A bidirectional bipolar junction transistor (hereafter B-TRAN) is junction transistor constructed with a base and collector-emitter on a first side of the bulk region, and a distinct and separate base and collector-emitter on a second side of the bulk region opposite the first side. When properly configured by an external driver, electrical current may selectively flow through a B-TRAN in either direction, and thus B-TRAN devices are considered bidirectional devices. Based on the bi-directionality, whether a collector-emitter is considered a collector (e.g., current flow into the B-TRAN) or an emitter (e.g., current flow out of the B-TRAN) depends on the applied external voltage and thus the direction of current flow through the B-TRAN.
For NPN-type devices, the collector-emitter region on each side of the semiconductor substrate can be considered to form a PN junction with the bulk region. One manufacturing performance test is to determine the reverse-bias breakdown voltage of the PN junction on each side of the semiconductor substrate. If the reverse breakdown voltage of the PN junction is too low, the overall performance of the B-TRAN may be degraded.
One example is a semiconductor device comprising: an emitter region defining an inner boundary in the shape of an obround with parallel sides, and the obround having a first hemispherical end and a second hemispherical end each having a radius; a base region having a first end, a second end opposite the first end, and base length, the base region disposed within the obround with the base length parallel to and centered between the parallel sides, the first end spaced apart from the first hemispherical end by a first gap greater than the radius by more than a manufacturing tolerance, and the second end spaced apart from the second hemispherical end by a second gap greater than the radius by more than the manufacturing tolerance.
In the example semiconductor device, the first gap may be at least fifty percent (50%) longer than the radius. In the example semiconductor device, the first gap may be is at least one hundred percent (100%) longer than the radius.
The example semiconductor device may further comprise: a base contact electrically coupled to the base region through a base window through a dielectric, the base contact defines a length parallel to the base length, and a first terminus being a closest terminus to the first end, the first terminus spaced apart from the first end by a setback distance being at least equal to the radius. The setback distance may be at least fifty percent (50%) longer than the radius. The setback distance may be at least one hundred percent (100%) longer than the radius.
The example semiconductor device may further comprise a lower side comprising an emitter region and a base region, and the semiconductor device may define a bidirectional double-base bipolar junction transistor.
In the example semiconductor device the base region may be P-type, and the emitter region may be N-type.
The example semiconductor device may further comprise a trench of dielectric material surrounding the base region. The trench may have a depth of 10 microns to 15 microns, inclusive, and a width of 3 microns to 5 microns, inclusive.
A second example semiconductor device may comprise: an emitter region defining an inner boundary in the shape of an obround with parallel sides, and the obround having first and second hemispherical ends each having a radius; a base region having a first end, a second end opposite the first end, and base length, the base region disposed within the obround with the base length parallel to and centered between the parallel sides, the first end spaced apart from the first hemispherical end by a first gap, and the second end spaced apart from the second hemispherical end by a second gap; a base contact electrically coupled to the base region, the base contact defines a length parallel to the base length, and a first terminus being a closest terminus to the first end, the first terminus spaced apart from the first end by a setback distance being at least equal to the radius.
In the second example semiconductor device, the setback distance may be at least fifty percent (50%) longer than the radius. In the second example semiconductor device, the setback distance may be is at least one hundred percent (100%) longer than the radius.
In the second example semiconductor device, the first gap may be greater than the radius by more than a manufacturing tolerance, and the second gap greater than the radius by more than a manufacturing tolerance. The first gap may be at least fifty percent (50%) longer than the radius. Alternatively, the first gap may be at least one hundred percent (100%) longer than the radius.
The second example semiconductor device may further comprise a lower side comprising an emitter region and a base region, and the semiconductor device may define a bidirectional double-base bipolar junction transistor.
In the second example semiconductor device, the base region may be P-type, and the emitter region may be N-type.
The second example semiconductor device may further comprise a trench of dielectric material surrounding the base region. The trench may have a depth of 10 microns to 15 microns, inclusive, and a width of 3 microns to 5 microns, inclusive.
For a detailed description of example embodiments, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings in which:
Various terms are used to refer to particular system components. Different companies may refer to a component by different names—this document does not intend to distinguish between components that differ in name but not function. In the following discussion and in the claims, the terms “including” and “comprising” are used in an open-ended fashion, and thus should be interpreted to mean “including, but not limited to . . . ” Also, the term “couple” or “couples” is intended to mean either an indirect or direct connection. Thus, if a first device couples to a second device, that connection may be through a direct connection or through an indirect connection via other devices and connections.
“About” in reference to a recited parameter shall mean the recited parameter plus or minus ten percent (+/−10%) of the recited parameter.
“Bidirectional double-base bipolar junction transistor” shall mean a junction transistor having a base and a collector-emitter on a first face or first side of a bulk region, and having a base and a collector-emitter on a second face or second side of the bulk region. The base and the collector-emitter on the first side are distinct from the base and the collector-emitter on the second side. An outward pointing vector normal to the first side points an opposite direction to an outward pointing vector normal to the second side.
“Upper base” shall mean a base of a bidirectional double-base bipolar junction transistor on a first side of a bulk region of the transistor, and shall not be read to imply a location of the base with respect to gravity.
“Lower base” shall mean a base of a bidirectional double-base bipolar junction transistor on a second side of a bulk region of the transistor opposite a first side, and shall not be read to imply a location of the base with respect to gravity.
“Upper collector-emitter” shall mean a collector-emitter of a bidirectional double-base bipolar junction transistor on a first side of a bulk region of the transistor, and shall not be read to imply a location of the collector-emitter with respect to gravity.
“Lower collector-emitter” shall mean a collector-emitter of a bidirectional double-base bipolar junction transistor on a second side of a bulk region of the transistor opposite a first side, and shall not be read to imply a location of the collector-emitter with respect to gravity.
The following discussion is directed to various embodiments of the invention. Although one or more of these embodiments may be preferred, the embodiments disclosed should not be interpreted, or otherwise used, as limiting the scope of the disclosure, including the claims. In addition, one skilled in the art will understand that the following description has broad application, and the discussion of any embodiment is meant only to be exemplary of that embodiment, and not intended to intimate that the scope of the disclosure, including the claims, is limited to that embodiment.
Various examples are directed to a layout to reduce current crowding at endpoints of structures within semiconductor device, such as bidirectional double-base bipolar junction transistors (B-TRANs). In particular, in example systems each emitter region defines an emitter area with an inner boundary in the shape of an obround having straight sides and hemispherical ends. A base region is disposed within the obround, the base region having a base length and on opposite ends. In example systems, the ends of the base region each have an offset or gap from the respective hemispherical ends by a distance greater than the radius of the hemispherical ends. The gap reduces current crowding at the ends of the base region, which reduced current crowding results lower electric fields at the ends of the base region and thus greater reverse-bias breakdown voltage of the junction formed between the base and the emitter. The specification first turns to an example B-TRAN device to orient the reader.
The upper side 102 includes collector-emitter regions 106 which form a junction with the drift region or bulk substrate 108. The upper side 102 further defines a base region 110 disposed between the collector-emitter regions 106. The collector-emitter regions 106 are electrically coupled to collector-emitter contacts 112, such as a metallic material applied through windows in an insulation material (not specifically shown) covering the upper side 102. Similarly, the base region 110 is electrically coupled to a base contact 114, such as a metallic material applied through a window in the insulation material (not specifically shown) covering the upper side 102. In the view of
Similarly, the lower side 104 includes collector-emitter regions 120 which form a junction with the bulk substrate 108, and collector-emitter contacts 122 that electrically couple to the collector-emitter regions 120. The collector-emitter contacts 122 are coupled together to form the lower collector-emitter 124. The lower side 104 includes the base region 126 and a base contact 128 that electrically couples to the base region 126. The base contacts 128 are coupled together to form a lower base 130.
The example B-TRAN 100 is an NPN structure, which means the collector-emitter regions 106 and 120 are N-type, the base regions 110 and 126 are P-type, and the bulk substrate 108 is P-type. Note that PNP-type B-TRAN devices are also contemplated; however, so as not to unduly lengthen the discussion a PNP-type B-TRAN device is not specifically shown.
In example cases, the various structures and doping associated with the upper side 102 are meant to be mirror images of the various structures and doping associated with the lower side 104. However, in some cases the various structures and doping associated with the upper side 102 are constructed at different times than the various structures and doping on the lower side 104, and thus there may be slight differences in the structures and doping as between the two sides. It follows that the differences may be attributable to variation within manufacturing tolerances, but such does not adversely affect the operation of the device as a bidirectional double-base bipolar junction transistor.
It turns out, however, that devices constructed with the layout as shown in
The inventors of the current specification found that the lower than expected reverse-bias breakdown voltage and corresponding increase reverse-bias leakage current is attributable, at least in part, to the layout as between the emitter region 200 and the base region 204. In particular, the inventors of the current specification found that implementing the same separation S at the ends of the base regions 204 (such as at location 206) as implemented along the long dimension of the base region 204 results in increased electrical field strength compared to the straight areas, such as at location 208. Stated otherwise, the uniform spacing S between base region 204 and the emitter region 200 causes current bunching at the ends, such as location 206. The increased electric field strength attributable to the layout results in breakdown at lower than expected reverse-bias voltages. That is, for a particular applied voltage on the base region 204, the electric field strength at the location 206 will be higher than the electrical field strength along the straight portions, such as at location 208. The result is a reverse-bias breakdown voltage lower than desired (e.g., breakdown at 30-40V rather than a designed 60-90V).
In particular, visible in
In accordance with various examples, the first end 316 is spaced apart from the hemispherical end 308 by a first gap G1 greater than the radius of curvature 314. Similarly, the second end 318 is spaced apart from the hemispherical end 310 by a second gap G2 greater than the radius of curvature 314. In some cases, the gaps G1 and G2 are about the same. Stated otherwise, in example cases the layout of the base region 110 is designed and constructed such that the ends 316 and 318 each have an interstice or gap greater than the radius of curvature that defines the hemispherical ends 308 and 310, respectively, and that gap is greater than the radius of curvature by more than a manufacturing tolerance for the device (e.g., greater than 1 micron). Assuming all the radii of curvature are the same length (not strictly required), and further assuming all the gaps are the same length (not strictly required), the gap may be at least 50% longer than the radius of curvature (e.g., gap=radius×1.5), in some cases 100% longer than the radius of curvature (e.g., gap=radius×2.0).
By using a gap greater than the radius of curvature of an associated hemispherical end, the electric field strength may be lower compared to having the gap being about equal to the radius of curvature. Moreover, lower electric field strength at the ends of the base region 110 (e.g., one micron beyond the boundary of the base region 110) may make the electric field strength about the same as the electric field strength along the straight sides of the outer boundary 320 of the base region 110. Lower electric field strength reduces the chances of breakdown starting at the ends of the base region 110, and reduces leakage current.
In some examples, addressing reverse-bias breakdown voltage using gaps alone may be sufficient. However, the inventors of the specification believe further factors may also contribute to less than expected reverse-bias breakdown—such as placement of the metallic contact associated with the example base region 110.
The inventors of the current specification believe that having the end of the base contact 400 being very close, if not coextensive, with the end of the base region 204 may contribute to the less than expected reverse-bias breakdown voltage. In particular, with the base contact 400 electrically coupled to the base region 204, charge carriers (e.g., electrons) injected into the base region 204 experience no appreciable voltage drop as the charge carriers propagate to the ends of the base region 204. The higher the voltage at the ends of the base region 204, the greater the electric field associated with current crowding at the ends of the base region. Moreover, the charge carriers in the metallic base contact 400 also create electric field with respect to the hemispherical portion of the emitter region 200, and while those charge carriers may not directly traverse the depletion region around the base region 204, the additional electric field may hasten the breakdown within the depletion region between the base region 204 and the emitter region 200.
In particular, visible in
Further visible in
In the example layout, the first terminus 500 is spaced apart from the first end 316 by a setback distance SD measured along the long dimension of the base region 110, and in some examples the setback distance SD is at least equal to the radius of curvature 314. Assuming all the radii of curvature are the same length (not strictly required), and further assuming all the setback distances are the same length (not strictly required), the setback distance SD for each base contact 114 may be at least fifty percent (50%) longer than the radius of curvature (e.g., setback=radius×1.5), in some cases one hundred percent (100%) longer than the radius of curvature (e.g., setback=radius×2.0). Stated differently, measured parallel the long dimension of the base region, the sum of the gap G1 and setback distance SD may be at least 2.5 times the length of the radius of curvature 314.
By using a setback distance SD greater than the radius of curvature of an associated hemispherical end, the electric field strength may be lower compared to having base contact 114 being coextensive with base region 110. One possible explanation, and other explanations are possible, is that by having the base contact 114 with the setback distance SD as shown, the charge carriers (e.g., electrons) injected into the base region 110 by way of the base contact 114 experience a non-trivial voltage drop when propagating through the base region 110 toward the first end 316. The non-trivial voltage drop thus lowers the voltage at the first end 316, and consequently lowers the electrical field strength at the example first end 316 of the base region 110 (e.g., one micro-meter beyond the boundary of the base region 110). Moreover, the setback distance SD lowers any electric field contribution from charge carriers in the base contact 114 itself. Lower electric field strength reduces the chances of breakdown starting at the ends of the base region 110, and also reduced leakage current.
The various embodiments discussed to this point have assumed that, on each side of the device, the volume between the base regions and the collector-emitter regions comprises solely the P-type bulk substrate. However, in other cases additional structures may be present.
Similarly, the base region 110 is electrically coupled to the base contact 114. In the view of
Similarly, the lower side 104 includes collector-emitter regions 120 which form a junction with the bulk substrate 108, and collector-emitter contacts 122 that electrically couple to the collector-emitter regions 120. The collector-emitter contacts 122 are coupled together to form the lower collector-emitter 124. The lower side 104 includes the base region 126 and the base contact 128 that electrically couples to the base region 126. The base contacts 128 are coupled together to form a lower base 130. As with
Still referring to
Similarly for the lower side 104, the example B-TRAN 100 comprises the additional structures between the base regions and the collector-emitter regions. In the example, trenches 702 reside between the base region 126 and the surrounding collector-emitter regions 120. As with upper side 102, the trenches 702 may have a depth of between and including 10 microns and 15 microns, and a width of between and including 3 microns and 5 microns. The example trenches are filled with a dielectric material (e.g., oxide) which electrically insulates the base regions 126 from the collector-emitter regions 120. The trenches 702 may be used together with the gaps and setbacks discussed above to improve or increase the reverse-bias breakdown voltage of the example B-TRAN 100 and reduces leakage current.
In the example cross-sectional view of
The above discussion is meant to be illustrative of the principles and various embodiments of the present invention. Numerous variations and modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art once the above disclosure is fully appreciated. For example, the various structures can be implemented for any semiconductor device with interdigitated structure. It is intended that the following claims be interpreted to embrace all such variations and modifications.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional App. No. 63/116,078 filed Nov. 19, 2020 titled “Layout Design to Mitigate Current Crowding at the Device Endpoints.” The provisional application is incorporated by reference herein as if reproduced in full below.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5352924 | Mahant-Shetti | Oct 1994 | A |
5532924 | Hara | Jul 1996 | A |
6891250 | Sakamoto | May 2005 | B1 |
9029909 | Blanchard et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9035350 | Blanchard et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9054706 | Blanchard et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9054707 | Blanchard et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9059710 | Blanchard et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9190894 | Blanchard et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9203400 | Blanchard et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9203401 | Blanchard et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9209713 | Blanchard et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9209798 | Blanchard et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9231582 | Blanchard et al. | Jan 2016 | B1 |
9337262 | Blanchard et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9355853 | Blanchard et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9356595 | Blanchard et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9369125 | Blanchard et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9374084 | Blanchard et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9374085 | Blanchard et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9444449 | Bundschuh et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9614028 | Blanchard et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9647553 | Blanchard et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9660551 | Blanchard et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9679999 | Blanchard et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9742385 | Alexander | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9755018 | Cheng et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9786773 | Blanchard et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9787298 | Blanchard et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9787304 | Blanchard et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9799731 | Alexander | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9818615 | Blanchard et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9899868 | Blanchard et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9900002 | Blanchard et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
10056372 | Alexander | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10211283 | Blanchard et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10418471 | Blanchard et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10497699 | Blanchard et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10580885 | Blanchard et al. | Mar 2020 | B1 |
10892354 | Blanchard et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
20050212088 | Akaki | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20090029510 | Kerr | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20100173459 | Kerr | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20130146894 | Cheng | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20150123246 | Hu | May 2015 | A1 |
20160005732 | Wood | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160093722 | Tilke | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160344300 | Alexander | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170179239 | Nitta | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170179267 | Hikasa | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170287721 | Wood | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180130898 | Blanchard et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20190043969 | Wood | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190363196 | Wood | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20200111672 | Blanchard | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200321455 | Wood | Oct 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
105308750 | Feb 2016 | CN |
2954557 | Dec 2015 | EP |
2510716 | Aug 2014 | GB |
2524699 | Sep 2015 | GB |
2546475 | Jul 2017 | GB |
2572702 | Oct 2019 | GB |
201834373 | Sep 2018 | TW |
2014122472 | Aug 2014 | WO |
2018109452 | Jun 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2021/58915, dated Feb. 3, 2022. |
“B-Tran—Bi-Directional Bi-Polar Junction TRANsistor”; White Paper (2), Apr. 2016, idealpower.com, p. 1-11. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220157974 A1 | May 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63116078 | Nov 2020 | US |