Lateral interbody fusion procedures are currently indicated for patients with ≦grade 1 spondylolisthesis. However, correction from the lateral approach is currently limited to regaining height and lordosis with only a low degree of spondylolisthesis correction, as the straight or lordotic cage is impacted during insertion to expand the disc space. Significant spondylolisthesis reduction is currently accomplished via a posterior approach with supplemental posterior fixation devices, including facet screws, translaminar screws, pedicle screws and rods, as well as intraspinous process devices or plates.
Although current lateral cages are characterized by symmetric superior and inferior geometries, the normal and degenerated discs do not have such similar superior and inferior endplate geometries. The lack of conformity of the cage endplate to the pertinent vertebral body can promote cage malpositioning during insertion, improper load balancing, increased settling and/or subsidence, as well as device movement following implantation.
Some surgeons using lateral cages attach lateral plating to the cage to achieve enhanced cage securement accompanied by some degree of biomechanical stabilization. However, most currently available lateral cages do not provide for plate attachment.
US 2004-0220668 (Eisermann) discloses a method for correcting spondylolisthesis from the lateral approach is provided in which a pair of insertion members are inserted laterally into upper and lower vertebrae, a connecting member is affixed to the insertion members, and a rotating force is applied to the connecting member to encourage the upper and lower vertebrae into a desired position relative to one another. In
US Patent Publication No. 2010-0016968 (Moore) discloses an apparatus and method that allow for the realignment and stabilization of adjacent vertebrae. An implant of this invention both repositions adjacent vertebrae and remains in situ to maintain the new position. The implant has two halves which are interlocked such that they can slide horizontally with respect to each other. Movement of the implant halves and their respective positions are controlled by external set screw and internal locking block within the implant. The implant includes radial anchors which fit into alignment slots made in the misaligned vertebra by the disclosed method. The set screws are used to advance the halves of the implant which in turn move the misaligned vertebrae back into correct positions. The correct position of the vertebrae is locked in place through a bolt and a plate.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,342,074 (Simpson) discloses a spinal fusion implant and method for maintaining proper lumbar spine curvature and intervertebral disc spacing where a degenerative disc has been removed. The one-piece implant comprises a hollow body having an access passage for insertion of bone graft material into the intervertebral space after the implant has been affixed to adjacent vertebrae. The implant provides a pair of screw-receiving passages that are oppositely inclined relative to a central plane. In one embodiment, the screw-receiving passages enable the head of an orthopedic screw to be retained entirely within the access passage. A spinal fusion implant embodied in the present invention may be inserted anteriorally or laterally.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,878,167 (Ferree) discloses an osteotomy of a portion of a vertebral endplate and/or vertebral body allowing for easier insertion of a device that fits tightly into a disc space. It also discloses a mechanical device to hold the osteotomized portion of the vertebra against the vertebral body after the intradiscal device is placed. The device may be removed after the pieces of vertebra heal and fuse together. It further discloses a device secured to a side of the vertebral body in
The present invention relates to an intervertebral fusion device comprising inferior and superior fusion cages that provide an ability to correct spondylolisthesis via lateral insertion and in-situ adjustment.
Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, there is provided an intervertebral fusion device for correcting spondylolisthesis in a patient, comprising:
Also in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a method for correcting spondylolisthesis in a patient, comprising the steps of:
Also in accordance with the present invention, there is provided an intervertebral fusion device for correcting spondylolisthesis in a patient, comprising:
Also in accordance with the present invention, there is provided an intervertebral fusion device for correcting spondylolisthesis in a patient, comprising:
Also in accordance with the present invention, there is provided an intervertebral fusion device for correcting spondylolisthesis in a patient, comprising:
so that rotation of the pinion effects relative movement of the upper and lower walls in the anterior-posterior direction.
a-2b and 3 disclose the implantation of the fusion device of the present invention, in which the cages of the device are implanted into the disc space, brought together, and then locked in place.
a-4d show various views of the intervertebral fusion device of the present invention.
e-4f show various views of the cages of an intervertebral fusion device of the present invention locked with a locking plate.
a-b disclose a compression-directed inserter of the present invention having distal pins, and the insertion of a cage of the present invention with this inserter.
c-d disclose a compression-directed inserter of the present invention having distal blades, and the insertion of a cage of the present invention with this inserter.
a-7b disclose how a compression-directed inserter of the present invention having nested blades aligns the cages of the present invention when activated.
a-8d disclose how the cages of one embodiment of the present invention are aligned by a rotary spreader, and are locked by a particular locking plate.
a-9g disclose various views of a dual linkage embodiment of the present invention.
a-d disclose full and partial views of a rack-and-pinion embodiment of the present invention, some of which are inserted into a disc space.
a-11e disclose various views of the rack-and-pinion embodiment of the present invention.
In use, the devices of the present invention accomplish improved and controlled spondylolisthesis correction with fusion from the lateral approach. The lateral cage devices of the present invention also provide for intra-operative trialing and selection to enhance conformance of the cage geometry to the vertebral body endplates bounding the targeted disc space. The fusion device of the present invention provides for direct attachment of its superior and inferior cages to the lateral aspects of the opposing vertebral bodies.
Several devices and methods for correcting spondylolisthesis with fusion from the lateral approach are disclosed. All incorporate a superior and inferior fusion cages that are fixedly attached to the corresponding vertebral bodies. The fixed attachment can be accomplished by using pre-attached plates, or by incorporating internal screws (e.g., the STALIF approach) and/or lateral keels. Following implantation, the superior and inferior cages are aligned in-situ via various activation means that are further discussed below, and then locked in place.
The interior, contacting surfaces of the cages that effect intra-device attachment contain alignment and securement features that allow for controlled intra-operative manipulation of the spine in the sagittal plane following individual fixed attachment of the cages to the superior and inferior vertebral bodies. These features can include but are not limited to teeth, barbs, and dovetails.
Both the superior and inferior cages can include features on their outer surfaces that can enhance securement to the vertebral body endplate. These features include fins, barbs, teeth, osteoconductive surface morphology (porosity) and coatings (such as HA and TCP). The superior and inferior cages can also include graft-retention windows and pockets to facilitate the long-term fusion of the two vertebral bodies of the functional spinal unit.
The inner contacting surfaces of the cage can be flat to allow for the incremental lineal adjustment of the relative cage positions. Alternatively, these surfaces can be domed so as to enable the accurate adjustment of the vertebral bodies to a centered position in the flexion/extension plane (i.e., to the center of rotation).
The external geometry of the superior and inferior cages can be flat or lordotic, and can be domed or angled in various plans to enhance their conformance to the vertebral body endplates and to address spinal deformity and/or scoliosis.
Following fixed attachment to the vertebral body, the superior and inferior cages may be aligned by several means, including the following:
a-2b and 3 disclose the implantation of a first embodiment of a fusion device of the present invention, in which the cages 501,502 of the device are implanted into the disc space, brought together, and then locked in place with a locking plate 503.
a and
As shown in
As shown in
Now referring to
In some embodiments, the lower surface of the upper plate and the upper surface of the lower cage include tongue-and-groove feature. Preferably, the tongue-and-groove feature runs from about the anterior wall to about the posterior wall. Preferably, the tongue-and-groove feature comprises an expanding recess 29 and more preferably comprises a dovetail 31.
In some embodiments, the lower surface of the upper cage and the upper surface of the lower cage include a ridge and recess feature 33 that runs in a proximal-distal direction.
In some embodiments, the proximal wall of the upper cage has a height Hu-p, the anterior wall of the upper cage has a height Hu-a, and wherein the height of the proximal wall of the upper cage is greater than the height of the anterior wall of the upper cage.
In some embodiments, the proximal wall of the upper cage has an upper portion 35 having a upper through-hole 37 located above the anterior wall and adapted for receiving a bone screw.
In some embodiments, the proximal wall of the lower cage has a height Hl-p, the anterior wall of the lower cage has a height Hl-a, and wherein the height of the proximal wall of the lower cage is greater than the height of the anterior wall of the lower cage.
In some embodiments, the proximal wall of the lower cage has a lower portion 39 having a lower through-hole 41 located beneath the anterior wall and adapted for receiving a bone screw.
In some locking plate embodiments, the proximal wall of the upper cage has a lower portion 43 having an lower through-hole 45 located beneath the anterior wall of the upper cage and adapted for receiving a screw. Likewise, the proximal wall of the lower cage has an upper portion 47 having an upper through-hole 49 located above the anterior wall of the lower cage and adapted for receiving a bone fastener such as a screw. The device further comprises:
In some embodiments that promote fusion, the upper cage further comprises a lower surface 13 and a throughole 59 running from the upper surface to the lower surface. In some embodiments that promote fusion, the lower cage further comprises an upper surface and a throughole running from the upper surface to the lower surface. Likewise,
the anterior wall further comprises a throughole 61 running therethrough. These throughholes are of a size adapted to promote fusion
In some embodiments, the distal end wall of each of the upper and lower cages has a taper 63 for ease of insertion.
In the first embodiment, and now referring to
a-b disclose a compression-directed inserter 65 of the present invention having distal pins 67, and the insertion of a cage of the present invention with this inserter.
Now referring to
Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, there is provided (claim 16) a method for correcting spondylolisthesis in a patient, comprising the steps of:
In some embodiments, the moving step is accomplished with a rotary spreader.
In a second embodiment, and now referring to
Now referring to
In some embodiments, and now referring to
Now referring to
In some embodiments, the first groove is present upon the lower surface of the anterior wall of the upper cage, and the second groove is present upon the upper surface of the anterior wall of the lower cage. In other embodiments, the first groove is present upon the lower surface of the posterior wall of the upper cage, and the second groove is present upon the upper surface of the posterior wall of the lower cage.
In some embodiments, the device of the second embodiment further comprises a third groove 109 present upon the lower surface of the upper cage between the anterior and posterior walls, and a fourth groove 111 present upon the upper surface of the lower cage between the anterior and posterior walls, and wherein the lower surface of the upper cage contacts the upper surface of the lower plate so that the third and fourth grooves form a second throughhole 113 running from the proximal wall to about the distal wall, the second throughhole adapted for insertion of a spreader therein.
In a third embodiment, and now referring to
In some embodiments, and now referring to
In some embodiments, and now referring to
Now referring to
Now referring to
In some aspects of this third embodiment, the proximal wall of the upper cage has a height, the anterior wall of the upper cage has a height, and wherein the height of the proximal wall of the upper cage is greater than the height of the anterior wall of the upper cage. In some embodiments thereof, the proximal wall of the upper cage has an upper portion 153 having a upper through-hole 155 located above the anterior wall and adapted for receiving a bone screw.
In other aspects of this third embodiment, the proximal wall of the lower cage has a height, the anterior wall of the lower cage has a height, and wherein the height of the proximal wall of the lower cage is greater than the height of the anterior wall of the lower cage. In some embodiments thereof, the proximal wall of the lower cage has a lower portion 157 having a lower through-hole 159 located beneath the anterior wall and adapted for receiving a bone screw.
In some embodiments, the upper cage has a throughole 161 running from the upper surface to the lower surface. This throughhole is adapted for promoting fusion
In a fourth embodiment, the alignment means includes a rack-and-pinion. A pinion located between the upper and lower walls and extending laterally can be rotated to move racks extending in the anterior-posterior direction and thereby reduce spondylolisthesis.
Now referring to
In some aspects of the fourth embodiment, the length of the device is at least three times the height of the device.
In some embodiments, the upper and lower walls each have at least one hole 195 therethrough to facilitate fusion through the device. In others, the anterior and posterior walls each have at least one hole 197 therethrough to facilitate fusion through the device.
In some embodiments, the rack extends from the inner surface of the upper wall. In others, the rack extends from the inner surface of the lower wall.
In some embodiments, the pinion comprises a proximal end 199 having a feature 201 for receiving a rotary tool.
In some embodiments, at least one of the anterior and posterior walls is integral with at least one of the upper and lower walls.
In some embodiments, at least one of the anterior and posterior walls is removable.
The embodiments of the present invention may optionally a securement plate that attaches to both the device of the present invention and the vertebral bodies. This securement plate secures the position of the device and provides supplemental stabilization.
In general, the devices of the present invention are suited for substantially lateral insertion into the disc space. In some embodiments, the cages are inserted through a more anterolateral insertion angle.
Now referring to
In some embodiments, as in
The lateral spondylolisthesis reduction fusion devices of the present invention may be produced from a single material or from multiple materials. These materials include metallics (such as Ti, Ti alloys such as nitinol, stainless steel, and cobalt-chrome), polymeric materials (including PEEK, PEAK, polypropylene, polyethylene terephthalate (PET), UHMWPE), biologic materials (including allograft, hydroxyapatite, TCP and CaPO4), and ceramic materials including silicon nitrides, and zirconia-containing ceramics. The plate, fasteners, or locking mechanisms can be produced from metallics or polymers for enhance durability.
Additionally, modified versions of this concept can be designed to correct spondylolisthesis with superior and inferior cages that are inserted from the anterior, anterior-lateral or posterior approaches.
The cages of the present invention are preferably inserted either from a right lateral or left lateral approach.
Following standard access and disc preparation procedures, the superior and inferior cages are inserted and affixed to the opposed vertebral bodies with screws or bone fasteners. Spondylolisthesis correction is then performed with the disclosed compressor or with a rotary tool. Optionally, locking members are then applied to the superior and inferior cages to fix the orientation of the segments.
Also in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a method of implanting an intervertebral device between opposed vertebral bodies, comprising the steps of:
In some embodiments of the present invention, the fusion device is angled to provide either lordosis or kyphosis. In embodiments in which lordosis is desired, the height of the anterior wall exceeds the height of the posterior wall. That is, in some embodiments, a combined height of the anterior walls exceeds the combined heights of the posterior walls. An example of such a lordotic implant is shown in
It is believed by the present inventors that the devices disclosed herein appear to be the first intervertebral devices having a flange that connects to a side of a vertebral body. Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a method of inserting a fusion device between opposed vertebral bodies, comprising the steps of:
Although the cages of the present invention are disclosed as having flanges that extend beyond the disc space for attachment to the sides of the opposed vertebral bodies, it is also contemplated that the cages of the present invention may be attached to the opposed vertebral bodies via zero profile throughholes. These zero profile throughholes are provided both a) at the upper edge of the proximal side wall of the upper half component and b) at the lower edge of the proximal side wall of the lower half component.
Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, there is provided an intervertebral fusion device for correcting spondylolisthesis in a patient, comprising:
Although the above description discloses how to make and use implantable devices to correct spondylolisthesis, it is within the scope of the invention to use these devices as instruments to correct retrolisthesis as well. Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a method for correcting spondylolisthesis in a patient, comprising the steps of:
Although the above description discloses how to make and use devices in the context of correcting spondylolisthesis, it is within the scope of the invention to use similar devices to correct retrolisthesis as well.
The cross section of the beams are sufficiently wide in the anterior-posterior direction making them resistant to bending in the transverse plane. The mechanism within the handle is to pivot the beams. This can be done with a ratchet and pawl linkage which moves the top beam one click with each squeeze, or a sliding collar that advances distally along the beams to bring them in line with each other, or a wedge/roller that advances along the edge of the superior beam or a post and angled slot mechanism that aligns the two beams, or with a geared scissor mechanism such that the full motion of the handle corresponds to a small angular change of the beams. The controlled motion of the beams relative to each other is advantageous as the operating surgeon generally has a pre-determined amount of reduction in mind for the surgery. This amount can be determined via radiograph or inter-operatively. For example if a total of 6 mm of reduction is desired, the handle can be ratcheted 1 mm at a time until the value of 6 mm is reached.
Therefore, there is provided a spondylolisthesis reduction tool comprising:
Preferably, the handle portion comprises a trigger 311 adapted to pivotally move the second beam.
This application claims priority from provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 61/397,716, filed Nov. 30, 2010, entitled Lateral Spondylolisthesis Reduction Cage, the specification of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. This application claims priority from provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 61/358,220, filed Jun. 24, 2010, entitled Instruments and Methods for Non-Parallel Disc Space Preparation, and is related to non-provisional U.S. Ser. No. 13/163,471, filed on Jun. 17, 2011, entitled Instruments and Methods for Non-Parallel Disc Space Preparation, the specifications of which are incorporated by reference in their entireties. This application claims priority from U.S. Ser. No. 61/379,194, filed on Sep. 1, 2010, and entitled “Flexible Vertebral Body Shavers”, and is related to non-provisional U.S. Ser. No. 13/163,496, filed on Jun. 17, 2011, entitled “Flexible Vertebral Body Shavers”, the specifications of which are incorporated by reference in their entireties. This application claims priority from provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 61/385,958, filed Sep. 23, 2010, and entitled “Multi-Segment Lateral Cages adapted to Flex Substantially in the Coronal Plane”, the specification of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. This application claims priority from provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 61/410,177, filed Nov. 4, 2010, and entitled “Multi-Segment Lateral Cages adapted to Flex Substantially in the Coronal Plane”, the specification of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. This application is related to non-provisional U.S. Ser. No. 13/163,517, filed on Jun. 17, 2011, entitled “Multi-Segment Lateral Cages adapted to Flex Substantially in the Coronal Plane”, the specification of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. This application claims priority from provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 61/466,302, filed Mar. 22, 2011, and entitled “Universal Trial for Cages”, and is related to non-provisional U.S. Ser. No. 13/163,397, filed on Jun. 17, 2011, entitled “Universal Trial for Cages”, the specifications of which are incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4105034 | Shalaby | Aug 1978 | A |
4130639 | Shalaby | Dec 1978 | A |
4140678 | Shalaby | Feb 1979 | A |
4141087 | Shalaby | Feb 1979 | A |
4205399 | Shalaby | Jun 1980 | A |
4208511 | Shalaby | Jun 1980 | A |
5006121 | Hafeli | Apr 1991 | A |
5019082 | Frey | May 1991 | A |
5133719 | Winston | Jul 1992 | A |
5163939 | Winston | Nov 1992 | A |
5169402 | Elloy | Dec 1992 | A |
5171278 | Pisharodi | Dec 1992 | A |
5250061 | Michelson | Oct 1993 | A |
5320644 | Baumgartner | Jun 1994 | A |
5342365 | Waldman | Aug 1994 | A |
5387215 | Fisher | Feb 1995 | A |
5390683 | Pisharodi | Feb 1995 | A |
5454815 | Geisser | Oct 1995 | A |
5454827 | Aust | Oct 1995 | A |
5464929 | Bezwada | Nov 1995 | A |
5522899 | Michelson | Jun 1996 | A |
5540693 | Fisher | Jul 1996 | A |
5595751 | Bezwada | Jan 1997 | A |
5597579 | Bezwada | Jan 1997 | A |
5601561 | Terry | Feb 1997 | A |
5607687 | Bezwada | Mar 1997 | A |
5618552 | Bezwada | Apr 1997 | A |
5620698 | Bezwada | Apr 1997 | A |
5645850 | Bezwada | Jul 1997 | A |
5648088 | Bezwada | Jul 1997 | A |
5658335 | Allen | Aug 1997 | A |
5665122 | Kambin | Sep 1997 | A |
5693100 | Pisharodi | Dec 1997 | A |
5698213 | Jamiolkowski | Dec 1997 | A |
5700583 | Jamiolkowski | Dec 1997 | A |
5725531 | Shapiro | Mar 1998 | A |
5857995 | Thomas | Jan 1999 | A |
5859150 | Jamiolkowski | Jan 1999 | A |
5925056 | Thomas | Jul 1999 | A |
5976187 | Richelsoph | Nov 1999 | A |
5980522 | Koros et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6039761 | Li | Mar 2000 | A |
6053922 | Krause | Apr 2000 | A |
6080158 | Lin | Jun 2000 | A |
6106557 | Robioneck et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6120508 | Grunig | Sep 2000 | A |
6126689 | Brett | Oct 2000 | A |
6251140 | Marino | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258093 | Edwards | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6296644 | Saurat | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6342074 | Simpson | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6387130 | Stone | May 2002 | B1 |
6409766 | Brett | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6436101 | Hamada | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6447518 | Krause | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6610066 | Dinger | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6635060 | Hanson | Oct 2003 | B2 |
RE38335 | Aust | Nov 2003 | E |
6641582 | Hanson | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6660004 | Barker | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6755837 | Ebner | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6764491 | Frey | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6840941 | Rogers | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6878167 | Ferree | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6966912 | Michelson | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7060073 | Frey | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7070598 | Lim | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7087055 | Lim | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7125424 | Banick | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7226482 | Messerli | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7351262 | Bindseil | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7491237 | Randall et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7572279 | Jackson | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7578820 | Moore | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7601173 | Messerli | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7618458 | Biedermann et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7625377 | Veldhuizen | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7625394 | Molz, IV | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7666186 | Harp | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7674265 | Smith | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7682400 | Zwirkoski | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7803161 | Foley | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7938857 | Garcia-Bengochea et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8012212 | Link et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8025697 | McClellan, III | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8038703 | Dobak et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8043293 | Warnick | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8128700 | Delurio et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8216317 | Thibodeau | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8343222 | Cope | Jan 2013 | B2 |
20020138078 | Chappuis | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030191531 | Berry et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040030387 | Landry et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040059337 | Hanson | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040083000 | Keller et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040102784 | Pasquet | May 2004 | A1 |
20040102846 | Keller et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040127990 | Bartish | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040147129 | Rolfson | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040220668 | Eisermann | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050177173 | Aebi et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060064102 | Ebner | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069436 | Sutton | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060100622 | Jackson | May 2006 | A1 |
20060111715 | Jackson | May 2006 | A1 |
20060111728 | Abdou | May 2006 | A1 |
20060142858 | Colleran | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060189999 | Zwirkoski | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060235426 | Lim | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060253120 | Anderson | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265077 | Zwirkoski | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060293753 | Thramann | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070055264 | Parmigiani | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070067035 | Falahee | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070162132 | Messerli | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070213737 | Schermerhorn | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070225815 | Keith | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233130 | Suddaby | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070260314 | Biyani | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270968 | Baynham et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080027544 | Melkent | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080027550 | Link et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080045966 | Buttermann | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080051890 | Waugh et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080065082 | Chang | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077150 | Nguyen | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077241 | Nguyen | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082173 | Delurio | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097454 | DeRidder | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080108990 | Mitchell | May 2008 | A1 |
20080125865 | Abdelgany | May 2008 | A1 |
20080133012 | McGuckin | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080140085 | Gately | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154379 | Steiner et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080208255 | Siegal | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080221586 | Garcia-Bengochea | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080221687 | Viker | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080234732 | Landry et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080234733 | Scrantz | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080243126 | Gutierrez | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080243255 | Butler | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080249628 | Altarac | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080255563 | Farr | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080312743 | Vila | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090030423 | Puno | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090054898 | Gleason | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090054911 | Mueller | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090062807 | Song | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090076607 | Aalsma | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090143859 | McClellan, III | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090182431 | Butler | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090192616 | Zielinski | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090216234 | Farr | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090240335 | Arcenio | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090299479 | Jones | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100016968 | Moore | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100030217 | Mitusina | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100076502 | Guyer | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100174321 | Schaller | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100185290 | Compton | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191241 | McCormack | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100198263 | Siegal | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100211107 | Muhanna | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100217269 | Landes | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100249935 | Slivka | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100256768 | Lim | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100280619 | Yuan | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100305704 | Messerli et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331845 | Foley | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110004216 | Amendola | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110029083 | Hynes | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110029085 | Hynes | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110106260 | Laurence | May 2011 | A1 |
20110112586 | Guyer | May 2011 | A1 |
20110125266 | Rodgers | May 2011 | A1 |
20110282459 | McClellan, III | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110319898 | O'Neil | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110319899 | O'Neil | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110319998 | O'Neil | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110319999 | O'Neil | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110320000 | O'Neil | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20130035762 | Siegal | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130173004 | Greenhalgh | Jul 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
609084 | Sep 1997 | EP |
1283026 | Sep 2003 | EP |
1405602 | Apr 2004 | EP |
1605836 | Dec 2005 | EP |
1308132 | Dec 2006 | EP |
1829486 | Sep 2007 | EP |
WO 9214423 | Sep 1992 | WO |
WO 9834568 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO 9960956 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0203870 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 03003951 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 2004080316 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2006072941 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO 2010011348 | Jan 2010 | WO |
WO 2010075555 | Oct 2010 | WO |
WO 2010121002 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO 2011060087 | May 2011 | WO |
WO 2012027490 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO 2012103254 | Aug 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Vandorpe, “Biodegradable Polyphosphazenes for Biomedical Applications”; Handbook of Biodegradable Polymers; 1997; pp. 161-182; Hardwood Academic Press. |
Allcock, “Polyphosphazenes”; The Encyclopedia of Polymer Science; 1988; pp. 31-41; vol. 13; Wiley Intersciences, John Wiley & Sons. |
Cohn, “Polymer Preprints”; Journal of Biomaterials Research; 1989; p. 498; Biomaterials Research Labortatory, Casali Institute of Applied Chemistry, Israel. |
Cohn, “Biodegradable PEO/PLA Block Copolymers”; Journal of Biomedical Materials Research; 1988; pp. 993-1009; vol. 22; John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
Heller, “Poly (Otrho Esters)”; Handbook of Biodegradable Polymers; edited by Domb; et al; Hardwood Academic Press; 1997; pp. 99-118. |
Kemnitzer, “Degradable Polymers Derived From the Amino Acid L-Tyrosine”; 1997; pp. 251-272; edited by Domb, et. al., Hardwood Academic Press. |
Khoo, Axilif address spongy from the caudal approach. Minimally Invasive Correction of Grage I and II Isthmic Spondylolisthesis using AsiaLiF for L5/S1 Fusion, pp. 45-0123 Rev B Sep. 15, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/009,546, filed Dec. 28, 2007 Rodgers. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/140,926, filed Dec. 26, 2008 Spann. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/178,315, filed May 14, 2009 Spann. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110319999 A1 | Dec 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61397716 | Nov 2010 | US | |
61358220 | Jun 2010 | US | |
61379194 | Sep 2010 | US | |
61385958 | Sep 2010 | US | |
61410177 | Nov 2010 | US | |
61466302 | Mar 2011 | US |