Patent Grant
9290725
The present invention relates to large detergent particles.
There is a desired for coloured solid detergent products, unfortunately it is found that such products can give rise to unacceptable coloured staining.
WO9932599 describes a method of manufacturing detergent particles, being an extrusion method in which a builder and surfactant, the latter comprising as a major component a sulphated or sulphonated anionic surfactant, are fed into an extruder, mechanically worked at a temperature of at least 40° C., preferably at least 60° C., and extruded through an extrusion head having a multiplicity of extrusion apertures. In most examples, the surfactant is fed to the extruder along with builder in a weight ratio of more than 1 part builder to 2 parts surfactant. The extrudate apparently required further drying. In Example 6, PAS paste was dried and extruded. Such PAS noodles are well known in the prior art. The noodles are typically cylindrical in shape and their length exceeds their diameter, as described in example 2.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,022,660 discloses a process for the preparation of a detergent particle having a coating.
Surprisingly we have found that large coated detergent particles coloured with anionic or non-ionic dyes in the core give low levels of staining. The invention may also increase the photostability of the dye in the product on storage. We have also found that the dye appears brighter if it is in the core rather than the coating.
In a further aspect, the present invention provides a coated detergent particle that is a concentrated formulation with more surfactant than inorganic solid. Only by having the coating encasing the surfactant which is soft can one have such a particulate concentrate where the unit dose required for a wash is reduced. Adding solvent to the core would result by converting the particle into a liquid formulation. On the other hand, having a greater amount of inorganic solid would result in a less concentrated formulation; a high inorganic content would take one back to conventional low surfactant concentration granular powder. The coated detergent particle of the present invention sits in the middle of the two conventional (liquid and granular) formats.
In one aspect the present invention provides a coated detergent particle having maximum perpendicular dimensions x, y and z, wherein x is from 1 to 2 mm, y is from 2 to 8 mm (preferably 3 to 8 mm), and z is from 2 to 8 mm (preferably 3 to 8 mm), wherein the particle comprises:
Unless otherwise stated all wt % refer to the total percentage in the particle as dry weights.
Shape
Preferably the coated detergent particle is curved.
The coated detergent particle may be lenticular (shaped like a whole dried lentil), an oblate ellipsoid, where z and y are the equatorial diameters and x is the polar diameter; preferably y=z.
The coated detergent particle may be shaped as a disc.
Preferably the coated laundry detergent particle does not have hole; that is to say, the coated laundry detergent particle does not have a conduit passing there though that passes through the core, i.e., the coated detergent particle has a topologic genus of zero.
Core
Surfactant
The coated detergent particle comprises between 40 to 90 wt %, preferably 50 to 90 wt % of a surfactant, most preferably 70 to 90 wt %. In general, the nonionic and anionic surfactants of the surfactant system may be chosen from the surfactants described “Surface Active Agents” Vol. 1, by Schwartz & Perry, Interscience 1949, Vol. 2 by Schwartz, Perry & Berch, Interscience 1958, in the current edition of “McCutcheon's Emulsifiers and Detergents” published by Manufacturing Confectioners Company or in “Tenside-Taschenbuch”, H. Stache, 2nd Edn., Carl Hauser Verlag, 1981. Preferably the surfactants used are saturated.
Anionic Surfactants
Suitable anionic detergent compounds which may be used are usually water-soluble alkali metal salts of organic sulphates and sulphonates having alkyl radicals containing from about 8 to about 22 carbon atoms, the term alkyl being used to include the alkyl portion of higher acyl radicals. Examples of suitable synthetic anionic detergent compounds are sodium and potassium alkyl sulphates, especially those obtained by sulphating higher C8 to C18 alcohols, produced for example from tallow or coconut oil, sodium and potassium alkyl C9 to C20 benzene sulphonates, particularly sodium linear secondary alkyl C10 to C15 benzene sulphonates; and sodium alkyl glyceryl ether sulphates, especially those ethers of the higher alcohols derived from tallow or coconut oil and synthetic alcohols derived from petroleum. Most preferred anionic surfactants are sodium lauryl ether sulfate (SLES), particularly preferred with 1 to 3 ethoxy groups, sodium C10 to C15 alkyl benzene sulphonates and sodium C12 to C18 alkyl sulphates. Also applicable are surfactants such as those described in EP-A-328 177 (Unilever), which show resistance to salting-out, the alkyl polyglycoside surfactants described in EP-A-070 074, and alkyl monoglycosides. The chains of the surfactants may be branched or linear.
Soaps may also be present. The fatty acid soap used preferably contains from about 16 to about 22 carbon atoms, preferably in a straight chain configuration. The anionic contribution from soap is preferably from 0 to 30 wt % of the total anionic.
Preferably, at least 50 wt % of the anionic surfactant is selected from: sodium C11 to C15 alkyl benzene sulphonates; and, sodium C12 to C18 alkyl sulphates. Even more preferably, the anionic surfactant is sodium C11 to C15 alkyl benzene sulphonates.
Preferably the anionic surfactant is present in the coated laundry detergent particle at levels between 15 to 85 wt %, more preferably 50 to 80 wt % on total surfactant.
Nonionic Surfactants
Suitable nonionic detergent compounds which may be used include, in particular, the reaction products of compounds having a hydrophobic group and a reactive hydrogen atom, for example, aliphatic alcohols, acids, amides or alkyl phenols with alkylene oxides, especially ethylene oxide either alone or with propylene oxide. Preferred nonionic detergent compounds are C6 to C22 alkyl phenol-ethylene oxide condensates, generally 5 to 25 EO, i.e. 5 to 25 units of ethylene oxide per molecule, and the condensation products of aliphatic C8 to C18 primary or secondary linear or branched alcohols with ethylene oxide, generally 5 to 50 EO. Preferably, the non-ionic is 10 to 50 EO, more preferably 20 to 35 EO. Alkyl ethoxylates are particularly preferred.
Preferably the nonionic surfactant is present in the coated laundry detergent particle at levels between 5 to 75 wt % on total surfactant, more preferably 10 to 40 wt % on total surfactant.
Cationic surfactant may be present as minor ingredients at levels preferably between 0 to 5 wt % on total surfactant.
Preferably all the surfactants are mixed together before being dried. Conventional mixing equipment may be used. The surfactant core of the laundry detergent particle may be formed by extrusion or roller compaction and subsequently coated with an inorganic salt.
Calcium Tolerant Surfactant System
In another aspect the surfactant system used is calcium tolerant and this is a preferred aspect because this reduces the need for builder.
Surfactant blends that do not require builders to be present for effective detergency in hard water are preferred. Such blends are called calcium tolerant surfactant blends if they pass the test set out hereinafter. However, the invention may also be of use for washing with soft water, either naturally occurring or made using a water softener. In this case, calcium tolerance is no longer important and blends other than calcium tolerant ones may be used.
Calcium-tolerance of the surfactant blend is tested as follows:
The surfactant blend in question is prepared at a concentration of 0.7 g surfactant solids per liter of water containing sufficient calcium ions to give a French hardness of 40 (4×10−3 Molar Ca2+). Other hardness ion free electrolytes such as sodium chloride, sodium sulphate, and sodium hydroxide are added to the solution to adjust the ionic strength to 0.05M and the pH to 10. The adsorption of light of wavelength 540 nm through 4 mm of sample is measured 15 minutes after sample preparation. Ten measurements are made and an average value is calculated. Samples that give an absorption value of less than 0.08 are deemed to be calcium tolerant.
Examples of surfactant blends that satisfy the above test for calcium tolerance include those having a major part of LAS surfactant (which is not of itself calcium tolerant) blended with one or more other surfactants (co-surfactants) that are calcium tolerant to give a blend that is sufficiently calcium tolerant to be usable with little or no builder and to pass the given test. Suitable calcium tolerant co-surfactants include SLES 1-7EO, and alkyl-ethoxylate nonionic surfactants, particularly those with melting points less than 40° C.
A LAS/SLES surfactant blend has a superior foam profile to a LAS nonionic surfactant blend and is therefore preferred for hand washing formulations requiring high levels of foam. SLES may be used at levels of up to 30 wt % of the surfactant blend.
Water Soluble Inorganic Salts
The water-soluble inorganic salts are preferably selected from sodium carbonate, sodium chloride, sodium silicate and sodium sulphate, or mixtures thereof, most preferably, 70 to 100 wt % sodium carbonate on total water-soluble inorganic salts. The water-soluble inorganic salt is present as a coating on the particle. The water-soluble inorganic salt is preferably present at a level that reduces the stickiness of the laundry detergent particle to a point where the particles are free flowing.
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that while multiple layered coatings, of the same or different coating materials, could be applied, a single coating layer is preferred, for simplicity of operation, and to maximise the thickness of the coating. The amount of coating should lay in the range 1 to 40 wt % of the particle, preferably 20 to 40 wt %, more preferably 25 to 35 wt % for the best results in terms of anti-caking properties of the detergent particles.
The coating is preferably applied to the surface of the surfactant core, by deposition from an aqueous solution of the water soluble inorganic salt. In the alternative coating can be performed using a slurry. The aqueous solution preferably contains greater than 50 g/L, more preferably 200 g/L of the salt. An aqueous spray-on of the coating solution in a fluidised bed has been found to give good results and may also generate a slight rounding of the detergent particles during the fluidisation process. Drying and/or cooling may be needed to finish the process.
A preferred calcium tolerant coated laundry detergent particle comprises 15 to 100 wt % on surfactant of anionic surfactant of which 20 to 30 wt % on surfactant is sodium lauryl ether sulphate.
Dye
The dye is added to the surfactant mix in the core, preferably the dye is dissolved in the surfactant before the core is formed.
Dyes are described in Industrial Dyes edited by K. Hunger 2003 Wiley-VCH ISBN 3-527-30426-6.
Dyes for use in the current invention are selected from anionic and non-ionic dyes Anionic dyes are negatively charged in an aqueous medium at pH 7. Examples of anionic dyes are found in the classes of acid and direct dyes in the Color Index (Society of Dyers and Colourists and American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists). Anionic dyes preferably contain at least one sulphonate or carboxylate groups. Non-ionic dyes are uncharged in an aqueous medium at pH 7, examples are found in the class of disperse dyes in the Color Index.
The dyes may be alkoxylated. Alkoxylated dyes are preferably of the following generic form: Dye-NR1R2. The NR1R2 group is attached to an aromatic ring of the dye. R1 and R2 are independently selected from polyoxyalkylene chains having 2 or more repeating units and preferably having 2 to 20 repeating units. Examples of polyoxyalkylene chains include ethylene oxide, propylene oxide, glycidol oxide, butylene oxide and mixtures thereof.
A preferred polyoxyalkylene chain is [(CH2CR3HO)x(CH2CR4HO)yR5) in which x+y ≦5 wherein y≧1 and z=0 to 5, R3 is selected from: H; CH3; CH2O(CH2CH2O)zH and mixtures thereof; R4 is selected from: H; CH2O(CH2CH2O)zH and mixtures thereof; and, R5 is selected from: H; and, CH3.
A preferred alkoxylated dye for use in the invention is:
Preferably the dye is selected from acid dyes; disperse dyes and alkoxylated dyes.
Most preferably the dye is a non-ionic dye.
Preferably the dye is selected from those having: anthraquinone; mono-azo; bis-azo; xanthene; phthalocyanine; and, phenazine chromophores. More preferably the dye is selected from those having: anthraquinone and, mono-azo chromophores.
The dye is added to the coating slurry and agitated before applying to the core of the particle. Application may be by any suitable method, preferably spraying on to the core particle as detailed above.
The dye may be any colour, preferable the dye is blue, violet, green or red. Most preferably the dye is blue or violet.
Preferably the dye is selected from: acid blue 80, acid blue 62, acid violet 43, acid green 25, direct blue 86, acid blue 59, acid blue 98, direct violet 9, direct violet 99, direct violet 35, direct violet 51, acid violet 50, acid yellow 3, acid red 94, acid red 51, acid red 95, acid red 92, acid red 98, acid red 87, acid yellow 73, acid red 50, acid violet 9, acid red 52, food black 1, food black 2, acid red 163, acid black 1, acid orange 24, acid yellow 23, acid yellow 40, acid yellow 11, acid red 180, acid red 155, acid red 1, acid red 33, acid red 41, acid red 19, acid orange 10, acid red 27, acid red 26, acid orange 20, acid orange 6, sulphonated Al and Zn phthalocyanines, solvent violet 13, disperse violet 26, disperse violet 28, solvent green 3, solvent blue 63, disperse blue 56, disperse violet 27, solvent yellow 33, disperse blue 79:1.
The dye is preferably a shading dye for imparting a perception of whiteness to a laundry textile, preferably acid violet 50, solvent violet 13, disperse violet 27, disperse violet 28, an alkoxylated thiophene, or a cationic phenazine as described in WO 2009/141172 and WO 2009/141173. When a shading dye is present, preferably a further green dye is present to shift the colour of the particle from violet to blue-green.
The dye may be covalently bound to polymeric species.
A combination of dyes may be used.
If the dye is added to the core precursor in a solution/slurry that reduces the viscosity of the core precursor such that forming of the core is not optimal then excess solution, e.g., water, is removed, for example, by a white film evaporator.
The Coated Detergent Particle
Preferably, the coated detergent particle comprises from 10 to 100 wt %, more preferably 50 to 100 wt %, even more preferably 80 to 100 wt %, most preferably 90 to 100 wt % of a detergent formulation in a package.
The package is that of a commercial formulation for sale to the general public and is preferably in the range of 0.01 kg to 5 kg, preferably 0.02 kg to 2 kg, most preferably 0.5 kg to 2 kg.
Preferably, the coated detergent particle is such that at least 90 to 100% of the coated detergent particles in the in the x, y and z dimensions are within a 20%, preferably 10%, variable from the largest to the smallest coated detergent particle.
Water Content
The particle preferably comprises from 0 to 15 wt % water, more preferably 0 to 10 wt %, most preferably from 1 to 5 wt % water, at 293K and 50% relative humidity. This facilitates the storage stability of the particle and its mechanical properties.
Other Adjuncts
The adjuncts as described below may be present in the coating or the core. These may be in the core or the coating.
Fluorescent Agent
The coated detergent particle preferably comprises a fluorescent agent (optical brightener). Fluorescent agents are well known and many such fluorescent agents are available commercially. Usually, these fluorescent agents are supplied and used in the form of their alkali metal salts, for example, the sodium salts. The total amount of the fluorescent agent or agents used in the composition is generally from 0.005 to 2 wt %, more preferably 0.01 to 0.1 wt %. Suitable Fluorescer for use in the invention are described in chapter 7 of Industrial Dyes edited by K. Hunger 2003 Wiley-VCH ISBN 3-527-30426-6.
Preferred fluorescers are selected from the classes distyrylbiphenyls, triazinylaminostilbenes, bis(1,2,3-triazol-2-Astilbenes, bis(benzo[b]furan-2-yl)biphenyls, 1,3-diphenyl-2-pyrazolines and courmarins. The fluorescer is preferably sulfonated.
Preferred classes of fluorescer are: Di-styryl biphenyl compounds, e.g. Tinopal (Trade Mark) CBS-X, Di-amine stilbene di-sulphonic acid compounds, e.g. Tinopal DMS pure Xtra and Blankophor (Trade Mark) HRH, and Pyrazoline compounds, e.g. Blankophor SN. Preferred fluorescers are: sodium 2 (4-styryl-3-sulfophenyl)-2H-napthol[1,2-d]triazole, disodium 4,4′-bis{[(4-anilino-6-(N methyl-N-2 hydroxyethyl)amino 1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)]amino}stilbene-2-2′disulfonate, disodium 4,4′-bis{[(4-anilino-6-morpholino-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)]amino}stilbene-2-2′disulfonate, and disodium 4,4′-bis(2-sulfostyryl)biphenyl.
Tinopal® DMS is the disodium salt of disodium 4,4′-bis{[(4-anilino-6-morpholino-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)]amino}stilbene-2-2′disulfonate. Tinopal® CBS is the disodium salt of disodium 4,4′-bis(2-sulfostyryl)biphenyl.
Perfume
Preferably the composition comprises a perfume. The perfume is preferably in the range from 0.001 to 3 wt %, most preferably 0.1 to 1 wt %. Many suitable examples of perfumes are provided in the CTFA (Cosmetic, Toiletry and Fragrance Association) 1992 International Buyers Guide, published by CFTA Publications and OPD 1993 Chemicals Buyers Directory 80th Annual Edition, published by Schnell Publishing Co.
It is commonplace for a plurality of perfume components to be present in a formulation. In the compositions of the present invention it is envisaged that there will be four or more, preferably five or more, more preferably six or more or even seven or more different perfume components.
In perfume mixtures preferably 15 to 25 wt % are top notes. Top notes are defined by Poucher (Journal of the Society of Cosmetic Chemists 6(2):80 [1955]). Preferred top-notes are selected from citrus oils, linalool, linalyl acetate, lavender, dihydromyrcenol, rose oxide and cis-3-hexanol.
It is preferred that the coated detergent particle does not contain a peroxygen bleach, e.g., sodium percarbonate, sodium perborate, and peracid.
Polymers
The composition may comprise one or more further polymers. Examples are carboxymethylcellulose, poly(ethylene glycol), poly(vinyl alcohol), polyethylene imines, ethoxylated polyethylene imines, water soluble polyester polymers polycarboxylates such as polyacrylates, maleic/acrylic acid copolymers and lauryl methacrylate/acrylic acid copolymers.
Enzymes
One or more enzymes are preferred present in a composition of the invention.
Preferably the level of each enzyme is from 0.0001 wt % to 0.5 wt % protein on product.
Especially contemplated enzymes include proteases, alpha-amylases, cellulases, lipases, peroxidases/oxidases, pectate lyases, and mannanases, or mixtures thereof.
Suitable lipases include those of bacterial or fungal origin. Chemically modified or protein engineered mutants are included. Examples of useful lipases include lipases from Humicola (synonym Thermomyces), e.g. from H. lanuginosa (T. lanuginosus) as described in EP 258 068 and EP 305 216 or from H. insolens as described in WO 96/13580, a Pseudomonas lipase, e.g. from P. alcaligenes or P. pseudoalcaligenes (EP 218 272), P. cepacia (EP 331 376), P. stutzeri (GB 1,372,034), P. fluorescens, Pseudomonas sp. strain SD 705 (WO 95/06720 and WO 96/27002), P. wisconsinensis (WO 96/12012), a Bacillus lipase, e.g. from B. subtilis (Dartois et al. (1993), Biochemica et Biophysica Acta, 1131, 253-360), B. stearothermophilus (JP 64/744992) or B. pumilus (WO 91/16422).
Other examples are lipase variants such as those described in WO 92/05249, WO 94/01541, EP 407 225, EP 260 105, WO 95/35381, WO 96/00292, WO 95/30744, WO 94/25578, WO 95/14783, WO 95/22615, WO 97/04079 and WO 97/07202, WO 00/60063, WO 09/107,091 and WO09/111,258.
Preferred commercially available lipase enzymes include Lipolase™ and Lipolase Ultra™, Lipex™ (Novozymes A/S) and Lipoclean™.
The method of the invention may be carried out in the presence of phospholipase classified as EC 3.1.1.4 and/or EC 3.1.1.32. As used herein, the term phospholipase is an enzyme which has activity towards phospholipids.
Phospholipids, such as lecithin or phosphatidylcholine, consist of glycerol esterified with two fatty acids in an outer (sn-1) and the middle (sn-2) positions and esterified with phosphoric acid in the third position; the phosphoric acid, in turn, may be esterified to an amino-alcohol. Phospholipases are enzymes which participate in the hydrolysis of phospholipids. Several types of phospholipase activity can be distinguished, including phospholipases A1 and A2 which hydrolyze one fatty acyl group (in the sn-1 and sn-2 position, respectively) to form lysophospholipid; and lysophospholipase (or phospholipase B) which can hydrolyze the remaining fatty acyl group in lysophospholipid. Phospholipase C and phospholipase D (phosphodiesterases) release diacyl glycerol or phosphatidic acid respectively.
Suitable proteases include those of animal, vegetable or microbial origin. Microbial origin is preferred. Chemically modified or protein engineered mutants are included. The protease may be a serine protease or a metallo protease, preferably an alkaline microbial protease or a trypsin-like protease. Preferred commercially available protease enzymes include Alcalase™, Savinase™, Primase™, Duralase™, Dyrazym™, Esperase™, Everlase™, Polarzyme™, and Kannase™, (Novozymes A/S), Maxatase™, Maxacal™, Maxapem™, Properase™, Purafect™, Purafect OxP™, FN2™, and FN3™ (Genencor International Inc.). The method of the invention may be carried out in the presence of cutinase. classified in EC 3.1.1.74. The cutinase used according to the invention may be of any origin. Preferably cutinases are of microbial origin, in particular of bacterial, of fungal or of yeast origin.
Suitable amylases (alpha and/or beta) include those of bacterial or fungal origin. Chemically modified or protein engineered mutants are included. Amylases include, for example, alpha-amylases obtained from Bacillus, e.g. a special strain of B. licheniformis, described in more detail in GB 1,296,839, or the Bacillus sp. strains disclosed in WO 95/026397 or WO 00/060060. Commercially available amylases are Duramyl™, Termamyl™, Termamyl Ultra™, Natalase™, Stainzyme™, Fungamyl™ and BAN™ (Novozymes A/S), Rapidase™ and Purastar™ (from Genencor International Inc.).
Suitable cellulases include those of bacterial or fungal origin. Chemically modified or protein engineered mutants are included. Suitable cellulases include cellulases from the genera Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Humicola, Fusarium, Thielavia, Acremonium, e.g. the fungal cellulases produced from Humicola insolens, Thielavia terrestris, Myceliophthora thermophila, and Fusarium oxysporum disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,435,307, 5,648,263, 5,691,178, 5,776,757, WO 89/09259, WO 96/029397, and WO 98/012307. Commercially available cellulases include Celluzyme™, Carezyme™, Endolase™, Renozyme™ (Novozymes A/S), Clazinase™ and Puradax HA™ (Genencor International Inc.), and KAC-500(B)™ (Kao Corporation).
Suitable peroxidases/oxidases include those of plant, bacterial or fungal origin. Chemically modified or protein engineered mutants are included. Examples of useful peroxidases include peroxidases from Coprinus, e.g. from C. cinereus, and variants thereof as those described in WO 93/24618, WO 95/10602, and WO 98/15257. Commercially available peroxidases include Guardzyme™ and Novozym™ 51004 (Novozymes A/S).
Further enzymes suitable for use are disclosed in WO2009/087524, WO2009/090576, WO2009/148983 and WO2008/007318.
Enzyme Stabilizers
Any enzyme present in the composition may be stabilized using conventional stabilizing agents, e.g., a polyol such as propylene glycol or glycerol, a sugar or sugar alcohol, lactic acid, boric acid, or a boric acid derivative, e.g., an aromatic borate ester, or a phenyl boronic acid derivative such as 4-formylphenyl boronic acid, and the composition may be formulated as described in e.g. WO 92/19709 and WO 92/19708.
Where alkyl groups are sufficiently long to form branched or cyclic chains, the alkyl groups encompass branched, cyclic and linear alkyl chains. The alkyl groups are preferably linear or branched, most preferably linear.
The indefinite article “a” or “an” and its corresponding definite article “the” as used herein means at least one, or one or more, unless specified otherwise. The singular encompasses the plural unless otherwise specified.
Sequesterants may be present in the coated detergent particles.
It is preferred that the coated detergent particle has a core to shell ratio of from 3 to 1:1, most preferably 2.5 to 1.5:1; the optimal ratio of core to shell is 2:1.
LAS refers to linear alkyl benzene sulphonate. PAS refers to primary alkyl sulphate. NI refers to an ethoylated alcohol non-ionic surfactant having an average of 30 ethoylated units and an alkyl chain of C12-14. Specifically the following were used: LAS—UFASAN 65 ex Unger, PAS—Stepanol CFAS70 ex Stepan and NI—Leutensol AO 30 ex BASF.
A coated detergent particle colour were created containing Acid Violet 50 in the core.:
The particles were oblate elipisoids which had the following dimensions x=1.1 mm y=4.0 mm z=5.0 mm. The particles weighed ˜0.013 g each. The Particle appeared a gorgeous violet to the eye.
Preparation of Core
1962.5 g of dried, milled surfactant blend (LAS/PAS/NI 68/17/15 by weight) was thoroughly mixed with 37.38 g of perfume oil and 0.124 g of Acid Violet 50 dye. The mixture was then extruded using a ThermoFisher 24HC twin screw extruder, operated at a rate of 8 kg/hr. Inlet temperature of the extruder was set at 20° C., rising to 40° C. just prior to the die-plate. The die-plate used was drilled with 6 circular orifices of 5 mm diameter.
The extruded product was cut after the die-plate using a high speed cutter set up to produce particle with a thickness of ˜1.1 mm.
Coating of Particle
764 g of the extrudates above were charged to the fluidising chamber of a Strea 1 laboratory fluid bed drier (Aeromatic-Fielder AG) and spray coated using 1069 g of a solution containing 320.7 g of sodium carbonate in 748.3 g of water, using a top-spray configuration.
The coating solution was fed to the spray nozzle of the Strea 1 via a peristaltic pump (Watson-Marlow model 101 U/R) at an initial rate of 3.3 g/min, rising to 9.1 g/min during the course of the coating trial.
The Fluid bed coater was operated with an initial air inlet air temperature of 55° C. increasing to 90° C. during the course of the coating trial whilst maintaining the outlet temperature in the range 45-50° C. throughout the coating process.
The colour of the particles of example 1 was measured using a reflectometer (UV-excluded) and expressed as the CIE L*a*b* value. The results are shown below
The particle is clearly violet with a negative b* value.
2.25 g of the Particle of example were dissolved in 100 ml of deminerailised water. The solutions were centrifuged at 15 minutes for 11000 RPM and the colour of the liquid measured on A UV-VIS absorption spectrometer. The liquid appeared violet to the eye.
The UV-VIS spectrum gave the spectrum of Acid Violet 50 for both solutions with a maximum absorption at 570 nm. The optical densities are given in the table below:
Both particles effectively deliver Acid Violet 50 to solution.
25 of each particle were scattered on to a 20 by 20 cm piece of white woven cotton which was submerged in 500 ml of demineralised water such that the cloth were covered by 2 cm of water. The particles were left for 40 minutes then the cloth washed, rinsed and dried. The number of stains on each cloth was counted and the % staining calculated. % staining is the fraction of particles that give rise to stains:
% staining=100×(number of stains)/(number of particles)
The results are given in the table below:
Surprisingly the particles show very low staining.
A coated detergent particle colour were created containing Acid Violet 50 in the core.:
The particles were oblate elipisoids which had the following dimensions x=1.1 mm y=4.0 mm z=5.0 mm. The particles weighed ˜0.013 g each.
Preparation of Core
2000 g of dried, milled surfactant blend (LAS/PAS/NI 68/17/15 by weight) was thoroughly mixed with 0.124 g of Acid Violet 50 dye. The mixture was then extruded using a ThermoFisher 24HC twin screw extruder, operated at a rate of 8 kg/hr. Inlet temperature of the extruder was set at 20° C., rising to 40° C. just prior to the die-plate. The die-plate used was drilled with 6 circular orifices of 5 mm diameter.
The extruded product was cut after the die-plate using a high speed cutter set up to produce particle with a thickness of ˜1.1 mm.
Coating of Particle
764 g of the extrudates above were charged to the fluidising chamber of a Strea 1 laboratory fluid bed drier (Aeromatic-Fielder AG) and spray coated using 1069 g of a solution containing 320.7 g of sodium carbonate in 748.3 g of water, using a top-spray configuration.
The coating solution was fed to the spray nozzle of the Strea 1 via a peristaltic pump (Watson-Marlow model 101 U/R) at an initial rate of 3.3 g/min, rising to 9.1 g/min during the course of the coating trial.
The Fluid bed coater was operated with an initial air inlet air temperature of 55° C. increasing to 90° C. during the course of the coating trial whilst maintaining the outlet temperature in the range 45-50° C. throughout the coating process.
2.04 g of the Particle of example were dissolved in 100 ml of deminerailised water. The solutions were centrifuged at 15 minutes for 11000 RPM and the colour of the liquid measured on A UV-VIS absorption spectrometer. The liquid appeared violet to the eye.
The UV-VIS spectrum gave the spectrum of Acid Violet 50 for both solutions with a maximum absorption at 570 nm. The optical densities are given in the table below
The particles effectively deliver Acid Violet 50 to solution.
25 of each particle were scattered on to a 20 by 20 cm piece of white woven cotton which was submerged in 500 ml of demineralised water such that the cloth were covered by 2 cm of water. The particles were left for 40 minutes then the cloth washed, rinsed and dried. The number of spots on each cloth was counted and the % spotting calculated. % spotting is the fraction of particles that give rise to spots:
% spotting=100×(number of spots)/(number of particles)
The results are given in the table below:
Surprisingly the particles show very low spotting. The particles did not contain perfume.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10187513 | Oct 2010 | EP | regional |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2011/065153 | 9/1/2011 | WO | 00 | 7/12/2013 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2012/048950 | 4/19/2012 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2480579 | Holuba | Aug 1949 | A |
| 3887614 | Susuki et al. | Jun 1975 | A |
| 3989635 | Toyoda | Nov 1976 | A |
| 4097418 | Rolfes | Jun 1978 | A |
| 4269722 | Joshi et al. | May 1981 | A |
| 4308625 | Kitto | Jan 1982 | A |
| 4664817 | Wixon | May 1987 | A |
| 4965015 | Heybourne et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
| 5002681 | Wierenga et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5332518 | Kuroda et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 6114297 | Yamaguchi et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6159920 | Ridyard | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6284722 | Yamaguchi et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6472362 | Appel et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6521583 | James et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6579838 | Housmekerides et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6596683 | Ebihara | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6653269 | Housmekerides et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6730652 | Painter et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6747000 | Pearce et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6846795 | Lant et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6858572 | Mort, III | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 7022660 | Mort et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
| 7166567 | Schudel et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 8883702 | Bonsall et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 20010053757 | Mendez Mata et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020198133 | Behler et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20040198629 | Raehse | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040235704 | Wasserman | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20050227890 | Van Dijk et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20060019860 | Cardozo | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060160717 | Itakura et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20070249513 | Mort et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20080234168 | Hamelin et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20090054292 | Menge et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20100069282 | Prabhat et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100069283 | Prabhat et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1122361 | May 1996 | CN |
| 1149885 | May 1997 | CN |
| 1245529 | Feb 2000 | CN |
| 1256710 | Jun 2000 | CN |
| 1276828 | Dec 2000 | CN |
| 1311755 | Sep 2001 | CN |
| 1474657 | Feb 2004 | CN |
| 1912088 | Feb 2007 | CN |
| 1916148 | Feb 2007 | CN |
| 101213286 | Jul 2008 | CN |
| 101370418 | Feb 2009 | CN |
| 4220649 | Jan 1994 | DE |
| 4313137 | Oct 1994 | DE |
| 19954959 | May 2001 | DE |
| 202004006632 | Oct 2004 | DE |
| 102006034900 | Jan 2008 | DE |
| 102006034900 | Jan 2008 | DE |
| 102008010085 | Aug 2009 | DE |
| 0057611 | Aug 1982 | EP |
| 0388389 | Sep 1990 | EP |
| 0391087 | Oct 1990 | EP |
| 0567140 | Oct 1993 | EP |
| 0846755 | Jun 1998 | EP |
| 0877079 | Nov 1998 | EP |
| 0903405 | Mar 1999 | EP |
| 0962424 | Dec 1999 | EP |
| 1081219 | Mar 2001 | EP |
| 2166077 | Mar 2010 | EP |
| 688752 | Mar 1953 | GB |
| 2076011 | Nov 1981 | GB |
| 06-087742 | Nov 1994 | JP |
| WO9325729 | Dec 1993 | WO |
| WO9528462 | Oct 1995 | WO |
| WO9842818 | Oct 1998 | WO |
| WO9932599 | Jul 1999 | WO |
| WO0053719 | Sep 2000 | WO |
| WO0078912 | Dec 2000 | WO |
| WO2004022693 | Mar 2004 | WO |
| WO 2006032327 | Mar 2006 | WO |
| 2008090091 | Jul 2008 | WO |
| WO2010069957 | Jun 2010 | WO |
| WO2010084039 | Jul 2010 | WO |
| WO2010122050 | Oct 2010 | WO |
| WO2010122051 | Oct 2010 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| PCT International Search Report in PCT application PCT/EP2011/065153 dated Dec. 5, 2011 with Written Opinion. |
| European Search Report in EP application EP 10 18 7513 dated Mar. 16, 2011. |
| PCT International Search Report in PCT application PCT/EP2011/065154 dated Dec. 16, 2011 with Written Opinion. |
| European Search Report in EP application EP 10 18 7514 dated Mar. 23, 2011. |
| Co-pending Application: Applicant: Batchelor et al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/878,451, filed Jul. 12, 2013. |
| PCT International Search Report in PCT application: PCT/EP2011/057309 dated Jul. 15, 2011 with Written Opinion. |
| European Search Report in EP application EP 10 18 7506 dated Mar. 16, 2011. |
| Co-pending Application: Applicant: Bonsall et al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/878,456, filed Jul. 8, 2013. |
| PCT International Search Report in PCT application PCT/EP2011/057310 dated Sep. 14, 2011 with Written Opinion. |
| Co-pending Application: Applicant: Bonsall et al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/878,459, filed Apr. 9, 2013. |
| PCT International Search Report in PCT application PCT/EP2011/063748 dated Nov. 9, 2011 with Written Opinion. |
| European Search Report in EP application EP 10 18 7494 dated Mar. 4, 2011. |
| Co-pending Application: Batchelor et al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/878,440, filed Jul. 18, 2013. |
| PCT International Search Report in PCT application PCT/EP2011/065149 dated Dec. 20, 2011 with Written Opinion. |
| European Search Report in EP application EP 10 18 7509 dated Mar. 16, 2011. |
| Co-pending Application: Applicant: Batchelor et al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/878,442, filed Jul. 12, 2013. |
| PCT International Search Report in PCT application PCT/EP2011/065124 dated Jan. 20, 2012 with Written Opinion. |
| European Search Report in EP application EP 10 18 7495 dated Mar. 8, 2011. |
| Co-pending Application: Applicant: Keningley et al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/878,444, filed Jul. 9, 2013. |
| PCT International Search Report in PCT application PCT/EP2011/065150 dated Dec. 16, 2011 with Written Opinion. |
| European Search Report in EP application EP 10 18 7511 dated Mar. 21, 2011. |
| Co-pending Application: Applicant: Batchelor et al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/878,447, filed Jul. 12, 2013. |
| PCT International Search Report in PCT application PCT/EP2011/065152 dated Dec. 15, 2011 with Written Opinion. |
| European Search Report in EP application EP 10 18 7512 dated Mar. 23, 2011. |
| Co-pending Application: Applicant: Batchelor et al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/878,448, filed Jul. 8, 2013. |
| PCT International Search Report in PCT application PCT/EP2011/067735 dated Jan. 23, 2012 with Written Opinion. |
| European Search Report in EP application EP 10 18 7520 dated Mar. 7, 2011. |
| PCT International Search Report in PCT application PCT/EP2011/067159 dated Jan. 25, 2012 with Written Opinion. |
| European Search Report in EP application EP 10 18 7500 dated Mar. 28, 2011. |
| Nelen, Bianca A. P., “Sucrose Esters”, Emulsifiers in Food Technology, (2004), p. 131-161, Chapter 6, Blackwell Publishing Ltd. |
| W. Herbst and k. Hunger, “Industrial Organic Pigments, Production, Properties, Applications”, Dec. (1992), Index. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20130281350 A1 | Oct 2013 | US |
