Patent Grant
7996087
1. Field of the Invention
The systems and methods of this invention relate to electrical stimulation of the heart and other body tissues by means of an implantable device. Specifically the present invention relates to systems and methods for providing such stimulation without the use of conventional lead/electrode systems. More specifically, the present application provides systems and methods for treatment of heart failure and for terminating heart arrhythmias with implantable pacing systems and components.
Electrical stimulation of body tissues is used throughout medicine for treatment of both chronic and acute conditions. Among many examples, peripheral muscle stimulation is reported to accelerate healing of strains and tears, bone stimulation is likewise indicated to increase the rate of bone regrowth/repair in fractures, and nerve stimulation is used to alleviate chronic pain. A commonly implanted device utilizing electrical stimulation is the cardiac pacemaker. Further there is encouraging research in the use of electrical stimulation to treat a variety of nerve and brain conditions, such as essential tremor, Parkinson's disease, migraine headaches, functional deficits due to stroke, and epileptic seizures.
Devices to provide such stimulation may be applied externally in some cases, or in other cases it is more advantageous to implant all or part of the device. This invention pertains to devices in which at least one portion providing direct electrical stimulation to the body tissue is either permanently or temporarily implanted. Such devices include pacemakers, implantable defibrillators, and other devices for stimulating cardiac and other tissues.
Electrical energy sources connected to electrode/lead wire systems have typically been used to stimulate tissue within the body. The use of lead wires is associated with significant problems such as complications due to infection, lead failure, and electrode/lead dislodgement.
The requirement for leads in order to accomplish stimulation also limits the number of accessible locations in the body. The requirement for leads has also limited the ability to stimulate at multiple sites (multisite stimulation). For instance, the treatment of epilepsy could require a minimum of perhaps 5 or 6 stimulation sites. Other diseases, such as Parkinson's disease, would benefit from more stimulation sites than the two utilized in current systems.
Beyond the problems of outright failure and placement difficulties, pacemaker leads inherently cause problems for pacemaker systems by acting as antennae, coupling electromagnetic interference (EMI) into the pacemaker electronics. Particularly problematic is interference with cardiac electrogram sensing and signal processing circuitry. With the exponential rise in the number of cellular telephones, wireless computer networks, and the like, pacemaker lead induced EMI will continue to spur increased complexity in the design of, and require significant testing of pacemaker devices.
The most commonly implanted stimulation device is the cardiac pacemaker. A pacemaker is a battery-powered electronic device implanted under the skin, connected to the heart by an insulated metal lead wire with a tip electrode. Pacemakers were initially developed for and are most commonly used to treat bradycardia, slow heart rates, which may result from a number of conditions. More recently, advancements in pacemaker complexity, and associated sensing and pacing algorithms have allowed progress in using pacemakers for the treatment of other conditions, notably heart failure (HF) and fast heart rhythms (tachyarrhythmia/tachycardia).
In a common application, pacemaker leads are placed through the skin into a subclavian vein or branch to access the venous side of the cardiovascular system. Such systems can be either single chamber with a lead placed in either the right atrium or right ventricle, or dual chamber systems with one lead placed in contact with the right atrial wall and a second lead placed in contact with the right ventricular wall. For the treatment of HF, through what is commonly known as cardiac resynchronization therapy, bi-ventricular pacing is utilized, requiring that an additional lead be placed in contact with the left ventricle. To access the left ventricle, the third lead is typically advanced into the right atrium, into the orifice of the coronary sinus, and then maneuvered through the coronary sinus veins to a position on the epicardial aspect of the posterolateral or lateral wall of the left ventricle.
Though now less common after nearly five decades of improvement in designs and materials, failure of a pacemaker lead is still a significant risk to the patient not only for the loss of pacing which may represent a life-threatening event, but also due to the fact that once implanted, pacemaker leads are only extracted with a procedure or surgery of significant risk. Additionally, the location of an existing non-functional lead, if not removable, may prevent implantation of a replacement lead. Pacemaker leads may fail due to a number of reasons including breakage of the insulator or conductor and loose or incompatible connectors.
In biventricular pacing for HF, placement of the third lead to contact the left ventricle remains a significant problem. The coronary sinus is a complicated venous pathway with multiple branches which bend and narrow with considerable variation as they extend distally onto the epicardium of the left ventricle. Placement of the third lead requires significant skill on the part of the physician. In order to provide adequate steerability and pushability, the design of the left ventricular lead or a lead introduction system/device is much more complicated than regular pacing leads. Often the positioning and placement of the left ventricular lead can take over an hour to perform, exposing the patient to increased fluoroscopy radiation and increased procedure risks. In some patients (7.5% in the MIRACLE study) an acceptable lead placement is not possible due to anatomic constraints or phrenic nerve pacing. Additionally, lead dislodgement and loss of pacing have been common complications in the use of these coronary sinus leads (10-20% complication rates within the first 6 months of device placement).
The requirement for a lead to accomplish left ventricular stimulation limits the placement to either the coronary sinus vein as described above or an epicardial placement which uses surgical techniques to place the lead on the epicardium and then tunneling of the lead to the location of the pacing device for connection. Left ventricular leads are not placed inside the heart chamber as they are for the right-sided leads for several reasons. They would have to be chronically situated retrograde across the aortic valve or transeptally across the mitral valve which could cause aortic or mitral valvular insufficiency. The patients would be subject to risk of thromboembolic complications from having leads in the arterial circulation. Retrograde insertion of a pacing lead into the left ventricle via the aorta would require a permanent arterial puncture for lead insertion, permanent aortic regurgitation, and permanent anticoagulation to prevent thrombus formation. Alternatively, atrial transeptal puncture from the right atrium to insert a pacing lead into the left atrium or left ventricle also requires permanent anticoagulation, and for left ventricular sites, would cause mitral regurgitation. Moreover, all pacemaker leads are associated with an incidence of infection, and the risk of valvular endocarditis is greater in the left heart.
In patients receiving a bi-ventricular pacing system, site selection for placement of the left ventricular lead has been found to be critically important in order to provide hemodynamic benefit. Up to 40% of patients receiving bi-ventricular pacing for the treatment of HF do not benefit (i.e. hemodynamic measures and HF functional class do not improve or deteriorate). The most important cause for lack of benefit is thought by experts to be due to suboptimal or incorrect left ventricular stimulation site. However, restrictions imposed by the difficulty of positioning and by the anatomy of the coronary sinus and its branches often limit the ability to select a more optimal left ventricular pacing site. The ability to precisely select the left ventricular site for stimulation in combination with right ventricular stimulation, would aid in the treatment of HF.
Moreover, left ventricular stimulation currently is restricted to sites on the epicardial (outer) surface of the heart; the coronary sinus courses on the epicardium, and surgically implanted left ventricular leads are screwed into the epicardium. Recent data indicates that endocardial (inside lining) or subendocardial (inside layer) stimulation sites in the left ventricle provide additional benefit.
Importantly, clinical trial data now suggest that pacing of the left ventricle alone may result in hemodynamic benefit equivalent to that of bi-ventricular pacing. Thus, a leadless pacing system has the potential to accomplish the benefit of bi-ventricular pacing without the need for a right ventricular pacing lead or electrodes.
It would also be beneficial to provide more physiological right ventricular pacing for patients without HF. In normal physiology, the right ventricle is first stimulated in the upper septal area, and then the impulse travels down specially conducting pathways to the right ventricular apex. However, pacing the right ventricle is virtually always accomplished from a lead tip electrode located in the right ventricular apex, such that the subsequent conduction pathway is abnormal and slow. Clinical trials have recently shown that in patients with and without A-V block, pacing from the right ventricular apex can result in increased total mortality and re-hospitalization for heart failure. Thus it would be advantageous to be able to pace the right ventricle at more physiological locations such as the upper septum. The most physiological location to pace the ventricle in patients with sinus nodal or A-V junction conduction disease is to directly pace the His bundle. However, this location is very difficult to access from the superior (vena cava) approach mandated by lead-based systems that attach to a pectorally implanted pulse generator. It would be beneficial to deliver electrodes from the inferior (vena cava) approach via the femoral veins, in which catheter positioning in the A-V junction region is known to be easier. For instance, in a published series of permanent His bundle pacing, the His bundle was first identified using a temporary catheter inserted via the femoral vein, and this catheter was left in place to mark the location to target the site to implant the permanent pacing lead. In patients with lower conduction disease involving the A-V junction or bundle branches, the most physiological pacing sites have been found to be the left ventricular septum or left ventricular apex. These are locations in proximity to the specialized Purkinje conduction network. These locations are not accessible using current transvenous lead-based pacing systems. It would be advantageous to be able to select the pacing site in order to model more normal conduction.
Still another advantage of a leadless pacemaker system would be increased compatibility with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Current pacemaker pulse generators are made of materials and/or contain shielding that is generally compatible with the high static and alternating magnetic fields of MRI. However, lead wires are typically constructed with coiled metallic conductors, which are subject to induced currents from the magnetic field. Such currents can cause unwanted stimulation of the heart, and potentially damage the pacemaker pulse generator. A leadless pacemaker system will obviously eliminate the problem of current induced in the lead wires, though proper materials selection and shielding will still have to be employed in the design of the implantable components.
Recently, the concept of a leadless, subcutaneous implantable defibrillator has been proposed e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 6,647,292 (Bardy). In this concept high energy electrical waveforms are delivered between electrodes implanted in subcutaneous chest regions creating sufficient energy density within the thoracic volume to terminate ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF). This uses the same electrical field density concept for VT/VF termination as external application or as implanted defibrillator devices with electrodes on leads in the heart. In external defibrillation, energy is delivered between electrodes on the skin surface. In this subcutaneous approach electrodes are implanted beneath the skin but not in contact with the heart. In common implantable systems one of the defibrillation electrodes may consist of the metal enclosure of the implanted controller with the other electrode a coil on a lead placed in the right side (right ventricle) of the heart.
The subcutaneous implantable defibrillator system has no direct contact with cardiac tissue so there are added difficulties incorporating pacing therapy compared to lead-based pacemakers. To pace with subcutaneous electrodes, a sufficient electrical field must be created between two electrodes across the chest volume in order to reach pacing stimulation thresholds in the heart. This method also has no capability to precisely localize the electrical effect in the heart. Since this is a field effect, all muscles and nerves in the chest are exposed to the electrical field. The pacing pulse energy levels required to stimulate cardiac tissue using this electrical field approach are sufficiently high that chest muscle contractions and pain sensations would be associated with subcutaneous pacing. While pain occurs with high energy defibrillating discharges of all implantable defibrillators, no pain occurs with low-energy pacing using intracardiac leads. A subcutaneously implanted device implementing pacing would cause patient pain and would not be accepted when compared to a pain-free alternative. It would be highly advantageous to have a leadless system that would be capable of high energy defibrillation and also contain painless pacing capability.
In addition to using high energy electrical waveforms for the termination of VT/VF, lead-based implantable defibrillator systems typically also contain pacing algorithms that are effective in terminating VT/VF, referred to as antitachycardia pacing (ATP). For ATP, both the lead-based implantable system and the leadless subcutaneous system concepts have limitations in selecting the location of the pacing application, particularly in the left side of the heart. VT can be readily terminated using low voltage pacing stimulation if the site of the pacing is near the ventricular tachycardia focus or reentrant circuit. However, this is usually in the left ventricle, and close to the endocardium. As noted above, current pacemaker/defibrillator devices incorporate antitachycardia pacing but the pacing site is limited to the right ventricular lead or is subject to the same limitations previously described for left-sided lead placements. Further, right-sided locations have been shown to be less effective in electrophysiology laboratory testing, especially for VT's of high rate which are more serious. Pacing stimuli must stimulate cardiac tissue in the excitable region (excitable gap) of the VT reentry circuit in order to terminate the VT. Most VT circuits are located in the subendocardial layer of the left ventricle. For more rapid rate VT's, the excitable gap is small and the pacing stimuli must be very close to the VT reentry circuit for successful VT termination. In current pacemaker/defibrillator devices, if antitachycardia pacing is ineffective in terminating VT, painful high energy electrical field shocks are delivered. Therefore, it would be advantageous to be able to select the pacing site, particularly near the endocardium and in the left ventricle. Having the capability to select the location for a left ventricular lead for terminating episodes of ventricular tachycardia using antitachycardia pacing techniques would be expected to be more effective compared to current devices.
Another limitation of both the requirement of having leads and of having limited access to the left heart is in the emerging area of multisite pacing for termination of atrial and ventricular fibrillation. These arrhythmias typically arise in and are maintained by the left atrium and left ventricle. Studies have demonstrated the presence of excitable gaps within the tissue during atrial fibrillation (animal and human studies) and ventricular fibrillation (animal studies). By placing and stimulating at multiple pacing sites, regional pacing capture can be obtained during these arrhythmias. This means that if stimulation is delivered at the appropriate timing to a sufficient number of sites, in the appropriate locations, termination of atrial and ventricular fibrillation is possible. The advantage of terminating fibrillation with selected site left ventricular pacing would be the avoidance of painful high energy shocks. In this application the capability for left-sided stimulation and multi-sites of stimulation would be advantageous.
In addition to the termination of tachyarrhythmias, implanted pacemakers and defibrillators have been used to prevent tachyarrhythmias. In patients receiving permanent pacemakers, the dual chamber (DDD) mode has been shown to result in fewer episodes of AF compared to single chamber (VVI) mode in several large clinical trials. DDD pacing that incorporates simultaneous multisite stimulation of both the high right atrium and CS ostium has also been compared to standard single atrial site DDD pacing for the suppression of AF, showing a modest reduction of AF episodes. Atrial stimulation at a site or multiple sites other than the usual right atrial appendage may be advantageous for the prevention of atrial fibrillation by shortening total atrial activation time. Right atrial sites in Koch's triangle and Bachman's bundle may reduce atrial activation time by stimulating near or within atrial conduction tracts or within other tracts that are part of the normal conduction pathway. In an experimental canine model (Becker), either 4 pacing sites (2 in RA and 2 in LA) or one in the interatrial septum were required for suppression of AF. While these results are very promising, they present a technical obstacle for current pacemaker systems. The use of multisite pacing incorporating pacing sites in the left atrium for the suppression of AF has not been evaluated in humans because of all the issues of using multiple leads and in using leads within the left heart.
It follows that if AF may be able to be suppressed with multisite atrial pacing (especially in the left atrium), that VF may be able to be suppressed with multisite ventricular pacing (especially in the left ventricle). However, the difficulties associated with the implantation of multiple leads in the left ventricle has rendered this form of prevention impossible.
For these reasons, it would be desirable to accomplish stimulation without the need for lead wires. In this application we describe methods and apparatus, using acoustic energy for an implantable leadless stimulator system, that overcome limitations in pacing site selection. In co-pending applications we further describe improved stimulating devices. Methods and systems to evaluate and optimize positioning for implantation of this invention are described herein.
2. Description of the Background Art
The present invention provides methods and devices to electrically stimulate cardiac muscle and other body tissue utilizing acoustic energy to transmit both energy and signal information from a first implanted device to a second implanted device. The first implanted device, generally referred to as the controller-transmitter or acoustic controller-transmitter, provides appropriate timing and control functions and transmits acoustic energy to the second device. The second implanted device, generally referred to as the receiver-stimulator, receives the acoustic energy and converts it into electrical energy and applies that electrical energy to stimulating electrodes. The second device is adapted to be permanently implanted at a location where it is desired to provide electrical stimulus, with stimulating electrodes in direct contact with the cardiac muscle or other body tissue. Optionally, two or more receiver-stimulators may be implanted to be controlled by a single controller-transmitter.
A cardiac pacemaker (or defibrillator/cardioversion unit as described below) employing ultrasonic energy transfer according to the present invention comprises an implantable receiver-stimulator device adapted to be implanted in or attached to any desired location either endocardially, epicardially, or intramyocardially. Various minimally invasive, transvascular techniques and tools (e.g. catheters, stylets) would be adapted and used to deliver, place, embed, and secure the receiver-stimulator device to these locations. The receiver-stimulator would additionally be adapted to provide permanent attachment to the implant site including possibly the use of helical coils, barbs, tines, clips, or the like. Chronic endothelialization would be encouraged by design features such as tines or irregularities in surface, or by bonding onto its outer surface materials which are known to stimulate cellular growth and adhesion. Alternatively, the receiver-stimulator could be adapted for implantation in the coronary vasculature at preferred sites for stimulation, e.g., being incorporated into a stent-like platform suitable for intravascular delivery and deployment. In a specific embodiment, the device could reside on the outer surface of a stent and be held in place between the outer stent wall and the inner vessel wall. Functionally, the receiver-stimulator device comprises 1) an ultrasound transducer to receive the acoustic energy from a controller-transmitter device and transform it into electrical energy, 2) an electrical circuit to transform the alternating electrical energy into a direct current or waveform having other characteristics, and 3) electrodes to transfer the electrical energy to the myocardium. The receiver-stimulator would use signal information from the acoustic energy transmission to configure the electrical output, for example the pulse width of the transmission would determine the pulse duration/width of the electrical output waveform. Additionally, the receiver-stimulator may comprise circuitry for additional control logic, for example selecting activation of individual receiver-stimulators (on-off control), timing delays, waveform shape adjustments, or the like. In particular, when more than one receiver-stimulator is implanted to be controlled by a single controller-transmitter, the transmitted energy signal may contain addressing or selection information identifying which receiver-stimulator is to be activated at any particular time.
Subsequently, a controller-transmitter device would be implanted subcutaneously utilizing known surgical techniques (above or beneath the pectoral muscles) near the heart; this device containing some or most or all elements of currently available pacemaker systems, with specific adaptations pertinent to this invention. Such typical pacemaker elements may include a power source, pacemaker control and timing circuitry, a sensing system possibly comprised of ECG sensing electrodes, motion detectors, body or other temperature sensors, pressure sensors, impedance sensors (e.g., for measuring respiration cycles or lung edema), or other types of physiologic sensors, signal conditioning and analysis functions for the various electrodes and detectors, and a system to communicate with an outside console for data transmission, diagnostic, and programming functions typically through a radiofrequency (RF) link. Additionally, the controller-transmitter device would contain an ultrasound amplifier and an ultrasound transducer to generate acoustic energy, and transmit such energy in the general direction of the heart and specifically in the direction of the implanted receiver-stimulator device. The duration, timing, and power of the acoustic energy transmission would be controlled as required, in response to detected natural or induced physiological events or conditions, and per known electrophysiological parameters, by the pacemaker control electronics.
A single receiver-stimulator device may be implanted as described above for single site pacing; additionally it would be possible to implant a plurality of receiver-stimulator devices which would stimulate either simultaneously by receiving the same transmitted acoustic energy, or sequentially through fixed or programmable delays after receiving the same transmitted acoustic energy, or independently by responding only to signal information of the transmitted acoustic energy of a specific character (i.e., of a certain frequency, amplitude, or by other modulation or encoding of the acoustic waveform) intended to energize only that specific device.
In a first preferred embodiment a leadless cardiac pacemaker would be employed as a left ventricular pacemaker functioning as a “slave” pacemaker to an implanted conventional (i.e., utilizing leads/electrodes) right heart pacemaker, either a single or preferably a dual chamber type. The purpose of such a slave system would be to provide left ventricular pacing synchronous with the right ventricular pacing provided by the right heart pacemaker as an advantageous treatment for patients with HF, but without necessitating the placement of a left ventricular lead.
In such an embodiment the receiver-stimulator would be implanted at a desired location within the left ventricle, preferably fully embedded within the myocardium. A specialized controller-transmitter would then be implanted subcutaneously at a location allowing insonification of the implanted receiver-stimulator. The specialized “slave” controller-transmitter would include sensing electrodes on or incorporated into its external surface and signal processing circuitry and algorithms to allow it to detect pacing artifact signals from an implanted conventional right heart pacemaker and/or the patient's electrogram (electrocardiographic recording). Signal processing and specialized algorithms would differentiate pacing artifact signals, native cardiac electrogram signals occurring from intrinsic atrial and/or ventricular activation, and/or native cardiac electrogram signals occurring from non-intrinsic atrial and/or ventricular activation initiated from pacing. The slave controller-transmitter would then respond to the right atrial or right ventricular or both pacing artifact signals from the right heart pacemaker, or would respond to detected intrinsic or non-intrinsic activation, and transmit acoustic energy to the implanted receiver-stimulator in order to produce a left ventricular stimulation at the desired time in relation to the right atrial and/or right ventricular paced artifact or detected/sensed cardiac event. For example, when transmission occurs immediately upon the detection of a right ventricular pacing artifact, a left ventricular pacing stimulus is delivered by the receiver-stimulator pacing output in the left ventricle to produce bi-ventricular pacing therapy.
Alternately, the implanted controller-transmitter could be adapted to work in conjunction with a conventional bi-ventricular pacemaker typically having three leads for the right atrium, right ventricle, and left ventricle. In one adaptation, in order to eliminate the requirement to place the left ventricular lead, the controller-transmitter would connect via a special wire to the conventional pacemaker's left ventricular output. The controller-transmitter would then detect the conventional pacemaker's left ventricular pacing output from the special wire and immediately transmit acoustic energy to activate the receiver-stimulator implanted into the left ventricle. Such a system would offer elimination of the left ventricular lead and require only a simple controller-transmitter unburdened by sensing electrodes and associated signal processing circuitry and algorithms. In another adaptation, the input for the left ventricular lead in the conventional bi-ventricular pacemaker header could be sealed off, and the specialized “slave” controller-transmitter would operate as described in the paragraph above.
Another preferred embodiment is a leadless stand alone single chamber pacemaker. Such an embodiment would utilize the same or a similar implantable receiver-stimulator device as described above, however in this case it would be implanted into or attached to the right atrium of the heart in order to provide right atrial pacing, or implanted into or attached to either the right ventricle or left ventricle of the heart in order to provide right or left ventricular pacing. The controller-transmitter would then incorporate most or all of the features of a contemporary single chamber pacemaker device, typically known as an AAI (atrial) or VVI (ventricular) mode pacing. Such conventional pacemakers commonly utilize right atrial or right ventricular leads for treatment of bradyarrhythmias, or slow heart rate. A pacemaker system per this invention would advantageously not require the use of electrical leads of any kind. Moreover, the ability to use a left ventricular lead alone enables the potential hemodynamic benefit of left ventricular pacing compared to a right ventricular pacing without the use of electrical leads of any kind. Further enhancement to this single chamber pacemaker system would include other patient physiological sensor(s) that adjust the patient's paced rate in response to the sensor, e.g., motion detectors. This would provide the capability for AAIR and VVIR modes of pacing.
As described previously, sensing of electrical activity in the body and other patient physiological information such as movement, blood pressure, intracavity impedance changes, or heart sounds would be provided from electrodes and/or other sensors incorporated onto or into or within the housing of the implanted controller-transmitter. In a particular adaptation the transmitting transducer for the controller-transmitter may be used as a sensor for mechanical/motion sensing or for heart sound sensing. Examples for electrical activity sensing include intrinsic cardiac beats, pacemaker pacing artifacts, non-intrinsic cardiac beats initiated by pacemaker pacing outputs, and the like.
In another preferred embodiment of the leadless cardiac pacemaker system a dual chamber pacemaker could be constructed, with function similar to present dual chamber (DDD) pacemakers. Such a pacemaker would be realized by utilizing two implantable receiver-stimulator devices and either one or two implantable controller-transmitter devices. One receiver-stimulator device would be implanted into or attached to the right atrium as described above, the second would be implanted into or attached to the right or left ventricle. One implanted controller-transmitter device would transmit ultrasound to the two implanted receiver-stimulators, causing the receiver-stimulators to provide pacing stimulation to the atrium and ventricle either simultaneously or sequentially. If sequential, timed stimulation to the atrium and ventricle is required, various means to accomplish this could be incorporated into the leadless pacemaker system. In one possibility, a single acoustic waveform would be transmitted at the time necessary to activate the first, typically atrial, receiver-stimulator. The second, typically ventricular, receiver stimulator device would be of a modified design incorporating circuitry and devices to capture and temporarily store the acoustic energy transmitted at the time of atrial stimulation, and after a fixed delay provide this energy to its stimulation electrodes to pace the ventricle. Sequential stimulation could also be accomplished under direct control of the controller-transmitter, possibly utilizing the sequential transmission of acoustic energy at different frequencies, with each receiver-stimulator tuned to respond only to a single unique frequency. Other methods including amplitude modulation, frequency modulation, time-division modulation, or other modulation or encoding of the acoustic waveform would also permit selective and sequential pacing from multiple implanted receiver-stimulator devices. Alternately, two controller-transmitters could be implanted, each configured to transmit acoustic energy only to one specific receiver-stimulator, such configuration achieved either through spatial separation, frequency separation, or other modulation or encoding means as previously described.
In such a dual chamber system, sensing of the electrogram or other patient physiological information would be provided from electrodes and/or other sensors incorporated onto or into or within the housing of the implanted controller-transmitter. Further enhancement to this dual chamber pacemaker system would include other patient physiological sensor(s) that adjust the patient's paced rate in response to the sensor, e.g., motion detectors. This would provide the capability for DDDR modes of pacing.
It can be seen that a dual chamber pacemaker system as described above could be further adapted as a bi-ventricular pacemaker for HF applications. In one embodiment of a bi-ventricular pacemaker the system described above, with appropriate adaptations to the timing considerations between the two pacing signals, could be employed with one receiver-stimulator implanted into the right ventricle and the second receiver-stimulator implanted into the left ventricle. In a further enhancement a third receiver-stimulator could be implanted into the right atrium to provide both dual chamber right-sided pacing with synchronous left ventricular pacing. As described above, means to provide proper sequencing of the multiple pacing stimuli would be employed.
In another preferred embodiment, the leadless cardiac pacemaker system could be used in conjunction with a conventional single chamber or dual chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) device. The ICD device utilizes a conventional lead/electrode system for (optionally) right atrial and right ventricular sensing and pacing, with defibrillation electrodes combined onto the right ventricular lead. A leadless receiver-stimulator device per this invention could be implanted into the left ventricle, with the combined device incorporating left ventricular pacing, similar to current lead-based CRT-D (integrated ICD and cardiac resynchronization pacing) devices. A receiver-stimulator implanted into the left ventricle would receive acoustic energy from a specialized controller-transmitter to provide stimulus to the left ventricle. The specialized controller-transmitter would be implanted subcutaneously at a location allowing insonification of the implanted receiver-stimulator. Such a system would be advantageous with respect to conventional CRT-D pacemaker/defibrillators, again by eliminating the requirement for the left ventricular lead and the problems associated with its placement.
In another preferred embodiment, the leadless cardiac pacemaker system could be combined with a conventional pacemaker system in a single device. Preferably, such a dual chamber (DDD) pacemaker would utilize a conventional lead/electrode system for right atrial and ventricular sensing and pacing connected to the header of the pulse generator case. The DDD pulse generator case would also contain an acoustic transmitter. In addition to the right atrial and right ventricular pacing accomplished through the conventional leads, a leadless receiver-stimulator device per this invention could be implanted into the left ventricle. The implanted receiver-stimulator would receive acoustic energy from the transmitter incorporated into the otherwise conventional pacemaker to provide stimulus to the left ventricle. Such a system would be advantageous with respect to conventional bi-ventricular pacemakers by eliminating the requirement for the left ventricular lead and the problems associated with the placement thereof.
In still another preferred embodiment, the leadless cardiac pacemaker system could be combined with conventional implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) technology in a single device. Preferably, such a device would utilize a conventional lead/electrode system for right atrial and ventricular sensing and pacing and defibrillation connected to the header of the pulse generator case. The ICD pulse generator case would also contain an acoustic transmitter. In addition to the right atrial and ventricular pacing and defibrillation accomplished through the conventional leads, a leadless receiver-stimulator device per this invention could be implanted into the left ventricle, with the combined device incorporating bi-ventricular pacing, similar to current lead-based (CRT-D) devices. A receiver-stimulator implanted into the left ventricle would receive acoustic energy from the transmitter incorporated into the otherwise conventional ICD device to provide stimulus to the left ventricle. Such a system would be advantageous with respect to conventional CRT-D pacemaker/defibrillators, again by eliminating the requirement for the left ventricular lead and the problems associated with its placement.
Patients requiring ICD devices have potentially lethal heart rhythms including ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Having the additional capability to select the location for a left ventricular lead placement for terminating episodes of ventricular tachycardia using antitachycardia pacing techniques should be more effective compared to current devices. The advantage of terminating tachycardia with selected-site left ventricular pacing may be the avoidance of painful high energy shocks. Moreover, the capability of implanting multiple receiver-stimulators in any heart chamber may allow multisite pacing for the prevention or termination of atrial fibrillation and ventricular fibrillation.
The methods and systems of the present invention may be utilized for antitachycardia pacing (ATP), including prevention algorithms, utilizing acoustic energy to transmit energy and signal information from an acoustic controller-transmitter, which may optionally be implanted or externally located, to one or more implanted receiver-stimulators having electrodes adapted to be implanted in direct contact with cardiac tissue. The acoustic controller-transmitter will usually have ECG or other monitoring means that allow detection of tachycardia, permitting tiered treatment via pacing and optionally higher energy defibrillation and/or cardioversion. In all cases, the energy will be delivered and/or controlled by acoustic signals from the controller-transmitter to the acoustic receiver-stimulator(s). The acoustic receiver-stimulators will convert the acoustic energy into stimulating/pacing/defibrillation/cardioversion electrical energy.
Such a leadless pacing system may advantageously be employed as a stand alone antitachycardia pacemaker. In this embodiment of the present invention, one or more of the receiver-stimulators would be implanted at one or more cardiac sites, and the controller-transmitter may be either a subcutaneously implanted device or an externally applied device.
The leadless pacing system could also be employed along with an implanted conventional (i.e., utilizing leads/electrodes) right heart pacemaker, or along with an implanted conventional right heart pacemaker/cardioverter/defibrillator, either a single or preferably a dual chamber type. The purpose of such a combination of systems would be to provide site-specific pacing for termination or prevention of tachyarrhythmias. Alternatively, the leadless pacing system implanted in combination with a pacemaker/cardioverter/defibrillator provides the patient with a high energy shock capability in case the pacing therapy is ineffective in termination of the arrhythmia.
In a further embodiment a leadless cardiac pacemaker system would be employed along with an implanted subcutaneous, leadless cardioverter/defibrillator. The purpose of such a combination of systems would be to provide a leadless pacing capability for antitachycardia pacing therapy, for backup pacing post shock delivery, and/or for bradycardia pacing support. The implanted subcutaneous, leadless cardioverter/defibrillator provides the patient with a high energy shock capability in case the pacing therapy is ineffective in termination of the arrhythmia or accelerates the tachycardia to fibrillation.
In still further embodiments, a leadless cardiac pacemaker/defibrillator system would be employed as a single integrated high energy electrical shock defibrillator and a leadless site-specific pacing system. The purpose of this integration would be to provide a single subcutaneously implanted controller device.
Similarly, the controller-transmitter can be adapted to be used concomitantly with a leadless, subcutaneous defibrillator to provide the pacing capability. This can be done either as a standalone antitachycardia pacing system, as a defibrillator-pacing system where communication exchanges by a direct connection between the defibrillator and the controller-transmitter, or as a single integrated device system with the capability for acoustic transmission to a receiver-stimulator for pacing (bradycardia backup or for antitachycardia pacing therapy) and for electrical shock for defibrillation.
In further aspects of the present invention, the controller-transmitter device may be implanted at a remote tissue location within or external to the body. The receiver-stimulator device may be either permanently implanted or temporarily placed at a target location with stimulating electrodes in direct contact with the body tissue to be stimulated. By observing changes in a patient response and/or device measurement in response to different combinations of remote and target tissue locations, the sites chosen for permanent implantation may be optimized and selected. Patient response(s) may be any quantitative or qualitative physiologic responses to the stimulation, typically being associated with the desired beneficial response. Device measurement(s) could be signal strength, transmission efficiency, or the like.
Uses for such optimized placement methods include, but are not limited to, applying electrical stimulation for the treatment of peripheral muscle strains and tears, bone fractures, musculoskeletal inflammation, chronic pain, Parkinson's disease, epileptic seizures, high blood pressure, cardiac arrhythmias, heart failure, coma, stroke, hearing loss, dementia, depression, migraine headaches, sleep disorders, gastric motility disorders, urinary disorders, obesity, and diabetes.
The present application describes methods and systems to evaluate effectiveness and optimize the positioning of these implantable leadless systems. Both the controller-transmitter and the receiver-stimulator placements are optimized with these methods. Three methods are described using testing sequences prior to permanent implantation that involve placement of the devices in various locations of the body. In each method, for a set of device locations, a patient response or a device measurement is made. The optimum location is determined based upon the patient responses and/or the device measurements.
a and 1b illustrate acoustic cardiac pacing, defibrillation, and cardioversion systems constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
a and 2b illustrate different combinations of stand alone acoustic cardiac pacemakers constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
a and 3b are block diagrams showing the components of the acoustic controller-transmitter and acoustic receiver-stimulators of the present invention.
a-5c illustrate two embodiments of a small implantable receiver-stimulator according to the principles of the present invention.
a-7c illustrate systems according to the present invention for treating tachycardias alone or in combination with pacing and defibrillator systems.
a and 9b illustrate an implanted cardiac pacemaker system in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
a, 10b, and 10c illustrate a system useful for optimizing implantation of the system of
The systems and devices described comprise a controller-transmitter device that will deliver acoustic energy and information to one or more implanted receiver-stimulator device(s) that will convert the acoustic energy to electrical energy of a form that can be used to electrically pace the heart. The acoustic energy can be applied with ultrasound as a single burst or as multiple bursts with appropriate selection of the following parameters:
The controller-transmitter device would contain an ultrasound transducer or transducers of appropriate size(s) and aperture(s) to generate sufficient acoustic power and signal information to achieve the desired stimulation at the location of an implanted receiver-stimulator device. Additionally, multiple implanted receiver-stimulator devices may be placed within the region insonified by the controller-transmitter device. Multiple receiver-stimulator implants may function simultaneously, however it is possible for multiple devices to function independently, either by responding only to a specific transmitted frequency, or through the use of a selective modulation technique such as amplitude modulation, frequency modulation, pulse width modulation, or through encoding techniques including time-division multiplexing. Such a pacemaker system comprising a controller-transmitter and at least one receiver-stimulator would preferably operate at an ultrasound frequency between 20 kHz and 10 MHz, and more preferably operate at a frequency between 100 kHz and 1 MHz, and most preferably operate at a frequency between 200 kHz and 500 kHz.
The signal information generated by the controller-transmitter will most often comprise pulse width and pulse amplitude information used by the receiver-stimulator to construct a corresponding electrical output. Alternatively, the signal information may comprise address information (identifying a particular receiver-stimulator device or group of devices to trigger), triggering information to initiate output (turn on or off) the receiver-stimulator device(s), delay information to control when the receiver-stimulator device(s) initiate output, the level or other characteristics of the electrical power to be delivered, and the like. The receiver-stimulator device(s) will usually have circuitry to permit decoding of the signal information (which will usually be encoded in the power transmission), and additional circuitry such as a digital gate which can turn on and off the electrical output, timer circuitry to permit a delay in turning on or off the electrical output, and the like.
The controller-transmitter device containing the transmitting transducer would be implanted typically just beneath the skin in the subcutaneous space but could also be placed beneath the pectoral muscles.
The controller-transmitter device would typically include sensors such as electrodes for detecting the patient's electrogram and/or pacing signals (pacing artifacts) from other devices, and in certain embodiments additional physiological sensors including but not limited to sensors which would detect the patient's motion, blood pressure, temperature, respiration, and/or heart sounds. Circuitry and algorithms for utilizing these signals for control of the pacemaker function would be provided. Such electrodes and other sensors would be preferably disposed on or incorporated into or within the housing of the controller-transmitter device.
The acoustic transmitter function may also be incorporated within a device providing conventional lead-based electrical stimulation, for example in a bi-ventricular pacemaker (CRT) or defibrillator (CRT-D) system wherein a conventional lead/electrode system would provide sensing from and stimulus to the right atrium and ventricle, and the receiver-stimulator would provide synchronized stimulation to the left ventricle.
Examples of leadless cardiac pacemaker systems are illustrated in
a illustrates a “slave” configuration for biventricular pacing in conjunction with a conventional implanted dual chamber pacemaker. In this example a controller-transmitter device 1 containing circuitry to provide pacing control and ultrasound transmission, plus means to communicate with an outside programmer 3 is implanted beneath the skin, and generally over the heart. An ultrasound signal is transmitted by this device through intervening tissue to the receiver-stimulator device 2, shown implanted in the left ventricle, containing means to receive this acoustic energy and convert it into an electrical pulse which may then be applied to the attached electrodes. In this example a conventional dual chamber (DDD) pacemaker 5 utilizing both a conventional right atrial lead 6 and conventional right ventricular lead 7 is also shown implanted. Controller-transmitter 1 incorporates sensing electrodes 4 and appropriate circuitry and algorithms (not shown) that allow detection of the patient's electrogram and/or the detection of pacing signal artifacts generated by conventional pacemaker 5, providing information whereby the control circuitry can at the proper time initiate the acoustic transmission which will result in left ventricular pacing.
b is a cross-sectional view of the heart in the previous example, showing a single receiver-stimulator device 2 implanted into the left ventricular myocardium, receiving acoustic energy from controller-transmitter 1. Conventional leads 6 and 7 from pacemaker 5 (not shown) are placed in the right atrium and right ventricle, respectively. Optionally (not shown), the receiver-stimulator device 2 could be incorporated into a vascular stent deployed into a coronary vein or artery on the epicardial surface of the left ventricle.
b shows a further adaptation wherein two receiver-stimulator devices 2 are implanted to achieve a leadless bi-ventricular pacemaker configuration. The first receiver-stimulator 2 is shown attached to the right ventricular apex with the second being attached to the left ventricular free wall. Both receiver-stimulator devices 2 receive acoustic energy from controller-transmitter 1, either simultaneously or selectively through methods that may include amplitude modulation, frequency modulation, time-division modulation, or other modulation or encoding of the acoustic waveform. In another adaptation (not shown) one of the receiver-stimulator devices could be implanted within the right atrium rather than the left or right ventricle to result in a dual chamber (DDD) type of pacemaker. In a further adaptation (not shown), three receiver stimulator devices could be implanted, into the right atrium, right ventricle, and left ventricle and activated either simultaneously or sequentially through the previously described methods.
A leadless cardiac pacemaker system is shown in more detail in the block diagram of
Referring to
Referring also to previously described
In practice, the amount of energy (amplitude) received by the implanted receiver-stimulator device will vary due to ultrasound attenuation caused by loss in the intervening tissue and bone, due to spatial location of the receiver-stimulator device with respect to the transmitted ultrasound beam as such a beam is typically non-uniform from edge-to-edge, and possibly due to orientation (rotation) of the receiver-stimulator device with respect to the controller-transmitter device. Such variation would affect the amplitude of the stimulation output pulse for any given ultrasound transmit power (acoustic pressure amplitude). This limitation can be overcome by adjusting the ultrasound transmit power until stimulation is consistent, a technique similar to that used currently to determine pacing thresholds at the time of pacemaker implantation; additionally this can be adjusted automatically by algorithms within the controller-transmitter device that periodically determine stimulation thresholds and adjust power transmission accordingly to compensate for any change in the system including relative movement between the transmitting and receiving devices. This limitation may also be mitigated by design of the transducer incorporated into the receiver-stimulator device to be omni-directional in its reception capability, for example by using a spherical transducer or by using multiple transducers disposed at appropriate angles to reduce or eliminate the directional sensitivity of the device.
a through 5c illustrate two embodiments of a small implantable receiver-stimulator of a cylindrical profile, suitable for placement by catheter, stylet, or other means adapted for its delivery.
As shown in
As depicted in
The leadless cardiac pacemaker system shown in
A simple block diagram of logic used for arrhythmia detection and antitachycardia pacing therapy control is depicted in
Examples of leadless cardiac pacemaker systems suitable for delivery of ATP are illustrated in
a illustrates a “slave” configuration for leadless ATP used in conjunction with a lead-based pacemaker, cardioverter, and/or defibrillator device. Similar to the previous description for
a illustrates a leadless ATP device used in conjunction with a leadless cardioverter or defibrillator device.
In
a, 10b, and 10c, illustrate a testing and positioning system for a leadless cardiac pacemaker system as in any of the above embodiments, for example as depicted in
An external controller-transmitter system 64 will generally be used for positioning and testing, which will typically be able to be reused on different patients. Controller-transmitter device 64 includes external acoustic transmitter 65 and manual or other controller 66, typically connected by cable 67, however it can be appreciated that the transmitter 65 could be integrated into controller 66 and the integrated device used as an external transmitter. Transmitter 65 is typically placed overlying the skin surface, with acoustic transmission gel used for coupling. Also used in the testing and positioning system, as shown in
A first method may be used in situations in which the ideal location for the controller-transmitter 61 is known or limited due to anatomic constraints, but more than one location for the receiver-stimulator 62 is possible. Typically, the external controller-transmitter 64 will be used for testing purposes with acoustic transmitter 65 positioned on the skin surface overlying its ideal or otherwise predetermined location. Transmission gel will be used as coupling agent between the external acoustic transmitter 65 and the skin. Alternatively, (shown in
One example (in addition to cardiac pacing) in which this method may be utilized is epilepsy, where the controller-transmitter location will be known because it will be confined to a site near the craniotomy. In this case, a multiplicity of receiver-stimulators will typically be implanted into the brain tissue. The controller-transmitter typically would be positioned outside of the brain tissue either within the craniotomy opening or outside the cranium under the skin. The positioning and testing of the placement of the receiver-stimulators will be based upon the effects of the electrical stimulation on electroencephagraphy mapping. Another example in which this method may be utilized is Parkinson's disease, wherein, similar to the treatment of epilepsy, the controller-transmitter will be confined to a site near the craniotomy and a multiplicity of receiver-stimulators will typically be implanted into brain tissue. In the case of Parkinson's disease, however, the placement of the receiver-stimulators may be based upon the effects of electrical stimulation on patient responses such as reducing tremor.
A second method of optimization may be used in situations in which the implant location for the receiver-stimulator is known, but the ideal location for the controller-transmitter implant may vary. The receiver-stimulator device 62 is first implanted in its ideal location or alternatively held in its ideal location by delivery system 68. The transmitter 65 of the external controller-transmitter device 64 is placed at the first test location on the skin, using transmission gel for coupling. Energy is then transmitted/delivered using external controller 66 to evaluate efficacy at this location. The transmitter 65 can be moved and the testing sequence repeated until the desired position is identified. The implantable controller-transmitter 61 is then implanted at the location identified to be optimal.
One example in which this method may be utilized is in the treatment of bone fractures. In this case, the location of the receiver-stimulator device will be determined by the location of the fracture. Possible locations for the controller-stimulator device can then be tested to optimize transmission of acoustic energy.
A third method of optimization may be used in situations in which the implant location for neither the receiver-stimulator device 62 nor the controller-transmitter device 61 is known. This method utilizes procedures specified above in both the first and second methods. In this situation, after testing the devices at initial locations, the locations of both the devices are changed in alternation in subsequent testing, and this is repeated until the desired, optimal results are obtained. Then, both devices 61 and 62 are implanted.
One example in which this third method may be utilized is a cardiac pacemaker capable of multisite pacing (such as a dual chamber pacemaker or bi-ventricular pacing for heart failure). There are many potential locations to implant the receiver-stimulator devices, but some locations will provide better physiological benefit to the patient. The ideal location for the controller-transmitter device will be the site where the most acoustic energy can be delivered to the multiple receiver-stimulator devices, but there may be some constraints on location imposed by the chest contour and the intervening lungs. Therefore, optimization of the implant locations for the devices may require testing at different sites for each device. The observed patient response would be evidence of pacing on the electrocardiogram or other measures of heart function such as blood pressure or contractility.
These methods can be beneficial to all the applications of the implantable leadless stimulator system and are not meant to be limited to the examples provided herein.
This application is a divisional of Ser. No. 11/315,023, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,610,092, filed on Dec. 21, 2005, which claims the benefit and priority of the following: U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/689,606, filed on Jun. 9, 2005; U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/639,027, filed on Dec. 21, 2004; and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/639,037, filed on Dec. 21, 2004, the full disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. The subject matter of this application is also related to that of Ser. No. 11/315,524, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,606,621, filed on Dec. 21, 2005, which claims the benefit of Provisional Application No. 60/639,056, filed on Dec. 21, 2004, the full disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3659615 | Enger | May 1972 | A |
| 3693627 | Berkovits | Sep 1972 | A |
| 3698398 | Berkovits | Oct 1972 | A |
| 3735756 | Richards et al. | May 1973 | A |
| 3832994 | Bicher et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
| 3857382 | Williams et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
| 3939844 | Peuignot | Feb 1976 | A |
| 3942534 | Allen et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
| 4181133 | Kolenik et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
| 4256115 | Bilitch | Mar 1981 | A |
| 4265228 | Zoll | May 1981 | A |
| 4280502 | Baker, Jr. et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
| 4561442 | Vollmann et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4577633 | Berkovits et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4651716 | Forester et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4690144 | Rise et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4830006 | Haluska et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 5018523 | Bach, Jr. et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5063928 | Grevis | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5103129 | Slayton et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5113859 | Funke | May 1992 | A |
| 5165403 | Mehra | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5170784 | Ramon | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5174289 | Cohen | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5186177 | O'Donnell et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5193539 | Schulman et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5292338 | Bardy | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5377166 | Kuhn | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5405367 | Schulman et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5411535 | Fujii et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5433731 | Hoegnelid et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5590657 | Cain et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5674251 | Combs et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5749909 | Schroeppel et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5751539 | Stevenson et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5757104 | Getman et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5766227 | Nappholz et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5800464 | Kieval | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5814089 | Stokes et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5817130 | Cox et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5844349 | Oakley et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5871506 | Mower | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5879303 | Averkiou et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5935158 | Holmstrom et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5978204 | Stevenson | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5998910 | Park et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6037704 | Welle | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6070101 | Struble et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6078837 | Peterson et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6110098 | Renirie et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6141588 | Cox et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6223079 | Bakels et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6233484 | Ben-Haim et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6264611 | Ishikawa et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6330475 | Renirie et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6366816 | Marchesi | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6408205 | Renirie et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6424234 | Stevenson | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6425869 | Rafter et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6439236 | Porter et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6445953 | Bulkes et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6464680 | Brisken et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6496715 | Lee et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6527729 | Turcott | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6534895 | Kadota et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| RE38119 | Mower | May 2003 | E |
| 6628989 | Penner et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6645145 | Dreschel et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6647292 | Bardy et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6654638 | Sweeney | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6671547 | Lyster et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6707230 | Smith et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6721597 | Bardy et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6728576 | Thompson et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6754528 | Bardy et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6754531 | Kroll et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6764446 | Wolinsky et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6788974 | Bardy et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6834204 | Ostroff et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6856835 | Bardy et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6970742 | Mann et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 7006864 | Echt et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7043292 | Tarjan et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7050849 | Echt et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7160258 | Imran et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7184830 | Echt et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7200437 | Nabutovsky et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
| 7283874 | Penner | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7349740 | Soykan et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7489967 | Von Arx et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7558631 | Cowan et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7606621 | Brisken et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7610092 | Cowan et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 20020077673 | Penner et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20030013974 | Natarajan et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030069625 | Ley et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20040015104 | Goldberger | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040167580 | Mann et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040172083 | Penner | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040204744 | Penner et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040260346 | Overall et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20060009831 | Lau et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060106442 | Richardson et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060135999 | Bodner et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060224067 | Giftakis et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060241701 | Markowitz et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20070032749 | Overall et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070088394 | Jacobson | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070088397 | Jacobson | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070088398 | Jacobson | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070150009 | Kveen et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070232936 | Mann et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070260286 | Giftakis et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070265677 | Giftakis et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 4330680 | Mar 2005 | DE |
| WO 9961058 | Dec 1999 | WO |
| WO 03070323 | Aug 2003 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20100063562 A1 | Mar 2010 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60689606 | Jun 2005 | US | |
| 60639027 | Dec 2004 | US | |
| 60639037 | Dec 2004 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11315023 | Dec 2005 | US |
| Child | 12554234 | US |
