This invention relates generally to a leak detection apparatus and method for the detection and location of leaks in underground or underwater storage containments such as fuel and hazards material storage tanks, under dispenser containment (UDC), vaults, and sumps, and will be described in connection with such utility, although other utilities are contemplated.
It is standard in the oil industry to employ pressure tests, various types of still gauging, or liquid level measurements or to perform measurements of hydrocarbons in the subsurface to determine if a containment is leaking. Each of these conventional methods suffers significant practical shortcomings. Known pressure tests are known to be insensitive and thus are not reliable. The still gauging methods require the tank to be filled with product to a point above ground where changes in liquid level can be observed in a small diameter tube, all the while monitoring for the product temperature to take into account thermal expansion or shrinkage effects. The major drawbacks to this method are inconvenience due to disruption of tank service for about twelve hours and the expense for testing and for the purchase of sufficient product to fill a potentially leaking tank.
Testing for hydrocarbons in the subsurface is known to be highly unreliable due partially to the fact that surface spills create relatively high subsurface product vapor concentrations. Thus vapor detection for leaks seldom is considered as reliable, let alone conclusive.
Once the presence or existence of a leak has been confirmed, none of the know leak detection methods can determine the exact location of the leak. Traditional leak detection methods requires the dangerous time consuming and expensive process of excavating the entire area around the containment. Subsurface soil or soil vapor samples can be taken around the containment to help determine a leak location but old spills and leaks will confuse the operator of the region the leak could possibly be located but even in the best conditions the exact location of the leak cannot be determined.
The foregoing discussion of the prior art derives primarily from U.S. Pat. No. 4,725,551 in which there is described a method and apparatus for detection and location of leaks in subsurface fluid storage tanks by mixing a quantity of a tracer with the fluid in the tank, providing at least one subsurface vapor or air inlet sampling pipe in the backfill or vicinity of the tank, providing at least one positive pressure vapor pipe in the backfill or adjacent vicinity of the tank, and drawing air from the positive pressure pipe which is flowed past the tank into the sampling pipe, and analyzing the air drawn into the sampling pipes for the presence of the tracer, indicating the detection of a leak in the tank.
Other prior art patents describing the various other systems for monitoring for leaks in underground storage tanks include U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,709,577; 4,725,551; 5,046,353 and 5,048,324. All of these prior art systems are cumbersome, and do not provide easy and reliable methods for testing and pinpointing the location of a leak in a tank.
It is an object of the present invention to provide an improved leak detection apparatus and method for use in conjunction with underground and underwater container systems.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a leak detection apparatus and method for detecting fluid leaks from subsurface and underwater liquid storage tanks.
A still further object of the present invention is to provide an improved leak detection apparatus and method for rapidly locating even small leaks in buried and underwater fuel storage containments and tanks.
Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a leak detection system and apparatus for use in conjunction with underground and underwater liquid storage tanks where a leak is suspected.
Still another object of the present invention is to provide a leak detection method and apparatus to use in conjunction with buried fuel tanks which can be implemented in new or existing service stations without requiring tank removal.
The present invention, in one aspect, provides a method and apparatus for detection and location of leaks in underground and underwater liquid fuel storage tanks such as fuel tanks and containments, in which the containment is emptied and interior inspected and clean as needed. Thereafter, the tank is sealed, and a vacuum pulled to reduce the interior pressure in the containment. A soap containing liquid is then sprayed on the interior surfaces of the containment, and the entire interior surfaces are visually inspected. Leaks appear as bubbles, pinpointing the location of a leak.
In one embodiment of the invention, a video record is made of essentially 100% of the interior wall area and all components within the containment.
In another and alternative embodiment of the invention, where the tank is an underwater storage tank, the tank walls are inspected and washed and dried as needed, the tank is sealed and a vacuum pulled. The existence and presence of leaks are determined by the appearance of water spots on the interior wall of the tank.
In one embodiment of the invention, the video camera is supported on a robot arm that controls movement of the video camera within the tank.
In another embodiment of the invention, the video camera is connected to a wand which is directed by a technician from outside the tank.
In still yet another embodiment of the invention, a technician may be positioned in the tank to observe the bubbles directly.
In yet another embodiment of the invention, a cover plate provided for temporary installation on the tank in place of the tank cover includes an aperture through which a vacuum is drawn.
In yet another embodiment of the invention reinforced gloves are provided through the cover plate for permitting a technician to manipulate lines and equipment such as a sprayer wand or video camera within the tank.
In yet another embodiment, the system includes a vacuum gauge for measuring the vacuum drawn on the containment.
In yet another embodiment, the system includes a soap reservoir external to the containment connected to a sprayer wand within the tank.
In still yet another embodiment of the invention, support struts are provided within the container to brace the walls and/or top of the tank or containment to prevent collapse when a vacuum is applied to the containment.
Further features and advantages of the present invention will be seen from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein
Referring to
A pair of reinforced long sleeve gloves 28 are mounted through plate 10 and sealed for permitting a technician to manipulate tools, etc., within the containment, as will be explained below.
Referring in particular to
Completing the system is a video monitor 42 which is hard wire or wireless connected to the camera 30.
Optionally, one or more support struts 44 may be provided for supporting the plate 10 and/or walls of the containment, to prevent potential collapse or implosion of the containment when a vacuum is pulled.
Referring to
Typically the soap solution comprises of surfactant and water, although commercial cleaning solutions can also be used.
Referring to
Various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope thereof.
For example, as shown in
The apparatus and method proposed herein offers a vastly more sensitive and faster tracer leak detector system that circumvents substantially all of the shortcomings and problems of the prior art.
There has thus been shown and described a novel apparatus and method for detecting leaks in a buried or submerged containments.
This application claims benefit to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/064,727, filed Oct. 16, 2014, the contents of which are incorporated herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3247375 | Lovelock | Apr 1966 | A |
3361908 | Petitjean et al. | Jan 1968 | A |
3518059 | Levy | Jun 1970 | A |
3714421 | Josias et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
4063156 | Patterson | Dec 1977 | A |
4141692 | Keller | Feb 1979 | A |
4156813 | Flanagan et al. | May 1979 | A |
4173141 | Kissell et al. | Nov 1979 | A |
4328700 | Fries | May 1982 | A |
4551154 | Malcosky et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4593530 | Longsworth | Jun 1986 | A |
4676261 | Blaul | Jun 1987 | A |
4690689 | Malcosky et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4709577 | Thompson | Dec 1987 | A |
4725551 | Thompson | Feb 1988 | A |
4748847 | Sheahan | Jun 1988 | A |
4773255 | Malcosky et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4806314 | Fertig et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4819477 | Fisher et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4896528 | Lewis | Jan 1990 | A |
5012052 | Hayes | Apr 1991 | A |
5046353 | Thompson | Sep 1991 | A |
5048324 | Thompson | Sep 1991 | A |
5070723 | Tsou et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5076728 | Golding | Dec 1991 | A |
5092155 | Rounbehler et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5111882 | Tang et al. | May 1992 | A |
5320967 | Avallone et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5388446 | Kronberg | Feb 1995 | A |
5409839 | Balestrieri et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5428988 | Starkovich | Jul 1995 | A |
5447055 | Thompson et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5620157 | Titzer | Apr 1997 | A |
5767390 | Chapman, IV | Jun 1998 | A |
5922943 | Chapman, IV | Jul 1999 | A |
5939619 | Achter et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6003365 | Pope et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6025200 | Kaish et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6035701 | Lowry et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6116776 | Bowling | Sep 2000 | A |
6196056 | Ewing et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6214624 | Barker et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6354141 | Pierrejean et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6460405 | Mayer et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6564614 | Doris | May 2003 | B1 |
6817227 | Thompson et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6840086 | McCoy et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6860141 | McCoy et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6871556 | Andresen et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6966213 | Hoots et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7032662 | Malone et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7047830 | Bratton et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7083742 | Nimitz et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7140232 | Wright et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7178385 | McCoy et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7197914 | Maresca, Jr. et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7331248 | Maresca, Jr. et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7576319 | Miller et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
8281642 | Lee et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8302461 | Angster et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8448495 | Breviere et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8756975 | Wu | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8806919 | Solomon et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
20030082918 | Hayasaka et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040170538 | Kawakami et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20060000298 | Thompson et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060258008 | Holler | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20130025349 | Solomon et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20170184554 | Ghiasvand et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2714125 | Feb 2012 | CA |
WO2008137279 | Nov 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Image of garden sprayer for bubble detection fluids”. Nondestructive Testing Handbook, vol. 1 (Leak Testing), 2nd Edition, American Society for Nondestructive Testing, Inc., 1982, p. 420. |
Nelson et al., “Field Study of the Partitioning Tracer Method for Detection of Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid in a Trichloroethene-Contaminated Aquifer,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 30, No. 9, 1996, pp. 2859-2863 (5 pgs). |
EPRI, “Condenser Leak Detection by Using SF6 as a Tracer Gas,” Technical Brief (undated) (2 pgs). |
Notice of Allowance issued in related U.S. Patent Appin. U.S. Appl. No. 15/084,267 dated Nov. 2, 2017, 12 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62064727 | Oct 2014 | US |