The subject matter disclosed herein generally relates to detection of leaks and more particularly to the detection of coolant leaks into a stator liquid cooling system in turbine generators.
Large turbine generators are typically cooled with a light density gas. Hydrogen (H2) has been widely used as a coolant due to its desirable thermophysical properties including low windage friction, high heat dissipation capability and high resistance to corona discharge when compared to other cooling gas options. Additionally, H2 has the advantage of being readily accessible and inexpensive.
Among H2 cooled generators there is a type of liquid cooled generators whose inner spaces are cooled with H2 while the stator windings are cooled with a liquid coolant. The stator windings typically include a plurality of hollow copper strands which serve as conduits for the liquid coolant. A typical stator winding includes at least one stator bar coupled to a bar clip and a header coupled to a source of liquid coolant which is conveyed by a pipe through a hydraulic connection to the bar clip. Liquid coolant flows from an inlet coolant header into the flow passages formed by the plethora of hollow copper strands within the stator bar and then flows outwardly into an outlet coolant header for flow into a reservoir. The liquid coolant, such as water, is supplied to the windings via a closed loop system including a heat exchanger and a deionizer.
Liquid cooled generators offer high efficiency, exceptional reliability, quick and simple installation and minimal maintenance costs. However, during operation, the liquid cooled stator windings are subject to an environment of thermal shocks, cyclic duty, corrosion, mechanical vibrations, and electromagnetic stresses which may give rise to the potential for leaks. Leaks in liquid cooled stator windings may originate at any of a number of components, such as copper tubing, pipes, piping connections, among others.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,353,691 teaches a turbine generator leak detection method involving a flow monitoring system that detects H2 leaking into a water cooling system. A variety of methods of leak detection have been used when the leakage is higher than recommended. Among conventional leak test methods, one method involves sniffing detection of H2 in the water tank vent of the SLCS. If a leak is detected, a balloon (bag) test may be conducted to determine the leakage rate. However, the leak locale is difficult to determine during the operation, or during outage service using this approach.
Another method of detecting leaks is to perform pressure decay, and vacuum decay tests to confirm that the stator winding is capable of holding pressure and vacuum. If the pressure within the stator winding falls too rapidly after the stator winding has been pressurized with compressed air, or if the pressure rises too rapidly after air has been evacuated, then a leak that requires further attention is indicated.
If a leak is indicated by pressure and/or vacuum decay testing; then helium tracer gas testing may be used. Helium tracer gas may be performed around all joints such as connection ring to pipes, clip to stator braze joint, water or hydrogen cooled high voltage bushings and a long list of places of interest. Helium tracer gas testing has the disadvantage that it is time-consuming for inspecting the entire winding and requires access to the whole winding. To detect small leaks, the sniffer detector must be brought within 2 to 3 inches of the leak. Because it is nearly impossible to cover every square inch of the winding, tracer test techniques are used to test only the most probable leak sites. Such testing cannot provide confidence that the entire winding is leak-tight.
Conventional leak detection methods are time consuming and, in some cases, may miss some of the leaks. A stator winding that passes a conventional leak test is not guaranteed to be leak free. Additionally, each cycle of the testing requires monitoring for at least 24 hours, if not days, as more than hundreds of those connection and joints may be leak locales. Additionally, conventional methods of leak detection require the detector to be in close proximity to the source of the leak and rely on educated or experienced guesses. This takes considerable time to implement. These methods do not provide a remote, sensitive, accurate, fast detection capability.
The disclosure provides methods and systems and apparatus for the remote, sensitive, accurate, safe, and fast detection of leak locales from a stator winding of an SLCS of a liquid cooled turbine generator. The methods disclosed are safe from a health, environmental and safety point of view and avoid corrosion of generator components.
In accordance with one exemplary non-limiting embodiment, the invention relates to a method and apparatus for detecting a leak locale in an SLCS of a liquid cooled generator. The apparatus includes a subsystem for introducing a pressurized non-corrosive gas having an infrared absorption spectrum into a plurality of stator windings of the SLCS of the liquid cooled generator. The apparatus further includes an imaging component adapted to detect radiation at the infrared absorption spectrum of the pressurized non-corrosive gas and has a filter that filters wavelengths in a range encompassing the infrared absorption spectrum of the non-corrosive gas. The imaging device may be distally disposed in the vicinity of the plurality of stator windings.
In another embodiment, the SLCS is drained, and the stator windings of the SLCS are purged with dry air. CO2 is then introduced into the stator winding of the SLCS and pressurized up to more than 15 psig, more preferably up to 30 psig or 45 psig.
In another embodiment, a system for detecting a gas leak locale in a stator winding of an SLCS of a liquid cooled generator is provided. The system includes a source of tracer gas and a subsystem for introducing the tracer gas into the stator windings of the SLCS. The system further includes an infrared imaging device adapted to display an image of the tracer gas. The system may include a source of a mixture of gas with dry air.
In another embodiment, a method for detecting a leak locale of a liquid coolant from an SLCS in a generator is provided. The method includes disposing an infrared imaging system having a cold detector response of between 3 μm to 5 μm with a field of view encompassing at least a portion of the generator. The method includes disconnecting a plurality of stator windings from the SLCS. Thereafter a tracer gas is introduced into the stator windings, the tracer gas having an absorption spectrum of between 3 μm and 5 μm. The method includes filtering the radiation received by the infrared imaging system in the absorption spectrum of the tracer gas, and displaying an image of tracer gas leaking from the stator windings.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the following more detailed description of the preferred embodiment, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings which illustrate, by way of example, the principles of certain aspects of the invention.
Aspects of the present disclosure include a system for detecting leaks in an SLCS of a liquid cooled turbine generator through the introduction of an environmentally safe non-corrosive tracer gas into the stator windings that are disconnected from the SLCS during the detection test. An infrared imaging device adapted to display an image of the escaping tracer gas is provided. The utility of the present disclosure is amplified when used to detect leaks in the stator windings of the SLCS where hundreds of joints may be the sources of potential leaks.
Illustrated in
Referring again to
In one embodiment, detection of a leak locale of the SLCS 15 may start with the section of the SLCS 15 that houses the stator windings 16 which extend outside of the liquid cooled turbine generator 11. In this embodiment, the leak detection system 10 includes a source 40 of tracer gas that is coupled to the interior of the stator windings 16 of the SLCS 15. Tracer gas flows through a conduit 45 having a control valve 50 that controls the amount and pressure of tracer gas introduced into the stator windings 16 of the SLCS 15. The tracer gas is preferably cooled or heated several degrees Celsius, and is environmentally friendly and non-corrosive. The tracer gas may be introduced into the stator windings 16 at a rate of about 24 liters per second, which corresponds to a rate of 4.7 liters/second per tracer gas cylinder. The tracer gas may fill the internal volume of the stator windings 16. The tracer gas should be environmentally safe from the point of view of toxicity and have the least greenhouse effect. Additionally, the tracer gas should not cause corrosive damage to the inner walls of pipes or the hollowed copper strands of stator windings 16. The tracer gas should also have an appropriate density ranging from 0.5 to 2.5 g/liter.
The infrared imaging device 30, which may include the image screen 31 and the detection device 32, is adapted to visualize the absorptive and emissive properties of tracer gases allowing the user the ability to discern the tracer gas from its host environment. The filter 35 is designed to transmit in an IR spectral region that is coincident in wavelength with vibrational/rotational energy transitions of the molecular bonds of the tracer gas. These transitions are typically strongly coupled to the field via dipole moment changes in the molecule and are common to many types of gases and vapors. The detector of the infrared imaging device 30 may be cooled to 77° K. or approximately −196° C. in an Integrated Cooler Detector Assembly (or Integrated Dewar Cooler Assembly, IDCA), to increase the sensitivity of remote imaging of tracer gases. The thermal sensitivity is typically less than 20 mK, and preferably less than 14 mK. The filter 35 may be mounted on an imaging lens 36, or behind the imaging lens 36, or inside the IDCA assembly for increased versatility or increased sensitivity. The filter 35 has a mid-wavelength of 3.9 to 4.6 microns, or more preferably 4.1 μm to 4.5 μm. The infrared imaging device 30 may be calibrated with temperature and tuned with the largest image contrast possible using modes of absorption, reflection or scattering so that the exact pressure, flow rate and temperature gradient of leaking tracer gas can be identified from varying detection distances. The infrared imaging device 30 may be portable and capable of scanning large sections of stator windings 16 of the SLCS 15. After completion of leak detection in the stator windings 16, the external portion of the SLCS 15 may be examined for additional leak locations. If the infrared imaging device 30 is directed at the stator windings 16 without a tracer gas leak, then objects in the field of view will emit and reflect infrared radiation through the filter 35 of the infrared imaging device 30, and no discernible tracer gas cloud would be displayed. If there is a leak within the field of view 55 of the infrared imaging device 30 such as at leak point 60, a leak gas cloud 65 will be generated between the SLCS 15 and the infrared imaging device 30. The leak gas cloud 65 will absorb radiation in the band pass range of the filter 35, and consequently the amount of radiation passing through the leak gas cloud 65 and returning to the cold detector will be reduced, thereby making the leak gas cloud 65 visible through image screen 31 of the infrared imaging device 30. If there is a leak outside of the field of view 55 of the infrared imaging device 30, such as at leak point 70, portions of a leak gas cloud 75 would still be detected by moving the infrared imaging device 30.
The infrared imaging device 30 may also be mounted on a support 80. The infrared imaging device 30 may be coupled to an image analyzer 85, which in turn may be coupled to a control system 90. The infrared imaging device 30 may be moved periodically or continuously, to automatically detect leaks during the outage period. The infrared imaging device 30, the image analyzer 85 and the control system 90 may be separate components or an integrated assembly.
The infrared imaging device 30 may have a mountable 25 mm (˜1 inch) imaging lens 36 to enable focusing of stator windings 16 of the SLCS 15 of the liquid cooled turbine generator 11 from a distance of 3 feet to 50 feet. Distances of greater than 50 feet may require mounting an imaging lens 36 of 2 inches or more. The resulting field of view 55 may allow the detection of hundreds of potential leak locales at the braze joints and pipe joints of the SLCS 15 in a single view. A preferred mode of practice also includes positioning the imaging lens 36 perpendicular to the direction of potential tracer gas cloud, that is, parallel to the direction of pipeline length direction. The other preferred mode of practice includes the placement of a heated ultra-thin sheet whose temperature is 5-20° C./° F. higher than that of atmosphere surrounding the suspicious leak locales. This allows for a rigorous and versatile observation of leaks. One may focus to observe the cloud leaking out. One may also observe the color change on the heated sheet to indirectly indicate that a cooler tracer gas is leaking near the area of the color change on the sheet. Yet another mode of practice is to introduce CO2 that is 5-20° C./° F. cooler than that of atmosphere into the stator windings 16.
For many gases, the capability to absorb infrared radiation and to emit photons depends on the wavelength of the radiation. In other words, their degree of transparency varies with wavelength. There may be infrared wavelengths where they are essentially opaque due to absorption. Gases having the appropriate IR absorption spectrum include hydrocarbons. Preferably the tracer gas may be CO2, a natural cold gas stored in pressurized cylinders in liquid form around −80° C. Illustrated in
In one embodiment, the infrared imaging device 30 may be a thermographic infrared camera adapted to detect radiation in the infrared range of the electromagnetic spectrum (between 13 μm and 16 μm). Because the amount of radiation emitted by an object increases with temperature, infrared imaging device 30 may be used to display variations in temperature. When viewed through a thermographic infrared camera, warm or cold objects stand out well against cooler/warmer backgrounds. The infrared imaging device 30 may be used to detect gas temperature that is at least 0.1° C. or ° F. higher or lower, and preferably 1° C. or ° F. higher or lower, or even more preferably, 5-20° C. or ° F. higher or lower than that of atmosphere surrounding the stator windings 16. The infrared imaging device 30 may be used in a passive thermography system where the plume of leaking tracer gas is at a higher or lower temperature than the background. Alternately, the infrared imaging device 30 may be used as part of an active thermography system that utilizes an energy source to produce a thermal contrast between the plume of leaking tracer gas and the background. In the latter case, an infrared heating light 95 may be used to heat the local atmosphere of suspicious leak locales in order to create contrast with a leak gas cloud 65 escaping from a leak point 60. The distance, response time, angle of detection and image resolution may vary the requirement for the preferred temperature gradient of the tracer gas.
In step 105, an infrared imaging device 30 is disposed with a field of view encompassing at least one of a plurality of stator windings 16 of the liquid cooled turbine generator 11.
In step 106, the SLCS 15 is disconnected from the stator windings 16 and the stator windings 16 are dried with air.
In step 110, a tracer gas is introduced into the SLCS 15. The tracer gas will preferably have an absorption spectrum between 3 μm to 5 μm and more preferably between 3.8 μm to 4.6 μm. The tracer gas may be introduced from the stator windings 16 of the liquid cooled turbine generator 11. The tracer gas may have a density of between 0.5 to 2.5 g/liter. The tracer gas may be CO2 and may be introduced into stator windings 16 until the CO2 fills the inner volume of the stator windings 16. The tracer gas may be pressurized in the stator windings 16 up to 45 psig when there is a need to identify the smallest leak locales.
In step 115, the radiation received by the infrared imaging device 30 is filtered in the absorption spectrum of the tracer gas with a cold IR detector.
In step 120, an image of the tracer gas leaking from the stator windings 16 of the liquid cooled turbine generator 11 is displayed on the infrared imaging device 30.
In yet another embodiment, a safe, non-corrosive, distantly detectable gas other than CO2 may be provided. The gas acts as a gas sensor and fills into the SLCS 15 of the liquid cooled turbine generator 11 during its outage service. The method of gradually purging the inert tracer gas is compatible with generator safe operation protocol.
In yet another embodiment, the air may be cooled or heated prior to entering the SLCS 15. Air temperature of 3° C., or more preferably 5° C. to 20° C. above the ambient of any season may be preferred.
The embodiments set forth above do not exclude the use of a combination of leak detection methods. For instance, the detection may start with a conventional method, such as air pressure decay of the stator winding after draining the liquid coolant from the pipe lines. Then a vacuum decay test may be performed, followed by a helium probe sniffing around the most probable leak locales while the stator winding is connected to a mass spectrometer. After the preliminary vacuum and helium test, which may be time-consuming, the vacuumed stator winding is introduced with CO2 for the infrared imaging detection.
Where the definition of terms departs from the commonly used meaning of the term, applicant intends to utilize the definitions provided below, unless specifically indicated.
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. Where the definition of terms departs from the commonly used meaning of the term, applicant intends to utilize the definitions provided herein, unless specifically indicated. The singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be understood that, although the terms first, second, etc. may be used to describe various elements, these elements should not be limited by these terms. These terms are only used to distinguish one element from another. The term “and/or” includes any, and all, combinations of one or more of the associated listed items. The phrases “coupled to” and “coupled with” contemplates direct or indirect coupling.
This written description uses examples to disclose the invention, including the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the invention, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods. The patentable scope of the invention is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they have structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4293522 | Winkler | Oct 1981 | A |
4300066 | Butler, III | Nov 1981 | A |
4368694 | Ward et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
4612976 | Soucille et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4724799 | Traiteur et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4755473 | Nishino et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4789635 | Ackland et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4790327 | Despotis | Dec 1988 | A |
4801551 | Byers et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4822336 | DiTraglia | Apr 1989 | A |
4830010 | Marshall | May 1989 | A |
4851088 | Chandrasekhar et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4879999 | Leiman et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4945918 | Abernathy | Aug 1990 | A |
4957220 | Du | Sep 1990 | A |
4971900 | Ahnell et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4994117 | Fehder | Feb 1991 | A |
5042469 | Augustine | Aug 1991 | A |
5132094 | Godec et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5194134 | Futata et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5197464 | Babb et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5200089 | Siefert et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5203320 | Augustine | Apr 1993 | A |
5235846 | Fanciullo | Aug 1993 | A |
5272087 | El Murr et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5291879 | Babb et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5293875 | Stone | Mar 1994 | A |
5320967 | Avallone et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5326531 | Hahn et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5335536 | Runnevik | Aug 1994 | A |
5350011 | Sylvester | Sep 1994 | A |
5357971 | Sheehan et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5399535 | Whitman | Mar 1995 | A |
5404885 | Sheehan et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5432061 | Berndt et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5443991 | Godec et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5445160 | Culver et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5558082 | Spencer | Sep 1996 | A |
5563578 | Isenstein | Oct 1996 | A |
5565619 | Thungstrom et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5663489 | Thungstrom et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5749358 | Good et al. | May 1998 | A |
5750073 | Godec et al. | May 1998 | A |
5798271 | Godec et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5803898 | Bashour | Sep 1998 | A |
5820823 | Godec et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5823787 | Gonzalez et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5846836 | Mallow | Dec 1998 | A |
5857460 | Popitz | Jan 1999 | A |
5859503 | Potratz | Jan 1999 | A |
5867105 | Hajel | Feb 1999 | A |
5902751 | Godec et al. | May 1999 | A |
5924995 | Klein et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5932791 | Hambitzer et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5993624 | Matsubara et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6001064 | Weckstrom | Dec 1999 | A |
6058933 | Good et al. | May 2000 | A |
6130614 | Miller et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6159147 | Lichter et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6164277 | Merideth | Dec 2000 | A |
6183695 | Godec et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6190327 | Isaacson et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6228325 | Godec et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6247470 | Ketchedjian | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6250133 | Schell | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6318296 | Nguyen | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325978 | Labuda et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6365022 | Hitchman et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6378517 | Steen | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6432042 | Bashour | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6496106 | Rodriguez | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6540690 | Kanstad | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6544190 | Smits et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6584974 | Ratner | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6586173 | Tang | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6677159 | Mallow | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6712762 | Lichter et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6723285 | Chen et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6736199 | Wanni et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6775001 | Friberg et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6780646 | Brinton | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6786182 | Morgandi et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6874502 | Nashed | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6923939 | Nayar et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6969562 | Su et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6990980 | Richey, II | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7017578 | Tresnak et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7040319 | Kelly et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7098012 | Szyf et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7140370 | Tresnak et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7142105 | Chen | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7152598 | Morris et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7178519 | Melker et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7199706 | Dawson et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7229832 | Nayar et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7235054 | Eckerbom | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7324921 | Sugahara et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7326931 | Frodl et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7335164 | Mace et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7344503 | Friedman | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7353691 | Salem et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7361946 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7364553 | Paz et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7420473 | Eicken et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7445602 | Yamamori et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7455644 | Yamamori et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7464040 | Joao | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7465377 | Paris et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7473229 | Webber | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7490048 | Joao | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7497245 | Lorentz et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7564362 | Cole et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7608460 | Reed et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7621270 | Morris et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7626168 | Fischer et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7666377 | Wu et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7675655 | Marshall et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7712517 | Gandolfi et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7723711 | Schoo et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7749169 | Bayer et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7805256 | Frodl | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7811276 | O'Neil et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7811433 | Manoukian et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7833480 | Blazewics et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7839290 | Chidakel et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7842925 | Straub et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7897109 | Labuda et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7913541 | Serban et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7932496 | Kato et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7967759 | Couvillon, Jr. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7968346 | Reed et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7972824 | Simpson et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7992561 | Baker, Jr. et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7993586 | Fujiyama et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7997408 | Peck | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8028701 | Al-Ali et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8062221 | Debreczeny | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8066004 | Morris et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8083684 | Palatnik | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8109272 | Baker, Jr. et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8124419 | Brahim et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8128574 | Baker, Jr. et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8148167 | Reed et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8166967 | Qiu | May 2012 | B2 |
8183052 | Reed et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8188485 | Schoo et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8230720 | Serban et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8233954 | Kling et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8236459 | Ha et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8256414 | Ratner | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8261742 | Strothmann et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8274393 | Ales et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8283918 | Park et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8334975 | Cook | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8335992 | Skidmore et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
20080110243 | Burke et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080231719 | Benson et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20120330224 | Mailova et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 2010049569 | May 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Worden et al., “Understanding, diagnosing, and repairing leaks in water-cooled generator stator windings”, GE power systems, GER-3751A, Aug. 2001, 28 pages. |
English translation obtained from WIPO of WO 2010/049569, May 6, 2010, 27 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/911,567, filed Jun. 6, 2013, James Jun Xu. |
Xu, J. and A Garton, “The Chemical Composition of Water Trees in EPR Cable Insulation, IEEE Transactions, Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation”, Feb. 1994, 1, 18-24. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150028208 A1 | Jan 2015 | US |