1. Field
This disclosure generally relates to vacuum bags used in manufacturing and industrial processes, and deals more particularly with a device and method for detecting air leaks in a vacuum bag.
2. Background
Flexible vacuum bags are used in various manufacturing and industrial processes, such as the fabrication of composite structures and bonding of parts. For example, in the aerospace industry, without limitation, vacuum bags may be used to bond heat shield tiles to a metal backing. Vacuum bags may also used in vacuum bag molding, wherein a flexible bag formed from a polymer sheet such as Nylon® is placed over a part pre-form and sealed along a mold flange. A vacuum drawn in the bag eliminates entrapped air and excess resin, resulting in compaction of the pre-form. Similarly, vacuum assisted resin transfer molding (VARTM) may employ a vacuum bag to cover a pre-form or dry fabric on one-sided tooling. Air is evacuated and liquid resin from an external reservoir is drawn into the bag which is infused into the pre-form. Any leaks in the vacuum bag may allow air to enter and form bubbles in the resin matrix, resulting in an unacceptable amount of porosity in the matrix. Leaks in the vacuum bag may be relatively small and therefore difficult to observe by an operator. While various gas leak detection techniques are known, they are not always reliable and may not detect leaks quickly enough to be useful in repairing leaks while molding processes are underway.
Accordingly, there is a need for a leak detection system that allows instant detection of the location of leaks in the vacuum bag, without the use of complicated, external leak detection equipment or the need for highly experienced operating personnel. The disclosed embodiments are intended to satisfy this need.
Leaks or pressure gradients may be detected in gas impermeable, transparent membranes used to maintain a pressure differential. The leaks or pressure gradients are detected by a gas permeable film or coating placed on or near the membrane that emits or reflects light of various wavelengths in the area of the leak or pressure gradient. Rapid visual detection of air leaks in vacuum bags for example, may be achieved using a leak detection film placed between the inside face of the vacuum bag, and a part or composite pre-form. The leak detection film may be applied directly to the inside face of the bag, or may comprise a separate membrane that is placed over the pre-form before the bag is sealed. The leak detection film includes a gas permeable binder incorporating gas sensitive materials that react to the presence of the gas. The gas sensitive material changes in appearance in response to exposure to gas caused by a leak in the bag. The change in appearance may comprise a local change in color or change in the intensity of a color in the area surrounding the leak.
According to one disclosed embodiment, a device is provided for indicating the location of an air leak in a vacuum bag used in processing parts, comprising a film including oxygen sensitive material inside of and extending across the bag, the oxygen sensitive material changing in physical appearance at the general location of an air leak in the bag. The film may include an oxygen permeable binder incorporating the oxygen sensitive material. The film may be bonded to an inside face of the bag and may be formed from a flexible polymer or paint that is applied to the bag. The oxygen sensitive material may include light sensitive nano-particles responsive to light of a predetermined wavelength for emitting light indicating the location of the air leak. The oxygen sensitive material may be excited by light of a pre-selected wavelength to luminescence; the intensity of the luminescence changes in the area of an air leak due to the presence of oxygen. A dye may be added to the film in order to color the luminescence of the film.
According to another disclosed embodiment, a vacuum bag assembly used in bonding parts together comprises: a vacuum bag covering at least one of the parts and defining a space in which a vacuum may be drawn to assist in bonding the parts; and, a leak detection film inside of and extending across the bag, the leak detection film including oxygen sensitive material that changes in physical appearance at the general location of an air leak in the bag.
According to further another disclosed embodiment, a device is provided for detecting an air leak in a vacuum bag used in fabricating composite parts, comprising a film inside of and substantially coextensive with the area of the bag subjected to a vacuum. The film includes an oxygen permeable binder and an oxygen sensitive material held in the binder. The oxygen sensitive material has at least one visual characteristic that changes in the presence of oxygen introduced into the vacuum bag by an air leak. The film may comprise a coating formed on the inside face of the bag. The oxygen sensitive material may include pressure sensitive luminophores.
According to a further embodiment, a vacuum molding bag is provided, comprising: a flexible, substantially transparent polymer sheet having an inside face and an outside face; and, a film on the inside face of the polymer sheet, the film including an oxygen permeable binder and an oxygen sensitive material held in the binder. The oxygen sensitive material exhibits a change in the physical appearance of the film in the area of an air leak in the molding bag, thereby indicating the location of the air leak. Portions of the film may be removable from the polymer sheet in order to tailor the geometry of the film relative to a seal which surrounds a part pre-form or other object to be subjected to a vacuum.
According to still another embodiment, a device is provided for use in manufacturing and industrial processes to detect gas leaks in a gas impermeable, transparent membrane. The device comprises means extending across the membrane for providing a visual indication of the location of a gas leak in the membrane. The means for providing a visual indication may include a film that changes in appearance in the area of the gas leak. The film may includes a gas permeable binder, and means held in the binder for visually reacting to the presence of a gas reaching the film through the leak. The film may be attached to the membrane, and may be substantially coextensive with an area on the membrane over which leaks are to be detected. The visually reacting means includes pressure sensitive luminophores.
According to another embodiment, a device is provided for detecting gas leaks in a seal between a vacuum processing bag and a base, comprising: a film inside of the processing bag and disposed adjacent the seal, the film including a gas permeable binder and a gas sensitive material held in the binder, the gas sensitive material having at least one visual characteristic that changes in the presence of gas entering the process bag through a leak in the seal. The film may extend substantially across the seal, and between the process bag and the base.
According to one disclosed method embodiment, processing a part using a vacuum bag comprises the steps of: placing the part on a base; placing a leak detection film over the part; placing a substantially transparent vacuum bag over the sheet of leak detection film; sealing the bag against air infiltration; drawing an vacuum in the bag; and, detecting an air leak in the bag by detecting the location of a change in appearance of the leak detection film resulting from air entering the bag. The method may further include the step of illuminating the bag with light having a wavelength that causes the leak detection film to luminesce so that changes in the intensity of the luminescence in the area of the air leak can be detected.
According to another method embodiment, fabricating a vacuum process bag allowing detection of air leaks in the bag, comprises the steps of forming a flexible polymer sheet and, applying a leak detection film on one face of the polymer sheet. The film may be applied by painting, printing or bonding the film on the face of the polymer sheet. The method may further comprise fabricating the film by extruding an oxygen permeable binder. The film may be fabricated by compounding an oxygen permeable binder and an oxygen sensitive material that changes in appearance when subjected to oxygen.
According to another method embodiment, a vacuum molding bag allowing detection of air leaks in the bag is fabricated by the steps comprising: forming a flexible polymer sheet; and, applying a leak detection film to one face of the polymer sheet. The leak detection film may be applied by painting, printing or bonding the film onto the face of the polymer sheet, or by co-extruding the film along with the polymer sheet.
According to a further method embodiment, a method of infusing a preform with resin, comprises the steps of: forming redundant vacuum chambers about the perform such that an inner vacuum chamber is disposed within an outer vacuum chamber; and if one of the vacuum chambers fails, the other vacuum chamber maintains vacuum integrity; evacuating the vacuum chambers such that the outer vacuum chamber has a pressure approximately equal to or greater than a pressure in the inner vacuum chamber; placing a leak detection film inside at least one of the inner and outer vacuum chambers; infusing resin into the preform while substantially maintaining the pressures in the vacuum chambers; and, detecting a leak in the at least one vacuum chamber by observing changes in the visual appearance of the leak detection film at the location of the leak.
Other features, benefits and advantages of the disclosed embodiments will become apparent from the following description of embodiments, when viewed in accordance with the attached drawings and appended claims.
a are sectional illustrations useful in explaining the removal of portions of the film extending beyond the vacuum seal.
b is a sectional illustration of an alternate embodiment in which the edge of the leak detection film is covered by a protective coating.
c is a sectional illustration of an alternate embodiment in which a leak detection film is positioned to detect leaks in a bag seal.
d is a sectional illustration of an alternate embodiment in which an edge of the leak detection film is positioned to detect leaks in a bag seal.
Referring first to
As used herein, “LDF” refers to a layer of material that includes a binder or matrix incorporating a gas sensitive material which may be in molecular form; the layer may be in the form of a film, coating or a membrane. The vacuum bag 26 is placed over the pre-form 22 and sealed around its edges. A vacuum is drawn within vacuum bag 26 in order to compact the pre-form 22 and/or draw resin from a source (not shown) into the bag 26, which is then infused into the pre-form 22. An air leak 30 in the vacuum bag 26 may result in air 32 entering the evacuated space within the bag 26. The air 32 exposes the LDF 28 to oxygen at the location of the air leak 30.
As will be discussed in more detail below, the LDF 28 includes an oxygen sensitive material that reacts to oxygen in the incoming air 32 by changing its physical appearance, which is emitted or reflected from the LDF 28 as light 35. This change occurs generally only in the area of the air leak 32. Since the vacuum bag 26 may be substantially transparent, operating personnel may detect the location of the leak 30 by observing the changes in appearance of the LDF 28 around the area of the leak 30. The change in appearance of the LDF 28 may comprise, without limitation, a change in the color of the film 28 surrounding the air leak 30 or a change in the intensity of a color.
For example, LDF 28 may react to an atmospheric gas (oxygen) by changing color or growing darker or brighter. This reaction may be temporary so that the bag 26 may appear as red, when it is exposed to the air before it is used. Then, the bag 26 may change to a different color when it is evacuated. In the event of a bag leak, the area around the leak will remain red, enabling an operator to quickly detect and repair the leak. Alternatively the LDF 28 may contain, without limitation, a phosphorescent that emits different wavelengths of light 35 near a leak, or that changes in its intensity around a leak.
Depending upon the materials used, the LDF 28 may be exposed to a light source 34 which directs light of a particular wavelength, such as UV, onto the film 28. The incident light causes the oxygen sensitive material around the area of the leak 32 to luminesce (light 35), which may include either florescence or phosphorescence. The LDF 28 may include, for example, without limitation, so-called “pressure sensitive paints” which change color based on the oxygen partial pressure near the paint. The paint comprises luminophore molecules suspended in an oxygen permeable binder that are excited by light of a particular wavelength (e.g. blue), and then return to the ground state by emitting light of a different wavelength (e.g. red) if oxygen is present. The presence of oxygen causes the luminophore molecules to return to their ground state through oxygen-quenching. The intensity of the red light emitted is inversely proportional to the surrounding partial pressure of the oxygen.
It should be noted here that the use of the LDF 28 to detect leaks in vacuum bags 26 is merely illustrative of a wide range of applications of the LDF 28 in industrial and manufacturing processes where it is desired to detect leaks or pressure gradients in gas impermeable, transparent membranes used to maintain a pressure differential. While the disclosed embodiments of the LDF employ materials that react to the presence of oxygen contained in the air, in order to detect leaks in vacuum bags, the LDFs may be used to detect the presence of various other gases, depending on the application. It should be further noted that the change in appearance of the LDF 28 may occur as the result of changes in light reflected from the surface of the LDF 28, the emission of light from the LDF 28 triggered by incident light of particular wavelengths or even chemical reactions resulting from the exposure of the LDF 28 to a particular gas.
Attention is now directed to
The outer margins of the bag 26 are attached to the seal 36 that forms an air tight boundary to tool 24 around the perimeter of the bag 26. Sealed bag 26 encloses a volume 29 between bag 26 and tool 24 which is supported on tool base 24a. One or more vacuum lines 38 may connect to the bag 26 in order to connect bag 26 to a vacuum source to evacuate the bag. In the case of a VARTM process, additional lines (not shown) may be used to connect the bag 26 with a source of resin (not shown) that is drawn into the bag 26 by the vacuum.
As best seen in
As previously described, depending upon the materials used as the oxygen sensitive material in the LDF 28, a leak 30 in the bag 26 allows air to enter the bag 26 which exposes the LDF 28 to oxygen in the area surrounding the leak 30. The oxygen sensitive material reacts to the presence of the entering air by changing color or changing the intensity of its current color. Other physical changes in the LDF 30 that are visibly detectable may be possible, depending upon the materials used. The degree of change in the physical appearance (color) may depend upon the pressure of the air (and thus the oxygen) entering the leak 30. Generally, the change in physical appearance of the LDF 28 around the air leak 30 will diminish with increasing distance from the air leak 30. Thus, as shown in
As previously described, the leak detecting film 28 may comprise materials similar to known materials referred to as pressure sensitive paints which comprise two primary parts: an oxygen-sensitive florescent molecule and an oxygen-permeable binder. The detection process is based on the sensitivity of the luminescent molecules to the presence of oxygen. When a luminescent molecule absorbs a photon, it is excited to an upper singlet energy state. The molecule then typically recovers to the ground state by the admission of a photon of a longer wavelength.
In some materials, oxygen can interact with the molecules such that the transition to the ground state is without radiation; this process is known as oxygen quenching. The rate at which these two processes compete may depend upon the partial pressure of the oxygen present, with a higher oxygen pressure quenching the molecule to a greater extent, thus diminishing the intensity of the light. It should also be noted here that the luminescence intensity of the LDF 28 at a given point may also a function of other factors. For example, the luminescence intensity may depend on variations in the spatial distribution of the illumination over the LDF 28, the level of concentration of the luminospheres, the thickness of the LDF 28 and the sensitivity of any cameras that may be used to detect visual changes in the LDF 28.
Depending upon the particular materials used in the LDF 28, specialized recording instruments may not be necessary in order to detect luminescent emissions produced by the oxygen sensitive molecules. For example, by doping the materials in the film 28 with adequate substances, a luminescence emission in the visible range may be obtained which is oxygen sensitive.
Where the LDF 28a is adhered directly to the inside face of the bag 26, it may be important to assure that the film 28a does not extend beyond the seal 36. For example, as shown in
c illustrates an alternate embodiment in which a short length of LDF 28c is positioned between the bag 26 and the tool 24, immediately adjacent the bag seal 36. Positioning LDF 28c across the seal 36 allows an operator to detect leaks in the seal 36, since a leak in the seal 36 may be detected by the LDF 28 which will emit light 35 near the edge of the seal 36. The LDF 28c may be used with or without a separate LDF 28 employed to detect leaks in the bag 26. The oxygen sensitive material used in the LDF 28c may produce a color different from the color emitted by an LDF 28 used to detect leaks in the bag 26, thus allowing an operator to distinguish between leaks in the seal 36 and leaks in the bag 26. It should be noted here that the LDF 28c need not be sealed against either the bag 26 or the tool 24.
d illustrates an alternate embodiment which may allow detection of leaks in the seal 36. The edge 33 of an LDF 28 extends from the inner surface of the bag adjacent the seal 36, downwardly to the tool 24, thereby effectively covering the edge of the seal 36. The edge 33 need not be sealed to the tool 24. A leak in the seal 36 may result in light 35 being emitted or reflected from the LDF 28 near the seal 36, thereby alerting an operator that a leak may be present in or near the seal 36.
Where the LDF 28a is coextruded with the bag 26 or is bonded to the bag 26, it may be possible to cut away and remove the marginal portions of the LDF 28a.
The LDF 28 may be employed to detect leaks in multiple vacuum bags or bag assemblies. For example, a double bag molding assembly 20a is show in
Attention is now directed to
Next, at step 80, the LDF 28 may be applied to the bag 26 by any of several processes. First, the LDF 28 may be coextruded with the bag, as shown at step 82. Alternatively, the LDF 28 may be bonded directly to the bag 26 as shown at step 84. Finally, the LDF 28 may be applied to the bag 26 either by painting or printing as shown at step 86. The bag 26 having the LDF 28 applied thereto is cut to size at step 88 and then installed over the pre-form 22 and tool 24, and sealed at step 90.
Attention is now directed to
Referring now to
Each of the processes of method 106 may be performed or carried out by a system integrator, a third party, and/or an operator (e.g., a customer). For the purposes of this description, a system integrator may include without limitation any number of aircraft manufacturers and major-system subcontractors; a third party may include without limitation any number of venders, subcontractors, and suppliers; and an operator may be an airline, leasing company, military entity, service organization, and so on.
As shown in
The apparatus embodied herein may be employed during any one or more of the stages of the production and service method 106. For example, components or subassemblies corresponding to production process 112 may be fabricated or manufactured in a manner similar to components or subassemblies produced while the aircraft 122 is in service. Also, one or more apparatus embodiments may be utilized during the production stages 112 and 114, for example, by substantially expediting assembly of or reducing the cost of an aircraft 122. Similarly, one or more apparatus embodiments may be utilized while the aircraft 122 is in service, for example and without limitation, to maintenance and service 120.
A device for indicating the location of an air leak in a vacuum bag used in processing parts is presented. The device comprises a film including oxygen sensitive material inside of and extending across the vacuum bag, the oxygen sensitive material changing in physical appearance at the general location of an air leak in the vacuum bag. In one illustrative example, the film includes an oxygen permeable binder, and the oxygen sensitive material is held in the oxygen permeable binder. In another illustrative example, the film is bonded to an inside face of the vacuum bag. In another illustrative example, the film is formed from a flexible polymer. In one illustrative example, the oxygen sensitive material includes light sensitive nanoparticles responsive to light of a predetermined wavelength for emitting light indicating the location of the air leak in the vacuum bag. In another illustrative example, the oxygen sensitive material may be excited by light of a preselected wavelength to luminesce, and the intensity of the luminescence changes due the presence of oxygen caused by the air leak. In another illustrative example, the oxygen sensitive material may be excited by light of a preselected wavelength to luminesce, and the intensity of the luminescence changes due the presence of oxygen caused by the air leak, wherein the film includes a dye for coloring the luminescence produced by the oxygen sensitive material. In yet another illustrative example, the film is substantially coextensive with the region of the vacuum bag that is subjected to a vacuum. In another illustrative example, the oxygen sensitive material includes pressure sensitive luminophores. In a further illustrative example, the parts include a vehicle subassembly. In one illustrative example, the vacuum bag is used to process aircraft subassemblies.
A vacuum bag assembly used in bonding parts together is presented. The vacuum bag assembly comprises a vacuum bag covering at least one of the parts and defining a space in which a vacuum may be drawn to assist in bonding the parts; and a leak detection film inside of and extending across the vacuum bag, the leak detection film including oxygen sensitive material that changes in physical appearance at the general location of an air leak in the vacuum bag. In one illustrative example, the film includes an oxygen permeable binder, wherein the oxygen sensitive material is held in the oxygen permeable binder. In another illustrative example, the leak detection film is bonded to an inside face of the vacuum bag. In a further illustrative example, the leak detection film is formed from a flexible polymer. In yet another illustrative example, the oxygen sensitive material includes light sensitive nanoparticles responsive to light of a predetermined wavelength for emitting light indicating the location of an air leak in the vacuum bag. In a further illustrative example, the oxygen sensitive material may be excited by light of a preselected wavelength to luminesce. In an illustrative example, the oxygen sensitive material may be excited by light of a preselected wavelength to luminesce, and the leak detection film includes a dye for coloring the luminescence. In an illustrative example, the leak detection film is substantially coextensive with the region of the vacuum bag that is subjected to a vacuum. In another illustrative example, the oxygen sensitive material includes pressure sensitive luminophores. In one illustrative example, the parts form part of a vehicle. In an illustrative example, the parts form an aerospace vehicle subassembly.
A device for detecting an air leak in a vacuum bag used in fabricating composite parts is presented. The device comprises a film inside of and substantially coextensive with the area of the bag subjected to a vacuum, the film including an oxygen permeable binder and an oxygen sensitive material held in the binder, the oxygen sensitive material having at least one visual characteristic that changes in the presence of oxygen introduced into the vacuum bag by the air leak. In one illustrative example, the film includes a coating formed on the inside face of the vacuum bag. In another illustrative example, the oxygen sensitive material includes light sensitive nanoparticles responsive to light of a predetermined wavelength for emitting light indicating the location of the air leak. In a further illustrative example, the oxygen sensitive material may be excited by light of a preselected wavelength to luminesce, wherein the presence of oxygen caused by the air leak produces a change in the luminescence. In another illustrative example, the oxygen sensitive material may be excited by light of a preselected wavelength to luminesce, wherein the presence of oxygen caused by the air leak produces a change in the luminescence, and the film includes a dye for coloring the luminescence. In an illustrative example, the oxygen sensitive material includes pressure sensitive luminophores.
In one illustrative example, the device may be used during the fabrication of parts of a vehicle. In one illustrative example, the device may be used during the fabrication of an aircraft subassembly.
A vacuum molding bag is presented, the vacuum molding bag comprising a flexible, substantially transparent polymer sheet having an inside face and an outside face; and a film on the inside face of the polymer sheet, the film including an oxygen permeable binder and an oxygen sensitive material held in the binder, the oxygen sensitive material exhibiting a change in physical appearance in the area of an air leak in the vacuum molding bag to indicate the location of the air leak. In an illustrative example, portions of the film are removable from the polymer sheet. In an illustrative example, portions of the film are removable from the polymer sheet and the removable portions form a grid pattern. In one illustrative example, the oxygen sensitive material includes light sensitive nanoparticles responsive to light of a predetermined wavelength for emitting light indicating the location of an air leak in the vacuum molding bag. In another illustrative example, the oxygen sensitive material may be excited by light of a preselected wavelength to luminesce, and the presence of oxygen caused by the air leak produces a change in the luminescence. In another illustrative example, the film includes a dye for coloring the luminescence. In a further illustrative example, the film is substantially coextensive with the region of the vacuum molding bag that is subjected to a vacuum. In an illustrative example, the oxygen sensitive material includes pressure sensitive luminophores.
In one illustrative example, the vacuum molding bag is used to fabricate parts of a vehicle. In another illustrative example, the vacuum molding bag is used to fabricate an aircraft subassembly.
A device for detecting gas leaks in a gas impermeable, transparent membrane for use in manufacturing and industrial processes is presented. The device comprises a film extending across the membrane for providing a visual indication of the location of a gas leak in the membrane. In one illustrative example, the film is configured to change in appearance in the area of the gas leak. In one illustrative example, the film is configured to change in appearance in the area of the gas leak and the film includes a gas permeable binder configured to visually react to the presence of a gas reaching the film through the leak. In an illustrative example, the film is configured to change in appearance in the area of the gas leak, wherein the film is attached to the membrane. In an illustrative example, the film is configured to change in appearance in the area of the gas leak, wherein the film is substantially coextensive with an area on the membrane over which leaks are to be detected. In another illustrative example, the film is configured to change in appearance in the area of the gas leak the film includes a gas permeable binder configured to visually react to the presence of a gas reaching the film through the leak, wherein the gas permeable binder includes pressure sensitive luminophores. In another illustrative example, the film is configured to change in appearance in the area of the gas leak the film includes a gas permeable binder configured to visually react to the presence of a gas reaching the film through the leak, wherein the gas permeable binder includes oxygen sensitive material.
In one illustrative example, the device is used to fabricate parts of a vehicle. In one illustrative example, the device is used to fabricate an aircraft subassembly.
A method of fabricating a vacuum process bag allowing detection of air leaks in the bag is presented. The method comprises forming a flexible polymer sheet; and, applying a leak detection film on one face of the flexible polymer sheet. In one illustrative example, the step of applying the leak detection film on the one face of the flexible polymer sheet is performed by painting the leak detection film on the one face of the flexible polymer sheet. In another illustrative example, the method further comprises the step of fabricating the leak detection film by extruding an oxygen permeable binder.
In a further illustrative example, steps of forming the flexible polymer sheet and applying the leak detection film on the one face of the flexible polymer sheet are performed substantially simultaneously by co-extruding the flexible polymer sheet and the leak detection film. In another illustrative example, the step of applying the leak detection film on the one face of the flexible polymer sheet is performed by bonding the leak detection film to the one face of the flexible polymer sheet. In a further illustrative example, the method further comprises the step of fabricating the leak detection film by compounding an oxygen permeable binder and an oxygen sensitive material that changes in appearance when subjected to oxygen.
A vacuum process bag used to produce parts for vehicles fabricated by a process comprising forming a flexible polymer sheet; and, applying a leak detection film on one face of the polymer sheet. A vacuum process bag used to produce aircraft subassemblies fabricated by a process comprising forming a flexible polymer sheet; and, applying a leak detection film on one face of the polymer sheet. A method of infusing a preform with resin, comprising the steps of forming redundant vacuum chambers about the perform such that—an inner vacuum chamber is disposed within an outer vacuum chamber; and if one of the vacuum chambers fails, the other vacuum chamber maintains vacuum integrity; evacuating the vacuum chambers such that the outer vacuum chamber has a pressure approximately equal to or greater than a pressure in the inner vacuum chamber; placing a leak detection film inside at least one of the inner and outer vacuum chambers; infusing resin into the preform while substantially maintaining the pressures in the vacuum chambers; and, detecting a leak in the at least one vacuum chamber by observing changes in the visual appearance of the leak detection film at the location of the leak. In one illustrative example, the step of placing the leak detection film inside the at least one of the inner and outer vacuum chambers includes placing the leak detection film inside each of the inner and outer vacuum chambers. In another illustrative example, the method further comprises the step of spreading the leak detection film over the perform. In another illustrative example, the method further comprises the step of attaching the leak detection film to a face of the at least one vacuum chamber. In a further illustrative example, the step of detecting the leak in the at least one vacuum chamber by observing changes in the visual appearance of the leak detection film at the location of the leak includes generating luminescence in the leak detection film, and detecting changes in the intensity of the luminescence caused by a leak in the at least one vacuum chamber. In another illustrative example, the step of detecting the leak in the at least one vacuum chamber by observing changes in the visual appearance of the leak detection film at the location of the leak includes generating luminescence in the leak detection film, and detecting changes in the intensity of the luminescence caused by a leak in the at least one vacuum chamber, wherein generating the luminescence includes illuminating the leak detection film bag with light having a wavelength that causes the leak detection film to luminesce. In another illustrative example, the preform is an aircraft subassembly.
Air leaks in a vacuum bag are detected using a leak detection film covering the inside face of the bag. The film includes a gas permeable binder carrying oxygen sensitive material that changes in physical appearance at the location of an air leak. The film may be adhered to the inside face of the bag or may form a separate membrane that is placed over a layup being molded in the bag. The film may be illuminated with light having a wavelength selected to cause the film to luminesce.
Although the embodiments of this disclosure have been described with respect to certain exemplary embodiments, it is to be understood that the specific embodiments are for purposes of illustration and not limitation, as other variations will occur to those of skill in the art.
This application is a continuation of patent application Ser. No. 12/906,489, filed Oct. 18, 2010; which is a divisional of patent application Ser. No. 11/829,900, filed Jul. 28, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,849,729, issued Dec. 14, 2010; all of which claim the benefit of Provisional U.S. Patent Application No. 60/876,928 filed Dec. 22, 2006.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2374894 | Pioch et al. | May 1945 | A |
2679278 | Clark | May 1954 | A |
3101290 | Frederic et al. | Aug 1963 | A |
3739166 | Anderson | Jun 1973 | A |
3967996 | Kamov et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
3983282 | Seemann, III | Sep 1976 | A |
4015035 | Blad et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4016022 | Browning et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4049484 | Priest et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4120632 | Stoeberl | Oct 1978 | A |
4132755 | Johnson | Jan 1979 | A |
4208238 | August et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4238539 | Yates et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4287015 | Danner, Jr. | Sep 1981 | A |
4476797 | Ivanov et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4491081 | Ivanov | Jan 1985 | A |
4491493 | Eaton | Jan 1985 | A |
4496412 | Ritter | Jan 1985 | A |
4548859 | Kline et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4554036 | Newsom | Nov 1985 | A |
4564543 | Ritter | Jan 1986 | A |
4588626 | Cologna et al. | May 1986 | A |
4622091 | Letterman | Nov 1986 | A |
4698115 | Dodds | Oct 1987 | A |
4741943 | Hunt | May 1988 | A |
4824513 | Dodds | Apr 1989 | A |
4875962 | Breakspear | Oct 1989 | A |
4902215 | Seemann, III | Feb 1990 | A |
4917353 | Riley | Apr 1990 | A |
4934199 | Avila et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4942013 | Palmer et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4945488 | Carver et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4961799 | Cologna et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4987700 | Westerman et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5033014 | Carver et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5034254 | Cologna et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5052906 | Seemann | Oct 1991 | A |
5071338 | Dublinski et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5087193 | Herbert, Jr. | Feb 1992 | A |
5116216 | Cochran et al. | May 1992 | A |
5123985 | Evans et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5129813 | Shepherd | Jul 1992 | A |
5167742 | Peters | Dec 1992 | A |
5180046 | Hutton et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5190611 | Cologna et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5207541 | Westerman et al. | May 1993 | A |
5217669 | Dublinski et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5290386 | Trudeau | Mar 1994 | A |
5316462 | Seemann | May 1994 | A |
5350614 | Chase et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5359887 | Schwab et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5364584 | Imanara et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5427518 | Morizot et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5427725 | White et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5429326 | Garesche et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5439635 | Seemann | Aug 1995 | A |
5441692 | Taricco | Aug 1995 | A |
5514232 | Burns | May 1996 | A |
5576030 | Hooper | Nov 1996 | A |
5601852 | Seemann | Feb 1997 | A |
5612492 | Schwab et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5667881 | Rasmussen et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5683646 | Reiling, Jr. | Nov 1997 | A |
5702663 | Seemann | Dec 1997 | A |
5721034 | Seemann, III et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5759325 | Davis | Jun 1998 | A |
5780721 | Levens | Jul 1998 | A |
5820894 | Kreutzer | Oct 1998 | A |
5879489 | Burns et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5882756 | Alston et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5904972 | Tunis, III et al. | May 1999 | A |
5932256 | Mandish | Aug 1999 | A |
5939013 | Han et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5954898 | McKague et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5958325 | Seemann, III et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6090335 | McClure et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6096164 | Benson et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6206067 | Kociemba et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6211497 | Matsen et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6284089 | Anderson et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6298896 | Sherrill et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6299819 | Han | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6355203 | Charmes et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6391246 | Shiraishi et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6391436 | Xu et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6406659 | Lang et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6408517 | Lehmker et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6461551 | Mandish | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6510977 | Hertz | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6533985 | Smith | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6551091 | Bryant et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6575218 | Burns et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6579418 | Lindsay et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6589472 | Benson et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6638466 | Abbott | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6689438 | Kennedy et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6692681 | Lunde | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6696690 | Benne | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6761783 | Keller et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6797390 | Asai et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6808143 | Munk et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6830079 | Ahrens et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6860957 | Sana et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6919039 | Lang et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7029267 | Caron | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7127950 | Fonov et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7137182 | Nelson | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7141191 | Engwall et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7186367 | Hou et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7228611 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7294220 | Anderson | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7306450 | Hanson | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7398586 | Prichard et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7398698 | Griess et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7413694 | Waldrop, III et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7503368 | Chapman et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7521105 | Bech et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7527759 | Lee et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7534615 | Havens | May 2009 | B2 |
7622066 | Brustad et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7624488 | Lum et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7628879 | Ackerman | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7655168 | Jones et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7762122 | Advani et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7849729 | Miller et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7871040 | Lee et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7963038 | Schmitz | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7964049 | Kapur et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8003034 | Oldani et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8114673 | Mills et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8333864 | Brennan et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8409396 | Bech et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8438909 | Miller et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
20020060018 | Lindsay et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20030082321 | Kennedy et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030175511 | Asai et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040026025 | Sana et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040031567 | Engelbart et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040258562 | Mills et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050086916 | Caron | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050102814 | Anderson et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050112772 | Farone et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050161154 | Anderson | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050230055 | Sana et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050236735 | Oldani et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050253309 | Hou et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060108058 | Chapman et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060118235 | Lum et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060121613 | Havens | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070029527 | Mills et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070107189 | Prichard et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070272582 | Lau | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070289246 | Schmitz | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080023015 | Arnold et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080111024 | Lee et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080148817 | Miller et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080178996 | Tada et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080308674 | Frantz et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090120562 | Tsotsis et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090145545 | Brennan et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090148647 | Jones et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090211698 | McCowin | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090273107 | Advani et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090320292 | Brennan et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100011580 | Brennan et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100012260 | Brennan et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100078126 | Brennan et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100170326 | Miller et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110079174 | Miller et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110259086 | Harris et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110259515 | Rotter et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20130011586 | Landry et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130042978 | Brennan et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102004046520 | Apr 2005 | DE |
0230682 | Aug 1987 | EP |
0271263 | Jun 1988 | EP |
0319449 | Jun 1989 | EP |
0348831 | Jan 1990 | EP |
0391641 | Oct 1990 | EP |
0391641 | Aug 1994 | EP |
0629497 | Dec 1994 | EP |
0816438 | Jan 1998 | EP |
1038656 | Sep 2000 | EP |
1780120 | May 2007 | EP |
1995044 | Nov 2008 | EP |
1995045 | Nov 2008 | EP |
2067611 | Jun 2009 | EP |
2383106 | Nov 2011 | EP |
2383559 | Nov 2011 | EP |
2444240 | Apr 2012 | EP |
2478848 | Sep 2011 | GB |
60252235 | Dec 1985 | JP |
62259059 | Nov 1987 | JP |
H06242087 | Sep 1994 | JP |
2002254429 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2004309379 | Nov 2004 | JP |
19970058260 | Nov 1997 | KR |
WO9322127 | Nov 1993 | WO |
WO0176892 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO02099416 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO03021252 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO2004031321 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO2004057120 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2004078461 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO2005056391 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO2005059500 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO2006110627 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO2006118692 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO2008054499 | May 2008 | WO |
WO2008088435 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO2010025376 | Mar 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Final Office Action, dated Jul. 29, 2013, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/200,882, 10 pages. |
Final Office Action, dated Aug. 15, 2013, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/764,202, 16 pages. |
Material Safety Data Sheet for Potassium indigotetrasulfonate, Sigma-Aldric Corporation, Dec. 13, 2012, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Dec. 6, 2013, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/764,202, 20 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Jan. 17, 2014, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/952,222, 37 pages. |
European Search Report dated Dec. 2, 2013 regarding Application No. EP09792061.5-1753, 6 pages. |
European Search Report dated Mar. 2, 2009 regarding Application No. EP08171011 (EP2067611), 2 pages. |
European Search Report, dated Sep. 30, 2011, regarding Application No. EP11160843 (EP2383559), 7 pages. |
European Search Report dated Sep. 15, 2011 regarding Application No. EP11160866 (EP2383106), 4 pages. |
European Search Report dated Mar. 2, 2012 regarding Application No. EP12151305 (EP2444240), 2 pages. |
UK Intellectual Property Office Search Report dated Jul. 15, 2011 regarding Application No. GB1104472.4 (GB2478848), 5 pages. |
International Search Report dated May 29, 2008 regarding Application No. PCT/US2007/023455 (WO2008088435), 3 pages. |
International Search Report dated Feb. 1, 2010 regarding Application No. PCT/US2009/055378 (WO2010025376), 3 pages. |
Korean Intellectual Property Office Notice of Office Action dated Jun. 11, 2010, regarding Application No. 200847564, 9 pages. |
Korean Intellectual Property Office Notice of Office Action dated Jun. 21, 2010, regarding Application No. 200847566, 14 pages. |
Buckingham et al., “Automating the manufacture of composite broadgoods,” Composites Part A, vol. 27A, No. 3, Mar. 1996, pp. 191-200. |
Campbell (Ed.), “Ply Collation: A Major Cost Driver,” In: Manufacturing Processes for Advanced Composites, Elsevier Advanced Technology, Oxford, UK, pp. 131-173, 2004. |
El Amin, “Nano ink indicates safety breach in food packaging,” dated Nov. 14, 2006, 2 pages. Retrieved from http://www.foodproductiondaily.com/Quality-Safety/Nano-ink-indicates-safety-breach-in-food-packaging. |
Jayaweera et al., “Adaptive robotic assembly of compliant aero-structure components,” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 23, No. 2, Jan. 2007, pp. 180-194. |
Lee et al., “Novel UV-Activated Colorimetric Oxygen Indicator,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 17, No. 10, May 2005, pp. 2744-2751. |
Mills et al., “UV-Activated Luminescence/Colourimetric O2 Indicator,” International Journal of Photoenergy, vol. 2008, 2008, 6 pages. |
Setnescu et al., “Polymer Films Doped with Colorants as Oxygen Sensitive Materials,” Journal of Optoelectrics and Advanced Materials, vol. 8, No. 2, Apr. 2006, pp. 682-686. |
Sieberg et al., “An advanced FRP manufacturing technique asserts itself: Practical experience with the vacuum injection process,” Studiedag Vakuuminjecteren, XP002169062, Oct. 27, 1998, pp. 13-19. (German-language article, English translation attached). |
Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2011 regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/751,928, 19 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Jun. 23, 2011 regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/751,928, 11 pages. |
USPTO Office Action dated Jan. 19, 2012 regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/751,928, 13 pages. |
Final Office Action, dated Jun. 20, 2012, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/751,928, 20 pages. |
Office Action dated Mar. 10, 2010 regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/829,900, 10 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 30, 2010 regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/829,900, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 21, 2012, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/725,380, 19 pages. |
Office Action dated Feb. 21, 2012 regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/906,489, 18 pages. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 13, 2012, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/906,489, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 14, 2012, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/906,489, 34 pages. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jan. 8, 2013, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/906,489, 13 pages. |
Office Action dated Jun. 2, 2010 regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/751,931, 15 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Aug. 11, 2010, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/751,931, 29 pages. |
Office Action dated May 20, 2011, USPTO regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/751,931, 31 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Sep. 28, 2011, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/751,931, 24 pages. |
Office Action dated Oct. 26, 2010, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/952,222, 20 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Apr. 15, 2011 regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/952,222, 20 pages. |
Office Action dated Oct. 3, 2011, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/952,222, 21 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Apr. 30, 2012, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/952,222, 25 pages. |
Office Action, dated Oct. 24, 2012, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/952,222, 39 pages. |
Office Action dated May 17, 2010, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/200,882, 9 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Oct. 26, 2010, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/200,882, 8 pages. |
Office Action dated Mar. 21, 2013, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/200,882, 47 pages. |
Office Action dated Jul. 27, 2010, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/242,477, 13 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Dec. 2, 2010, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/242,477, 15 pages. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jul. 5, 2012, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/242,477, 9 pages. |
Office Action, dated Apr. 26, 2012, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/764,202, 13 pages. |
Final Office Action, dated Nov. 16, 2012, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/764,202, 31 pages. |
Office Action dated Nov. 14, 2011, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/768,007, 20 pages. |
Final Office Action, dated May 3, 2012, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/768,007, 29 pages. |
Notice of Allowance, dated May 10, 2013, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/751,931, 49 pages. |
Office Action, dated May 9, 2013, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/952,222, 27 pages. |
Office Action, dated Mar. 26, 2013, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 13/657,137, 41 pages. |
Office Action, dated Apr. 1, 2013, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/764,202, 38 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 17, 2014, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/952,222, 15 pages. |
Office Action, dated May 22, 2014, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/768,007, 67 pages. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 3, 2014, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/768,007, 8 pages. |
European Patent Office Communication, dated Feb. 19, 2015, regarding Application No. EP12151305.5, 5 pages. |
Campbell, “Adhesive Bonding and Integrally Cocured Structure,” In: Manufacturing Processes for Advanced Composites, Elsevier Advanced Technology, Oxford, UK, Jan. 2004, pp. 242-245. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130239875 A1 | Sep 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60876928 | Dec 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11829900 | Jul 2007 | US |
Child | 12906489 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12906489 | Oct 2010 | US |
Child | 13892916 | US |