some embodiments of the present invention, the fusion device is angled to provide either lordosis or kyphosis. In embodiments in which lordosis is desired, the height of the anterior wall exceeds the height of the posterior wall. An example of such a lordotic implant is shown in FIG. 4c. In embodiments in which kyphosis is desired, the height of the anterior wall is less than the height of the posterior wall.


It is believed by the present inventors that the devices disclosed herein appear to be the first intervertebral devices having a flange that connects to a side of a vertebral body. Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a method of inserting a fusion device between opposed vertebral bodies, comprising the steps of:

    • a) selecting an intervertebral device having an anterior wall, a posterior wall and a pair of side walls connecting the anterior and posterior walls, wherein at least one of the side walls has a flange axially extending beyond the anterior wall and the posterior wall, wherein the flange has a throughhole,
    • b) inserting the device between the opposed vertebral bodies, and
    • c) inserting a fixation device through the throughhole to fix the device to a side of one of the opposed vertebral bodies.


Although the cages of the present invention are disclosed as having flanges that extend beyond the disc space for attachment to the sides of the opposed vertebral bodies, it is also contemplated that the cages of the present invention may be attached to the opposed vertebral bodies via zero profile throughholes. These zero profile throughholes are provided both a) at the upper edge of the proximal side wall of the upper half component and b) at the lower edge of the proximal side wall of the lower half component.


Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, there is provided an intervertebral fusion device for correcting spondylolisthesis in a patient, comprising:

    • a) an upper cage having an anterior wall, a posterior wall, and a proximal wall and a distal wall connecting the anterior and posterior walls, and a throughole present at the upper edge of the proximal wall for receiving a bone fixation device,
    • b) a lower cage having an anterior wall, a posterior wall, and a proximal wall and a distal wall connecting the anterior and posterior walls, and a lower surface for contacting a lower vertebral body and an upper surface, and a throughole present at the lower edge of the proximal wall for receiving a bone fixation device,


      wherein the lower surface of the upper cage slidingly mates with upper surface of the lower cage.


Although the above description discloses how to make and use implantable devices to correct spondylolisthesis, it is within the scope of the invention to use these devices as instruments to correct retrolisthesis as well. Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a method for correcting spondylolisthesis in a patient, comprising the steps of:

    • a) selecting an instrument comprising an upper cage and a lower cage, wherein each cage is attached to a handle
    • b) attaching the upper cage to an upper vertebral body of the patient and the lower cage to a lower vertebral body of the patient (preferably with caspar pins),
    • c) moving the upper cage relative to the lower cage to correct the spondylolisthesis (preferably with a distractor that engages the caspar pins), and
    • d) removing the instrument from the patient.


Although the above description discloses how to make and use devices in the context of correcting spondylolisthesis, it is within the scope of the invention to use similar devices to correct retrolisthesis as well.



FIG. 12 discloses a lateral cage of the present invention with oblique screwholes 301.



FIG. 13 discloses an inserter 303 of the present invention. FIG. 13 is a top view of a second type of spondylolisthesis reduction tool that comprises a proximal handle portion 305 and two vertebral body engaging beams 307. On the distal end of the beams are bone engaging features 309 for the respective superior and inferior vertebral bodies. At the proximal end of the beams the inferior beam is fixed within the handle and the superior is attached with a pivot so that its distal end can move posterior and anterior with respect to the lower. Conversely, the lower beam could also be affixed in a pivoting fashion so that both beams move as in a scissor fashion. This intended motion corresponds to a posterior transverse plane motion of the superior vertebral body in order to reduce the spondylolisthesis. By slightly rotating the handle or tilting the tool prior to engagement, a saggital plane component is introduced to the reduction motion (it may be beneficial to increase the height of one body over the other as you move that body posteriorly).


The cross section of the beams are sufficiently wide in the anterior-posterior direction making them resistant to bending in the transverse plane. The mechanism within the handle is to pivot the beams. This can be done with a ratchet and pawl linkage which moves the top beam one click with each squeeze, or a sliding collar that advances distally along the beams to bring them in line with each other, or a wedge/roller that advances along the edge of the superior beam or a post and angled slot mechanism that aligns the two beams, or with a geared scissor mechanism such that the full motion of the handle corresponds to a small angular change of the beams. The controlled motion of the beams relative to each other is advantageous as the operating surgeon generally has a pre-determined amount of reduction in mind for the surgery. This amount can be determined via radiograph or inter-operatively. For example if a total of 6 mm of reduction is desired, the handle can be ratcheted 1 mm at a time until the value of 6 mm is reached.


Therefore, there is provided a spondylolisthesis reduction tool comprising:

    • a) a proximal handle portion, and
    • b) first and second vertebral body-engaging beams having a longitudinal axis, a proximal end portion and a distal end portion, the distal end portion of each beam forming bone engaging features,


      wherein the proximal end portion of the first beams is fixedly attached to the handle portion, and


      wherein the proximal end portion of the second beam is pivotally attached to the handle portion so that the second beam can move transversely with respect to the longitudinal axis of the first beam.


      Preferably, the handle portion comprises a trigger 311 adapted to pivotally move the second beam.

Claims
  • 1. An intervertebral fusion method, comprising: inserting an intervertebral fusion device into an intervertebral disc space defined between upper and lower vertebrae via a lateral approach along an insertion direction such that an upper endplate of the device contacts the upper vertebra and a lower endplate of the device contacts the lower vertebra;applying a rotation to a spreader disposed between the upper and lower endplates, a first surface of the spreader bearing against a ramped surface of the upper endplate during said rotation and a second surface of the spreader bearing against a ramped surface of the lower endplate during said rotation, said rotation being effective to move the first and second endplates relative to one another in a direction perpendicular to the insertion direction;inserting an upper bone fastener through an opening of the upper endplate and into a lateral wall of the upper vertebra; andinserting a lower bone fastener through an opening of the lower endplate and into a lateral wall of the lower vertebra.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the ramped surfaces of the upper and lower endplates move apart from one another as the endplates move relative to one another in the direction perpendicular to the insertion direction.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the first and second surfaces of the spreader are formed on opposite sides of the spreader.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the spreader includes a cylindrical portion that extends longitudinally along the device towards a proximal wall of the device.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the rotation is applied to the cylindrical portion of the spreader.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the upper and lower endplates include opposed ramped surfaces configured to contact one another.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the upper endplate has a lower surface and the lower endplate has an upper surface, wherein said lower and upper surfaces are configured to contact one another in a first configuration of the device and to be spaced apart from one another in a second configuration of the device.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein, prior to applying the rotation, the opening of the upper endplate and the opening of the lower endplate are offset from one another in an anterior-posterior direction.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the opening of the upper endplate is formed in an extension that extends upwards from a bone-contacting surface of the upper endplate and wherein the opening of the lower endplate is formed in an extension that extends downwards from a bone-contacting surface of the lower endplate.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the device includes a graft retention window.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, wherein the openings in the upper and lower endplates comprise oblique fastener holes.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, wherein bone-engaging surfaces of the upper and lower endplates comprise teeth.
  • 13. The method of claim 1, wherein the external geometry of the device is lordotic.
  • 14. The method of claim 1, wherein a proximal wall of the device comprises a recess.
  • 15. The method of claim 1, wherein a length defined between proximal and distal ends of the device is a least twice a width defined between anterior and posterior ends of the device.
  • 16. An intervertebral fusion method, comprising: inserting an intervertebral fusion device into an intervertebral disc space defined between upper and lower vertebrae via a lateral approach such that an upper surface of an upper endplate of the device contacts the upper vertebra and a lower surface of a lower endplate of the device contacts the lower vertebra, wherein the upper and lower surfaces define a height direction therebetween, wherein the device includes a core component having an upper endportion engaged with the upper endplate and a lower endportion engaged with the lower endplate;moving the upper and lower endplates relative to one another such that: (i) a distance between the upper and lower surfaces in the height direction increases; and(ii) the upper surface moves relative to the lower endportion of the core component in a first direction, the first direction being perpendicular to the height direction;inserting an upper bone fastener through an opening of the upper endplate and into a lateral wall of the upper vertebra; andinserting a lower bone fastener through an opening of the lower endplate and into a lateral wall of the lower vertebra.
  • 17. The method of claim 16, wherein at least a portion of the core component rotates during said movement of the upper and lower endplates relative to one another.
  • 18. The method of claim 16, wherein the upper endplate has a lower planar surface and the lower endplate has an upper planar surface, wherein said lower and upper surfaces are configured to move apart from one another during said movement of the upper and lower endplates relative to one another.
  • 19. The method of claim 16, wherein, prior to moving the upper and lower endplates relative to one another, the opening of the upper endplate and the opening of the lower endplate are offset from one another in an anterior-posterior direction.
  • 20. The method of claim 16, wherein the opening of the upper endplate is formed in an extension that extends upwards from the upper surface and wherein the opening of the lower endplate is formed in an extension that extends downwards from the lower surface.
  • 21. The method of claim 16, wherein the device includes a graft retention window.
  • 22. The method of claim 16, wherein the openings in the upper and lower endplates comprise oblique fastener holes.
  • 23. The method of claim 16, wherein the upper and lower surfaces comprise teeth.
  • 24. The method of claim 16, wherein the external geometry of the device is lordotic.
  • 25. The method of claim 16, wherein a proximal wall of the device comprises a recess.
  • 26. The method of claim 16, wherein a length defined between proximal and distal ends of the device is a least twice a width defined between anterior and posterior ends of the device.
CONTINUING DATA

This application is a continuation of patent application U.S. Ser. No. 15/415,299, filed Jan. 25, 2017, entitled “Lateral Spondylolisthesis Reduction Cage”, which is a continuation of patent application U.S. Ser. No. 14/919,863, filed Oct. 22, 2015, entitled “Lateral Spondylolisthesis Reduction Cage”, which is a continuation of patent application U.S. Ser. No. 14/496,765, filed Sep. 25, 2014, entitled “Lateral Spondylolisthesis Reduction Cage”, referred to below as “the '765 application,” each of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. The '765 application is a division of patent application U.S. Ser. No. 13/163,427, filed Jun. 17, 2011 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,845,733), entitled “Lateral Spondylolisthesis Reduction Cage” which claims priority to provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 61/466,302 filed Mar. 22, 2011; provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 61/397,716 filed Nov. 30, 2010; provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 61/410,177 filed Nov. 4, 2010; provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 61/385,958, filed Sep. 23, 2010; provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 61/379,194 filed Sep. 1, 2010; and provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 61/358,220 filed Jun. 24, 2010, all of which are incorporated by reference in their entireties. The '765 application is a division of patent application U.S. Ser. No. 13/163,471, filed on Jun. 17, 2011 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,282,979), entitled “Instruments and Methods for Non-Parallel Disc Space Preparation” which claims priority to provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 61/466,302 filed Mar. 22, 2011; provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 61/397,716 filed Nov. 30, 2010; provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 61/410,177 filed Nov. 4, 2010; provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 61/385,958, filed Sep. 23, 2010; provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 61/379,194 filed Sep. 1, 2010; and provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 61/358,220 filed Jun. 24, 2010, all of which are incorporated by reference in their entireties. The '765 application is a division of patent application U.S. Ser. No. 13/163,496, filed on Jun. 17, 2011, entitled “Flexible Vertebral Body Shavers”, which claims priority to provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 61/466,302 filed Mar. 22, 2011; provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 61/397,716 filed Nov. 30, 2010; provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 61/410,177 filed Nov. 4, 2010; provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 61/385,958, filed Sep. 23, 2010; provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 61/379,194 filed Sep. 1, 2010; and provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 61/358,220 filed Jun. 24, 2010, all of which are incorporated by reference in their entireties. The '765 application is a division of patent application U.S. Ser. No. 13/163,517, filed Jun. 17, 2011 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,763,678), entitled “Multi-Segment Lateral Cages adapted to Flex Substantially in the Coronal Plane”, which claims priority to provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 61/466,302 filed Mar. 22, 2011; provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 61/397,716 filed Nov. 30, 2010; provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 61/410,177 filed Nov. 4, 2010; provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 61/385,958, filed Sep. 23, 2010; provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 61/379,194 filed Sep. 1, 2010; and provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 61/358,220 filed Jun. 24, 2010, all of which are incorporated by reference in their entireties. The '765 application is a division of patent application U.S. Ser. No. 13/163,397, filed Jun. 17, 2011 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,592,063), entitled “Universal Trial for Lateral Cages”, which claims priority to provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 61/466,302 filed Mar. 22, 2011; provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 61/397,716 filed Nov. 30, 2010; provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 61/410,177 filed Nov. 4, 2010; provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 61/385,958, filed Sep. 23, 2010; provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 61/379,194 filed Sep. 1, 2010; and provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 61/358,220 filed Jun. 24, 2010, all of which are incorporated by reference in their entireties.

US Referenced Citations (348)
Number Name Date Kind
4105034 Shalaby et al. Aug 1978 A
4130639 Shalaby et al. Dec 1978 A
4140678 Shalaby et al. Feb 1979 A
4141087 Shalaby et al. Feb 1979 A
4205399 Shalaby et al. Jun 1980 A
4208511 Shalaby et al. Jun 1980 A
4538612 Patrick, Jr. Sep 1985 A
4834757 Brantigan May 1989 A
4863476 Shepperd Sep 1989 A
4995200 Eberhart Feb 1991 A
5006121 Hafeli Apr 1991 A
5019082 Frey et al. May 1991 A
5123926 Pisharodi Jun 1992 A
5133719 Winston Jul 1992 A
5163939 Winston Nov 1992 A
5169402 Elloy Dec 1992 A
5171278 Pisharodi Dec 1992 A
5217475 Kuber Jun 1993 A
5250061 Michelson Oct 1993 A
5320644 Baumgartner Jun 1994 A
5342365 Waldman Aug 1994 A
5387215 Fisher Feb 1995 A
5390683 Pisharodi Feb 1995 A
5454815 Geisser et al. Oct 1995 A
5454827 Aust et al. Oct 1995 A
5464929 Bezwada et al. Nov 1995 A
5522899 Michelson Jun 1996 A
5540693 Fisher Jul 1996 A
5554191 Lahille Sep 1996 A
5595751 Bezwada et al. Jan 1997 A
5597579 Bezwada et al. Jan 1997 A
5601561 Terry et al. Feb 1997 A
5607687 Bezwada et al. Mar 1997 A
5618552 Bezwada et al. Apr 1997 A
5620698 Bezwada et al. Apr 1997 A
5645850 Bezwada et al. Jul 1997 A
5648088 Bezwada et al. Jul 1997 A
5658335 Allen Aug 1997 A
5665122 Kambin Sep 1997 A
5693100 Pisharodi Dec 1997 A
5698213 Jamiolkowski et al. Dec 1997 A
5700583 Jamiolkowski et al. Dec 1997 A
5725531 Shapiro Mar 1998 A
5857995 Thomas et al. Jan 1999 A
5859150 Jamiolkowski et al. Jan 1999 A
5865848 Baker Feb 1999 A
5916228 Ripich et al. Jun 1999 A
5916267 Tienboon Jun 1999 A
5925056 Thomas et al. Jul 1999 A
5976187 Richelsoph Nov 1999 A
5980522 Koros et al. Nov 1999 A
6039761 Li et al. Mar 2000 A
6045579 Hochshuler et al. Apr 2000 A
6053922 Krause et al. Apr 2000 A
6056763 Parsons May 2000 A
6066175 Henderson et al. May 2000 A
6080158 Lin Jun 2000 A
6106557 Robioneck et al. Aug 2000 A
6120508 Grunig et al. Sep 2000 A
6126689 Brett Oct 2000 A
6139558 Wagner Oct 2000 A
6176882 Biedermann et al. Jan 2001 B1
6241733 Nicholson et al. Jun 2001 B1
6251140 Marino et al. Jun 2001 B1
6258093 Edwards et al. Jul 2001 B1
6296644 Saurat et al. Oct 2001 B1
D450676 Huttner Nov 2001 S
6332894 Stalcup et al. Dec 2001 B1
6342074 Simpson Jan 2002 B1
6387130 Stone et al. May 2002 B1
6398793 McGuire Jun 2002 B1
6409766 Brett Jun 2002 B1
6413278 Marchosky Jul 2002 B1
6436101 Hamada Aug 2002 B1
6447518 Krause et al. Sep 2002 B1
6595998 Johnson et al. Jul 2003 B2
6610066 Dinger et al. Aug 2003 B2
6635060 Hanson et al. Oct 2003 B2
RE38335 Aust et al. Nov 2003 E
6641582 Hanson et al. Nov 2003 B1
6660004 Barker et al. Dec 2003 B2
6733535 Michelson May 2004 B2
6755837 Ebner Jun 2004 B2
6764491 Frey Jul 2004 B2
6835208 Marchosky Dec 2004 B2
6840941 Rogers et al. Jan 2005 B2
6878167 Ferree Apr 2005 B2
6949108 Holmes Sep 2005 B2
6966912 Michelson Nov 2005 B2
7018415 McKay Mar 2006 B1
7060073 Frey et al. Jun 2006 B2
7070598 Lim et al. Jul 2006 B2
7087055 Lim et al. Aug 2006 B2
7125424 Banick et al. Oct 2006 B2
7226482 Messerli et al. Jun 2007 B2
7326248 Michelson Feb 2008 B2
7351262 Bindseil et al. Apr 2008 B2
7470273 Dougherty-Shah Dec 2008 B2
7491237 Randall et al. Feb 2009 B2
7503920 Siegal Mar 2009 B2
7572279 Jackson Aug 2009 B2
7575580 Lim et al. Aug 2009 B2
7578820 Moore et al. Aug 2009 B2
7601173 Messerli et al. Oct 2009 B2
7618458 Biedermann et al. Nov 2009 B2
7625377 Veldhuizen et al. Dec 2009 B2
7625394 Molz, IV et al. Dec 2009 B2
7655010 Serhan et al. Feb 2010 B2
7666186 Harp Feb 2010 B2
7666226 Schaller Feb 2010 B2
7670374 Schaller Mar 2010 B2
7674265 Smith et al. Mar 2010 B2
7682400 Zwirkoski Mar 2010 B2
7703727 Selness Apr 2010 B2
7704280 Lechmann et al. Apr 2010 B2
7731751 Butler et al. Jun 2010 B2
7763028 Lim et al. Jul 2010 B2
7771473 Thramann Aug 2010 B2
7785368 Schaller Aug 2010 B2
7799081 McKinley Sep 2010 B2
7803161 Foley et al. Sep 2010 B2
7828849 Lim Nov 2010 B2
7837734 Zucherman et al. Nov 2010 B2
7850733 Baynham et al. Dec 2010 B2
7918874 Siegal Apr 2011 B2
7922719 Ralph et al. Apr 2011 B2
7938857 Garcia-Bengochea et al. May 2011 B2
7942903 Moskowitz et al. May 2011 B2
7963967 Woods Jun 2011 B1
8007535 Hudgins et al. Aug 2011 B2
8012212 Link et al. Sep 2011 B2
8025697 McClellan, III et al. Sep 2011 B2
8034110 Garner et al. Oct 2011 B2
8038703 Dobak, III et al. Oct 2011 B2
8043293 Warnick Oct 2011 B2
8057544 Schaller Nov 2011 B2
8105382 Olmos et al. Jan 2012 B2
8128700 Delurio et al. Mar 2012 B2
8206423 Siegal Jun 2012 B2
8216317 Thibodeau Jul 2012 B2
8241364 Hansell et al. Aug 2012 B2
8262666 Baynham et al. Sep 2012 B2
8267939 Cipoletti et al. Sep 2012 B2
8343193 Johnson et al. Jan 2013 B2
8343222 Cope Jan 2013 B2
8366777 Matthis et al. Feb 2013 B2
8382842 Greenhalgh et al. Feb 2013 B2
8403990 Dryer et al. Mar 2013 B2
8454617 Schaller et al. Jun 2013 B2
8579981 Lim et al. Nov 2013 B2
8628577 Jimenez Jan 2014 B1
8663331 McClellan, III et al. Mar 2014 B2
8845733 O'Neil et al. Sep 2014 B2
8845734 Weiman Sep 2014 B2
8920506 McGuckin, Jr. Dec 2014 B2
8926704 Glerum et al. Jan 2015 B2
8940050 Laurence et al. Jan 2015 B2
8961609 Schaller Feb 2015 B2
8968408 Schaller et al. Mar 2015 B2
9101488 Malandain Aug 2015 B2
9101492 Mangione et al. Aug 2015 B2
9801639 O'Neil et al. Oct 2017 B2
9801640 O'Neil et al. Oct 2017 B2
20020138078 Chappuis Sep 2002 A1
20020143399 Sutcliffe Oct 2002 A1
20020165550 Frey Nov 2002 A1
20020183758 Middleton et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030028251 Mathews Feb 2003 A1
20030135275 Garcia et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030139812 Garcia et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030191531 Berry et al. Oct 2003 A1
20040002761 Rogers et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040030387 Landry et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040059337 Hanson et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040068269 Bonati et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040083000 Keller et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040087947 Lim et al. May 2004 A1
20040102784 Pasquet et al. May 2004 A1
20040102846 Keller et al. May 2004 A1
20040127990 Bartish, Jr. et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040147129 Rolfson Jul 2004 A1
20040220668 Eisermann et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050038431 Bartish et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050096745 Andre et al. May 2005 A1
20050119752 Williams et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050149034 Assell et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050165420 Cha Jul 2005 A1
20050165484 Ferree Jul 2005 A1
20050171541 Boehm et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050177173 Aebi et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050240193 Layne et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050261683 Veldhuizen et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060036244 Spitler et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060058807 Landry et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060064101 Arramon Mar 2006 A1
20060064102 Ebner Mar 2006 A1
20060069436 Sutton et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060074429 Ralph et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060100622 Jackson May 2006 A1
20060111715 Jackson May 2006 A1
20060111728 Abdou May 2006 A1
20060122701 Kiester Jun 2006 A1
20060129244 Ensign Jun 2006 A1
20060142858 Colleran et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060167547 Suddaby Jul 2006 A1
20060189999 Zwirkoski Aug 2006 A1
20060212118 Abernathie Sep 2006 A1
20060229627 Hunt et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060229724 Lechmann et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060235426 Lim et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060253120 Anderson et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060254784 Hartmann et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060265077 Zwirkoski Nov 2006 A1
20060276902 Zipnick et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060293753 Thramann Dec 2006 A1
20070055264 Parmigiani Mar 2007 A1
20070055272 Schaller Mar 2007 A1
20070067035 Falahee Mar 2007 A1
20070093897 Gerbec et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070093901 Grotz et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070142843 Dye Jun 2007 A1
20070162132 Messerli Jul 2007 A1
20070213737 Schermerhorn et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070213826 Smith et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070225726 Dye et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070225815 Keith et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070233130 Suddaby Oct 2007 A1
20070250167 Bray et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070260314 Biyani Nov 2007 A1
20070270957 Heinz Nov 2007 A1
20070270968 Baynham et al. Nov 2007 A1
20080027544 Melkent Jan 2008 A1
20080027550 Link et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080045966 Buttermann et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080051890 Waugh et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080058933 Garner et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080065082 Chang et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080077150 Nguyen Mar 2008 A1
20080077241 Nguyen Mar 2008 A1
20080082173 Delurio et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080091211 Gately Apr 2008 A1
20080097454 DeRidder et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080108990 Mitchell et al. May 2008 A1
20080119935 Alvarez May 2008 A1
20080125865 Abdelgany May 2008 A1
20080133012 McGuckin Jun 2008 A1
20080140085 Gately et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080154379 Steiner et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080172128 Perez-Cruet et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080208255 Siegal Aug 2008 A1
20080221586 Garcia-Bengochea et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080221687 Viker Sep 2008 A1
20080234732 Landry et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080234733 Scrantz et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080243126 Gutierrez et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080243255 Butler et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080249628 Altarac et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080255563 Farr et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080255574 Dye Oct 2008 A1
20080269904 Voorhies Oct 2008 A1
20080312743 Vila et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090030423 Puno Jan 2009 A1
20090054898 Gleason Feb 2009 A1
20090054911 Mueller et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090062807 Song Mar 2009 A1
20090076607 Aalsma et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090088789 O'Neil et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090112217 Hester Apr 2009 A1
20090143859 McClellan, III et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090164016 Georgy et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090182431 Butler et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090192616 Zielinski Jul 2009 A1
20090216234 Farr et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090234364 Crook Sep 2009 A1
20090240335 Arcenio et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090276049 Weiland Nov 2009 A1
20090299479 Jones et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100016968 Moore Jan 2010 A1
20100030217 Mitusina Feb 2010 A1
20100076502 Guyer et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100094422 Hansell et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100100098 Norton et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100125334 Krueger May 2010 A1
20100161060 Schaller et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100174321 Schaller Jul 2010 A1
20100185290 Compton et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100191241 McCormack et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100198263 Siegal et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100211076 Germain et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100211107 Muhanna Aug 2010 A1
20100217269 Landes Aug 2010 A1
20100234849 Bouadi Sep 2010 A1
20100249935 Slivka et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100256768 Lim et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100274358 Mueller et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100280619 Yuan et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100305700 Ben-Arye et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100305704 Messerli et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100331845 Foley et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110004216 Amendola et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110009970 Puno Jan 2011 A1
20110029083 Hynes et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110029085 Hynes et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110035011 Cain Feb 2011 A1
20110106260 Laurence et al. May 2011 A1
20110112586 Guyer et al. May 2011 A1
20110125266 Rodgers et al. May 2011 A1
20110190891 Suh et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110276142 Niemiec et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110282459 McClellan, III et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110301712 Palmatier et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110319898 O'Neil et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110319899 O'Neil et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110319998 O'Neil et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110319999 O'Neil et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110320000 O'Neil et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120035730 Spann Feb 2012 A1
20120165943 Mangione et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120209383 Tsuang et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120277877 Smith et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120310352 DiMauro et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130006362 Biedermann et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130023937 Biedermann et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130035762 Siegal et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130079790 Stein et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130109925 Horton et al. May 2013 A1
20130110239 Siegal et al. May 2013 A1
20130116791 Theofilos May 2013 A1
20130138214 Greenhalgh et al. May 2013 A1
20130150906 Kerboul et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130173004 Greenhalgh et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130190875 Shulock et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130238006 O'Neil et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130268077 You et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130310937 Pimenta Nov 2013 A1
20140025170 Lim et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140039626 Mitchell Feb 2014 A1
20140052259 Garner et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140058512 Petersheim Feb 2014 A1
20140058513 Gahman et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140172103 O'Neil et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140172105 Frasier et al. Jun 2014 A1
20150032212 O'Neil et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150094812 Cain Apr 2015 A1
20150196400 Dace Jul 2015 A1
20160038306 O'Neil et al. Feb 2016 A1
20170128231 O'Neil et al. May 2017 A1
20180028200 O'Neil et al. Feb 2018 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (37)
Number Date Country
197 10 392 Jul 1999 DE
10357960 Jul 2005 DE
609084 Aug 1994 EP
1283026 Feb 2003 EP
1308132 May 2003 EP
1405602 Apr 2004 EP
1605836 Dec 2005 EP
1829486 Sep 2007 EP
2 874 814 Mar 2006 FR
2948277 Jan 2011 FR
2006-501901 Jan 2006 JP
9204423 Sep 1992 WO
980345668 Aug 1998 WO
99060956 Dec 1999 WO
99063914 Dec 1999 WO
0024343 May 2000 WO
0074605 Dec 2000 WO
2002003870 Jan 2002 WO
2003003951 Jan 2003 WO
2004030582 Apr 2004 WO
2004069033 Aug 2004 WO
2004080316 Sep 2004 WO
2005094297 Oct 2005 WO
2006044920 Apr 2006 WO
2006072941 Jul 2006 WO
2006118944 Nov 2006 WO
2007048012 Apr 2007 WO
2008005627 Jan 2008 WO
2010011348 Jan 2010 WO
2010075555 Jul 2010 WO
2010121002 Oct 2010 WO
2011013047 Feb 2011 WO
2011060087 May 2011 WO
2012027490 Mar 2012 WO
2012103254 Aug 2012 WO
2012129197 Sep 2012 WO
2013149611 Oct 2013 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (19)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 13/163,397, filed Jun. 17, 2011, Universal Trial for Lateral Cages.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/163,427, filed Jun. 17, 2011, Lateral Spondylolisthesis Reduction Cage.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/163,471, filed Jun. 17, 2011, Instruments and Methods for Non-Parallel Disc Space Preparation.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/163,496, filed Jun. 17, 2011, Flexible Vertebral Body Shavers.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/163,517, filed Jun. 17, 2011, Multi-Segment Lateral Cage Adapted to Flex Substantially in the Coronal Plane.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/496,765, filed Sep. 25, 2014, Lateral Spondylolisthesis Reduction Cage.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/919,863, filed Oct. 22, 2015, Lateral Spondylolisthesis Reduction Cage.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/415,299, filed Jan. 25, 2017, Lateral Spondylolisthesis Reduction Cage.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/726,515, filed Oct. 6, 2017, Lateral Spondylolisthesis Reduction Cage and Instruments and Methods for Non-Parallel Disc Space Preparation.
Allcock, “Polyphosphazenes”; The Encyclopedia of Polymer Science; 1988; pp. 31-41; vol. 13; Wiley Intersciences, John Wiley & Sons.
Cohn,“Biodegradable PEO/PLA Block Copolymers”; Journal of Biomedical Materials Research; 1988; pp. 993-1009; vol. 22; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Cohn, “Polymer Preprints”;Journal of Biomaterials Research; 1989; p. 498; Biomaterials Research Laboratory, Casali Institute of Applied Chemistry, Israel.
Heller, “Poly (Ortho Esters)”; Handbook of Biodegradable Polymers; edited by Domb; et al; Hardwood Academic Press; 1997; pp. 99-118.
Japanese Office Action for Application No. 2013-542047, dated Sep. 8, 2015 (12 pages).
Japanese Office Action for Application No. 2016-135826, dated Jun. 6, 2017 (7 pages).
Kemnitzer, “Degradable Polymers Derived From the Amino Acid L-Tyrosine”; 1997; pp. 251-272; edited by Domb, et al., Hardwood Academic Press.
Khoo, Axilif address spondy from the caudal approach. Minimally Invasive Correction of Grade I and II Isthmic Spondylolisthesis using AxiaLiF for L5/S1 Fusion, pp. 45-0123 Rev B Sep. 15, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/178,315, filed May 14, 2009.
Vandorpe, “Biodegradable Polyphosphazenes for Biomedical Applications”; Handbook of Biodegradable Polymers; 1997; pp. 161-182; Hardwood Academic Press.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180036141 A1 Feb 2018 US
Provisional Applications (6)
Number Date Country
61466302 Mar 2011 US
61397716 Nov 2010 US
61410177 Nov 2010 US
61385958 Sep 2010 US
61379194 Sep 2010 US
61358220 Jun 2010 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13163427 Jun 2011 US
Child 14496765 US
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 15415299 Jan 2017 US
Child 15788178 US
Parent 14919863 Oct 2015 US
Child 15415299 US
Parent 14496765 Sep 2014 US
Child 14919863 US
Continuation in Parts (4)
Number Date Country
Parent 13163471 Jun 2011 US
Child 13163427 US
Parent 13163496 Jun 2011 US
Child 13163471 US
Parent 13163517 Jun 2011 US
Child 13163496 US
Parent 13163397 Jun 2011 US
Child 13163517 US